Bioaerosol Levels in Indoor Air of Animal House and Hospital Laboratories; A Comparison with Library and Administrative Offices

@#Introduction: This study reported the concentration of bacterial and fungal bioaerosol at an animal house and hospital laboratories with the aim to compare the concentration levels at library and administrative offices. The bioaerosol levels between mid-shift (afternoon) were also compared to the concentration measured during pre-shift (morning). Methods: The NIOSH 0800 method utilising microbiological air sampler collecting airborne bacterial and fungal samples via impaction technique on Nutrient agar (NA) and Sabouraud Dextrouse agar (SDA) as culture medium, respectively. Sampling was done twice daily; before (pre-shift) and during working (mid-shift) hour. Results: The highest bacteria and fungi concentration was recorded at the animal house with median concentration of 2477 CFU/ m3 (IQR=121-2477) and 791 CFU/m3 (IQR = 379-2081), respectively. Higher-risked workplaces such as animal house and hospital laboratories have significantly higher bioaerosol concentrations compared to control workplaces such as library and administrative offices (p<0.05). Interestingly, there were significantly higher fungi concentrations during the pre-shift compared to the mid-shift, for both high risk and control workplaces. Conclusion: Animal research room had exceeded the recommended bioaerosol level of 500 CFU/m3, but all the other sites had concentrations below the recommended level. Appropriate control measures should be adhered such as practicing hygiene practices and housekeeping to minimise the bioaerosol exposure among the workers and occupants.

Sanitary profile in mice and rat colonies in laboratory animal houses in Minas Gerais: I - Endo and ectoparasites / Perfil sanitário de colônias de camundongos e ratos de biotérios de Minas Gerais: I - Endo e ectoparasitos

The sanitary conditions of 13 animal houses in nine public institutions in Minas Gerais, and the presence of endo and ectoparasites of mice and rats colonies kept in these facilities were evaluated. Data about barriers to prevent the transmission of diseases and a program of sanitary monitoring were obtained through a questionnaire and local visit. Parasitological methods were performed for diagnosing mite, lice, helminthes, and protozoa parasites in 344 mice and 111 rats. Data have shown that the majority of the animal houses had neither proper physical environment nor protection barriers to prevent the transmission of infections. Parasitological results have shown that only one animal house (7.7 percent) had parasite free animals, whereas the others have presented infected animals and the prevalences of parasites in the mice colonies were: Myobia musculi (23.1 percent); Myocoptes musculinus (38.5 percent); Radfordia affinis (15.4 percent); Syphacia obvelata (92.3 percent); Aspiculuris tetraptera (23.1 percent); Hymenolepis nana (15.4 percent); Spironucleus muris (46.2 percent); Giardia muris (46.2 percent); Tritrichomonas muris (53.8 percent); Trichomonas minuta (61.5 percent); Hexamastix muris (7.7 percent); and Entamoeba muris (84.6 percent). As for the rat colonies, the prevalences were: Poliplax spinulosa (8.1 percent); Syphacia muris (46.2 percent); Trichosomoides crassicauda (28.6 percent); Spironucleus muris (85.7 percent); Tritrichomonas muris (85.7 percent); Trichomonas minuta (85.7 percent); Hexamastix muris (14.3 percent) and Entamoeba muris (85.7 percent)

Avaliaram-se as condições sanitárias de 13 biotérios de nove instituições públicas do estado de Minas Gerais, bem como a presença de endo e ectoparasitos nos camundongos e ratos criados nesses biotérios. Os dados sobre barreiras contra infecções e sobre o programa de monitoramento sanitário dos animais foram obtidos por meio de um questionário e de visitas aos biotérios. Métodos parasitológicos foram utilizados para o diagnóstico de ácaros, piolhos, helmintos e protozoários em 344 camundongos e 111 ratos. A maioria dos biotérios não possuía espaços físicos adequados nem barreiras de proteção que pudessem impedir a transmissão de infecções. Os resultados parasitológicos mostraram que em apenas um biotério não foram encontrados animais parasitados. A prevalência de parasitos encontrados em camundongos nos outros biotérios foi: Myobia musculi (23,1 por cento), Myocoptes musculinus (38,5 por cento), Radfordia affinis (15,4 por cento), Syphacia obvelata (92,3 por cento), Aspiculuris tetraptera (23,1 por cento), Hymenolepis nana (15,4 por cento), Spironucleus muris (46,2 por cento), Giardia muris (46,2 por cento), Tritrichomonas muris (53,8 por cento), Trichomonas minuta (61,5 por cento), Hexamastix muris (7,7 por cento) e Entamoeba muris (84,6 por cento). E nas colônias de ratos foram encontrados: Poliplax spinulosa (8,1 por cento), Syphacia muris (46,2 por cento), Trichosomoides crassicauda (28,6 por cento), Spironucleus muris (85,7 por cento), Tritrichomonas muris (85,7 por cento), Trichomonas minuta (85,7 por cento), Hexamastix muris (14,3 por cento) e Entamoeba muris (85,7 por cento)