Clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of an algorithmic approach to uveal effusion syndrome.

Purpose: To describe the clinical features and treatment outcomes in spontaneous uveal effusion syndrome (UES). Methods: A 10-year retrospective chart review of UES patients from a tertiary eye center was carried out. Optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography, and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) scans were performed. UES was managed based on presenting best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), symptoms, and fundus findings. Patients with secondary causes of uveal effusion were excluded. Results: Twenty-five eyes of 16 patients were included. Of the 16 patients, 14 (88%) were male and 9 (56%) had bilateral disease. Fifteen of 25 affected eyes had nanophthalmos (axial length (AL) <20.5 mm) and 6 had hyperopia with AL >20.5 mm. The presenting mean distance BCVA was 0.74 ± 0.64 logMAR (mean Snellen: 20/100). Eleven eyes had exudative retinal detachment, and 4 also had exudative choroidal detachment (CD). Choroidal thickness (CT) was increased in 11 eyes on B-scan ultrasonography, and the mean CT was 1.74 ± 0.38 mm. Sub-retinal fluid (SRF) and retinal folds were the most common OCT findings. UBM findings included shallow angles, peripheral CD, and supra-ciliary effusion. A combination of local and systemic corticosteroids was used to successfully treat 12 eyes, 6 needed surgery, and 7 were observed. Partial sclerectomy with anterior chamber maintainer-assisted SRF drainage was the favored surgery. The median period of follow-up was 6.5 months (0.1-76 months), and the mean distance BCVA at the last follow-up was 0.58 ± 0.42 logMAR (mean Snellen: 20/80). Conclusion: UES can be suitably managed both medically and surgically based on clinical presentation.

Spiral capsulorhexis technique with anterior chamber maintainer under continuous fluid pressure in intumescent cataracts and its clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of technique combining an anterior chamber maintainer (ACM) and spiral capsulorhexis under continuous fluid pressure in intumescent cataracts. METHODS: One hundred thirty-one eyes of 128 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation for intumescent white cataracts without a red reflex were included in the study. Group 1 consisted of 67 eyes of 65 patients who underwent spiral capsulorhexis with an ACM under continuous fluid pressure. Group 2 consisted of 64 eyes of 63 patients who underwent capsulorhexis after injection of viscoelastic material into the anterior chamber. Both groups were compared in terms of endothelial cell loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Progression to the periphery in the capsule not resulting in a radial tear was observed in 3 eyes in Group 1 and 11 eyes in Group 2 (P=0.019). While the type of radial tear known as the Argentinian flag sign was not observed in Group 1, it was observed in 8 eyes in Group 2 (P=0.003). Postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) decentration did not develop in any eye in group 1, but in 3 eyes in group 2 (P=0.11). CONCLUSION: The combination technique of an anterior chamber maintainer and spiral capsulorhexis provides a controlled and safe capsulorhexis and reduces intraoperative and postoperative complications in intumescent cataracts.

A simplified ex vivo model to learn the correct orientation of Descemet membrane endothelial graft.

We describe a simple, endoilluminator-assisted technique, which enables an easy identification of the descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft orientation, as well as provides its good visualization in the anterior chamber, during all the steps of surgery in the wet lab.

Trocar assisted nonappositional repair of iridodialysis.

PURPOSE: To describe trocar-assisted method of Nonappositional repair of iridodialysis. METHODS: The technique described involves placement of a 25 G trocar at the limbus wherein the lumen of the cannula works as a guide to introduce a double arm polypropylene suture attached to the long arm needle thereby preventing any accidental entrapment of corneal fibers into the needle. RESULTS: The technique was performed in 7 cases and no entrapment of corneal tissue was observed while maneuvering the suture needle through paracentesis incision during an iridodialysis repair procedure. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography demonstrated closure of the limbal trocar wound at 1-week follow-up. No incidence of wound leak or Descemets membrane detachment was observed. CONCLUSION: The technique allows performing iridodialysis repair in technically challenging situations by directing the needle appropriately and preventing any undulating movement inside the anterior chamber. The trocar-assisted method serves as an effective method to perform non-appositional iridodialysis repair.

Evaluation of complications and visual outcome in various nucleus delivery techniques of manual small incision cataract surgery.

Purpose: To evaluate various methods of nucleus delivery in manual small incision cataract surgery, with reference to visual outcome, intraoperative, and postoperative complications. Methods: In this prospective randomized interventional study, five groups of 40 cases each were constituted, with reference to nucleus delivery technique: (a) phacosandwich, (b) fishhook, (c) irrigating vectis, (d) viscoexpression, and (e) anterior chamber maintainer (ACM). Visual outcome, intraoperative, and postoperative complications were evaluated in detail. Follow-up was done on first and seventh postoperative days (PODs) and then at fourth and eighth postoperative weeks. Results: The most common intraoperative complication was intraoperative miosis, followed by intraoperative hyphema, seen more in phacosandwich and irrigating vectis groups. The most common postoperative complication was striate keratopathy followed by transient postoperative corneal edema and AC inflammatory response, seen more in phacosandwich and fishhook groups. With reference to visual acuity, on the first POD 95% cases of ACM group achieved visual acuity >+0.5 logMAR unit. The difference in the visual outcome among groups was statistically significant. On fourth and eighth postoperative weeks, best-corrected visual acuity among various groups was comparable. Conclusion: ACM and viscoexpression are effective techniques for early visual rehabilitation. Fishhook has limited utility in softer nuclear grades and black cataracts. Phacosandwich is more suitable for nuclear sclerosis Grades 3-4. Irrigating vectis, viscoexpression, and ACM technique are effective techniques for all grades of nucleus Postoperative surgical-induced astigmatism was comparable in all techniques.

Viscoless Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery with Trabeculectomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of combined manual small incision cataract and glaucoma surgery with anterior chamber maintainer (ACM) alone versus that with intraoperative viscoelastics. METHODS: Hospital electronic medical records of patients who underwent small incision cataract and trabeculectomy and intraocular lens implantation without Mitomycin-C from 2014 to 2016 were identified from the hospital operation theater database for this retrospective, hospital-based comparative study. All MSICS surgeries were performed by a single surgeon under peribulbar block. Data retrieved from all patients undergoing surgery with viscoelastic (group 2) or under AC maintainer without viscoelastic (group 1) included preoperative visual acuity, preoperative treated intraocular pressure, number of anti-glaucoma medications before surgery, total surgical time, intraoperative complications, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and IOP at one week and one month, need for additional procedures, and corneal clarity. Differences in surgical time and postoperative course in both groups were compared. RESULTS: Of 268 manual combined cataract and glaucoma surgeries done from 2014-2016, we identified 147 eyes of 130 age-matched patients, which included 51 PACG, 50 POAG, 12 NTG, and 24 PXG eyes with a mean age of 66 ±11.2 years and 64± 10.8 years in group 2 (n=74) and group 1 (n=73), respectively; p=0.9. The surgical time was significantly lower in group 1 (16±4.8 minutes compared to 44±14.6 minutes for group 2; p<0.001) with transient edema seen <1 week after surgery in 24 eyes of group 2 and seven eyes of group 1; p=0.02. The postoperative IOP at all postoperative visits dropped to >50% in both groups with 11 eyes (PXG n=6, PACG n=5) requiring medications for rise in intraocular pressure at a median time of 1.2 months (r=0.2-3 months). The final visual acuity improved >4 snellen lines in all cases with two patients with advanced damage having 1 line improvement in Snellen acuity at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The ACM can help completely avoid the use of viscoelastic during surgery, which can be an effective technique for MSICS with trabeculectomy in low resource stings. Training for such procedures should be incorporated into residency training programs.

Trabeculectomy with or without Anterior Chamber Maintainer: A Study on Intraocular Pressure, Endothelial Cells, and Central Corneal Thickness.

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of trabeculectomy and trabeculectomy with an anterior chamber (AC) maintainer on intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: The two groups consisted of 36 (trabeculectomy, Group A) and 42 (trabeculectomy with AC maintainer, Group B) patients with POAG. IOP, CCT, and ECD were measured one day prior to surgery, one month, six months, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: No complications were observed. The mean decrease of mean IOP from baseline to 12 months was statistically significant for both groups (all p < 0.0001), but more significant in Group B (p = 0.01). ECD decrease was significant in both Groups (all p < 0.01), but more significant in Group A (p < 0.0001). CCT decrease was also greater in Group A (p < 0.0001). The surgical procedure's duration was significantly longer in Group B than in Group A (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques seem to be effective and safe options for patients with POAG. Using an AC maintainer might add some safety for the ECD and a bit greater IOP reduction; however, the classic technique, which is of less complexity and less time-consuming, has comparable results.

Comparison of anterior chamber maintainer and viscoelastic agent on corneal astigmatism and endothelial cells after phacoemulsification / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM:To compare the influence of anterior chamber maintainer and viscoelastic agent on corneal astigmatism and endothelial cells after phacoemulsification.METHODS:Totally 70 patients(70 eyes) of cataract from April 2013 to April 2015 were randomly divided into the study group and the control group, with 35 cases in each group.The study group were treated with anterior chamber maintainer during phacoemulsification with support system approach, and the control group were treated with phacoemulsification under viscoelastic agent.RESULTS:The age (t=0.215, P=0.831), the density of corneal endothelial cells (t=-0.352, P=0.726) and corneal luminosity (t=-0.162, P=0.872) of two groups had no significant difference before surgery;there were no significant difference in preoperative visual acuity (t=0.463, P=0.599) and visual acuity (t=1.616, P=0.124) at 1mo after operation.And patients in the study group (t=-21.129, P<0.01) and the control group (t=-12.780, P<0.01) before surgery and 1mo postoperative when compared with the naked eye eyesight showed significant difference.The visual acuity after operations improved significantly.There were significant differences of corneal endothelial cells density (t=8.489, P< 0.01) and corneal astigmatism (t=-2.032, P=0.046) in the study group before surgery and 1mo after surgery;corneal endothelial cell density (t=8.999, P<0.01) and corneal astigmatism (t=-2.167, P=0.034) in the control group before surgery and 1mo after surgery also had significant differences.There was no significant difference in the rate of corneal endothelial cell loss between the two groups (t=0.410, P=0.683).CONCLUSION:Compared with viscoelastic agent, anterior chamber maintainer during phacoemulsification in patients with cataract won't increase the damage of postoperative surgically induced astigmatism and corneal endothelial cells, which mean the method of anterior chamber maintainer during phacoemulsification in the treatment of cataract is safe and effective.