Estudio tecnofarmacéutico de los Anticuerpos Conjugados a Fármacos comercializados en España / Technopharmaceutical study of antibodies drug conjugated marketed in Spain

Introducción: el tratamiento del cáncer supone uno de los grandes desafíos a los que se enfrenta la sociedad cien-tífica actual. En esta lucha sanitaria, se desarrollan los anticuerpos conjugados a fármacos, capaces de lograr la muerte celular mediante el transporte y liberación de compuestos citotóxicos selectivamente sobre células tumorales. Se componen de un anticuerpo monoclonal (de naturaleza proteica) unido a un fármaco citotóxico (de carácter lipófilo) mediante un enlazador. Las formulaciones se han de diseñar para mantener dicha unión durante su almacenamiento y administración. Objetivo: identificar los medicamentos comercializados en España cuyo principio activo es un anticuerpo conjugado a fármaco, estudiando diferentes aspectos tecnofarmacéuticos, en especial los componentes de sus formulaciones. Método: dado que este tipo de medicamento pertenece al grupo ATC L01F, han sido identificados a través del bus-cador de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios. La consulta de sus fichas técnicas, artículos de revisión e investigación relacionados con el tema así como el Handbook of Pharmaceuticals Excipients, ha permitido realizar el estudio tecnofarmacéutico. Resultados: se han analizado distintos aspectos tecnofarmacéuticos: forma farmacéutica, vía de administración, conservación y, en especial, sus formulaciones. Se ha estudiado en profundidad la naturaleza del principio activo y los requisitos de las formulaciones en base a sus características. Conclusiones: los ocho anticuerpos conjugados a fármacos aprobados en España se presentan en forma de polvo liofilizado en vial que se deben almacenar entre 2-8 ºC. Para su administración, se reconstituyen obteniéndose inicialmente un concentrado, que posteriormente se diluye y administra en forma de perfusión intravenosa o goteo. Su formulación tipo incluye un lioprotector, un antiagregante, un regulador del pH y eventualmente antioxidantes o reductores de la viscosidad. (AU)

Introduction: cancer treatment is one of the great challenges facing today’s scientific society. In this health fight, drug-conjugated antibodies (ADCs) are being developed, drugs capable of causing cell death by transporting and releasing cytotoxic compounds into tumor cells. They are composed of a monoclonal antibody (of protein nature) linked to a cytotoxic drug (of lipophilic character) through a linker. Formulations must be designed to maintain this binding during storage and administration.Objective: identify the medicines marketed in Spain whose active ingredient is an antibody-drug conjugate, studying techno pharmaceutical aspects, especially the components of their formulations. Method: since this type of drugs belongs to the ATC group L01F, they have been identified through the search engine of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Health Products. The search for their technical sheets, along with articles of review and research related to the topic, as well as the Handbook of Pharmaceuticals Excipients, has enabled the execution of the techno pharmaceutical study.the formulation of the tested conjugates to drugs marketed in Spain belonging to the ATC L01F group corresponding to “monoclonal antibodies and tested conjugated to drugs” identified through the search engine of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Health Products has been studied. Results: different aspects of this group of drugs have been analyzed, such as the pharmaceutical form, the route of administration, conservation and especially the techno pharmaceutical formulation. The nature of the active ingredient and the requirements of the formulations based on their characteristics have been studied in depth. Conclusions: the eight antibody-drug conjugates approved in Spain are presented in the form of lyophilized powder in a vial and should be stored between 2-8 ºC... (AU)

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Psoriatic Patients: A Multicenter, Retrospective, and Not-interventional Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Risankizumab - a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of IL-23 - has been recently approved to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Real-world data based on a representative pool of patients are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the mid- and long-term safety and efficacy profile of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective and multicenter study of consecutive psoriatic patients on risankizumab from April 2020 through November 2022. The primary endpoint was the number of patients who achieved a 100% improvement in their Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (PASI100) on week 52. RESULTS: A total of 510 patients, 198 (38.8%) women and 312 (61.2%) men were included in the study. The mean age was 51.7±14.4 years. A total of 227 (44.5%) study participants were obese (body mass index [BMI] >30kg/m2). The mean baseline PASI score was 11.4±7.2, and the rate of patients who achieved PASI100 on week 52, 67.0%. Throughout the study follow-up, 21%, 50.0%, 59.0%, and 66% of the patients achieved PASI100 on weeks 4, 16, 24, and 40, respectively. The number of patients who achieved a PASI ≤2 was greater in the group with a BMI ≤30kg/m2 on weeks 4 (P=.04), 16 (P=.001), and 52 (P=.002). A statistically significantly greater number of patients achieved PASI100 in the treatment-naïve group on weeks 16 and 52 (P=.001 each, respectively). On week 16 a significantly lower number of participants achieved PASI100 in the group with psoriatic arthropathy (P=.04). Among the overall study sample, 22 (4.3%) patients reported some type of adverse event and 20 (3.9%) discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab proved to be a safe and effective therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the routine clinical practice.

Efectos secundarios oculares de las terapias oncológicas. Revisión / Ocular side effects of oncological therapies: Review

Con el avance de la terapia contra el cáncer en los últimos años, ha aumentado el conocimiento de los mecanismos involucrados en esta enfermedad, lo que ha supuesto un aumento de la calidad de vida y de la supervivencia de los pacientes con afecciones tumorales anteriormente consideradas incurables o refractarias al tratamiento. El número de fármacos utilizados ha sufrido un aumento exponencial, y a pesar de que la toxicidad implícita es menor que la de la terapia antineoplásica convencional, conllevan la aparición de nuevos efectos adversos asociados, que el oftalmólogo debe reconocer y manejar.(AU)

With the advance of cancer therapy in recent years, the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in this disease has increased, which has meant an increase in the quality of life and survival of patients with tumor pathologies previously considered incurable or refractory to treatment. The number of drugs used has increased exponentially in number, and although the implicit toxicity is lower than that of conventional antineoplastic therapy, they lead to the appearance of new associated adverse effects that the ophthalmologist must recognize and manage.(AU)

[Immunotherapy in multiple myeloma]. / Inmunoterapia en el mieloma múltiple.

Patients with multiple myeloma who present with refractory disease or relapse after receiving the main classes of available drugs -immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors and antibodies against CD38- do not have satisfactory therapeutic alternatives. New treatments based on the redirection of T lymphocytes to act directly against tumor cells, such as bispecific antibodies and T cells with chimeric antigen receptors, are changing this scenario. The published information confirms unprecedented antitumor activity of these agents in patients with refractory myeloma and they will certainly represent the backbone of the treatment of these patients in the immediate future. However, these therapies also present specific characteristics and medium or long-term toxicities that pose new healthcare challenges. In this review, we address the current results and future challenges of the administration of these treatments in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Ocular side effects of oncological therapies: Review.

With the advance of cancer therapy in recent years, the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in this disease has increased, which has meant an increase in the quality of life and survival of patients with tumor pathologies previously considered incurable or refractory to treatment. The number of drugs used has increased exponentially in number, and although the implicit toxicity is lower than that of conventional antineoplastic therapy, they lead to the appearance of new associated adverse effects that the ophthalmologist must recognize and manage.

Actualización en prevención de VRS: Nirsevimab vs vacunación en embarazadas (RSVpreF) / Update on RSV prevention: Nirsevimab vs vaccination in pregnant women (RSVpreF)

El anticuerpo monoclonal Nirsevimab fue el primero que se implantó para la prevención de infección por virus respiratorio sincitial (VRS) de todos los lactantes en sus primeros meses de vida. Recientemente se ha aprobado el uso de una vacuna en la embarazada (RSVpreF) con distinta forma de inmunización pero el mismo objetivo en el lactante. De este modo, surge la necesidad de valorar una nueva estrategia de inmunización. Desarrollo. Nirsevimab demostró en ensayos clínicos buenos datos de eficacia clínica y de seguridad. Tras su inclusión en la temporada epidémica 2023-2024, la cobertura en España ha sido muy alta y los resultados preliminares parecen mantener la tendencia de los ensayos. Queda pendiente una valoración adecuada de su eficiencia. RSVpreF tiene resultados similares pero, de momento, solo en ensayos y, aunque podría tener alguna ventaja inmunológica, se desconoce si se traduciría en eficacia real. Aún así, esta nueva vacuna respaldada por organismos sanitarios y científicos sería una alternativa segura y eficaz. Por otro lado, incluso con la implementación en el calendario vacunal de RSVpreF, Nirsevimab va a continuar siendo clave en la protección de ciertos lactantes. Conclusión. La aprobación de la vacuna en la embarazada RSVpreF añade una segunda herramienta inmunológica frente a la infección por VRS en lactantes. RSVpreF y Nirsevimab pueden desarrollar un papel complementario en la prevención de estas infecciones.(AU)

Introduction: Nirsevimab was the first monoclonal antibody to be implemented in order to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in all infants in their first months of life. The use of a vaccine in pregnant women (RSVpreF) using a different way of immunization but still sharing the same objective in infants has recently been approved. Thus, there is a necessity to evaluate a new immunization strategy. Development. Nirsevimab showed good clinical efficacy and safety data in medical trials. After its inclusion in the 2023-2024 epidemic season, coverage in Spain has been very high and preliminary results seem to maintain the trend shown in the trials. An adequate assessment of its efficiency is still pending. RSVpreF has similar results but, for now, only in trials and although it could have some immunological advantages, it is unknown if it would result in actual efficacy. Even so, this new vaccine, supported by health and scientific organizations, would provide a safe and effective alternative. Nonetheless, even with the implementation in the RSVpreF vaccine schedule, Nirsevimab will continue to be a key factor in the protection of certain infants. Conclusion. The approval of the RSVpreF vaccine in pregnant women adds a second immunological tool against RSV infections in infants. RSVpreF and Nirsevimab may play a complementary role in the prevention of these infections.(AU)

Efectividad y seguridad de los nuevos anticuerpos monoclonales en la profilaxis de la migraña / Effectiveness and safety of new monoclonal antibodies in migraine prophylaxis

Objetivos: Analizar la efectividad y seguridad en vida real de los nuevos anticuerpos monoclonales subcutáneos para la profilaxis de la migraña. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo llevado a cabo desde enero de 2020 hasta abril de 2021 con pacientes diagnosticados de migraña crónica o episódica. Las variables de interés se analizaron por el personal facultativo farmacéutico en una base de datos anonimizada. Esta base se completa como práctica clínica habitual durante la entrevista clínica en la consulta de pacientes externos. Resultados: Se analizaron 53 pacientes. Se observó una reducción del número de crisis respecto al valor basal a los 3, a los 6 y a los 12 meses de tratamiento, así como de otros fármacos para el tratamiento de la migraña. La mayoría de reacciones adversas descritas fueron de tipo leve, obligando a la suspensión del tratamiento de solo uno de los pacientes. Se describió un aumento de la tensión arterial en varios pacientes, así como una incidencia de estreñimiento superior a los ensayos pivotales. Conclusiones: Este estudio muestra una disminución del número de crisis de migraña y del uso de otros fármacos antimigrañosos tras el uso de anticuerpos monoclonales. Los tratamientos se pueden considerar seguros, observándose una baja incidencia de reacciones adversas graves. La mayoría de pacientes fueron tratados con erenumab. Se dispone de menos datos a medida que avanza del tiempo de estudio, por lo que resulta necesario recopilar más información para conocer el perfil de efectividad y seguridad de estos fármacos a largo plazo.(AU)

Objectives: To analyse the effectiveness and safety in real life of new subcutaneous monoclonal antibodies for the prophylaxis of migraine. Methods: Retrospective observational study conducted from January 2020 to April 2021 with patients diagnosed with chronic or episodic migraine. The variables of interest were collected by the pharmacist in an anonymised database during the clinical interview in the outpatient clinic. This databased is completed as standard clinical practice during the clinical interview in the outpatient clinic. Results: 53 patients were analysed. A reduction in the number of attacks from baseline was observed at 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment, as well as for other migraine treatment drugs. Most of the adverse reactions described were mild, leading to discontinuation of treatment in only one patient. An increase in blood pressure was reported in several patients, as well as a higher incidence of constipation than in pivotal trials. Conclusions: This study shows a decrease in the number of migraine attacks and in the use of other anti-migraine drugs after the use of monoclonal antibodies. The treatments can be considered safe, with a low incidence of serious adverse reactions. Most patients were treated with erenumab. Less information is available as the study time progresses, so more information needs to be collected to understand the long-term effectiveness and safety profile of these drugs.(AU)

Aspectos prácticos sobre la determinación de PD-L1 en el tratamiento de carcinoma urotelial. Consenso del grupo de uropatología de la SEAP / Practical aspects of PD-L1 assessment in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma: Consensus of the uropathology group of the SEAP

La reciente llegada de nuevos fármacos de inmunoterapia para el tratamiento del carcinoma urotelial hace necesario establecer criterios para armonizar la determinación de PD-L1 mediante inmunohistoquímica como factor pronóstico y para la selección de pacientes a tratar. En este escenario, un grupo de uropatólogos de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica, junto con un oncólogo médico como colaborador externo subespecializado en urooncología, ha elaborado este documento de recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia disponible. En la determinación de PD-L1 son especialmente relevantes la selección de la muestra analizada, su procesamiento, la plataforma de inmunohistoquímica y anticuerpo empleados, así como el algoritmo que se aplique para la lectura. Todos estos aspectos deben indicarse en el informe de resultados, que debería poder ser fácilmente interpretable en un contexto de rápida evolución de terapias inmunológicas.(AU)

The recent addition of novel immunotherapy drugs for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma makes it necessary the establishment of criteria to harmonize the immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1, both as a prognostic factor and for the selection of patients to be treated. In this scenario, a group of uropathologists from the Spanish Society of Pathological Anatomy, together with a medical oncologist as an external collaborator subspecialized in uro-oncology, have prepared this document of recommendations based on the available evidence. During PD-L1 assessment it is especially relevant the selection of the sample, its processing, the immunohistochemical platform and antibody used, and the algorithm applied in the interpretation of results. All these aspects must be indicated in the results report, which should be easily interpretable in a context of rapid evolution of immunological therapies.(AU)

Recomendaciones de consenso para el tratamiento de la prevención de la migraña / Consensus recommendations for the treatment of migraine prevention

Objetivo los objetivos son conocer la opinión de neurólogos y farmacéuticos hospitalarios sobre aquellos aspectos aún en el debate respecto al papel de los anticuerpos monoclonales anti-CGRP en el tratamiento preventivo de la migraña. Identificar aquellas controversias aún existentes. Proponer recomendaciones consensuadas de mejora asistencial. Y promover el acceso de los clínicos y los pacientes a estos nuevos tratamientos en la prevención de la migraña con fármacos biológicos, a fin de mejorar la atención y seguimiento del paciente. Métodos se identificaron y valoraron recomendaciones para la utilización de fármacos biológicos en la prevención de la migraña a través de la metodología de consenso Delphi, proponiendo 88 aseveraciones agrupadas en 3 temas: un módulo de clínica que trata sobre el manejo de los tratamientos biológicos en la migraña, un módulo de pacientes que trata sobre las estrategias de educación al paciente y mejora de la adhesión y un módulo de coordinación que incluye las aseveraciones relacionadas con las estrategias para mejorar el trabajo conjunto entre los 2 colectivos. Se empleó la escala ordinal de Likert de 9 puntos para puntuar dichas recomendaciones y, posteriormente, los datos se analizaron estadísticamente a través de diferentes métricas. Resultados tras las 2 rondas de consulta, se alcanzó consenso en el acuerdo en 71 aseveraciones (80,7%) y consenso en el desacuerdo en una de ellas (1,1%), quedando como indeterminadas 16 aseveraciones (18,2%) de las 88 debatidas. Conclusiones el alto grado de consenso indica que la opinión de neurólogos y farmacéuticos hospitalarios sobre el papel de los anticuerpos monoclonales anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña es muy similar y permite identificar aquellas controversias aún existentes, para mejorar la atención y seguimiento del paciente con migraña. (AU)

Objective The objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. Methodology Recommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into three themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analyzed through different metrics. Results After both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving one statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). Conclusions The high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine. (AU)

[Absceso cerebral como manifestación inicial de Deficiencia especifica de anticuerpos].

Background: Specific antibody deficiency (SAD) is an inborn error of immunity, in patients older than 2 years, characterized by normal immunoglobulin levels and IgG subclasses, but with recurrent infections and decreased antibody responses to polysaccharide antigens. Case report: A 10-year-old female, previously healthy, with no significant family history. She is known in this institution for symptoms of headache, vomiting and paresis. A CT scan of the skull was performed, where 4 brain abscesses, edema and displacement of the midline were observed, a right frontal trephine was performed and abscess drainage, antimicrobial management for infectology, blood cultures, Gram staining and cultures of negative drainage material. Assessed for allergy and immunology, for abscesses in deep focus, an approach was performed to rule out inborn error of immunity, immunoglobulins, isohemagglutinins, flow cytometry and response to normal protein antigens. Antibodies against post-vaccination polysaccharide antigens are requested, where a response to only 2 serotypes (18.1% response) is observed, with normal IgG subclasses, a diagnosis of specific antibody deficiency is integrated and management with immuno- globulin at replacement doses is started, as well as annual vaccination with 13 valent. Conclusion: SAD has been considered a problem that can be resolved over time, especially in children, but in others it can evolve into more severe forms of humoral immunodeficiency. Decisions to treat with prophylactic antibiotics and/or gamma globulin are guided by clinical judgment, small studies, and recent consensus documents, which may evolve over time.

Antecedentes: La deficiencia especifica de anticuerpos (SAD) es un error innato de la inmunidad, en pacientes de más de 2 años, caracterizada por niveles de inmunoglobulinas y subclases de IgG normales, pero con infecciones recurrentes y respuestas de anticuerpos disminuidas a antígenos polisacáridos. Reporte de caso: Femenina de 10 años, previa sana, sin antecedentes heredofamiliares de importancia. Conocida en esta institución por cuadro de cefalea, vómi- tos y paresias. Se realiza TAC de cráneo, donde se observan 4 abscesos cerebrales, edema y desplazamiento de la línea media, se realiza trepano frontal derecha y drenaje de abscesos, manejo antimicrobiano por infectología, hemocultivos, tinción de Gram y cultivos de material de drenaje negativos. Valorado por alergia e inmunología, por abscesos en foco profundo, se realizó abordaje para descartar error innato de la inmunidad, inmunoglobulinas, isohemaglutininas, citometría de flujo y respuesta a antígenos proteicos normales. Se solicitan anticuerpos contra antígenos polisacáridos post vacunación, donde se observa respuesta a solo 2 serotipos (respuesta del 18.1%), con subclases de IgG normales, se integra diagnóstico de deficiencia especifica de anticuerpos y se inicia manejo con inmuno- globulina a dosis de reemplazo, asi como vacunación anual con 13 valente. Conclusión: El SAD se ha considerado un problema que puede resolverse con el tiempo, especialmente en niños, pero en otros puede evolucionar hacia formas más severas de inmunodeficiencia humoral. Las decisiones de tratar con antibióticos profilácticos y/o gammaglobulina están guiadas por el juicio clínico, estudios pequeños y documentos de consenso recientes, que pueden evolucionar con el tiempo.

Association between toxoplasmosis and autoimmune rheumatic diseases in Egyptian patients.

PURPOSE: To explore the association between T. gondii and autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). METHODS: This study involved 82 patients with ARDs: 44 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 28 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 10 systemic sclerosis (SSc) and 61 age- and sex-matched controls. Sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and disease activity was assessed. Exposure to toxoplasmosis risk factors was investigated. Serological tests for anti-Toxoplasma IgM and IgG antibodies were assessed using ELISA. RESULTS: In SLE patients, a significant difference of T. gondii IgM versus controls was detected (P=.03). In RA and SLE patients, T. gondii IgG showed a significant difference versus controls (34 (77.3%) P=.001 and 18 (64.3%) P=.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in SSc versus controls. Fetal congenital anomalies displayed a significant difference in IgM seropositive compared to seronegative patients (P=.04). Cat exposure showed a significant difference between IgM and IgG seropositive versus seronegative patients (12 (80.0%) P=.02 and 34 (59.6) P=.04, respectively). There was no significant difference in seropositive patients regarding history of abortion, neuro-psychiatric manifestations, disease activity parameters (ESR, CRP), or different regimens of medications. CONCLUSION: Toxoplasma IgM seropositivity is associated with SLE patients. T. gondii IgG seropositivity is associated with both RA and SLE patients. However, Toxoplasma seropositivity had no association with SSc patients. An association between fetal congenital anomalies and IgM seropositivity was demonstrated. A linkage between cat exposure as a risk factor and toxoplasmosis was suggested among ARD patiants. Exploration of impact of toxoplasmosis on ARDs is a necessity through randomized controlled trials.

Association between toxoplasmosis and autoimmune rheumatic diseases in Egyptian patients / Asociación entre toxoplasmosis y enfermedades reumáticas autoinmunes en pacientes egipcios

Purpose: To explore the association between T. gondii and autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Methods: This study involved 82 patients with ARDs: 44 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 28 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 10 systemic sclerosis (SSc) and 61 age- and sex-matched controls. Sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and disease activity was assessed. Exposure to toxoplasmosis risk factors was investigated. Serological tests for anti-Toxoplasma IgM and IgG antibodies were assessed using ELISA. Results: In SLE patients, a significant difference of T. gondii IgM versus controls was detected (P=.03). In RA and SLE patients, T. gondii IgG showed a significant difference versus controls (34 (77.3%) P=.001 and 18 (64.3%) P=.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in SSc versus controls. Fetal congenital anomalies displayed a significant difference in IgM seropositive compared to seronegative patients (P=.04). Cat exposure showed a significant difference between IgM and IgG seropositive versus seronegative patients (12 (80.0%) P=.02 and 34 (59.6) P=.04, respectively). There was no significant difference in seropositive patients regarding history of abortion, neuro-psychiatric manifestations, disease activity parameters (ESR, CRP), or different regimens of medications. Conclusion: Toxoplasma IgM seropositivity is associated with SLE patients. T. gondii IgG seropositivity is associated with both RA and SLE patients. However, Toxoplasma seropositivity had no association with SSc patients. An association between fetal congenital anomalies and IgM seropositivity was demonstrated. A linkage between cat exposure as a risk factor and toxoplasmosis was suggested among ARD patiants. Exploration of impact of toxoplasmosis on ARDs is a necessity through randomized controlled trials.(AU)

Propósito: Explorar la asociación entre Toxoplasma gondii y enfermedades reumáticas autoinmunes (ERA).Métodos: Este estudio involucró a 82 pacientes con ERA: 44 con artritis reumatoide (AR), 28 con lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) y 10 con esclerosis sistémica (SSc); y 61 controles emparejados por edad y sexo. Se recopilaron datos sociodemográficos, clínicos y de laboratorio, y se evaluó la actividad de la enfermedad. Se indagó exposición a factores de riesgo de toxoplasmosis. Las pruebas serológicas de anticuerpos IgM e IgG antitoxoplasma se evaluaron mediante ELISA.Resultados: En pacientes con LES se detectó una diferencia significativa de T. gondii IgM vs. controles (p = 0,03). En pacientes con AR y LES, T. gondii IgG mostró una diferencia significativa frente a los controles (34 [77,3%] p = 0,001 y 18 [64,3%] p = 0,03, respectivamente). No hay diferencia significativa en SSc vs. controles. Las anomalías congénitas fetales mostraron una diferencia significativa en los pacientes seropositivos para IgM en comparación con los pacientes seronegativos (p = 0,04). La exposición a los gatos mostró una diferencia significativa entre los pacientes seropositivos para IgM e IgG frente a los seronegativos (12 [80%] p = 0,02 y 34 [59,6] p = 0,04, respectivamente). No hubo diferencias significativas en pacientes seropositivos con respecto a antecedentes de aborto, manifestaciones neuropsiquiátricas, parámetros de actividad de la enfermedad (ESR, CRP) o diferentes regímenes de medicamentos.(AU)

Serum PLA2R antibody as a predictive biomarker for venous thromboembolism risk in primary membranous nephropathy / El anticuerpo PLA2R sérico como biomarcador predictivo del riesgo de tromboembolia venosa en la nefropatía membranosa primaria

Background Patients with nephrotic syndrome are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). The phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) is a marker of primary membranous nephropathy activity. This study investigated the predictive value of PLA2R antibodies in PMN for VTE.Methods In this retrospective study, we included 97 PMN patients and evaluated the predictive value of serum PLA2R antibodies for VTE risk. Lower extremity venous ultrasound, renal vein ultrasound, or spiral computed tomography pulmonary arteriography were used to assess VTE events. Serum anti-PLA2R antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The risk of VTE was stratified according to serum albumin levels. Results Twenty PMN patients (21%) had thromboembolic events. Eight (15%) of patients with serum albumin >25g/l developed VTE, 6 of whom were positive for serum PLA2R antibodies. Positive serum PLA2R antibodies were significantly associated with VTE events in patients with serum albumin >25g/l (p=0.01). Age, sex, blood creatinine, serum albumin, and 24-h urine protein levels were not statistically different between the two groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis using the log-rank test revealed anti-PLA2R positive membranous nephropathy patients had more probability of VTE events than anti-PLA2R negative patients. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that lnPLA2R-Ab is an unfavorable predictor for VTE events in patients with serum albumin >25g/l (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, p=0.01). Conclusions The PLA2R antibody was a risk predictor for thromboembolic events in patients with primary membranous nephropathy with serum albumin >25g/l (AU)

Antecedentes Los pacientes con síndrome nefrótico presentan un alto riesgo de tromboembolia venosa (TEV), especialmente en el caso de la nefropatía membranosa primaria (NMP). El receptor de fosfolipasa A2 (PLA2R) es un marcador de la actividad de la NMP. Este estudio investigó el valor predictivo de los anticuerpos PLA2R en NMP para TEV. Métodos En este estudio retrospectivo, se incluyeron 97 pacientes con NMP y se evaluó el valor predictivo de los anticuerpos PLA2R en suero para el riesgo de TEV. Se utilizaron la ecografía venosa de las extremidades inferiores, la ecografía de la vena renal o la arteriografía pulmonar por tomografía computarizada en espiral para evaluar los episodios de TEV. Los anticuerpos séricos anti-PLA2R se detectaron mediante un ensayo inmunoenzimático (ELISA). El riesgo de TEV se estratificó en función de los niveles de albúmina sérica. Resultados Veinte pacientes con NMP (21%) presentaron episodios tromboembólicos. Ocho (15%) de los pacientes con albúmina sérica>25g/l desarrollaron TEV, 6 de los cuales fueron positivos para anticuerpos PLA2R séricos. La positividad de los anticuerpos PLA2R séricos se asoció significativamente con episodios de TEV en pacientes con albúmina sérica>25g/l (p=0,01). La edad, el sexo, la creatinina en sangre, la albúmina sérica y los niveles de proteínas en orina de 24h no fueron estadísticamente diferentes entre los 2 grupos. El análisis de Kaplan-Meier mediante la prueba de rangos logarítmicos reveló que los pacientes con nefropatía membranosa positivos para anti-PLA2R tenían más probabilidad de sufrir TEV que los pacientes negativos para anti-PLA2R. El análisis univariante de riesgos proporcionales de Cox reveló que ln PLA2R-Ab es un predictor desfavorable de episodios de TEV en pacientes con albúmina sérica>25g/l (hazard ratio 2,1; p=0,01). Conclusiones El anticuerpo PLA2R fue un predictor de riesgo de episodios tromboembólicos en pacientes con NMP con albúmina sérica>25g/l (AU)

[Practical aspects of PD-L1 assessment in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma: Consensus of the uropathology group of the SEAP]. / Aspectos prácticos sobre la determinación de PD-L1 en el tratamiento de carcinoma urotelial. Consenso del grupo de uropatología de la SEAP.

The recent addition of novel immunotherapy drugs for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma makes it necessary the establishment of criteria to harmonize the immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1, both as a prognostic factor and for the selection of patients to be treated. In this scenario, a group of uropathologists from the Spanish Society of Pathological Anatomy, together with a medical oncologist as an external collaborator subspecialized in uro-oncology, have prepared this document of recommendations based on the available evidence. During PD-L1 assessment it is especially relevant the selection of the sample, its processing, the immunohistochemical platform and antibody used, and the algorithm applied in the interpretation of results. All these aspects must be indicated in the results report, which should be easily interpretable in a context of rapid evolution of immunological therapies.

Nirsevimab para la prevención de la enfermedad por virus respiratorio sincitial en niños. Posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica / Nirsevimab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in children: Statement of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Disease (SEIP)

Introducción: Recientemente se ha aprobado en Europa y en España el uso de nirsevimab, un anticuerpo monoclonal (AcM) para la prevención de la enfermedad por virus respiratorio sincitial (VRS). Objetivos: Facilitar unas recomendaciones para la administración de nirsevimab para la prevención de la enfermedad por VRS. Métodos: Para la elaboración de estas recomendaciones, se decidió realizar una revisión crítica de la literatura, utilizando la metodología Delphi y la metodología GRADE. Se definió un grupo de expertos. Se realizaron tres rondas para definir las preguntas, manifestarse a favor o en contra, graduar la recomendación, y definir el acuerdo o el desacuerdo con las conclusiones. Resultados: En la población general de recién nacidos, se recomienda administrar rutinariamente nirsevimab para reducir la enfermedad y la hospitalización por bronquiolitis y enfermedad de vías bajas por VRS. Se recomienda administrar nirsevimab a todos los lactantes que nazcan en la estación de alta incidencia de VRS y aquellos que cuando esta comience, tengan menos de seis meses de edad. En los pacientes prematuros de 29 a 35 semanas de edad gestacional, en los lactantes con cardiopatía hemodinámicamente significativa y lactantes con enfermedad pulmonar crónica se recomienda rutinariamente administrar nirsevimab para reducir la enfermedad y la hospitalización por bronquiolitis y enfermedad de vías bajas por VRS. En los pacientes con indicación actual de palivizumab, se recomienda sustituir palivizumab por nirsevimab para reducir la carga de enfermedad de bronquiolitis. Conclusiones: Se recomienda administrar rutinariamente nirsevimab a todos los recién nacidos menores de seis meses nacidos en la estación de VRS o que tengan menos de seis meses cuando entran en la estación invernal, para reducir la carga de enfermedad y la hospitalización por bronquiolitis. (AU)

Introduction: Nirsevimab, a monoclonal antibody for the prevention of disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), has recently been approved for use in Europe and Spain. Objectives: To provide recommendations for the administration of nirsevimab for prevention of RSV disease. Methods: The approach chosen to develop these recommendations involved a critical review of the literature and the use of the Delphi and GRADE methods. An expert group was formed. The group engaged in three rounds to define the questions, express support or opposition, grade recommendations and establish the agreement or disagreement with the conclusions. Results: In the general neonatal population, routine administration of nirsevimab is recommended to reduce the frequency of illness and hospitalisation for bronchiolitis and RSV lower respiratory tract infection. Nirsevimab is recommended for all infants born in high-incidence RSV season and infants aged less than 6 months at the season onset. In infants born preterm between 29 and 35 weeks of gestation, with haemodynamically significant heart disease or with chronic lung disease, routine administration of nirsevimab is recommended to reduce the incidence of disease and hospitalisation due to bronchiolitis and RSV lower respiratory tract infection. In patients in whom palivizumab is currently indicated, its substitution by nirsevimab is recommended to reduce the burden of bronchiolitis. Conclusions: Routine administration of nirsevimab to all infants aged less than 6 months born during the RSV season or aged less than 6 months at the start of the winter season is recommended to reduce the burden of disease and the frequency of hospitalization due to bronchiolitis. (AU)

[Translated article] Consensus recommendations on the preventive treatment of migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. METHODOLOGY: Recommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into 3 themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analysed through different metrics. RESULTS: After both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving 1 statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine.

Nirsevimab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in children. Statement of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Disease (SEIP).

INTRODUCTION: Nirsevimab, a monoclonal antibody for the prevention of disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), has recently been approved for use in Europe and Spain. OBJECTIVES: To provide recommendations for the administration of nirsevimab for prevention of RSV disease. METHODS: The approach chosen to develop these recommendations involved a critical review of the literature and the use of the Delphi and GRADE methods. An expert group was formed. The group engaged in three rounds to define the questions, express support or opposition, grade recommendations and establish the agreement or disagreement with the conclusions. RESULTS: In the general neonatal population, routine administration of nirsevimab is recommended to reduce the frequency of illness and hospitalisation for bronchiolitis and RSV lower respiratory tract infection. Nirsevimab is recommended for all infants born in high-incidence RSV season and infants aged less than 6 months at the season onset. In infants born preterm between 29 and 35 weeks of gestation, with haemodynamically significant heart disease or with chronic lung disease, routine administration of nirsevimab is recommended to reduce the incidence of disease and hospitalisation due to bronchiolitis and RSV lower respiratory tract infection. In patients in whom palivizumab is currently indicated, its substitution by nirsevimab is recommended to reduce the burden of bronchiolitis. CONCLUSIONS: Routine administration of nirsevimab to all infants aged less than 6 months born during the RSV season or aged less than 6 months at the start of the winter season is recommended to reduce the burden of disease and the frequency of hospitalization due to bronchiolitis.

Serum PLA2R antibody as a predictive biomarker for venous thromboembolism risk in primary membranous nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with nephrotic syndrome are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). The phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) is a marker of primary membranous nephropathy activity. This study investigated the predictive value of PLA2R antibodies in PMN for VTE. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 97 PMN patients and evaluated the predictive value of serum PLA2R antibodies for VTE risk. Lower extremity venous ultrasound, renal vein ultrasound, or spiral computed tomography pulmonary arteriography were used to assess VTE events. Serum anti-PLA2R antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The risk of VTE was stratified according to serum albumin levels. RESULTS: Twenty PMN patients (21%) had thromboembolic events. Eight (15%) of patients with serum albumin >25g/l developed VTE, 6 of whom were positive for serum PLA2R antibodies. Positive serum PLA2R antibodies were significantly associated with VTE events in patients with serum albumin >25g/l (p=0.01). Age, sex, blood creatinine, serum albumin, and 24-h urine protein levels were not statistically different between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis using the log-rank test revealed anti-PLA2R positive membranous nephropathy patients had more probability of VTE events than anti-PLA2R negative patients. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that lnPLA2R-Ab is an unfavorable predictor for VTE events in patients with serum albumin >25g/l (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The PLA2R antibody was a risk predictor for thromboembolic events in patients with primary membranous nephropathy with serum albumin >25g/l.

Comparative effectiveness and drug survival of biosimilar infliximab CPT-13 vs. reference infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of switching to the biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is limited research directly comparing the effectiveness, drug survival, and pharmacokinetic profiles of the reference infliximab (IFX) and CT-P13 in real clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and drug survival of CPT-13 and reference IFX at weeks 26 and 52, and to determine the pharmacokinetic profiles and safety profile in real-world settings. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort analysis was conducted at a single center. The study compared the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission and experiencing poor clinical outcomes at weeks 26 and 52. The drug survival rate of CT-P13 and reference infliximab was also assessed during the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included in the study, 39.2% receiving CPT-13 and 60.8% reference IFX. At week 26, clinical remission rates were 66.7% (CPT-13: 74.4% vs. reference IFX: 62.3%, p=0.178), and at week 52, they were 64% (CPT-13: 85.4% vs. reference IFX: 63.0%, p=0.012). Subgroup analysis with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) found no significant differences at week 26 (CPT-13: 74.4% vs. reference IFX: 58.8%, p=0.235) or at week 52 (CPT-13: 85.4% vs. reference IFX: 68.8%, p=0.153). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates comparable efficacy, drug survival, pharmacokinetic profiles, and incidence of immunogenicity between both drugs in a real clinical setting. Further studies with greater statistical power are needed to validate these findings.

The role of anti-HMGB1 antibody and anti-moesin antibody in ANCA-associated vasculitis / Papel de los anticuerpos anti-HMGB1 y antimoesina en la vasculitis asociada a ANCA

Objective The study aims to evaluate the role of anti-high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) antibody and anti-moesin antibody in the diagnosis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) and its possible relationship with the different clinical manifestations. Methods The study involved 60 AAV patients, 58 patients with autoimmune disease other than AAV and 50 healthy subjects. The serum levels of anti-HMGB1 and anti-moesin antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the second determination was made 3 months after treatment of AAV patients. Results Serum levels of anti-HMGB1 and anti-moesin antibodies in AAV group were significantly higher than those in non-AAV group and HC group. The area under the curve (AUC) of anti-HMGB1 and anti-moesin in diagnosing AAV were 0.977 and 0.670, respectively. Anti-HMGB1 levels were significantly elevated in AAV patients with pulmonary involvement, while the concentrations of anti-moesin were significantly increased in patients with renal damage. Anti-moesin were positively correlated with BVAS (r=0.261, P=0.044), creatinine (r=0.296, P=0.024) and negatively correlated with complement C3 (r=−0.363, P=0.013). Besides, anti-moesin levels of active AAV patients were significantly higher than those in inactive patients. The concentrations of serum anti-HMGB1 could be significantly decreased after induction remission treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion Anti-HMGB1 and anti-moesin antibodies play important roles in the diagnosis and prognosis of AAV, which may act as potential disease markers for AAV (AU)

Objetivo El estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar el papel del anticuerpo antigrupo de alta movilidad box 1 (HMGB1) y el anticuerpo antimoesina en el diagnóstico de la vasculitis asociada (VAA) a anticuerpos citoplasmáticos antineutrófilos (ANCA) y su posible relación con las diferentes manifestaciones clínicas. Métodos En el estudio participaron 60 pacientes con VAA, 58 pacientes con enfermedad autoinmune distinta de la VAA y 50 sujetos sanos. Los niveles séricos de anticuerpos anti-HMGB1 y antimoesina se determinaron mediante ensayo inmunoabsorbente ligado a enzimas (ELISA), y la segunda determinación se realizó tres meses después del tratamiento de pacientes con VAA. Resultados Los niveles séricos de anticuerpos anti-HMGB1 y antimoesina en el grupo AAV fueron significativamente más altos que los del grupo sin VAA y el grupo control sanitario. El área bajo la curva (AUC) de anti-HMGB1 y antimoesina en el diagnóstico de VAA fueron 0,977 y 0,670, respectivamente. Los niveles de anti-HMGB1 se elevaron significativamente en pacientes con VAA con afectación pulmonar, mientras que las concentraciones de antimoesina aumentaron significativamente en pacientes con daño renal. La antimoesina se correlacionó positivamente con puntuación de actividad vascular de Birmingham (r=0,261, p=0,044), creatinina (r=0,296, p=0,024) y se correlacionó negativamente con el complemento C3 (r=−0,363, p=0,013). Además, los niveles de antimoesina de los pacientes activos con VAA fueron significativamente más altos que los de los pacientes inactivos. Las concentraciones séricas de anti-HMGB1 podrían disminuir significativamente después del tratamiento de remisión de inducción (p<0,05). Conclusión Los anticuerpos anti-HMGB1 y antimoesina juegan un papel importante en el diagnóstico y pronóstico de VAA, que pueden actuar como marcadores potenciales de enfermedad para VAA (AU)