Corrección de una clase III esqueletal con anclaje óseo en paciente en crecimiento: Reporte de caso / Skeletal class III correction in growing patient with bone anchorage: CaseReport

Antecedentes: La clase III esqueletal, es una deformidad dentofacial donde el tercio inferior de la cara es más prominente, el tratamiento se decide según la etiología y la edad del paciente; si se encuentra en crecimiento la malformación puede ser tratada con un protocolo interceptivo y si es posible evitar la cirugía ortognática a futuro. Objetivo: Mejorar la clase esqueletal, descruzar la mordida u obtener mordida borde a borde, mejorar la posición del labio superior y evaluar el comparativo inicial-final de SNA y ANB. Reporte de caso:Paciente masculino de 13 años, sin antecedentes personales patológicos o familiares reportados; presenta clase III esqueletal responsiva bimaxilar, crecimiento vertical, clase molar I y canina III; fue tratado con el protocolo de mini placas BAMP (bone anchored maxillary protraction) por sus siglas en inglés, elásticos intermaxilares y un paladar con pistas planas. Resultados:La fase ortopédica duro cinco meses y se logró mordida borde a borde y clase I esqueletal. Discusión: Se obtuvieron resultados con el uso de mini implantes sin anclaje extraoral en menos tiempo a comparación de otros métodos que tienen que ser usados por 9-12 meses.Conclusión:El protocolo BAMP puede ser usado en pacientes en crecimiento sin máscara facial para corregir la clase III esqueletal.

Background: Skeletal class III is a dentofacial deformity where the lower third ofthe face is more prominent. The treatment is decided according to the etiology and age of the patient; If the patient is in growing, the malformation can be treated with an interceptive protocol and if possible, avoid a orthognathic surgery in the future. Objective: Improve the skeletal class, uncross the bite or obtain an edge-to-edge bite, improve the position of the upper lip and compare the initial-final relationship of ANS and ANB.Case report:13-year-old male patient, with no reported pathological or family history; presents skeletal class III, vertical growth, molar class I and canine III; he was treated with the protocol of mini BAMP (bone anchored maxillary protraction) plates, intermaxillary elastics and a palate with flat tracks. Results:The orthopedic phase lasted five months and an edge-to-edge bite and skeletal class I were achieved.Discussion:Results were obtained with the use of mini plates without extraoralanchorage in less time compared to other methods that have to be used for 9-12 months. Conclusion: The BAMP protocol can be used in growing patients without a face mask to correct skeletal class III.

Mechanical Evaluation of the Stability of One or Two Miniscrews under Loading on Synthetic Bone.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the primary stability of a two-miniscrew system inserted into a synthetic bone and to compare the system with the traditional one. Forty-five bi-layered polyurethane blocks were used to simulate maxillary cancellous and cortical bone densities. Samples were randomly assigned to three groups-one-miniscrew system (Group A, N = 23), two-miniscrew system (Group B, N = 22) and archwire-only (Group C, N = 10). A total of 67 new miniscrews were subdivided into Group A (23 singles) and Group B (22 couples). 30 mm of 19″ × 25″ archwires were tied to the miniscrew. The load was applied perpendicularly to the archwire. Maximum Load Value (MLV), Yield Load (YL) and Loosening Load (LL) were recorded for each group. The YL of Group B and C had a mean value respectively of 4.189 ± 0.390 N and 3.652 ± 0.064 N. The MLV of Group A, B and C had a mean value respectively of 1.871 ± 0.318N, of 4.843 ± 0.515 N and 4.150 ± 0.086 N. The LL of Group A and B had a mean value respectively of 1.871 ± 0.318 N and of 2.294 ± 0.333 N. A two- temporary anchorage device (TAD) system is on average stiffer than a one-TAD system under orthodontic loading.

The ideal insertion angle after immediate loading in Jeil, Storm, and Thunder miniscrews: A 3D-FEM study.

OBJECTIVE: The miniscrew is effectively used to provide additional anchorage for orthodontic purposes. The aim of this study was to identify an optimal insertion angle for Jeil, Storm, and Thunder miniscrews on stress distribution at the bone miniscrew interface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To perform 3-dimensional finite element model analysis, a 3-dimensional model with a bone block was constructed with type D2 of bone quality, and with miniscrews of Storm, Thunder, Jeil, with the diameter of 2, 1.5. 1.6mm and length 15.9, 12.4, 14.4mm respectively. The miniscrews were inserted at 15° 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90° to the bone surface. A simulated horizontal orthodontic force of 200 gram was applied to the centre of the miniscrews head in all models, and stress distribution and its magnitude were evaluated with a 3-dimensional finite element analysis program. RESULTS: In the cancellous bone, minimum stress was found at placement angles of 90° for Jeil and Storm, which was 0.37 and 0.39MPa respectively, and 15° for Thunder, which was 0.85MPa. The maximum von Mises stresses in the cancellous bone for Jeil was at 60°, which was 0.92MPa, and for Thunder at 90°, which was 1.3MPa. CONCLUSION: Each miniscrew has an ideal insertion angle, optimal insertion positions were found within 90° for Jeil and for Storm but 15° for Thunder. Clinical significance 3-dimensional finite element analysis confirmed that each miniscrew has an ideal insertion angle according to its characteristics.

[Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class â ¢ malocclusion in adolescents].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents. METHODS: Articles relating to the use of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices for treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents were searched from the databases of Cochrane Library, PubMed, EmBase, CNKI, and Wanfang database. Several inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed for the article screening. The clinical data were extracted, and the quality of the selected articles was evaluated. A Meta-analysis of SNA, SNB, ANB, ANS-Me, Wits, and U1-PP change was performed by using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Seven studies (264 patients) were included in the Meta-analysis. Among these studies, three were randomized controlled trials, and four were non-randomized controlled trials. Compared with the maxillary facemask protraction device group, the bone ancho-rage device group had higher SNA changes and lower ANS-Me, Wits, and U1-PP changes (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the SNB and ANB changes between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the maxillary facemask protraction device, the bone anchorage device can increase the extent of protraction of the maxilla and has better controls for the labial inclination of the maxillary anterior teeth in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion among adolescents. However, additional high-quality randomized controlled trials must be performed to verify the results.

Relative contributions of implant hydrophilicity and nanotopography to implant anchorage in bone at Early Time Points.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the contributions of implant hydrophilicity and nanotopography on anchorage in bone. The effect of elevated calcium surface chemistry on bone anchorage was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A full factorial study design was implemented to evaluate the effects of ultraviolet (UV) light and/or sodium lactate (SL) and discrete crystalline deposition of nanocrystals (DCD) treatments on the osseointegration of dual acid-etched (AE) titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) and grit blasted and AE (BAE) commercially pure titanium (CpTi) implants. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH)-treated CpTi implants were immersed in simulated body fluid (SBF) to increase calcium surface chemistry. Implants were placed in the femora of Wistar rats and tested using pull-out testing (BAE implants: 5, 9, 14 days) or tensile testing (AE implants: 9 days, NaOH implants: 28 days). RESULTS: Ti6Al4V-AE implants with DCD- and UV-treated surfaces significantly increased bone anchorage compared with untreated Ti6Al4V-AE alloy implants. Pull-out testing of BAE-CpTi implants with the DCD treatment showed increased disruption force values compared with surfaces without the DCD treatment at 5, 9 and 14 days by 4.1N, 13.9N and 15.5N, respectively, and UV-treated implants showed an increase at 14 days by 8.4N. No difference was found between NaOH + SBF and NaOH + H2 O groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bone anchorage of implants was found to be improved by UV-treating implants or nanotopographically complex surfaces. However, implant nanotopography was found to have a greater contribution to the overall bone anchorage and is more consistent compared with the time-dependent nature of the UV treatment.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents / 华西口腔医学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To assess the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents.@*METHODS@#Articles relating to the use of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices for treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents were searched from the databases of Cochrane Library, PubMed, EmBase, CNKI, and Wanfang database. Several inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed for the article screening. The clinical data were extracted, and the quality of the selected articles was evaluated. A Meta-analysis of SNA, SNB, ANB, ANS-Me, Wits, and U1-PP change was performed by using RevMan 5.3.@*RESULTS@#Seven studies (264 patients) were included in the Meta-analysis. Among these studies, three were randomized controlled trials, and four were non-randomized controlled trials. Compared with the maxillary facemask protraction device group, the bone ancho-rage device group had higher SNA changes and lower ANS-Me, Wits, and U1-PP changes (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the SNB and ANB changes between these two groups.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Compared with the maxillary facemask protraction device, the bone anchorage device can increase the extent of protraction of the maxilla and has better controls for the labial inclination of the maxillary anterior teeth in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion among adolescents. However, additional high-quality randomized controlled trials must be performed to verify the results.

Correction of Class III malocclusion with alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions using a hybrid hyrax-mandibular miniplate combination and simultaneous orthodontic treatment: A case report.

In this report, we describe the successful use of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions with a hybrid hyrax-mandibular miniplate combination and simultaneous orthodontic treatment for the management of severe Class III malocclusion due to maxillary hypoplasia in an 11-year-old girl. The devices were removed after 20 months of treatment, and the family was instructed about a careful control and retention program that should be followed in accordance with the patient's growth. The final result included the correction of Class III malocclusion with adequate function and excellent facial esthetics, which restored the patient's self-esteem and provided personal motivation. The outcomes showed good stability after 24 months of retention. The decrease in the duration of active treatment is the most important finding from the present case. Considering that facial esthetics in adolescence is a determining factor for the development of a personality and interpersonal relationships, we recommend the use of this protocol for growing patients, who will exhibit not only an improved physical appearance but also a better quality of life.

A "best fit" approach for synergistic surface parameters to guide the design of candidate implant surfaces.

Human bone resorption surfaces can provide a template for endosseous implant surface design. We characterized the topography of such sites using four synergistic parameters (fractal dimension, lacunarity, porosity, and surface roughness) and compared the generated values with those obtained from two groups of candidate titanium implant surfaces. For the first group (n = 5/group): grit-blasted acid etched (BAE), BAE with either discrete calcium phosphate crystal deposition or nanotube formation, machined titanium with nanotubes, or a nanofiber surface; each measured synergistic parameter was statistically compared with that of the resorbed bone surface and scored for inclusion in a "best fit" analysis. The analysis informed changes that could be made to a candidate implant surface to render it a closer "best fit" to that of the resorbed bone surface. In a second group of either titanium or titanium alloy implants their micro-topography, created by dual acid etching, was the same for each material substrate; but their nanotopographic complexity was changed by varying the degree of calcium phosphate crystalline deposits. These implants were also used in vivo where bone anchorage was tested using a tensile disruption test; and the "best fit" of synergistic parameters coincided with the best biological outcome for both titanium and titanium alloy implants. In conclusion, the four chosen synergistic parameters can be used to guide the sub-micron surface design of candidate implants, and our "best fit" approach is capable of identifying the surfaces with the best biological outcomes. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 2165-2177, 2019.

Bone-anchored maxillary protraction to correct a class III skeletal relationship: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 218 patients.

This study evaluated the impact of class III correction by elastic traction on four miniplates and the failure rate of bone-anchored miniplates in nonsyndromic patients. A total of 218 patients (112 males and 106 females; average 11.4 years), treated by 38 orthodontists, received four miniplates (total 872 miniplates) from 2008 to 2016 at three maxillofacial centers in two countries. Factors affecting the success and failure of the miniplates were retrospectively examined and skeletal changes on cephalometric radiographs examined for 52 patients. Elastic traction was performed for 22.9 months, on average. The miniplate survival rate was 93.6%; 25.7% of the patients suffered failure of one of the miniplates. Postoperative antibiotics and placement of the neck of the miniplate in the attached gingiva significantly improved the success rate. Miniplate failure was six times higher in the maxilla and occurred more in younger patients. Self-drilling screws were significantly better than self-tapping screws for fixing the miniplate. Small cephalometric changes were seen: SNA (+1.9°), SNB (+0.4°), ANB (+1.4°), Wits analysis (+1.3 mm). In conclusion, bone-anchored maxillary protraction on four miniplates is an effective method for correcting a class III relationship, but has less skeletal effect than previously reported in the literature.

Influence of cortical bone anchorage on the primary stability of dental implants.

PURPOSE: This retrospective chart review study assessed patient records to determine implant insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values during implant placement to evaluate the correlation with cortical bone anchorage (mono- or bicortical). METHODS: Primary stability data (IT during implant placement surgery and ISQ values immediately after implant placement) and cone beam computed tomography of 33 patients (165 implants) were assessed. Patients were divided into the following groups: G1, implants with apical cortical bone contact; G2, implants with bicortical bone contact (apical and cervical regions); and G3, implants with cervical cortical bone contact. RESULTS: Sixty-eight implants were excluded due to cortical bone contact on regions other than implant apical or cervical. Ninety-seven implants were therefore assessed for this study. No implant failure was found after a mean 70.42-month follow-up time. Implants with bicortical anchorage (G2) showed higher IT (64.1 Ncm) during implant placement and higher ISQ values (76) (p < 0.05). Monocortical implants (G1, apical, and G3, cervical) showed similar IT (G1 52.3 and G3 54.3) and ISQ values (G1 71.9 and G3 73) (p > 0.05). No correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient) was found between the two stability measurement devices for the different cortical bone anchorages that were analyzed (G1 0.190, G2 0.039, and G3 - 0.027) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Insertion torque values and implant stability quotients were influenced by cortical bone contact. No significant correlation was found between IT and ISQ values-higher insertion torque values do not necessarily lead to higher implant stability quotients.

The clinical outcome of skeletal anchorage in interceptive treatment (in growing patients) for class III malocclusion.

A systematic review of the literature was performed regarding the clinical outcome (effectiveness) of bone anchorage devices in interceptive treatment for class III malocclusion. A search of Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases yielded 285 papers. An additional two articles were retrieved through manual searching of the reference lists. After initial abstract selection, 32 potentially eligible articles were screened in detail, resulting in a final number of eight articles included in this review. Insufficient evidence was found regarding the effects of skeletal anchorage in interceptive class III treatment to support definitive conclusions on long-term skeletal effects and stability. In the short term, it seems that bone anchors can provide more skeletal effect with less dentoalveolar compensations and less unwanted vertical changes. This does not always exclude the use of a face mask. The use of miniscrews as skeletal anchorage device does not seem to provide more skeletal effect, although it could minimize the unwanted dental effects in the upper jaw. No information regarding the need for orthognathic surgery, orthodontic treatment time or patient compliance and complications was found in the selected articles.

Miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: a review of available systems.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, extensive research has introduced novel ways of reinforcing orthodontic anchorage using a variety of devices temporarily anchored in bone (miniscrews). Currently, there are numerous manufacturers with different miniscrew designs on the market. AIMS: The aim of this paper is to discuss the key design features of different miniscrew systems on the market. Furthermore, to present clinical selection criteria of miniscrews in different settings taking into account the determinant factors. METHODS: Review of the literature was carried out using the following search methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The search was focused on studies published until January 2018. RESULTS: We studied each individual miniscrew from all the identified manufacturers in details. All the features were then summarised and presented as a clinical guideline for the selection of miniscrews. CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we reviewed the development of miniscrews and outlined the general design features of miniscrews as well as specific design features of the current miniscrews in the market. Extensive research of the current products was carried out to help clinicians better understand the difference between the various designs of miniscrews that can be used.

Auricular Prostheses in Microtia.

The progress made in the development of the silicones and percutaneous titanium implants allow for rehabilitation of patients with microtia with an inconspicuous auricular prosthesis. The art of making the prosthesis by the dedicated anaplastologist is the key for the success of this approach. Most patients with microtia desire camouflage. The greatest advantage of the auricular prosthesis is that it can be manufactured as a mirrored replica of the opposite side. The outcome is predictable. Computer science with virtual planning and rapid prototyping is about to revolutionize the process of prosthetic auricular rehabilitation.

Intrusão de molar superior utilizando mini-implantes como ancoragem / Intrusion of supra-erupted molars using mini-implants: Case report

Com o desenvolvimento da ancoragem esquelética, vários dos efeitos colaterais advindos de mecânicas ortodônticas foram minimizados. Entre os movimentos facilitados com o uso destes dispositivos, encontra-se a intrusão de molares. Este trabalho relata dois casos clínicos de intrusão de molares superiores com o auxílio de mini-implantes ortodônticos em pacientes adultos. O tratamento possibilitou a simplificação da mecânica, eliminando a necessidade de cooperação dos pacientes e/ou de um tratamento complexo ou cirúrgico. Os resultados clínicos mostraram intrusão satisfatória dos molares superiores sem evidências de efeitos colaterais indesejáveis.

The orthodontic skeletal anchorage improved some orthodontic movements and several side effects deriving from mechanical orthodontic were minimized. This paper reports two cases of intrusion of upper molars using orthodontic mini-implant as skeletal anchorage. The adult patients present for orthodontic treatment previous oral rehabilitation. The treatments were fast and simple because some biomechanical principles were used to became possible the simplification of mechanics and eliminating the need for patient cooperation. The clinical results showed satisfactory upper molar intrusion with no evidence of undesirable side effects.

Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface.

We sought to explore the biological mechanisms by which endosseous implant surface topography contributes to bone anchorage. To address this experimentally, we implanted five groups of custom-made commercially pure titanium implants of varying surface topographical complexity in rat femora for 9 days; subjected them to mechanical testing; and then examined the interfacial bone matrix by electron microscopy. The five implant surfaces were prepared by combinations of dual acid etching and grit blasting the titanium substrates and, in some cases, modifying the created surfaces with the deposition of nanocrystals of calcium phosphate, which resulted in 10 samples per group. In parallel, we cultured rat bone marrow cells on surrogate implants constructed from polymer resin coated with the same calcium phosphate nanocrystals, and monitored the deposition of bone sialoprotein by transmission electron immunohisto-micrography. We found that implant samples modified with sub-micron scale crystals were bone-bonding, as described by the interdigitation of a mineralized cement line matrix with the underlying implant surface. The in vitro assay showed that bone sialoprotein could be deposited in the interstices between, and undercuts below, the nanocrystals. In addition, when mineralized, the cement line matrix globules occupied micron-sized pits in the implant surfaces, and in part obliterated them, creating an additional form of anchorage. Our results also showed that collagen, elaborated by the osteogenic cells, wrapped around the coarse-micron features, and became mineralized in the normal course of bone formation. This provided a mechanism by which coarse-micron implant features contributed to a functional interface, which we have previously described, that is capable of resisting the mechanical loading that increases as peri-implant bone matures. Thus, our findings provide mechanistic explanations for the biologically-relevant criteria that can be employed to assess the importance of implant surface topography at different scale-ranges.

Efectividad del anclaje esquelético temporal para el cierre de espacios: Revisión sistemática de literatura / Effectiveness of temporary skeletal anchorage for space closure:A systematic review

Introducción y Objetivo: El manejo del anclaje es fundamental para el éxito del tratamiento en ortodoncia fi ja, sin embargo no hay consenso acerca de la efectividad del anclaje esquelético para la retracción de los dientes anteriores. El objetivo fue evaluar la efectividad del anclaje esquelético para el cierre de espacios en el arco maxilar.Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de literatura a partir de las bases de datos PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane, Scielo. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos controlados, donde el anclaje esquelético fuera utilizado para el cierre de espacios; tresrevisores analizaron los resúmenes y textos completos para considerar el cumplimiento de los criterios de inclusión y exclusión de manera independiente, en un formato de extracción de datos.Resultados: Se identifi caron 324 artículos, de los cuales 316 fueron rechazados después de la evaluación, de los ocho estudios inicialmente seleccionados, cinco fueron excluidos. Sólo tres estudios cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se realizó un metanálisis con el método de efectos aleatorios para el movimiento mesial del molar superior, en el cual los dispositivos de anclaje esquelético temporal mostraron ser más efectivos en el control del anclaje en -2,72 mm (-4,10,- 1,33 IC95%) al compararlos con los métodos de anclaje ortodóntico convencional, esta diferencia fue estadísticamente signifi cativa. Conclusiones: El anclaje esquelético temporal parece ser más efectivo para controlar el movimiento mesial del molar durante el cierre de espacios, comparado con el anclaje ortodóntico convencional, sin embargo la evidencia científi ca en la literatura es escasa.

Introduction and Objetive: Anchorage management is essential for successful fi xed orthodontic treatment; however there is no consensus about the effectiveness of skeletal anchorage for anterior teeth retraction. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of skeletal anchorage forspace closure in the maxillary arch. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in PubMed, Cochrane, Lilacs, Scielo databases. Controlled clinical trials were included, where skeletal anchorage was used for space closure. Three reviewers examined the abstracts and full texts to determine fulfi llment of the inclusion and exclusion criteria independently in a data extraction form. Results: 324 papers, out of which 316 were excluded after the evaluation of title and abstract of the eight initially selected trials. Only three trials met the inclusion criteria.A meta-analysis was performed with a random effects method for the mesial movement of upper molars in which the temporary skeletal anchorage devices showed to be more signifi cantly moreeffective in controlling anchorage -2,7 mm (-4,10,-1,33 CI 95%) when compared to the conventionalanchorage control methods.Conclusions: Temporary skeletal anchorage seems to be more effective in controlling the movement of molars during mesial space closure, when compared to the conventional orthodontic anchorage although evidence in the literature is limited.