Birth Brachial Plexus Palsy: An Indian Perspective.

Birth brachial plexus palsy (BBPP) is an unfortunate outcome of a difficult labor, which can often lead to long-lasting upper limb impairments. Spontaneous recovery may or may not occur. Timely diagnosis of the condition and initiation of the appropriate treatment can be instrumental in decreasing the functional impact. The management begins right from the day the child presents first and ranges from physiotherapy to surgical intervention such as nerve repair/transfer or grafts. The sequelae of the condition are also quite common and need to be detected preemptively with initiation of appropriate treatment. However, prevention is the key to reducing the incidence of secondary deformities. In this study, the team of authors, based on their considerable experience, discuss their approach to the management of BBPP. This is done in the background of Indian cultural practices and social constraints. A detailed discussion has been done on importance of preoperative passive joint mobilization regime and role of botulinum toxin in the authors' preferred ways of surgical correction of primary as well as secondary deformities. An extensive review of peer-reviewed publications has been done in this study, including clinical papers, review articles, and systematic review of the subject. Good results are possible with early and appropriate intervention even in severe cases.

Indications and Technique for the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Brachial Plexus Surgery.

Confirming the presence or absence of a functioning nerve root in traumatic brachial plexus injuries is vital in the surgical decision-making process. Intraoperative neuromonitoring can confirm intact rootlets with the use of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials. The purpose of this article is to describe the rationale and details of intraoperative neuromonitoring to provide a basic understanding of its role in decision-making in patients with brachial plexus injuries.

Differences in the perspectives of functioning and health in the ICF model between patients with brachial plexus birth injury and their parents versus healthcare professionals.

PURPOSE: To explore and compare the perspectives of patients and their parents (PPs) with a brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) with those of health care professionals (HCPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a study using a questionnaire among PPs and HCPs. Importance of different outcome categories was scored on a Likert scale. Items were linked to corresponding categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Means were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Data were collected from 184 patients and 65 HCPs. We found a difference in 7/14 outcome categories between joint PP groups and HCPs. Parents scored outcome evaluation categories as more important than patients, categories filled out together by patient and parent scored in between (p < 0.05). The majority of PPs and HCPs rated outcome assessment as important in more domains than "Body functions" and "Body structures". The biggest difference was found in the importance of evaluation of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome assessment in the domains "Activities and participation" and "Environmental factors" was rated as important by both PPs and HCPs. Evaluation of pain was more often scored as important by PPs. Different domains seem to be underestimated by HCPs and need more attention during consultation. Implications for rehabilitationThe importance of outcome evaluation concerning "Pain", "Interaction with peers", and "Interaction with medical and paramedical specialists" should be taken into account in the rehabilitation for this specific group of patients and their parents (PPs).Comparison of perspectives on functioning between brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) PPs and health care professionals.Outcome assessment in domains "Activities and participation" and "Environmental factors" is important.Health care professionals undervalue the importance of pain evaluation in BPBI as compared with PPs.

Magnetic Resonance as a Method for Diagnosis for Traumatic Lesions by Brachial Plexus Avulsion.

Objective The incidence of traumatic brachial plexus injuries has been increasing considerably in Brazil, mainly due to the increase in the number of motorcycle accidents. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of brachial plexus avulsion lesions, comparing it with the findings of physical and intraoperative examination. Methods A total of 16 patients with brachial plexus injury were prospectively evaluated and treated at the hand surgery outpatient clinic from our service. All patients underwent MRI of the brachial plexus, and the findings were inserted on a table, as well as the physical examination data, and part of the patients had the plexus evaluated intraoperatively. Results In the present study, the accuracy of MRI in the identification of root avulsion was 100%, with 100% sensitivity and specificity when comparing imaging with surgical findings. Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging showed high sensitivity and specificity, confirmed by intraoperative findings, which allows considering this test as the gold standard in the diagnosis of avulsion in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

Magnetic Resonance as a Method for Diagnosis for Traumatic Lesions by Brachial Plexus Avulsion / Ressonância magnética como método para diagnóstico das lesões traumáticas por avulsão do plexo braquial

Abstract Objective The incidence of traumatic brachial plexus injuries has been increasing considerably in Brazil, mainly due to the increase in the number of motorcycle accidents. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of brachial plexus avulsion lesions, comparing it with the findings of physical and intraoperative examination. Methods A total of 16 patients with brachial plexus injury were prospectively evaluated and treated at the hand surgery outpatient clinic from our service. All patients underwent MRI of the brachial plexus, and the findings were inserted on a table, as well as the physical examination data, and part of the patients had the plexus evaluated intraoperatively. Results In the present study, the accuracy of MRI in the identification of root avulsion was 100%, with 100% sensitivity and specificity when comparing imaging with surgical findings. Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging showed high sensitivity and specificity, confirmed by intraoperative findings, which allows considering this test as the gold standard in the diagnosis of avulsion in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.

Resumo Objetivo A incidência de lesões traumáticas do plexo braquial vem aumentando consideravelmente no Brasil, principalmente devido ao aumento do número de acidentes de motocicleta. O objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar a sensibilidade e a especificidade da ressonância magnética (RM) no diagnóstico das lesões por avulsão do plexo braquial, comparando com os achados do exame físico e do intraoperatório. Métodos Foram avaliados prospectivamente 16 pacientes com lesão do plexo braquial atendidos no ambulatório de cirurgia da mão de nosso serviço. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos ao exame de RM do plexo braquial e os achados foram inseridos em uma tabela, assim como os dados do exame físico, e parte dos pacientes teve o plexo avaliado intraoperatoriamente. Resultados No presente estudo, a acurácia da RM na identificação de avulsão de raízes foi de 100%, com 100% de sensibilidade e especificidade comparando-se achados da imagem e cirúrgicos. Conclusão A RM mostrou alta sensibilidade e especificidade, confirmadas por achados intraoperatórios, o que permite considerar este exame como padrão outro no diagnóstico de avulsão nas lesões traumáticas do plexo braquial.

Alternativa factible para la neuroestimulación intraoperatoria durante la cirugía del plexo braquial / Feasible alternative for intraoperative neurostimulation during brachial plexus surgery

Introducción: La neuroestimulación intraoperatoria constituye una técnica esencial durante la cirugía del plexo braquial, pues permite la identificación específica de las estructuras neurales. En determinadas circunstancias, la intensidad precisa de la estimulación nerviosa y la respuesta motora evocada, las cuales son fundamentales para la toma de decisiones críticas durante el acto quirúrgico. Objetivo: Describir la utilización de un neuroestimulador de anestesia regional para la localización neural intraoperatoria durante la cirugía del plexo braquial en dos pacientes. Presentación de casos: Caso 1: paciente con diagnóstico de lesión del fascículo lateral del plexo braquial derecho y lesión alta del nervio radial homolateral. La estimulación neural, con estímulos graduales y progresivos, permite la diferenciación adecuada de los nervios mediano, cubital, musculocutáneo y cutáneo braquial lateral, el fascículo motor del nervio cubital que inerva el músculo cubital anterior, y el fascículo motor del nervio musculocutáneo que inerva el bíceps, lo que posibilita la neurotización entre ambos fascículos. Caso 2: paciente con diagnóstico de lesión total del plexo braquial izquierdo, posganglionar. Luego de la exploración y neurólisis, se identificó el tronco superior, se efectuó la estimulación eléctrica gradual, lo que requirió una elevada intensidad, y se registó, únicamente, como respuesta motora evocada la contracción débil del músculo pectoral mayor ipsilateral. Conclusiones: La utilización de un neuroestimulador de anestesia regional para la localización neural durante la cirugía del plexo braquial, presenta ventajas prácticas relevantes en relación con los neuroestimuladores desechables, así como una relación costo-beneficio apropiada para su implementación en entornos y naciones de recursos limitados(AU)

Introduction: Intraoperative neurostimulation is an essential technique during brachial plexus surgery, as it allows the specific identification of neural structures. In certain circumstances, the precise intensity of nerve stimulation and the evoked motor response are fundamental for making critical decisions during the surgical act. Objective: Describe the use of a neurostimulator of regional anaesthesia for intraoperative neural localization during brachial plexus surgery in two patients. Case presentation: Case 1: patient diagnosed with lesion of the lateral fasciculus of the right brachial plexus and high lesion of the homolateral radial nerve. Neural stimulation, with gradual and progressive stimuli, allows the adequate differentiation of the median, ulnar, musculocutaneous and lateral brachial cutaneous nerves, the motor fasciculus of the ulnar nerve that innervates the anterior ulnar muscle, and the motor fasciculus of the musculocutaneous nerve that innervates the biceps, which enables neurotization between both fascicles. Case 2: patient diagnosed with total lesion of the left brachial plexus, postganglionic. After the exploration and neurolysis, the upper trunk was identified, the gradual electrical stimulation was carried out, which required a high intensity, and the weak contraction of the ipsilateral pectoralis major muscle was recorded only as an evoked motor response. Conclusions: The use of a neurostimulator of regional anesthesia for neural localization during brachial plexus surgery presents relevant practical advantages in relation to disposable neurostimulators, as well as an appropriate cost-benefit ratio for their implementation in environments and nations of limited resources(AU)

Sir William Thorburn and the first published report of the surgical repair of a brachial plexus injury.

This historical vignette presents some aspects of the life of the English surgeon Sir William Thorburn and details of the first published report of the surgical repair of a brachial plexus stretch injury in an adult.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus. Part 2: Traumatic injuries.

The most common indications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brachial plexus (BP) are traumatic injuries. The role of MRI of the BP has increased because of recent trends favoring earlier surgery. Determining preganglionic vs. postganglionic injury is essential, as different treatment strategies are required. Thus, MRI of the BP should be supplemented with cervical spine MRI to assess the intradural part of the spinal nerves, including highly T2-weighted techniques. Acute preganglionic injuries usually manifest as various combinations of post-traumatic pseudomeningocele, the absence of roots, deformity of nerve root sleeves, displacement of the spinal cord, hemorrhage in the spinal canal, presence of scars in the spinal canal, denervation of the back muscles, and syrinx. Spinal nerve root absence is more specific than pseudomeningocele on MRI. Acute postganglionic injuries can present as lesions in continuity or tears. The following signs indicate injury to the BP: side-to-side difference, swelling, partial, or total BP rupture. Injury patterns and localization are associated with the mechanism of trauma, which implies a significant role for MRI in the work-up of patients. The identification and description of traumatic lesions involving the brachial plexus need to be systematic and detailed. Using an appropriate MRI protocol, obtaining details about the injury, applying a systematic anatomical approach, and correlating imaging findings to relevant clinical data to make a correct diagnosis. Information about the presence or suspicion of root avulsion should always be provided.

Non-union of the Clavicle Osteotomy Site in an Infant with Birth Brachial Plexus Palsy.

Non-union of the clavicle in the paediatric population is extremely rare. Some anecdotal case reports show non-union following clavicle fracture. However, we could not find any report of non-union following osteotomy for brachial plexus surgery. We report non-union of clavicle following its osteotomy for brachial plexus exploration surgery in a 6-month child. We present successful management of the clavicle non-union in this patient and propose preventive steps. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Nerve autofluorescence under near-ultraviolet light: cutting-edge technology for intra-operative neural tissue visualization in 17 patients.

BACKGROUND: Nerve visualization and the identification of other neural tissues during surgery is crucial for numerous reasons, including the prevention of iatrogenic nerve and neural structure injury and facilitation of nerve repair. However, current methods of intra-operative nerve detection are generally expensive, unproven, and/or technically challenging. Recently, we have documented, in both in vivo animal models and ex vivo human tissue, that nerves autofluorescence when viewed in near-ultraviolet light (NUV). In this paper, we describe our use of nerve autofluorescence to facilitate the visualization of nerves and other neural tissues intra-operatively in 17 patients undergoing a range of surgical procedures. METHODS: Employing the same prototype axon imaging system previously documented to markedly enhance nerve visualization in both in vivo animal and ex vivo human models, surgical fields were observed in 17 patients under both white and NUV light during parotid tumor resection (n = 3), thyroid tumor resection (n = 7), and surgery for peripheral nerve and spinal tumors and injury (n = 7). RESULTS: In all 17 patients, the intra-operative use of the imaging system both was feasible and markedly enhanced the localization of all neural tissues throughout their course within the surgical field. All 17 procedures were successful and devoid of any peri-operative complications or post-operative neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-operatively visualizing auto-fluorescent peripheral nerves and other neural tissues under NUV light is feasible in human patients across a range of clinical scenarios and appears to appreciably enhance nerve and other neural tissue visualization. Controlled studies to explore this technology further are needed.

Manejo de heridas en plexo braquial por proyectil de arma de fuego: revisión sistemática / Management of gunshot wound to the brachial plexus: a systematic review

Introducción y objetivo: Según estudios realizados por el Centro de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad Estatal de Luisiana (EE.UU.), la prevalencia de lesiones por proyectil de arma de fuego en el plexo braquial es del 12%.Nuestro estudio tiene como objetivo señalar cuál es el tratamiento quirúrgico más utilizado para la restauración del plexo braquial lesionado por proyectil de arma de fuego según la bibliografía revisada, identificar el manejo quirúrgico con mayor porcentaje de restauración funcional y precisar qué nervios cervicales están más expuestos a heridas de bala.Material y método.Revisión sistemática basada en la guía de Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Los criterios de inclusión fueron: investigaciones sobre heridas por proyectil de arma de fuego en el plexo braquial publicadas entre 2010-2020, disponibles en los idiomas español y/o inglés y disponibles en texto completo gratuito. Las bases de datos revisadas fueron: PubMed, SciELO y ScienceDirect.Resultados.El tratamiento quirúrgico más utilizado para este tipo de lesiones es la neurolisis con un 65%, dejando en segundo lugar a la neurotización con un 59%. En cuanto a la recuperación del paciente por neurolisis es de un 90.4% y por injerto de nervios es de un 85.7%. Algunos pacientes presentaron lesiones vasculares junto a las lesiones por proyectil de arma de fuego en el plexo braquial.Conclusiones.Las lesiones traumáticas de plexo braquial son relativamente poco frecuentes pero producen una severa disfunción del miembro superior, generando gran morbilidad en los pacientes que las sufren. (AU)

Background and objective: According to studies conducted by the Louisiana State University Center for Health Sciences (USA), the prevalence of gunshot injuries to the brachial plexus is 12%.Our aim is to indicate which is the most used surgical treatment for the restoration of the brachial plexus injured by a firearm projectile according to the bibliography reviewed, identify the surgical management with the highest percentage of functional restoration and specify which cervical nerves tend to be more exposed to gunshot wounds.Methods.This study is a systematic review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were: research on gunshot wounds in the brachial plexus published within the 2010-2020 period, available in Spanish and / or English and which will be available in full text for free. The databases reviewed were: PubMed, SciELO and ScienceDirect.Results.The most widely used surgical treatment for this type of injury is neurolysis with 65%, leaving neurotization in second place with 59%. Regarding the recovery of the patient due to neurolysis it is 90.4% and due to nerve grafting it is 85.7%. Some patients presented vascular injuries in conjunction with gunshot injuries to the brachial plexus.Conclusions.Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are relatively rare, but they produce severe upper limb dysfunction, generating great morbidity in patients suffering from this type of injury. (AU)

Evidence that nerve surgery improves functional outcome for obstetric brachial plexus injury.

The majority of children with obstetric brachial plexus injury show some degree of spontaneous recovery. This review explores the available evidence for the use surgical brachial plexus repair to improve outcome. So far, no randomized trial has been performed to evaluate the usefulness of nerve repair. The evidence level of studies comparing surgical treatment with non-surgical treatment is Level IV at best. The studies on natural history that are used for comparison with surgical series are also, unfortunately, of too low quality. Among experts, however, the general agreement is that nerve reconstruction is indicated when spontaneous recovery is absent or severely delayed at specific time points. A major obstacle in comparing or pooling obstetric brachial plexus injury patient series, either surgical or non-surgical, is the use of many different outcome measures. A requirement for multicentre studies is consensus on how to assess and report outcome, both concerning motor performance and functional evaluation.

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF TRAUMATIC BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURIES.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an epidemiological study on brachial plexus injuries, through data collection of patients treated in the Hospital São Paulo, which is the referral center for high complexity in this region. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with a review of the electronic medical records of the Hospital, from August 2008 to June 2013. RESULTS: We estimated an 1.88/100,000 annual incidence, considering that the Hospital is the only referral center for brachial plexus injuries. The mean time between injury and the first visit to the reference hospital was 8.25 months. The mean time interval between injury and surgery was 11.25 months. The percentage of total injuries was 33%, while the upper and middle trunk injuries were 33% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed many aspects in common with those reported by other centers of excellence in Brazil such as: sex, age and mechanism of injury. However, some findings were different from most other epidemiological studies, namely: level of injury, time between the accident and the first appointment and the time between injury and surgery. Level of evidence IV, case series.

OBJETIVO: Realizar um estudo epidemiológico das lesões do plexo braquial através do levantamento de dados dos pacientes atendidos no Hospital de referência para alta complexidade da região metropolitana de São Paulo. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo com avaliação dos prontuários eletrônicos do HMC-SA, de agosto de 2008 até junho de 2013. RESULTADOS: Levando-se em consideração que o Hospital é o único centro de referência para lesões do plexo braquial, chegamos a uma incidência anual estimada em 1,88/100.000 habitantes. A média de tempo entre a lesão e a primeira consulta no hospital foi de 8,25 meses. O intervalo de tempo entre a lesão e a cirurgia foi em média de 11,25 meses. A porcentagem de lesões totais foi de 33%, enquanto as lesões de tronco superior e tronco superior e médio foram de 33% e 28%, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: Observamos muitos aspectos em comum com os relatados por outros centros de referência no Brasil, tais como: gênero, idade e mecanismo de trauma. No entanto, alguns achados foram diferentes da maioria dos outros estudos epidemiológicos: nível de lesão, tempo decorrido entre o acidente e o primeiro atendimento e o intervalo de tempo entre a lesão e o tratamento cirúrgico. Nível de evidência IV, série de casos.

Epidemiological study of traumatic brachial plexus injuries / Estudo epidemiológico das lesões traumáticas do plexo braquial

ABSTRACT Objective: To conduct an epidemiological study on brachial plexus injuries, through data collection of patients treated in the Hospital São Paulo, which is the referral center for high complexity in this region. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with a review of the electronic medical records of the Hospital, from August 2008 to June 2013. Results: We estimated an 1.88/100,000 annual incidence, considering that the Hospital is the only referral center for brachial plexus injuries. The mean time between injury and the first visit to the reference hospital was 8.25 months. The mean time interval between injury and surgery was 11.25 months. The percentage of total injuries was 33%, while the upper and middle trunk injuries were 33% and 28%, respectively. Conclusion: We observed many aspects in common with those reported by other centers of excellence in Brazil such as: sex, age and mechanism of injury. However, some findings were different from most other epidemiological studies, namely: level of injury, time between the accident and the first appointment and the time between injury and surgery. Level of evidence IV, case series.

RESUMO Objetivo: Realizar um estudo epidemiológico das lesões do plexo braquial através do levantamento de dados dos pacientes atendidos no Hospital de referência para alta complexidade da região metropolitana de São Paulo. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo com avaliação dos prontuários eletrônicos do HMC-SA, de agosto de 2008 até junho de 2013. Resultados: Levando-se em consideração que o Hospital é o único centro de referência para lesões do plexo braquial, chegamos a uma incidência anual estimada em 1,88/100.000 habitantes. A média de tempo entre a lesão e a primeira consulta no hospital foi de 8,25 meses. O intervalo de tempo entre a lesão e a cirurgia foi em média de 11,25 meses. A porcentagem de lesões totais foi de 33%, enquanto as lesões de tronco superior e tronco superior e médio foram de 33% e 28%, respectivamente. Conclusão: Observamos muitos aspectos em comum com os relatados por outros centros de referência no Brasil, tais como: gênero, idade e mecanismo de trauma. No entanto, alguns achados foram diferentes da maioria dos outros estudos epidemiológicos: nível de lesão, tempo decorrido entre o acidente e o primeiro atendimento e o intervalo de tempo entre a lesão e o tratamento cirúrgico. Nível de evidência IV, série de casos.

Restoration of shoulder external rotation by means of the infraspinatus muscle reinnervation with a radial nerve branch transfer.

Background: Although reinnervation of the suprascapular nerve is frequently obtained through brachial plexus surgery, reestablishment of infraspinatus muscle function is rarely achieved.Methods: The viability of transfer of the radial nerve to the nerve branch to the infraspinatus muscle was determined anatomically, including histomorphometrical analysis on 30 adult cadavers. Eleven adult patients were then treated using the proposed nerve transfer.Results: The branch to the medial head was more suitable for the nerve transfer. In one cadaver, nerve transfer was impossible because there was no donor of sufficient length. According to axon counts, the branches to the lateral and medial heads had sufficient numbers of axons (means = 994.2 ± 447.6 and 1030.8 ± 258.5, respectively) for reinnervation of the branch to the infraspinatus (means = 830.2 ± 241.2 axons). In the surgical series, one patient was lost in the follow-up and only two patients achieved a good result from the transfer. Recovery of external shoulder rotation started 14 months after surgery in one patient and 8 months in the other. The first patient reached 90° of external rotation 6 months later and the second, achieved 120°of shoulder external rotation 6 months after surgery . Four other patients recovered small amounts of movement: 20, 35, 40 and 45°.Conclusions: Although anatomically feasible, the proposed nerve transfer resulted in a small number of good clinical outcomes.

Lower subscapular nerve transfer for axillary nerve repair in upper brachial plexus palsy.

BACKGROUND: The potential to utilize the lower subscapular nerve for brachial plexus surgery has been suggested in many anatomical studies. However, we know of no studies in the literature describing the use of the lower subscapular nerve for axillary nerve reconstruction to date. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of this nerve transfer in patients with upper brachial plexus palsy. METHODS: Of 1340 nerve reconstructions in 568 patients with brachial plexus injury performed by the senior author (P.H.), a subset of 18 patients underwent axillary nerve reconstruction using the lower subscapular nerve and constitutes the patient group for this study. The median age was 48 years, and the median time between trauma and surgery was 6 months. A concomitant radial nerve injury was found in 8 patients. RESULTS: Thirteen patients completed a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. Successful deltoid recovery was defined as (1) muscle strength MRC grade ≥ 3, (2) electromyographic signs of reinnervation, and (3) increase in deltoid muscle mass. Axillary nerve reconstruction was successful in 9 of 13 patients, which represents a success rate of 69.2%. No significant postoperative weakness of shoulder internal rotation or adduction was observed after transecting the lower subscapular nerve. CONCLUSIONS: The lower subscapular nerve can be used as a safe and effective neurotization tool for upper brachial plexus injury, having a success rate of 69.2% for axillary nerve repair. Our technique presents a suitable alternative for patients with concomitant radial nerve injury.

A New Surgical Technique for Internal Shoulder Contractures Secondary to Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury: An Anterior Coracohumeral Ligament Release.

Background Obstetric brachial plexus injuries result from traction injury during delivery; 30% of these children sustain persisting functional limitations related to an external rotation deficit of the shoulder. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative gain in external rotation after a posterior subscapular release and an anterior coracohumeral ligament release. Methods This is a prospective study on 102 children with an internal rotation contracture of the shoulder who received either a posterior subscapular release (posterior skin incision along the medial border of the scapula of 3-5 cm) or an anterior (5-mm skin incision) coracohumeral ligament release between 1996 and 2010. After general anesthesia, internal and external rotations in both adduction and abduction were measured before and after the surgical release. Results After a posterior subscapular release, the intraoperative external rotation improved with a mean of 64 degrees (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54-74; p < 0.001) in adduction and with a mean of 41 degrees (95% CI: 32-49; p < 0.001) in abduction. After an anterior coracohumeral ligament release, external rotation increased with a mean of 61 degrees (95% CI: 56-66; p < 0.001) in adduction and a mean of 42 degrees in abduction (95%CI: 39-45, p < 0.001). Differences between these two groups were not statistically different. Conclusion The anterior release technique shows comparable results with the posterior subscapular release. And since it is performed through a smaller incision of 5 mm, this is our preferred method to increase passive external rotation. Level of evidence II.

Functional outcome of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to restore shoulder function: Results in upper and complete traumatic brachial plexus palsy in adults.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder stability, abduction and external rotation are vital for the performance of usual daily tasks. AIMS: To compare the functional outcomes in the shoulder following spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer (SASNT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparison of the outcome of adult patients with upper traumatic brachial plexus palsy undergoing SASNT with patients with complete palsy submitted to the same procedure. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Ranges of motion were compared via the Mann-Whitney U test. The percentages of patients with a favorable outcome were compared by the chi-square test. All tests were two-tailed and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: SASNT was performed in 76 patients: 23 cases (30.2%) of upper-plexus injuries and 53 cases (69.7%) of complete brachial plexus palsy. Good shoulder abduction was achieved in 15 patients (65.2%) with upper plexus palsy and a good external rotation in 5 (21.7%). In those patients with a good recovery, the average range of motion (ROM) was 53° for shoulder abduction and 71.2° for external rotation. Thirty-six patients (67.9%) with complete palsy had a good shoulder abduction recovery with 30.7° of average ROM, but only 3 patients (5.6%) recovered a good shoulder external rotation with 68.3° of average ROM. There was no statistical difference for the abduction outcome, but the external rotation outcome was superior in the upper plexus palsy group. CONCLUSION: SASNT is a consistent procedure to achieve functional recovery of shoulder abduction after a partial or complete plexus injury, but the outcomes of external rotation were quite disappointing in both the groups.

Correlation between the elbow flexion and the hand and wrist flexion after neurotization of the fascicles of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch to the biceps.

OBJECTIVE: Gain in elbow flexion in patients with brachial plexus injury is extremely important. The transfer of a fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin surgery) is a treatment option. However, in some patients, gain in elbow flexion is associated with wrist and finger flexion. This study aimed to assess the frequency of this association and the functional behavior of the limb. METHODS: Case-control study of 18 patients who underwent the Oberlin surgery. Group 1 included patients without disassociation of range of elbow flexion and that of the fingers and wrist; Group 2 included patients in whom this disassociation was present. In the functional evaluation, the Sollerman and DASH tests were used. RESULTS: It was observed that 38.89% of the patients did not present disassociation of elbow flexion with flexion of the wrist and fingers. Despite the existence of a favorable difference in the group with disassociation of the movement, when the Sollerman protocol was applied to the comparison between both groups, this difference was not statistically significant. With the DASH test, however, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of the group of patients who managed to disassociate the movement. CONCLUSION: The association of elbow flexion with flexion of the wrist and fingers, in the group studied, was shown to be a frequent event, which influenced the functional result of the affected limb.

OBJETIVO: O ganho da flexão do cotovelo em pacientes com lesão no plexo braquial é de suma importância. A cirurgia de transferência de fascículo do nervo ulnar para ramo motor do nervo musculocutâneo (cirurgia de Oberlin) é uma opção de tratamento. Contudo, o ganho da flexão do cotovelo, em alguns pacientes, vem associado à flexão do punho e dos dedos. O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar a frequência dessa associação e o comprometimento funcional do membro. MÉTODOS: Estudo tipo caso-controle de 18 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de Oberlin. No Grupo 1 foram incluídos os pacientes que não apresentavam dissociação do ganho da flexão do cotovelo com a dos dedos e do punho; no Grupo 2, os pacientes em que havia dissociação. Os testes de Sollerman e Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Dash) foram usados na avaliação funcional. RESULTADOS: Observou-se que 38,89% dos pacientes não dissociavam flexão de cotovelo de flexão de punho e dos dedos. Apesar de existir uma diferença favorável ao grupo que dissociava o movimento quando aplicado o protocolo de Sollerman na comparação entre os pacientes dos dois grupos, essa não se mostrou estatisticamente significante. Já no teste Dash, observou-se diferença estatisticamente significante, favorável ao grupo de pacientes que consegue dissociar o movimento. CONCLUSÃO: A associação da flexão do cotovelo com a flexão de punho e dos dedos no grupo estudado mostrou ser um evento frequente, teve influência no resultado funcional do membro acometido.

Correlation between the elbow flexion and the hand and wrist flexion after neurotization of the fascicles of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch to the biceps / Correlação da flexão do cotovelo com a flexão da mão e do punho após neurotização dos fascículos do nervo ulnar para ramo motor do bíceps

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Gain in elbow flexion in patients with brachial plexus injury is extremely important. The transfer of a fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin surgery) is a treatment option. However, in some patients, gain in elbow flexion is associated with wrist and finger flexion. This study aimed to assess the frequency of this association and the functional behavior of the limb. METHODS: Case-control study of 18 patients who underwent the Oberlin surgery. Group 1 included patients without disassociation of range of elbow flexion and that of the fingers and wrist; Group 2 included patients in whom this disassociation was present. In the functional evaluation, the Sollerman and DASH tests were used. RESULTS: It was observed that 38.89% of the patients did not present disassociation of elbow flexion with flexion of the wrist and fingers. Despite the existence of a favorable difference in the group with disassociation of the movement, when the Sollerman protocol was applied to the comparison between both groups, this difference was not statistically significant. With the DASH test, however, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of the group of patients who managed to disassociate the movement. CONCLUSION: The association of elbow flexion with flexion of the wrist and fingers, in the group studied, was shown to be a frequent event, which influenced the functional result of the affected limb.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: O ganho da flexão do cotovelo em pacientes com lesão no plexo braquial é de suma importância. A cirurgia de transferência de fascículo do nervo ulnar para ramo motor do nervo musculocutâneo (cirurgia de Oberlin) é uma opção de tratamento. Contudo, o ganho da flexão do cotovelo, em alguns pacientes, vem associado à flexão do punho e dos dedos. O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar a frequência dessa associação e o comprometimento funcional do membro. MÉTODOS: Estudo tipo caso-controle de 18 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de Oberlin. No Grupo 1 foram incluídos os pacientes que não apresentavam dissociação do ganho da flexão do cotovelo com a dos dedos e do punho; no Grupo 2, os pacientes em que havia dissociação. Os testes de Sollerman e Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Dash) foram usados na avaliação funcional. RESULTADOS: Observou-se que 38,89% dos pacientes não dissociavam flexão de cotovelo de flexão de punho e dos dedos. Apesar de existir uma diferença favorável ao grupo que dissociava o movimento quando aplicado o protocolo de Sollerman na comparação entre os pacientes dos dois grupos, essa não se mostrou estatisticamente significante. Já no teste Dash, observou-se diferença estatisticamente significante, favorável ao grupo de pacientes que consegue dissociar o movimento. CONCLUSÃO: A associação da flexão do cotovelo com a flexão de punho e dos dedos no grupo estudado mostrou ser um evento frequente, teve influência no resultado funcional do membro acometido.