Clinically Asymptomatic Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Infants with Single-Ventricle Physiology.

OBJECTIVES: To assess clinically asymptomatic infants with single-ventricle physiology (SVP) for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in the supine and car seat positions using polysomnography. Polysomnography results also were compared with results of a standard Car Seat Challenge to measure the dependability of the standard Car Seat Challenge. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational study of 15 infants with SVP. Polysomnography data included Obstructive Index, Central Index, Arousal Index, Apnea Hypopnea Index, and sleep efficiency. Polysomnography heart rate and oxygen saturation data were used to compare polysomnography with the standard Car Seat Challenge. RESULTS: Polysomnography demonstrated that all 15 infants had SDB and 14 had obstructive sleep apnea (Obstructive Index ≥1/hour) in both the supine and car seat positions. Infants with SVP had a statistically significant greater median Obstructive Index in the car seat compared with supine position (6.3 vs 4.2; P = .03), and median spontaneous Arousal Index was greater in the supine position compared with the car seat (20.4 vs 15.2; P = .01). Comparison of polysomnography to standard Car Seat Challenge results demonstrated 5 of 15 (33%) of infants with SVP with abnormal Obstructive Index by polysomnography would have passed a standard Car Seat Challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with SVP without clinical symptoms of SDB may be at high risk for SDB that appears worse in the car seat position. The standard Car Seat Challenge is not dependable in the identification of infants with SVP and SDB. Further studies are warranted to further delineate its potential impact of SDB on the clinical outcomes of infants with SVP.

Car Seat Tolerance Screening in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Failure Rates, Risk Factors, and Adverse Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the epidemiology of Car Seat Tolerance Screening (CSTS) failure and the association between test failure and all-cause 30-day postdischarge mortality or hospital readmission in a large, multicenter cohort of preterm infants receiving neonatal intensive care. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used the prospectively collected Optum Neonatal Database. Study infants were born at <37 weeks of gestation between 2010 and 2016. We identified independent predictors of CSTS failure and calculated the risk-adjusted odds of all-cause 30-day mortality or hospital readmission associated with test failure. RESULTS: Of 7899 infants cared for in 788 hospitals, 334 (4.2%) failed initial CSTS. Greater postmenstrual age at testing and African American race were independently associated with decreased failure risk. Any treatment with an antacid medication, concurrent use of caffeine or supplemental oxygen, and a history of failing a trial off respiratory support were associated with increased failure risk. The mean adjusted post-CSTS duration of hospitalization was 3.1 days longer (95% CI, 2.7-3.6) among the infants who failed the initial screening. Rates of 30-day all-cause mortality or readmission were higher among infants who failed the CSTS (2.4% vs 1.0%; P = .03); however, the difference was not significant after confounder adjustment (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.11-1.31). CONCLUSION: CSTS failure was associated with longer post-test hospitalization but no difference in the risk-adjusted odds for 30-day mortality or hospital readmission. Whether CSTS failure unnecessarily prolongs hospitalization or results in appropriate care that prevents adverse postdischarge outcomes is unknown. Further research is needed to address this knowledge gap.