Withdrawal syndrome after antipsychotics discontinuation: an analysis of the WHO database of spontaneous reports (Vigibase) between 2000 and 2022.

RATIONALE: Withdrawal syndrome (WDS) has been described after discontinuation of antipsychotics. WDS could be the consequence of an over-activation of the dopaminergic pathway. Antipsychotics with a higher affinity for dopamine D2 receptors could be associated with a higher risk of WDS. This study aims to address this statement and evaluate the risk difference for withdrawal syndrome between antipsychotics based on pharmacovigilance data. METHODS: We collected individual reports registered in Vigibase® between 01/01/2000 and 31/12/2022 of patients treated with antipsychotics and who had presented WDS. A disproportionality analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of reporting WDS with each antipsychotic compared to all other antipsychotics. We performed a correlation analysis to assess the correlation between the risk of reporting WDS for each antipsychotic in relation with their pKi for D2 and 5HT2A receptors. RESULTS: The most frequent psychiatric withdrawal symptoms after antipsychotic discontinuation were insomnia, anxiety and depression. Tremor, headache and dizziness were among the most frequently reported neurologic withdrawal symptoms. Tiotixene had the highest risk of reporting WDS (ROR 7.08; 95%CI 3.49 - 14.35) followed by pimozide (ROR 4.35; 95%CI 1.93 - 9.77), quetiapine (ROR 4.24; 95%CI 3.87 - 4.64), thioridazine (ROR 4.17; 95%CI 2.50-6.98) and ziprasidone (ROR 2.98; 95%CI 2.41-3.67). We found a poor correlation between D2/5HT2A binding affinity and the risk of reporting withdrawal syndrome (R2 = 0,094). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there might be a risk difference for WDS between antipsychotics. Tiotixene, pimozide and quetiapine were associated with a higher risk of reporting a WDS whereas this risk was lower with chlorpromazine, clozapine and fluphenazine. We could not address the issue of withdrawal psychosis, withdrawal dyskinesia, rebound psychosis or supersensitivity psychosis due to the lack of specific WHO medDRA coded terms to identify potential cases.

Drug-induced Sweet's syndrome: A case/non-case study in the French pharmacovigilance database.

AIMS: Sweet's syndrome is an acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis first described in 1964 by Robert Douglas Sweet. The pathophysiological mechanism is not fully established; however, several cases of Sweet's syndrome have been reported following drug administration. METHODS: To investigate the existence of pharmacovigilance signals between drugs and the occurrence of Sweet's syndrome, we performed a case/non-case study on reports of 'acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis' registered in the French pharmacovigilance database. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval were calculated. RESULTS: Amongthe 994 789 reports recorded in the database, 136 were Sweet's syndrome, of which 50.7% were men and the median age was 59 years (range 15-91). A total of 224 drugs were mentioned as suspects: 21.0% were antibacterials, 19.2% were antineoplastics and 12.1% were immunosuppressants. Median time to onset from drug initiation to the development of Sweet's syndrome was 15 days (range 1-1095). The highest RORs were observed with bortezomib (74.04 [40.8-134.2]), azacitidine (72.14 [29.4-176.9]), perfilgrastim (67.05 [21.2-211.6]), azathioprine (55.46 [34.8-88.4]) and bendamustine (35.84 [11.4-112.8]). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacovigilance signals have been observed between the occurrence of Sweet's syndrome and colony-stimulating factors, immunosuppressants, antineoplastics and antibiotics. Clinicians should be aware of the potential associations with these drugs and should be encouraged to report any case of drug-induced Sweet's syndrome.

Fluoropyrimidine usage in cases with hyperammonemia: real-world data study using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.

PURPOSE: Fluoropyrimidines are anticancer drugs and can cause hyperammonemia both intravenously and orally. Renal dysfunction may interact with fluoropyrimidine to cause hyperammonemia. We performed quantitative analyses of hyperammonemia using a spontaneous report database to examine the frequency of intravenously and orally administered fluoropyrimidine, the reported frequency of fluoropyrimidine-related regimens, and fluoropyrimidine's interactions with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This study used data collected between April 2004 and March 2020 from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) of hyperammonemia was calculated for each fluoropyrimidine drug and was adjusted for age and sex. Heatmaps depicting the use of anticancer agents in patients with hyperammonemia were drawn. The interactions between CKD and the fluoropyrimidines were also calculated. These analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Hyperammonemia was observed in 861 of the 641,736 adverse events reports. Fluorouracil was the most frequent drug associated with hyperammonemia (389 cases). The ROR of hyperammonemia was 32.5 (95% CI 28.3-37.2) for intravenously administered fluorouracil, 4.7 (95% CI 3.3-6.6) for orally administered capecitabine, 1.9 (95% CI 0.87-4.3) for tegafur/uracil, and 2.2 (95% CI 1.5-3.2) for orally administered tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil. Calcium levofolinate, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and irinotecan were the most frequently reported agents in cases of hyperammonemia with intravenously administered fluorouracil. The coefficient of the interaction term between CKD and fluoropyrimidines was 1.12 (95% CI 1.09-1.16). CONCLUSION: Hyperammonemia cases were more likely to be reported with intravenous fluorouracil than orally administered fluoropyrimidines. Fluoropyrimidines might interact with CKD in hyperammonemia cases.

Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and vaccination: A disproportionality analysis.

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an auto-immune neurological disorder characterized by the presence in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of antibodies against the GluN1 subunit of NMDA receptors in the brain. The etiology of the disease remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the possible existence of pharmacovigilance signals relating to a link between vaccination and the occurrence of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. We performed a case/non-case study using data from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) up to 31 December 2021. All individual case study reports (ICSRs) linked to a vaccine and coded with the MedDRA Lower Level Term (LLT) "anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis" were analysed. We calculated the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for each type of vaccine. A total of 29,758,737 ICSRs were registered in VigiBase, of which 70 were coded under the selected LLT, and 29/70 (41.4%) involved a vaccine. Of these cases, 53.8% involved children aged younger than 15 years. The median time to onset of anti-NMDAR encephalitis after vaccination was 4 days (range 0-730). The highest RORs were observed for the diphtheria/polio/tetanus/pertussis vaccine [54.72 (95% CI 26.2-114.3)], yellow fever vaccine [50.02 (95% CI 15.7-159)] and human papillomavirus vaccine [32.89 (15.8-68.7)]. All cases were coded as serious; 13 patients did not recover, or were left with permanent sequelae. Nine patients recovered without sequelae or are on the path to recovery, and one patient died. In summary, pharmacovigilance signals were observed for anti-NMDAR encephalitis and vaccination. Clinicians need to be aware of this potential risk, and encourage to report any case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurring after vaccination.

Pharmacovigilance of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in associations with drugs and medical conditions: a retrospective study of hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) is a common problem in clinical medication. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between clinical drug application and CADR occurrence as evidence for preventive strategies and rational clinical drug use. METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics of CADRs of 858 patients admitted to Shandong Provincial Third Hospital from March 2007 to December 2018. The most significant drugs concerning the common skin symptoms and their significance to CADR were investigated by case-non-case and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 266 drugs were involved in 858 cases of CADR. Among the ten most relevant medications, primarily antibiotics and herbal injections, and nutritional support drugs, potassium sodium dehydroandrographolide succinate injection, and cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium injection were found to be 2.1 and 1.45 times statistically more prone to CADRs than to other adverse drug reactions (ADRs), respectively. The main route of administration was intravenous (63.16%), with oral administration accounting for 25.19%. There were 747 cases of ADR, 71 of severe ADR, 2 of new and severe ADRs, and 38 cases of new ADR. Overall, 100 cases of CADR exhibited abnormal alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum creatinine levels. The predictive factors for severe CADR occurrence included allergy and smoking histories, cefoperazone sodium, sulbactam sodium injection, levofloxacin lactate and sodium chloride injection. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-induced CADR symptoms are commonly associated with other ARDs, predominantly rashes and pruritus, and are often accompanied by some medical conditions, especially liver and kidney damage. Detailed attention to a patient's primary diseases, allergy history, and drug safety profile could help prevent or reverse CADR in most patients.

Relationship between Bell's Palsy and Previous Statin Use: A Case/Non-Case Study.

We intended to determine the relationship between previous statin use and Bell's palsy in a large study population receiving statins for the past 2 years. The Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort data from 2002 to 2015 were collected. Participants with Bell's palsy (n = 3203) were matched with participants without Bell's palsy (n = 12,812). The number of days of previous statin use for 2 years before the onset of Bell's palsy was analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Subgroups of age, sex, obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, total cholesterol, and blood pressure were analyzed for any association between Bell's palsy and prior statin use. The Bell's palsy group reported greater statin use than the non-Bell's palsy group (84.6 (standard deviation, SD = 201.7) vs. 74.4(SD = 189.4), p = 0.009). Previous statin use was associated with Bell's palsy in the crude model (95% confidence intervals = 1.03-1.19, p = 0.006). However, this relationship disappeared when the possible covariates were adjusted for in model 2. All subgroups showed no increased odds for Bell's palsy in previous statin users. We did not find an association between Bell's palsy and previous statin use in this Korean population aged ≥40 years.

Antidepressants and movement disorders: a postmarketing study in the world pharmacovigilance database.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants-induced movement disorders are rare and imperfectly known adverse drug reactions. The risk may differ between different antidepressants and antidepressants' classes. The objective of this study was to assess the putative association of each antidepressant and antidepressants' classes with movement disorders. METHODS: Using VigiBase®, the WHO Pharmacovigilance database, disproportionality of movement disorders' reporting was assessed among adverse drug reactions related to any antidepressant, from January 1967 to February 2017, through a case/non-case design. The association between nine subtypes of movement disorders (akathisia, bruxism, dystonia, myoclonus, parkinsonism, restless legs syndrome, tardive dyskinesia, tics, tremor) and antidepressants was estimated through the calculation first of crude Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), then adjusted ROR on four potential confounding factors: age, sex, drugs described as able to induce movement disorders, and drugs used to treat movement disorders. RESULTS: Out of the 14,270,446 reports included in VigiBase®, 1,027,405 (7.2%) contained at least one antidepressant, among whom 29,253 (2.8%) reported movement disorders. The female/male sex ratio was 2.15 and the mean age 50.9 ± 18.0 years. We found a significant increased ROR for antidepressants in general for all subtypes of movement disorders, with the highest association with bruxism (ROR 10.37, 95% CI 9.62-11.17) and the lowest with tics (ROR 1.49, 95% CI 1.38-1.60). When comparing each of the classes of antidepressants with the others, a significant association was observed for all subtypes of movement disorders except restless legs syndrome with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) only. Among antidepressants, mirtazapine, vortioxetine, amoxapine, phenelzine, tryptophan and fluvoxamine were associated with the highest level to movement disorders and citalopram, paroxetine, duloxetine and mirtazapine were the most frequently associated with movement disorders. An association was also found with eight other antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: A potential harmful association was found between movement disorders and use of the antidepressants mirtazapine, vortioxetine, amoxapine, phenelzine, tryptophan, fluvoxamine, citalopram, paroxetine, duloxetine, bupropion, clomipramine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, mianserin, sertraline, venlafaxine and vilazodone. Clinicians should beware of these adverse effects and monitor early warning signs carefully. However, this observational study must be interpreted as an exploratory analysis, and these results should be refined by future epidemiological studies.

Benzodiazepine-Related Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Signal Detection Study Using a Case/Non-Case Approach.

OBJECTIVE: The association between benzodiazepine use and the risk of cognitive impairment or dementia has been controversial. Our study aims to detect this association through a case/non-case method using the Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management-Korea adverse event reporting system database (KIDS-KD) between 2007 and 2016. METHODS: Cases were adverse event (AE)-pairs with suspected cognitive impairment or dementia. 10 non-cases were matched to each case on age and sex. Exposure was defined as use of benzodiazepines, including long-, intermediate-, and short-acting benzodiazepine. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to estimate reporting odds ratios (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of the 1,086,584 AE-pairs, 887 cases were suspected AE-pairs of cognitive impairment or dementia, and 775,444 non-cases were selected. Benzodiazepine use was associated with increased AE-pairs of cognitive impairment or dementia when assessed using those with certain, probable, and/or possible in causality assessments (ROR=2.69, 95% CI=1.66-4.38). Higher ROR estimates were shown in female (2.33, 1.48-3.67) and in those with polypharmacy (2.20, 1.35-3.57). Dementia safety profiles were inconsistent across individual benzodiazepine components. CONCLUSION: These results suggest the potentially increased association between benzodiazepine use and cognitive impairment or dementia in female and those with polypharmacy. Inconsistent safety profiles of benzodiazepine components should be further investigated.

Bullous pemphigoid associated with the use of dipeptidil peptidase-4 inhibitors: analysis from studies based on pharmacovigilance databases.

Background Bullous pemphigoid has been associated to dipeptidase-4 inhibitors. Objectives Addressing the potential Bullous pemphigoid-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors association based on pharmacovigilance data currently available in Spain in order to obtain a composite disproportionality estimator from all the data generated by the case-non case studies conducted to this date. Setting The Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs database. Method Case-non case study based on the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs notifications submitted between 2007 and 2018 (n = 169,280), using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term (Preferred Term) 'pemphigoid' for sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin (n = 1952). As negative control, we used acetaminophen, while furosemide was the positive control. A pooled reported odds ratio analysis in the French, Japanese, and Spanish national pharmacovigilance databases was performed. On The Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs, we conducted a bullous pemphigoid-metformin association analysis within the period 1982-2018. Main outcome measure Adverse reaction cases in pharmacovigilance databases and the disproportionality through the reporting odds ratio. Results Within The Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Human Use Drugs, we found 45 cases of bullous pemphigoid in dipeptidase-4 inhibitors patients. Median age was 77 years (range 72-82). The median latency period was 7 months (range 0.23-86). The Bullous pemphigoid-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors association was established with a reporting odd ratio = 70.0 (95% confidence intervals 49.1-10.1). In the combined analysis of the three aforementioned pharmacovigilance databases, the pooled reporting odd ratio was 81.0 (95% confidence intervals 69.5-94.4). Conclusion The composite estimator for the three national pharmacovigilance databases yields clear evidence of a Bullous pemphigoid-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors association, which was statistically significant for both the pharmacological class as a whole and each of the dipeptidase-4 inhibitors agents under investigation. Metformin's role in the incidence of bullous pemphigoid appeared casual rather than causal. No differences between Caucasian and Asian populations were noted.

Drug-induced hearing loss: a case/non-case study in the French pharmacovigilance database.

Hearing loss is defined as a decrease in the ability to perceive sounds which can occur suddenly or gradually and affects one ear or both. It is related to various etiologies, in particular drugs. The identification of all drugs that could be associated with hearing loss is essential for the patients' life quality. The objective of our study was to identify signals of hearing loss involving drugs approved in the last 20 years. The occurrence in association with drugs known for their ototoxicity was also analyzed. We used a case/non-case method in the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD). The cases were reports of hearing loss in the FPVD between January 2007 and August 2017. Non-cases were all reports over the same period. We calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals. Among the 555 reports of hearing loss, significant RORs were found for 68 drugs. The main therapeutic classes implicated were antineoplastic agents (n = 240), systemic anti-infective agents (n = 182), immunosuppressants (n = 42) loop diuretics (n = 26), and salicylate analgesics (n = 26). We found signals of hearing loss with azacitidine, vaccines and nevirapine, immunosuppressants such as leflunomide, and biotherapies such as panitumumab and vandetanib. Prescribers should be informed about the potential associations with all these drugs. The role of the pathology itself and the known ototoxic drugs that can be associated do not allow to conclude definitively. Audiograms for the early detection of hearing loss induced by drugs known to be ototoxic are rarely carried out. Preventive treatments exist and must be considered.

Case-non-case studies: Principle, methods, bias and interpretation.

Case-non-case studies are among the methods used to assess drug safety by analyzing the disproportionality of adverse drug reaction reports in pharmacovigilance databases. First used in the 1980s, the last few decades have seen a significant increase in the use of this study design. The principle of case-non-case studies is to compare the drug exposure of cases of an adverse reaction of interest with that of cases with other reported reactions and called "non-cases". Their results are presented in the form of reporting odds ratio (ROR), the interpretation of which makes it possible to highlight pharmacovigilance signals. This article describes the principle of case-non-case studies, the calculation method of the ROR and its confidence interval, the different analytical modalities and how to interpret its results with regard to the advantages and limitations of this type of study.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions to psychotropic drugs and their risk factors - a case-control study.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) in patients with psychotropic drugs are common. Large studies on the relevant drugs and other risk factors are still scarce. 594 cases of severe CADRs ("cases") were compared with 8085 cases of other adverse drug reactions ("non-cases") documented in a pharmacovigilance program in psychiatry (AMSP) from 1993 to 2014. Logistic regression was carried out to determine risk factors and between-drug differences. CADRs were relatively more prevalent in patients treated with clomipramine, maprotiline, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, acamprosate, clomethiazole and disulfiram as well as with antidepressants and anticonvulsants as drug classes (p < 0.01). For these drugs, significantly more women were found in patients using maprotiline, lamotrigine (not carbamazepine) and in the groups of antidepressants, tricyclics and anticonvulsants (p < 0.01). Women were more vulnerable to CADRs (67% in cases and 56% in non-cases, p < 0.01). The significantly higher rate of CADRs in women was mainly observed under age of 50 years, i.e. during female reproductive years. In a multivariate logistic regression, female sex, the diagnostic group ICD F1 (substance abuse), maprotiline, carbamazepine, lamotrigine and clomethiazole were identified as risk factors of CADRs. The case/non-case approach allowed to identify risk factors based on empirical data rather than experts' evaluations. The new findings of substance abuse and clomethiazole as risk factors for CADRs have to be confirmed in further studies. Since CADRs can be life-threatening, it is important to be aware of risk factors, especially women during their reproductive period and with lamotrigine treatment.

[Case-non case studies: Principles, methods, bias and interpretation]. / Les études cas­non cas : principe, méthodes, biais et interprétations.

Case-non case studies belongs to the methods assessing drug safety by analyzing the disproportionality of notifications of adverse drug reactions in pharmacovigilance databases. Used for the first time in the 1980s, the last few decades have seen a significant increase in the use of this design. The principle of the case-non case study is to compare drug exposure in cases of a studied adverse reaction with that of cases of other reported adverse reactions and called "non cases". Results are presented in the form of a reporting odds ratio (ROR), the interpretation of which makes it possible to identify drug safety signals. This article describes the principle of the case-non case study, the method of calculating the ROR and its confidence interval, the different modalities of analysis and how to interpret its results with regard to the advantages and limitations of this design.

Association between the Current Situation of Adverse Reactions Caused by Non-prescription Drug Abuse and Patient Backgrounds / 医薬品情報学

Objective:In this study,we explored adverse reactions and patient background and performed a case/non-case study on a database of adverse reaction case reports in order aid the prevention of non-prescription drug abuse.Study Design:We conducted a case/non-case study on a database of adverse reaction case reports.Methods:We studied case reports of adverse reactions and addiction in Japan and extracted adverse reaction cases associated with taking antipyretic analgesics,antitussive drugs,antitussive expectorant drugs,hypnotic and sedative drugs,anti-anxiety drugs,and purgative drugs. We divided the extracted cases into an abuse case group (adverse reactions associated with non-prescription drug abuse,and divided its intended purpose or the purpose of abuse at the initial dose)and non-case group(other adverse reactions). We performed univariate logistic regression analysis on each item of investigation in the abuse case group and non-case group and calculated the odds ratio,p-value,and 95%confidence interval.Results:There were many abuse case reports of women 20-40 years old in the antipyretic analgesics abuse case group and many of them had liver/biliary lesions and chronic urological impairment. The most common reason reported for taking the initial dose of each drug was for its intended purpose.Discussion:It is important for pharmacists at community pharmacies and drugstores to be able to recognize the characteristics of patients who might be at risk of abuse and the adverse reactions and patient backgrounds elucidated in this study could be helpful in identifying them.

[Drugs and retinal disorders: A case/non-case study in the French pharmacovigilance database]. / Atteintes rétiniennes iatrogènes : étude cas/non cas dans la banque nationale de pharmacovigilance.

Retina is the part of the eye suffering most damage from pharmaceutical molecules. Drug-induced retinopathies have been described but data are scarce and sometimes conflicting especially concerning its potential seriousness. The aim of this study was to investigate potential associations between drugs and retinal disorders using the French Pharmacovigilance data. We used the case/non-case method in the French PharmacoVigilance Database (FPVD) to identify drugs able to induce retinopathies. Cases were reports of retinal disorders in the FPVD between January 2008 and December 2012. Non-cases were all other reports during the same period. To assess the association between retinopathy and drug intake, we calculated the odds-ratio (OR) [with their 95% confidence intervals] for all drugs associated with at least 3 cases of retinopathy. Among the 123 687 adverse drug reactions recorded during the studied period, we identified 164 cases of retinal disorders. Significant associations were found for 11 drugs. The main therapeutic classes were antirhumatismals (hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine and etanercept: 18 cases), anti-infective (ribavirine, PEG-interferon-alfa-2a and cefuroxime: 16 cases) and antineoplastic drugs (imatinib and letrozole: 8 cases. Three other drugs were also found: raloxifene (5 cases), erythropoietin beta (4 cases) and ranibizumab (3 cases). Taking into account the limits of the methodology, our study confirmed the association between retinopathy and some expected drugs such as aminoquinolines, interferons, imatinib or ranibizumab. Other drugs like erythropoietin beta, cefuroxime, letrozole and etanercept were significantly associated with retinal disorders although this was not or poorly described in the literature. Thus, further prospective studies are necessary to confirm such associations.

[Not Available]. / Démences médicamenteuses : étude cas/non-cas dans la Banque Nationale de Pharmacovigilance.

The increased incidence of dementia on the aging population makes this disease a major public health problem. Among known causes of dementia, drug etiology is under considered. We investigated the relationship between exposure to drug therapy and dementia with a case/non-case study using reports of the French Pharmacovigilance database. Among 263 962 adverse effects recorded between 1985 and 2005, 79 (0.03%) are dementia. Median age is 66 (range 3-91). There was 41 women and 37 men. The therapeutic drug class associated with dementia were anticonvulsants, antiparkinsonians, antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antipsychotics and morphinics. An association between reporting of dementia and non neurotropic drugs were also found, i.e. interferon alfa-2B, vancomycin and allopurinol. The term "Dementia" is only mentioned in the summary of the characteristics of valproate, but it may concern other drugs. Drug etiology for dementia is a reality but is not necessarily attributed as a cause in aging population, in particular.