Latin America at the margins? Implications of the geographic and epistemic narrowing of 'global' health.

To explore the narrowing of the concept of 'global' in global health, this article traces how Latin America has held a place of both privilege and power as well as marginalisation in the field. We employ a modified extended case method to examine how Latin America has been 'seen' and 'heard' in understandings of global health, underscoring the region's shifting role as a key site for research and practice in 'tropical medicine' from the mid-nineteenth century through World War II, to a major player and recipient of development assistance throughout the 'international health' era after World War II until the late twentieth century, to a region progressively marginalised within 'global health' since the mid-1980s/1990s. We argue that the progressive marginalisation of Latin America and Southern theory has not only hurt health equity and services, but also demonstrates the fundamental flaws in contemporary 'global' thinking. The narrowing of global health constitutes coloniality of power, with Northern institutions largely defining priority regions and epistemic approaches to health globally, thus impoverishing the field from the intellectual resources, political experience, and wisdom of Latin America's long traditions of social medicine and collective health.

The extended case method in nursing research: Unpacking the 'what', 'why' and 'how'.

BACKGROUND: The extended case method approach has been in existence for decades, albeit remains poorly utilized in nursing, though there are several phenomena of interest to the discipline that may potentially benefit from this unique approach. This provides an avenue to examine the extended case method approach and how to employ it to examine phenomena of interest to the discipline of nursing. OBJECTIVES: To examine what the extended case method is, why it should be employed to examine phenomena of interest to nursing, highlight some studies that have employed the approach in nursing, and offer methodological guidance to support its conduct and uptake in nursing research. DESIGN: Discussion paper. FINDINGS: The extended case method emphasizes the use of a theory and focuses on discovering how underlying structures at the micro level are affected by broader social forces. This makes it a useful approach to examine how macro level theories affect vulnerable, marginalized persons, which makes it particularly useful to the discipline of nursing. The approach is flexible, and there are no strict steps to be followed, albeit three important stages are highlighted. DISCUSSION: The extended case method offers a unique approach to examining how policies, rules and structures come into play in phenomena of interest to the discipline of nursing. This notwithstanding, the use of this approach is resource intensive. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: The extended case method is a unique qualitative design applicable to examining understudied, emerging and established phenomena relevant to nursing. The focus of the extended case method is to examine 'what is' and 'what ought to be'. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student's problem-solving ability.

The phenomenon of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 currently emphasizes rapid technological advances. There is a need for innovation in technology development to package the current learning process more effectively, one of which is the development of learning media which is an important part of the learning process and is certainly directed at meaningful learning that encourages students to develop 21st Century skills as an urgency in the field of education. This study aims to 1) Develop interactive learning media with an articulate storyline based on a case method on cellular respiration material. 2) Look at students' responses to the interactive learning media articulate storyline based on the case method on cellular respiration material in training students' problem-solving skills. This research is a Research and Development (R & D). The development model in this study uses the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model, this research was carried out until the Development stage. The instruments used in this study were an open questionnaire sheet, material aspect validation sheet, media aspect validation sheet and pedagogic aspect validation sheet. The analytical technique used is descriptive qualitative analysis technique and quantitative analysis by finding the average score obtained from the validator's assessment and looking at the criteria. The results of this study obtained a very valid interactive learning media with a score of 3.9 material expert validators in the very valid category, 3.69 media expert validators in the very valid category, pedagogical expert validators of 3.47 in the valid category. It can be concluded that the articulate storyline interactive learning media based on the case method developed can improve students' problem-solving abilities.

Top Chief: A Critical Assessment of a Cross-disciplinary Case Study as Common Intellectual Experience.

Common intellectual experiences (CIEs) are one of the lesser-known modalities that have been identified as a high impact practice (HIP) in higher education. This mixed-methods study assesses the outcomes of a short-term CIE, which took the form of a multi-disciplinary, multi-classroom case study focused on Danny Meyer, CEO of Union Square Hospitality group (the titular Top Chief), and his handling of the challenges faced by the hospitality industry under the conditions of the global pandemic. The findings suggest that such CIEs can be effective in fostering integrative thinking both within and across curricula, though the benefits may not accrue equally across all student populations. The study has implications for how universities develop and diversify their HIP portfolios, how faculty implement CIEs in their classrooms, and how students develop their capabilities as wicked problem solvers.

Educational video for training specialists in clinical laboratory diagnostics.

The adaptation of educational programs under restrictions during the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic and after it is based not only on the widespread use of video lectures, but also on the introduction of a number of new educational technologies. Hybrid learning will become the cornerstone of future educational technologies in clinical laboratory diagnostics and will contribute to the creation of virtual practical classes with examples of analysis of laboratory testing results based on case histories (Case Technologies). The key aspect in the implementation of video cases into the educational process is the development of video materials. The use of educational video cases developed by Vector-Best in the process of training specialists in clinical laboratory diagnostics during the cycles «Retraining¼ and «General Improvement¼ at the Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics of the Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky of the Ministry of Health of Russia was a convenient format and received positive assessment of cadets. Currently, the «IVD gallery¼ section has appeared on the FLM website and the placement of an additional educational resource - a library of educational video cases.

Analysis in the ethical decision-making of dental, nurse and physiotherapist students, through case-based learning.

INTRODUCTION: Training in ethical competencies is perceived with special interest among the objectives of health education. The dimensions of the person such as integrity, autonomy and dignity influence the choice of interventions, but the different specialties of the health sciences conceive these dimensions with different perspectives depending on the clinical setting. These divergences can be detected during the first years of undergraduate studies, and it is important to know the professional bias and its possible causes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A procedure was developed through case-based learning (CBL) to assess various characteristics of decision-making during the early stages of student training. A semi-quantitative method was designed based on the narrative responses of a case with ethical implications in the field of gender violence. The method was applied to 294 undergraduate students in nursing (95), physiotherapy (109) and dentistry (90) from the Faculty of Health Sciences of a Spanish university. A frequency analysis of the narrative responses of the students to the proposed case was carried out, using the chi-square test to determine any association between the variables studied: gender, specialty and ethical knowledge. RESULTS: Four types of response categories were detected, as a result of combining the personal conversation, report to legal authority or require assistance of other teams. The most common option in dentists is conversation only, while physical therapists include the assistance of other teams. In nursing, a balance is observed between both possibilities. The results show that student responses differ significantly among specialties and also differ significantly according to test scores on ethical knowledge. However, no significant differences were found between the responses provided by men and women. CONCLUSION: Most of the health sciences students highly valued their own capacity for dialogue and reflection to approach situations with complex ethical dimensions. We consider that case-based learning (CBL), in combination with narrative analysis is a valid means of evaluating the professional ethical competencies of students in health sciences careers applied to a common goal.

Efecto del método del caso en el conocimiento sobre vacunación en estudiantes de Enfermería / Impact of Case Method on vaccination knowledge among Nursing students

Objetivo: analizar las diferencias en la adquisición de conocimiento declarativo y argumentativo sobre la vacunación mediante dos metodologías educativas (método del caso (MdC) y clase expositiva (CE)) en estudiantes de segundo curso del Grado en Enfermería de la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.Métodos: estudio post-intervención con grupo control no equivalente realizado en el curso 2019/20. Se incluyó a todos los estudiantes (n= 29) matriculados en la asignatura “Enfermería del Ciclo Vital I” de segundo curso. El grupo experimental (GE: MdC) lo formaron quienes eligieron evaluación continuada y el grupo control (GC: CE) quienes eligieron evaluación final. Ambos recibieron 12 horas de formación semipresencial impartidas por la misma docente. Se analizaron: sexo, edad, tipo de formación y resultados en conocimiento declarativo y argumentativo obtenidos en el examen final de la asignatura. Se realizaron índices de estadística descriptiva y análisis bivariantes.Resultados: participaron 29 estudiantes (GE n= 23; GC n= 6). De forma global se obtuvo una mediana (Me) de 8 sobre 17 puntos. En conocimiento declarativo (sobre 10 puntos) los resultados fueron: GE [Me= 6; RIQ (4-8)]; GC [Me= 1; RIQ (0-2,75)]; p= 0,003. En conocimiento argumentativo (sobre 7 puntos) los resultados fueron: GE [Me= 2; RIQ(1-4)]; GC [Me= 1; RIQ (0,75-1,25)]; p= 0,012.Conclusiones: el método del caso es una herramienta más efectiva frente al modelo expositivo para que los futuros enfermeros memoricen información y argumenten las dudas que plantean los usuarios sobre la vacunación. Los resultados indican que hay margen de mejora en ambos grupos.(AU)

Objective: to analyze the differences in acquiring declarative and argumentative knowledge about vaccination through two educational methodologies: Case Method (CM) and Lecture Class (LC) in 2nd year students of the Nursing Degree at the Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.Method: a post-intervention study with a non-equivalent control arm, conducted in the 2019/20 year. The study included all students (n= 29) enrolled in the Nursing Care in the Life Cycle I subject in their second year. The experimental arm (EA: CM) was formed by those who chose continuous evaluation, and the control arm (CA: LC) by those who chose final evaluation. Both arms received a 12-hour blended training course by the same teacher. There was analysis of: gender, age, type of training, and results in declarative and argumentative knowledge obtained at the final exam of the subjects. Descriptive statistics indexes and bivariate analyses were conducted.Results: the study included 29 students (EA n= 23; CA n= 6). Overall, the median (Me) score achieved was 8 out of 17. In declarative knowledge (from 1 to 10), the results were: EA [Me= 6; IQR (4-8)]; CA [Me= 1; IQR (0-2.75)]; p= 0.003. In argumentative knowledge (from 1 to 7), the results were: EA [Me= 2; IQR (1-4)]; CA [Me= 1; IQR (0.75-1.25)]; p= 0.012.Conclusions: case Method is a more effective tool vs. the lecture model, for future nurses to memorize information and argue about any doubts asked by users about vaccination. Results have shown that there is room for improvement in both arms.(AU)

[Applying active learning in pharmaceutical studies by the way of team-based learning]. / Mobilisation des pédagogies actives dans les études pharmaceutiques à travers les travaux de groupes.

Currently, the most used pedagogical approach in pharmaceutical studies is transmissive teaching, in which students usually adopt a passive attitude. The aim of this article is to present the main characteristics of active learning, and to point how it can be integrated in pharmaceutical studies by the way of team-based learning. According to its different characteristics, team-based learning is an authentic method of active learning. This pedagogical method includes a preparation time, usually individually performed, and followed by the group work itself, in which the case method is the most frequently used. Team-based learning also allows students to work in interdisciplinarity and facilitates interactions between peers. The wide majority of the studies demonstrate that students acclaim this pedagogical approach as compared to more conventional teaching methods, and that their satisfaction increases their commitment in the tasks proposed in the course. Even though the results of studies concerning the impact of team-based learning on student retention and scores in tests are somewhat discordant, this pedagogical approach allows the acquisition or the reinforcement of skills that will be useful to students in their future professional life, like collaborative work and confidence in their ability to complete a task.

Taking CBL to the Lecture Hall: a Comparison of Outcomes Between Traditional Small Group CBL and a Novel Large Group Team-Based CBL Teaching Method.

PURPOSE: Case-based learning (CBL), an important component of medical school curricula, is an effective inquiry-based teaching method associated with high levels of student and teacher satisfaction. However, because traditional CBL requires small groups, its feasibility is limited by faculty and resources. We developed and tested a novel team-based CBL (TB-CBL) method to be implemented in the lecture hall. METHODS: All second-year students at our institution (n = 121) were randomized to either traditional small group CBL or TB-CBL during the Endocrine block and to the other modality during the Renal block. All students were exposed to both methods. Case content was identical, and sessions were run concurrently. This cross-over, non-inferiority study tested the hypothesis that no difference in knowledge acquisition, clinical reasoning, or student satisfaction would be detected between groups. RESULTS: Based on student performance on case-relevant exam questions, no difference in knowledge acquisition was seen between groups for either block (p = 0.62 Endocrine, p = 0.38 Renal). There was also no difference in overall final exam performance between groups (p = 0.56 Endocrine, p = 0.26 Renal). Case-relevant script concordance testing revealed no difference in clinical reasoning skills between groups (p = 0.87 Endocrine, p = 0.17 Renal). Satisfaction was higher for the TB-CBL format (p = 0.005). Cost analysis revealed that each small group CBL session costs $2654, while each TB-CBL session costs approximately $221. CONCLUSIONS: TB-CBL, a novel case-based teaching method, appears to produce similar learner outcomes and higher student satisfaction when compared with small group CBL. TB-CBL may be used to supplement case-based curricula while optimizing resource allocation.

Legal basis of professionals' competence formation of emergency and medical specialists in the first aid approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Introduction: The purpose of educational process in higher educational establishments is to train specialist who has fully mastered the professional competencies for performing daily activities and for action in non-standard situations, which can occur during fulfilling obligations. The aim: Compare the formation of professional competence and practical skills as important part of increasing effectiveness of specialists training; check the correspondence with current legal acts, which regulate the first aid training. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: The bibliography method, info-analytic method, the comparative method, and logical method were used in our research. CONCLUSION: Conclusion: Improvement of complex first aid curriculum for professionals of emergency service is determined the increasing of the level of psychological readiness for performing professional duties.

Self-management after hospitalisation.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to explore the processes used by older individuals to self-manage their health during the first 30 days after being discharged from the hospital. The underlying philosophy for this research was symbolic interactionism. From this perspective, individuals make meaning out of their experiences and act on the basis of those meanings. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the processes older adults use to adjust to and self-manage their evolved health status after returning home from the hospital. Few studies have explored this period from the perspective of the older individual living in the situation. METHODS: We used case study method to develop a collective, instrumental case to explain the phenomena of older individuals self-managing their health after hospitalisation. Data included interviews, participant diaries and researcher field notes. RESULTS: The sample included three women who were at least 75 years old, had been hospitalised for at least 24 hr and had been discharged within the week prior to the first interview. Data from the participants were used to create a composite case, Mrs. C. She managed her autonomy, activity, attitude, health and relationships across three phases of posthospitalisation, returning home, adjusting and the evolved normal. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into the experience of older individuals during the first 30 days after a stay in a healthcare facility and supports previous research findings regarding hospitalisation and self-management of chronic health problems. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings provide evidence that returning home is a process that usually takes about a month to get into a new routine. Nurses can use this case study to describe some people's experience after discharge, and to help the older individual to identify friends and family who can provide physical and emotional support during the time immediately after discharge.

Using the case method to explore characteristics of the clinical reasoning process among ambulance nurse students and professionals.

Clinical reasoning is proposed to represent cognitive processes, skills and decision-making aspects of nursing practice and is important for quality care. It has been suggested that the reasoning processes should be practiced during education to develop decision-making competence among nurses. The aim of the study was to explore and describe clinical reasoning processes at different times during specialist ambulance nurse education and among specialist ambulance nurses. Nurses were invited to participate: at initiation of specialist education (n = 19) and during the final weeks of specialist education (n = 17). We also invited nurses employed in ambulance service (n = 13). At each session a written case was presented for small group discussions. Discussions were recorded and transcribed. A mapping sentence was used to analyse the meaning units of the text capturing different elements of clinical reasoning. For interpretation of data the results were then plotted in a three-dimensional diagram. Professional experiences and reflectivity seemed to influence both the content and the process of clinical reasoning. At initiation of specialist education, more analytical reasoning was used, while the specialist nurses mainly used a non-analytical approach. Specialist nurses incorporated a larger variety of content during their reasoning. Based on the findings here, the case-method might be useful for practicing various clinical reasoning skills and elaborating on decision-making processes.

Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners' continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of continuing medical education (CME) about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for general practitioners (GPs) by comparing two commonly used CME methods with each other and no CME (reference group). DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with primary healthcare centres (PHCCs) as units of randomisation. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: 24 PHCCs in Stockholm County, Sweden, were randomised into two CME intervention arms: case method learning (CM) (n=12) and traditional lectures (TL) (n=12). A reference group without CME (n=11) was recruited separately. GPs (n=255) participated in the study arm to which their PHCC was allocated: CM, n=87; TL, n=93; and reference, n=75. Two 2-hour CME seminars were given in a period of 3 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in scores between baseline and 12 months on a 13-item questionnaire about evidence-based COPD management (0-2 points/question, maximum total score 26 points). RESULTS: 133 (52%) GPs completed the questionnaire both at baseline and 12 months. Both CM and TL resulted in small yet significantly higher total scores at 12 months than at baseline (CM, 10.34 vs 11.44; TL, 10.21 vs 10.91; p<0.05); there were few significant differences between these CME methods. At both baseline and 12 months, all three groups' scores were generally high on questions about smoking cessation support and low on those that measured spirometry interpretation skills, interprofessional care and management of multimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Neither short CM nor short TL CME sessions substantially improve GPs' skills in managing COPD. It is justified to challenge the use of these common CME methods as a strategy for improving GPs' level of knowledge about management of COPD and other complex chronic diseases characterised by multimorbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02213809; Results.

COPD management by Swedish general practitioners - baseline results of the PRIMAIR study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of suffering and death. Evidence-based management of COPD by general practitioners (GPs) is crucial for decreasing the impact of the disease. Efficient strategies include early diagnosis, smoking cessation and multimodal treatment. AIM: To describe knowledge about and skills for managing COPD in GPs in Sweden. METHODS: Prior to COPD education (the PRIMAIR Study), GPs at primary health care centers (PHCCs) in Stockholm replied to 13 written, patient-case based, multiple choice and free-text questions about COPD. Their knowledge and practical management skills were assessed by assigned points that were analyzed with non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Overall, 250 GPs at 34 PHCCs replied (89% response rate). Total mean score was 9.9 (maximum 26). Scores were highest on 'management of smoking cessation', 'follow-up after exacerbation' and 'diagnostic procedures'. Spirometry was used frequently, although interpretation skills were suboptimal. 'Management of maintenance therapy', 'management of multimorbidity' and 'interprofessional cooperation' had mediocre scores. Scores were unrelated to whether there was a nurse-led asthma/COPD clinic at the PHCC. CONCLUSIONS: Swedish GPs' knowledge of COPD and adherence to current guidelines seem insufficient. A nurse-led asthma/COPD clinic at the PHCC does not correlate with sufficient COPD skills in the GPs. The relevance of this study to participants' actual clinical practice and usefulness of easy-to-access clinical guides are interesting topics for future investigation. To identify problem areas, we suggest using questionnaires prior to educational interventions. Key Points General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in providing evidence-based care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are treated in primary care. Swedish GPs' knowledge about COPD and adherence to current guidelines seem insufficient. Areas in greatest need of improvement are spirometry interpretation, management of maintenance therapy, management of multimorbidity in patients with COPD and interprofessional cooperation.

Medication Reconciliation in the Hospital: An Interactive Case-Based Session for Internal Medicine Residents.

Introduction: Medication reconciliation is a complex process of creating and maintaining the most accurate medication list for a patient to help guide therapy. Done incorrectly, the process of medication reconciliation can lead to medical error and result in adverse events for patients. Medication reconciliation on inpatient medicine service is often done by internal medicine residents. However, published reports of educational interventions for residents are limited. Methods: We created a 1-hour session that was experiential, case based, and targeted to the level of a first-year resident. In total, 31 internal medicine residents completed the curriculum, which involved either a 1-hour classroom group activity or an individual virtual activity. The curriculum was evaluated using standard forms with qualitative feedback regarding learner satisfaction, pre- and postsession confidence survey, and pre- and postsession patient chart audits. Results: Qualitative feedback demonstrated residents' positive experiences. There was no significant change in residents' confidence in portions of the medication reconciliation process. One month following the educational intervention, 100% of inpatient charts audited for review of the medication list were accurate, as compared to 67%-83% accuracy prior to the session. Discussion: This novel case-based medication reconciliation teaching session, targeted at learners in an internal medicine residency, can easily be implemented at other institutions using the institution-specific electronic health record. The session was well received by residents, and we observed improved accuracy in the medication reconciliation process done by residents.

Factors predicting training transfer in health professionals participating in quality improvement educational interventions.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of quality improvement (QI) training transfer are needed. This study aimed to identify these predictors among health professionals who participated in a QI training program held at a large hospital in the United States between 2005 and 2014. It also aimed to determine how these predictive factors facilitated or impeded QI training transfer. METHODS: Following the Success Case Method, we used a screening survey to identify trainees with high and low levels of training transfer. We then conducted semistructured interviews with a sample of the survey respondents to document how training transfer was achieved and how lack of training transfer could be explained. The survey's response rate was 43%, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.89. We then conducted a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts of 16 physicians. RESULTS: The analysis revealed 3 categories of factors influencing the transfer of QI training: trainee characteristics, training course, and work environment. Relevant trainee characteristics included attitude toward change, motivation, mental processing skills, interpersonal skills, and the personality characteristics curiosity, humility, conscientiousness, resilience, wisdom, and positivity. The training project, team-based learning, and lectures were identified as relevant aspects of the training course. Work culture, work relationships, and resources were subthemes of the work environment category. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several QI training transfer predictors in our cohort of physicians. We hypothesize that some of these predictors may be more relevant to QI training transfer. Our results will help organizational leaders select trainees who are most likely to transfer QI training and to ensure that their work environments are conducive to QI training transfer.

Patient Perspectives on Gender Identity Data Collection in Electronic Health Records: An Analysis of Disclosure, Privacy, and Access to Care.

Purpose: In 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ruled that health organizations comply with additional requirements for electronic health records (EHRs), known as "Meaningful Use," and develop the capacity to collect gender identity data. Research has established effectiveness of a two-step gender identity question to collect these data. This study examines transgender patient perspectives on the use of a two-step question and experiences with privacy and sensitive disclosures in EHRs and healthcare settings. Methods: Four focus groups (N=30) were conducted in Chicago, Illinois in 2014-2015. Participants were asked to compare two intake forms-one with a two-step question and one with a single question-and discuss experiences with gender identity disclosure, privacy, and access to care. Narratives were transcribed verbatim to identify patterns and themes; the extended case method was used and grounded the data analysis process in the concept of intersectionality. Results: Participants expressed appreciation for improved reliability and competencies that the two-part question may afford. Narratives reveal concerns related to patient privacy, safety, and access because of the contexts in which these data are collected and transmitted. Virtually all participants described situations whereby sensitive gender identity information had been involuntarily disclosed, misinterpreted, or abused, and safety and care were compromised. Conclusion: Participants recognized the potential of the two-part question as a measurement and competency tool, but anticipated new privacy violations and involuntary disclosures. Narratives indicate that effects of sensitive disclosures may vary intersectionally, whereby white participants experienced lesser harms than their immigrant, HIV-positive, and black trans feminine counterparts. Discrimination and privacy violations may occur regardless of a two-part or one-part gender identity question, but increasing these sensitive disclosures within expanding EHR infrastructures may require a range of mechanisms that have flexibility across contexts to safeguard sensitive information and access to care.

The implementation and reflection of the application of cross-disciplinary joint teaching model on medical humanity courses / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Objective To explore the difference between the results of the cross-disciplinary joint teaching method and the traditional teaching method in medical humanity courses.Method 128 students in one military medical university were selected to be randomly assigned to the study group and the control group,using the cross-disciplinary joint teaching mode (study group,n=64) and traditional teaching mode (control group,n=64) in medical humanity courses.For the joint teaching mode,we compiled the teaching materials of medical humanities,formed the teaching team and organized the academic communication after class by social media.After all courses were finished,the subject cognition and approval of whole students were evaluated by the unified arranged examination and questionnaire.Then the data was processed by SPSS 18.0.Results On the aspect of subject cognition,the total scores of the study group were higher than control group in health law [(76.2 ± 3.34) vs.(72.5 ± 4.76);t=3.32,P=0.000] and medical ethics [(75.3 ±2.93) vs.(68.3 ± 3.10);t=4.01,P=0.000].On the aspect of subject approval,the recognition of the students of the study group in these three subjects were more than those of the control group except the selfevaluation of medical psychology (P=0.000).Conclusion The application of cross-disciplinary joint teaching method on medical humanity courses contributes evidently to the promotion of the medical humanity quality of clinical medical students.To implement this model,however,multi-sided resources are needed for colleges to coor-dinate,for perfect results require more practical exploration.

The Effects of Clinical Education Program for Nurses in Regional Public Hospital / 보건행정학회지

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of clinical education program for nurses in regional public hospital, utilizing the Kirkpatrick's model. METHODS: Kirkpatrik's 4-level model was applied to this study. Trainees were asked to fill out questionnaires in the middle and at the end of the program. Also administrators of excellent trainees were asked to fill out the questionnaires regarding nursing management performance after 1-2 months from the end of the training course. RESULTS: All trainees had positive reactions to the clinical education program. Not only the results of individual level (satisfaction and achievement scores, academic achievement scores, practical application rate, and educational transition factors) but also the scores of organization level (nursing management performance scores) are improved. CONCLUSION: By showing a correlation between the effectiveness factors we need to verify the relationship between these factors in a future study. In addition, development of quantitative and qualitative performance indicators are needed. To establish a long-term education system, it is required to applying the excellent trainee's successful experiences.

Training and capacity building evaluation: Maximizing resources and results with Success Case Method.

This article describes the use of Success Case Method (Brinkerhoff, 2003) to evaluate health promotion and public health training programs. The goal of the Office Community Research and Engagement (OCRE) of the Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium (PRCTRC) is to establish a stable and sustainable translational research capacity. Early efforts toward achieving this goal included sponsoring two independent research training programs. A description of the implementation of the five step Success Case Method is presented. Results reveal that SCM would deem both trainings as highly successful, based upon the overall impact of a low number of success cases. However, a traditional summative evaluation would consider this disappointing. Strengths of SCM are discussed. It was concluded that the Success Case Method is a useful and valuable evaluative method for measuring the success of health promotion and public health training initiatives and provides sufficient information for decision-making processes.