Effectiveness and Safety of Different Treatment Modalities for Patients Older Than 60 Years with Distal Radius Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and complications of different treatment modalities for elderly patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Eight databases were searched. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies were RCTs that compared different treatment modalities (surgical or nonoperative) in patients older than 60 years with displaced or unstable intra-articular and/or extra-articular DRFs. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs met the eligibility criteria (2020 patients). For indirect comparisons, the main findings of the NMA were in volar locking plate (VLP) versus cast immobilization, with the mean differences for the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at -4.45 points (p < 0.05) and grip strength at 6.11% (p < 0.05). Additionally, VLP showed a lower risk ratio (RR) of minor complications than dorsal plate fixation (RR: 0.02) and bridging external fixation (RR: 0.25). Conversely, VLP and dorsal plate fixation showed higher rates of major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other treatment modalities, VLP showed statistically significant differences for some functional outcomes; however, most differences were not clinically relevant. For complications, although most differences were not statistically significant, VLP was the treatment modality that reported the lowest rate of minor and overall complications but also showed one of the highest rates of major complications in these patients. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022315562.

Usefulness of digital measurements for functional evaluation of paediatric elbow range of motion.

BACKGROUND: Elbow immobilization due to fractures of the upper limb is frequent in paediatric patients. Proper follow-up is critical to assess elbow functional recovery. Telemedicine can be an option for remote monitoring of these patients. The purpose of this study was to compare personal and virtual evaluation of elbow range of motion after long arm cast withdrawal in paediatric patients. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was carried out which included all paediatric patients with elbow immobilization in long arm casts treated at our centre. After cast withdrawal, elbow range of motion was evaluated by telemedicine and in office consultation in all four movements (flexion, extension, pronation and supination). RESULTS: Ninety-three patients met the selection criteria. Median age at time of immobilization was 8 years. Mean elbow immobilization time was 23 days (range 18-56 days). When comparing office and remote measurements, no statistical differences were found for any of the four elbow movements measured in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Remote evaluation of elbow range of motion by telemedicine is technically feasible. We evaluated elbow range of motion in paediatric patients after immobilization and we did not find differences between digital and in office measurements. The results were similar to those obtained through assessment in the office. We believe that this is a useful tool to facilitate remote patient follow-up.

Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute treatment for distal radius fractures, the most frequent fractures in the pediatric population, represents a challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Deciding on surgical restoration of the alignment or cast immobilization without reducing the fracture is a complex concern given the remodeling potential of bones in children. In addition, the lack of evidence-based safe boundaries of shortening and angulation, that will not jeopardize upper-extremity functionality in the future, further complicates this decision. OBJECTIVE: The authors aim to measure functional outcomes, assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Physical Function v2.0 instrument. The authors hypothesize that outcomes will not be worse in children treated with cast immobilization in situ compared with those treated with closed reduction with or without percutaneous fixation. The authors also aim to compare the following as secondary outcomes: ulnar variance and fracture alignment in the sagittal and coronal planes, range of motion, pressure ulcers, pain control, radius osteotomy due to deformity, pseudoarthrosis cure, and remanipulation. METHODS: This is the protocol of a randomized noninferiority trial comparing upper-extremity functionality in children aged 5 to 10 years, after sustaining a distal radius fracture, treated with either cast immobilization in situ or closed reduction with or without fixation in a single orthopedic hospital. Functional follow-up is projected at 6 months, while clinical and radiographic follow-up will occur at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months. RESULTS: Recruitment commenced in July 2021. As of January 2022, 23 children have been randomized. Authors expect an average of 5 patients to be recruited monthly; therefore, recruitment and analysis should be complete by October 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This experimental design that addresses upper-extremity functionality after cast immobilization in situ in children who have sustained a distal fracture of the radius may yield compelling information that could aid the clinician in deciding on the most suitable orthopedic treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05008029; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05008029. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/34576.

Skeletal Muscle Anti-Atrophic Effects of Leucine Involve Myostatin Inhibition.

Lack of mechanical load leads to skeletal muscle atrophy, and one major underlying mechanism involves the myostatin pathway that negatively regulates protein synthesis and also activates Atrogin-1/MAFbx and MuRF1 genes. In hindlimb immobilization, leucine was observed to attenuate the upregulation of the referred atrogenes, thereby shortening the impact on fiber cross-sectional area, nonetheless, the possible connection with myostatin is still elusive. This study sought to verify the impact of leucine supplementation on myostatin expression. Male Wistar rats were supplemented with leucine and hindlimb immobilized for 3 and 7 days, after which soleus muscles were removed for morphometric measurements and analyzed for gene and protein expression by real-time PCR and Western blotting, respectively. Muscle wasting was prominent 7 days after immobilization, as expected, leucine feeding mitigated this effect. Atrogin-1/MAFbx gene expression was upregulated only after 3 days of immobilization, and this effect was attenuated by leucine supplementation. Atrogin-1/MAFbx protein levels were elevated after 7 days of immobilization, which leucine supplementation was not able to lessen. On the other hand, myostatin gene expression was upregulated in immobilization for 3 and 7 days, which returned to normal levels after leucine supplementation. Myostatin protein levels followed gene expression at a 3-day time point only. Follistatin gene expression was upregulated during immobilization and accentuated by leucine after 3 days of supplementation. Concerning protein expression, follistatin was not altered neither by immobilization nor in immobilized animals treated with leucine. In conclusion, leucine protects against skeletal muscle mass loss during disuse, and the underlying molecular mechanisms appear to involve myostatin inhibition and Atrogin-1 normalization independently of follistatin signaling.

U.S. State Driving Regulations Relevant to Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

The effect of lower extremity pathology and surgery on automobile driving has been a topic of contemporary interest, because these conditions can be associated with impaired driving function. We reviewed the U.S. driving laws relative to foot and ankle patients, for the 50 U.S. states (and District of Columbia). We aimed to address the following questions relative to noncommercial driving regulations: does the state have regulations with respect to driving in a lower extremity cast, driving with a foot/ankle immobilization device, driving with acute or chronic lower extremity pathology or disability, those who have undergone foot and/or ankle surgery, and those with diabetes? Full state-specific answers to the preceding questions are provided. Most states had no explicit or specific regulations with respect to driving in a lower extremity cast, a lower extremity immobilization device, or after foot and/or ankle surgery. Most states asked about diabetes during licensing application and renewal, and some asked specifically about lower extremity neuropathy and amputation. Most did not require physicians to report their patients with potentially impaired driving function (Pennsylvania and Oregon excepted) but had processes in place to allow them to do so at their discretion. Most states have granted civil and/or criminal immunity to physicians with respect to reporting (or lack of reporting) of potentially impaired drivers. It is our hope that this information will be useful in the development of future investigations focusing on driving safety in patients with lower extremity dysfunction.