Adequacy of the Dosing and Infusion Time of Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A PK/PD Simulation Study.

Introduction: Recent studies suggested the potential benefits of extended infusion times to optimize the treatment efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam, which indicated that the current pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target may not be sufficient, especially for severe infections. The purpose of this study is to assess the adequacy of dosing strategies and infusion durations of ceftazidime/avibactam when applying higher PK/PD targets. Methods: This study utilized published PK parameters to conduct Monte Carlo simulations. Different dosages including the recommended regimen based on renal function were simulated and evaluated by the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR). Different PK/PD targets were set for ceftazidime and avibactam. MIC distributions from various sources were used to calculate the CFR. Results: Multiple PK/PD targets have been set in this study, All recommended dosage could easily achieve the target of 50%fT ≥ MIC (ceftazidime) and 50%fT ≥ CT=1.0 mg/L (avibactam). However, for severe infection patients with normal renal function and augmented renal clearance at the recommended dosage (2000 mg/500 mg, every 8 hours), the infusion duration needs to be extended to 3 hours and 4 hours to achieve the targets of 100%fT ≥ MIC and 100%fT ≥ CT=1.0 mg/L. Only continuous infusion at higher dosages achieved 100%fT ≥ 4×MIC and 100%fT ≥ CT=4.0 mg/L targets to all currently recommended regimens. According to the varying MIC distributions, higher concentrations are needed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with the attainment rates vary across different regions. Conclusion: The current recommended dosing regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam is insufficient for severe infection patients, and continuous infusion is suggested.

A large-scale surveillance revealed that KPC variants mediated ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in clinically isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae.

To monitor the resistance rate and gain a deeper understanding of the resistance mechanisms, we conducted over a 2-year surveillance focusing on the Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with the clinical usage of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in a teaching hospital. A total of 4,641 K. pneumoniae isolates were screened to identify the CZA resistance through antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Comprehensive analyses, including homology analysis, conjugation experiments, clone assays, and whole genome sequencing, were furtherly performed on the CZA-resistant strains. In total, four CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae (CZA-R-Kp) strains were separated from four patients, in which three of them received CZA treatment during the hospitalization, accounting for a 4% (3/75) resistance development rate of K. pneumoniae under CZA stress. All CZA-R-Kp isolates were found to possess variants of blaKPC-2. The identified mutations included blaKPC-33, blaKPC-86, and a novel variant designated as blaKPC-129, all of which were located in the Ω loop of the KPC enzyme. These mutations were found to impact the amino acid sequence and spatial structure of the enzyme's active center, consequently affecting KPC carbapenemase activity. This study underscores the importance of active surveillance to monitor the emergence of resistance to CZA, highlighting the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies for combating antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is crucial in maintaining the efficacy of CZA, a vital tool in the battle against multidrug-resistant infections.IMPORTANCEAs an effective drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) began to develop resistance in recent years and showed an increasing trend. In order to effectively monitor the resistance rate of CZA and understand its resistance mechanism, we monitored K. pneumoniae for more than 2 years to find CZA-resistant strains. Through comprehensive analysis of the selected CZA-resistant strains, it was found that all the CZA-resistant strains had mutation, which could affect the activity of KPC carbapenemase. This study highlights the importance of proactive surveillance to monitor the emergence of CZA resistance, which highlights the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is critical to maintaining the effectiveness of CZA, an important tool in the fight against multidrug-resistant infections.

Double blaKPC-2 copies quadrupled minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime-avibactam in hospital-derived Klebsiella pneumoniae.

To illustrate the genomic and drug resistance traits of the Klebsiella pneumoniae Kpn_XM9, which harbors a transposon (Tn) As1 and was barely susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). Whole-genome sequencing, gene deletion, antimicrobial susceptibility, and conjugation tests were carried out to illustrate the traits of Kpn_XM9. As confirmed by whole-genome sequencing, the Kpn_XM9 harbored a 5,523,536 bp chromosome and five plasmids with lengths being 128,129, 196,512, 84,812, 43,695, and 5,596 bp, respectively. Plasmid p1_Kpn_XM9 (128,219 bp) contained four resistance genes, blaCTX-M-65, blaTEM-1B, rmtB, and two copies of blaKPC-2. Genes blaKPC-2 were bracketed by ISKpn17 and ISKpn16 within a new composite Tn3-like TnAs1. The two tandem repeats, positioned opposite each other, were spaced 93,447 bp apart in p1_Kpn_XM9. Kpn_XM9 belonged to K64 and sequence type (ST) 11. The Kpn_XM9 was resistant to amikacin, aztreonam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, doxycycline, minocycline, tigecycline, colistin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; it was barely susceptible to CZA with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 8/4 µg/mL, which declined to 2/4 µg/mL after a 18,555 bp nucleotide was knocked out and one copy of blaKPC-2 was sustained on p1_Kpn_XM9. Kpn_XM9 had virulence genes encoding Types 1 and 3 fimbriae, four siderophores, and capsular polysaccharide anchoring protein but no genes upregulating capsular polysaccharide synthesis. The Kpn_XM9 presented a classical phenotype with extreme drug resistance. The emergence of double copies of blaKPC-2 in a single plasmid from the predominant ST11 K. pneumoniae represents a new therapeutic challenge.IMPORTANCEWith the wide use of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant organisms, its resistance is increasingly documented; among the corresponding resistance mechanisms, mutations of blaKPC-2 or blaKPC-3 into other subtypes are dominant to date. However, more copies of blaKPC-2 may also greatly increase the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime-avibactam, which could be conferred by transposon As1 and insertion sequence 26 and should be of concern.

Evolution of blaKPC Under the Pressure of Carbapenems and Ceftazidime/Avibactam in a Patient With Persistent Bacteremia Caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae.

A 30-year-old Korean man with myelodysplastic syndrome admitted hospital due to undifferentiated fever and recurrent skin lesions. He received combination therapy with high doses of meropenem, tigecycline and amikacin, yielding carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) harboring K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2 from blood cultures on hospital day (HD) 23. Ceftazidime/avibactam was started at HD 37 and CRKP was eradicated from blood cultures after 5 days. However, ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant CRKP carrying KPC-44 emerged after 26 days of ceftazidime/avibactam treatment and then ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant, carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae carrying KPC-135 was isolated on HD 65. The 3-D homology of KPC protein showed that hot spot changes in the omega loop could be attributed to ceftazidime/avibactam resistance and loss of carbapenem resistance. Whole genome sequencing of serial isolates supported that phenotypic variation was due to clonal evolution than clonal replacement. The treatment regimen was changed from CAZ/AVI to meropenem-based therapy (meropenem 1 g iv q 8 hours and amikacin 600 mg iv per day) starting with HD 72. CAZ/AVI-susceptible CRKP was presented again from blood cultures on HD 84, and the patient expired on HD 85. This is the first Korean report on the acquisition of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance through the emergence of blaKPC variants.

Complex evolutionary trajectories in vivo of two novel KPC variants conferring ceftazidime-avibactam resistance.

More and more ceftazidime-avibactam resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae have been reported with its widespread use, and the detection rate of KPC variants has increased dramatically. However, the evolutionary mechanism and fitness effects during KPC mutation remained unknown. Here, we report the complex in vivo evolutionary trajectories of two novel KPC variants, KPC-155 (L169P/GT242A) and KPC-185 (D179Y/GT242A), from Klebsiella pneumoniae in the same patient. The novel variants were shown to confer ceftazidime-avibactam resistance but restore carbapenem susceptibility based on the results of plasmid transformation assays, cloning experiments, and enzyme kinetic measurements. In vitro competition experiments highlighted the adaptive advantage conferred by strains carrying these KPC variants, which could lead to the rapid spread of these ceftazidime-avibactam resistant strains. The growth curve indicated that blaKPC-185 had better growth conditions at lower avibactam concentration compared to blaKPC-155, which was consistent with ceftazidime-avibactam use in vivo. In addition, replicative transposition of the IS26-flanked translocatable unit (IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-IS26) also contributes to the blaKPC amplification and formation of two copies (blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-185), conferring both carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. However, strains with double copies showed reduced competitive advantage and configuration stability. The comparative plasmid analysis of IS26 group (IS26-blaKPC-IS26) and Tn1721 group (Tn1721-blaKPC-IS26) revealed that IS26-insertion could influence the distribution of resistance genes and ability of self-conjugation. The dynamic changes in blaKPC configuration highlight the need for consistent monitoring including antimicrobial susceptibility testing and determination of blaKPC subtypes-during clinical treatment, especially when ceftazidime-avibactam is administered.

Change in Klebsiella pneumoniae susceptibility profile after the arrival of ceftazidime-avibactam in an Argentinean intensive care unit: a new ecological landscape.

OBJECTIVE: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is a good option for Gram-negative bacilli infections that produce carbapenemase Classes A (especially blaKPC) and D (blaOXA). However, it is unknown whether it would have an impact on metallo-ß-lactamases (blaMBL) selection. The aim of the study was to compare carbapenem and CZA Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN) susceptibility profiles for a period of two years following the introduction of CZA. METHODS: The study was conducted in a 36-bed adult ICU of a tertiary hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Antimicrobial consumption was expressed as days of treatment per 100 patients-day (DOT). RESULTS: A total of 123 KPN strains in the first year and 172 in the second year were analyzed. An alarming decrease in carbapenem susceptibility was detected in the second year (OR 0.5 [0.3-0.8] p<.001). In parallel, there was a decrease in CZA susceptibility (OR 0.5 [0.3-0.9] p<.05). These findings were linked to a rise in blaMBL-KPN (32.1% vs. 45.1%, OR 1.7 [1.1-2.9], p <.04) during the second year. This new KPN susceptibility profile promoted an increment in CZA (1.0 DOT vs. 6.6 DOT, OR 6.6 [4.9-9.1] p<.001) and aztreonam (0.3 DOT vs. 4.1 DOT, OR 16.3 [9.1-29.3] p<.001) consumption. Thus, there was a decrease in carbapenem prescription (17.8 DOT vs. 15.4 DOT, OR 0.8 [0.8-0.9] p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was an escalation of blaMBL-KPN rate two years after CZA introduction, leading to a decrease in CZA and carbapenem susceptibility and an increase in CZA and aztreonam prescriptions.

Rates of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam among patients treated for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia.

Among consecutive patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia we found those treated with ceftazidime-avibactam were more likely to develop resistance (defined as ≥4-fold increased MIC) than those treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (40% vs. 10%; P=0.002). Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was associated with new mutations in ampC and efflux regulatory pathways.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against European Enterobacterales, including isolates resistant to meropenem and recentß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-|resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-|97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-|92.1% vs 0%-|88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and ß-|lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-|20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-|56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-ß-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in ß-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved ß-lac|tam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates. IMPORTANCE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.

Addressing the Global Threat of Multidrug-Resistant Infections: The Role of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Revisited.

Background and objective Bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) pose a significant global health threat amid rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) as a therapeutic option for these infections, addressing the urgent need for novel treatments. Materials and methods This study was conducted over one year in the Department of Microbiology, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru, India, and employed a laboratory-based prospective design. From a total of 376 positive blood cultures, 147 multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms were identified, and 100 were randomly selected for final analysis. Susceptibility testing via disk diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination was performed to evaluate CZA efficacy. Results Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) was the predominant (78%) organism among the subsets, with varying susceptibility patterns observed across species. The overall CZA susceptibility was 45%, with significant discrepancies between disk diffusion and gold standard testing. Notably, there was limited efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) Conclusions This study underscores the pressing need for reliable testing methods and novel treatment strategies in combating MDR infections. Further research with larger sample sizes is imperative to validate our findings and guide clinicians effectively in addressing this critical health challenge.

In vivo emergence of cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam cross-resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae following ceftazidime/avibactam -based therapies.

We described the emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol cross-resistance in patients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. All strains with ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol cross-resistance showed point mutations on KPC Ω-loop. Taken together, our results indicate that prolonged exposure to ceftazidime/avibactam can confer cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol.

Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance is associated with PER-3-producing ST309 lineage in Chilean clinical isolates of non-carbapenemase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Introduction: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is indicated against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly those that are carbapenem resistant. CZA resistance in P. aeruginosa producing PER, a class A extended-spectrum ß-lactamase, has been well documented in vitro. However, data regarding clinical isolates are scarce. Our aim was to analyze the contribution of PER to CZA resistance in non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates that were ceftazidime and/or carbapenem non-susceptible. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined through agar dilution and broth microdilution, while bla PER gene was screened through PCR. All PER-positive isolates and five PER-negative isolates were analyzed through Whole Genome Sequencing. The mutational resistome associated to CZA resistance was determined through sequence analysis of genes coding for PBPs 1b, 3 and 4, MexAB-OprM regulators MexZ, MexR, NalC and NalD, AmpC regulators AmpD and AmpR, and OprD porin. Loss of bla PER-3 gene was induced in a PER-positive isolate by successive passages at 43°C without antibiotics. Results: Twenty-six of 287 isolates studied (9.1%) were CZA-resistant. Thirteen of 26 CZA-resistant isolates (50%) carried bla PER. One isolate carried bla PER but was CZA-susceptible. PER-producing isolates had significantly higher MICs for CZA, amikacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, meropenem and ciprofloxacin than non-PER-producing isolates. All PER-producing isolates were ST309 and their bla PER-3 gene was associated to ISCR1, an insertion sequence known to mobilize adjacent DNA. PER-negative isolates were classified as ST41, ST235 (two isolates), ST395 and ST253. PER-negative isolates carried genes for narrow-spectrum ß-lactamases and the mutational resistome showed that all isolates had one major alteration in at least one of the genes analyzed. Loss of bla PER-3 gene restored susceptibility to CZA, ceftolozane/tazobactam and other ß-lactamsin the in vitro evolved isolate. Discussion: PER-3-producing ST309 P. aeruginosa is a successful multidrug-resistant clone with blaPER-3 gene implicated in resistance to CZA and other ß-lactams.

Synergistic Effect of Ceftazidime-Avibactam with Aztreonam on Carbapenemase-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae MBL+, NDM.

Background: The difficulties in attaining effective antibiotic therapy arising from the multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacilli compel the exploration of new possibilities for synergistic interactions among existing antibiotics. Research Design and Methods: An analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of two antibiotic therapy regimens in the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing carbapenemases (MBL). Two patient groups were considered: Group A - individuals in whom the treatment of infection involved the application of ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with aztreonam. Group B comprised patients subjected to an alternative antibiotic therapy regimen. Results: In the group subjected to the treatment regimen involving ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam, as compared to alternative antibiotic combinations, a statistically lower mortality rate during the course of treatment and a faster clinical response to the administered therapy were evident. Conclusion: The results obtained may be applicable to routine in vitro assays performed and serve as valuable guidance for the potential utilization of the positive effect of antibiotic therapy through the synergy between ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. The selection of antibiotics employed in the therapy of invasive infections caused by K. pneumoniae influences the ultimate treatment outcome.

The Safety of Aztreonam Versus Ceftazidime in Patients Labeled With Penicillin Allergy: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Penicillin allergy is the most common drug allergy among hospitalized patients. Traditionally, aztreonam is recommended for patients labeled with penicillin allergy (PLWPA) in our institutional empirical antibiotic guidelines. Due to a global aztreonam shortage in December 2022, the antimicrobial stewardship unit recommended ceftazidime as a substitute. There is a paucity of real-world data on the safety profile of ceftazidime in PLWPA. Hence, we evaluated tolerability outcomes of ceftazidime use in PLWPA. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared PLWPA in Singapore General Hospital who received aztreonam (October 2022-December 2022) or ceftazidime (December 2022-February 2023). Patients were stratified according to their risk of allergic reaction (AR) based on history of penicillin allergy. The severity of AR was based on the Delphi study grading system. The primary outcome was development of AR after initiation of aztreonam or ceftazidime. The secondary tolerability outcomes include hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity. FINDINGS: There were 168 patients in the study; 69 were men (41.1%) and the median age was 69 years (interquartile range: 59-76 years). Incidence of AR was statistically similar in both arms: 1 of 102 patients (0.98%) in the aztreonam arm vs 2 of 66 patients (3.03%) in the ceftazidime arm (P = 0.33). The patient in the aztreonam arm was deemed at medium risk of having an AR and developed localized rashes (grade 1). Both patients in the ceftazidime arm were deemed at high risk of AR and developed localized skin reaction (grade 1). Hepatotoxicity was observed in 1 patient prescribed aztreonam. No patients in the ceftazidime arm developed adverse events. IMPLICATIONS: Ceftazidime appears to be better tolerated and cheaper compared with aztreonam in PLWPA, and serves as an antimicrobial stewardship strategy to conserve broader-spectrum antibiotics use.

Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Children Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is one of the new antibiotics available to treat infections due to carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRB). Our aim was to describe the use of CAZ-AVI in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), with suspected or proven CRB infections. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in two PICUs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between January 2020 and January 2024. Children aged 0 to 18 years who received CAZ-AVI for more than 24 h were included. RESULTS: CAZ-AVI was used in 37 patients. The median age was 28 months (range 1-215), 17 (45.9%) being male. The median time from the patient admission to the initial prescription of CAZ-AVI was 39.9 days (range 1-138). Thirty-four (91.9%) children had at least one comorbidity at admission and (91.9%) used at least one invasive device prior to the CAZ-AVI prescription, and 89.2% had received carbapenem before; and fifteen (40.5%) had healthcare-associated infection (HAI) prior to CAZ-AVI use. The mean time of CAZ-AVI use was 11 days (range 1-22). Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in cultures from 12 (32.4%) patients in the 24 h prior to prescription or on the day of prescription. In five patients, CRB was confirmed in cultures, and in four (80%) of them, microbiological clearance was verified after 7 days of treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 37.8%. CONCLUSION: Almost all patients who used CAZ-AVI were critically ill children with multiple comorbidities and previous use of carbapenems. Among CRB confirmed infections, microbiology clearance in 7 days was high.

Identification of a Novel KPC Variant, KPC-204, Conferring Resistance to Both Carbapenems and Ceftazidime-Avibactam in an ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain.

This study describes KPC-204, a novel variant of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase, characterized by a Lys-Asp-Asp (KDD) amino acid insertion at Ambler position 269 deviates from KPC-2. This variant was identified in an ST11-type clinical isolate of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from China. Notably, KPC-204 exhibits resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems. Genetic analysis revealed that blaKPC-204 was located on a highly mobile IncFII/IncR plasmid within a complex genetic structure that facilitates its spread. Functional analysis, achieved through cloning into E. coli DH5α, validates KPC-204's contribution to increased resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam. The kinetic parameters showed that KPC-204 exhibited similar affinity to KPC-2 toward ceftazidime and reduced sensitivity to avibactam. Docking simulations revealed a weaker interaction between KPC-204 and avibactam compared to KPC-2. Mating experiments demonstrated the resistance's transmissibility. This investigation underscores the evolving diversity of KPC variants affecting ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, highlighting the necessity for continuous monitoring.

Detection of KPC-216, a Novel KPC-3 Variant, in a Clinical Isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 Co-Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Cefiderocol.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-KP) represents a global threat to public health, with limited antimicrobial therapeutic options. In this study, we analyzed a ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate obtained from a patient previously exposed to CAZ-AVI expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-3 variant. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using reference broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using Illumina and Nanopore Technologies. Short- and long-reads were combined with Unicycler. Assemblies were investigated for multilocus sequence typing (MLST), antimicrobial resistance genes, porins, and plasmids. RESULTS: The K. pneumoniae isolate (KP_RM_1) was resistant to CAZ-AVI, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, amikacin, ertapenem, and cefiderocol (FDC) but was susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam. WGS revealed that the KP_RM_1 genome is composed of a single chromosome of 5 Mbp and five circular plasmids. Further analysis showed the presence of novel blaKPC-216 located on a 72 kb plasmid. KPC-216 differs from KPC-3 by a Lysin (K) insertion at position 168 (+K168). CONCLUSIONS: We report the identification of a new KPC-3 variant associated with CAZ-AVI resistance. The KPC variants associated with CAZ-AVI resistance should be determined to promptly inform clinicians and start the appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Synergistic Combination of Aztreonam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam-A Promising Defense Strategy against OXA-48 + NDM Klebsiella pneumoniae in Romania.

With the increasing burden of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp), including high rates of healthcare-associated infections, treatment failure, and mortality, a good therapeutic strategy for attacking this multi-resistant pathogen is one of the main goals in current medical practice and necessitates the use of novel antibiotics or new drug combinations. OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the clinical and microbiological outcomes of seven patients treated at the "Agrippa Ionescu" Clinical Emergency Hospital between October 2023 and January 2024, aiming to demonstrate the synergistic activity of the ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A) plus aztreonam (ATM) combination against the co-producers of blaNDM + blaOXA-48-like CR-Kp. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven CR-Kp with blaNDM and blaOXA-48 as resistance mechanisms were tested. Seven patients treated with C/A + ATM were included. The synergistic activity of C/A + ATM was proven through double-disk diffusion in all seven isolates. Resistance mechanisms like KPC, VIM, OXA-48, NDM, IMP, and CTX-M were assessed through immunochromatography. RESULTS: With a mean of nine days of treatment with the synergistic combination C/A + ATM, all patients achieved clinical recovery, and five achieved microbiological recovery. CONCLUSIONS: With the emerging co-occurrence of blaOXA-48 and blaNDM among Kp in Romania, the combination of C/A and ATM could be a promising therapeutic option.

Activity of Aztreonam/Avibactam and Recently Approved ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Intensive Care Unit and Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients.

We evaluated the activities of aztreonam/avibactam and recently approved ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) to compare the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Clinical isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from 72 United States medical centres in 2020-2022 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. The results for 5421 isolates from ICU patients were analysed and compared to those for 20,649 isolates from non-ICU patients. Isolates from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients were analysed separately. Aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 100.0%/>99.9% Enterobacterales and 100.0%/98.3% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from ICU/non-ICU patients at ≤8 mg/L, respectively. The CRE susceptibility rates were 88.5%/82.9% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 82.1%/81.2% for meropenem/vaborbactam, and 78.2%/72.6% for imipenem/relebactam among ICU/non-ICU isolates. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU/non-ICU patients, the susceptibility rates were 96.3%/97.6% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 97.2/98.4% for ceftolozane/tazobactam, 97.1%/98.0% for imipenem/relebactam, 77.8%/84.6% for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 76.9%/85.8% for meropenem; aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 78.0%/81.9% of P. aeruginosa at ≤8 mg/L. In summary, lower susceptibility rates were observed among ICU than non-ICU isolates. Aztreonam/avibactam exhibited potent in vitro activity and broad-spectrum activity against Enterobacterales from ICU and non-ICU patients, including CRE and isolates non-susceptible to newer BLICs. Against P. aeruginosa, aztreonam/avibactam showed a spectrum of activity comparable to that of piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and ceftazidime.