Determination of ED90s of Phenylephrine and Norepinephrine Infusion for Prevention of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Patients with Preeclampsia During Cesarean Delivery.

Background: Vasopressors remain an important strategy for managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in women with preeclampsia. The aim of this study was to investigate the ED90s and efficacy ratio of phenylephrine and norepinephrine in managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in women with preeclampsia during cesarean delivery. Methods: 60 women with preeclampsia, who underwent cesarean delivery, were randomly assigned to receive either a continuous intravenous infusion of phenylephrine or norepinephrine following spinal anesthesia. The initial dosage of phenylephrine or norepinephrine for the first women was 0.5 or 0.05 µg/kg/min, respectively, and subsequent infusion dosages were adjusted based on their efficacy in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 80% of the baseline level). The incremental or decremental doses of phenylephrine or norepinephrine were set at 0.1 or 0.01 µg/kg/min. The primary outcomes were the ED90s and efficacy ratio of phenylephrine and norepinephrine infusions for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension prior to delivery. Results: The results obtained from isotonic regression analysis revealed that the ED90 values of the phenylephrine and norepinephrine group for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.597 (95% CI: 0.582-0.628) and 0.054 (95% CI: 0.053-0.056) µg/kg/min, respectively, with an efficacy ratio of 11.1:1. The results of Probit regression analysis revealed that the ED90 values were determined to be 0.665 (95% CI: 0.576-1.226) and 0.055 (95% CI: 0.047-0.109) µg/kg/min, respectively, with an efficacy ratio of 12.1:1. Conclusion: The administration of 0.6 µg/kg/min phenylephrine and 0.05 µg/kg/min norepinephrine has been found to effectively manage a 90% incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in women with preeclampsia.

Effects of epidural analgesia at 1 cm cervical dilatation on multiparae: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score-matching.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of epidural analgesia (EA) administered at cervical dilatation of 1 cm on multiparae who underwent vaginal delivery. METHODS: This propensity score-matched retrospective cohort research was conducted between 2021 and 2022. All the singleton multiparae who had previous successful vaginal deliveries and epidural analgesia during this delivery were screened for eligibility. The primary outcome was the effect of EA on the duration of labor. The main secondary outcomes included the incidence of cesarean delivery and umbilical arterial pH. RESULTS: This study incorporated 686 multiparae who were divided into two cohorts: EA 1 (cervical dilatation = 1 cm, n = 166) and EA 2 (cervical dilatation >1 cm, n = 520). In the propensity score-matched cohort (including 164 women in each group), there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of cesarean delivery (4 [2.4%] vs 4 [2.4%], P = 1.000), umbilical arterial pH (7.28 ± 0.06 vs 7.28 ± 0.07, P = 0.550) and other secondary outcomes between the two groups. Based on a comparative assessment of the women who delivered vaginally to the Kaplan-Meier curves and propensity score-matching (including 160 women in each group), there was no statistical significance in the duration of the first, second and third stages of labor (log rank P, P = 0.811; P = 0.413; P = 0.773, respectively). CONCLUSION: Initiation of epidural analgesia at cervical dilatation of 1 cm in multiparae did not cause adverse effects with regard to the duration of labor, increased cesarean deliveries, and bad neonatal outcomes.

Friedreich's Ataxia and Cesarean Delivery: A Case Report of Epidural Anesthesia With Ropivacaine.

Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA), a rare inherited neurodegenerative disease, presents distinctive complexities in obstetrical anesthesia. Available research about FRDA in obstetrics is extremely limited. In this report, the anesthetic management of a 40-year-old primigravida with FRDA undergoing cesarean delivery is presented. An uneventful cesarean delivery with effective epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine at the L2-L3 intervertebral space was performed in our case. Neither hypotension nor bradycardia was observed, and vital signs remained stable, with no need for administration of vasoactive drugs. After discharge, the parturient reported no change in her neurologic symptoms. Conclusive recommendations are contingent upon more extensive studies. Overall management and the choice to proceed with neuraxial anesthesia in a woman with FRDA should be based on comprehensive consultations in both cardio-obstetrics and pre-anesthetic evaluations.

Maternal Morbidity following Trial of Labor after Cesarean in Women Experiencing Antepartum Fetal Death.

This study aims to investigate whether trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in women with antepartum fetal death, is associated with an elevated risk of maternal morbidity. A retrospective multicenter. TOLAC of singleton pregnancies following a single low-segment incision were included. Maternal adverse outcomes were compared between women with antepartum fetal death and women with a viable fetus. Controls were matched with cases in a 1:4 ratio based on their previous vaginal births and induction of labor rates. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. During the study period, 181 women experienced antepartum fetal death and were matched with 724 women with viable fetuses. Univariate analysis revealed that women with antepartum fetal death had significantly lower rates of TOLAC failure (4.4% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.01), but similar rates of composite adverse maternal outcomes (6.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.38) and uterine rupture (0.6% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.56). Multivariable analyses controlling for confounders showed that an antepartum fetal death vs. live birth isn't associated with the composite adverse maternal outcomes (aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.21-4.44, p = 0.95). TOLAC in women with antepartum fetal death is not associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes while showing high rates of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).

A Retrospective Exploration of Pre-operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefazolin in Cesarean Sections: Implications for Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery.

Background: Post-partum infection is a major contributor to maternal mortality and is responsible for approximately 10% of maternal fatalities worldwide. The risk of infection is substantially higher in cesarean section procedures. Approximately 8% of women who undergo cesarean sections are susceptible to infection. Although the body of evidence supporting the regular pre-operative utilization of prophylactic antibiotic treatment is steadily expanding, its usefulness in cesarean sections has not yet been standardized, and post-partum infection is still a serious medical challenge. We aimed to retrospectively assess the prophylactic effectiveness of cefazolin in combination with other antibiotic agents in cesarean sections. Materials and Methods: Both uni-variable and multi-variable analyses were conducted to identify factors that may affect cefazolin pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean section operations. The uni-variable analysis included timing of administration, operation duration, body mass index (BMI), and wound type. A multi-variable logistic regression model was then created to determine which variables provide independent information in the context of other variables. Results: Time of administration did not affect prophylactic cefazolin efficacy. However, prophylactic cefazolin was 1.43 and 1.77 times more effective when the operation lasted for 45 minutes or more, compared with operations that were shorter than 45 minutes. Patients with a BMI ranging from 18 to 29 kg/m2 showed increased efficacy of prophylactic cefazolin compared with obese patients with a BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2. The effectiveness of prophylactic cefazolin decreased by 95% in patients with clean-contaminated surgical incisions compared with those with clean surgical incisions. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that administering pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic agents to women undergoing cesarean section resulted in a reduction in post-partum infections, thereby reducing maternal mortality. Furthermore, optimal timing of administration, re-dosing if necessary, length of prophylactic medication, and dosing adjustments for obese patients are crucial factors in preventing surgical site infections and promoting antimicrobial stewardship.

Lateness of Acetaminophen and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Administrations in a Retrospective Cohort of Medication Administration Records Among Patients After Cesarean Delivery.

INTRODUCTION: In an earlier study of patients after cesarean delivery, the concurrent versus alternating administration of acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was associated with a substantial reduction in total postoperative opioid use. This likely pharmacodynamic effect may differ if the times when nurses administer acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs often differ substantively from when they are due. We examined the "lateness" of analgesic dose administration times, the positive difference if administered late, and the negative value if early. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study used all 67,900 medication administration records for scheduled (i.e., not "as needed") acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and ketorolac among all 3,163 cesarean delivery cases at the University of Iowa between January 2021 and December 2023. Barcode scanning at the patient's bedside was used right before each medication administration. RESULTS: There were 95% of doses administered over a 4.8-hour window, from 108 minutes early (97.5% one-sided upper confidence limit 105 minutes early) to 181 minutes late (97.5% one-sided lower limit 179 minutes late). Fewer than half of doses (46%, P <0.0001) were administered ±30 minutes of the due time. The intraclass correlation coefficient was approximately 0.11, showing that there were small systematic differences among patients. There likewise were small to no systematic differences in lateness based on concurrent administrations of acetaminophen and ibuprofen or ketorolac, time of the day that medications were due, weekday, year, or number of medications to be administered among all such patients within 15 minutes. DISCUSSION: Other hospitals should check the lateness of medication administration when that would change their ability to perform or apply the results of analgesic clinical trials (e.g., simultaneous versus alternating administration).

Pharmacologic Analgesia for Cesarean Section: An Update in 2024.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: With the increasing prevalence of cesarean section globally, the importance of perioperative analgesia for cesarean section is becoming increasingly evident. This article provides an overview and update on the current status of cesarean section worldwide and associated analgesic regimens. RECENT FINDINGS: Some recent studies unveiled potential association of neuraxial analgesia might be associated with children's autism, pharmacologic analgesia in obstetric will potentially gain some more attention. Various commonly used techniques and medications for analgesia in cesarean section are highlighted. While neuraxial administration of opioid remains the most classic method, the use of multimodal analgesia, particularly integration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, peripheral nerve blocks has provided additional and better options for patients who are not suitable for intrathecal and neuraxial techniques and those experiencing severe pain postoperatively. Optimal pain management is crucial for achieving better clinical outcomes and optimal recovery, and with the continuous development of medications, more and better pharmacologic regimen will be available in the future.

A retrospective study of pre-operative fasting times prior to elective or emergency cesarean birth in a large maternity hospital: Lessons to be learned to minimize the fasting time.

INTRODUCTION: When managing elective and emergency cesarean births in the same operating room, unpredictable variations in the start times of the cesareans can prolong fasting periods. METHODS: The fasting times were retrospectively analyzed on 279 consecutive cesarean births at Helsinki University Women's Hospital, Finland, during January-February 2023. The fasting times were compared between the urgency groups and for elective cesareans according to their scheduled order on the operation list. The primary outcome was the difference in the fasting times for food and drink, while the secondary outcome was fasting for both food >12 h and fluids >4 h. The fasting times were compared by one-way ANOVA and chi-squared test, respectively. Dichotomous data are presented as unadjusted odds ratios (OR with 95% CI). RESULTS: Increasing urgency was associated with shorter fasting times. Fasting times for elective cesareans increased with the scheduled order on the daily list. The mean fasting periods (SD) increased from 10.55 h (SD=1.57) to 14.75 h (SD=2.02) from the first to the third cesarean of the day (p<0.01). The unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for fasting of the scheduled cesareans to exceed 12 h for solid foods and 4 h for clear fluids was 6.53 (95% CI: 2.67-15.9, p<0.001), for the third and fourth cesareans compared to the first two cesareans of the day. CONCLUSIONS: When elective and emergency cesareans are performed by the same team, the woman undergoing the third elective surgery of the day should be advised to have breakfast before 5 a.m. at home. While waiting for the operation, a carbohydrate drink should be offered to limit the fast.

Postoperative analgesic consumption for primary versus first repeat Cesarean delivery: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: It is unclear if postoperative pain experience and opioid consumption differ in patients undergoing primary vs repeat Cesarean delivery (CD) as prior studies have yielded conflicting results and none used the same patients as their own controls. We sought to compare opioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing both a primary and a first repeat CD, using the same patients as their own controls. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre historical cohort study of patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD under neuraxial anesthesia between 1 January 2016 and 30 November 2022. The same standardized multimodal analgesic regimen was used for all patients. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME) at 48 hr after surgery. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve for pain scores at 24 and 48 hr, and opioid consumption at 24 hr. RESULTS: We included 409 patients. In unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences between primary and repeat CD in median [interquartile range] opioid consumption at 48 hr (45 [15-89] mg vs 45 [15-83] mg OME) or in any of the secondary outcomes. In the multivariable model adjusting for age, body mass index, anxiety, depression, priority, surgery duration, gestational age, receipt of postoperative ketorolac, and neuraxial type, repeat CD was still not associated with increased opioid consumption compared with primary CD (adjusted rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we found no differences in postoperative opioid consumption or reported pain scores in patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous ne savons pas si l'expérience de la douleur postopératoire et la consommation d'opioïdes diffèrent chez la patientèle accouchant par césarienne pour la première fois ou pour la seconde fois. En effet, les études antérieures ont donné des résultats contradictoires et aucune n'a utilisé la même patientèle comme témoins. Nous avons cherché à comparer la consommation d'opioïdes et les scores de douleur chez les personnes parturientes exposées à la fois à un premier puis un deuxième accouchement par césarienne en recrutant les mêmes personnes en tant que leurs propres témoins. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte historique monocentrique auprès de personnes parturientes ayant subi à la fois une première et une seconde césarienne sous anesthésie neuraxiale entre le 1er janvier 2016 et le 30 novembre 2022. Le même régime analgésique multimodal standardisé a été utilisé pour toutes les personnes dans l'étude. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la consommation d'opioïdes en équivalents morphine oraux (EMO) 48 heures après la chirurgie. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la surface sous la courbe pour les scores de douleur à 24 et 48 heures, et la consommation d'opioïdes à 24 heures. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 409 personnes. Dans l'analyse non ajustée, il n'y avait pas de différence significative entre le premier et le deuxième accouchement par césarienne en ce qui concerne la consommation médiane d'opioïdes [écart interquartile] à 48 heures (45 [15 à 89] mg vs 45 [15­83] mg EMO) ou dans l'un des critères d'évaluation secondaires. Dans le modèle multivarié ajusté en fonction de l'âge, l'indice de masse corporelle, l'anxiété, la dépression, la priorité, la durée de la chirurgie, l'âge gestationnel, l'administration de kétorolac postopératoire et le type d'anesthésie neuraxiale, une deuxième césarienne n'était toujours pas associée à une consommation accrue d'opioïdes par rapport à une première césarienne (rapport de taux ajusté, 1,20; intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 0,95 à 1,51). CONCLUSION: Dans cette étude rétrospective, nous n'avons trouvé aucune différence dans la consommation d'opioïdes postopératoires ou les scores de douleur rapportés chez la patientèle ayant accouché par césarienne pour la première ou pour la deuxième fois.

Proactive Coping in Early Pregnancy and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

Objective: Outside of pregnancy, proactive coping has been associated with both mental and physical well-being and with improved quality of life in chronic disease, but its effects in pregnancy are understudied. Our objective was to evaluate whether early pregnancy proactive coping was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Study Design: This was a planned secondary analysis of nulliparous pregnant people recruited from a tertiary care center. Participants completed a validated assessment of proactive coping (Proactive Coping Scale) at 8-20 weeks and were followed longitudinally through delivery. Detailed pregnancy and delivery data were collected by trained research personnel. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes including unplanned cesarean delivery, gestational diabetes, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Secondary analyses included individual perinatal composite components and a neonatal morbidity composite measure. Multivariate regression compared adverse perinatal outcomes by Proactive Coping Scale quartile, controlling for a priori confounders. Results: Of the 281 parturients, the median Proactive Coping Scale score was 45.0 (range 25-55), and 47% experienced an adverse perinatal outcome. After adjusting for confounders, those in the lowest Proactive Coping Scale quartile had 2.2 times higher odds of experiencing an adverse perinatal outcome compared to those in the highest Proactive Coping Scale quartile. There were no differences in odds of the individual composite components or the adverse neonatal outcome. Conclusion: Lower early pregnancy proactive coping scores are associated with significant increase in adverse perinatal outcomes. Interventions that target improving proactive coping may be a novel mechanism for reducing perinatal morbidity.

Proactive coping is the process of preparing for a stressor or goal, which has been studied in the context of chronic disease. We sought to understand how proactive coping relates to pregnancy outcomes. Our results indicated that higher proactive coping scores were associated with lower risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, interventions to increase proactive coping may have a role in reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Join point trends of instrumental vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria (2002-2017).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the trends of instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and cesarean section (CS) at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Nigeria, over 16 years, from 2002 to 2017. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study. The case records of all women who had IVD and CS during the study period were reviewed. The trends in the IVD and CS rates were evaluated using join point regression modeling. The average annual percent change (AAPC) and annual percent change (APC) with associated 95% confidence interval of segmental trends were calculated. RESULTS: The overall IVD rate was 1.36%. Vacuum delivery rate was higher than forceps (0.79% vs 0.57%). The CS rate was 44.9 per 100 deliveries; the rate increased by about 3.7% per annum. CS rates were 7.1-89.9 times the IVD rates within the study period. The number of IVDs performed in the hospital declined by about 83.02%, from 53 cases in 2002 to nine cases in 2017. Forceps delivery declined at a faster rate than vacuum delivery between 2002 and 2017 (AAPC for forceps: -12.6% [-17.5 to -7.5], P < 0.001 vs AAPC for vacuum: -6.2% [-14.3 to 2.7], P = 0.200). The commonest indication for IVD was prolonged second stage of labor (47/162, 29.01%) and shortening of the second stage of labor for maternal conditions (47/162, 29.01%). CONCLUSION: IVD rates are low and declining at LUTH. There is need to train accoucheurs on the safe use of IVDs to potentially reduce the CS rate.

Fulfillment of Permanent Contraception among Patients with Cesarean Delivery in a Multi-Site Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the association between insurance type and permanent contraception fulfillment among those with cesarean deliveries. Additionally, we sought to examine modification by the scheduled status of the cesarean. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from a multi-site cohort study of patients who delivered in 2018-2019 at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Illinois, MetroHealth Medical System in Ohio, or University of Alabama at Birmingham in Alabama. All patients had permanent contraception as their contraceptive plan in their medical chart during delivery hospitalization. We used logistic regression to model the association between insurance type, scheduled status of cesarean and permanent contraception fulfillment by hospital discharge. The scheduled status of cesarean delivery was examined as an effect modifier. RESULTS: Compared to patients with private insurance, those with Medicaid were less likely to have their desired permanent contraception procedure fulfilled by hospital discharge (89.3% vs. 96.8%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, patients with Medicaid had a lower odds of permanent contraception fulfillment by hospital discharge (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.77). This association was stronger among those who had unscheduled cesarean deliveries (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.74) than those with scheduled cesarean deliveries (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.32, 1.88). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Compared to patients with private insurance undergoing a cesarean delivery, those with Medicaid insurance were less likely to have their desired permanent contraception fulfilled. Physicians and hospitals must examine their practices surrounding Medicaid forms to ensure that patients have valid consent forms available at the time of delivery.

Preference and Associated Factors for Cesarean Delivery Among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective: A cesarean delivery is regarded as a comparatively favourable and secure approach to childbirth when contrasted with vaginal delivery. Over the past decade, its frequency has risen in both industrialized and developing nations. Maternal request for cesarean delivery has been explained for the escalating rate along with other factors like anxiety, fear of childbirth, previous cesarean delivery, previous negative vaginal birth experience, maternal age, maternal education, and socioeconomic factors. Hence, this study was undertaken to assess pregnant women's tendency to have a cesarean birth and to investigate the factors associated with the inclination for cesarean delivery. Materials and methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of a tertiary care hospital, a systematic sampling procedure was utilized, and 368 antenatal mothers after 36 weeks of gestation, who do not have any specific medical reasons against vaginal delivery were included in the study. Data collection was done by questionnaire. The information regarding socio-demographic factors, preexisting comorbidities, current obstetric risk factors, emotional factors, previous delivery experience, and their information preference toward the mode of delivery were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify the independent variables associated with preference for cesarean delivery. Results: The preference for cesarean delivery and non-preference for cesarean delivery was 114 (30.9%) and 201 (54.6%), respectively whereas 53 (14.4%) participants remained neutral. The Chi-square analysis revealed a notable connection between the inclination towards a preference for cesarean delivery and factors such as obstetric score, parity, comorbidities, and among obstetric risk factors such as pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization (IVF), with a history of abortion, and having a prior history of cesarean delivery. Nevertheless, no meaningful association was observed between the preference for cesarean delivery and the remaining variables. On multivariate logistic analysis, independent variables like preexisting anxiety or depression, pregnancy through IVF, and having a history of previous cesarean delivery have increased the odds of preferring cesarean delivery. The independent variables like increasing gestational age, graduates, and unemployed have decreased the odds of preferring a cesarean delivery. Conclusion: In conclusion, the prevalence of cesarean delivery is influenced by a complex interplay of medical, cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare system factors. While cesarean delivery is essential in cases of medical necessity, efforts should be made to avoid unnecessary cesarean delivery that does not provide clear benefits over vaginal delivery. Balancing the risks and benefits of cesarean delivery and promoting evidence-based obstetric practices are crucial for ensuring optimal maternal and infant outcomes.

Effect of an increased dose of intrathecal fentanyl on cesarean delivery anesthesia at a Texas level IV maternal care center.

Background: We hypothesized that increasing our intrathecal fentanyl dose for cesarean delivery from 10 µg to 15 µg would result in fewer patients receiving a rescue analgesia intervention. Methods: Patients who had a cesarean delivery from February 15, 2021 to February 14, 2023 and received a single injection spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthetic for cesarean delivery were eligible for inclusion. We defined a rescue analgesia intervention as administration of local anesthetic through an epidural catheter, administration of systemic anesthetic adjuvant medication, or conversion to general anesthesia. Results: A total of 520 and 556 patients received 10 µg and 15 µg of intrathecal fentanyl for cesarean delivery, respectively, of which 154 (29.6%) and 122 (21.9%) patients required rescue analgesia interventions, respectively (P = 0.004). The odds ratio for receiving a rescue analgesia intervention was 0.668 (95% confidence interval 0.507 to 0.880; P = 0.004) for patients who received 15 µg of intrathecal fentanyl compared to 10 µg. Conclusion: Following implementation of an increased dose of intrathecal fentanyl, patients who received 15 µg of intrathecal fentanyl for cesarean delivery were approximately 33% less likely to require a rescue analgesia intervention during cesarean delivery compared to patients who received 10 µg.

Pregnancy outcomes by hyperemesis gravidarum severity and time of diagnosis: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: With inconsistencies regarding the possible effect of hyperemesis gravidarum on the course of pregnancy, this research aimed to study the association between hyperemesis gravidarum and pregnancy outcomes, while also addressing the trimester of diagnosis and severity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed, including all singleton deliveries of mothers from the largest health maintenance organization in the country, in a single tertiary hospital between 1991 and 2021. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was compared between pregnancies with and without hyperemesis gravidarum diagnosis. Multivariable generalized estimation equation binary models were used to study the association between maternal hyperemesis gravidarum, trimester of diagnosis and hyperemesis gravidarum severity and the studied outcomes. RESULTS: The study population included 232 476 pregnancies, of which 3227 (1.4%) were complicated with hyperemesis gravidarum. Women with hyperemesis gravidarum were more likely to deliver preterm (adj. OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.18-1.50), a newborn with low birthweight (adj. OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16-1.98, only if diagnosed in the second trimester), and to have a cesarean delivery (adj. OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.09-1.32). They were less likely to deliver small gestational age newborn (adj. OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99) and their offspring to experience perinatal mortality (adj. OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.93, among mild cases only). A dose-response association was observed between preterm birth and hyperemesis gravidarum (adj. OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.11-1.44, for mild cases and adj. OR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.31-3.19, for severe cases). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperemesis gravidarum is associated with an increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes including mainly preterm delivery in a dose-response manner and when diagnosed during the second trimester.

Rural-urban and racial differences in cesarean deliveries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina.

PROBLEM: Unnecessary cesarean delivery increases the risk of complications for birthing people and infants. BACKGROUND: Examining the intersectionality of rural and racial disparities in low-risk cesarean delivery is necessary to improve equity in quality obstetrics care. AIM: To evaluate rural and racial/ethnic differences in Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV) and primary cesarean delivery rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used birth certificates linked to all-payer hospital discharge data for South Carolina childbirths from 2018 to 2021. Multilevel logistic regressions examined differences in cesarean outcomes by rural/urban hospital location and race/ethnicity of birthing people during pre-pandemic (January 2018-February 2020) and peri-pandemic periods (March 2020-December 2021), adjusting for maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics among two low-risk pregnancy cohorts: 1) Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV, n = 65,974) and 2) those without prior cesarean (primary, n = 167,928). FINDINGS: Black vs. White disparities remained for NTSV cesarean in adjusted models (urban pre-pandemic aOR = 1.34, 95 %CI 1.23-1.46) but were not significantly different for primary cesarean, apart from rural settings peri-pandemic (aOR = 0.87, 95 %CI 0.79-0.96). Hispanic individuals had higher adjusted odds of NTSV cesarean only for rural settings pre-pandemic (aOR = 1.28, 95 %CI 1.05-1.56), but this disparity was not significant during the pandemic (aOR = 1.13, 95 %CI 0.93-1.37). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Observed rural and racial/ethnic disparities in cesarean delivery outcomes were present before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies effective in reducing racial disparities in primary cesarean may be useful in also reducing Black vs. White NTSV cesarean disparities.

Accidental uterine extensions in cesarean deliveries - outcome of subsequent pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcome in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with an accidental uterine extension (AUE) during cesarean delivery (CD), as well as the relationship between the different types of AUE (inferior, lateral and superior). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all CD with AUE in a tertiary medical center between 01/2011-01/2022. Women with a prior CD with AUE were compared to a 1:3 ratio matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE. All AUE were defined in their direction, size and mode of suturing. CD with deliberate uterine extensions were excluded. We evaluated obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with AUE during CD. RESULTS: Comparing women with a prior CD with AUE (n=177) to the matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE (n=528), we found no significant differences in proportions of uterine rupture or any other major complication or adverse outcome between the groups. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy in relation to the characteristics of the AUE (direction, size and mode of suturing). CONCLUSIONS: Subsequent pregnancies after AUE are not associated with higher maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes including higher proportions of uterine rupture compared to pregnancies without previous AUE. Different characteristics of the AUE do not impact the outcome.

Effect of pneumatic leg compression on phenylephrine dose for hypotension prophylaxis via variable rate infusion at cesarean delivery: an unblinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine infusion is recommended to prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery (CD) but may be associated with dose-dependent side effects. We hypothesized that adding intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) of the lower legs to a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion will reduce the dose of phenylephrine required during CD. METHODS: Seventy-six healthy women undergoing elective CD under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to IPC or control groups (n = 38 per group). After spinal anesthesia, IPC of the lower legs was initiated in the IPC group, and all women received a phenylephrine infusion starting at 25 µg·min-1 and increasing by 16.7 µg·min-1 for systolic blood pressure (SAP) < 90% baseline. If hypotension (SAP < 80% baseline) occurred, 100 µg phenylephrine bolus was administered. The primary outcome was the dose of phenylephrine per minute. RESULTS: The dose of phenylephrine per minute (34.4 ±â€¯7.3 µg·min-1 vs. 40.9 ±â€¯9.5 µg·min-1, P = 0.001; mean difference -6.6 µg·min-1, 95% CI -10.5 to -2.7 µg·min-1) and the incidence of hypotension (24% vs. 55%, P = 0.005) were lower in the IPC group than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the total dose of phenylephrine (603.2 ±â€¯217.1 µg vs. 706.2 ±â€¯247.5 µg, P = 0.058; mean difference -102.9 µg, 95% CI -209.4 to 3.5 µg), maternal side effects, or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent pneumatic compression combined with a variable-rate phenylephrine infusion reduced the phenylephrine dose per minute and the incidence of hypotension during CD under spinal anesthesia.