Pain in people seeking and receiving opioid agonist treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People with opioid use disorder (OUD) commonly experience pain including chronic pain. Despite the high prevalence, few studies have systematically examined the prevalence and correlates of pain among people seeking or receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for OUD. This review aimed to determine the prevalence of pain in this population globally, and estimate the association between chronic pain and other demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in three databases (Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) from the inception until October 2022. Eligible studies reported prevalence rates of current and/or chronic pain. Meta-analyses examining the main prevalence estimates were conducted by Stata SE 18.0, and comorbid clinical conditions were analysed by Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS: Fifty-six studies (n participants = 35 267) from sixty-seven publications were included. Prevalence estimates of current and chronic pain were reported in 27 (48.2%) and 40 studies (71.4%), respectively. Most studies were conducted in North America (71.4%, n = 40) and used cross-sectional designs (64.3%, n = 36). Meta-analyses revealed a pooled prevalence of 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.0-68.0) for current pain and 44.0% [95% CI: 40.0-49.0] for chronic pain. Chronic pain was positively associated with older age (mean deviation of mean age: 2.39 years, 95% CI: 1.40-3.37; I2 = 43%), unemployment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.76; I2 = 78%), more severe mental health symptoms (e.g. more severe depression (standardised mean difference [SMD] of mean scores: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.20-0.70; I2 = 48%) and anxiety symptoms (SMD: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.17-0.88; I2 = 67%), and hepatitis C (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.03-1.94; I2 = 0%). No association was observed between chronic pain and the onset and type of OAT, geographic location, study design, survey year, participant age or use of specific pain assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a high prevalence of pain among people seeking or receiving opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder compared with the general population, with positive associations for older age, unemployment, hepatitis C and the severity of some mental health symptoms.

Use of CYP2D6 substrates and inhibitors during pain management with analgesic opioids: Drug-drug interactions that lead to lack of analgesic effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Several opioids have pharmacogenetic and drug-drug interactions which may compromise their analgesic effectiveness, but are not routinely implemented into supportive pain management. We hypothesized that CYP2D6 phenotypes and concomitant use of CYP2D6 substrates or inhibitors would correlate with opioid analgesic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted with 263 adult chronic non cancer pain (CNCP) patients from a real-world pain unit under long-term CYP2D6-related opioid treatment (tramadol, hydromorphone, tapentadol or oxycodone). Metabolizer phenotype (ultrarapid [UM], normal [NM], intermediate [IM] or poor [PM]) was determined by the CYP2D6 genotype. The socio-demographic (sex, age, employment status), clinical (pain intensity and relief, neuropathic component, quality of life, disability, anxiety and depression), pharmacological (opioid doses and concomitant pharmacotherapy) and safety (adverse events) variables were recorded. RESULTS: The whole population (66 % female, 65 (14) years old, 70 % retired and 63 % attended for low back pain) were classified as PM (5 %), IM (32 %), NM (56 %) and UM (6 %). Multiple linear and logistic regressions showed higher pain intensity and neuropathic component at younger ages when using any CYP2D6 substrate (p = 0.022) or inhibitor (p = 0.030) drug, respectively, with poorer pain relief when CYP2D6 inhibitors (p=0.030) were present. CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of CYP2D6 substrates or inhibitors during opioid therapy for CNCP may result in lack of analgesic effectiveness. This aspect could be relevant for pharmacological decision making during CNCP management.

Public Perceptions of Opioid Use for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.

Background: Chronic non-cancer pain affects 20% of Americans. This is significantly impacted by the ongoing opioid crisis and reduced opioid dispensing. Public perceptions additionally shape pain management strategies. Purpose: This study explores public attitudes toward prescription opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. We aim to understand how public attitudes are influenced by the evolving opioid crisis and shifting opioid use patterns. Methods: In Michigan, 823 adults participated in a Qualtrics survey on attitudes toward nonmedical and medical prescription opioid use. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with beliefs that doctors prescribe opioids for too long (Model 1) and chronic pain patients should transition to alternative treatments (Model 2). Results: About half (49.4%) of respondents believed doctors keep patients on prescription opioids for too long, while two-thirds (65.7%) agreed chronic pain patients should be tapered off medications. Knowing someone who misused opioids and perceptions of substance use (e.g. perceived risk of prescription opioid misuse, stigma toward chronic pain patients, perceived prevalence of prescription opioid misuse, and awareness of fentanyl) were associated with greater odds of believing doctors keep patients on opioids too long. Demographics (age and education), substance use histories and perceptions (e.g. perceived risk and stigma) were associated with greater odds of believing patients should be tapered off their medication. Conclusions: These findings inform strategies to correct public misperceptions, emphasizing the importance of personal experience, perceived risks, and stigmatization of chronic pain patients. This insight can guide effective pain management for those with chronic non-cancer pain.

A Conceptual Analysis of Opioid Use Disorder in Chronic Noncancer Pain Using Rodger's Evolutionary Approach.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the complex nature of opioid use disorder (OUD) in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) by exploring its antecedents, attributes, consequences, and interrelated concepts. DESIGN: A systematic literature review was conducted to gather relevant studies published between 2015 and 2022, utilizing the CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases. DATA SOURCES: The selected databases provided a comprehensive range of articles related to OUD in CNCP, ensuring a comprehensive topic analysis. METHODS: Twenty-two articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. These articles were critically reviewed and analyzed to identify key themes and concepts related to OUD in CNCP. RESULTS: The findings of this study shed light on the multifaceted aspects of OUD in CNCP, including its antecedents, such as goals of physical function improvement, prescription of opioids for CNCP, social influences, and mental health dynamics. The attributes of OUD in CNCP were identified as chronic pain, noncancer pain, opioid use, misuse, and abuse. OUD's consequences in CNCP include impaired functioning, increased health risks, psychological distress, social challenges, and economic burden. CONCLUSION: Understanding the complexity of OUD in CNCP is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Collaborative efforts among healthcare systems, regulatory bodies, and professional organizations are needed to develop policies promoting safe and effective pain management while mitigating risks associated with opioid use in CNCP. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Implementing policy recommendations derived from this study enhances care and outcomes for individuals with CNCP. By addressing complex issues of OUD in CNCP and adopting evidence-based practices, healthcare providers can optimize pain management and promote well-being in CNCP patients.

Patients' perspectives about the role of primary healthcare providers in long-term opioid therapy: a qualitative study in Dutch primary care.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, long-term use of prescription opioids for chronic non-cancer pain has risen globally despite the associated risks. Most opioid users receive their first prescription in primary care. AIM: To investigate the perspective of patients who are long-term opioid users in primary care regarding the role of healthcare providers (HCPs) in their prolonged opioid use. DESIGN AND SETTING: Semi-structured interviews in Dutch primary care. METHOD: We recruited patients who were long-term users of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain from seven community pharmacies in the Netherlands. In-depth, semi-structured interviews focused on patients' experiences with long-term opioid use, access to opioids, and the guidance of their HCPs (primarily their GPs and pharmacists). A directed content analysis was conducted on the transcribed interviews using NVivo. RESULTS: Participants (n = 25) described ways in which HCPs impacted their long-term use of opioids. These encompassed the initiation of treatment, chronic use of opioids, and discontinuation of treatment. Participants stressed the need for risk counselling during initial prescribing, ongoing medication evaluations including tapering conversations, and more support from their HCP during a tapering attempt. CONCLUSION: Patients' perspectives illustrate the important role of HCPs across the spectrum of opioid use - from initiation to tapering. The results of this study underscore the importance of clear risk counselling starting at initial prescribing, repeated medication assessments throughout treatment, addressing tapering at regular intervals, and strong support during tapering. These insights carry significant implications for clinical practice, emphasising the importance of informed and patient-centred care when it comes to opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain management.

Chronic Non-cancer Pain and Associated Risks of Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

The goal of this study is to investigate the association between chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) development among adults aged ≥50 using administrative claims data from a national commercial health insurance company during 2007-2017. To reduce selection bias, propensity-score matching was applied to select comparable CNCP and non-CNCP patients. Time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards regressions were conducted to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of incident MCI/ADRDs. Of 170,900 patients with/without CNCP, 0.61% developed MCI and 2.33% had been diagnosed with ADRDs during the follow-up period. Controlling for potential confounders, CNCP patients had a 123% increase in MCI risk (HR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.92-2.58) and a 44% increase in ADRDs risk (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.34-1.54) relative to non-CNCP patients. CNCP is a risk factor for MCI/ADRDs. Promoting awareness and improving early CNCP diagnosis in middle-aged and older adults should be incorporated into cognitive impairment and dementia prevention.

Prescription of Opioid Analgesics for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in Germany despite Contraindications: Administrative Claims Data Analysis.

In Germany, long-term opioid treatment (L-TOT) for chronic non-tumor pain (CNTP) is discussed as not being performed according to the German guideline on L-TOT for CNTP. In the present analysis, the occurrence and predictors of inappropriate care/overuse in a cohort of German insureds with L-TOT for CNTP by the presence of a contraindication with concurrent opioid analgesic (OA) therapy were investigated. We also analyzed whether prescribing physicians themselves diagnosed a contraindication. The retrospective cohort study was based on administrative claims data from a German statutory health insurance. Eight contraindication groups were defined based on the German guideline. Logistic regressions were performed in order to identify predictors for OA prescriptions despite contraindications. The possible knowledge of the prescribing physician about the contraindication was approximated by analyzing concordant unique physician identification numbers of OA prescriptions and contraindication diagnoses. A total of 113,476 individuals (75% female) with a mean age of 72 years were included. The most common documented contraindications were primary headaches (8.7%), severe mood disorders (7.7%) and pain in somatoform disorders (4.5%). The logistic regressions identified a younger age, longer history of OA therapy, opioid related psychological problems, and outpatient psychosomatic primary care as positive predictors for all contraindication groups.

Is post-traumatic stress disorder a risk factor for development of opioid use disorder among individuals with chronic non-cancer pain? A systematic review.

Introduction: There is emerging evidence that posttraumatic-stress disorder may have mediating effects in development of chronic-non-cancer-pain and opioid-use-disorder independently, but its impact on the development of opioid-use-disorder in people with chronic-non-cancer pain is still unclear. Objectives: (i) Estimate the risk of opioid-use-disorder among individuals with chronic-non-cancer-pain and posttraumatic-stress disorder, relative to those with chronic-non-cancer-pain only, and (ii) identify potential correlates of opioid-use-disorder among people with chronic-non-cancer-pain and posttraumatic-stress disorder. Methods: This systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Longitudinal, epidemiological, cohort, follow-up, retrospective, prospective and cross-sectional studies reporting measures of variance on the likelihood of developing opioid-use-disorder with posttraumatic-stress disorder among individuals with chronic-non-cancer-pain were identified from six-electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Evidence-based Medicine reviews, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) until December 2022. Results: Three out of the four studies, which met the selection criteria for this analysis reported statistically significant positive association between risk of developing opioid-use-disorder with posttraumatic-stress disorder among chronic-non-cancer-pain cohort (unadjusted Relative-Risk range: 1.51-5.27) but this association was not evident in the fourth study (adjusted Relative-Risk: 0.96; statistically non-significant), when adjusted for sociodemographic variables. The increased risk was noted particularly with females and chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. Conclusions: Posttraumatic-stress disorder can increase the risk of development of opioid-use-disorder among people with chronic-non-cancer-pain and a better understanding of this relationship will help to predict and prevent the development of opioid-use-disorder and may also help in reducing the disability and burden associated with chronic-non-cancer-pain. Perspective: This review quantifies the risk of developing opioid-use-disorder in the context of posttraumatic-stress disorder among individuals with chronic-non-cancer-pain. Awareness and subsequent practice change will reduce the increasing global burden associated with the chronic-non-cancer-pain.

Trajectories of prescription opioid tapering in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: a retrospective cohort study, 2015-2020.

OBJECTIVE: To identify common opioid tapering trajectories among patients commencing opioid taper from long-term opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain and to examine patient-level characteristics associated with these different trajectories. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Australian primary care. SUBJECTS: Patients prescribed opioid analgesics between 2015 and 2020. METHODS: Group-based trajectory modeling and multinomial logistic regression analysis were conducted to determine tapering trajectories and to examine demographic and clinical factors associated with the different trajectories. RESULTS: A total of 3369 patients commenced a taper from long-term opioid therapy. Six distinct opioid tapering trajectories were identified: low dose / completed taper (12.9%), medium dose / faster taper (12.2%), medium dose / gradual taper (6.5%), low dose / noncompleted taper (21.3%), medium dose / noncompleted taper (30.4%), and high dose / noncompleted taper (16.7%). A completed tapering trajectory from a high opioid dose was not identified. Among patients prescribed medium opioid doses, those who completed their taper were more likely to have higher geographically derived socioeconomic status (relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.067; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001-1.137) and less likely to have sleep disorders (RRR, 0.661; 95% CI, 0.463-0.945) than were those who didn't complete their taper. Patients who didn't complete their taper were more likely to be prescribed strong opioids (eg, morphine, oxycodone), regardless of whether they were tapered from low (RRR, 1.444; 95% CI, 1.138-1.831) or high (RRR, 1.344; 95% CI, 1.027-1.760) doses. CONCLUSIONS: Those prescribed strong opioids and high doses appear to be less likely to complete tapering. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with the identified trajectories.

Opioid tapering and mental health crisis in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Opioid tapering and discontinuation have increased in recent years with the implementation of national prescribing guidelines. This study aimed to examine the relationship between opioid tapering velocity and mental health crisis events in older Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using the 2012-2018, 5% national Medicare claims data. Older adults with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) who were receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) were included in the study. Cases were defined as individuals experiencing mental health crisis events; controls were identified using incidence density sampling. The opioid tapering velocity was measured in the 120-day hazard period that yielded a monthly percentage of dose change. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of interest. RESULTS: A total of 42 091 older adults with CNCP were eligible for the study. Cases (n = 952) were matched with controls in a 1:2 ratio based on age (±1 year) and time of cohort entry (±30 days). A higher percentage of controls (67.65%) were on steady dose compared with cases (59.03%). In the adjusted model, tapering (aOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.02-1.83), rapid tapering (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.11-1.91), and dose escalation (aOR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.32-2.39) were significantly associated with the mental health crisis, compared with steady dose. CONCLUSION: Both opioid tapering and dose escalation are associated with mental health crisis events. Patient-driven and gradual dose tapering, as recommended by prescribing guidelines, should be promoted to prevent mental health crisis events among older adults on LTOT.

Risk factors for opioid addiction in chronic non-cancer pain.

Opioids are very effective pain medications, but they are not without complications. Its use in chronic cancer pain is clearly established, but not in chronic non-cancer pain. Opioid use has increased in recent years, but at the same time, it has been accompanied by an increase in side effects and related complications, including abuse, abuse and opioid addiction. If we look in the literature on the subject there is a global concern to make an adequate therapy with risk reduction, but the samples studied make it difficult to extrapolate results to the general population and even more so if we take into account factors such as psychiatric comorbidity. This leads us to consider the need to study our own population, its characteristics and see how it is being treated, to refine as much as possible on an appropriate prescription. The authors have carried out a cross-sectional study on patients with non-cancer chronic pain referred to psychiatry and the presence of opioid use disorder. We found risk factors related to the biopsychosocial characteristics of the patients and the characteristics of pain and its treatment. Knowing the risk factors, we can avoid yatrogeny, implement primary and secondary prevention and, ultimately, improve the quality of patient care.

A Decade of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Following Orthopedic Wrist Surgery: A Case Report and a Literature Review.

Every day, people of all ages in the United States break bones, with traumatic injury being the most common way, and wrist injury being in the top five most common areas in which bones break. Traumatic fractures are managed with either surgical or nonsurgical approaches. The surgical approach utilizes ortho procedures such as internal fixation and reduction, while the nonsurgical approach consists of procedures like RICE, ace bandage, and so on. However, in rare cases, patients are left with a peculiar constellation of symptoms, which cause edema, pain, skin changes, and loss of function at the trauma site. This occurrence is termed complex regional pain syndrome. Here, we present the case of a 55-year-old female patient who suffered a traumatic wrist injury. The trauma was fixed by pinning ORIF orthopedic surgery, and the patient developed manifestations of complex regional pain syndrome around 10 days postoperatively. In this case report, we describe the variation and complexity of symptoms in the patient over the course of a decade after the original injury. The case report explains the pain management therapies that reduced the patient's symptoms and highlights the ones that were ineffective. We have included some less frequently used yet effective treatments and shed light on how this disease affected the patient's overall well-being.

The intersection of drug use discrimination and racial discrimination in the management of chronic non-cancer pain in United States primary care safety-net clinics: Implications for healthcare system and clinic-level changes.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians' bias related to patients' race and substance use history play a role in pain management. However, patients' or clinicians' understandings about discriminatory practices and the structural factors that contribute to and exacerbate these practices are underexamined. We report on perceptions of discrimination from the perspectives of patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and a history of substance use and their clinicians within the structural landscape of reductions in opioid prescribing in the United States. METHODS: We interviewed 46 clinicians and 94 patients, using semi-structured interview guides, from eight safety-net primary care clinics across the San Francisco Bay Area from 2013 to 2020. We used a modified grounded theory approach to code and analyze transcripts. RESULTS: Clinicians discussed using opioid prescribing guidelines with the goals of increased opioid safety and reduced bias in patient monitoring. While patients acknowledged the validity of clinicians' concerns about opioid safety, they indicated that clinicians made assumptions about opioid misuse towards Black patients and patients suspected of substance use. Clinicians discussed evidence of discrimination in opioid prescribing at the clinic-wide level; racialized stereotypes about patients likely to misuse opioids; and their own struggles to overcome discriminatory practices regarding CNCP management. CONCLUSION: While clinicians and patients acknowledged opioid safety concerns, the practical application of opioid prescribing guidelines impacted how patients perceived and engaged with CNCP care particularly for patients who are Black and/or report a history of substance use. We recommend healthcare system and clinic-level interventions that may remediate discriminatory practices and associated disparities.

Patients Response to Interventional Care for Chronic Pain Study (PRICS): A Cross-Sectional Survey of Community-Based Pain Clinics in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Non-image guided injection treatments ("nerve blocks") are commonly provided in community pain clinics in Ontario for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) but remain controversial. AIM: We explored patients' perspectives of nerve blocks for CNCP. METHODS: We administered a 33-item cross-sectional survey to patients living with CNCP pain attending four community-based pain clinics in Ontario, Canada. The survey captured demographic information and asked about patient experiences with nerve blocks. RESULTS: Among 616 patients that were approached, 562 (91%) provided a completed survey. The mean age of respondents was 53 (SD 12), 71% were female, and the majority (57%) reported living with CNCP for more than a decade. Fifty-eight percent had been receiving nerve blocks for their pain for >3 years, 51% on a weekly frequency. Since receiving nerve blocks, patients self-reported a median improvement in pain intensity of 2.5 points (95% CI -2.5 to -3.0) on an 11-point numeric rating scale and 66% reported stopping or reducing prescription medications, including opioids. The majority who were not retired (62%) were receiving disability benefits and were unable to work in any capacity. When asked what impact cessation of nerve blocks would have, most employed patients (52%) reported they would be unable to work, and the majority indicated their ability to function across multiple domains would decrease. CONCLUSION: Our respondents who received nerve blocks for CNCP attribute important pain relief and functional improvement to this intervention. Randomized trials and clinical practice guidelines are urgently needed to optimize the evidence-based use of nerve blocks for CNCP.

Effects of state opioid prescribing cap laws on providers' opioid prescribing patterns among patients with chronic non-cancer pain.

Prior work suggests opioid prescribing cap laws are not associated with changes in opioid prescribing among patients with chronic pain. It is unknown how these effects differ by provider specialty, provider opioid prescribing volume, or patient insurer. This study assessed effects of state opioid prescribing cap laws on opioid prescribing among providers of patients with chronic non-cancer pain, by high volume prescribing, provider specialty, and patient insurer. We identified 224,290 providers of patients with low back pain, fibromyalgia, or headache from the IQVIA administrative database. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we examined impacts of opioid prescribing cap laws implemented between 2016 and 2018 on the annual proportion of a provider's patient panel who received any opioid prescription, as well as on dose and duration of opioid prescriptions. For providers overall, high volume prescribers, all specialties, and patient insurance categories, prescribing cap laws were associated with non-significant changes of <1.0, 1.5, and 3.5 percentage points in the proportion of chronic non-cancer patients receiving any opioid prescription, a prescription with 7 days' supply, or with >50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day, per year, respectively. There were two exceptions with high dose prescribing: prescribing cap laws were associated with a 1.5 percentage point increase in the proportion of high-volume prescribers' patient panel receiving an opioid prescription with ≥50 MME/day, and a 3.0 percentage point decrease in the same measure among surgeons. Among nearly all measured subgroups of providers and patient insurers, opioid prescribing cap laws were not associated with changes in opioid prescribing.

Feasibility and Acceptability of an Overdose Prevention Intervention Delivered by Community Pharmacists for Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.

There have been increases in prescriptions of high strength opioids for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), but CNCP patients perceive themselves as being at low risk of opioid overdose and generally have limited overdose awareness. This study examined how an overdose prevention intervention (opioid safety education, naloxone training, and take-home naloxone (THN)) delivered by community pharmacists for patients prescribed high-strength opioids for CNCP would work in practice in Scotland. Twelve patients received the intervention. CNCP patients and Community Pharmacists were interviewed about their experiences of the intervention and perceptions of its acceptability and feasibility. CNCP patients did not initially perceive themselves as being at risk of overdose but, through the intervention, developed insight into opioid-related risk and the value of naloxone. Pharmacists also identified patients' low risk perceptions and low overdose awareness. While pharmacists had positive attitudes towards the intervention, they outlined challenges in delivering it under time and resource pressures and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overdose prevention interventions are required in the CNCP population as this group has elevated risk factors for overdose but are commonly overlooked. Customised overdose prevention interventions for CNCP patients attend to gaps in overdose awareness and risk perceptions in this population.

Telehealth for management of chronic non-cancer pain and opioid use disorder in safety net primary care.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic increased use of telehealth for the management of opioid use disorder and chronic non-cancer pain in primary care safety net clinical systems. Significant barriers to telehealth exist, little is known about how these barriers impact urban safety net, primary care providers and their patients. The objective of this study was to qualitatively assess the benefits and challenges of telehealth for management of chronic non-cancer pain, opioid use disorder, and multi-morbidity in primary care, safety net clinical systems. METHODS: We interviewed patients with chronic non-cancer pain and history of substance use (n = 22) and their primary care clinicians (n = 7) in the San Francisco Bay Area, March-July 2020. We recorded, transcribed, coded, and content analyzed interviews. RESULTS: COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders contributed to increases in substance use and uncontrolled pain, and posed challenges for monitoring opioid safety and misuse through telehealth. None of the clinics used video visits due to low digital literacy/access. Benefits of telehealth included decreased patient burden and missed appointments and increased convenience and control of some chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, hypertension). Telehealth challenges included loss of contact, greater miscommunication, and less comprehensive care interactions. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the first to examine telehealth use in urban safety net primary care patients with co-occurring chronic non-cancer pain and substance use. Decisions to continue or expand telehealth should consider patient burden, communication and technology challenges, pain control, opioid misuse, and medical complexity.

Can academic detailing reduce opioid prescriptions in chronic non-cancer pain?

BACKGROUND: One measure to support optimal opioid prescription is academic detailing (AD) with one-to-one visits by trained professionals (academic detailers) to general practitioners (GPs). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of AD visits on GPs' opioid prescribing patterns in Norway, and academic detailers' experiences with AD visits to GPs on opioid prescription. METHODS: Design: A quantitative registry study on opioid prescriptions and a qualitative focus group interview study with academic detailers. PARTICIPANTS: For the registry study, municipalities where more than 75% of the GPs had received an AD visit were considered intervention municipalities, whereas in the non-intervention municipalities no GPs had received AD-visits. In the focus groups, academic detailers who had conducted three or more AD-visits were invited to participate. INTERVENTION: A campaign on opioid prescription with AD visits using a brochure with key messages based on the national guideline for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain and updated evidence on the potential benefits and risks of prescribing opioids. The AD visits in the campaign were planned for 20-25 min in a one-to-one setting in the GP's office. MAIN MEASURES: The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) was utilized for registry data. Data on amount of drugs dispensed are recoded as Defined Daily Doses (DDDs). RESULTS: Compared to non-intervention, the intervention resulted in a decrease in the number of prevalent and incident users of opioids and incident users of reimbursed opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in municipalities in Central Norway. The results from the focus group interviews were categorized into the themes: "To get in position", "Adjusting messages", "What did the GPs struggle with, in relation to opioid prescription?" and "Did we reach the right recipients with the visits?". CONCLUSIONS: In Central Norway, the intervention resulted in a desired effect on number of opioid users. According to the academic detailers, the GPs' length of working experience and familiarity with the topic gave different presumptions for making use of the information presented in the AD-visits.

Self-Management Programs for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: A Rapid Review of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: The body of evidence regarding self-management programs (SMPs) for adult chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is steadily growing, and regular updates are needed for effective decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify, critically appraise, and summarize the findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SMPs for CNCP. METHODS: We searched relevant databases from 2009 to August 2021 and included English-language RCT publications of SMPs compared with usual care for CNCP among adults (18+ years old). The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). We conducted meta-analysis using an inverse variance, random-effects model and calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) and statistical heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: From 8538 citations, we included 28 RCTs with varying patient populations, standards for SMPs, and usual care. No RCTs were classified as having a low risk of bias. There was no evidence of a significant improvement in overall HR-QoL, irrespective of pain type, immediately post-intervention (SMD 0.01, 95%CI -0.21 to 0.24; I2 57%; 11 RCTs; 979 participants), 1-4 months post-intervention (SMD 0.02, 95%CI -0.16 to 0.20; I2 48.7%; 12 RCTs; 1160 participants), and 6-12 months post-intervention (SMD 0.07, 95%CI -0.06 to 0.21; I2 26.1%; 9 RCTs; 1404 participants). Similar findings were made for physical and mental HR-QoL, and for specific QoL assessment scales (e.g., SF-36). CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence that SMPs are efficacious for CNCP compared with usual care. Standardization of SMPs for CNCP and better planned/conducted RCTs are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Reward Drive Moderates the Effect of Depression-Related Cognitive Mechanisms on Risk of Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Patients With Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.

Depression, a prognostic factor for prescription opioid misuse commonly occurs in people with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). However, the mechanisms linking depression and prescription opioid misuse remain unclear. This study examined the potential mediating role of pain catastrophizing in the association between depressive symptoms and prescription opioid misuse risk, and impulsivity traits as possible moderators of these relationships. Individuals (N = 198; 77% women) with CNCP using prescription opioids participated in a cross-sectional online survey with validated measures of depression, pain catastrophizing, rash impulsiveness, reward drive, anxiety, pain severity and prescription opioid misuse. Meditation analyses with percentile-based bootstrapping examined pathways to prescription opioid use, controlling for age, sex, pain severity, and anxiety symptoms. Partial moderated mediation of the indirect effect of depressive symptoms on prescription opioid misuse risk through pain catastrophizing by rash impulsiveness and reward drive were estimated. Pain catastrophizing mediated depressive symptoms and prescription opioid misuse risk. Indirect effects were stronger when moderate to high levels of reward drive were included in the model. Findings suggest the risk of prescription opioid misuse in those experiencing depressive symptoms and pain catastrophizing is particularly higher for those higher in reward drive. Treatments targeting these mechanisms may reduce opioid misuse risk. PERSPECTIVE: This article identifies reward drive as a potentially important factor increasing the effects of depression-related cognitive mechanisms on risk of prescription opioid misuse in those with CNCP. These findings could assist in personalizing clinical CNCP management to reduce the risks associated with opioid misuse.