Quality and access outcomes in 2 Veterans Health Administration facilities with fidelity to the comprehensive medication management framework.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Utilization of clinical pharmacists providing comprehensive medication management (CMM) has been shown to improve the quadruple aim of healthcare. Lack of fidelity surrounding CMM practice standardization components has led to heterogeneity in interpretation of clinical pharmacist outcomes. We compared 2 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities with the patient-aligned care team (PACT) Platinum Practice designation in terms of clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) access and care quality relative to national CPP averages. METHODS: All data was extracted from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and reports derived from data within the CDW. Within the fiscal year 2019-2020 timeframe, the PACT Platinum Practice facilities were assessed against a national average comparator on quality and access metrics using electronic VHA databases that capture data on patient visits with a CPP. For the evaluation of care quality, an electronic composite score of diabetes and hypertension metrics was used. Third next available appointment for the primary care provider (PCP) and CPP utilization were used as measures of access. RESULTS: Compared to national averages, the PACT Platinum Practice facilities had a higher proportion of patients meeting the evaluated quality metric across all months of the study period. For access, the mean time to the third next available primary care appointment was lower for the PACT Platinum Practice facilities compared to the national average. PACT Platinum sites had CPP utilization rates higher than national averages across the study period, and these rates remained stable. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated improved quality and access outcomes for 2 VA medical centers designated as PACT Platinum Practice sites relative to national averages. This is important because these practices have been evaluated and shown to have fidelity with the CMM practice management component. Evaluation of outcomes removing the element of practice heterogeneity allows for a more standardized comparison of outcome measures.

Implementation of a practice model for inpatient psychiatric clinical pharmacist practitioners with prescriptive authority at a veterans health care facility.

Clinical pharmacists play a valuable role on collaborative health care teams, especially in the field of mental health. However, there is a need to explore innovative practice models that optimize their potential in providing comprehensive medication management in inpatient psychiatric settings. This report aims to describe the implementation of a practice model using an inpatient psychiatric clinical pharmacist practitioner performing comprehensive medication management. The implementation of a practice model using a psychiatric clinical pharmacist practitioner was a feasible way to deliver comprehensive medication management and other clinical services in an inpatient psychiatric setting amid staffing challenges. Whereas limitations such as resource constraints must be considered, the success of this model highlights the value of a versatile psychiatric clinical pharmacist practitioner. These findings might offer insight to other health care facilities considering a similar approach to provide mental health care through the use of a psychiatric clinical pharmacist practitioner.

Comprehensive medication management (CMM): Application of a new pharmaceutical practice in onco-hematology.

The integration of a large number of drugs, such as antineoplastic agents and cancer-related supportive care drugs, into the management of cancer patients exposes them to an increased number of drug-related problems (DRP). Clinical pharmacists contribute to drug management by actively intervening in detected DRP. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of the applying a clinical pharmacist-driven comprehensive medication management (CMM) service to onco-hematology patients. This prospective interventional study was carried out over six-month duration, specifically from November 06, 2022 to April 5, 2023 in the oncology and hematology departments of the EHU Oran. The adherence to treatment was evaluated using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS). Whereas data related to the patient's general condition and medication history was assessed using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) Classification for Drug-Related Problems V9.1. Among the 130 patients included in the study, a total of 879 DRP were identified, with a mean of 6.78 (±1.72) DRP/patient, half of which were related to efficacy (51%). Almost half of our sample (44.6%) did not adhere to their treatment. The most frequent cause of DRP, accounting for (19.9%) of the cases, was the inappropriate administration by a health professional. A total of 875 pharmaceuticals interventions (PI) were proposed, 67.2% of which were focused at the drug level. The PI acceptance rate was 94.1%. The integration of CMM services in onco-hematology played an important role in optimizing dosing regimen and treatment administration methods, as well as preventing iatropathology in the management of cancer patients.

Effects of clinical interventions through a comprehensive medication management program: A retrospective study among outpatients in a private hospital.

Introduction: The intricate nature of certain diseases necessitates complex medication regimens, utilization including high-cost medications, and continual vigilance to avoid potential complications. To address these exigencies, numerous healthcare institutions have instituted multidisciplinary management teams, exemplified in pharmaceutical care through Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM) programs. These programs oversee diverse facets such as patient education, medication adherence promotion, clinical monitoring, dose adjustments, and scrutiny of prescribed drug therapies. Given the emphasized significance, it is relevant to possess evidence to continue endorsing these initiatives from management positions within health centers, and it is for this reason that this study aims to evaluate the clinical and economic benefits provided by a CMM program within a private hospital in Latin America, by analyzing the effects of clinical interventions. Methods: A retrospective examination was conducted involving documented pharmaceutical interventions in an outpatient setting from January 2019 to September 2022. To assess the interventions' repercussions, a retrospective analysis was undertaken. The collated data included patients' basic characteristics, a comprehensive pharmacist-generated description of interventions, potential associated complications, and avoided medical services. Multiple clinical projections, which were endorsed by internal medicine physicians, were developed to explore potential scenarios in the absence of pharmaceutical care. These projections were associated with conceivable complications, aligned with the most plausible circumstances. Subsequently, utilizing the average cost of healthcare within a private hospital in Latin America, the cumulative savings were quantified. These savings were then attributed to the intrinsic advantages offered by pharmaceutical care. Results: The study discloses demographic trends among patients within distinct age groups in the CMM program. Rheumatology predominated as the main referral source, and interventions centering on monitoring emerged as the pivotal drug-related concern. This encompassed a collaborative approach, involving interdisciplinary efforts toward patient education and critical parameter monitoring. Of the total 347 pharmaceutical interventions, 66.3% (N = 230) specialty office visits, 14.1% (N = 49) general practitioner consultations, 12.4% (N = 43) hospitalizations, and 7.2% (N = 25) ER visits were avoided. The economic analysis underscores cost savings ensuing from pharmaceutical interventions, amounting to a cumulative 603,792.82 USD. Extrapolating these findings to a patient cohort of 400 enrolled in the pharmaceutical care program approximates per-patient savings of 361.47 USD. Conclusion: This study reveals the significant clinical and economic benefits of CMM programs, led by multidisciplinary pharmaceutical professionals. The findings provide compelling evidence for hospital management to consider promoting such programs, drawing from the patient-centered care model in the United States applicable to Latin America.

Acceptability and consumers' willingness to pay for comprehensive medication management services in Brazil.

Aim: Comprehensive medication management (CMM) is a clinical service that aims to optimize the therapeutic results of patients at the individual level. Studies carried out in Brazil and in several parts of the world have found a positive impact of the service, mainly in the resolution of drug therapy problems and in improving clinical outcomes and patients' quality of life. This service is not widespread and its acceptability and willingness to pay were not defined by the population yet. Objective: This work aims to conduct a study with users of private health services to determine the acceptability and willingness to pay for CMM services. Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey conducted through face-to-face interviews, among residents over 18 years of age of the metropolitan region of Belo Horizonte, capital of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Results: For this study, 563 individuals were interviewed. Most respondents were female (55.1%), had completed high school (46.8%) and were employed (62.5%). The acceptability for the service was 93,25%, and among all respondents, 37 would not accept the service even if it was free. The amount of consumers' willingness to pay for the CMM service was estimated at $17.75 (40.00 BRL). Conclusion: The research results show that most people are willing to pay for the CMM service. This study can contribute to the decision-making regarding the implementation and pricing of the service in Brazil.

Polypharmacy in chronic kidney disease: Health outcomes & pharmacy-based strategies to mitigate inappropriate polypharmacy.

The rising prevalence of comorbidities in an increasingly aging population has sparked a reciprocal rise in polypharmacy. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greater burden of polypharmacy due to the comorbidities and complications associated with their disease. Polypharmacy in CKD patients has been linked to myriad direct and indirect costs for patients and the society at large. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned within the healthcare team to streamline polypharmacy management in the setting of CKD. In this article, we review the landscape of polypharmacy and examine its impacts through the lens of the ECHO model of Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes. We also present strategies for healthcare teams to improve polypharmacy care through comprehensive medication management process that includes medication reconciliation during transitions of care, medication therapy management, and deprescribing. These pharmacist-led interventions have the potential to mitigate adverse outcomes associated with polypharmacy in CKD.

Telehealth Pharmacist Approach to Comprehensive Medication Management in Post-Discharge High-Risk Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Introduction: Clinical Pharmacist-led Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM) has the potential to mitigate medication errors during transitions in care, but current evidence is underdeveloped. The objective of this work was to assess the impact of optimized CMM services through a telehealth pharmacist clinic on hospital readmission and Emergency Department (ED) utilization rates. Methods: A quality improvement study with patients discharged home from an urban, nonacademic Hospital in Westchester County, New York, receiving telehealth CMM was used. Participants included adult patients discharged home from an internal medicine unit considered high risk for preventable adverse medication errors based on comorbidities and prescribed medications. Eligible patients were offered to enroll in telehealth CMM visits with a clinical pharmacist immediately, 30 days, and 60 days post-discharge versus the current standard of care. Results: Primary outcomes included the impact on 30- and 90-day readmission and ED visit rates. Secondary outcomes included quantifying the outcomes on patient engagement, enrollment, and volume resulting from the program's process improvements. In this study, 3,060 patients were discharged from June 14, 2021, to May 10, 2022; 1,547 were eligible and offered CMM visits, and 889 completed enrollment (Treated). There was a 2.1% absolute difference in 30-day readmission rates between untreated and attempted (p = 0.07), and a 2.9% difference between the untreated and treated group (p = 0.04). Thirty-day ED utilization decreased by 1.6% between untreated and attempted (p = 0.3), and 3.5% between the untreated and treated (p = 0.03). There were four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles in this program, in which the process improvements resulted in an overall average increase in patient volume, enrollment rates, and patient engagement for this QI initiative. Conclusions: This study yielded significant reductions in readmission and ED utilization rates among treated patients, highlighting successful process improvements that improved patient engagement and the potential for enhancing care coordination in vulnerable populations.

Prescribers' approval rate of pharmacist-initiated interventions to optimise patients' clinical status of hypertension in the ambulatory care setting.

This perspective, pre- and post-intervention study with a one-year follow-up primarily aimed to ascertain prescribers' approval rate of pharmacists' interventions and clinical status of hypertension following comprehensive medication management (CMM) intervention in the ambulatory care clinic. Between January 2018 and January 2022 overall 100 patients with hypertension and other comorbidities were referred to the CMM services at the Health Centre Zagreb - Centar (HCZC). Out of 275 interventions directed to prescribers, 73.1 % of interventions were approved, 12.4 % were rejected and 14.5 % were not reviewed. The percentage of patients with a blood pressure goal increased from 45 % at the initial consultation to 82.5 % at the patients' latest encounter (p < 0.001). The average number of drug therapy problems (DTPs) per patient totaled 3.53 ± 1.80, where 98 % of patients had one or more DTPs, 48 % had 4 or more DTPs, whereas 26 % had 5 or more DTPs. Sub-therapeutic dosage (32.6 %) and the need for additional drug therapy (30.9 %) were the two most commonly identified DTPs. These results reinforce the need to integrate pharmacy-led services in the primary care setting with the aim of improving patients' health outcomes.

Integración del modelo biopsicosocial en la implantación de Comprehensive Medication Management para pacientes tratados en una institución oncológica en Colombia / Biopsychosocial Model Integration in the implementation of Comprehensive Medication Management for patients treated in an oncological institution in Colombia

Introducción: Las personas con cáncer necesitan recibir cuidados enfocados en aspectos biopsi-cosociales considerando la experiencia con la medicación (MedExp), la evolución de esta enfermedad y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CRVS). Se presentan los resultados del Compre-hensive Medication Management (CMM) implanta-do en una institución colombiana especializada en oncología. Método: Diseño cuali-cuantitativo mixto observacional, descriptivo y prospectivo. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante triangulación de técnicas cualitativas (entrevistas en profundidad y observación participante) y cuantitativas (entrevistas clínicas con cuestionarios validados). Las entrevistas fueron presenciales y telemáticas por la pandemia (febrero-octubre 2021). Según los estándares del CMM, se generó la historia farmacoterapéutica, se registró la información biopsicosocial y se analizó la MedExp y la CVRS utilizando Medicines Optimisation Software®. Resultados: Se evaluaron los estándares antes y después de su implantación. La valoración inicial tuvo un análisis DAFO (Debilidades, Amenazas, Fortalezas, Oportunidades) consensuando estrategias para desarrollar CMM. El servicio de oncología derivó 17 personas, 10 mujeres aceptaron participar. Se completaron 30 entrevistas recogiendo narrativas sobre experiencias, observaciones y datos clínicos contextualizados a partir de las que se realizaron intervenciones biopsicosociales. Se resolvieron 2 condiciones clínicas, 2 mejoraron, 7 permanecieron estables, 9 mejoraron parcialmente y 4 no tuvieron mejoría. Tras recibir CMM, las participantes mejoraron su autopercepción en salud, y mejoraron principalmente las dimensiones de movilidad, realización de actividades cotidianas y ansiedad/depresión. Conclusiones: En la implantación del CMM se integró el modelo biopsicosocial considerando las experiencias reales de padecer cáncer alcanzando mejoría en condiciones clínicas y en CVRS de las pacientes atendidas. (AU)

Introduction: People with cancer need to receive care focused on biopsychosocial aspects, consid-ering medication experience (MedExp), disease and illness progression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The results of the Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM) implemented in a Colombian institution specialized in oncology are presented. Method: Mixed observational, descriptive, and pro-spective qualitative-quantitative design. Data were obtained by triangulating qualitative (in-depth inter-views and participant observation) and quantitative techniques (clinical interviews with validated ques-tionnaires). Data was collected through interviews carried out face-to-face and remotely due to the pandemic situation during February-October 2021. According to CMM standards, the pharmacothera-peutic history was obtained, recorded, and MedExp and HRQoL were analyzed using Medicines Optimi-zation Software®. Results: The standards of pharmaceutical care practice were established through the implemen-tation of a SWOT analysis to support care process. The oncology service referred 17 people; 10 women agreed to participate. Thirty interviews were completed collecting narratives about experiences, observations and contextualized clinical data from which biopsychosocial interventions were carried out. Clinical results obtained were: 2 clinical condi-tions resolved, 2 improved, 7 stable, 9 partially im-proved and 4 unimprovement. After receiving CMM, the participants improved their self-perception of health, and HRQoL dimensions of mobility, daily activities, and anxiety/depression improved. Conclusions: Through the implementing of CMM, clinical conditions related to the patients’ medica-tions were improved. Results guided the actions to be followed when implementing this biopsychoso-cial model in the institution. Providing benefits for patients and caregivers, in terms of avoiding the deterioration of quality of life despite suffering from of oncological diseases.

Implementation of an integrated ambulatory care pharmacist collaborative care workflow model in specialty clinics in a large academic health system.

PURPOSE: Ambulatory care and specialty pharmacy practices are rapidly growing in tandem with the accelerated development of advanced therapies for complex disease states. A coordinated and standardized interprofessional team-based approach is critical to providing high-quality care to specialty patients on complex, expensive, and high-risk therapies. Yale New Haven Health System dedicated resources to the creation of a medication management clinic under a unique care model that integrates ambulatory care pharmacists within specialty clinics who coordinate with centralized specialty pharmacists. The new care model workflow encompasses ambulatory care pharmacists, specialty pharmacists, ambulatory care pharmacy technicians, specialty pharmacy liaisons, clinicians, and clinic support staff. The strategies employed to design, implement, and optimize this workflow to meet the increasing demand for pharmacy support in specialty care is discussed. SUMMARY: The workflow incorporated key activities from highly diverse existing specialty pharmacy, ambulatory care pharmacy, and specialty clinic practices. Standard processes were developed for patient identification, referral placement, visit scheduling, encounter documentation, medication fulfillment, and clinical follow-up. Resources were created or optimized to support successful implementation, including an electronic pharmacy referral, specialty collaborative practice agreements to facilitate pharmacist-led comprehensive medication management, and a standardized note template. Communication strategies were developed to facilitate feedback and process updates. Enhancements focused on eliminating documentation redundancies and delegating nonclinical tasks to a dedicated ambulatory care pharmacy technician. The workflow was implemented in 5 ambulatory rheumatology, digestive health, and infectious diseases clinics. Pharmacists utilized this workflow to complete 1,237 patient visits, serving 550 individual patients over 11 months. CONCLUSION: This initiative created a standard workflow to support an interdisciplinary standard of specialty patient care that is robust to accommodate planned expansion. This workflow implementation approach can serve as a road map for other healthcare systems with integrated specialty and ambulatory pharmacy departments undertaking similar models for specialty patient management.

DEA-registered clinical pharmacist practitioners: Progressing practice to increase patient care access.

PURPOSE: This descriptive review aims to describe the impact of controlled substance prescriptive authority (CSPA) among Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)-registered clinical pharmacist practitioners (pharmacists) within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). The practice perspectives of pharmacists with CSPA are also reviewed. A 3-part methodology included identification and query of DEA-registered pharmacists, practice impact data analysis, and time and motion prescribing analysis. SUMMARY: Between quarter 1 of fiscal year 2018 and quarter 2 of fiscal year 2022, the number of DEA-registered pharmacists in the VA grew by 314%, from 21 to 87 pharmacists. Pharmacists in pain management and mental health reported benefits of CSPA, with the most common being practice autonomy (93%), increased efficiency (92%), and reduced burden on other prescribers (89%). Initial challenges to pharmacists obtaining DEA registration included a lack of incentive (46%) and concern about increased liability (37%). A time and motion analysis demonstrated that pharmacists with CSPA saved a median of 12 minutes for prescription writing compared to those without CSPA. CONCLUSION: There is an opportunity for DEA-registered pharmacists to meet patient care needs to fill gaps in care from physician shortages, improve health equity, and provide quality healthcare for vulnerable, underserved populations, especially in areas where controlled substance prescribing is common. To fully optimize the role of the pharmacist, it is imperative that state practice acts be expanded to include pharmacist DEA authority as part of collaborative practice and that fair and equitable payment models be established for pharmacist comprehensive medication management.

Professionals' and Patients' Perspectives on Criteria for Referring Hypertensive Patients to Comprehensive Medication Management Services in Public Primary Health Care.

Patient prioritization in comprehensive medication management services allows coordinating care and guiding patients according to their clinical profile and their medication use. The aim of the study is to identify and describe factors that indicate the need for comprehensive medication management services among primary care hypertension patients within a public health system from the perspective of patients, pharmacists, nurses and physicians. A qualitative study was carried out with interviews with nurses, pharmacists and physicians (n = 20), and two focus groups with hypertensive patients (n = 12) at primary health care facilities and a public outdoor fitness area between January and February 2019 in Brazil. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the Atlas.ti® software. The data analysis revealed the following factors indicative of the need to refer hypertension patients to a pharmacist: lifestyle habits, comorbidities, health care utilization and medication use. The issues identified and the information obtained from the qualitative research and compared with literature studies reviewed allowed defining dimensions that should be considered as an aid in the selection of uncontrolled hypertensive patients for comprehensive medication management services.

Psychotropic stewardship: Advancing patient care.

Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists (BCPPs) practice in a variety of inpatient and outpatient health care settings as part of collaborative, multidisciplinary teams. The American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP) has promoted the expansion of psychiatric pharmacy through the development of psychotropic stewardship programs (PSPs). Based on the standards developed during the creation and expansion of antimicrobial stewardship programs, psychotropic stewardship promotes the safe and appropriate use of psychotropic medications. AAPP envisions every patient with a psychiatric diagnosis will have their medication treatment plan reviewed, optimized, and managed by a psychotropic stewardship team with a psychiatric pharmacist as a co-leader. Because of variations in practice site resources, patient populations, and provider collaboration, the creation and implementation of PSPs should be based on site-specific needs and opportunities. Initial patient identification could prioritize those prescribed multiple medications, high-risk psychotropics, or comorbid medical diagnoses. However, every patient prescribed a psychotropic medication should have the opportunity to work with a PSP. Incremental implementation may be required during the planning stages of stewardship teams. Use of clinical practice-related core outcomes will allow for the optimization of program resources, increased recognition, and improved patient outcomes. PSPs should be patient-focused and integrate patients' preferences and access to recommended treatment options. The eventual goal of PSP implementation is official recognition by key regulatory agencies as a standard of care for patients who receive a diagnosis of a psychiatric or substance use disorder.

Provider survey of the roles of clinical pharmacists in primary care in a Federally Qualified Health Center versus an Accountable Care Organization.

Background: Healthcare providers at primary care Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers (FQHC) and an Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) collaborated with clinical pharmacists in providing patient care utilizing the comprehensive medication management (CMM) framework. The intention of CMM was to generate more time for providers to see patients, and to improve overall patient quality of life. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to survey the providers' views of clinical pharmacy services, and to compare and contrast the shared-visit model in rural FQHCs and an ACO collaborative practice agreement model in a mid-sized metropolitan area. Methods: Primary care providers completed a five-domain 22-item survey of provider patient care, provider pharmacy consults, provider ranking of pharmacy-services, disease treatment and provider views on the value of clinical pharmacists. Results: FQHC pharmacists were available one day per week (75%), while 69% of ACO pharmacists were available five days per week. FQHC providers requested <5 pharmacist consults per week (46%), while ACO requested >10 consults per week (44%). Both organizations had nearly identical provider rankings and impact on patient care for clinical pharmacy services and disease-focused pharmacy services. The provider survey of satisfaction with pharmacy consultations were highly positive and scored as strongly agree with FQHC and ACO, with the exception of three items with the FQHC. Overall providers at both organizations report highly effective medication-related improvements, disease outcomes and also recommend clinical pharmacists to other providers and primary care teams. Regression analysis revealed relevant clinical associations between survey statements not seen with individual survey items alone. Conclusion: Primary care providers report high satisfaction with, and benefits of, clinical pharmacy services. Drug information resource and disease-focused management were documented by providers as valuable pharmacy services. Providers promoted expanding the role of clinical pharmacists with providers, and integration into primary care teams.

Defining the value of faculty primary care clinical pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Demonstrating the value of comprehensive medication management (CMM) within clinical faculty sites is a challenge when balancing patient volume with academic responsibilities. Utilizing an evidence-based implementation system for CMM, faculty primary care clinical pharmacists (PCCPs) standardized CMM within their practice sites. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this project was to define the value of faculty PCCPs. METHODS: An Ambulatory Care Summit was hosted to identify opportunities for consistency of CMM. Following the summit, the CMM implementation team (faculty PCCPs and project manager) utilized CMM implementation tools from the Comprehensive Medication Management in Primary Care Research Team. Additionally, a strategic plan was developed to enhance practice management, improve fidelity, and determine key performance indicators (KPIs). Five faculty-mentored student projects assessed value of faculty-delivered CMM in primary care clinics. Data included medication adherence metrics, clinic quality metrics, diabetes metrics, acute healthcare utilization rates, and a physician satisfaction survey. RESULTS: Among those receiving CMM, adherence improved 14% (P = 0.022), 119 clinic quality metrics were achieved, HbA1c ≤ 9% improved 45% (p < 0.001), average HbA1c decreased by 1.73% (p < 0.001), and medication preventable acute care utilization within the referral reason decreased. Over 90% of physicians surveyed agreed the faculty PCCP is a valuable team member, improved patients' health, and improved effectiveness/efficiency. Four student posters were presented at national conferences and 18 student pharmacists were engaged in various aspects of the project. CONCLUSION: Incorporating CMM at faculty primary care clinics provides value. To demonstrate this value, faculty must align KPIs with institution-specific payer contracts.

Case report: Serotoninergic and cholinergic syndromes induced by self-medication.

Self-medication is a part of the self-care practices carried out by the elderly in their environment. The aim of this case report is to show how the self-medication of fluoxetine and dimenhydrinate in an older adult can induce serotoninergic and cholinergic syndromes, showing symptoms such as nausea, tachycardia, tremor, loss of appetite, memory loss, decreased vision, falls, and increased urination. An older adult who has been diagnosed with arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and a recent diagnosis of essential thrombosis is the subject of this case report. After the analysis of the case, cessation of fluoxetine was recommended to avoid withdrawal symptoms, therefore decreasing the need for dimenhydrinate and the medicines used for dyspepsia. After the recommendation, the patient showed an improvement in the symptoms. Finally, the comprehensive evaluation process of the medication in the Medicines Optimization Unit achieved the detection of the problem and improved the patient's health condition.

Assessing the impact of a payor-funded embedded clinical pharmacist on patient and provider satisfaction in a private primary care practice.

PURPOSE: With expanding roles of clinic-embedded pharmacists comes the need to identify routes for optimization, soliciting and addressing feedback, and justifying the position(s) to the employing institution. Studies have demonstrated the benefit of integrating pharmacists into healthcare teams, but these opportunities remain largely limited to major health systems due to a lack of billing avenues for and familiarity with the services pharmacists can provide. METHODS: With funding from and partnership with a third-party payor, a pharmacist was incorporated into a private physician-owned clinic to be a resource to the providers and provide comprehensive medication management to patients. Patient and provider experiences were assessed by survey and interview, respectively, utilizing both Likert-scale and free-response questions. The responses were coded, analyzed, and aggregated into themes. The demographic and Likert-scale responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the pharmacist's service, indicating that they felt more comfortable managing their medications and that they would recommend the pharmacist to a family member or friend. Provider satisfaction was also high, with providers stating that they found the recommendations by the pharmacist helpful, that the recommendations improved cardiovascular risk factors in their patients with diabetes, and that, overall, they were satisfied with the care provided by the pharmacist. The primary concern from the providers was a lack of understanding regarding how best to reach and utilize the service. CONCLUSION: Overall, an embedded clinical pharmacist providing comprehensive medication management at a private primary care clinic had a positive impact on both provider and patient satisfaction.

Comprehensive Medication Management Services with a Holistic Point of View, a Scoping Review.

Implementing Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM) services uncovered the importance of the totality of the patient's perspective in this process. The holistic approach takes into account the physical, mental and emotional well-being of individuals, as well as their socioeconomic circumstances. The aim of this study was to characterize the scientific evidence associated with CMM services that included this holistic approach. A scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O'Malley's method. Searches were performed in Google Scholar for papers published between 2010 and 2020 in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Study design, health contexts, sample of patients, results obtained, barriers and facilitators, and the integration of a holistic approach were determined. Two hundred and eighteen papers were evaluated, most of which focused on the implementation of this service through prospective observational studies. A minority of studies reported on a holistic approach, a smaller number examined the effect of social determinants of health, the patient's medication experiences and the pharmacotherapy outcomes from the patient's perspective. Despite the progress achieved, most of the referents do not yet reflect a broader view of the patient's life situation and its relationship to pharmacotherapy and the ways in which the pharmacist implements holistic elements to solve or prevent drug-related problems.

Delivery of Comprehensive Medication Management and Other Clinical Services via Telehealth by Pharmacy Type.

BACKGROUND: The recent coronavirus pandemic accelerated the need to deliver pharmacy-related services remotely. OBJECTIVE: To describe experiences with providing comprehensive medication management (CMM) and other clinical services via telehealth by pharmacy type, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An online survey of pharmacists, representing 27 pharmacies, was conducted to capture telehealth usage in three pharmacy types: independently owned, integrated into a clinical setting, and retail chain. A sub-analysis was performed to assess if providing CMM services via telehealth helped, resulted in no change, or worsened the care of different patient groups (e.g., those with diabetes, were low-income, aged 65+ years). RESULTS: During the pandemic, telehealth usage among independently owned pharmacies and those integrated into a clinical setting increased, but no change occurred among retail chain pharmacies. This usage increase in the first two pharmacy types occurred despite limited investments in connectivity-related resources to support telehealth services. Pharmacists from both independently owned pharmacies (63%) and those integrated into a clinical setting (89%) reported CMM via telehealth reached patients they would not otherwise have been able to reach during the pandemic. Most pharmacists/pharmacies found telehealth to be a feasible and acceptable method of delivering CMM. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists and pharmacies are now experienced with and have interest in continuing CMM via telehealth, even as the pandemic recedes. However, investments in telecommunications resources, training support, technical assistance, and continued telehealth reimbursement from health plans are needed to sustain this service delivery model.