Intravitreal Injection of Conbercept Combined with Dexamethasone for Macular Edema Following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Background: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injections of Conbercept combined with dexamethasone (DEX) for macular edema (ME) following central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods: This was a prospective, single-masked, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Patients with ME following CRVO were randomised into groups to receive intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg Conbercept plus 0.2 mg DEX or 0.5 mg Conbercept alone on day 0 followed by repeat injections as indicated. The primary outcome measure was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12. Secondary outcome measures included decrease in central retinal thickness (CRT), injection frequency and interval and percentage of patients who gained more than 15 ETDRS letters or achieved a CRT of < 250 µm at month 12. Results: 33 males (51%) and 32 females (49%) were initially recruited with an average age of 56.64 ± 13.88 years. Patients in the Conbercept and Conbercept + DEX groups gained an average of 14.55 ± 19.19 and 14.88 ± 17.68 ETDRS letters, respectively, at months 12 (t = 4.221, P = 0.000; and t = 4.834, P = 0.000) with no significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.071, P = 0.943). In the Conbercept group, the mean reduction in CRT from baseline to month 12 was 435.26 ± 293.37 µm (t = 8.261, P = 0.000) compared to 431.36 ± 294.55 (t = 8.413, P = 0.000) in the Conbercept + DEX group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.053, P = 0.958). The Conbercept + DEX group received fewer intravitreal injections. No major complications occurred. Conclusion: Conbercept, alone or with DEX, can improve BCVA and reduce CRT in ME following CRVO without serious adverse events. The treatment interval was longer in the Conbercept + DEX group. Trial Registration: The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 5 July 2017. (http://www.chictr.org.cn, 05/07/2017 Registration Number: ChiCTR-INR-17011877).

Intravitreal conbercept injection with panretinal photocoagulation for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy with vitreous hemorrhage.

AIM: To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of combining panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) with intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injections for patients with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR) complicated by mild or moderate vitreous hemorrhage (VH), with or without diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with VH with/without DME secondary to HR-PDR and received PRP combined with IVC injections were recruited in this retrospective study. Upon establishing the patient's diagnosis, an initial IVC was performed, followed by prompt administration of PRP. In cases who significant bleeding persisted and impeded the laser operation, IVC was sustained before supplementing with PRP. Following the completion of PRP, patients were meticulously monitored for a minimum of six months. Laser therapy and IVC injections were judiciously adjusted based on fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) results. Therapeutic effect and the incidence of adverse events were observed. RESULTS: Out of 42 patients (74 eyes), 29 were male and 13 were female, with a mean age of 59.17±12.74y (33-84y). The diabetic history was between 1wk and 26y, and the interval between the onset of visual symptoms and diagnosis of HR-PDR was 1wk-1y. The affected eye received 2.59±1.87 (1-10) IVC injections and underwent 5.5±1.02 (4-8) sessions of PRP. Of these, 68 eyes received PRP following 1 IVC injection, 5 eyes after 2 IVC injections, and 1 eye after 3 IVC injections. Complete absorption of VH was observed in all 74 eyes 5-50wk after initial treatment, with resolution of DME in 51 eyes 3-48wk after initial treatment. A newly developed epiretinal membrane was noted in one eye. Visual acuity significantly improved in 25 eyes. No complications such as glaucoma, retinal detachment, or endophthalmitis were reported. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the combination of PRP with IVC injections is an effective and safe modality for treating diabetic VH in patients with HR-PDR.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of conbercept for moderate to severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) in treating moderate to severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), with or without accompanying diabetic macular edema. Methods: In this longitudinal retrospective study, 35 patients (50 eyes) with moderate to severe NPDR and Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores between 43 and 53 were treated at the Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, from October 2018 to January 2023. Treatment protocol included three monthly IVC injections followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen over a two-year follow-up period. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, central macular thickness (CMT), extent of hard exudate (HE), and changes in DRSS scores. DRSS scores before and after treatment were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Both systemic and ocular adverse events were meticulously documented to ascertain safety. Results: From baseline to the final follow-up, the mean BCVA improved from 0.41 ± 0.39 to 0.23 ± 0.20 logMAR (p<0.05). The mean CMT decreased from 306.22 ± 77.40 to 297.97 ± 88.15 µm (p = 0.385). At 24 months, DRSS scores improved by ≥1 stage in 40 eyes (80%), ≥ 2 stages in 28 eyes (56%), ≥3 stages in 10 eyes (20%), and remained stable in 6 eyes (12%). The DRSS scores at each follow-up interval demonstrated statistically significant improvement from baseline (p<0.05). In 15 of 27 eyes (55.56%) with diabetic macular edema (DME), there was a significant reduction in the mean area of HE from baseline (p<0.05). No serious systemic adverse events were observed. Conclusion: IVC is an effective and safe treatment for moderate to severe NPDR, demonstrating significant improvements in DRSS scores.

Prognostic factors for intravitreal conbercept in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors influencing visual outcomes in patients with pathological myopia-associated choroidal neovascularization (PM-CNV) following intravitreal injections of conbercept. METHODS: A total of 86 eyes from 86 patients received intravitreal conbercept in a 1 + PRN regimen. After the initial injection, patients were followed for 12 months. They were categorized into two groups based on their 12-month visual acuity change: those who achieved greater than a one-line improvement in BCVA (improved group; n = 65) and those who experienced a one-line or lesser improvement or a decrease in BCVA (non-improved group; n = 21). RESULTS: Over the 12-month period, the mean BCVA in the improved group significantly improved from 0.82 to 0.41 LogMAR. In the non-improved group, BCVA changed from 1.24 to 1.09 LogMAR. Similarly, the mean CRT decreased from 426.21 µm at baseline to 251.56 µm at 12 months in the improved group, and from 452.47 to 382.45 µm in the non-improved group. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that older age (OR 1.287; 95% CI 1.019-1.625; P = 0.034), poorer baseline BCVA (OR 6.422; 95% CI 1.625-25.384; P = 0.008), the presence of subfoveal CNV (OR 4.817; 95% CI 1.242-18.681; P = 0.023), and organized interlacing patterns of CNV morphology (OR 5.593; 95% CI 1.397-22.392; P = 0.015) emerged as independent risk factors correlated with worsened visual prognosis following intravitreal conbercept injections. CONCLUSIONS: Conbercept demonstrates significant efficacy and safety in treating PM-CNV. Key factors influencing visual recovery post-treatment include older age, poorer baseline BCVA, the presence of subfoveal CNV, and organized interlacing patterns of CNV morphology.

Comparative study on the efficacy of Conbercept and Aflibercept in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

This study compares the effectiveness of Conbercept and Aflibercept in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University's Ophthalmology Department (May 2020-May 2023), this prospective study enrolled 159 nAMD patients. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving 0.5 mg Conbercept and the other 2 mg Aflibercept intravitreal injections. Over 12 months, the study, employing a Treat-and-Extend (T&E) regimen, assessed Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) changes and injection frequency. Of the 159 patients, 137 (149 eyes) completed the study. No significant age difference was found between the groups (P = 0.331). After 12 months, BCVA improved similarly in both groups (Conbercept: 52.8 ± 18.9, Aflibercept: 52.0 ± 19.7 letters; P = 0.820). CRT reduction was also comparable (Conbercept: 246.3 ± 82.8 µm, Aflibercept: 275.9 ± 114.3 µm; P = 0.079). Injection frequencies averaged 6.9 ± 0.7 (Conbercept) and 6.7 ± 0.7 (Aflibercept; P = 0.255). Subtype analysis revealed Type 1 MNV had higher baseline BCVA and lower CRT, with more frequent injections compared to other types. Both Conbercept and Aflibercept are clinically similar in efficacy for nAMD, with the T&E regimen proving therapeutically effective and potentially reducing patient costs. Anti-VEGF treatment efficacy varies across nAMD subtypes, indicating a potential benefit in tailored treatments for specific subtypes.Clinical trial registration number NCT05539235 (Protocol Registration and Results System).

Clinical effects of atorvastatin combined with conbercept in the treatment of patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and carotid plaque: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have been widely used in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO); however, recurrence is a major concern. This study aims to observe the clinical effects of atorvastatin and intravitreal therapy in the treatment of patients with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent carotid plaques (CP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Sixty-four patients diagnosed with branch or central RVO-ME and coexistent CP will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the control and experimental groups. The control group will be treated with intravitreal conbercept monthly for 3 months, followed by monthly evaluation and injection of pro re nata (PRN) for 12 months, while the experimental group will be treated with oral atorvastatin 20 mg daily combined with the control group treatment. If a drop of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is more than five Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (one line) or an increment in central subfield thickness (CSFT) of 100 µm (or a 10% increment from the previous visit), intravitreal re-treatment will be performed. Outcome measurements include CSFT, BCVA, number of injections, and incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow-up period. Differences between groups will be evaluated using Student's t-test, and comparisons between groups will be evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China (approval number 2023KY0418-12, dated 18 April 2023), and has been registered on chictr.org.cn. Written informed consent will be collected from each patient and the results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300071359. Registered on 12 May 2023.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections of conbercept for the treatment of idiopathic choroidal neovascularization.

BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravitreally injected conbercept, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor fusion protein, for the treatment of idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (ICNV). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed outcomes in 40 patients (40 eyes) with ICNV who received intravitreal injections of conbercept 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) and were followed up for at least 12 months. All patients underwent full ophthalmic examinations, including best-corrected vision acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp examination, color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography angiography, multifocal electroretinogram, and fundus fluorescence angiography, if necessary, at baseline and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. BCVA, macular central retinal thickness (CRT), IOP, CNV blood flow area, thickness of the CNV-pigment epithelial detachment complex, thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and the first positive peak (P1) amplitude density in ring 1 before and after treatment were compared. RESULTS: Mean baseline BCVA (logMAR), CRT, CNV blood flow area, and CNV-pigment epithelial detachment complex thickness were significantly lower 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after than before conbercept treatment (P < 0.05 each). IOP and baseline RNFL thickness were unaffected by conbercept treatment. P1 amplitude density was significantly higher 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after than before conbercept treatment (P < 0.05 each). None of the 40 eyes showed obvious ocular adverse reactions, such as endophthalmitis, glaucoma, cataract progression, and retinal detachment, and none of the patients experienced systemic adverse events, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of conbercept is beneficial to eyes with ICNV, inducing the recovery of macular structure and function and improving BCVA, while not damaging the neuroretina. Intravitreal conbercept is safe and effective for the treatment of ICNV.

Intravitreal injection of conbercept for diabetic macular edema complicated with diabetic nephropathy.

AIM: To observe the therapeutic effect of conbercept on diabetic macular edema (DME) complicated with diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 54 patients (54 eyes) that diagnosed as DME from January 2017 to October 2021 were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: DME patients with DN (25 eyes), and DME patients without DN (29 eyes). General conditions were collected before treatment, laboratory tests include fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, microalbumin/creatinine, serum creatinine. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to check the ellipsoidal zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM) integrity. Central macular thickness (CMT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and retinal hyperreflective foci (HF) as well as numbers of injections were recorded. RESULTS: There were significant differences between fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, serum creatinine, urinary microalbumin/creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the two groups (all P<0.05). EZ and ELM continuity in the DME+DN group was worse than that in the DME group (P<0.05). BCVA (logMAR) in the DME group was significantly better than that in the DME+DN group at the same time points during treatment (all P<0.05). CMT and HF values were significantly higher in the DME+DN group than that in the DME group at the all time points (all P<0.05) and significantly decreased in both groups with time during treatment. At 6mo after treatment, the mean number of injections in the DME+DN and DME group was 4.84±0.94 and 3.79±0.86, respectively. CONCLUSION: Conbercept has a significant effect in short-term treatment of DME patients with or without DN, and can significantly ameliorate BCVA, CMT and the number of HF, treatment efficacy of DME patients without DN is better than that of DME patients with DN.

Topical Ophthalmic Liposomes Dual-Modified with Penetratin and Hyaluronic Acid for the Noninvasive Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Introduction: Since intrinsic ocular barrier limits the intraocular penetration of therapeutic protein through eye drops, repeated intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are the standard therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), which are highly invasive and may cause particular ocular complications, leading to poor patient compliance. Methods: Using Penetratin (Pen) as the ocular penetration enhancer and hyaluronic acid (HA) as the retina-targeting ligand, a dual-modified ophthalmic liposome (Penetratin hyaluronic acid-liposome/Conbercept, PenHA-Lip/Conb) eye drop was designed to non-invasively penetrate the ocular barrier and deliver anti-VEGF therapeutic agents to the targeted intraocular tissue. Results: PenHA-Lip effectively penetrates the ocular barrier and targets the retinal pigment epithelium via corneal and non-corneal pathways. After a single topical administration of conbercept-loaded PenHA-Lip (PenHA-Lip/Conb), the intraocular concentration of conbercept peaked at 18.74 ± 1.09 ng/mL at 4 h, which is 11.55-fold higher than unmodified conbercept. In a laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) mouse model, PenHA-Lip/Conb eye drops three times daily for seven days inhibited CNV formation and progression without any significant tissue toxicity and achieved an equivalent effect to a single intravitreal conbercept injection. Conclusion: PenHA-Lip efficiently and safely delivered conbercept to the posterior eye segment and may be a promising noninvasive therapeutic option for nAMD.

Topical Application of Cell-Penetrating Peptide Modified Anti-VEGF Drug Alleviated Choroidal Neovascularization in Mice.

Background: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) stands as the foremost cause of irreversible central vision impairment, marked by choroidal neovascularization (CNV). The prevailing clinical approach to AMD treatment relies on intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs. However, this method is encumbered by diverse complications, prompting exploration of non-invasive alternatives such as ocular administration via eye drops for anti-VEGF therapy. Methods: Two complexes, 5-FITC-CPP-Ranibizumab (5-FCR) and 5-FITC-CPP-Conbercept (5-FCC), were synthesized by incorporating the anti-VEGF drugs Ranibizumab (RBZ) or Conbercept (CBC) with cell-penetrating peptide (CPP). Circular dichroism spectrum (CD) facilitated complexes characterization. Eye drops was utilized to address laser-induced CNV in mice. Fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) observe the CNV lesion, while FITC-dextran and IB4 dual fluorescent staining, along with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, assessed in lesion size. Tissue immunofluorescence examined CD31 and VEGF expression in choroidal/retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tissues. Biocompatibility and biosafety of 5-FCR and 5-FCC was evaluated through histological examination of various organs or cell experiments. Results: Both 5-FCR and 5-FCC exhibited favorable biocompatibility and safety profiles. VEGF-induced migration of Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) significantly decreased post-5-FCR/5-FCC treatment. Additionally, both complexes suppressed VEGF-induced tube formation in HUVECs. FFA results revealed a significant improvement in retinal exudation in mice. Histological examination unveiled the lesion areas in the 5-FCR and 5-FCC groups showed a significant reduction compared to the control group. Similar outcomes were observed in histological sections of the RPE-choroid-sclera flat mounts. Conclusion: In this study, utilizing the properties of CPP and two anti-VEGF drugs, we successfully synthesized two complexes, 5-FCR and 5-FCC, through a straightforward approach. Effectively delivering the anti-VEGF drugs to the target area in a non-invasive manner, suppressing the progression of laser-induced CNV. This offers a novel approach for the treatment of wet AMD.

Comparison of intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab versus Conbercept in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(IVR)and intravitreal injection of conbercept(IVC)in children with retinopathy of prematurity(ROP).METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 1 100 eyes with ROP treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF at our hospital from January 2015 to June 2023 were included. According to the different therapeutic drugs, the children were divided into two groups: IVR group and IVC group. According to the degree of ROP, the patients were divided into three groups: aggressive ROP(A-ROP), Zone Ⅰ type 1 ROP and Zone Ⅱ type 1 ROP. The reactivation and retreatment between the two groups were compared after propensity score matching(PSM)analysis, and they were followed-up for at least 3 mo after surgery.RESULTS: In Zone Ⅱ type 1 ROP, there was a statistically significant difference in the rates of reactivation and retreatment between the IVR and IVC groups(P&#x003C;0.05); however, in A-ROP and Zone I type 1 ROP, there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of reactivation and retreatment between the two groups(P&#x003E;0.05). The risk of reactivation and retreatment of Zone I type 1 ROP was higher than the Zone II type 1 ROP. Furthermore, the use of drugs and corrected gestational age of first treatment were influencing factors of lesion recurrence and retreatment.CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in the initial cure effect between the two drugs in Zone II type 1 ROP, with the reactivation and retreatment rates of the IVC group being much lower than those of the IVR group.

Mongolian medicine Mingmu-11 Pills combined with Conbercept in the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Mongolian medicine Mingmu-11 Pills combined with conbercept in the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration(wARMD).METHODS: Prospective study. All cases in this study were wARMD patients(72 cases, 72 eyes)admitted to the Ophthalmology Department of Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia University from November 2020 to December 2021. They were randomly divided into a combined treatment group and a control group, each with 36 eyes, and the control group received intravitreal injection of conbercept 0.05 mL for 3 consecutive months. The combined treatment group was given Mingmu-11 Pills twice a day after surgery, with 3 wk as a course of treatment, a total of 3 courses, and the control group was not given Mongolian medicine treatment. The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), changes in central macular thickness(CMT)in the macular area, and changes in N1, P1 wave amplitude density and latency were observed after treatment in both groups.RESULTS:The BCVA(letter number)of the two groups were improved(P&#x003C;0.05), and the CMT were decreased(P&#x003C;0.05). The improvement of BCVA(letter number)in the combined treatment group was better than that in the control group at 3 mo(17.42±3.29 vs 14.61±3.14, P&#x003C;0.001)and 5 mo(19.75±3.25 vs 16.81±2.77, P&#x003C;0.001)after treatment; compared with the control group, CMT of the combined treatment group was thinner than that of the control group at 3 mo(304.58±53.34 vs 351.94±52.99 μm, P&#x003C;0.001)and 5 mo(274.17±62.26 vs 321.78±63.22 μm, P&#x003C;0.05)after treatment. The amplitude density of N1 and P1 wave in mfERG in both groups at 3 mo after treatment was higher than that before treatment(P&#x003C;0.05), and r1-r3 latency of P1 wave was shorter than that before treatment(P&#x003C;0.05), with no differences in the r1-r3 latency of N1 wave(P&#x003E;0.05). In addition, the amplitude density of N1 and P1 wave in the combined treatment group was higher than that in the control group at 3 mo after treatment(P&#x003C;0.05), the latency of P1 wave in the treatment group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P&#x003C;0.05), and there was no significant difference in the latency of N1 wave between the two groups(P&#x003E;0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Mingmu-11 Pills combined with intravitreal injection of conbercept in the treatment of wARMD has obvious efficacy in improving vision and reducing macular edema.

Different approaches for treating myopic choroidal neovascularization: a network Meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and laser treatment (LT) for anatomical and functional improvement in myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) patients. METHODS: Two researchers independently searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other databases to screen studies comparing best-corrected vision acuity (BCVA) and foveal center thickness (FCT) changes after mCNV treatment. Post-treatment chorioretinal atrophy (CRA) is a secondary outcome indicator. The retrieval time limit is from the database construction to January 30, 2023. RESULTS: A total of 1072 eyes in 16 articles were included. In the RCTs, intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) were superior to PDT (MD=0.18, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.40, MD=0.18, 95%CI: 0.01, 0.42) in improving BCVA of mCNV patients (P<0.05). The relative effectiveness in improving BCVA, from high to low, appeared to be IVR, intravitreal aflibercept (IVA), IVB, LT, PDT, and sham first followed by IVA (Sham/IVA). While improving the FCT from high to low was IVA, IVR, IVB, PDT. In retrospective studies, the results of BCVA after long-term treatment showed that all the therapeutic effects from high to low was IVA, intravitreal conbercept (IVC), IVR, IVB, IVB/IVR, PDT with IVB/IVR, PDT. The effect of improving FCT was IVA, IVR, IVC, PDT, and IVB from high to low. And in the effects of improving CRA, the IVB appeared to be higher than IVR, while the PDT was the smallest, but none of the differences in the results were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF has the best effect on long-term vision improvement in mCNV patients, using IVB or IVR alone to treat mCNV may be better than IVB or IVR combined with PDT. There is no significant difference in the improvement of visual acuity, macular edema, and CRA in mCNV patients treated with any different anti-VEGF drugs.

Optical coherence tomography angiography for macular microvessels in ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion treated with conbercept: predictive factors for the prognosis.

AIM: To evaluate the predicative factors of visual prognosis using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) patients with macular edema (ME) after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, data from 60 patients (60 eyes) with a definite diagnosis of ischemic BRVO with ME by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were studied. The eyes with ME according to spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) underwent intravitreal conbercept (IVC) and 3+pro re nata (PRN) regimen. The injection times were recorded. Two weeks after injection, fundus laser photocoagulation was performed in the non-perfusion area of the retina. The patients were followed up once a month for 6mo. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal avascular zone (FAZ), and A-circularity index (AI), at 6mo and the baseline were compared. RESULTS: All patients showed significant improvement in BCVA from 0.82±0.32 to 0.39±0.11 logMAR (P<0.001). The mean central macular thickness (CMT) significantly decreased from 476.22±163.54 to 298.66±109.23 µm. Both the FAZ area and AI at 6mo were significantly higher than those at the baseline: the FAZ area increased (0.38±0.02 vs 0.39±0.02 mm2, P<0.05); the AI increased (1.27±0.02 vs 1.31±0.01, P=0.000). The baseline BCVA showed a significantly positive correlation with the baseline FAZ area, FAZ perimeter (PERIM) and AI, final visual gain (FVG) and injection times, respectively (P<0.001). FVG showed a significantly negative correlation with the FAZ area, PERIM, AI and injection times, but a significantly positive correlation with vessel densities (VDs) 300 µm area around FAZ (FD-300; P<0.001). Injection times was positively correlated with the baseline FAZ area, and AI, but inversely correlated with the baseline FD-300 (P<0.001). However macular ischemia was noted in 5 cases during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Using OCTA to observe macular ischemia and quantify parameters can better predict the final visual prognosis of patients before treatment. The changes in FAZ parameters may influence the visual prognosis and injection times.

Treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization: a network meta-analysis and review.

PURPOSE: This is, to our knowledge, the first network meta-analysis aiming to compare all treatment modalities for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS: After the electronic databases were searched, two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, full-texts, and extracted information. Primary endpoints were change in visual outcome and central retinal thickness. We used a network meta-analysis to compare treatment outcomes in the early (≤ 6 months) and late (> 6 months) phase. RESULTS: We included 34 studies (2,098 eyes) in our network meta-analysis. In the early phase, the use of anti-VEGF led to a gain of 14.1 letters (95% CI, 10.8-17.4) compared to untreated patients (p < 0.0001), 12.1 letters (95% CI, 8.3-15.8) to photodynamic therapy (PDT) (p < 0.0001), 7.5 (95% CI, 1.2-13.8) letters to intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) (p = 0.019), and - 2.9 letters (95% CI, - 6.0-0.2) to the combination of anti-VEGF and PDT (p = 0.065). In the later phase, these results were largely maintained. There were no significant differences in visual outcomes between patients treated with 1 + PRN and 3 + PRN. However, the 1 + PRN group received 1.8 (SD 1.3), while the 3 + PRN group received 3.2 (SD 0.9) injections within 12 months (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis confirms that anti-VEGF is the most effective treatment for myopic CNV using the 1 + PRN treatment strategy.

Safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept for the treatment of patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia: Results from the SHINY study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg conbercept in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia (pmCNV). METHODS: The 177 pmCNV patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive conbercept or sham injection, respectively. The conbercept group receive conbercept intravitreal injections administered on a pro re nata (PRN) basis after 3 monthly loading doses. The sham group received three consecutive monthly sham injections and then one conbercept injection followed by PRN conbercept intravitreal injections. RESULTS: At month 3, the mean BCVA for the two groups were improved by 12.0 letters (conbercept group, from 54.05 letters to 66.05 letters) and 0.6 letters (sham group, from 49.77 letters to 50.33 letters), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) at month 3 in the two groups decreased 62.0 µm (conbercept group, from 348.90 µm to 286.18 µm) and 4.4 µm (sham group, from 347.86 µm to 343.47 µm) (p < 0.001). At month 9, the mean BCVA improved by 13.3 letters in the conbercept group and 11.3 letters in the sham group. The mean CRT decreased 73.6 µm in the conbercept group and 55.9 µm in the sham group (p < 0.001). The most common ocular adverse events were associated with intravitreal injections, such as conjunctival haemorrhage and increased intraocular pressure. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg conbercept provided improvement in visual and anatomical outcomes in pmCNV patients with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events.

Panretinal photocoagulation plus intravitreal conbercept for diabetic retinopathy in real world: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) plus intravitreal conbercept (IVC) for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in real world and explore risk factors for patients with poor reactivity and presence of vision-threatening complications after combination treatment. METHODS: Retrospective review of DR patients received PRP plus IVC over 6 months. The main outcome was improvement ≥ 2 steps in ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) levels. Different strategies for eyes receiving IVC within or over 1 month after PRP were analyzed. For patients with DRSS improvement < 2 steps and presence of vision-threatening adverse events, a binary logistic regression method was used to select risk factors. RESULTS: Sixty one eyes were involved in this study. After treated with combination therapy with a median number of 3 injections, 44% of eyes improved ≥ 2 steps in DRSS levels. A total of 14 eyes (23%) occurred vision-threatening adverse events. No significant difference was found in eyes receiving conbercept within or over 1 month after PRP. Duration of diabetes (OR 0.849, 95%CI 0.734-0.982, P = 0.027), GFR (OR 0.961, 95%CI 0.933-0.990, P = 0.010) and baseline DRSS levels (OR 3.290, 95%CI 1.483-7.295, P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for DRSS improvement < 2 steps after treatment. Occurrence of vision-threatening complications was only related to high DRSS levels (OR 3.668, 95%CI 1.710-7.868, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy was effective for most patients with DR in real world. Eyes received PRP combined with earlier or later conbercept was demonstrated no significant difference for outcomes. For patients with poor renal function, high DRSS levels or occurred DR at the early stage of diabetes, follow-up should be strengthened.

The efficacy and ocular safety following aflibercept, conbercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and laser for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is typically treated with laser photocoagulation and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). To the best of our knowledge, most systematic reviews have focused on comparing anti-VEGF against laser treatment while comparisons between different anti-VEGF agents are lacking. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents or laser after primary ROP therapy. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases up to November 2022. We included studies that used anti-VEGF or laser for ROP with comparable cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 44 studies were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing anti-VGEF with laser, we found that the anti-VEGF group had a significantly higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.56, 95%CI = [1.06, 2.31], p = 0.03), a longer time from treatment to retreatment (WMD = 5.99 weeks, 95%CI = [4.03, 7.95], p < 0.001), a lower retinal detachment rate (RR = 0.55, 95%CI = [0.30, 0.91], p = 0.02), higher spherical equivalent (WMD = 1.69D, 95%CI = [0.61, 2.77], p = 0.002), lower myopia rate (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = [0.50, 0.97], p = 0.03) and lower anisometropia rate (RR = 0.44, 95%CI = [0.29, 0.67], p = 0.0001). In comparisons between ranibizumab and bevacizumab, the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group was associated with higher recurrence rate (RR = 2.02, 95%CI = [1.49, 2.73], p < 0.0001), higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.70, 95%CI = [1.17, 2.47], p = 0.0006), and lower high myopia rate (RR = 0.31, 95%CI = [0.12, 0.77], p = 0.01). Similarly, when compared to aflibercept and conbercept, the IVR cohort also demonstrated higher recurrence and retreatment rates. While no significant differences were observed in any of the variables included in the statistical analysis in the comparison between bevacizumab and aflibercept. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF was associated with higher retreatment and lesser incidence of myopia as compared to laser. Laser therapy was linked to more complications like retinal detachment and myopia. Ranibizumab exhibited higher recurrence and retreatment rates compared to bevacizumab, aflibercept, and conbercept.

Clinical efficacy and changes of serum VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and PLGF after conbercept treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and systemic safety profile of conbercept in clinical practice on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-B, and placental growth factor (PLGF) levels after intravitreal injections for the neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Thirty-five patients (35 eyes) with neovascular AMD received intravitreal injections of conbercept treatment with pro re nata protocol. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were detected before the intravitreal injection and at 1, 3, and 12mo after conbercept treatment. The levels of serum VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and PLGF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before the injection and 1 and 12mo after conbercept treatments. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean BCVA score was 39.89±14.64 letters. The mean BCVA scores were 51.03±15.78, 56.71±14.38, and 52.49±10.16 letters at 1, 3, and 12mo after conbercept treatment, and the BCVA improvements were all significant, respectively (P<0.05). At baseline, the mean CRT was 436.7±141.9 µm. At 1, 3, and 12mo after conbercept treatment, the mean CRT values were 335.1±147.8, 301.1±116.5, and 312.2±98.22 µm, and the CRT improvements were all significant, respectively (P<0.05). At baseline, 1 and 12mo after conbercept treatment, the mean levels of serum VEGF-A were 1013.8±454.3, 953.1±426.4, and 981.5±471.7 pg/mL, the mean levels of serum VEGF-B were 46.93±24.76, 42.99±19.16, and 45.32±18.76 pg/mL, the mean levels of serum PLGF at these points were 251.7±154.9, 241.3±166.7, and 245.6±147.2 pg/mL, respectively. Compared with the baseline, the levels of serum VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and PLGF did not significantly change at 1 and 12mo after conbercept treatment, respectively (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Conbercept intravitreal injection leads to BCVA and CRT improvement, however, it does not significantly affect systemic serum VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and PLGF levels at 1 and 12mo after intravitreal injection treating neovascular AMD.

Clinical efficacy of conbercept injection on neovascular age-related macular degeneration under different levels of inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is considered one of the most common causes of irreversible blindness among elderly patients. Neovascular AMD, which accounts for 10% of all AMD cases, can cause devastating vision loss due to choroidal neovascularization (CNV). The clinical effects and safety of intravitreal injection of conbercept in patients suffering from neovascular AMD have not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of conbercept in patients with neovascular AMD with different levels of inflammation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients with neovascular AMD who underwent intravitreal injection of conbercept (3 injections per month + pro re nata (3 + PRN)) were included and stratified based on the intraocular level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The level of inflammation was defined as low, medium or high, based on the concentration of hs-CRP prior to injection. Before and after conbercept injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were compared, respectively. Moreover, cytokine markers as well as the frequency of injections and adverse events (AEs) were measured. RESULTS: There were significant differences in BCVA and CRT between low, medium and high tertiles. Compared to the baseline, improved BCVA was observed, and CRT declined significantly after operation. Adverse events were most observed in high tertiles. A significant decrease in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 was observed after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of conbercept on neovascular AMD varies depending on the level of inflammation, which could be achieved by administering different injection frequencies at different levels of inflammation. Furthermore, conbercept is associated with the reduction of inflammatory factor (IL-6 and IL-8) levels after intravitreal injection, which suggests that suppressing inflammatory response might contribute to the clinical efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment. Our results provide a novel mechanism for conbercept in patients with neovascular AMD.