Comparison of different treatment approaches for coronoid process fracture in terrible triad injury: a multicenter, randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the functional results of different treatment approaches for the fracture of the coronoid process in terrible triad injury (TTI). METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial included participants from seven level-1 trauma centres in China. All patients were randomly assigned to three groups, wherein different approaches were applied to treat coronoid fracture: group A) internal fixation of the coronoid process without external fixation or splint (ORIF group), B) external fixation using a hinged fixator without internal fixation (Exfix group), and C) long-arm plaster for two to three weeks postoperatively without internal fixation of coronoid process (Plaster group). Early active motion exercises within the limits of pain were started immediately after surgery under the supervision of a physical therapist. Outcomes were evaluated at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (22 patients in Group A, 21 in Group B, and 22 in Group C) were included in this trial from January 2016 to January 2019. The average arc of elbow motion was 114.1° ± 8.92°. The average flexion and flexion contracture were 126.4° ± 11.2° and 12.3° ± 7.7°, respectively. The arcs of forearm rotation of the elbow for each group were 145.41° ± 9.36°, 143.38° ± 9.79°, and 143.86° ± 10.95°, respectively. The MEPS for each group were 86.82 ± 9.7, 86.67 ± 9.92, and 85.23 ± 8.66, respectively. The DASH score for each group were 18.26 ± 19.31, 18.85 ± 15.02, and 20.19 ± 13.59, respectively. CONCLUSION: All three approaches in our trial showed similar functional results in the long-term survey. Patients treated with external fixation without internal fixation of the coronoid process showed less pain during early mobilization and acquired maximum flexion within a short duration after surgery.

Interventions for the Management of Mandibular Coronoid Process Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Background: The fracture of the coronoid process of mandible is one of the rarest fractures seen and the paucity of literature on the topic reflects the same. Despite the low incidence rate, the complications maybe grave which is why proper management is important. The treatment is controversial also because of the absence of standardized treatment protocol. This systematic review aims to compare the outcome of various treatment modalities available. Methods: Registered under PROSPERO: CRD42020200700. Systematic research was conducted across databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, Pro Quest, Wiley Online. All clinical studies done till January 2021 which included participants above 14 years of age were included. Case reports, case series and studies not mentioning the treatment plan were excluded. The studies were shortlisted by the authors based on the eligibility criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS tool and JBI checklist. Results: A total of five studies were included. Four were retrospective studies and one was a retrospective case-controlled study. Two studies reported high, two moderate and one low risk of bias. Various treatment modalities were reported for the management of coronoid process fractures including conservative management, ORIF and coronoidectomy. Most authors preferred conservative management in asymptomatic cases and surgical management in symptomatic cases. Discussion: No randomized control trials were found on the topic. Majority of the articles were case reports. Conservative management was preferred in minimally displaced fractures of coronoid process. However, in presence of displaced coronoid process fractures causing impediment of mandibular function surgical management is preferred.

Traumatic Irreducible Pediatric Radial Head Dislocations: A Unique Case and Review of the Literature.

Background: Irreducible radial head dislocations are uncommon injuries and blocks to reduction typically result from interposed soft tissue. We report the case of a pediatric patient who sustained an irreducible radial head dislocation with a concomitant posterior elbow dislocation and coronoid process fracture. To the author's knowledge, irreducible radial head dislocations presenting as part of a terrible triad like constellation of injuries have not been previously reported. A case-based review of the literature was also performed. Case Description: A 7-year-old male presents to our pediatric hospital as a transfer from an outside hospital after sustaining a posterolateral radial head and posterior elbow dislocation secondary to a fall. CT imaging and 3D reconstruction revealed a Type 1 coronoid process fracture. At our institution, closed attempts at reduction in the operating room under fluoroscopy with general anesthesia were also unsuccessful. Open reduction of the radial head and repair of the soft tissue structures was ultimately required to stabilize the patient's elbow injury. Conclusion: Irreducible pediatric radial head dislocations are rare and inherently unstable injuries. To the authors' knowledge, there are no prior reports of irreducible radial head dislocations that present in a terrible triad like fashion with a coronoid process fracture and posterior elbow dislocation. In the present report, successful treatment of this injury required open reduction and soft tissue repair. Level of Evidence: IV.

One incision-two windows approach for fixation of multifragmentary coronoid process fracture of the ulna: A case report.

Since the range of access of each surgical approach around the elbow has limitations, it is difficult to treat all types of fractures using only one approach. In the case reported herein, anterior and medial fragments of the comminuted ulnar coronoid process fracture were treated by preparing two access routes through one skin incision and effectively performing the buttress plating of each fragment. The subject was a 27-year-old female who sustained a fracture of the coronoid process of the right ulna by falling during snowboarding. Computed tomography showed the concurrence of a type 2 subtype III and type 3 subtype I ulnar coronoid process fracture according to the O'Driscoll classification. The coronoid process was split into 3 parts: a fragment consisting of the anteromedial facet and upper half of the sublime tubercle (fragment 1), a central fragment including the tip (fragment 2), and a fragment extending from the radial side of the tip to the base of the coronoid process (fragment 3). A 12-cm-long skin incision was made on the anteromedial side of the elbow joint. The region of the anteromedial facet and sublime tubercle was reached by passage between the palmaris longus/flexor digitorum superficialis and humeral head of flexor carpi ulnaris using the over-the-top approach. Fragment 1 was fixed with a buttress plate. Using the anterior approach, the brachialis was then longitudinally split through by passage between the biceps and neurovascular bundle, fragments 2 and 3 were fixed together with a buttress plate. The "one incision-two windows" approach, which provides two approaches (the over-the-top window and the anterior window) by a single skin incision, was implemented for a multifragmentary ulnar coronoid process fracture. This approach is considered to offer access from the front to each of the anterior and medial fragments and permits appropriate buttress plate fixation.

Surgical fixation of ulnar coronoid process fractures via mesh plate: A case report.

Introduction: The coronoid process of the ulna is the primary stabilizer of the elbow joint. There has not yet been an accurate off-the-shelf dedicated implant because fragments of coronoid process fractures are often small and diverse. The variable angle locking compression mesh plate 2.4/2.7 (Depuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA) acts as a versatile, low-profile implant that can be cut to suit the specific fracture pattern and fits anatomically. Case presentations: We report two cases of Regan-Morrey type II ulnar coronoid process fractures in terrible triad elbow injuries. In both cases, persistent instability was fluoroscopically diagnosed after repair of the lateral structures. We performed osteosynthesis for the ulnar coronoid process fractures using a mesh plate, which we cut into a rhombus-like shape and used as a buttress plate. Here we report the good results obtained thereof. Conclusion: Considering our positive experience with using mesh plates, the mesh plate may be a good method of fixation for ulnar coronoid process fractures.

Terrible triad injuries are no longer terrible! Functional outcomes of terrible triad injuries: a scoping review.

Background: The terrible triad injury (TTI) of the elbow is a combination of a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint combined with fractures of the radial head and coronoid process most often caused by a fall on an outstretched hand. The injury pattern was named for its poor outcomes and high complication rates following surgical repair, but increased understanding of elbow anatomy and biomechanics has led to the development of standardized surgical protocols in an attempt to improve outcomes. Most existing literature on terrible triad injuries is from small retrospective cohort studies and surgical techniques to improve outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the functional outcomes, prognosis, and complications following current surgical treatment of TTIs. Methods: A scoping review was performed to evaluate the literature. In total, 617 studies were identified and screened by 2 reviewers, with 43 studies included for qualitative analysis. These 43 studies underwent data extraction for functional outcomes using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH) and were stratified accordingly. Secondary outcome measures assessed in the study were a range of motion (ROM) and complication rate. Results: The average MEPS was 90 (excellent) from a total of 37 studies with 1609 patients, and the average DASH score was 16 from 16 studies with 441 patients. Another 6 studies with a total of 127 patients reported a mean Q-DASH score of 13. A total of 39 studies consisting of 1637 patients had a mean forearm rotation of 135 degrees, and 36 studies consisting of 1606 patients had a mean flexion-extension arc of 113 degrees. Among the studies, there was a 30% complication rate with a need for revision surgery in 7.8% of cases. The most common complications were radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification (11%) and ulnar nerve neuropathy (2.6%). Discussion/Conclusions: This study shows that current surgical treatment for terrible triad injuries has resulted in improved outcomes. Based on primary outcome measures using MEPS and DASH scores, almost all of the studies have highlighted good or excellent functional outcomes. This highlighted the marked improvement in outcome scores since the term was coined, suggesting that terrible triad injuries may no longer be so terrible.

The pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis interval approach for operative fixation of ulna coronoid process fractures.

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach for the fixation of coronoid process fractures is unknown. We present the advantages and the clinical effect of the pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis interval approach for the treatment of ulna coronoid process fractures. METHODS: The patients, who had operative treatment of closed ulna coronoid process fracture by the pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis interval approach between January 2011 to December 2016, were studied retrospectively. Seventeen consecutive patients had received surgical fixation by screws or a mini-plate through the above approach, of whom were 16 males and one female with an average age of 36.7 years (range, 21-58 years). There were 11 cases of type II and 6 cases of type III according to the O'Driscoll classification, of which, 6 patients had combined elbow dislocation, 2 patients showed elbow instability after fixation, and one had another incision to repair the lateral collateral ligament, and received a hinged external fixator. The other patient only received a hinged external fixator for 4 weeks. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to assess the function of elbow for each patient at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 28.7 months (range, 24-38 months). Fracture union was achieved in each patient; the average time to radiologic union was 14.2 weeks (range, 12-16 weeks). At the final follow-up, the elbow extension degree of the affected side was (3.88±2.96°), reaching 98.1% of the normal side, and the flexion degree was (131.59±4.93°), reaching 98.16% of the normal side. The forearm pronation was (82.94±3.86°), reaching 94.31% of the normal side, and the supination activity was (82.12±3.82°), reaching 93% of the normal side. According to the MEPS, the functional recovery of the injured arm was assessed as excellent in 16 cases, and good in one. None of the patients showed any neurovascular or deep infections and no heterotopic ossification was found. CONCLUSIONS: The pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis interval approach has the advantages of simplicity, safety, minimal invasion, excellent exposure, and good postoperative function recovery for ulna coronoid process fracture.

Correlation between fragment size of ulnar coronoid process fracture and patient prognosis / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Objective:To investigate the relationship between fragment size of ulnar coronoid process fracture and patient prognosis.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted of the 34 patients who had been treated at Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University for fracture of ulnar coronoid process combined with elbow dislocation from July 2016 to December 2020. They were assigned into 2 groups according to their different treatments. In the surgery (internal fixation) group of 23 cases, there were 15 males and 8 females, aged from 22 to 71 years; in the conservative treatment group of 11 cases, there were 8 males and 3 females, aged from 38 to 78 years. Preoperatively, the sizes of coronoid process and fracture fragments were measured by elbow CT scan and 3D reconstruction, and a size-weighted ratio Z (%) corresponding to the fragment of coronoid process fracture was calculated. At the last follow-up, American Hospital for Special Surgery total elbow scoring system (HSS2) score was used to assess their therapeutic efficacy, the correlation between the ratio Z and HSS2 score for elbow function was calculated, and complications were recorded.Results:There were no significant differences between the surgery and conservative treatment groups in gender or age ( P>0.05). All the 34 patients were followed up for 18 to 54 months (average, 36.7 months). At the last follow-up, the HSS2 score was 93.77±0.84 (from 82 to 98) for the surgery group and 86.00±1.42 (from 78 to 90) for the conservative treatment group; the complications rate was 13.04% (3/23) for the former and 63.64% (7/11) for the latter. There was a linear relationship between the size-weighted ratio Z of the coronoid fracture fragment and the HSS2 elbow function score in the surgery group ( P<0.01). The linear regression equation between them was: y=99.44-0.121x ( r2=0.86, P<0.01). There was a linear relationship between the size-weighted ratio Z of the coronoid fracture fragment and the HSS2 elbow function score in the conservative treatment group ( P<0.01). The linear regression equation between them was: y=89.46-0.144x ( r2=-0.91, P<0.01). When a HSS2 elbow joint function score 90 was substituted into both linear regression equations, the results were x=78.02 for the surgery group and x=3.75 for the conservative treatment group. Conclusions:Conservative treatment may not lead to a satisfactory prognosis for the patients with coronoid process fracture whose size-weighted ratio of fracture fragment is larger than 3.75. Open reduction and internal fixation usually leads to a satisfactory prognosis for those whose size-weighted ratio of fracture fragment is smaller than 78.02.

[Treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via a modified anteromedial approach].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a modified anteromedial approach in the treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture. METHODS: Between February 2017 and July 2018, 15 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were reviewed. There were 9 males and 6 females, with an average age of 42.3 years (range, 24-60 years). The causes of injury included falling in 10 cases and traffic accidents in 5 cases, all cases were closed injury. According to the O'Driscoll classification, there were 4 cases of type Ⅰ, 6 cases of type Ⅱ, and 5 cases of type Ⅲ. The time from injury to operation was 2-8 days (mean, 3.7 days). All fractures were treated via a modified anteromedial approach between the pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis plus with partial incision of flexor tendon aponeurosis. The fracture healing, muscle strength of forearm, postoperative complications were observed. At last follow-up, the elbow mobility were measured, the function of elbow was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). RESULTS: All cases were followed up 10-18 months (mean, 13.3 months). Fracture union was achieved in all patients with a mean time of 10 weeks (range, 8-14 weeks). No obvious decrease of hand grip strength, nerve injury, and infection occurred. One patient had slight heterotopic ossification without special treatment. At last follow-up, all patients had stable elbows with good flexion-extension and varus-valgus stability, the mean flexion was 123.3° (range, 100°-140°), mean extension loss compared with that before operation was 6.7° (range, 0°-20°), mean pronation was 76.0° (range, 60°-85°), and mean supination was 75.8° (range, 55°-90°). The MEPS score was 65-100 (mean, 90.3) with the result of excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via the modified anteromedial approach provides excellent exposure, minimal invasion, fewer complications, and satisfactory prognosis, which is conducive to elbow joint function recovery.

The lateral ligament is injured preferentially in posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between the degree of injury to the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL and LCL) and associated fractures in patients with a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow, using CT and MRI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients who presented between March 2009 and March 2018 with a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow and who underwent CT and MRI. CT revealed fractures of the radial head, coronoid process, and medial and lateral humeral epicondyles. MRI was used to identify contusion of the bone and collateral ligament injuries by tear, partial or complete tear. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients had a fracture; some had more than one. Radial head fractures were found in 25 patients and coronoid fractures in 42. Lateral and medial humeral epicondylar fractures were found in eight and six patients, respectively. Contusion of the capitellum was found in 43 patients and rupture of the LCL was seen in all patients (partial in eight and complete in 56), there was complete rupture of the MCL in 37 patients, partial rupture in 19 and eight had no evidence of rupture. The LCL tear did not significantly correlate with the presence of fracture, but the MCL rupture was complete in patients with a radial head fracture (p = 0.047) and there was significantly increased association in those without a coronoid fracture (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: In posterolateral dislocation of the elbow, LCL ruptures are mostly complete, while the MCL exhibits various degrees of injury, which are significantly associated with the associated fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):227-231.

Treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via a modified anteromedial approach / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a modified anteromedial approach in the treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture. Methods: Between February 2017 and July 2018, 15 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were reviewed. There were 9 males and 6 females, with an average age of 42.3 years (range, 24-60 years). The causes of injury included falling in 10 cases and traffic accidents in 5 cases, all cases were closed injury. According to the O'Driscoll classification, there were 4 cases of type Ⅰ, 6 cases of type Ⅱ, and 5 cases of type Ⅲ. The time from injury to operation was 2-8 days (mean, 3.7 days). All fractures were treated via a modified anteromedial approach between the pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis plus with partial incision of flexor tendon aponeurosis. The fracture healing, muscle strength of forearm, postoperative complications were observed. At last follow-up, the elbow mobility were measured, the function of elbow was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). Results: All cases were followed up 10-18 months (mean, 13.3 months). Fracture union was achieved in all patients with a mean time of 10 weeks (range, 8-14 weeks). No obvious decrease of hand grip strength, nerve injury, and infection occurred. One patient had slight heterotopic ossification without special treatment. At last follow-up, all patients had stable elbows with good flexion-extension and varus-valgus stability, the mean flexion was 123.3° (range, 100°-140°), mean extension loss compared with that before operation was 6.7° (range, 0°-20°), mean pronation was 76.0° (range, 60°-85°), and mean supination was 75.8° (range, 55°-90°). The MEPS score was 65-100 (mean, 90.3) with the result of excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case. Conclusion: The treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via the modified anteromedial approach provides excellent exposure, minimal invasion, fewer complications, and satisfactory prognosis, which is conducive to elbow joint function recovery.

Effects on Elbow Stability of the Terrible Triad Using Medial Collateral Ligament Repair and Ulnar Coronoid Process Fixation / 医用生物力学

Objective To investigate the effect of medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair and coronoid process fracture fixation on stability of the Terrible Triad of the elbow. Methods CT and MRI scan images of elbow joints from one healthy 28-year-old male volunteer were used to establish three elbow models. Model A: normal model. Model B: repair of coronoid process fractures, without MCL repair. Model C: repair of MCL, without repair of ulnar coronoid processes. Longitudinal loads were applied on the three models to analyze the displacement and stress distributions of the elbow joint under different working conditions and compare the stability of the elbow joint. Results The displacement and stress distributions of the three models were similar. The maximum displacement and maximum stress of the articular surface were located at the ulna pulley notch, while the minimum displacement was located at the coronoid process and its medial side. The minimum stress was located at the lower lateral side of the coronoid process. There were no statistical differences in the maximum displacement and stress among the three models (P>0.05). Conclusions When the lateral column is stable, the effect of repairing the MCL and fixing the fracture block of ulnar coronoid process is similar.

[Effectiveness of improved elbow anteromedial approach in treatment of ulna coronoid process fracture].

Objective: To observe the effectiveness of reduction and fixation by the improved elbow anteromedial approach in treatment of ulna coronoid process fracture. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2014, 13 patients with the ulna coronoid process fracture were treated with reduction and fixation by the improved elbow anteromedial approach. There were 10 males and 3 females with an average age of 37.2 years (range, 18-57 years). Five cases were caused by traffic accident, 7 cases by falling injury from height, and 1 case by object impact injury. Seven cases were the terrible triad of the elbow, 4 cases were the ulna coronoid process and radial head fractures, 1 case was the proximal radius and ulna fractures, and 1 case was the ulna coronoid process and distal radius fractures. According to Regan-Morrey classification criteria, the ulna coronoid process fracture was rated as type Ⅱ in 2 cases and as type Ⅲ in 11 cases. According to O'Driscoll classification criteria, 10 of the 13 cases were anterior coronoid fracture (8 cases of type Ⅱb, 2 of type Ⅱc), and 3 of basal fracture. The operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint, Mayo elbow function index (MEPI) score and fracture healing time were recorded. Results: The average operation time was 38.7 minutes (range, 30-55 minutes), and the average amount of intraoperative bleeding was 109.3 mL (range, 90-160 mL). All incisions healed at stage Ⅰ. There was no iatrogenic vascular or nerve injury. All patients were followed up 13-24 months (mean, 16.9 months). All fractures achieved clinical healing. The average healing time was 11.2 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). There were 2 cases of heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, the ROM of elbow flexion was 119-145° (mean, 132.4°); the ROM of elbow extension was -8-15° (mean, 7°). The ROM of forearm pronation was 68-90° (mean, 78.6°), and the ROM of forearm supination was 76-90° (mean, 84.3°). At last follow-up, the MEPI score was 70-100; and 9 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair. The excellent and good rate was 92.3%. Conclusion: Improved elbow anteromedial approach for the ulna coronoid process fracture can not only avoid the injuries of surrounding blood vessels and nerves, but also perform fracture reduction and fixation under direct vision. It is a safe, simple, and effective treatment method for the ulna coronoid process fracture.

[AN ANTERIOR NEUROVASCULAR INTERVAL APPROACH FOR FIXATION OF ULNA CORONOID PROCESS FRACTURE].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the advantages and effectiveness of anterior neurovascular interval approach for fixation of ulna coronoid process fracture. METHODS: Between February 2011 and April 2015, 8 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by anterior neurovascular interval approach. There were 5 males and 3 females, aged from 14 to 62 years (mean, 34 years). Fractures were caused by falling in 5 cases, traffic accident in 2 cases, and crashing in 1 case. The time between injury and operation was 1-6 days (mean, 3.5 days). According to Adams classification, there were 4 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, 2 cases of type IV, and 1 case of type V. In 1 patient with joint instability, lateral collateral ligament repair was given through another incision after fixation of coroniod fracture and the hinged external fixator, and plast splin was used to fix in the other patients; function exercise was done after removal of external fixtion. RESULTS: All incisions healed by first intention, and no complications of neurovascular injury and deep infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6-48 months (mean, 22 months). The healing time of fracture was 8-15 weeks (mean, 12.6 weeks). Mild myositis ossificans occurred in 1 case. The flexionextension arc of the elbow was (125.00±7.07)° and the forearm rotation was (135.00±7.07)°, showing no significant difference when compared with those of normal side[(126.88±7.53)° and (139.38±8.21)°] (t=0.469, P=0.654; t=2.198, P=0.054). According to Morrey's scale, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 2 cases; the excellent and good rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior neurovascular interval approach for reduction and internal fixation of ulna coroniod fractures has the advantages of simple operation, less trauma, and larger operative field. It can be used alone or combined with other surgical approaches.

[Progress on diagnosis and treatment of the terrible triad of elbow joint].

The terrible triad of elbow is a kind of complex elbow fracture dislocation, after reduction, it should get a concentric circles joint reduction and elbow stability, if radial and coronoid process fractures is less piece, the conservative treatment can be performed, but regularly follow up is mandatory. If surgical treatment was chosen, radial head fractures and the lateral collateral ligament complex must be repaired. Single lateral approach can be used and also can be combined with anteromedial approach in surgery. Some problems are still controversial in the treatment of coronoid process fracture with Morry type I and type II, such as fixation or not, whether additional external fixation and repair of the medial collateral ligament injury at the same time.

Progress on diagnosis and treatment of the terrible triad of elbow joint / 中国骨伤

The terrible triad of elbow is a kind of complex elbow fracture dislocation, after reduction, it should get a concentric circles joint reduction and elbow stability, if radial and coronoid process fractures is less piece, the conservative treatment can be performed, but regularly follow up is mandatory. If surgical treatment was chosen, radial head fractures and the lateral collateral ligament complex must be repaired. Single lateral approach can be used and also can be combined with anteromedial approach in surgery. Some problems are still controversial in the treatment of coronoid process fracture with Morry type I and type II, such as fixation or not, whether additional external fixation and repair of the medial collateral ligament injury at the same time.

AN ANTERIOR NEUROVASCULAR INTERVAL APPROACH FOR FIXATION OF ULNA CORONOID PROCESS FRACTURE / 中国修复重建外科杂志

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the advantages and effectiveness of anterior neurovascular interval approach for fixation of ulna coronoid process fracture. METHODS: Between February 2011 and April 2015, 8 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by anterior neurovascular interval approach. There were 5 males and 3 females, aged from 14 to 62 years (mean, 34 years). Fractures were caused by falling in 5 cases, traffic accident in 2 cases, and crashing in 1 case. The time between injury and operation was 1-6 days (mean, 3.5 days). According to Adams classification, there were 4 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, 2 cases of type IV, and 1 case of type V. In 1 patient with joint instability, lateral collateral ligament repair was given through another incision after fixation of coroniod fracture and the hinged external fixator, and plast splin was used to fix in the other patients; function exercise was done after removal of external fixtion. RESULTS: All incisions healed by first intention, and no complications of neurovascular injury and deep infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6-48 months (mean, 22 months). The healing time of fracture was 8-15 weeks (mean, 12.6 weeks). Mild myositis ossificans occurred in 1 case. The flexionextension arc of the elbow was (125.00±7.07)° and the forearm rotation was (135.00±7.07)°, showing no significant difference when compared with those of normal side[(126.88±7.53)° and (139.38±8.21)°] (t=0.469, P=0.654; t=2.198, P=0.054). According to Morrey's scale, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 2 cases; the excellent and good rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior neurovascular interval approach for reduction and internal fixation of ulna coroniod fractures has the advantages of simple operation, less trauma, and larger operative field. It can be used alone or combined with other surgical approaches.

Surgical Outcomes after Olecranon Plating with Retrograde Coronoid Process Screw Fixation through the Plate Hole in the Bifocal Fracture of the Proximal Ulna / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: Bifocal fracture of the proximal ulna is a fracture of the olecranon accompanied by fracture of the coronoid process. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the clinical results of the author's technique in bifocal fracture of the proximal ulna. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (10 men, 5 women) treated at CHA Bundang Medical Center from April 2006 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent internal fixation using a locking compression plate (LCP) with retrograde screw fixation of the coronoid process through a screw hole of the plate. Mean age of the patients was 42.6 years and the mean follow-up period was 18.6 months. Comminuted coronoid fractures with hard to screw fixation, complex injuries combined with open damage, and complete ligament rupture were excluded. Fracture union and articular congruity were examined on the follow-up radiographs. Range of motion, disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, and Mayo elbow performance score were evaluated for functional analysis. RESULTS: Fracture union was achieved and articular step off was less than 2 mm in all patients on the follow-up radiographs. The mean value of modified Mayo elbow score was 92.14 (80–100) and DASH score was 7.11 at last follow-up. The mean range of motion of elbow was 128o. There was one case of small heterotopic ossification as a radiographic complication which had no functional deficit. CONCLUSION: Internal fixation of bifocal multifragmentary articular fractures of the proximal ulna with anatomically contoured LCP olecranon plate and retrograde long screws could be a recommendable surgical procedure. This study showed that the precontoured plate with retrograde coronoid process screw fixation can produce good clinical and radiographic outcomes in bifocal fractures of the proximal ulna. We recommend this procedure in this type of fracture.

Severe injury of bilateral elbow joints with unilateral terrible triad of the elbow and unilateral suspected terrible triad of the elbow complicated with olecranon fracture: one case report.

Terrible triad of the elbow is characterized as posterior dislocation of the elbow joint accompanied by the fractures of the radial head and coronoid process of the ulna, which is rarely seen in clinical practice, especially because the mild fracture is barely detected by imaging method In this study, we reported one case of serious complex bilateral elbow injury, presenting with unilateral typical terrible triad of the elbow and suspected terrible triad of the elbow complicated with olecranon fracture on the other side. Clinical experience was obtained during the diagnosis and treatment procedures.

How should anteromedial coronoid facet fracture be managed? A surgical strategy based on O'Driscoll classification and ligament injury.

BACKGROUND: Despite an improved understanding of coronoid anteromedial facet (AMF) fractures, the optimal treatment protocol and technique have not yet been established. The goals of the study were to describe the characteristics of AMF fractures, to suggest a surgical strategy, and to report the outcomes after treatment according to this protocol. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 19 patients with AMF fractures between 2010 and 2012. Eight patients were excluded because of secondary olecranon fracture, radial head fracture, and elbow dislocation, leaving 11 patients with isolated AMF fracture in the study cohort. There were 7 men and 4 women, with an average age of 42 years (range, 29-62 years). Fracture classification, injury pattern, and accompanying collateral ligament injury were analyzed. O'Driscoll subtype 1 fractures were treated with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) repair; O'Driscoll subtype 2 and subtype 3 fractures were treated with buttress plating and LCL repair. Plain radiographs were used to evaluate union, arthritic change, and joint articulation. Functional outcomes were evaluated with range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. RESULTS: Two patients had O'Driscoll anteromedial subtype 1 fracture, 4 patients had subtype 2, and 5 patients had subtype 3. Two patients with subtype 1 fracture had associated posterior dislocation; 9 patients with subtype 2 or subtype 3 had associated varus posteromedial injury. All 11 patients had associated LCL injury, and 6 patients had associated medial collateral ligament injury. The mean range of motion was 128°, and the average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 89 points. Qualitatively, patient outcomes were scored excellent in 4 patients, good in 6 patients, and fair in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: AMF fractures are almost always accompanied by collateral ligament injuries. Thus, our surgical strategies, which include collateral ligament repair, are able to stabilize and result in favorable clinical outcomes. On the basis of our results, we recommend LCL repair alone for subtype 1 fractures and buttress plating and LCL repair for subtype 2 and subtype 3 fractures.