ABSTRACT
Context: Although preservation of the tooth structure is quoted as the main advantage of sealing of carious lesions, there are no long-term studies comparing the maintenance of dental tissue after restoration or after caries sealing. Aim: To measure the radiographically visible loss of dental tissue after conventional restoration and sealing of carious lesions. Subjects and Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled clinical trials, one conducted in Brazil and another in Belgium, which evaluated two different therapies for the treatment of occlusal carious lesions in permanent teeth: sealant (SE) without previous carious tissue removal or restoration (RE) with total removal of carious dentin. The greater depth and width of sealed carious lesions and restorations were compared. Statistical Analysis: The independent t-test was used to compare therapies at different time points, while the paired t-test was used to compare the same therapy over time. Results: Carious lesions in the RE and SE groups showed similar measurements at baseline (P > 0.05). Over time, significantly greater loss of tooth structure was observed in the RE group than in the SE group. No increase in lesion depth or width was observed in the SE group, suggesting no progression of sealed lesions. Conclusion: Sealing of carious lesions resulted in greater preservation of dental tissue.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect and the retention rates of sealants prepared with a new modified and a high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (GIC) in recently erupted first permanent molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six children (224 teeth) were included in a split-mouth randomised clinical trial. All children had their four first permanent molars sealed with either Clinpro XT Varnish (CXT) or Fuji IX GP FAST (FJ). FJ sealants were placed according to the ART protocol. Retention rates and caries-preventive effect of both materials were assessed clinically after 24 months, and survival curves were created according to the Kaplan-Meier method. For sealant retention rates, analyses were performed according to both the traditional method and modified sealant retention categorisation. RESULTS: FJ sealants were retained longer in comparison to CXT sealants (p < 0.05), regardless of the categorisation used. In relation to the caries-preventive effect, no statistically significant differences were observed between materials (p = 0.99). Sealants prepared with the high-viscosity GIC according to the ART protocol survived longer than those prepared with the modified GIC, but both materials were equally effective in preventing cavitated dentine lesions over 24 months. CONCLUSION: We concluded that GIC-based sealants are effective in preventing dentine caries lesions.