Contralateral Tension Pneumothorax in One-Lung Ventilation: A Case Report and Systematic Review.

Contralateral tension pneumothorax is a rare but fatal complication of one-lung ventilation. The life-saving decompression of pleural space was frequently delayed by the difficult confirmation of diagnosis because of general anesthesia that masks specific clinical presentations when the patient is alert. We reported a case of tension pneumothorax in a patient who underwent thoracic spine instrumentation. There were no contralateral tension pneumothorax cases on file from the search of the Anesthesia Quality Institute Closed Claims Database from 2001 to 2017. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Over the past 30 years, there were 21 single case reports and two case series were retrieved. It was a consensus that difficult confirmation of the diagnosis of contralateral tension pneumothorax is the culprit of delayed life-saving intervention. Difficulty of oxygenation with increasing inspiratory pressure was usually the first sign suggesting contralateral pneumothorax; however, earlier presentations of cardiovascular system failure than respiratory failure have significantly increased the incidence of cardiac arrest and death. It is paramount to maintain a high suspicion of tension pneumothorax. The application of esophageal stethoscope, lung ultrasound, and simulator training may improve the chance of early diagnosis and patient outcome.

A novel combined approach to placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube using a video laryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope: a retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate a modern combined video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope approach to placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube and further characterize potential strengths and weaknesses of this approach. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted at our single institution, academic medical center, tertiary-care hospital. Patients aged 18 years of age or older were evaluated who underwent thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation with placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube using a novel combined video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope approach. No interventions were performed. RESULTS: Demographics and induction and intubation documentation were reviewed for 21 patients who underwent thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation with placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube using a novel combined video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope approach. First pass success using the combined approach was 86% (18/21). The five patients with an anticipated difficult airway had successful double lumen endobronchial tube placement on the first attempt. There were no instances of desaturation during double lumen endobronchial tube placement. No airway complications related to double lumen endobronchial tube placement were recorded. CONCLUSION: Use of a combined approach employing video laryngoscopy and a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope may represent a reliable alternative approach to placement of double lumen endobronchial tubes.

Double lumen endobronchial tube intubation: lessons learned from anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Double lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) are frequently used to employ single lung ventilation strategies during thoracic surgical procedures. Placement of these tubes can be challenging even for experienced clinicians. We hypothesized that airway anatomy, particularly of the glottis and proximal trachea, significantly impacts the ease or difficulty in placement of these tubes. METHODS: Images from 24 randomly selected Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) scans were evaluated for several anatomic aspects of the upper airway, including size and angulation of the glottis and proximal tracheal using calibrated CT measurements and an online digital protractor. The anatomic issues identified were confirmed in cadaveric anatomic models. RESULTS: Proximal tracheal diameter measurements in PET-CT scans demonstrated a mean ± standard deviation of 20.4 ± 2.5 mm in 12 males and 15.5 ± 0.98 mm in 12 females (p < 0.001), and both were large enough to accommodate 39 French and 37 French DLTs in males and females, respectively. Subsequent measurements of the posterior angulation of the proximal trachea revealed a mean angle of 40.8 ± 5.7 degrees with no sex differences. By combining the 24 individual posterior tracheal angles with the 16 angled distal tip measurements DLTs (mean angle 24.9 ± 2.1 degrees), we created a series of 384 patient intubation angle scenarios. This data clearly showed that DLT rotation to a full 180 degrees decreased the mean intubation angle between the DLT and the proximal trachea from a mean of 66.6 ± 5.9 to only 15.8 ± 5.9 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Rotation of DLTs a full 180 instead of the recommended 90 degrees facilitates DLT intubations.

Does the periportal end of a double-lumen endobronchial tube need to be fixed to prevent dislocation of the cuffed end caused by a change in position? A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects on the dislocation and misalignment of the cuffed end of a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) when a patient moves from a horizontal to a lateral position without fixation. METHODS: A total of 148 patients who had undergone video-assisted thoracoscope surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: a group in which the periportal end of the DLT was fixed with tape (group I; n = 74) and a group in which the periportal end of the DLT remained unfixed (group II; n = 74). Both groups were given an intravenous induction for double-lumen endobronchial intubation and then moved from a horizontal position to a lateral position, after which the alignment of the bronchial cuffed end of the DLT was assessed using a fiberoptic bronchoscope. RESULTS: After lateral position, the dislocation rate of group I and group II was 44.6% and 20.2%, and the misalignment rate was 27.0% and 8.1%, respectively, the incidence of dislocation and misalignment was significantly lower in group II than in group I after the change to a lateral position (p < 0.05). After lateral position, the total rate of airway injury was 25.7% in group I and 5.4% in group II, the incidence of airway injury was significantly lower in group II than in group I (p < 0.05), as was the incidence of sore throat, hoarseness, and cough on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.05). The average outward dislocation of the periportal end of the DLT in group II was 1.5 cm. CONCLUSION: A DLT without periportal fixation is less likely to be displaced and poorly aligned when the patient moves from a horizontal to a lateral position, which could facilitate intra-operative management and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Through a randomized controlled trial, this study innovatively found that no double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) peripheral tape binding can prevent the dislocation and misalignment of the DLT bronchial cuffed end in patients undergoing thoracic surgery from horizontal to lateral position.

Double Lumen Endobronchial Tube Placement for Lung Separation via a Tracheostomy Stoma in a Patient Status-Post Laryngectomy.

A 63-year-old male with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx status-post laryngectomy and tracheostomy presented for a robotic-assisted right upper lobectomy for neoplasm excision. On physical examination, he was noted to have moderate hypoxia with an SpO2 of 93% on room air. In order to facilitate potential apneic oxygen insufflation and continuous positive airway pressure in the operative lung, a traditional left-sided 35-French double-lumen endobronchial tube was placed through his tracheostomy, and utilized to facilitate lung separation and to improve surgical manipulation. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was extubated to a tracheostomy collar with a 100% fraction of inspired oxygen delivered with 15 liters per minute of flow.

Combined use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker vs. a double-lumen endobronchial tube in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The combined use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker may reduce postoperative hoarseness and sore throat. We aimed to test the feasibility and efficacy of this combination technique in thoracoscopic surgery. DESIGN: A single-center, patient-assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Nagoya City University Hospital (between November 2020 and April 2022). PATIENTS: A total of 100 adult patients undergoing lobectomy or segmentectomy by video- or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to either group using a combination of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker (pLMA+BB group) or a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT group). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the hoarseness incidence on 1-3 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included sore throat, intraoperative complications (hypoxemia, hypercapnia, surgical interruption, malposition of devices, unintended lung expansion, and ventilatory difficulty), lung collapse, device placement-related outcomes, and coughing during emergence. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 100 patients underwent randomization (51 to the pLMA+BB group and 49 to the DLT group). After drop outs, a total of 49 patients in each group were analyzed per-protocol. The incidences of hoarseness in the pLMA+BB and DLT groups were 42.9% and 53.1% (difference, -10.2%; 95% confidence interval, -30.1% to 10.3%; p = 0.419), 18.4% vs. 32.7%, and 20.4% vs. 24.5% on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The incidences of sore throat in the pLMA+BB and DLT groups were 16.3% vs. 34.7% (difference, -18.4%; 95% confidence interval, -35.9% to -0.9%; p = 0.063) on postoperative day 1. In the pLMA+BB group, more intraoperative complications and less coughing during emergence were observed compared to the DLT group. Lung collapse and placement-related outcomes were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and bronchial blocker did not significantly reduce hoarseness compared to the double-lumen endobronchial tube.

Extubation by supraglottic airway after lobectomy prevents cough-associated air leaks and prolonged coughing or sore throat.

OBJECTIVES: Double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) are essential for differential lung ventilation during pulmonary lobectomy, but they are more rigid, longer, larger in diameter and irritable. Coughing at extubation sometimes causes airway and lung injury, which causes severe air leaks, prolonged cough and sore throat. We examined the prevalence of cough-associated air leaks at extubation and postoperative cough or sore throat after lobectomy and evaluated the efficacy of supraglottic airway (SGA) in preventing these complications. METHODS: Patient characteristics and operative and postoperative factors data were collected from patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy between January 2013 and March 2022. After propensity score matching, these data were compared between the SGA and DLT groups. RESULTS: A total of 1069 patients with lung cancer (SGA, 641; DLTs, 428) were enrolled and coughing at extubation occurred in 100 (23.4%) patients in the DLT group, 65 (65.0%) showed increased cough-associated air leaks at extubation and 20 (30.8%) showed prolonged air leaks. Coughing at extubation occurred in 6 (0.9%) in the SGA group. In 193 patients from each group after propensity score matching, coughing at extubation and the associated air leak increase were significantly lower in the SGA group. Visual analogue scale of postoperative cough and sore throat on postoperative days 2, 7 and 30 were significantly lower in the SGA group. CONCLUSIONS: SGA is effective and safe for preventing cough-associated air leaks and prolonged postoperative cough or sore throat at extubation following pulmonary lobectomy.

Depth of double-lumen endobronchial tube: a comparison between real practice and clinical recommendations using height-based formulae.

BACKGROUND: The depth of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) is reportedly known tobe directly proportional to height and several height-based recommendations have beensuggested. This retrospective study was designed to find out the difference between calculated depths using height-based formulae and realistic depths in clinical practice of DLTplacement by analyzing pooled data from patients intubated with left-sided DLT. METHODS: The electronic medical records of adults, intubated with DLT from February 2018to December 2020, were reviewed. Data retrieved included age, sex, height, weight, andsize and depth of DLT. The finally documented DLT depth (depth final, DF) was comparedwith the calculated depths, and the relationship between height and DF was also evaluated.A questionnaire on endobronchial intubation method was sent to anesthesiologists. RESULTS: A total of 503 out of 575 electronic records of consecutive patients were analyzed.Although the relationship between height and DF was shown to have significant correlation(Spearman's rho = 0.63, P < 0.001), DF was shown to be significantly greater than calculated depths (P < 0.001). Despite 57.1% of anesthesiologists have knowledge of clinical recommendations to anticipate size and depth of DLT, no one routinely utilizes those recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists tend to place DLTs in a deeper position than expected whendepths are calculated using height-based recommendations. Although such discrepanciesmay not be clinically meaningful, efforts are needed to standardize the methods of endobronchial intubation to prevent potential complications associated with malposition.

A Randomized Study of Rigid Video Stylet versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation Assistance in Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Surgery.

Double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) intubation is more challenging than single-lumen tube intubation is, and the rigid video stylet (RVS) is one of the tools that has emerged to deal with this demanding intubation procedure. We evaluated whether the UE® RVS can shorten the DLT intubation time and improve the first-attempt intubation success rate compared with that of Macintosh laryngoscope (ML). A total of 130 participants scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic pulmonary surgeries were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either ML- or RVS-assisted DLT intubation. The primary outcomes were the intubation time and first-attempt intubation success rate. The secondary outcomes were the overall intubation success rate, mean arterial pressure, postoperative sore throat (POST), and postoperative hoarseness at 1 h and 24 h. Compared with the ML group, the intubation time was significantly shorter in the RVS group (p < 0.001; 30.82 ± 10.61 vs. 39.62 ± 6.54 s), however, the first-attempt success rate was significantly lower (p = 0.048; 83.08% vs. 95.16%). The POST at 1 h was less severe in the RVS group (p = 0.021). No significant differences were found for the other indicators. Among the patients with normal airways, the UE® RVS can achieve faster DLT intubation and decrease the severity of a POST at 1 h, although it was associated with a lower first-attempt intubation success rate.

Comparison of Time to Intubation of a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Utilizing C-MAC® Versus GlideScope® Versus Macintosh Blade: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

BACKGROUND: Macintosh blade direct laryngoscopy is widely used for endotracheal intubation. It may, however, provide an incomplete view of the glottis in patients with challenging airway anatomy. Consequently, various video laryngoscopes have been developed to enhance the visualization of the glottis and facilitate intubation. Yet, the effectiveness of these video laryngoscopes for intubation using a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT), which is longer, larger, and more rigid and has a linear configuration as opposed to the naturally semicircular curvature of a single-lumen endotracheal tube, remains uncertain. We hypothesized that video laryngoscopes would be more efficient for DLT intubation compared to the Macintosh blade in an adult manikin. METHODS: Ninety-four anesthesia providers, comprising 67 residents, 15 fellows, and 12 attendings, attempted to intubate an adult manikin with normal airway anatomy (Laerdal, Wappingers Falls, NY, USA) using a 37 Fr left-sided DLT. Three different intubation devices were used: the C-MAC® video laryngoscope (Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany), the GlideScope® video laryngoscope (Verathon Inc., Bothell, WA), and the Macintosh blade direct laryngoscope-were used. Each participant intubated a manikin once with each of the three devices. Participants were randomized via a crossover design with the order of devices determined by using a Latin square design. Time to intubation and the number of failed intubations (esophageal intubation) were compared across the three different devices. RESULTS: Mean times to intubation for the C-MAC®, GlideScope®, and Macintosh blades were 18.57 ± 0.77, 36.26 ± 2.69, and 20.76 ± 0.96 seconds, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) between the GlideScope® and the other two laryngoscopes. The times for C-MAC® and Macintosh blades were not significantly different. There were two instances of first-attempt failed intubation with the Macintosh. CONCLUSION: Both the C-MAC® and the Macintosh blades proved more efficient in terms of time to DLT intubation in the manikin with normal airway anatomy, when compared to the GlideScope®. Considering the occurrence of first-attempt failed intubation, the C-MAC® was the most effective device among the three laryngoscopes for timely successful DLT intubation in the adult manikin. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in human subjects.

Right displacement of trachea to reduce right bronchial misplacement of left double lumen tube: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Misplacement of double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) during bronchial intubation, especially when bronchoscopy guidance is not applicable, threatens effective lung isolation and brings about airway injury during reposition. We aimed to examine whether a novel maneuver called right tracheal displacement (RTD) can reduce left-sided DLT misplacement during first-attempt intubation without bronchoscopy guidance. METHODS: Patients that underwent thoracic surgeries requiring one-lung ventilation during November 2020 to January 2021 were recruited and randomized into control and RTD group, with 54 cases in each group. The primary outcomes included the incidence of DLT misplacement and the time to complete desired bronchial intubation. The secondary outcomes included mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness upon emergence and at 24 h post-operatively. RESULT: The incidence of DLT misplacement in RTD group was significantly lower compared to control group (0% vs. 16.7%) The time to complete bronchial intubation was also significantly shortened in RTD group compared to control (52.88 ± 9.36 s vs. 63.04 ± 20.02 s). The incidence of mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSION: RTD maneuver can effectively improve the success rate of first-attempt proper DLT positioning and shorten the time required by bronchial intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This prospective, double-blind, randomized study has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 2/11/2020 with the registration number ChiCTR2000040212. It was conducted from 26/11/2020 to 31/7/2021 in third affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen university.

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy and pulmonary haemorrhage.

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery is the recommended treatment for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Massive intraoperative pulmonary haemorrhage with bleeding into the airway is a rare complication, and it typically presents as cardiopulmonary bypass flow is reduced and blood begins to flow through the pulmonary circulation. Immediate management includes maintaining extracorporeal circulation to reduce blood flow through the pulmonary circulation, isolation of the affected lung, while the surgeon identifies and repairs the site of haemorrhage.

Error traps in pediatric one-lung ventilation.

With the advent of thoracoscopic surgery, the benefits of lung isolation in children have been increasingly recognized. However, because of the small airway dimensions, equipment limitations in size and maneuverability, and limited respiratory reserve, one-lung ventilation in children remains challenging. This article highlights some of the most common error traps in the management of pediatric lung isolation and focuses on practical solutions for their management. The error traps discussed are as follows: (1) the failure to take into consideration relevant aspects of tracheobronchial anatomy when selecting the size of the lung isolation device, (2) failure to execute correct placement of the device chosen for lung isolation, (3) failure to maintain lung isolation related to surgical manipulation and isolation device movement, (4) failure to select appropriate ventilator strategies during one-lung ventilation, and (5) failure to appropriately manage and treat hypoxemia in the setting of one-lung ventilation.

Intraoperative Anesthetic Management of the Thoracic Patient.

The intraoperative anesthetic management for thoracic surgery can impact a patient's postoperative course, especially in patients with significant lung disease. One-lung ventilation poses an inherent risk to patients, including hypoxemia, acute lung injury, and right ventricular dysfunction. Patient-specific ventilator management strategies during one-lung ventilation can reduce postoperative morbidity.

Volume of tidal gas movement in the nonventilated lung during one-lung ventilation and its relevant factors.

BACKGROUND: The passive ventilation of nonventilated lung results in tidal gas movement (TGM) and thus affects lung collapse. The present study aimed to measure the volume of TGM and to analyse the relevant factors of the TGM index (TGM/body surface area). METHODS: One hundred eight patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgeries were enrolled. Lung isolation was achieved with a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT). The paediatric spirometry sensor was connected to the double-lumen connector of the nonventilated lung to measure the volume of TGM during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in the lateral position. The TGM index was calculated. The multiple linear regression was analysed using the TGM index as the dependent variables. Independent variables were also recorded: 1) age, sex, body mass index (BMI); 2) forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, minute ventilation volume (MVV); 3) dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during dual lung ventilation; 4) the side of OLV; and 5) whether lung puncture for localization of the pulmonary nodule was performed on the day of surgery. The oxygen concentration in the nonventilated lung was measured at 5 min after OLV, and its correlation with the TGM index was analysed. RESULTS: The volume of TGM in the nonventilated lung during OLV was 78 [37] mL. The TGM index was 45 [20] mL/m2 and was negatively correlated with the oxygen concentration in the nonventilated lung at 5 min after OLV. The multiple linear regression model for the TGM index was deduced as follows: TGM index (mL/m2) = C + 12.770 × a - 3.987 × b-1.237 × c-2.664 × d, where C is a constant 95.621 mL/m2, a is 1 for males and 0 for females, b is 1 for right OLV and 0 for left OLV, c is BMI (kg/m2), and d is PIP (cmH2O). CONCLUSIONS: The TGM index is negatively correlated with the oxygen concentration of the nonventilated lung at 5 min after OLV. Sex, side of OLV, BMI and PIP are independently correlated with the TGM index. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ChiCTR (www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900024220) on July 1, 2019.

Airway Management of the Right Anterior Segmentectomy through Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) after left pneumonectomy by an adapted double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT): a case report.

BACKGROUND: Lung resection after previous contralateral pneumonectomy is rare. We present a case of right anterior segmentectomy despite previous left pneumonectomy, demanding special airway management strategy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old woman who had left pneumonectomy 2 years ago was scheduled to have the right anterior segmentectomy through uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS). A 32-French (Fr) left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) was chosen and adapted. The DLT was intubated into the bronchus intermedius. And the upper lobe can be isolated from the ventilation in the middle and lower lobes when the bronchial cuff's inflated. The perioperative period was uneventful and the pathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Lung cancer radical resection was discouraged after previous contralateral pneumonectomy partly due to the challenging ventilation and isolation. With this new DLT adapting and intubation technique showed in this case, the challenging ventilation and isolation that deter the implementation of the operation mentioned above could be solved.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Utility of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Intubation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare GlideScope and lighted stylet for double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) intubation in terms of intubation time, success rate of first attempt at intubation, difficulty in DLT advancement toward the glottis, and postoperative sore throat and hoarseness. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Medical center governed by a university hostpial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery using DLT intubation. INTERVENTION: After the induction of anesthesia, DLT intubation was performed using GlideScope (n = 32) or lighted stylet (n = 32). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Number of intubation attempts, difficulty of DLT advancement toward the glottis, time taken for DLT intubation, and the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness at 1 and 24 hours after surgery were evaluated. Time taken for DLT intubation was shorter in the lighted stylet group compared with the GlideScope group (30 [28-32] s v 45 [38-53] s, median [interquartile range], respectively; p < 0.001). DLT advancement toward the glottis was easier in the lighted stylet group than in the GlideScope group (p = 0.016). The success rate of DLT intubation in the first attempt (96.9% v 90.6% for lighted stylet and GlideScope, respectively), and the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lighted stylet allowed easier advancement of the DLT toward the glottis in the oropharyngeal space and reduced time for achieving DLT intubation compared with GlideScope.

The History of One-Lung Anesthesia and the Double-Lumen Tube.

One-lung anesthesia presents many practical, anatomical, and physiological challenges to the anesthetist in modern day practice. The techniques and equipment that we use today have developed slowly over the course of the last century. The idea of isolated lung ventilation came from bronchospirometry studies by pioneering physiologists as early as 1871, and some of their original equipment was adapted for clinical use in the 1930s. Anesthetic techniques have generally been developed to facilitate surgical advances, and the development of double-lumen tubes is no exception. The development of the double-lumen tube was sporadic and occurred mainly to allow more complex thoracic procedures, mostly associated with suppurative lung disease. Once the need for independent ventilation of the lungs was identified in clinical practice, pioneers of the technique developed their own methods and often their own equipment. This led to the ability of the anesthetist to be able to control ventilation to each lung, including collapse of the operative lung and protection of the isolated lung against contamination. As these anesthetics became more reliable, the surgical scope for one-lung anesthesia began to broaden, and today one-lung ventilation is used to facilitate thoracic surgery, mainly on the lung, but also esophageal, thoracic wall, and mediastinal surgical procedures.

A randomised trial comparing real-time double-lumen endobronchial tube placement with the Disposcope® with conventional blind placement.

Double-lumen endobronchial tube placement is challenging. This study compared double-lumen tube placement with the Disposcope® , a wireless videostylet allowing real-time visualisation, with conventional blind placement. Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with normal airways requiring one-lung ventilation were randomly allocated into two groups (27 patients in each group). The Disposcope was used to assist left-sided double-lumen tube placement in one group, and conventional blind placement was performed in the control group. Placement in both groups was checked with fibreoptic bronchoscopy. The Disposcope-assisted group had a shorter total mean (SD) placement time (18.6 (2.5) s vs. 21.4 (2.9) s, p < 0.001), laryngoscopy to end of auscultation time (83.4 (3.0) s vs. 93.9 (5.7) s, p < 0.001) and total operation time (130.7 (6.1) s vs. 154.5 (6.3) s, p < 0.001). In the Disposcope-assisted group, the double-lumen tube was inserted in the correct side in all patients (100.0%), whereas in the conventional group, the double-lumen tube was placed in the correct side in 25 (92.6%) patients and in the wrong side in 2 (7.4%) patients; the difference was not significant (p = 0.150). In the Disposcope-assisted group, the double-lumen tube was inserted to the optimal depth in 24 (88.9%) patients, whereas in the conventional group it was inserted to the optimal depth in one (4.0%) patient. The Disposcope increased the success rate of double-lumen tube placement, and shortened the total operation time when compared with standard placement with confirmation using fibreoptic bronchoscopy, and may replace the conventional method.