Unrealistic expectations and disclosure of incurability in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Determining whether patients' unrealistic expectations of chemotherapy as a cure were associated with their perception of the disclosure of incurability. METHODS: This prospective study included consecutive patients with pretreated non-small cell lung cancer from four study sites. Patients and their oncologists were asked whether they perceived the disclosure of cancer incurability. Patients were also asked if they thought that chemotherapy was curative. We followed up on whether the deceased patients received specialized palliative care 14 months after their last enrollment. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between the expectation of chemotherapy as a cure and patient/oncologist-reported perceptions of the disclosure of incurability. RESULTS: We analyzed 200 patients, 77 (38.5%) of whom had unrealistic expectations of a cure. Based on patients' perceptions, incurability was disclosed to 138 (69.0%) patients, and based on their oncologists' perceptions, incurability was disclosed to 185 (92.5%) patients (patient/oncologist agreements, κ = 0.19). Patients without a perception of the oncologist's disclosure of incurability-regardless of their oncologist's perception-were more likely to have unrealistic expectations of a cure than patients for whom both patient and oncologist perceptions were present. Patients who had unrealistic expectations of chemotherapy as a cure were shown to be significantly less likely to have received specialized palliative care, after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.91; p = .027). CONCLUSION: Oncologists' disclosure of incurability was not fully recognized by patients, and expectations of chemotherapy as a cure were associated with patients' perception of the disclosure of incurability.

The trajectory of prognostic cognition in patients with advanced cancer: is the traditional advance care planning approach desirable for patients?

Most patients with advanced cancer initially express a desire to be informed of their prognosis, and prognostic discussions between patients and their oncologists can trigger the subsequent trajectory of prognostic cognitions. On the continuum of prognostic cognition, including inaccurate/accurate prognostic awareness (awareness of incurability of cancer, terminal nature of illness or life expectancy) and prognostic acceptance (accepting one's prognosis), patients' perceptions of being informed of their prognosis by oncologists and patients' coping strategy for serious medical conditions regulate prognostic cognitions. However, nearly half of the patients with advanced cancer have poor prognostic awareness, and few patients achieve prognostic acceptance. These phenomena partly act as barriers to participation in advance care planning. When oncologists engage in advance care planning conversations, they must assess the patient's prognostic cognition and readiness for advance care planning. Considering the inaccurate prognostic awareness in a non-negligible proportion of patients and that astatic patients' preferences for future treatment and care are influenced by prognostic cognition, more research on decision-making support processes for high-quality and goal-concordant end-of-life care is needed along with research of advance care planning. In addition to making decisions regarding future medical treatment and care, oncologists must engage in continuous and dynamic goal-of-care conversations with empathic communication skills and compassion from diagnosis to end-of-life care.

Elements of End-of-Life Discussions Associated With Patients' Reported Outcomes and Actual End-of-Life Care in Patients With Pretreated Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: End-of-life discussions for patients with advanced cancer are internationally recommended to ensure consistency of end-of-life care with patients' values. This study examined the elements of end-of-life discussions associated with end-of-life care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study among consecutive patients with pretreated non-small cell lung cancer after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. We asked oncologists whether they had ever discussed "prognosis," "do not attempt resuscitation," "hospice," and "preferred place of death" with a patient at baseline. The quality of life (QOL) and depressive symptoms of patients were assessed using validated questionnaires at baseline and 3 months later. The end-of-life care that patients received was investigated using medical records. Oncologists' compassion and caregivers' preferences for hospice care were also assessed using questionnaires. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between elements of end-of-life discussions and patient-reported outcomes as well as actual end-of-life care. RESULTS: We obtained 200 valid responses at baseline, 147 valid responses 3 months later, and 145 data points for medical care at the end-of-life stage. No element of the end-of-life discussion between the patient and their oncologist was significantly associated with patients' reported outcomes or actual end-of-life care. In addition, oncologists' compassion was significantly associated with improvement in both comprehensive QOL and depressive symptoms, and caregivers' preferences for hospice care and high educational level were significantly associated with hospice death. CONCLUSION: Oncologist-patient alliances and caregivers' involvement in end-of-life discussions may be influential in achieving optimal end-of-life care.

Qualitative analysis of expressions used in the end-of-life discussions and their associated factors.

OBJECTIVES: Discussing end-of-life (EOL) issues with patients remains challenging for health professionals. Physicians may use various expressions, including euphemistic ones, when disclosing the prognosis to their patients to reduce their psychological impact. However, the actual expressions of EOL disclosure in clinical practice are unclear. This study aims to investigate the expressions used in EOL disclosures and explore their associated factors. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted enrolling all the patients who died in a university-affiliated hospital. Expressions used in the EOL disclosure were qualitatively analyzed. The patients' participation rate and length from the discussion to death were investigated. RESULTS: EOL disclosures were observed in 341 of 358 patients. The expressions used by the physicians were categorized into 4 groups; Group 1: Clear presentation of life expectancy (n = 106; 31.1%), Group 2: Euphemistic presentation of life expectancy (n = 24; 7.0%), Group 3: Presentation of risk of sudden death (n = 147; 43.1%), Group 4: No mention on life expectancy (n = 64; 18.8%). The proportion of male patients was higher in Group 2 (79%) and lower in Group 4 (56%). Patients with cancer accounted for approximately 70% of Groups 1 and 4, but only approximately 30% of Group 3. The patient participation rate was highest in Group4 (84.4%), followed by Group 2 (50.0%). The median time from EOL disclosure to death was longer in Groups 1 and 4 (26 and 29.5 days, respectively), compared to Groups 2 and 3 (18.5 and 16 days, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: A variety of expressions are used in EOL disclosure. Patterns of communication are influenced by patients' gender and type of illness (cancer or noncancer). Euphemisms do not seem to facilitate timely disclosure of life expectancy or patient participation. For health professionals, not only devising the expressions to alleviate their patients' distress when breaking bad news but also considering the communication process and patient background are essential.

End-of-life care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbation (AE) is a major cause of death in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). AE-IPF patients require optimal palliative care; however, the real-world clinical situations are poorly understood. We aimed to survey the palliative care received by AE-IPF patients, especially with respect to opioid use for dyspnea and the end-of-life discussions (EOLd). METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires were dispatched to 3423 of the certified pulmonary physicians in Japan. They were asked to report a care report form of one patient each with AE-IPF who died very recently about opioid use for dyspnea and EOLd. We further explored the factors associated with the early use of opioids for dyspnea. RESULTS: Among the 3423 physicians, 1226 (35.8%) returned the questionnaire with the report forms of 539 AE-IPF patients. Of 539 AE-IPF patients, 361 (67.0%) received opioids for dyspnea. Of the 361 patients, 72 (20.0%) received opioids during the initial treatment with an intention of recovery (early use), while 289 (80.0%) did when the recovery was deemed impossible. EOLd was held before the onset of AE in 124 patients (23.0%); however, the majority of patients had EOLd after the admission for AE-IPF. EOLd before the onset of AE was significantly associated with the early use of opioids. CONCLUSION: In terminally ill AE-IPF patients, opioids are usually administered when the recovery is deemed impossible, and EOLd are rarely held before the onset of AE. Further studies are warranted on the efficacy of opioids for dyspnea and the appropriate timing of EOLd.

Prognostic Awareness and Discussions of Incurability in Patients with Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Caregivers: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with advanced cancer often have poor prognostic awareness, the most effective communication approach for improving prognostic awareness is unclear. In addition, the association between prognostic awareness and preferences for future medical treatment remains unexplored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of consecutive patients with advanced or post-operative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed after first-line chemotherapy, and their caregivers. We evaluated patterns of clinical discussions about incurability, prognostic awareness, and preference for future medical treatment at baseline and 3 months later. RESULTS: We obtained 200 valid responses to the questionnaires at baseline and 147 valid responses 3 months later. In addition, 180 caregivers returned valid responses. A total of 54% of patients and 51% of caregivers had accurate awareness at baseline, and 52% of patients had accurate awareness 3 months later. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that patients who were informed about incurability in recent and past discussions were significantly more likely to have accurate awareness 3 months later, compared with those who were only informed recently (adjusted odds ratio 5.08; 95% CI, 1.31-19.78; P = .019). Accurate awareness at 3 months was significantly negatively associated with preference for life-prolonging treatment at 3 months after adjusting for covariates (adjusted odds ratio 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.90; P = .028). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced cancer who had both recent and past discussions about incurability with their oncologists have more accurate prognostic awareness. Improving prognostic awareness could reduce the preference for life-prolonging treatment.

Social determinants of willingness to discuss end-of-life care with family and doctors among Korean American immigrants: Findings from a cross-sectional survey in Alabama.

Prior research reported lower engagement in end-of-life discussions and planning among Korean American (KA) immigrants; however, there is a dearth of research investigating factors associated with their willingness to discuss their end-of-life care wishes. This study aimed to examine the willingness to have end-of-life discussions with family and doctors among KA immigrants and social determinants of health (SDH) associated with willingness. A self-administered, cross-sectional survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 259 KA immigrants recruited from two counties in Alabama. Demographic, health, acculturation and SDH information were collected. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between SDH and willingness for end-of-life discussion with family and doctors, respectively. The majority of the sample was willing to discuss end-of-life care with family (94%) and doctors (82%). Those with hospice awareness were more likely to have willingness for discussion with family (OR = 27.70, p < 0.001) and doctors (OR = 5.01, p < 0.001). Those who could not see a doctor because of cost (OR = 0.03, p < 0.01) and who had higher threats to interpersonal safety (OR = 0.74, p < 0.05) were less likely to have willingness for discussion with family. Those who had more chronic conditions (OR = 0.60, p < 0.05) and higher levels of social isolation (OR = 0.77, p < 0.05) were less likely to have willingness for discussion with doctors. The SDH identified in this study should be considered in developing interventions to promote end-of-life discussions in the KA immigrant community. Future research should investigate the associations explored in this study in a larger and more representative sample.

Assessing the need for a question prompt list that encourages end-of-life discussions between patients with advanced cancer and their physicians: A focus group interview study.

OBJECTIVE: Early integration of palliative and cancer care improves the quality of life and is facilitated by discussions about the end of life after cessation of active cancer treatment between patients with advanced cancer and their physicians. However, both patients and physicians find end-of-life discussions challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the need for a question prompt list (QPL) that encourages end-of-life discussions between patients with advanced cancer and their physicians. METHODS: Focus group interviews (FGIs) were conducted with 18 participants comprising 5 pancreatic cancer patients, 3 family caregivers, 4 bereaved family members, and 6 physicians. Three themes were discussed: question items that should be included in the QPL that encourages end-of-life discussions with patients, family caregivers, and physicians after cessation of active cancer treatment; when the QPL should be provided; and who should provide the QPL. Each interview was audio-recorded, and content analysis was performed. RESULTS: The following 9 categories, with 57 question items, emerged from the FGIs: (1) preparing for the end of life, (2) treatment decision-making, (3) current and future quality of life, (4) current and future symptom management, (5) information on the transition to palliative care services, (6) coping with cancer, (7) caregivers' role, (8) psychological care, and (9) continuity of cancer care. Participants felt that the physician in charge of the patient's care and other medical staff should provide the QPL early during active cancer treatment. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Data were collected to develop a QPL that encourages end-of-life discussions between patients with advanced cancer and their physicians.

Willingness to Discuss End-of-Life Care Wishes Among Rural Black/African American Residents of the Alabama Black Belt.

Willingness for end-of-life discussion and related factors among rural Blacks/African Americans of the Alabama Black Belt have not been well-studied. This study aims to assess their willingness for the discussion and examine its relationship with social determinants of health (SDH) and demographic factors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a convenience sampling of 182 participants. Most participants were willing to discuss end-of-life wishes with family (77.1%) or doctors (72.1%). Controlling for demographics, results from binary logistic regressions showed those with hospice awareness were more likely to have willingness for discussion with family (OR = 10.07, p < .01) and doctors (OR = 7.23, p < .05). Those who were older (50+) were less likely to have willingness for discussion with doctors (OR = 0.19, p < .05), whereas those who were more socially isolated were less likely to have willingness for discussion with family (OR = 0.53, p < .05). Therefore, end-of-life discussion efforts should focus on older, socially isolated individuals and consider hospice awareness.

End-of-Life Communication in the Emergency Department: The Emergency Physicians' Perspectives.

Introduction: End-of-life (EOL) conditions are commonly encountered by emergency physicians (EP). We aim to explore EPs' experience and perspectives toward EOL discussions in acute settings. Methods: A qualitative survey was conducted among EPs in three tertiary institutions. Data on demographics, EOL knowledge, conflict management strategies, comfort level, and perceived barriers to EOL discussions were collected. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and SAS. Results: Of 63 respondents, 40 (63.5%) were male. Respondents comprised 22 senior residents/registrars, 9 associate consultants, 22 consultants, and 10 senior consultants. The median duration of emergency department practice was 8 (interquartile range: 6-10) years. A majority (79.3%) reported conducting EOL discussions daily to weekly, with most (90.5%) able to obtain general agreement with families and patients regarding goals of care. Top barriers were communications with family/clinicians, lack of understanding of palliative care, and lack of rapport with patients. 38 (60.3%) deferred discussions to other colleagues (e.g., intensivists), 10 (15.9%) involved more family members, and 13 (20.6%) employed a combination of approaches. Physician's comfort level in discussing EOL issues also differed with physician seniority and patient type. There was a positive correlation between the mean general comfort level when discussing EOL and the seniority of the EPs up till consultancy. However, the comfort level dropped among senior consultants as compared to consultants. EPs were most comfortable discussing EOL of patients with a known terminal illness and least comfortable in cases of sudden death. Conclusions: Formal training and standardized framework would be useful to enhance the competency of EPs in conducting EOL discussions.

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance in the Cancer Experience (PEACE) questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance in the Cancer Experience questionnaire (PEACE-J) and to evaluate the association between the PEACE subscales and Japanese patient characteristics. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among 412 patients with cancer. This survey assessed medical and demographic factors, such as the PEACE, the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp). The forward-backward translation method was used to develop the PEACE-J. The validity of PEACE-J was evaluated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation analysis between each subscale of PEACE and FACIT-Sp and CISS. The Cronbach's α and the item-total correlation of each subscale of the PEACE questionnaire were calculated to assess internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: The factor analysis yielded two subscales corresponding to the original version: Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.84 and 0.86 for the Peaceful Acceptance of Illness subscale and the Struggle with Illness subscale, respectively. The PEACE subscales and the FACIT-Sp subscales and the CISS subscales were moderately associated with each other, including the Peaceful Acceptance to each subscale of FACIT (r = 0.22-0.55, p < 0.01); and the Peaceful Acceptance and the Struggle with Illness to CISS emotion-oriented coping (r = -0.36 and r = 0.45, p < 0.01, respectively). Married patients showed higher levels of peaceful acceptance than unmarried patients (p < 0.001). Poorer performance status, chemotherapy use, and recurrence or metastasis were significantly associated with higher levels of struggle with illness (p < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This study indicated that the PEACE-J is a valid and reliable measure of the patient's sense of acceptance, calmness or equanimity, and peace, as well as their sense of struggle or desperation concerning their illness.

Effect of advance care planning discussions with trained nurses in older adults with chronic diseases in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) discussions are often procrastinated due to both physician and patient factors. However, ACP should be started earlier, to provide more time for reviewing one's values and discussing them with loved ones and medical professionals. This study examined the effectiveness of ACP discussions with health care providers held among older adults with chronic diseases. METHODS: This was a non-randomized controlled trial among chronically ill people aged 65 years and older. A 6-month follow-up was conducted in the intervention group, in which participants had ACP discussions with trained nurses (n=115), and the control group, in which participants did not discuss ACP (n=115). Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at 6 months, to examine knowledge, ACP readiness and self-efficacy, and comprehensive quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: A total of 200 participants were included in the analysis. The mean age of participants was 69.6 years. There was only a small change in knowledge scores before and after the intervention, with no significant difference between the two groups. ACP engagement was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group at 6 months (P=0.016). Comprehensive QoL was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders using multiple regression analysis, there was still an association between those higher scores and the intervention (P=0.01, P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that older adults with chronic diseases can have better communication with their families and health care providers and a higher QoL if they engage in ACP discussions with trained nurses at an early stage.

A descriptive analysis of end-of-life discussions for high-grade glioma patients.

BACKGROUND: End-of-life discussions (EOLDs) in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) have not been well described. Therefore, this study examined the appropriateness of timing and the extent of patient involvement in EOLDs and their impact on HGG patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 105 bereaved families of HGG patients at a university hospital in Japan between July and August 2019. Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to assess the association between patient participation in EOLDs and their outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 77 questionnaires were returned (response rate 73%), of which 20 respondents replied with refusal documents. Overall, 31/57 (54%) participated in EOLDs at least once in acute hospital settings, and a significant difference was observed between participating and nonparticipating groups in communicating the patient's wishes for EOL care to the family (48% vs 8%, P = .001). Moreover, >80% of respondents indicated that the initiation of EOLDs during the early diagnosis period with patients and families was appropriate. Most EOLDs were provided by neurosurgeons (96%), and other health care providers rarely participated. Additionally, patient goals and priorities were discussed in only 28% of the EOLDs. Patient participation in EOLDs was not associated with the quality of EOL care and a good death. CONCLUSIONS: Although participation in EOLDs is relatively challenging for HGG patients, this study showed that participation in EOLDs may enable patients to express their wishes regarding EOL care. It is important to initiate EOLDs early on through an interdisciplinary team approach while respecting patient goals and priorities.

Patient participation and associated factors in the discussions on do-not-attempt-resuscitation and end-of-life disclosure: a retrospective chart review study.

BACKGROUND: Patient participation is a key foundation of advance care planning (ACP). However, a patient himself/herself may be left out from sensitive conversations such as end-of-life (EOL) care discussions. The objectives of this study were to investigate patients' participation rate in the discussion of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) / Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) order, and in the discussion that the patient is at his/her EOL stage (EOL disclosure), and to explore their associated factors. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review study. The participants were all the patients who were hospitalized and died in a university-affiliated teaching hospital (tertiary medical facility) in central Tokyo, Japan during the period from April 2018 to March 2019. The following patients were excluded: (1) cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival; (2) stillbirth; (3) under 18 years old at the time of death; and (4) refusal by their bereaved family. Presence or absence of CPR/DNAR discussion and EOL disclosure, patients' involvement in those discussions, and their associated factors were investigated. RESULTS: CPR/DNAR discussions were observed in 336 out of the 358 patients (93.9%). However, 224 of these discussions were carried out without a patient (patient participation rate 33.3%). Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 2.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-4.25]), living alone (OR = 2.51 [1.34-4.71]), and 1 year or more from the date of diagnosis (OR = 1.78 [1.03-3.10]) were associated with higher patient's participation in CPR/DNAR discussions. The EOL disclosure was observed in 341 out of the 358 patients (95.3%). However, 170 of the discussions were carried out without the patient (patient participation rate 50.1%). Patients who died of cancer (OR = 2.41[1.45-4.03]) and patients without mental illness (OR=2.41 [1.11-5.25]) were more likely to participate in EOL disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical sample, only up to half of the patients participated in CPR/DNAR discussions and EOL disclosure. Female, living with family, a shorter period from the diagnosis, non-cancer, and mental illness presence are risk factors for lack of patients' participation in CPR/DNAR or EOL discussions. Further attempts to facilitate patients' participation, based on their preference, are warranted.

Current Status of Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Communication for Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is a process that supports adults in understanding and sharing their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. We examined the current status of ACP and end-of-life (EOL) communication between oncologists and patients with metastatic breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey among 41 institutions that specialize in oncology by using an online tool in October 2019. Participants (118 physicians) from 38 institutions completed a 39-item questionnaire that measured facility type and function; physicians' background and clinical approach, education about EOL communication, and understanding about ACP; and the current situation of ACP and EOL discussions. RESULTS: Ninety-eight responses concerning physicians' engagement in ACP with patients were obtained. Seventy-one (72%) answered that they had engaged in ACP. Among these, 23 (33%) physicians used a structured format to facilitate the conversation in their institutions, and only 6 (8%) settled triggers or sentinel events for the initiation of ACP. In the multivariable analysis, only the opportunity to learn communication skills was associated with physicians' engagement with ACP (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-7.0). The frequency and timing of communication about ACP and EOL care with patients substantially varied among the oncologists. Communication about patients' life expectancy was less frequent compared with other topics. CONCLUSION: The opportunity to improve EOL communication skills promoted physicians' engagement with ACP among patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer. However, there were still substantial variabilities in the method, frequency, and timing of ACP and EOL communication among the oncologists. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study found that the opportunity to improve end-of-life (EOL) communication skills promoted physicians' engagement in advance care planning (ACP) among patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer. All oncologists who treat said patients are encouraged to participate in effective education programs concerning EOL communication skills. In clinical practice, there are substantial variabilities in the method, frequency, and timing of ACP and EOL communication among oncologists. As recommended in several clinical guidelines, the authors suggest a system that identifies patients who require conversations about their care goals, a structured format to facilitate the conversations, and continuous measurement for improving EOL care and treatment.

Caregiving Experience and Other Factors Associated With Having End-Of-Life Discussions: A Cross-Sectional Study of a General Japanese Population.

CONTEXT: The factors associated with end-of-life discussion (EOLD) are not well elucidated; an understanding of these factors may help facilitate EOLD. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations between EOLD and experiences of the death of and/or care for a loved one and other factors. METHODS: Data from a nationwide anonymous questionnaire survey of public attitudes toward end-of-life medical care, conducted in December 2017 in Japan, were used. Participants were randomly selected from the general population (age ≥ 20 years), and respondents who completed the questionnaire were analyzed (respondents: n = 836; effective response rate: 13.9%). Respondents were divided into two groups based on their experience of EOLD: those who had engaged in EOLD and those who had not. The main predictors were the experiences of the death of and care for a loved one. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 836 respondents (male: 55.6%, aged 65 and over: 43.5%), 43.7% reported their engagement in EOLD. In the analyses, "having experience of caring for a loved one" was associated with EOLD compared with never having experience (odds ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.64). However, having experience of the death of a loved one had no association. CONCLUSION: For health-care providers, it may be worth recognizing that the care experience of their patient's caregiver might affect the caregiver's own EOLD in the future.

Physicians' Perceptions and Suggestions for the Adaptation of a US-Based Serious Illness Communication Training in a Non-US Culture: A Qualitative Study.

CONTEXT: US-based serious illness communication training pedagogy has not been well studied outside of the United States. OBJECTIVES: To explore the perception of a US-based, serious illness communication training pedagogy in a non-US culture and to identify aspects requiring cultural adaptations. METHODS: In September 2019, we conducted a qualitative study using convenient sampling at two urban, academic medical centers in Tokyo, Japan. Semistructured interviews were conducted to Japanese physicians who participated in the four-hour VitalTalk training in Japanese. We explored six majored themes: 1) global impression of the training; 2) main goals from participation; 3) appropriateness of didactics; 4) role play experiences; 5) take away points from the training; and 6) changes in their own communication practice after the training. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using phenomenological approach. RESULTS: All 24 participants found the VitalTalk pedagogy novel and beneficial, stressing the importance of demonstrating empathy, reflecting on own skills, and recognizing the importance of feedback that emphasizes the use of specific words. Participants also pointed out that Japanese patients generally do not express their strong emotions explicitly. CONCLUSION: Our study found empirical evidence that the VitalTalk pedagogy is perceived to be novel and beneficial in a non-US cultural setting. Cultural adaptations in expression and response to emotion may be required to maximize its efficacy in Japan. To meet the needs of clinical practice in Japan, further studies are needed to empirically test the suggested refinements for the VitalTalk pedagogy.

Barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patient as perceived by oncologists, certified/specialized nurses in cancer nursing and medical social workers.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to identify barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patients and their families as perceived by oncologists, certified/specialized nurses in cancer nursing (hereafter, collectively referred to as 'nurses') and medical social workers, as well as to clarify their opinions about effective strategies to facilitate end-of-life discussion. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was distributed to 4354 medical professionals working at 402 designated regional cancer hospitals in Japan. Responses were obtained from 494 oncologists (valid response rate 30.7%), 993 nurses (46.7%) and 387 medical social workers (48.1%). RESULTS: Among the barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patients, factors related to patients and families, such as 'Family members' difficulty accepting loved one's poor prognosis', were recognized as the most important issues, which was the common view shared across the three types of medical professionals who participated in this study. Nurses and medical social workers were significantly more likely than oncologists to recognize as important issues 'Health care team disagreement about goals of care' and 'Lack of training to have conversations for end-of-life discussion'. To facilitate end-of-life discussion, 'providing mental and emotional support for the patients and their families after end-of-life discussion' was needed most as perceived by the respondents regardless of their profession. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers impeding end-of-life discussion were factors related to patients and their families, and oncologists' close cooperation with nurses and medical social workers is important in providing emotional support for patients and families. To facilitate end-of-life discussion, it is important to share information on patients' prognosis and goals for treatment among oncologists and other medical professionals, as well as strengthen communication skill of these medical professions.