Clinical analysis of 13 cases of pediatric membranous duodenal stenosis treated with endoscopic radial incision (with video) / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision (ERI) for congenital membranous duodenal stenosis (MDS).Methods:The clinical data of 13 children with MDS receiving ERI in the Department of Gastroenterology of Xi'an Children's Hospital from May 2017 to December 2021 were reviewed and analyzed. The perioperative management, surgical procedures, postoperative complications and follow-up were summarized.Results:There were 5 boys and 8 girls with a median disease duration of 8 (2-20) months, and the median age of diagnosis was 13 months (5-30 months). The septum of 10 cases (10/13) was located in the descending part of the duodenum, and that of 3 cases (3/13) in the horizontal part. The papilla of 1 case (1/13) opened on the septum, that of 3 cases (3/13) within 5 cm of the mouth side of the septum, and that of 9 cases (9/13) within 5 cm of the anal side of the septum. The median diameter of the septal aperture was 3 mm (2-6 mm). All 13 children successfully underwent ERI with a median operation time of 20 min (15-32 min). The average surgical incision was 3 strokes (2-4 strokes), and the endoscope with outer diameter 9.9 mm could pass stenosis after ERI. The median incision diameter was 10 mm (10-12 mm). All patients achieved relief of clinical symptoms after ERI. One patient (1/13) suffered from the postoperative delayed bleeding, which was stopped by endoscopic titanium clamping. No intestinal perforation or duodenal papilla injury occurred, and median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (5-10 days). The upper gastrointestinal angiogram and gastroscopy were repeated 3 months after ERI, and the median diameter of stenosis was 12 mm (10-15 mm), which was significantly dilated compared with before. The mean body weight increase at 1 month after ERI was 1.20 kg (0.50-1.80 kg), and the mean body weight increase at 3 months was 3.50 kg (2.50-4.00 kg), which reached the normal body weight of the same age.Conclusion:ERI is safe and effective for the treatment of MDS in children, and shows good clinical application and promotion value.

Efficacy of a patient with scar constitution combined with corrosive esophageal strictures after different endoscopic therapies.

Oral corrosive substances can cause esophageal or gastrointestinal strictures, leading to malnutrition and gastrointestinal dysfunction, directly affecting the patients' quality of life. The aim of the case was to compare the efficacy of different endoscopic therapy methods.

Endoscopic radial incision to treat a congenital esophageal stenosis in a 10-year-old child

A 10-year-old boy was admitted to our hospital because of frequent vomiting and impaired growth. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed there was a benign annular stenosis (diameter 0.6 cm) of the middle esophagus. Then, using an ultrafine painless gastroscope, we observed that the narrowed segment was approximately 2.0 cm in length. The stenosis of the esophagus was diagnosed as congenital esophageal stenosis (CES). Then，the patient was referred for endoscopic radial incision (ERI) under general anesthesia. We used an insulated-tip knife to perform ERI. A radial incision was made to cut the muscle layer along the line that connects the esophageal lumen on the oral side and the lumen on the anal side in the 3 and 6 o’clock directions . The diameter of the esophagus was approximately 1.0 cm post-operation. The gastroscopy was able to pass through smoothly. The operation time was approximately 30 minutes. The child’s oral liquid diet started on postoperative day 1 and was discontinued on postoperative day 4. Vomiting was significantly relieved for the patient. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were detected. An endoscopy performed 3 months post-operation showed smooth esophageal mucosa, and the diameter of the esophageal lumen increased to approximately 1.0 cm without recurrent stenosis. (AU)

Endoscopic radial incision versus endoscopic balloon dilation as initial treatments of benign esophageal anastomotic stricture.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision (ERI) versus endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) treatment of naïve, recurrent, and refractory benign esophageal anastomotic strictures. METHODS: One hundred and one ERI, 145 EBD, and 42 ERI combined with EBD sessions were performed in 136 consecutive patients with benign esophageal anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy at Zhongshan Hospital from January 2016 to August 2021. Baseline characteristics, operational procedures, and clinical outcomes data were retrospectively evaluated. Parameters and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between ERI and EBD in patients with naïve or recurrent or refractory strictures. Risk factors for re-stricture after ERI were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine ERI versus 68 EBD sessions were performed for naïve stricture, 26 ERI versus 60 EBD for recurrent strictures, and 46 ERI versus 17 EBD for refractory stricture. With comparable baseline characteristics, RFS was greater in the ERI than the EBD group for naïve strictures (P = 0.0449). The ERI group had a lower 12-month re-stricture rate than the EBD group (37.9% vs 61.8%, P = 0.0309) and a more prolonged patency time (181.5 ± 263.1 vs 74.5 ± 82.0, P = 0.0233). Between the two interventions, recurrent and refractory strictures had similar RFS (P = 0.0598; P = 0.7668). Multivariate analysis revealed initial ERI treatment was an independent predictive factor for lower re-stricture risk after ERI intervention (odds ratio = 0.047, P = 0.001). Few adverse events were observed after ERI or EBD (3.0% vs 2.1%, P = 0.6918). CONCLUSIONS: ERI is associated with lower re-stricture rates with better patency and RFS compared with EBD for naive strictures.

Modified endoscopic radial incision and cutting method (M-RIC) for the treatment of refractory esophageal stricture.

BACKGROUND: Refractory esophageal stricture is difficult to deal with. Some refractory stricture shows little response to now-existing endoscopic techniques. We assessed the efficacy of modified endoscopic radial incision and cutting method (M-RIC) for the treatment of refractory esophageal stricture. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients with refractory esophageal stricture who underwent M-RIC or dilation from June 2016 to June 2020 were included. Outcomes measured included technical and clinical success, restenosis rate, time to restenosis and complications. Risk factors for restenosis after M-RIC were assessed. RESULTS: 67 patients were enrolled (M-RIC group, n = 29; dilation group, n = 38). After propensity score matching, each group include 28 patients. There were no significant differences in technical success (96.4% vs 100%, p = 1.00) or clinical success (89.3% vs 100%, p = 0.23) between groups. Patients in M-RIC group had lower rates of restenosis (75% vs. 100%, p = 0.02) and longer time to restenosis (110 days vs 31.5 days, p = 0.00) compared with dilation group. 4 patients did not require any additional treatment after M-RIC and maintained food intake until the end of follow-up. Complications of M-RIC include perforation, fever and retrosternal pain, and no difference was found in total complication rate when compared with dilation group (25% vs 7.1%, p = 0.07). Although 3 out of 28 patients (10.7%) in M-RIC group had perforation, the perforation rate was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.11). Multivariate analyze suggested stricture length ≥ 5 cm (HR 7.25, p = 0.00) was a risk factor to restenosis while oral prednisone (HR 0.29, p = 0.02) was associated with preventing restenosis after M-RIC. CONCLUSION: M-RIC is a feasible and effective technique for refractory esophageal stricture with lower rate and longer time to restenosis. Stricture length ≥ 5 cm is a risk factor to restenosis while oral prednisone is helpful in remitting restenosis after M-RIC.

Endoscopic radial incision method for two strictures of the esophagus after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The development of severe esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal carcinoma is not uncommon. Dilation by Savary-Gilliard dilators or balloon dilators is the first-line treatment for such complex refractory benign stricture, but it has a high risk of treatment failure. So far, endoscopic radial incision (ERI) as a new technology for the treatment of post-ESD esophageal stricture has been rarely reported. We report a case, which we designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ERI technology for two severe strictures of the esophagus after ESD. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old man had suffered from two complex refractory benign strictures of the esophagus after ESD for early esophageal carcinoma. The patient was refractory to multiple endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) therapy previously. Thus, the patient underwent ERI successfully and without postoperative complications such as fever, poststernal pain, bleeding, and perforation. During 3 months of follow-up after ERI, the patient had no recurrence of dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Refractory strictures of the esophagus after ESD are common. ERI is a safe and efficient strategy for treating such multiple refractory esophageal strictures.

Evaluation of endoscopic radial incision for benign esophageal stenosis in children / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision ( ERI) for treatment of benign esophageal stenosis in children. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of 20 children with benign esophageal stenosis who underwent ERI from January 2013 to May 2018 in Xi′an Children′s Hospital. The procedure, improvement of clinical symptoms, and complications related to the operation were analyzed. Results All 20 patients were successfully treated with ERI, with median operation time of 10 min (5-25 min), and median number of narrow ring incision of 4 times (1-8 times) . No fever, poststernal pain, bleeding or perforation was found in any child after operation. The hospital stay was 4-7 days, with a median of 4. 5 days. The postoperative follow-up was 3-24 months, with an average of 7. 9 months. At one month after operation, the stenosis diameter of 20 cases was enlarged[ 1. 0 cm ( 0. 6-1. 5 cm) VS 0. 3 cm ( 0. 1-0. 5 cm) , t=11. 018, P<0. 001] , and dysphagia score was lower[ 0 ( 0-2) VS 2. 5 (2-4), Z=4. 027, P<0. 001] compared with that before. The median weight of 19 children increased by 2 kg ( 1-4 kg ) three months after operation. There was no significant correlation between improvement of dysphagia after ERI and sex, age, times of preoperative treatment and diameter of stenosis ( all P>0. 05) , but there was a negative correlation between improvement of dysphagia after ERI and the length of stenosis ( r=-0. 514, P=0. 020) . Conclusion ERI is safe and effective for treatment of benign esophageal stenosis in children, which can be recommended in clinic.

Management of strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer.

Endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer has a high therapeutic effect while being minimally invasive. Especially, the establishment of the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure has made it possible to resect large lesions in an en-bloc manner. As a result, accurate pathology evaluation became possible, and the risk of local recurrence was extremely low. On the other hand, esophageal strictures after endoscopic treatment of an extensive circumferential lesion are a potential problem. Previously, for the prevention and treatment of esophageal strictures, patients had to undergo painful endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) many times. It is, however, associated with complications (perforation, bleeding, etc.). For this, oral intake and/or a local injection of steroids were given and EBD sessions were less frequently or even unnecessarily performed. Furthermore, oral mucosa epithelial cell sheet transplantation and biodegradable stents are applied for controlling post-ESD stricture. Nevertheless, EBD was still the treatment option for refractory cases of stenosis. Recently, endoscopic radial incision and cutting methods have been applied to esophageal post-procedural strictures and even for anastomotic strictures following surgery. Thus, it is now becoming possible to treat circumferential lesions with ESD and to control the resultant stenosis.

Endoscopic radial incision in patients with benign stricture of esophageal anastomosis / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision( ERI) for benign stricture of esophageal anastomosis. Methods Clinical data of 17 patients with benign stricture of e?sophageal anastomosis undergoing ERI from October 2013 to September 2014 were retrospectively studied. Im?provement of clinical symptom and treatment?related complication or discomfort were intensively analysed. Re?sults All 17 patients successfully received ERI procedures, and the mean operating time was 10 minutes with a mean of 4 incisions. Obvious bleeding and mis?cut of normal mucosa occurred in 1 case, and this patient was cured by endoscopic hemostasis, gastrointestinal decompression and administration of antibiotics. Heartburn oc?curred in 5 patients and disappeared spontaneously without other complications or discomfort. Dysphagia score decreased from 3?11 to 0?90 in the second day after ERI(P0?05 ) . Conclusion ERI is simple, safe and effective for treating benign stricture of esophageal anastomosis.

Efficacy of endoscopic radial incision (ERI) for benign stricture of upper digestive system / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic radial incision (ERI) for benign stricture of upper digestive system. Methods Patients with benign esophageal or gastric stricture (including anastomotic stricture, stricture after ESD and caustic stricture) were enrolled in this study. The stage of stricture, length of the lesion and the thickness of the scar were recorded. ERI (maybe associated with balloon dilatation) were performed. Post-opera-tive symptoms, complications and follow-up were also recorded. Results 7 patients were enrolled and all received ERI, and 4 additional balloon dilatation were done. Dysphagia in all patients relieved. 1 case with hemorrhage oc-curred and relieved with conservative treatment. Majority of the patients got long-term remission after 1~2 times of ERI. Conclusion ERI is safe and effective for benign stricture of upper digestive system. It may prolong the dyspha-gia-free period, worth clinical promotion.