Interaction between body mass index and family history of cancer on the risk of female breast cancer.

Both body mass index (BMI) and family history of cancer are established risk factors for female breast cancer. However, few studies explored the potential interaction between both factors. We assessed the association of BMI and its interaction with family cancer history on the risk of female breast cancer in Shanghai, China. Based on a population-based prospective cohort study started from 2008 to 2012 with 15,055 Chinese female participants in Minhang district, Shanghai. Cox regression models were used to estimate the association of BMI and its interaction with a family history of cancer on breast cancer risk. The additive interaction was evaluated by the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and the attributable proportion due to interaction (AP), and the multiplicative interaction was assessed by the product term (BMI* family history of cancer) in the Cox regression model. Compared with BMI of < 24 kg/m2 and no family history of cancer, women with BMI of ≥ 24 kg/m2 and a family history of cancer had a higher risk for breast cancer with HR 2.06 (95% CI 1.39, 3.06). There was an additive interaction between BMI and family history of cancer on breast cancer incidence, with the RERI being 0.29 (95% CI 0.08, 0.51) and the AP being 0.37 (95% CI 0.08, 0.66). The coexistence of obesity and cancer family history may exacerbate breast cancer incidence risk, highlighting the importance of weight management in women with a family history of cancer.

Evaluation of Family and Community Social Network Characteristics Among High-Risk Family Members to Improve Cancer-Related Health Behaviors.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of social network characteristics of individuals with a family history of cancer on the use of cancer-related services (e.g., screening, genetic counseling/testing). SAMPLE & SETTING: 170 family members of individuals with the most common hereditary or familial cancers. METHODS & VARIABLES: Data collection occurred between March and September 2021 using an online survey. RESULTS: Having strong within-immediate family relationships and family members who underwent more screening procedures was associated with increased breast cancer screening, and having more family members with cancer was associated with colorectal cancer screening. Having a large family, having family members who underwent screening for more cancers, and having strong social cohesion among families were associated with an increased rate of genetic testing. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses working with families affected by cancer should focus on strategies to strengthen relationships among family members to improve knowledge of cancer screening and available genetic services.

Cancer risk in relatives of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The spectrum and risk of cancer in relatives of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in the Chinese population have not been established. METHODS: A family history of cancer in 9903 unselected breast cancer patients was retrospectively analyzed. BRCA1/2 status was determined for all patients and relative risks (RRs) were calculated to evaluate cancer risk in relatives of the patients. RESULTS: The incidences of breast cancer in female relatives of BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers were 33.0%, 32.2%, and 7.7%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of ovarian cancer were 11.5%, 2.4%, and 0.5%, respectively. The incidences of pancreatic cancer in male relatives of BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers were 1.4%, 2.7%, and 0.6%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of prostate cancer were 1.0%, 2.1%, and 0.4%, respectively. The risks of breast and ovarian cancers in female relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers were significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers (BRCA1: RR = 4.29, P < 0.001 and RR = 21.95, P < 0.001; BRCA2: RR = 4.19, P < 0.001 and RR = 4.65, P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, higher risks of pancreatic and prostate cancers were noted in male relatives of BRCA2 carriers than non-carriers (RR = 4.34, P = 0.001 and RR = 4.86, P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Female relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers, and male relatives of BRCA2 carriers are at increased risk for pancreatic and prostate cancers.

Family history of cancer is associated with poorer prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the family history of cancer (FHC) in predicting survival and clinicopathological features in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-institution study utilized data from 610 patients undergoing surgery from 2014 to 2020 that was prospectively collected and cataloged for research purposes. All patients underwent standard surgery with/without radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. We statistically evaluated whether FHC was associated with changes in disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: Among 610 patients, 141 (23.1%) reported a family history of cancer. The distribution of clinicopathological characteristics was balanced between FHC-positive and FHC-negative OSCC patients. FHC-positive patients had decreased DFS (p = 0.005) and DSS (p = 0.018) compared to FHC-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: FHC-positive OSCC patients have a poorer prognosis. FHC positivity is an independent predictor of negative outcomes based on DFS and DSS. FHC should be a consideration in screening, evaluating, counseling, and treating OSCC patients.

Gene Mutations Associated With Clinical Characteristics in the Tumors of Patients With Breast Cancer.

Background: Clinical characteristics including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) are important biomarkers in the treatment of breast cancer, but how genomic mutations affect their status is rarely studied. This study aimed at finding genomic mutations associated with these clinical characteristics. Methods: There were 160 patients with breast cancer enrolled in this study. Samples from those patients were used for next-generation sequencing, targeting a panel of 624 pan-cancer genes. Short nucleotide mutations, copy number variations, and gene fusions were identified for each sample. Fisher's exact test compared each pair of genes. A similarity score was constructed with the resulting P-values. Genes were clustered with the similarity scores. The identified gene clusters were compared to the status of clinical characteristics including ER, PR, HER2, and a family history of cancer (FH) in terms of the mutations in patients. Results: Gene-by-gene analysis found that CCND1 mutations were positively correlated with ER status while ERBB2 and CDK12 mutations were positively correlated with HER2 status. Mutation-based clustering identified four gene clusters. Gene cluster 1 (ADGRA2, ZNF703, FGFR1, KAT6A, and POLB) was significantly associated with PR status; gene cluster 2 (COL1A1, AXIN2, ZNF217, GNAS, and BRIP1) and gene cluster 3 (FGF3, FGF4, FGF19, and CCND1) were significantly associated with ER status; gene cluster 2 was also negatively associated with a family history of cancer; and gene cluster 4 was significantly negatively associated with age. Patients were classified into four corresponding groups. Patient groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 had 24.1%, 36.5%, 38.7%, and 41.3% of patients with an FDA-recognized biomarker predictive of response to an FDA-approved drug, respectively. Conclusion: This study identified genomic mutations positively associated with ER and PR status. These findings not only revealed candidate genes in ER and PR status maintenance but also provided potential treatment targets for patients with endocrine therapy resistance.

High familial burden of cancer correlates with improved outcome from immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC independent of somatic DNA damage response gene status.

Family history of cancer (FHC) is a hallmark of cancer risk and an independent predictor of outcome, albeit with uncertain biologic foundations. We previously showed that FHC-high patients experienced prolonged overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. To validate our findings in patients with NSCLC, we evaluated two multicenter cohorts of patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving either first-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy. From each cohort, 607 patients were randomly case-control matched accounting for FHC, age, performance status, and disease burden. Compared to FHC-low/negative, FHC-high patients experienced longer OS (HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.46-0.95], p = 0.0281), PFS (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.48-0.89]; p = 0.0074) and higher disease control rates (DCR, 86.4% vs 67.5%, p = 0.0096), within the pembrolizumab cohort. No significant associations were found between FHC and OS/PFS/DCR within the chemotherapy cohort. We explored the association between FHC and somatic DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations as underlying mechanism to our findings in a parallel cohort of 118 NSCLC, 16.9% of whom were FHC-high. The prevalence of ≥ 1 somatic DDR gene mutation was 20% and 24.5% (p = 0.6684) in FHC-high vs. FHC-low/negative, with no differences in tumor mutational burden (6.0 vs. 7.6 Mut/Mb, p = 0.6018) and tumor cell PD-L1 expression. FHC-high status identifies NSCLC patients with improved outcomes from pembrolizumab but not chemotherapy, independent of somatic DDR gene status. Prospective studies evaluating FHC alongside germline genetic testing are warranted.

Examining the roles of fatalism, stigma, and risk perception on cancer information seeking and avoidance among Chinese adults in Hong Kong.

To examine how cancer fatalism, stigma, and risk perception influence information seeking and avoidance among Chinese adults in Hong Kong.We administered an online survey to 616 Hong Kong Chinese adults using quota sampling and analyzed the data using structural equation modeling.Fatalism was positively associated with susceptibility (ß = .25, p < .001), severity (ß = .11, p = .03), and fear (ß = .17, p < .001), while stigma was negatively associated with severity (ß = -.22, p < .001). Severity (ß = -.19, p < .001) was negatively associated but fear was positively associated with cancer information avoidance (ß = .14, p = .01).Public health communication and education on cancer risks among ethnic Chinese communities in Hong Kong should be sensitive and address underlying cultural beliefs and views that may impede active information seeking.

Family history of cancer is a prognostic factor for better survival in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

Lay summary: Patients with a family history of cancer, especially digestive tract cancer and esophageal cancer, a family history of cancer in the first degree, and more than one relative affected by cancer were associated with favorable survival when compared to those without a family history of cancer. Precis for use in the Table of Contents: A family history of cancer is a favorable independent prognostic factor in ESCC. Patients with a family history of cancer, especially digestive tract cancer and esophageal cancer, a family history of cancer in the first degree, and more than one relative affected by cancer were associated with favorable survival when compared to those without a family history of cancer. Background: A family history of cancer (FH) is closely associated with the risk and survival of many cancers. However, the effect of FH on the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. We performed a large cohort study in the Chinese population to obtain insight into the prognostic value of FH in patients with operable ESCC. Methods: A total of 1,322 consecutive patients with thoracic ESCC who had undergone esophagectomy between January 1997 and December 2013 were included. The FH group included patients with any degree of FH, while the non-FH group included patients without any degree of FH. In total, 215 patients with FH and 215 without FH were matched using the propensity score matching analysis method to adjust for differences in baseline variables between the two groups. The impact of FH on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's proportional hazards models. Results: Before matching, 280 (21.2%) patients were included in the FH group and 1,042 (78.8%) in the non-FH group. FH was associated with early pathological T stage (p = 0.001), lymph node-negative status (p = 0.022), and early pathological stage (p = 0.006). After matching, FH was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS in ESCC patients. Patients with FH had 35% lower risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.84, p = 0.001) and 34% lower risk of death (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51-0.86, p = 0.002) than those without FH. Patients with a family history of digestive tract cancer (FH-DC), a family history of esophageal cancer (FH-EC), FH in first-degree relatives (FH-FD), and more than one relative affected by cancer were associated with favorable DFS and OS as compared to those without FH. Conclusion: FH is a favorable independent prognostic factor in ESCC. Patients with FH, especially those with FH-DC, FH-EC, FH-FD, and more than one relative affected by cancer, had improved survival.

Family history of cancer in first degree relatives and risk of cancer of unknown primary.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) refers to the presence of metastatic lesions, with no identifiable primary site during the patient's lifetime. Poor survival and lack of available treatment highlight the need to identify potential CUP risk factors. We investigated whether a family history of cancer is associated with increased CUP risk. METHODS: We performed a case cohort analysis using data from the Netherlands Cohort Study, which included a total of 963 CUP cases and 4,288 subcohort members. A Cox Proportional Hazards Regression was used to compare CUP risk in participants who reported to have a family member with cancer to those who did not, whilst adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: In general, we observed no increased CUP risk in those who reported a family history of cancer. CUP risk appeared slightly increased in those who reported cancer in a sibling (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.97-1.38), especially in those with a sister with cancer compared with those without (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.99-1.53), although these findings are not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Having a family history of cancer is not an independent risk factor of CUP.

First- and second-degree family history of ovarian and breast cancer in relation to risk of invasive ovarian cancer in African American and white women.

Family history (FH) of ovarian cancer and breast cancer are well-established risk factors for ovarian cancer, but few studies have examined this association in African American (AA) and white women by histotype. We assessed first- and second-degree FH of ovarian and breast cancer and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in the Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry Consortium. Analyses included 1052 AA cases, 2328 AA controls, 2380 white cases and 3982 white controls. Race-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multilevel logistic regression with adjustment for covariates. Analyses were stratified by histotype (high-grade serous vs others). First-degree FH of ovarian cancer was associated with high-grade serous carcinoma in AA (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.50, 3.59) and white women (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.82, 3.38). First-degree FH of breast cancer increased risk irrespective of histotype in AAs, but with high-grade serous carcinoma only in white women. Associations with second-degree FH of ovarian cancer were observed for overall ovarian cancer in white women and with high-grade serous carcinoma in both groups. First-degree FH of ovarian cancer and of breast cancer, and second-degree FH of ovarian cancer is strongly associated with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in AA and white women. The association of FH of breast cancer with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is similar in white women and AA women, but may differ for other histotypes.

Epidemiological analysis of family cancer history in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Dongguan City / 公共卫生与预防医学

Objective To study the epidemiological characteristics of family cancer history in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Dongguan city. Methods A total of 240 patients with nasopharyngeal cancer treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were selected for the investigation of family cancer history. The families of the patients were determined respectively, and the family cancer history of the first, second and third relatives was obtained. The incidence, population distribution and incidence factors were investigated and analyzed. Results A total of 7 918 primary, secondary and tertiary relatives of 240 cases were inquired. 188 cases were found to have cancer, including 118 cases of nasopharyngeal cancer and 70 cases of non-nasopharyngeal cancer (10 cases of digestive tract cancer, 18 cases of breast cancer, 20 cases of lymphoma and 22 cases of lung cancer). The incidence of familial cancer was higher in males (127/240) than in females (79/188). The main pathological type of family cancer was squamous cell carcinoma (109/188), accounting for 57.98%. Most of the patients in family cancer group were farmers (128/188), accounting for 68.09%; There was no significant difference in the prevalence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and non-nasopharyngeal carcinoma in relatives of different genders (χ2=0.11, χ2=0.23, P>0.05). The incidence of cancer in first-degree relatives of different genders was higher than that in second-degree relatives, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.26, χ2=5.62, P2 times per week), Epstein-Barr virus infection was significantly higher than that of the familial non-cancer group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.57, χ2=10.59, P<0.05). Conclusions The incidence of cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer in first-degree relatives is significantly higher than that in second-level and third-level relatives. The occurrence of nasopharyngeal cancer is the result of the combined action of genetic factors and environmental factors. It is necessary to carry out health education for the families of nasopharyngeal cancer, Avoid eating and curing foods, and actively improve production and living environment, so as to reduce the incidence rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Site-Specific Variation in Familial Cancer as Suggested by Family History, Multiple Primary Cancer, Age at Onset, and Sex Ratio Associated With Upper, Middle, and Lower Third Esophageal and Gastric Cardia Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In China, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) differ in terms of multiple primary cancer (MPC) and male-to-female sex ratio (MFSR). METHODS: We studied site-specific variation in familial cancer by comparing family history (FH), MPC, age at onset (AO), and MFSR among 8768 patients with ESCC/GCA. RESULTS: ESCC/GCA patients with a positive FH are associated with a significantly higher rate of MPC and a younger AO than those without (sex-specifically: MPC 1.6% vs. 0.7%, P<0.01 and 3.2% vs. 0.8%, P<0.01; AO 53.1 ± 8.1 vs. 54.5 ± 8.2, P=0.000 and 52.9 ± 7.4 vs. 54.0 ± 8.0, P=0.005). Among patients with a positive FH, MPC decreases significantly from upper-, middle-, and lower-third ESCC to GCA (sex-specifically: 53.6%, 1.8%, 1.6%, 0.8%, P=0.000; and 71.4%, 1.5%, 2.2%, 1.6%, P=0.000). From MPC, upper-, middle-, and lower-third ESCC to GCA, AO increased sex-specifically: 51.9 ± 7.2, 52.8 ± 7.9, 52.1 ± 8.3, 54.3 ± 8.4, 55.6 ± 7.6 (P=0.000) and 49.3 ± 6.5, 51.8 ± 9.8, 52.6 ± 7.8, 54.4 ± 8.0, 55.7 ± 7.2 (P=0.000), and FH decreased: 43.8%, 35.1%, 28.2%, 29.5%, 24.4% (P=0.000) and 55.2%, 26.7%, 25.0%, 24.3%, 22.3% (P=0.000). The preponderance of males, smoking, alcohol consumption, and patients ≥50 years old increased from 2.2:1, 1.7:1, 1.0:1, 2.0:1 in ESCC to 6.1:1, 2.8:1, 2.5:1, 4.0:1 in GCA, yet more MPCs were associated with non-preponderant than preponderant counterparts; particularly in GCA, the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The proportion of familial cancer may decrease from upper-, middle-, and lower-third ESCC to GCA. This entails molecular investigation, and appreciating this may help us devise a better screening strategy or individualize cancer treatment.

Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients with NOD2 mutation according to age.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to characterise patients with breast cancer (BC) and NOD2-mutation (age ≥ 50 years) according to their clinicopathological factors or family history. Patients aged ≥ 50 years were compared with the control group and with NOD2-mutation carriers aged < 50 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prognostic factors were analysed in patients with BC with confirmed NOD2 c.3016_3017insC (n = 150) mutations. The control group was selected from patients with BC without mutations (n = 376). RESULTS: There were significant differences between NOD2-mutation carriers and the control group aged ≥ 50 years, according to HER2 overexpression (p = 0.0001), ER (-) (p = 0.007), PR (-) (p = 0.003), T1-T2 (p = 0.011), and G3 (p = 0.036). Similarly, significant differences were observed between NOD2-mutation carriers and the control group aged < 50 years, according to HER2 overexpression (p = 0.0001), ER (-) (p = 0.049), and N (+) (p = 0.038). In patients aged ≥ 50 years, family history of cancer, including BC, was observed more often in NOD2-mutation carriers compared with the control group of patients (OR = 1.66; p = 0.072, for BC in family history: OR = 2.65; p = 0.002). NOD2-mutation carriers aged ≥ 50 years had significantly less frequent G3 (p = 0.004) and HER2 overexpression (p = 0.043) compared with patients with NOD2 mutation aged < 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the NOD2 mutation is not only characteristic of younger patients but also in patients > 50 years of age. In NOD2-mutation carriers aged ≥ 50 years, the presence of larger tumour size, G3, or HER2 overexpression were lower compared with younger patients with NOD2 mutation.

Gender differences in self-reported family history of cancer: A review and secondary data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of family history of cancer (FHC) mostly relies on self-report. Our goal was to find out whether there is a systematic gender difference in self-reported FHC. METHODS: We identified nine population-based studies which provided statistics of FHC in men and women (N1  = 404 541). Furthermore, we analyzed data (N2  = 167 154) from several iterations of the US-based Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We calculated the proportion of positive FHC, odds ratios (OR M/F), 95% confidence intervals, and aggregated statistics. We additionally analyzed in-depth questions about FHC from HINTS 5 Cycle 2. RESULTS: In the reviewed studies the odds of men reporting a FHC were lower compared with the odds of women with an average OR of 0.84 [0.71; 1.00] across all studies and an OR of 0.75 [0.70; 0.80] for the six studies from the US and Europe. The gender gap was replicated in our own analyses of HINTS and NHIS with an average OR of 0.75 [0.71; 0.79]. In HINTS 5 Cycle 2 men described themselves as less familiar with their FHC and less confident answering questions regarding FHC. They were also less likely to discuss FHC with family members. CONCLUSIONS: Men- at least in the US and Europe-were consistently less likely to report FHC compared with women. Future research should investigate how the assessment of FHC can be improved to reduce these differences. Health care professionals should also consider the potential for biased reporting by gender when assessing FHC.

Evaluating the role of FAMIly history of cancer and diagnosis of multiple neoplasms in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: the multicenter FAMI-L1 study.

Background: We investigate the role of family history of cancer (FHC) and diagnosis of metachronous and/or synchronous multiple neoplasms (MN), during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Design: This was a multicenter retrospective study of advanced cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. FHC was collected in lineal and collateral lines, and patients were categorized as follows: FHC-high (in case of cancer diagnoses in both the lineal and collateral family lines), FHC-low (in case of cancer diagnoses in only one family line), and FHC-negative. Patients were also categorized according to the diagnosis of MN as follows: MN-high (>2 malignancies), MN-low (two malignancies), and MN-negative. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade were evaluated. Results: 822 consecutive patients were evaluated. 458 patients (55.7%) were FHC-negative, 289 (35.2%) were FHC-low, and 75 (9.1%) FHC-high, respectively. 29 (3.5%) had a diagnosis of synchronous MN and 94 (11.4%) of metachronous MN. 108 (13.2%) and 15 (1.8%) patients were MN-low and MN-high, respectively. The median follow-up was 15.6 months. No significant differences were found regarding ORR among subgroups. FHC-high patients had a significantly longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.48-0.97], p = .0379) and OS (HR = 0.61 [95% CI: 0.39-0.93], p = .0210), when compared to FHC-negative patients. FHC-high was confirmed as an independent predictor for PFS and OS at multivariate analysis. No significant differences were found according to MN categories. FHC-high patients had a significantly higher incidence of irAEs of any grade, compared to FHC-negative patients (p = .0012). Conclusions: FHC-high patients seem to benefit more than FHC-negative patients from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.

Access to Personal Health Records and Screening for Breast and Cervical Cancer Among Women with a Family History of Cancer.

It is essential for at-risk women to be screened for breast and cervical cancer in a timely manner. Despite a growing interest in the role of health information technology including personal health records (PHRs) to improve quality and outcomes in health care, less is known about the effectiveness of PHRs to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among women with a family history of cancer (FHC). We examined the association between access to PHRs and the use of a recommended mammography and a Pap smear testing among women with a FHC using data from the 2015 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 4-cycle 4) and the 2016 Area Health Resource Files. The study sample was comprised of 1250 women aged 20-75 years with a FHC, a subsample of 3677 survey respondents. Of the 1250 women, 64.96% received a mammogram, and 75.44% underwent a Pap testing. Among women with a FHC, there was a significant and positive association between access to PHRs and the receipt of a mammogram (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.20; 95% CI, 2.23-7.94; p < .001) and a Pap testing (aOR 3.13; 95% CI, 1.56-6.28; p < .01). Our findings suggest that at-risk women can benefit from greater access to PHRs. Policymakers should consider incentivizing providers and healthcare organizations who provide access to PHRs to their patients as well as developing programs that can help improve access to PHRs among at-risk women.

Family history of cancer and subsequent risk of cancer: A large-scale population-based prospective study in Japan.

Family history (FH) of cancer is an important factor of increased risk of several cancers. Although the association between FH of cancer and concordant cancer risk has been reported in many previous epidemiological studies, no comprehensive prospective study with adjustment for lifestyle habits has evaluated the association of FH of cancer and concordant cancer risk. We investigated the association between FH of cancer and concordant cancer risk in a Japanese population-based prospective study, initiated in 1990 for cohort I and in 1993 for cohort II. We analyzed data on 103,707 eligible subjects without a history of cancer who responded to a self-administered questionnaire including FH of cancer at baseline. Study subjects were followed through 2012 and analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. During 1,802,581 person-years of follow-up, a total of 16,336 newly diagnosed cancers were identified. Any site (Hazard ratios = 1.11 (95% confidence interval = 1.07-1.15]), esophagus (2.11 [1.00-4.45]), stomach (1.36 [1.19-1.55]), liver (1.69 [1.10-2.61]), pancreas (2.63 [1.45-4.79]), lung (1.51 [1.14-2.00]), uterus (1.93 [1.06-3.51]) and bladder cancers (6.06 [2.49-14.74]) with FH of the concordant cancer were associated with an increased risk compared to those without FH. Our findings suggest that having FH of cancer is associated with an increased risk of several concordant cancer incidences in an Asian population. Enquiring about FH of several types of cancer may be important in identifying groups at high-risk of those cancers.

Use of antidepressants in women after prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy: A Danish national cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy and use of antidepressants in women with a family history of cancer. METHODS: Nationwide population-based cohort study using Danish National Registries including women oophorectomized due to a family history of cancer (n = 2,002) and an age matched reference group (n = 18,018). Analyses were stratified by age at time of bilateral oophorectomy and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). RESULTS: Women oophorectomized at age ≤ 45 years were more likely to use antidepressants from the first year after bilateral oophorectomy (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI: 1.08-1.65) compared to the reference group. Women oophorectomized at age 46-55 years and at age >55 years had no significantly increased use of antidepressants (OR = 0.90; 95 % CI: 0.68-1.18 and OR = 1.14; 95 % CI: 0.81-1.61). The increased use of antidepressants in women oophorectomized at age ≤ 45 years was limited to women treated with HRT (OR = 1.51; 95 % CI: 1.18-1.94) whereas women oophorectomized at age ≤ 45 years not treated with HRT had no increased use of antidepressants (OR = 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.70-1.51). CONCLUSIONS: Women oophorectomized due to a family history of cancer at age ≤ 45 years were more likely to use antidepressants after bilateral oophorectomy. The increased use of antidepressants was limited to women treated with HRT. The study calls for further large-scale studies to understand how bilateral oophorectomy and concomitant HRT affects risk of depression in women with a family history of cancer.

Potential genetic modifiers for somatic EGFR mutation in lung cancer: a meta-analysis and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates inherited risk in the aetiology of lung cancer, although smoking exposure is the major attributing factor. Family history is a simple substitute for inherited susceptibility. Previous studies have shown some possible yet conflicting links between family history of cancer and EGFR mutation in lung cancer. As EGFR-mutated lung cancer favours female, never-smoker, adenocarcinoma and Asians, it may be argued that there may be some underlying genetic modifiers responsible for the pathogenesis of EGFR mutation. METHODS: We searched four databases for all original articles on family history of malignancy and EGFR mutation status in lung cancer published up to July 2018. We performed a meta-analysis by using a random-effects model and odds ratio estimates. Heterogeneity and sensitivity were also investigated. Then we conducted a second literature research to curate case reports of familial lung cancers who studied both germline cancer predisposing genes and their somatic EGFR mutation status; and explored the possible links between cancer predisposing genes and EGFR mutation. RESULTS: Eleven studies have been included in the meta-analysis. There is a significantly higher likelihood of EGFR mutation in lung cancer patients with family history of cancer than their counterparts without family history, preferentially in Asians (OR = 1.35[1.06-1.71], P = 0.01), those diagnosed with adenocarcinomas ((OR = 1.47[1.14-1.89], P = 0.003) and those with lung cancer-affected relatives (first and second-degree: OR = 1.53[1.18-1.99], P = 0.001; first-degree: OR = 1.76[1.36-2.28, P < 0.0001]). Familial lung cancers more likely have concurrent EGFR mutations along with mutations in their germline cancer predisposition genes including EGFR T790 M, BRCA2 and TP53. Certain mechanisms may contribute to the combination preferences between inherited mutations and somatic ones. CONCLUSIONS: Potential genetic modifiers may contribute to somatic EGFR mutation in lung cancer, although current data is limited. Further studies on this topic are needed, which may help to unveil lung carcinogenesis pathways. However, caution is warranted in data interpretation due to limited cases available for the current study.

Family history of cancer and the risk of childhood brain tumors: a pooled analysis of the ESCALE and ESTELLE studies (SFCE).

PURPOSE: Although some specific genetic syndromes such as neurofibromatosis (NF) have been identified as risk factor of childhood brain tumors (CBT), the potential role of inherited susceptibility in CBT has yet to be elucidated. METHODS: To further investigate this, we conducted a pooled analysis of two nationwide case-control studies ESCALE and ESTELLE. The mothers of 509 CBT cases and 3,102 controls aged under 15 years who resided in France at diagnosis/interview, frequency-matched by age and gender, responded to a telephone interview conducted by trained interviewers. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: CBT was significantly associated with the family history of cancer in relatives (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5). The OR was slightly higher for maternal relatives than for paternal relatives, and when at least two relatives had a history of cancer. CBT was significantly associated with a family history of brain tumor (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.7). This association seemed stronger for first-degree relatives (mother, father, and siblings), for whom, by contrast, no association was seen for cancers other than CBT. No specificity by CBT subtypes or by age of the children were found for any of these findings. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis of a familial susceptibility of CBT, not due to being a known NF carrier.