Validation of the European Portuguese Version of the Yale Pharyngeal Severity Rating Scale.

This study aimed to validate the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale's European Portuguese version and investigate the impact of rater experience. The scale measures the severity of residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus. Ninety Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing images were selected after consensus and proposed to 13 raters who were asked to assess the severity of pharyngeal residue (PR) in each image in two moments with an interval of two weeks. The raters were divided by years of experience conducting the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing and in experience using severity scales for residues. Construct validity, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability were assessed by kappa statistics. The original English scale was translated into European Portuguese using a forward-backward method for validation. The scale reliability was strong, with an elevated intra-rater internal consistency for vallecula (Cronbach's alpha = 0.982) and pyriform sinus (Cronbach's alpha = 0.922). Inter-rater reliability for raters was equally significant and high for vallecula (0.613 for first assessment and 0.604 for second assessment) and pyriform sinus (0.558 for first assessment and 0.509 for second assessment) or for raters with experience using Yale Pharyngeal Severity Rating Scale (vallecula with 0.832 for first assessment and 0.717 for second assessment and pyriform sinus with 0.856 for first assessment and 0.714 for second assessment).The European Portuguese version of the Yale Pharyngeal Severity Rating Scale is a valid, reliable instrument for scoring the location and severity of pharyngeal residue in the context of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Association of dysphagia severity in multiple system atrophy with the specific binding ratio on dopamine transporter SPECT.

OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia in multiple system atrophy (MSA) is life-threatening and is caused by parkinsonism with cerebellar ataxia as a contributing factor. The present study investigated the relationship between dysphagia severity in MSA and the specific binding ratio (SBR) on dopamine transporter (DaT) SPECT using the Hyodo score, a qualitative scale for use with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). METHODS: Hyodo score's ability to predict aspiration during a FEES examination of 88 patients with MSA was first tested. Then the clinical characteristics, Hyodo score, and SBR of patients with either predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P; n = 11) or cerebellar ataxia (MSA-C; n = 25) who underwent FEES and DaT SPECT simultaneously were compared. RESULTS: Logistic regression demonstrated that the Hyodo score was a significant predictive factor of aspiration (p = 0.003). The MSA-P group had a significantly higher Hyodo score (p = 0.026) and lower SBR (p = 0.011) than the MSA-C group while neither group demonstrated any significant difference in disease duration at the FEES examination. Linear regression demonstrated a significant, inverse correlation between the Hyodo score and SBR in the MSA-P (p = 0.044; r = -0.616) and MSA-C (p = 0.044; r = -0.406) groups. When the effect of SBR was removed by analysis of covariance, no significant difference in the Hyodo score remained between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested an association between presynaptic changes in nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons and dysphagia severity in MSA which largely contributes to the difference in dysphagia severity between MSA-P and MSA-C.

Fiberoptic Endoscopy Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) Findings Associated with High Pneumonia Risk in a Cohort of Patients at Risk of Dysphagia.

Aspiration detected in the fiberoptic endoscopy evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has been inconsistently associated with pneumonia, with no evidence of the risk of pneumonia from other alterations in swallowing safety detected in FEES. We conducted a dynamic, ambidirectional cohort study involving 148 subjects at risk of dysphagia in a tertiary university hospital. Our aim was to determine the risk of pneumonia attributed to alterations in swallowing safety detected during FEES. We used multivariate negative binomial regression models to adjust for potential confounders. The incidence density rate (IR) of pneumonia in patients with tracheal aspiration of any consistency was 26.6/100 people-years (RR 7.25; 95% CI: 3.50-14.98; P < 0.001). The IR was 19.7/100 people-years (RR 7.85; 95% CI: 3.34-18.47; P < 0.001) in those with laryngeal penetration of any consistency and 18.1/100 people-years (RR 6.24; 95% CI: 2.58-15.09; P < 0.001) in those with pharyngeal residue of any consistency. When adjusted for aspiration, the association of residue and penetration with pneumonia disappeared, suggesting that their risk of pneumonia is dependent on the presence of aspiration and that only aspiration is independently associated with pneumonia. This increased risk of pneumonia was significant in uni- and multivariate negative binomial regression models. We found an independently increased risk of pneumonia among patients with dysphagia and aspiration detected during FEES. Alterations in the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing, without aspiration, did not increase the risk of pneumonia.

Impact of Modified Diet, Swallowing Exercises, and Electrostimulation on Quality of Life of Older Patients Suffering from Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Background and Objectives: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is defined as a swallowing disorder in which it becomes difficult to form a bolus and move food from the mouth to the proximal part of the esophagus. Several factors can cause this disorder in geriatric patients. With oropharyngeal dysphagia, the patient's social isolation and the risk of depression increase, while the quality of life deteriorates. Materials and Methods: In this study, oropharyngeal dysphagia was suspected based on the EAT-10 questionnaire and diagnosed with the water drink test and endoscopic swallowing evaluation, which assesses the aspiration risk by using an eight-point Penetration-Aspiration scale. Patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia received complex treatment: exercises to strengthen the swallowing muscles, electrostimulation of the swallowing muscles, and a modified diet. The quality of life of 64 patients was assessed by using the DHI, SWAL-QoL, and EAT-10 questionnaires before complex treatment and after treatment. The results show that the quality of life improved after the complex treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Results: The mean age of patients was 77.8 (9.1) years, and 56.3% of patients were women. At baseline, mild oropharyngeal dysphagia was found in 18.8% of patients; moderate-in 51.6%; and severe-in 29.7%. Aspiration risk was low in 28.1% of patients; medium-in 39.1%; and high-in 32.8%. The severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration risk significantly decreased after treatment (p = 0.002). The EAT-10 score mean was 15.23 (8.92) points before treatment and decreased to 11.50 (6.12) points after treatment (p < 0.001). Before treatment, the DHI physical score was 15.75 (6.813), the DHI functional score was 14.56 (8.659), and the DHI emotional score was 11.06 (7.848) (p < 0.001), and after complex treatment, the DHI physical score was 14.56 (8.659), the DHI functional score was 9.74 (7.165), and the DHI emotional score was 7.94 (6.588) (p < 0.001). The total SWAL-QoL score mean was 132.71 (34.392) points before treatment and increased to 152.42 (30.547) points after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Complex treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia plays an important role in improving the quality of life and reducing aspiration risk in older people affected by this condition.

Swallowing muscle mass contributes to post-stroke dysphagia in ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic dysphagia is a frequent complication of stroke and is associated with aspiration pneumonia and poor outcomes. Although ischaemic lesion location and size are major determinants of the presence and severity of post-stroke dysphagia, little is known about the contribution of other acute stroke-unrelated factors. We aimed to analyse the impact of swallowing and non-swallowing muscles measurements on swallowing function after large vessel occlusion stroke. METHODS: This retrospective study was based on a prospective registry of consecutive ischaemic stroke patients. Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy between July 2021 and June 2022 and received a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) within 5 days after admission were included. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and imaging data were collected from the registry. The cross-sectional areas (CSA) of selected swallowing muscles (as a surrogate marker for swallowing muscle mass) and of cervical non-swallowing muscles were measured in computed tomography. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated and used as a surrogate marker for whole body muscle mass. FEES parameters, namely, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS, as a surrogate marker for dysphagia presence and severity), penetration aspiration scale, and the presence of moderate-to-severe pharyngeal residues were collected from the clinical records. Univariate and multivariate ordinal and logistic regression analyses were performed to analyse if total CSA of swallowing muscles and SMI were associated with FEES parameters. RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 137 patients, 59 were female (43.1%), median age was 74 years (interquartile range 62-83), median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 12 (interquartile range 7-16), 16 patients had a vertebrobasilar occlusion (11.7%), and successful recanalization was achieved in 127 patients (92.7%). Both total CSA of swallowing muscles and SMI were significantly correlated with age (rho = -0.391, P < 0.001 and rho = -0.525, P < 0.001, respectively). Total CSA of the swallowing muscles was independently associated with FOIS (common adjusted odds ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.16, P = 0.029), and with the presence of moderate-to-severe pharyngeal residues for puree consistencies (adjusted odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval = 0.81-0.99, P = 0.036). We found no independent association of SMI with any of the FEES parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline swallowing muscle mass contributes to the pathophysiology of post-stroke dysphagia. Decreasing swallowing muscle mass is independently associated with increasing severity of early post-stroke dysphagia and with increased likelihood of moderate-to-severe pharyngeal residues.

Pharyngeal Residues Scoring through the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS): Efficacy of Training.

The assessment of pharyngeal residues during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is based on visual-perceptual scales that involve clinical subjectivity. Training might be helpful to increase agreement among clinicians. This paper aims to assess the efficacy of training for the assessment of pharyngeal residue in FEES frames and videos through the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Twenty-nine clinicians (Phoniatricians, Otorhinolaryngologists, Speech and Language Pathologists) and 47 students in Speech and Language Pathology participated in this study. Fourteen clinicians were randomly allocated to the training group, whilst the remaining 15 served as a control group; all the students participated in the training. Participants scored 30 pairs of videos and frames using the YPRSRS twice, before and after the training for the training groups and at least two weeks apart for the control group. Construct validity, defined as the agreement between each rater and the experts' scores, and inter-rater reliability were compared among the groups and between the first and the second assessments to verify the efficacy of the training. Construct validity significantly improved at the second assessment in the training group for the pyriform sinuses videos (baseline 0.71 ± 0.04, post-training 0.82 ± 0.05, p = .049) and in the students' group for the valleculae (baseline 0.64 ± 0.02, post-training 0.84 ± 0.02, p < .001) and pyriform sinuses videos (baseline 0.55 ± 0.03, post-training 0.77 ± 0.02, p < .05). No significant differences were found in the inter-rater reliability in any group. In conclusion, the training seems to improve participants' agreement with experts in scoring the YPRSRS in FEES videos.

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the state-of-art regarding the use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics, specifically investigating FEES feasibility, safety, diagnostic accuracy, and protocols. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched for original studies on the pediatric population that instrumentally assessed swallowing function using FEES. A hand-search of the references of included studies was performed. Data on the population, feasibility of endoscope insertion and bolus trials, adverse events, sensitivity and specificity, and FEES equipment and protocol were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the checklists of the Johanna Briggs Institute. Selection of the studies, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted by two independent researchers. RESULTS: Eighty-two reports from 81 studies were included. The mean overall quality of the studies was 80 % (17-100 %). The feasibility of endoscope insertion was high (89%-100 %), while the feasibility of bolus trials varied from 40 % to 100 %. Adverse events were excessive crying (8 studies), irritability or agitation (4 studies), transitory oxygen desaturations (3 studies, 1.2-6.7 % of the patients), epistaxis (3 studies, 0.8-3.3 % of the patients), increased heart rate (1 study, 1 patient), vomiting (1 study, 1 patient), hypertonia (1 study), and hypersalivation (1 study). No major complications were reported. Using VFSS as the reference standard, FEES was generally found to be less sensitive (25-94 %) but more specific (75-100 %) for aspiration, whereas the reverse was true for penetration (sensitivity 76-100 %, specificity 44-83 %). FEES protocols were highly heterogeneous with poor reporting. CONCLUSION: FEES is a safe, accurate, and generally feasible examination in the pediatric population with suspected dysphagia. However, a consensus on the best FEES protocol for clinical practice and research is currently lacking.

Asymptomatic Dysphagia and Aspiration in Patients with Idiopathic Bronchiectasis.

PURPOSE: Although considered contributors to idiopathic bronchiectasis (IB), neither dysphagia nor silent aspiration have been systematically evaluated in IB patients. We aimed to explore the prevalence of asymptomatic dysphagia and silent aspiration in IB patients and to identify parameters predictive of their presence. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included IB patients from our Pulmonary Institute without prior history of dysphagia and without prior dysphagia workup. Swallowing function was assessed by the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) questionnaire and by the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) test. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (31 females, mean age 67 ± 16 years) were recruited. An EAT-10 score ≥ 3 (risk for swallowing problems) was present in 21 patients (44.6%). Forty-two patients (89.3%) had at least one abnormal swallowing parameter in the FEES test. Six patients (12.7%) had a penetration aspiration score (PAS) in the FEES of at least 6, indicating aspiration. An EAT-10 score of 3 was found to be the ideal cutoff to predict aspiration in the FEES, with a good level of accuracy (area under the curve = 0.78, 95% CI 0.629-0.932, p = 0.03) and sensitivity of 83%. This cutoff also showed a trend towards a more severe disease using the FACED (forced expiratory volume, age, colonization with pseudomonas, extension of lung involvement, dyspnea) score (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dysphagia is prevalent in IB and may be undiagnosed if not specifically sought. We recommend screening all patients with IB for dysphagia by the EAT-10 questionnaire and referring all those with a score of ≥ 3 to formal swallowing assessment.

Fiberoptic endoscopic assessment of dysphagia in a patient with cutaneous and oropharyngeal blisters.

Dysphagia resulting from bulbous pemphigoid is a rare but significant manifestation. A 77-year-old with bullous pemphigoid with no neurological history presented with severe oropharyngeal dysphagia, attributable to underlying blistering and edema, as documented on a fiberoptic endoscopic swallow examination.

Assessment of Swallowing Function in Healthy Adults While Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula.

OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for respiratory support, the effect of HFNC on swallowing physiology is poorly understood. Flow rates that permit safe swallowing have not been established. We aim to assess if healthy individuals have diminished swallowing function and safety at high flow rates. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures with planned data collection. SETTING: Outpatient dysphagia clinic. METHODS: Swallowing function in a cohort of healthy individuals was assessed using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). Participants' safety of swallowing was assessed with different textures under randomized rates of HFNC (0, 30, 40, 50, and 60 LPM). Swallowing trials included quantities of thin liquids, mildly-thick liquids, and purees. Trials were scored using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Pearson chi-square tests were used to test for correlation between PAS result, flow rate, and consistency across each quantity of material. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled. Forty-one percent were male with mean age of 34 years (11 standard deviation). Ninety-nine percent (267/270), 97% (n = 263/270), and 99% (399/405) of 1 sip swallows, 3 sip swallows, and 5 mL swallows, respectively, were safe. There was no significant correlation between swallow safety and flow rate using Pearson Chi-Square test across all consistencies and across all quantities of materials (P > 0.05). Of note, out of all subtrials, the thin liquid, 3 sips trial at 60 LPM, had the largest percent of unsafe swallows (14%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest rate of aspiration is not significantly affected by high flow nasal cannula in healthy individuals.

Pharyngeal Residue Scoring in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: Reliability Comparison and Applicability Among Different Scales.

Several scales to assess pharyngeal residue in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are currently available. The study aimed to compare the reliability and the applicability in real clinical practice among four rating scales: the Pooling Score (P-SCORE), the Boston Residue and Clearance Scale (BRACS), the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), and the Residue Ordinal Rating Scale (RORS). Twenty-five FEES videos were evaluated four times, once for each scale, by four speech and language pathologists. To test intra-rater reliability, the same raters re-assessed the videos two weeks apart. To test the applicability, raters recorded the time required to complete each assessment and the perceived difficulty/ease on a visual-analog scale (VAS). The intra-rater and the inter-rater reliability were calculated with Cohen's weighted Kappa and the Fleiss weighted Kappa, respectively. Time and perceived difficulty/ease scores were compared. The intra-rater reliability analysis showed almost perfect agreement for YPRSRS (k = 0.91) and RORS (k = 0.83) and substantial agreement for P-SCORE (k = 0.76) and BRACS (k = 0.74). Pairwise comparison showed no significant differences among the scales. The inter-rater reliability for the YPRSRS (k = 0.78) was significantly higher than P-SCORE (k = 0.52, p < 0.001), BRACS (k = 0.56, p < 0.001), and RORS (k = 0.65, p = 0.005). The BRACS required the longest time (p < 0.001) and was perceived as the most difficult scale (p < 0.001). The RORS was perceived as the easiest scale (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the YPRSRS showed the highest reliability, while raters perceived the RORS as the easiest to score. These results will allow clinicians to consciously choose which scale to use in clinical practice.

Risk of Aspiration Increased by Post-swallow Residue in Infant Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of aspiration associated with post-swallow residue subsites in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in bottle-fed infants <1 year of age. METHODS: This is a retrospective matched-pairs cohort study at an academic tertiary children's hospital. FEES and Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) trials performed within the same infant <5 days apart were paired by matching bolus consistency and bottle flow rate. Positive aspiration was defined by the "or rule" in which aspiration is positive when either FEES or VFSS within a matched pair is positive. RESULTS: Eighty-seven FEES-VFSS matched pairs from 29 patients (16 males; mean [SD] age, 2.9 [2.8] months) were included. The rate of positive aspiration, as defined by the "or rule", was 59% (51/87). In FEES, post-swallow pyriform sinus residue was present in 16% (14/87) and anterior commissure residue 27% (31/87). Risk of positive aspiration was increased by pyriform sinus residue (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-19.3, p < 0.01) and anterior commissure residue in FEES (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-6.1, p = 0.03). In the neonate subgroup, <1 month of age, multivariate-adjusted analysis showed that anterior commissure residue had better diagnostic accuracy for aspiration than in older infants (overall 70% vs. 42%, p < 0.01; sensitivity 60% vs. 10%, p < 0.01), whereas pyriform sinus residue had worse accuracy (overall 41% vs. 70%, p = 0.02; sensitivity 13% vs. 43%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that pyriform sinus and anterior commissure residue during infant FEES were associated with fivefold and twofold increased risk of aspiration, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3: Using a retrospective matched-pairs cohort, this study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of post-swallow residue in FEES for predicting aspiration. Laryngoscope, 134:1431-1436, 2024.

Head and Neck Cancer: A Study on the Complex Relationship between QoL and Swallowing Function.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is linked to significant morbidity, adversely affecting survival and functional capacity. Post-treatment challenges such as pain, dysphonia, and dysphagia are common, prompting increased attention in survivorship research. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires, especially the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), are prevalent outcome measures in clinical studies but often lack parallel objective swallowing function evaluations, leading to potential outcome discrepancies. This study aimed to illuminate the relationship between subjective QoL (EQ-5D-5L and MDADI) measures and objective swallowing function (evaluated via Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, FEES) in patients with HNSCC. The analysis revealed a notable discordance between objective measures of swallowing function, such as the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and residue ratings in the vallecula or piriform sinus, and patients' subjective QoL assessments (p = 0.21). Despite the lack of correlation, swallowing-related QoL, as measured by the MDADI, was more indicative of disease severity than generic QoL assessments. Generic QoL scores did not demonstrate substantial variation between patients. In contrast, MDADI scores significantly declined with advancing tumor stage, multimodal therapy, and reliance on feeding tubes. However, the clinical significance of this finding was tempered by the less than 10-point difference in MDADI scores. The findings of this study underline the limitations of QoL measures as standalone assessments in patients with HNSCC, given their reliance on patient-perceived impairment. While subjective QoL is a crucial aspect of evaluating therapeutic success and patient-centric outcomes, it may fail to capture critical clinical details such as silent aspirations. Consequently, QoL assessments should be augmented by objective evaluations of swallowing function in clinical research and practice to ensure a holistic understanding of patient well-being and treatment impact.

[Introduction of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and increase of the range of indications in our department]. / Fiberoszkóppal végzett funkcionális nyelésvizsgálat bevezetése és indikációs körének kiterjesztése klinikánkon.

Dysphagia is a disease resulting from preparatory or transport disorder of the swallowing process and it is divided into oropharyngeal and esophageal phases according to the site of the lesion. The ear, nose and throat assessment focuses on the oropharyngeal phase, but differential diagnosis, investigation, and treatment of the cause of dysphagia is often a complex task requiring multidisciplinary approach and collaboration. The method of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has been introduced at the Department of Ear, Nose and Throat and Head-Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, enabling the examination of otorhinolaryngological and neurological disorders of swallowing as well as objective analysis of patients' swallowing quality. The fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing is a minimally invasive procedure that allows visualization of the oropharyngeal phase of swallowing. It can identify anatomical abnormalities or neurological disorders causing dysphagia, thus playing a significant role in later patient rehabilitation. We hereby present our experiences in examinations of patients who underwent partial laryngectomy and/or pharyngectomy due to head and neck tumors as well as of those who underwent airway surgery duo to upper airway stenosis. Thanks to our collaboration with the Neurology Department, we also share our experiences gained during the examinations of patients struggling with oropharyngeal swallowing problems of various neurological origins. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(46): 1817-1823.

Prevalence of Post-extubation Airway Penetration and Aspiration among Critically Ill Patients Assessed by an Eight-point Penetration-Aspiration Scale Using Flexible Endoscopy: A Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Prolonged endotracheal intubation was found to be a risk factor for pulmonary aspiration following the extubation. In this study, we have tried to analyze the prevalence of airway penetration and aspiration among mechanically ventilated patient who received mechanical ventilation for a period of 48 hours or more. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was done among non-neurologic critically ill patients who had an endotracheal tube for more than 48 hours and who got extubated subsequently. Such patients were taken for a fiberoptic endoscopic swallow study after the initial assessment by a speech pathologist. Airway penetration and aspiration was assessed by an eight-point penetration-aspiration scale after giving a test feed. Results: Data of 99 patients were analyzed. Mean duration of intubation was 5.9 days. 1% of the patients had aspiration and 20% of the patients had varying degrees of penetration. Duration of endotracheal intubation, age, sex, comorbidities, admission diagnosis, and size of the endotracheal tube were found to have no association with penetration and aspiration. Conclusion: Prevalence of post-extubation aspiration was low among non-neurologic critically ill patients on short-term ventilation. Duration of endotracheal intubation, age, sex, comorbidities, and endotracheal tube size were not found to be significantly associated with the development of airway penetration. Key message: Contrary to previous studies, this study has shown that among non-neurologic critically ill patients who had an endotracheal tube for a shorter period before extubation, the prevalence of airway penetration and aspiration was low when assessed by an eight-point penetration-aspiration scale using flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. Hence, in such a cohort of patients, a routine swallowing evaluation by flexible endoscopy is not recommended. How to cite this article: Vijayan D, Suresh Kumar VK, Harikrishnanan, Menon J, Ragitha, Jacob M, et al. Prevalence of Post-extubation Airway Penetration and Aspiration among Critically Ill Patients Assessed by an Eight-point Penetration-Aspiration Scale Using Flexible Endoscopy: A Cross-sectional Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(9):651-654.

Utility of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Objective Dysphagia following cardiac surgery is common and associated with adverse outcomes. Among patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), we evaluated the impact of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) on outcomes. Methods A single-center pilot study was conducted in adults (≥18 years of age) undergoing durable LVAD (February 2019 - January 2020). Six patients were prospectively enrolled, evaluated, and underwent FEES within 72 hours of extubation-they were compared to 12 control patients. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Unpaired two-sided t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were performed. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Intraoperative criteria including duration of transesophageal echo (314 ± 86 min) and surgery (301 ± 74 min) did not differ. The mean time of intubation was comparable (57.3 vs. 68.7 hours, p=0.77). In the entire cohort, 30-day, one-year, two-year, and three-year mortality were 0%, 5.6%, 5.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of the patients that underwent FEES had inefficient swallowing function. The FEES group trended to a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (29.1 vs. 46.6 days, p=0.098), post-implantation LOS (25.3 vs 30.7 days, p=0.46), and lower incidence of postoperative pneumonia (16.7% vs. 50%, p=0.32) and sepsis (0% vs. 33.3%, p=0.25). Conclusion FEES did not impact 30-day, one-year, two-year, or three-year mortality. Though not statistically significant, patients who underwent FEES trended toward shorter LOS and lower postoperative pneumonia and sepsis rates. Additionally, we report a higher incidence of dysphagia among patients undergoing FEES despite comparable baseline risk factors with controls.

Characteristics of post-stroke dysphagia: A retrospective study based on FEES.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the characteristics of dysphagia in stroke patients with different lesion sites and explore the factors that impact the duration of nasogastric tube after post-stroke dysphagia (PSD). METHODS: Patients with PSD were screened for analysis. Stroke types and lesion sites were confirmed using MRI or CT scans. Included patients were categorized into two groups: supratentorial stroke group (including lobar and deep intracerebral stroke subgroups) and infratentorial stroke group (including brainstem and cerebellar stroke subgroups). Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), Penetration-aspiration scale (PAS), Yale pharyngeal residue (PR) severity rating scale, Functional oral intake scale (FOIS), Murray secretion severity rating scale (MSS), laryngopharyngeal sensation, and vocal fold mobility were investigated to assess the swallowing function. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included in the final analysis. Significant differences were found in PR scores (p < .001), PAS scores (p < .05), MSS scores (p < .05), and vocal fold mobility (p < .001) between infratentorial and supratentorial stroke groups. Moreover, lobar stroke showed significantly higher PR scores compared to the deep intracerebral stroke group (p < .05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated significant differences in the duration of nasogastric tube placement among the following groups: infratentorial versus supratentorial stroke, PAS ≤ 5 versus PAS > 5, PR ≥ 3 versus PR < 3, and normal vocal fold mobility versus vocal fold motion impairment group (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The infratentorial stroke may lead to worse swallowing function as compared to a supratentorial stroke. Additionally, patients with infratentorial stroke, PAS > 5, PR ≥ 3, or vocal fold motion impairment may contribute to a longer duration of nasogastric tube placement.

Utilization of Instrumentation in Swallowing Assessment of Surgical Patients during COVID-19.

The aim of this study is to describe a measured return to instrumental dysphagia assessments for our vulnerable surgical patient population, such that best practice patterns could be resumed and our staff kept safe from transmission of COVID-19. A retrospective medical record review provided data on clinical practice patterns of swallowing assessment in an at-risk surgical patient population. Outcomes of this study support protocols that allow clinicians to safely resume the use of instrumental assessment and return to best practice in dysphagia assessment for our surgical patient population.

Midterm outcome after en bloc resection of C2 chordoma with transoral mandibular split and mesh cage reconstruction: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive tumors that often occur in the axial spine, especially in the sacrum. The treatment of chordomas located in the upper cervical spine is challenging. En bloc resection is the preferred surgical option for total tumor removal. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a C2 chordoma in a 47-year-old Thai woman. She was treated with a two-stage, anterior-posterior, C2 total spondylectomy with titanium mesh cage reconstruction and radiotherapy. The first stage involved posterior stabilization from the occiput to C5, a total laminectomy, and removal of the posterior rings of the bilateral foramen transversarium to preserve the bilateral vertebral arteries. The second stage comprised a transoral mandibular split with en bloc resection of C2, followed by titanium mesh cage reconstruction and kick-off anterior cervical plating. At the 5 year follow-up, no tumor recurrence was identified on magnetic resonance imaging. The patient had no neurological deficits but still had minor complications from the anterior transoral mandibular split. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent midterm results were obtained using a transoral mandibular split with reconstruction and posterior spinal fusion from the occiput to the lower cervical spine coupled with adjuvant radiotherapy. We recommend this approach as the treatment of choice for chordoma in the upper cervical spine.

Development of a Visuoperceptual Measure for Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (V-FEES) in Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: An International Delphi Study.

Visuoperceptual evaluation of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is a commonly used assessment in dysphagia or swallowing disorders. Currently, no international consensus exists regarding which visuoperceptual measures to use for the analysis of FEES recordings. Moreover, existing visuoperceptual FEES measures are limited by poor and incomplete psychometric data, identifying an urgent need for developing a visuoperceptual measure to interpret FEES recordings. Following the COSMIN group's (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) psychometric taxonomy and guidelines, this study aimed to establish the content validity of a new visuoperceptual FEES (V-FEES) measure in adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Using the Delphi technique, international consensus was achieved among dysphagia experts across 21 countries, resulting in a new prototype measure for V-FEES, comprising 30 items, 8 function testing items (i.e., specific tasks performed by patients while observing and rating items), and 36 unique operationalisations (i.e., defining items into measurable factors that could be measured empirically using visuoperceptual observation). This study supports good content validity for V-FEES, including participants' feedback on the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the included items. Future studies will continue the instrument development process and determine the remaining psychometric properties using both the classic test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) models.