A novel variation in DEPDC5 causing familial focal epilepsy with variable foci.

Background: Disheveled, EGL-10, and pleckstrin (DEP) domain-containing protein 5 (DEPDC5) is a component of GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity toward the RAG complex 1 (GATOR1) protein, which is an inhibitor of the amino acid-sensing branch of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway. GATOR1 complex variations were reported to correlate with familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (FFEVF). With the wide application of whole exome sequencing (WES), more and more variations in DEPDC5 were uncovered in FFEVF families. Methods: A family with a proband diagnosed with familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (FFEVF) was involved in this study. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed in the proband, and Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the variation carrying status of the family members. Mini-gene splicing assay was performed to validate the effect on the alternative splicing of the variation. Results: A novel variant, c.1217 + 2T>A, in DEPDC5 was identified by WES in the proband. This splicing variant that occurred at the 5' end of intron 17 was confirmed by mini-gene splicing assays, which impacted alternative splicing and led to the inclusion of an intron fragment. The analysis of the transcribed mRNA sequence indicates that the translation of the protein is terminated prematurely, which is very likely to result in the loss of function of the protein and lead to the occurrence of FFEVF. Conclusion: The results suggest that c.1217 + 2T>A variations in DEPDC5 might be the genetic etiology for FFEVF in this pedigree. This finding expands the genotype spectrum of FFEVF and provides new etiological information for FFEVF.

Causal relations between ischemic stroke and epilepsy: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Although previous studies have reported a bidirectional relationship between ischemic stroke (IS) and epilepsy, the existence of a causal nexus and its directionality remains a topic of controversy. Methods: The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with IS were extracted from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) database. Pooled genetic data encompassing all epilepsy cases, as well as generalized and focal epilepsy subtypes, were acquired from the International League Against Epilepsy's GWAS study. In this study, the primary analysis approach utilized the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method as the main analytical technique. To enhance the robustness of the findings against potential pleiotropy, additional sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: In the forward analysis, the IVW method demonstrated that IS was associated with an increased risk of all epilepsy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.127, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.038-1.224, P = 0.004) and generalized epilepsy (IVW: OR = 1.340, 95 % CI = 1.162-1.546, P = 5.70 × 10-5). There was no substantial causal relationship observed between IS and focal epilepsy (P > 0.05). Furthermore, generalized epilepsy, focal epilepsy, and all epilepsy did not show a causal relationship with IS. Conclusion: This Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis demonstrates that IS increases the risk of developing epilepsy, especially generalized epilepsy. Conversely, no clear causal association was found between epilepsy and the onset of stroke. Therefore, the possible mechanisms of the effect of epilepsy on the pathogenesis of IS still need to be further investigated.

Efficacy of oral sodium chloride in reducing the incidence of hyponatremia in children with epilepsy receiving oxcarbazepine monotherapy: A randomized controlled trial (SCHO Trial).

INTRODUCTION: Hyponatremia is a well-documented adverse effect of oxcarbazepine treatment, but no clinical trial has yet been conducted to explore any intervention for reducing the incidence of hyponatremia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label trial evaluated the efficacy of add-on daily oral sodium chloride supplementation of 1-2 g/day for 12 weeks in reducing the incidence of hyponatremia in children receiving oxcarbazepine monotherapy aged 1-18 years. Apart from comparing the incidence of symptomatic and severe hyponatremia, serum and urine sodium levels, serum and urine osmolality, changes in behavior and cognition, and the number of participants with recurrence of seizures and requiring additional antiseizure medication (ASM) were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 120 children (60 in each group) were enrolled. The serum sodium level at 12 weeks in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (136.5 ± 2.6 vs 135.4 ± 2.5 mEq/L, p = 0.01). The number of patients with hyponatremia was significantly lower in the intervention group (4/60vs14/60, p = 0.01). However, the incidence of symptomatic and severe hyponatremia (0/60vs1/60, p = 0.67 for both), changes in social quotient and child behavior checklist total score (0.6 ± 0.8 vs 0.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.41 and 0.9 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.9, p = 0.30 respectively), the number of patients with breakthrough seizures (9/60vs10/60, p = 0.89), and the number of patients requiring additional ASMs (8/60vs10/60, p = 0.79) were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Daily oral sodium chloride supplementation is safe and efficacious in reducing the incidence of hyponatremia in children with epilepsy receiving oxcarbazepine monotherapy. However, sodium chloride supplementation does not significantly reduce more clinically meaningful outcome measures like symptomatic and severe hyponatremia. Trial registry No. CTRI/2021/12/038388.

Association of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 levels in lateralized temporal epilepsy patients.

Objectives: To explore the clinical significance of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in the development of lateralized temporal epilepsy. METHODS: The prospective study was conducted from January to April of 2022 at the Neurology Department of Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Turkey, and comprised patients with lateralized temporal epilepsy aged 18-86 years who were in the interictal period in group A and healthy controls in group B. The levels of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 of patients in both groups were compared. Data was analysed using SPSS 25. RESULTS: Of the 92 subjects, 60(65.2%) were in group A; 35(58.3%) were males and 25(41.7%) were females with a median age of 37.5 years (interquartile range: 2.2-42.7 years). There were 32(34.8%) subjects in group B; 19(40.6%) females and 13(40.6%) males with a median age of 40.5 years (interquartile range: 25-50 years) (p>0.05). Within group A, 41(68.3%) patients had left-sided epilepsy and 19(31.7%) had right-sided epilepsy (p<0.001). Both interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 levels were lower in group A than in group B (p<0.001). Both interleukin levels did not significantly differ between right and leftlateralised temporal seizures (p=0.44). In the left-lateralized temporal seizures, interleukin-1 levels correlated with epilepsy duration (p<0.006), lower onset age (p<0.050), and presence of prenatal risk (p<0.028). Interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 levels were positively correlated with each other for lateralized temporal epileptic hemispheres (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Interleukin-1 level was correlated with epilepsy duration, lower onset age, and presence of prenatal risk in the left-lateralized temporal epilepsy.

Efficacy and safety of add-on antiseizure medications for focal epilepsy: A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Several antiseizure medications (ASMs) have been approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy. However, there is a paucity of evidence on direct comparison of ASMs. We evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of all approved add-on ASMs for the treatment of focal epilepsy using network meta-analysis. METHODS: Data through extensive literature search was retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases using predefined search terms from inception through March 2023. PRISMA reporting guidelines (CRD42023403450) were followed in this study. Efficacy outcomes assessed were ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates. Patient retention rate and safety outcomes such as overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and individual TEAEs were assessed. "Gemtc" 4.0.4 package was used to perform Bayesian analysis. Outcomes are reported as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Literature search retrieved 5807 studies of which, 75 studies were included in the analysis. All ASMs showed significantly higher ≥50% responder rate compared with placebo. Except the ≥75% seizure frequency reduction for zonisamide (2.23; 95% CI: 1.00-5.70) and 100% for rufinamide (2.03; 95% CI: 0.54-11.00), all other interventions showed significantly higher ≥75% and 100% responder rates compared with placebo. Among treatments, significantly higher 100% responder rate was observed with cenobamate compared to eslicarbazepine (10.71; 95% CI: 1.56-323.9) and zonisamide (10.63; 95% CI: 1.37-261.2). All ASMs showed a lower patient retention rate compared to placebo, with the least significant value observed for oxcarbazepine (0.77; 95% CI: 0.7-0.84). Levetiracetam showed a lower risk of incidence (1.0; 95%CI: 0.94-1.1; SUCRA: 0.885067) for overall TEAE compared with other medications. SIGNIFICANCE: All approved ASMs were effective as add-on treatment for focal epilepsy. Of the ASMs included, cenobamate had the greatest likelihood of allowing patients to attain seizure freedom. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This article compares the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medications (ASMs) currently available to neurologists in the treatment of epileptic patients. Several newer generation ASMs that have been developed may be as effective or better than the older medications. We included 75 studies in the analysis. In comparison, all drugs improved ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% responder rates compared to control, except for Zonisamide and Rufinamide in the ≥75% and 100% responder rate categories. Retention of patients undergoing treatment was lower in drugs than placebo. All drugs were tolerated, the levetiracetam showed the best tolerability. Cenobamate more likely help completely to reduce seizures.

The interictal suppression hypothesis is the dominant differentiator of seizure onset zones in focal epilepsy.

Successful surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy traditionally relies on the identification of seizure onset zones (SOZs). Connectome-based analyses of electrographic data from stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) may empower improved detection of SOZs. Specifically, connectome-based analyses based on the Interictal Suppression Hypothesis (ISH) posit that when the patient is not having a seizure, SOZs are inhibited by non-SOZs through high inward connectivity and low outward connectivity. However, it is not clear whether there are other motifs that can better identify potential SOZs. Thus, we sought to use unsupervised machine learning to identify network motifs that elucidate SOZs and investigate if there is another motif that outperforms the ISH. Resting-state SEEG data from 81 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing a pre-surgical evaluation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were collected. Directed connectivity matrices were computed using the alpha band (8-12Hz). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on each patient's connectivity matrix. Each patient's components were analyzed qualitatively to identify common patterns across patients. A quantitative definition was then used to identify the component that most closely matched the observed pattern in each patient. A motif characteristic of the Interictal Suppression Hypothesis (high-inward and low-outward connectivity) was present in all individuals and found to be the most robust motif for identification of SOZs in 64/81 (79%) patients. This principal component demonstrated significant differences in SOZs compared to non-SOZs. While other motifs for identifying SOZs were present in other patients, they differed for each patient, suggesting that seizure networks are patient specific, but the ISH is present in nearly all networks. We discovered that a potentially suppressive motif based on the Interictal Suppression Hypothesis was present in all patients, and it was the most robust motif for SOZs in 79% of patients. Each patient had additional motifs that further characterized SOZs, but these motifs were not common across all patients. This work has the potential to augment clinical identification of SOZs to improve epilepsy treatment.

Therapeutic strategies during cenobamate treatment initiation: Delphi panel recommendations.

The goal of epilepsy treatment is seizure freedom, typically with antiseizure medication (ASM). If patients fail to attain seizure control despite two trials of appropriately chosen ASMs at adequate doses, they are classified as having drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Adverse events (AEs) commonly occur in people with DRE because they are typically on ⩾2 ASMs, increasing the potential for drug-drug interactions. Early emerging AEs may impact adherence, decrease quality of life, and delay achieving optimal treatment dosages. Cenobamate is an oral ASM with a long half-life which has proven to be highly effective in clinical trials. An international Delphi panel of expert epileptologists experienced in the clinical use of cenobamate and other ASMs was convened to develop consensus best practices for managing patients during and after cenobamate titration, with consideration for its known pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, to allow patients to reach the most appropriate cenobamate dose while limiting tolerability issues. The modified Delphi process included one open-ended questionnaire and one virtual face-to-face meeting. Participants agreed that cenobamate can be prescribed for most patients experiencing focal-onset seizures. Patients initiating cenobamate therapy should have access to healthcare professionals as needed and their treatment response should be evaluated at the 100-mg dose. Patients with intellectual disabilities may need additional support to navigate the titration period. Proactive down-titration or withdrawal of sodium channel blockers (SCBs) is recommended when concomitant ASM regimens include ⩾2 SCBs. When applicable, maintaining a concomitant clobazam dose at ~5-10 mg may be beneficial. Patients taking oral contraceptives, newer oral anticoagulants, or HIV antiretroviral medications should be monitored for potential interactions. Because clinical evidence informing treatment decisions is limited, guidance regarding dose adjustments of non-ASM drugs was not developed beyond specific recommendations presented in the Summary of Product Characteristics.

SCN8A self-limited infantile epilepsy: Does epilepsy resolve?

SCN8A variants cause a spectrum of epilepsy phenotypes ranging from self-limited infantile epilepsy (SeLIE) to developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. SeLIE is an infantile onset focal epilepsy, occurring in developmentally normal infants, which often resolves by 3 years. Our aim was to ascertain when epilepsy resolves in SCN8A-SeLIE. We identified unpublished individuals with SCN8A-SeLIE and performed detailed phenotyping. Literature was searched for published SCN8A-SeLIE cases. Nine unpublished individuals from four families were identified (age at study = 3.5-66 years). Six had their last seizure after 3 years (range = 4-21 years); although drug-responsive and despite multiple weaning attempts (1-5), five of six remain on antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, n = 3; lamotrigine, n = 2). We identified 29 published individuals with SCN8A-SeLIE who had data on seizure progression. Of the 22 individuals aged at least 10 years, reported here or in the literature, nine of 22 (41%) had seizure offset prior to 3 years, five of 22 (23%) had seizure offset between 3 and 10 years, and eight of 22 (36%) had seizures after 10 years. Our data highlight that more than half of individuals with SCN8A-SeLIE continue to have seizures into late childhood. In contrast to SeLIE due to other etiologies, many individuals have a more persistent, albeit drug-responsive, form of epilepsy.

Characterization of antiseizure medications effects on the EEG neurodynamic by fractal dimension.

Objectives: An important challenge in epilepsy is to define biomarkers of response to treatment. Many electroencephalography (EEG) methods and indices have been developed mainly using linear methods, e.g., spectral power and individual alpha frequency peak (IAF). However, brain activity is complex and non-linear, hence there is a need to explore EEG neurodynamics using nonlinear approaches. Here, we use the Fractal Dimension (FD), a measure of whole brain signal complexity, to measure the response to anti-seizure therapy in patients with Focal Epilepsy (FE) and compare it with linear methods. Materials: Twenty-five drug-responder (DR) patients with focal epilepsy were studied before (t1, named DR-t1) and after (t2, named DR-t2) the introduction of the anti-seizure medications (ASMs). DR-t1 and DR-t2 EEG results were compared against 40 age-matched healthy controls (HC). Methods: EEG data were investigated from two different angles: frequency domain-spectral properties in δ, θ, α, ß, and γ bands and the IAF peak, and time-domain-FD as a signature of the nonlinear complexity of the EEG signals. Those features were compared among the three groups. Results: The δ power differed between DR patients pre and post-ASM and HC (DR-t1 vs. HC, p < 0.01 and DR-t2 vs. HC, p < 0.01). The θ power differed between DR-t1 and DR-t2 (p = 0.015) and between DR-t1 and HC (p = 0.01). The α power, similar to the δ, differed between DR patients pre and post-ASM and HC (DR-t1 vs. HC, p < 0.01 and DR-t2 vs. HC, p < 0.01). The IAF value was lower for DR-t1 than DR-t2 (p = 0.048) and HC (p = 0.042). The FD value was lower in DR-t1 than in DR-t2 (p = 0.015) and HC (p = 0.011). Finally, Bayes Factor analysis showed that FD was 195 times more likely to separate DR-t1 from DR-t2 than IAF and 231 times than θ. Discussion: FD measured in baseline EEG signals is a non-linear brain measure of complexity more sensitive than EEG power or IAF in detecting a response to ASMs. This likely reflects the non-oscillatory nature of neural activity, which FD better describes. Conclusion: Our work suggests that FD is a promising measure to monitor the response to ASMs in FE.

EEG in focal and generalized epilepsies: Pearls and perils.

Correctly diagnosing and classifying seizures and epilepsies is vital to ensure a tailored approach to patients with epilepsy. The ILAE seizure classification consists of two main groups: focal and generalized. Establishing if a seizure is focal or generalized is essential to classify the epilepsy type and the epilepsy syndrome, providing more personalized treatment and counseling about prognosis. EEG is one of the most essential tools for this classification process and further localization of the epileptogenic focus. However, some EEG findings are misleading and may postpone the correct diagnosis and proper treatment. Knowing the most common EEG pitfalls in focal and generalized epilepsies is valuable for clinical practice, avoiding misinterpretations. Some atypical features can be challenging in focal epilepsies, such as secondary bilateral synchrony, focal epileptiform activity induced by hyperventilation and photic stimulation, and non-focal slowing. On the other hand, more than 60 % of persons with idiopathic generalized epilepsies have at least one type of atypical abnormality. In this manuscript, we describe and illustrate some of the most common EEG findings that can make even experienced epileptologists question not only where the epileptogenic focus is but also if the patient has focal or generalized epilepsy. This review summarizes the perils and provide some pearls to assist EEG readers.

Unexpected Seizure Activity in the Setting of Lamotrigine Toxicity.

Lamotrigine, a widely utilized broad-spectrum anticonvulsant, is commonly prescribed for epilepsy management and bipolar mood disorders. Despite its extensive clinical usage, instances of lamotrigine overdose are underreported. Here, we present a case involving acute encephalopathy and seizure onset following an intentional lamotrigine overdose. This case underscores the importance of recognizing the potential clinical manifestations of lamotrigine toxicity, such as encephalopathy and seizures, emphasizing the necessity for vigilant management of patients receiving this medication.

WONOEP 2022: Neurotechnology for the diagnosis of epilepsy.

Epilepsy's myriad causes and clinical presentations ensure that accurate diagnoses and targeted treatments remain a challenge. Advanced neurotechnologies are needed to better characterize individual patients across multiple modalities and analytical techniques. At the XVIth Workshop on Neurobiology of Epilepsy: Early Onset Epilepsies: Neurobiology and Novel Therapeutic Strategies (WONOEP 2022), the session on "advanced tools" highlighted a range of approaches, from molecular phenotyping of genetic epilepsy models and resected tissue samples to imaging-guided localization of epileptogenic tissue for surgical resection of focal malformations. These tools integrate cutting edge research, clinical data acquisition, and advanced computational methods to leverage the rich information contained within increasingly large datasets. A number of common challenges and opportunities emerged, including the need for multidisciplinary collaboration, multimodal integration, potential ethical challenges, and the multistage path to clinical translation. Despite these challenges, advanced epilepsy neurotechnologies offer the potential to improve our understanding of the underlying causes of epilepsy and our capacity to provide patient-specific treatment.

Genetic testing, another important tool in presurgical evaluation of focal epilepsies in childhood.

Epilepsy surgery may be a curative therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsies when focal lesions or foci are identified. Genetic testing is not yet routinely included in many presurgical evaluation programs although recent evidence support that finding a germline genetic mutation could help to better delineate the patient candidacy to surgery and provide valuable information on the expected surgery outcome. In this study, we report nine patients presenting drug-resistant focal epilepsy enrolled in presurgical evaluation. We show how the identification of genetic pathogenic variant in epilepsy known genes led to the interruption of the presurgical work-up and ruled out surgery in 7 of them. We observed that the co-existence of some recurrent clinical characteristics as early seizures' onset, frequent precipitating factors including fever, and developmental delay or intellectual disability may be useful markers for germline genetic pathogenic variants. In this group, genetic assessment should be mandatory during presurgical work up, mainly in patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or doubtful structural lesions. The integration of next generation targeted sequencing into the presurgical evaluation can improve the selection of candidates for resective surgery and fosters a personalized medicine approach with a better outcome. PLAINE LANGUAGE ABSTRACT: Genetic testing is not yet systematically included in the pre-surgical assessment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsies. In this study, through the description of nine patients, we underline how the integration of genomics into the presurgical work up can help in evaluating the patient candidacy to surgery and provide valuable information on expected surgery outcome.

Molecular Genetics of Acquired Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

An epilepsy diagnosis reduces a patient's quality of life tremendously, and it is a fate shared by over 50 million people worldwide. Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is largely considered a nongenetic or acquired form of epilepsy that develops in consequence of neuronal trauma by injury, malformations, inflammation, or a prolonged (febrile) seizure. Although extensive research has been conducted to understand the process of epileptogenesis, a therapeutic approach to stop its manifestation or to reliably cure the disease has yet to be developed. In this review, we briefly summarize the current literature predominately based on data from excitotoxic rodent models on the cellular events proposed to drive epileptogenesis and thoroughly discuss the major molecular pathways involved, with a focus on neurogenesis-related processes and transcription factors. Furthermore, recent investigations emphasized the role of the genetic background for the acquisition of epilepsy, including variants of neurodevelopmental genes. Mutations in associated transcription factors may have the potential to innately increase the vulnerability of the hippocampus to develop epilepsy following an injury-an emerging perspective on the epileptogenic process in acquired forms of epilepsy.

DEPDC5 plays a vital role in epilepsy: Genotypic and phenotypic features in cohort and literature.

OBJECTIVE: DEPDC5 emerges to play a vital role in focal epilepsy. However, genotype-phenotype correlation in DEPDC5-related focal epilepsies is challenging and controversial. In this study, we aim to investigate the genotypic and phenotypic features in DEPDC5-affected patients. METHODS: Genetic testing combined with criteria published by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP), was used to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5 among the cohort of 479 patients with focal epilepsy. Besides, the literature review was performed to explore the genotype-phenotype correlation and the penetrance in DEPDC5-related focal epilepsies. RESULTS: Eight unrelated probands were revealed to carry different pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5 and the total prevalence of DEPDC5-related focal epilepsy was 1.67% in the cohort. Sixty-five variants from 28 studies were included in our review. Combined with the cases reported, null variants accounted for a larger proportion than missense variants and were related to unfavorable prognosis (drug resistance or even sudden unexpected death in epilepsy; χ2 = 5.429, p = .020). And, the prognosis of probands with developmental delay/intellectual disability or focal cortical dysplasia was worse than that of probands with simple epilepsy (χ2 = -, p = .006). Besides, the overall penetrance of variants in DEPDC5 was 68.96% (231/335). SIGNIFICANCE: The study expands the variant spectrum of DEPDC5 and proves that the DEPDC5 variant plays a significant role in focal epilepsy. Due to the characteristics of phenotypic heterogeneity and incomplete penetrance, genetic testing is necessary despite no specific family history. And we propose to adopt the ACMG/AMP criteria refined by ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group, for consistency in usage and transparency in classification rationale. Moreover, we reveal an important message to clinicians that the prognosis of DEPDC5-affected patients is related to the variant type and complications.

Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the epileptogenic zone: a potential treatment and prognostic indicator for subsequent excision surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) for drug-resistant focal epilepsy and investigate the relationship between post-RFTC remission duration and delayed excision surgery effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent RFTC via SEEG electrodes. After excluding three, the remaining 40 were classified into subgroups based on procedures and outcomes. Twenty-four patients (60%) underwent a secondary excision surgery. We determined the predictive value of RFTC outcome upon subsequent surgical outcome by categorizing the delayed secondary surgery outcome as success (Engel I/II) versus failure (Engel III/IV). Demographic information, epilepsy characteristics, and the duration of seizure freedom after RFTC were assessed. RESULTS: Among 40 patients, 20% achieved Engel class I with RFTC alone, while 24 underwent delayed secondary excision surgery. Overall, 41.7% attained Engel class I, with a 66.7% success rate combining RFTC with delayed surgery. Seizure freedom duration was significantly longer in the success group (mean 4.9 months, SD = 2.7) versus the failure group (mean 1.9 months, SD = 1.1; P = 0.007). A higher proportion of RFTC-only and delayed surgical success group patients had preoperative lesional findings (p = 0.01), correlating with a longer time to seizure recurrence (p < 0.05). Transient postoperative complications occurred in 10%, resolving within a year. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SEEG-guided RFTC is a safe and potential treatment option for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. A prolonged duration of seizure freedom following RFTC may serve as a predictive marker for the success of subsequent excision surgery.

Treatment simplification to optimize cenobamate effectiveness and tolerability: A real-world retrospective study in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the impact of co-antiseizure medication (co-ASM) optimization on the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate (CNB) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a real-world setting. METHODS: This unicentric, retrospective, observational study included adults with focal-onset seizures who had received ≥2 previous ASMs. The main effectiveness endpoints included responder rates and seizure frequency reduction at 3, 6, and 12-month visits. The number of co-ASMs and defined daily dose (DDD) were analyzed at every visit. Safety endpoints included adverse drug reactions (ADRs). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with a median epilepsy duration of 22 years and a median of 15.5 seizures/month were analyzed. The median number of prior ASMs was 12, and the mean number of co-ASMs was 2.9 (SD 1). There was a reduction in seizure frequency/month from baseline to the last visit (p < 0.0001). Between baseline and the end of the study, the mean number of co-ASMs in the per-protocol (PP) population was reduced from 2.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), and DDD was reduced from 3.6 to 1.4 (p < 0.0001). Sodium channel blockers (carbamazepine and lacosamide) and GABAergic drugs (clobazam) were the agents with the most significant reductions in DDD after 12 months. The percentage of patients in the PP population with ≥3 co-ASMs was reduced from 61.8% at baseline to 14.3% at 12 months; 1 patient was receiving CNB as monotherapy at the last visit. At the last visit, 85.7% of the PP population were ≥50% responders, and 33.3% were seizure-free. The percentage of patients with ADRs in the PP population was 71.9% at 3 months and 52.3% at 12 months. SIGNIFICANCE: Following rational polytherapy, optimization of co-ASM management during CNB treatment allowed high seizure freedom rates despite meaningful reductions in co-medication, while also achieving both good tolerability and patient satisfaction scores in a highly drug-resistant population. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Many patients with epilepsy still have seizures, even after being treated with several different epilepsy drugs. In this study of 34 patients from a Spanish clinic, we show that the epilepsy drug cenobamate can reduce the number of seizures in these patients, even after many other epilepsy drugs have failed. We also show that patients treated with cenobamate can reduce the dose or even stop taking certain other epilepsy drugs. This allows them to simplify their treatment and reduce adverse effects while still keeping control of their epilepsy.

Real-world anti-seizure treatment and adverse events among individuals living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand how people living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) navigate through lines of antiseizure medications (ASM) and experience adverse events (AEs) in the real-world setting in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with medical chart data from clinical practices in the United States. Eligible adults had a confirmed diagnosis of DRE and initiated a third-line ASM therapy between January 2013 and January 2020 (i.e., the index date). Subjects must have medical history data available for ≥1 year prior to (the baseline) and ≥2 years after the index date (the follow-up). Treatment patterns were captured from first to fourth lines. After the emergence of drug resistance, time to ASM discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, AE experience and AE management were reported separately during third and fourth lines of treatment and beyond. RESULTS: The study included a total of 345 individuals, with an average (standard deviation) age of 23.9 (11.9) years at first diagnosis. All individuals had at least three lines of ASMs with first and second lines during baseline, and third line during follow-up. The first line for most individuals was monotherapy. As individuals progressed through additional lines of ASM therapy, they were more likely to receive polytherapy. The regimens were more individualized after meeting drug resistance criteria. The top reasons for discontinuing were uncontrolled seizure and/or intolerance/AEs for both third and subsequent lines. More than a third of individuals experienced at least one AE. Among those with at least one AE, many individuals had to manage these AEs with dose adjustment (39.4%), discontinuation of offending ASM (37.9%), de novo pharmacotherapy (25.8%), emergency room visit (13.6%), and hospitalization (12.1%). SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that individuals living with DRE experience significant AEs, and many of these AEs lead to treatment disruption and significant healthcare resource utilization. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study examined how individuals with focal epilepsy are treated across various clinics in United States and reported the adverse events these individuals experienced during treatment, along with the consequence associated with these adverse events. We found that as individuals progressed through additional treatments, they were more and more likely to receive more than one antiseizure medication, and a significant portion of individuals experienced at least one adverse event, often manifested as headache, somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive cenobamate based on patient etiology: Post-hoc analysis of YKP3089C017 randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Adjunctive cenobamate was effective and safe for the treatment of uncontrolled focal onset seizures in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (YKP3089C017; NCT01866111). This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate in the treatment of patients with different epileptic etiologies during the study. METHODS: Adult patients with uncontrolled focal seizures who previously received 1 to 3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or cenobamate 100, 200 or 400 mg/day. Patients were further stratified based on their etiologic causes as genetic/presumed genetic, unknown cause, structural cause, and not reported (NR) groups. The frequency per 28 days for an 18-week double-blind treatment period, responder rates (≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 %) during the maintenance phase (12 weeks), and safety were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 394 patients were categorized into the genetic/presumed genetic (n = 9; 2.28 %), unknown cause (n = 199; 50.51 %), structural cause (n = 177; 44.92 %), and NR (n = 13; 3.30 %) groups, with 4 patients were classified into either of the two etiological causes each. The baseline characteristics were comparable. The percentage of reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days was significantly higher in the cenobamate-treated structural (p = 0.01) and unknown cause (p = 0.0003) groups compared with the placebo group. Responder rates of ≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 % were also higher with cenobamate therapy. Notably, no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in the genetic/presumed genetic group treated with cenobamate. The most common TEAEs (≥10 %) occurring in patients treated with cenobamate were nervous system disorders by system organ class, and somnolence was the most commonly reported TEAE. CONCLUSION: Cenobamate reduces seizures in adult patients previously treated with ASMs, with high responder rates and acceptable safety, regardless of underlying causes.

Psychiatric complications following SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulations in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC) in the epileptogenic regions is a therapeutic option for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who may have or not indication for epilepsy surgery. The most common adverse events of RF-TC are seizures, headaches, somatic pain, and sensory-motor deficits. If RF-TC could lead to psychiatric complications is unknown. In the present study, seven out of 164 patients (4.2 %) experienced psychiatric decompensation with or without memory deterioration after RF-TC of bilateral or unilateral amygdala and hippocampus. The appearance of symptoms was either acute, subacute, or chronic and the symptoms were either transient or lasted for several months. Common features among these patients were female sex, mesial temporal epilepsy, and a pre-existing history of psychological distress and memory dysfunction. Our study highlights the possibility of neuropsychiatric deterioration in specific patients following SEEG-guided RF-TC, despite its rarity.