Near-cure in patients with Gadolinium deposition disease undergoing intravenous DTPA chelation.

Purpose: To demonstrate and evaluate factors contributing to near-cures in patients with Gadolinium Deposition Disease (GDD) undergoing intravenous (IV) DTPA chelation. Methods: Patients who had undergone or are currently undergoing DTPA chelation for GDD were included in this report based on their medical records that showed their perceived improvement was at least 80% back to normal. A survey was developed that included factors commonly reported by patients treated in one clinic to determine if these 'near-cured' (pre-MRI baseline health) individuals possessed certain factors and lacked others. The anonymized survey was emailed to these individuals by the principal treating physician, the only investigator not blinded to the subjects. This report describes clinical documentation of patient status and their underlying factors in individuals treated by the primary author, and no research was performed. The survey was sent to sixteen individuals; Fourteen patients completed it (10 females; 41.1 ± 11.2 y/o). Results: The most common factor was the administration of ≤5 lifetime doses of a Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents (GBCA) (12/14). Unconfounded agents triggering GDD were seen in nine subjects. Most subjects (12/14) initiated chelation in the first year after the causative GBCA, and most (11/14) underwent ≤10 chelations with DTPA. Good healthcare status prior to MRI was observed in 5 subjects. The majority (11/14) described their immune status as strong. Severe physical disability prior to chelation was seen in 1. Conclusion: Subjects with GDD can experience near-cure with IV DTPA chelation. Factors surveyed that predict near-cure include the start of chelation in the first year, few GBCA administrations, and good health status before MRI with GBCA injection. Nonetheless, a few patients with predictors of less successful outcomes still experienced near-cure.

Differences in hypersensitivity reactions and gadolinium deposition disease/symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents: new insights based on global databases VigiBase, FAERS, and IQVIA-MIDAS.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) can occur unexpectedly and be life-threatening when gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used. Gadolinium deposition disease (GDD) and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure (SAGE) have been controversial for a long time. However, similar studies are currently incomplete or outdated. Therefore, comparing the safety of different GBCAs in terms of HSRs and GDD/SAGE using the latest post-marketing safety data should yield further insights into safely using GBCAs. METHODS: The safety differences between all GBCAs to GDD and the spectrum of GBCA-related HSRs were all compared and analyzed by using the World Health Organization database VigiBase and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database in this study. A further analysis of SAGE was also conducted using FAERS data. The lower limit of the reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% confidence interval was used for signal detection. Moreover, the frequency of HSRs was calculated by dividing the number of reports in VigiBase by the total sales volume (measured in millions) from 2008 to 2022 in the IQVIA Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System. All adverse events were standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 26.0. RESULTS: This study shows that all GBCAs have the potential to induce HSRs, with nonionic linear GBCAs exhibiting a comparatively lower signal. According to standardized MedDRA query stratification analysis, gadobutrol had a greater ROR025 for angioedema. The ROR025 of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoteridol is larger for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock conditions. Regarding severe cutaneous adverse reactions, only gadoversetamide and gadodiamide showed signals in FAERS and VigiBase. There were also differences in the frequency of HSRs between regions. Regarding GDD, gadoterate meglumine, and gadoteridol had a lower ROR025. An analysis of the 29 preferred terms linked to SAGE indicated that special consideration should be given to the risk of skin induration associated with gadoversetamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoteridol. Additionally, gadodiamide and gadoteridol pose a greater risk of skin tightness compared to other GBCAs. CONCLUSIONS: The risk differences among GBCAs using data from several sources were compared in this study. However, as a hypothesis-generating method, a clear causal relationship would require further research and validation.

Evaluation of signal intensity changes in dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on magnetic resonance imaging after intrathecal gadolinium-based contrast agent administration.

PURPOSE: Gadolinium deposition has been reported in several normal anatomical structures in the brain after repeated administration of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study presents preliminary results to see if there is any gadolinium deposition in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus after using intrathecal GBCAs. METHODS: Between November 2018 and November 2020, 29 patients who underwent intrathecal contrast-enhanced MR cisternography with the suspicion of rhinorrhea were included in this prospective study. In contrast-enhanced MR cisternography, gadoterate meglumine was administered by intrathecal injection at a dose of 1 ml. One month later, patients had a control MRI with 3D T1 SPACE fat-saturated (FS) and susceptibility weighted images (SWI) sequences. The ratio of dentate nucleus signal intensity to middle cerebellar peduncle signal intensity (DN/MCP ratio) and the ratio of globus pallidus signal intensity to thalamus signal intensity (GP/T ratio) were calculated using region of interest (ROI) on pre-contrast and control MRI sequences. RESULTS: There was no significant difference for DN/MCP ratio and GP/T ratio on 3D T1 SPACE FS and SWI sequences after intrathecal GBCAs administration compared to baseline MRI. CONCLUSION: Administration of intrathecal GBCAs did not cause a measurable change in the signal intensity of the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus after a single injection.

Gadolinium deposition in the liver and brain in a rat model with liver fibrosis after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium.

Objectives: To investigate gadolinium deposition in the liver and brain in a rat model with liver fibrosis (LF) after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium (GD) and the histological effects of gadolinium deposition in the liver and brain. Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 1) LF group received intraperitoneal injection of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for 9 weeks alone; 2) LF&GD group received CCl4 and intravenous administration of GD (for 5 consecutive days); 3) GD group received olive oil and GD. Seven days after the final injection of GD, the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) and liver were excised to determine gadolinium concentrations via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and histologic staining was performed. Bonferroni's post-hoc test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare the differences between the three groups. Results: The concentrations of retained gadolinium in the liver in the LF&GD group (2.18 ± 0.44 µg/g) were significantly greater compared to the LF group (0.02 ± 0.01 µg/g, P < 0.001) and GD group (0.37 ± 0.11 µg/g, P < 0.001). Also, the concentrations of retained gadolinium in DCN were increased in the LF&GD group (0.13 ± 0.06 µg/g) compared to the LF group (0.01 ± 0.00 µg/g, P < 0.001) and GD group (0.06 ± 0.02 µg/g, P = 0.019). No histopathological alterations were detected in the liver and DCN between LF&GD group and LF group. Conclusions: LF aggravated gadolinium deposition in the liver and DCN after administration of GD. However, no significant acute histological alterations were observed due to gadolinium deposition.

T1 mapping technique for evaluating myocardial gadolinium deposition in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy / 中国医学影像技术

Objective To observe the feasibility of T1 mapping technique for evaluating myocardial gadolinium deposition in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(AHCM).Methods Data of 60 AHCM patients were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into enhanced group and control group according to underwent gadolinium-based contrast agent(GBCA)enhanced examination or not(each n=30).Myocardial T1 value at the basal,middle and apical myocardium of the left ventricle as well as spleen T1 at the same layers were measured.T1 relative-value(T1R)was calculated and then compared between groups and among different parts of left ventricle in enhanced group.T1R in enhanced group were further analyzed based on gender,age,body mass index,cardiac function,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,diabetes,apical thickness,ejection fraction,delayed enhancement and interval time from the first enhanced examination to the last review and total dose of GBCA.Results No significant difference of T1Rbasal,T1Rmiddle nor T1Rapical was found between groups(t=0.329,1.484,0.720,all P＞0.05),nor of T1R in different parts of left ventricle within enhanced group(F=0.765,P＞0.05).In enhanced group,significant differences of myocardial T1R was found between different genders as well as patients with or without hypertension(both P＜0.05).Conclusion T1 mapping technology could be used for evaluating myocardial gadolinium deposition in patients with AHCM.

Reliability of signal intensity in the basal ganglia on non-contrast T1-weighted MR scans after repetitive application of a gadolinium-based contrast agent in pediatric neuro-oncology patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of signal intensity (SI) changes in the basal ganglia as a supposed indicator of gadolinium deposition in the brain after repetitive application of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in a pediatric neuro-oncological collective. METHODS: One hundred and eight neuropediatric patients (54 male, 54 female, 0-17 years old), with repetitive GBCA-enhanced cranial MRIs between 2003 and 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists measured SI in the nucleus dentatus (ND), globus pallidus (GP), thalamus (T), and the pons (P). The NDP and GPT ratio were calculated. An intraclass correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regressions with subsequent stepwise backward variable selection were performed to evaluate the influence of gender, patient's age at the first MRI, time interval between the first and last MRI, linear or macrocyclic GBCAs, residual pathology, treatments, and magnet field strengths. RESULTS: The inter-reader agreement was good for GPT and NDP in the whole collective (ICC = 0.837 and ICC = 0.793) and for children >2 years of age (ICC = 0.874 and ICC = 0.790), but poor to moderate for children ≤2 years of age (ICC = 0.397 and ICC = 0.748). The intra-reader agreement was good (ICC = 0.910 and ICC = 0.882). An SI increase was only observed for both readers in GPT (p = 0.003, or p < 0.001). None of the considered cofactors showed a consistent effect on SI changes for either readers or regions. CONCLUSION: Measurements of SI changes in the basal ganglia are not a reliable parameter with which to evaluate or estimate gadolinium deposition in the brain or to identify suspicious influential factors after repeated GBCA applications.

Update on Gadolinium Based Contrast Agent Safety, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media.

Since its introduction 35 years ago, gadolinium-enhanced MRI has fundamentally changed medical practice. While extraordinarily safe, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) may have side effects. Four distinct safety considerations include: acute allergic-like reactions, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), gadolinium deposition, and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure. Acute reactions after GBCA administration are uncommon-far less than with iodinated contrast agents-and, while rare, serious reactions can occur. NSF is a rare, but serious, scleroderma-like condition occurring in patients with kidney failure after exposure to American College of Radiology (ACR) Group 1 GBCAs. Group 2 and 3 GBCAs are considered lower risk, and, through their use, NSF has largely been eliminated. Unrelated to NSF, retention of trace amounts of gadolinium in the brain and other organs has been recognized for over a decade. Deposition occurs with all agents, although linear agents appear to deposit more than macrocyclic agents. Importantly, to date, no data demonstrate any adverse biologic or clinical effects from gadolinium deposition, even with normal kidney function. This article summarizes the latest safety evidence of commercially available GBCAs with a focus on new agents, discusses updates to the ACR NSF GBCA safety classification, and describes approaches for strengthening the evidence needed for regulatory decisions.

Where does the gadolinium go? A review into the excretion and retention of intravenous gadolinium.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are commonly used in medical imaging. Most intravenously (IV) administered gadolinium is excreted via the kidneys, and pathological retention in renal failure leading to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is well described. More recently, retention of gadolinium in the body in the absence of renal disease has been identified, with unknown clinical consequences. Many patients are aware of this, either through the media or via comprehensive consent documentation. Some internet sites, without hard evidence, have suggested a constellation of possible symptoms associated with GBCA retention. Recent experience with patients ascribing symptoms to a contrast-enhanced MRI examination prompted this review of the fate of injected GBCA after MRI study, and of information available to patients online regarding gadolinium retention.

Reducing Gadolinium Exposure in Patients Undergoing Monitoring for Meningiomas.

Background Due to the non-malignant and slow-growing nature of many meningiomas, surveillance with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as an acceptable management plan. However, repeated imaging with gold-standard contrast-based studies may lead to contrast-associated adverse effects. Non-gadolinium T2 sequences may serve as a suitable alternative without the risk of adverse effects of contrast. Thus, this study sought to investigate the agreement between post-contrast T1 and non-gadolinium T2 MRI sequences in the measurement of meningioma growth. Methodology The Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (VCU SOM) brain tumor database was used to create a cohort of meningioma patients and determine the number of patients who had T1 post-contrast imaging accompanied by readily measurable imaging from either T2 fast spin echo (FSE) or T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. Measurements of the largest axial and perpendicular diameters of each tumor were conducted by two independent observers using T1 post-contrast, T2 FSE, and T2 FLAIR imaging series. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability between observers and agreement between measurements of tumor diameter among the different imaging sequences. Results In total, 33 patients (average age = 72.1 ± 12.9 years, 90% female) with meningiomas were extracted from our database, with 22 (66.7%) undergoing T1 post-contrast imaging accompanied with readily measurable imaging from T2 FSE and/or T2 FLAIR sequences. The inter-rater reliability between the measurements of T1 axial and perpendicular diameters was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.92-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.83-0.97), respectively. The inter-rater reliability between the measurements of T2 axial perpendicular diameters was 0.93 (95% = CI 0.92-0.97) and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.74-0.95), respectively. The agreements between the measurement of T1 and T2 FSE axial diameter by each observer were 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.81-0.97). The agreements between the measurements of T1 and T2 FSE perpendicular diameter measurements by each observer were 0.98 (95% CI = 0.95-0.99) and 0.88 (95% CI = 0.73-0.95). Conclusions Two-thirds of our patients had meningiomas that were readily measurable on either T2 FSE or T2 FLAIR sequences. Additionally, there was excellent inter-rater reliability between the observers in our study as well as an agreement between individual measurements of T1 post-contrast and T2 FSE tumor diameters. These findings suggest that T2 FSE may serve as a safe and similarly effective surveillance method for the long-term management of meningioma patients.

MRI detection of brain gadolinium retention in multiple sclerosis: Magnetization transfer vs. T1-weighted imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evidence of brain gadolinium retention has affected gadolinium-based contrast agent usage. It is, however, unclear to what extent macrocyclic agents are retained and whether their in vivo detection may necessitate nonconventional MRI. Magnetization transfer (MT) could prove suitable to detect gadolinium-related signal changes since dechelated gadolinium ions bind to macromolecules. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate associations of prior gadolinium administrations with MT and T1 signal abnormalities. METHODS: A cohort of 23 persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) (18 females, 5 males, 57 ± 8.0 years) with multiple past gadolinium administrations (median 6, range 3-12) and 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent 1.5 Tesla MRI with MT, T1-weighted 2-dimensional spin echo, and T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient echo. The signal intensity index was assessed by MRI in gadolinium retention predilection sites. RESULTS: There were dose-dependent associations of the globus pallidus signal on gradient echo (r = .55, p < .001) and spin echo (r = .38, p = .013) T1-weighted imaging, but not on MT. Relative to controls, MS patients had higher signal intensity index in the dentate nucleus on T1-weighted gradient echo (1.037 ± 0.040 vs. 1.016 ± 0.023, p = .04) with a similar trend in the globus pallidus on T1-weighted spin echo (1.091 ± 0.034 vs. 1.076 ± 0.014, p = .06). MT detected no group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional T1-weighted imaging provided dose-dependent associations with gadolinium administrations in MS, while these could not be detected with 2-dimensional MT. Future studies could explore newer MT techniques like 3D and inhomogenous MT. Notably, these associations were identified with conventional MRI even though most patients had not received gadolinium administrations in the preceding 9 years, suggestive of long-term retention.

Brain MRI and clinical exam findings in women with multiple gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) exposures due to screening breast MRIs.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple exposures to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is known to be associated with gadolinium deposition in the brain in certain patients. Such deposition has been correlated with specific brain MRI findings, although most available data is in patients with underlying neurologic disorders. We aim to prospectively evaluate brain MRI signal changes as well as neurologic and neuropsychologic testing results in women undergoing screening breast MRI. METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 9 women with 5 or more exposures to linear and/or macrocyclic GBCA due to screening breast MRI underwent noncontrast brain MRI, neurologic exam and neuropsychologic testing. Women with underlying neurologic, psychologic, hepatic or renal disorders were excluded. RESULTS: The mean total number of GBCA exposures was 8 (standard deviation 2.7), with 63/72 (87%) of the exposures being linear agents. There was no association between brain MRI signal changes and abnormalities on neurologic or neuropsychologic examination. There was no association between total number of GBCA exposures and abnormalities on neurologic or neuropsychologic examination. CONCLUSION: In this prospective exploratory study of 9 women with 5 or more GBCA exposures due to screening breast MRI, there was no association between brain MRI signal changes and clinical abnormalities on neurologic or neuropsychologic examination. While larger studies are needed in this patient population, the lack of clinical impact of multiple GBCA exposures in this study is reassuring.

Gadolinium Retention after Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narratative Review.

Over the past five years, several studies have reported deposition and retention of gadolinium in the brain after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) during radiological procedures. Patients with renal insufficiency cannot filter gadolinium efficiently; however, gadolinium is also retained in the brain of some adults and pediatrics with no renal impairment. In the literature, data is mostly available from retrospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, where gadolinium deposition may be indirectly measured by evaluating changes in T1 signal intensity in the brain tissues, particularly in the deep gray matter such as the dentate nucleus and/or globus pallidus. Many pathological studies have reported a direct correlation between T1 signal changes and gadolinium deposition in human and animal autopsy specimens, which raised concerns on the use of GBCAs, particularly with linear chelators. The association between gadolinium accumulation and occurrence of physical and neurological side effects or neurotoxic damage has not yet been conclusively demonstrated. Studies have also observed that gadolinium is deposited in the extracranial tissues, such as the liver, skin, and bone, of patients with normal kidney function. This narrative review describes the effects of different types of GBCAs in relation to gadolinium deposition, evaluates current evidence on gadolinium deposition in various tissues of the human body, and summarizes the current recommendations regarding the use of GBCAs.

Monthly triple-dose gadolinium administration: potential associations with leukopenia, hypophosphatemia, and bone marrow T1 hyperintensity.

OBJECTIVE: Monthly scanning with triple-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine has been shown to be associated with progressive increases in bone T1 hyperintensity, hypophosphatemia, and leukopenia. This study was performed to retrospectively investigate the potential associations among these phenomena. METHODS: This retrospective analysis involved patients who had received monthly triple-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for up to 2 years as part of treatment for multiple sclerosis. Monthly magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain (n = 67) were segmented to evaluate the signal intensity in the cranial marrow. Potential associations among the marrow T1 hyperintensity, serum phosphate concentration, and white blood cell count were examined. RESULTS: Patients in the no leukopenia group showed a statistically significant mean monthly increase in the bone marrow signal-to-noise ratio of 0.0430/month. Patients in the leukopenia group showed a mean monthly increase in the bone marrow signal-to-noise ratio of 0.0398/month, but this was not statistically significant. Patients in the hypophosphatemia group were significantly less likely to develop leukopenia than patients who had never developed hypophosphatemia. CONCLUSIONS: Although monthly administration of triple-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine over 13 months has been associated with progressive increases in leukopenia, hypophosphatemia, and T1 signal intensity of bone, this study showed an inverse relationship between leukopenia and hypophosphatemia.

Contrast Enhancement of the Normal Infundibular Recess Using Heavily T2-weighted 3D FLAIR.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate contrast enhancement of the infundibular recess in the normal state using heavily T2-weighted 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) (HT2-FLAIR). METHODS: Twenty-six patients were retrospectively recruited. We subjectively assessed overall contrast enhancement of the infundibular recess between postcontrast, 4-hour (4-h) delayed postcontrast, and precontrast HT2-FLAIR images. We also objectively conducted chronological and spatial comparisons by measuring the signal intensity (SI) ratio (SIR). Chronological comparisons were performed by comparing SI of the infundibular recess/SI of the midbrain (SIRIR-MB). Spatial comparisons were conducted by comparing SI on postcontrast HT2-FLAIR/SI on precontrast HT2-FLAIR (SIRPost-Pre) of the infundibular recess with that of other cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces, including the superior part of the third ventricle, lateral ventricles, fourth ventricle, and interpeduncular cistern. RESULTS: In the subjective analysis, all cases showed contrast enhancement of the infundibular recess on both postcontrast and 4-h delayed postcontrast HT2-FLAIR, and showed weaker contrast enhancement of the infundibular recess on 4-h delayed postcontrast HT2-FLAIR than on postcontrast HT2-FLAIR. In the objective analysis, SIRIR-MB was the highest on postcontrast images, followed by 4-h delayed postcontrast images. SIRPost-Pre was significantly higher in the infundibular recess than in the other CSF spaces. CONCLUSION: The present results demonstrated that the infundibular recess was enhanced on HT2-FLAIR after an intravenous gadolinium injection. The infundibular recess may be a potential source of the leakage of intravenously administered gadolinium into the CSF.

Effects of Gadolinium Depositions in Vivo.

PURPOSE: To explain the kinetics of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), where they leave deposits, and whether they ever leave the body. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using databases such as Academic Search Premier, EBSCO Host, PubMed, Radiological Society of North America, and Google Scholar. Studies pertaining to various GBCAs, their depositions, and their adverse effects were reported. RESULTS: GBCAs were deposited in the skin, brain, dentate nucleus, globus pallidus, and thalamus. Common adverse effects of GBCAs included headache, joint pain, torso pain, weakness and fatigue, and cloudy mentation. DISCUSSION: GBCAs should be avoided when not necessary, and the physician ordering the contrast should understand the benefits vs the risks for each patient. Although there is evidence of depositions of GBCA, it remains clinically acceptable to administer this contrast when there is an indication. The clinical indication for the GBCA, the type of agent, the dose, and other important information should be documented in the patient's medical record after administration. CONCLUSION: The effects of gadolinium retention are still not understood fully and require future investigation. This literature review helped to show that all GBCAs-linear, nonionic, ionic, and macrocyclic contrast agents-leave deposits in the brain that show up on medical images. Further research should be conducted to assess possible links between depositions in the body and adverse effects.

Evaluation of the effect of multiple administrations of gadopentetate dimeglumine or gadoterate meglumine on brain T1-weighted hyperintensity in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Repeated administrations of linear gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) are associated with T1-weighted (T1-W) signal intensity change in brain structures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare different brain structures in children after unconfounded, repeated administrations of either a macrocyclic or linear GBCM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, identifying subjects with ≥5 unconfounded administrations of gadoterate meglumine. We matched subjects with repeated administrations of gadopentetate dimeglumine to the gadoterate meglumine arm based on the number of unconfounded GBCM administrations. Two reviewers drew regions of interest on 27 structures in and around the brain. We recorded demographic, modality and study parameters and evaluated them to determine whether they were associated with T1-W signal intensity (SI) changes. Linear mixed effects models evaluated the relationships between the number of GBCM doses and T1-W SI ratio. Finally, we identified differences in the rate of T1-W SI ratio change among individuals using a linear mixed effects model with random slope. RESULTS: We included a total of 52 patients (age range at first MRI: 6.0 months to 17.1 years), 26 in each arm. We detected a significant change in the T1-W SI ratio with repeated administrations of GBCM in one location in the gadoterate meglumine arm and in four locations in the gadopentetate dimeglumine arm. Patient gender and age were not associated with T1-W SI change. Modality vendor, imaging sequence and field strength were variably associated with a systematic difference in the ability to detect a T1-W SI change. Finally, linear mixed effects model with random slope showed that there were individual differences in the slope of SI change at various structures among individuals for both arms. This effect was present in more brain structures in the gadopentetate dimeglumine arm (14 vs. 8). CONCLUSION: There is a significant change in the T1-W SI ratio over time in multiple brain structures after repeated gadopentetate dimeglumine administrations. This effect was only seen in one ratio after repeated administrations of gadoterate meglumine. There are individual differences in the rate of change of SI ratios over time after repeated administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoterate meglumine, suggesting that individual differences are present.

Safety issues related to intravenous contrast agent use in magnetic resonance imaging.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have been used to improve image quality of MRI examinations for decades and have an excellent overall safety record. However, there are well-documented risks associated with GBCAs and our understanding and management of these risks continue to evolve. The purpose of this review is to discuss the safety of GBCAs used in MRI in adult and pediatric populations. We focus particular attention on acute adverse reactions, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium deposition. We also discuss the non-GBCA MRI contrast agent ferumoxytol, which is increasing in use and has its own risk profile. Finally, we identify special populations at higher risk of harm from GBCA administration.