GAD65 Antibody Epitopes and Genetic Background in Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Youth (LADY).

Epitope-specific GAD65Abs and HLA-DR-DQ gene assays help improve the value of risk stratification in autoimmune diabetes mellitus and protect islet function. Identification and early intervention are important for latent autoimmune diabetes in youth (LADY). The aims of this study were to investigate 1) the frequencies of the epitope-specific GAD65Abs and HLA-DR-DQ genes in LADY and 2) the association between HLA-DR-DQ genes and epitope-specific GAD65Abs. Higher frequencies of GAD65-CAb and multiepitope GAD65Abs were observed in young type 1 diabetes, LADY, and old type 1 diabetes subjects than those in latent autoimmune diabetes in adult (LADA) patients. The frequencies of the specific susceptible HLA haplotype DR3, total susceptible HLA haplotypes, and high-risk genotypes were higher in type 1 diabetes and LADY patients than those in LADA patients. In contrast, type 1 diabetes and LADY patients had lower frequencies of low/no genetic risk genotypes (DRX/X) than those of LADA patients. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the susceptible HLA haplotypes were risk factors for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) multiepitope positivity in autoimmune diabetes mellitus. LADY may be more severe than LADA, and LADY seemed to be a transitional type of type 1 diabetes and LADA. GADA epitope and HLA-DR-DQ gene assays are important for risk stratification in autoimmune diabetes mellitus and protection of islet function.

Frequency, clinical features, inflammatory cytokines and genetic background of latent autoimmune diabetes in youth in youth-onset type 2 diabetes: Results from a nationwide, multicentre, clinic-based, cross-sectional study (LADA China).

AIM: To investigate the frequency, clinical phenotype, inflammatory cytokine levels and genetics of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA)-positive phenotypic youth-onset type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide, multicentre, cross-sectional study included 5324 newly diagnosed subjects with phenotypic type 2 diabetes aged 15 years or older enrolled in the LADA China study. GADA was screened in 248 subjects with youth-onset type 2 diabetes aged 15-29 years. Subjects who presented as GADA-positive were defined as having latent autoimmune diabetes in youth (LADY). We added subjects with LADY, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and controls from the Diabetes Center of Central South University, and measured serum concentrations of interleukin-6, lipocalin 2, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, adiponectin and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping in subjects with LADY, age- and sex-matched GADA-negative type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes and controls. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of the 248 subjects (11.7%) were GADA positive. Compared with subjects with type 2 diabetes, subjects with LADY were less probable to have metabolic syndrome (27.6% vs. 59.4%; p = .001). The fasting C-peptide levels tended to be lower in subjects with LADY than in subjects with type 2 diabetes, but the difference was not statistically significant (LADY vs. type 2 diabetes: 0.21 [0.17-0.64] vs. 0.47 [0.29-0.77] nmol/L; p = .11). The cytokine levels of subjects with LADY were indistinguishable from subjects with type 1 diabetes, but subjects with LADY presented increased adiponectin levels compared with subjects with type 2 diabetes after adjusting for age, sex and body mass index (7.19 [4.05-11.66] vs. 3.42 [2.35-5.74] µg/mL; p < .05). The frequency of total susceptible HLA genotypes (DR3/3, -3/9 and -9/9) in subjects with LADY and type 1 diabetes were similarly higher than controls (LADY and type 1 diabetes vs. controls: 21.4% and 30.8% vs. 2.6%, respectively; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A high GADA positivity was observed in youth-onset type 2 diabetes subjects in China. As subjects with LADY had an increased susceptible HLA genetic load and different cytokine levels compared with subjects with type 2 diabetes, differentiating LADY from phenotypic type 2 diabetes subjects is important.

Prevalence of diabetes-associated autoantibodies among patients presenting with type 2 diabetes and related metabolic differences.

BACKGROUND: To explores the prevalence of autoantibodies (zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (ZnT8A), antibodies to insulin (IAAs), glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GAD65)), the relation of the type of positive autoantibody and the number of positive autoantibodies with the glycemic and lipid profile of the patients with LADA (Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults) and compares it to the metabolic profile of patients presenting with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: 263 patients with T2DM were recruited for this cross-sectional study in Tehran, Iran. Data from patients included complete medical history, GAD65, ZnT8A, IAA and routine metabolic laboratory workup. Assay for autoantibodies were conducted using ELISA kits. The association between autoantibodies and glycemic and lipid profile of patients with diabetes was assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Our study revealed that among 263 patients with T2DM, 29 (11%) cases were positive for IAAs, 9 (3.4%) for ZnT8A, and 12 (4.6%) for GAD65. Six (2.3%) of the patients had triple positive antibodies. Patients with positive results were younger, had lower body mass index (BMI), c-peptide, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL), HbA1c and fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels. Triple antibody positivity was significantly associated with lower levels of C-Peptide, Triglycerides, FBG, and HbA1c compared to triple negative antibodies. CONCLUSION: Patients with LADA positive for either of the autoantibodies (GAD65, ZnT8 and IAA) presented with worse glycemic control. Measurement of these autoantibodies can assist in discrimination of these patients and help with earlier control of glycemic profile.

Coxsackievirus B1 infections are associated with the initiation of insulin-driven autoimmunity that progresses to type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Islet autoimmunity usually starts with the appearance of autoantibodies against either insulin (IAA) or GAD65 (GADA). This categorises children with preclinical type 1 diabetes into two immune phenotypes, which differ in their genetic background and may have different aetiology. The aim was to study whether Coxsackievirus group B (CVB) infections, which have been linked to the initiation of islet autoimmunity, are associated with either of these two phenotypes in children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. METHODS: All samples were from children in the Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention (DIPP) study. Individuals are recruited to the DIPP study from the general population of new-born infants who carry defined HLA genotypes associated with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Our study cohort included 91 children who developed IAA and 78 children who developed GADA as their first appearing single autoantibody and remained persistently seropositive for islet autoantibodies, along with 181 and 151 individually matched autoantibody negative control children, respectively. Seroconversion to positivity for neutralising antibodies was detected as the surrogate marker of CVB infections in serial follow-up serum samples collected before and at the appearance of islet autoantibodies in each individual. RESULTS: CVB1 infections were associated with the appearance of IAA as the first autoantibody (OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.4, 4.2], corrected p = 0.018). CVB5 infection also tended to be associated with the appearance of IAA, however, this did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.3, [0.7, 7.5], p = 0.163); no other CVB types were associated with increased risk of IAA. Children who had signs of a CVB1 infection either alone or prior to infections by other CVBs were at the highest risk for developing IAA (OR 5.3 [95% CI 2.4, 11.7], p < 0.001). None of the CVBs were associated with the appearance of GADA. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: CVB1 infections may contribute to the initiation of islet autoimmunity being particularly important in the insulin-driven autoimmune process.

Development of a novel ultrasensitive enzyme immunoassay for human glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 antibody.

BACKGROUND: We developed a novel, ultrasensitive enzyme immunoassay (immune complex transfer enzyme immunoassay) for determination of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody concentrations in serum samples from patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We developed an immune complex transfer enzyme immunoassay for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody and measured glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody from 22 patients with type 1 diabetes, 29 patients with type 2 diabetes, and 32 healthy controls. RESULTS: A conventional ELISA kit identified 10 patients with type 1 diabetes and one patient with type 2 diabetes as glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody positive, whereas 15 patients with type 1 diabetes and six patients with type 2 diabetes were identified as glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody positive using immune complex transfer enzyme immunoassay. CONCLUSIONS: Immune complex transfer enzyme immunoassay is a highly sensitive and specific assay for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody and might be clinically useful for diabetic onset prediction and early diagnosis.

Role of Detecting GADA and ZnT8A in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients / 现代检验医学杂志

Objective To analysis the positive rates of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA)and zinc transporter 8 autoantibody (ZnT8A)in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients.Methods GADA and ZnT8A were detected in 101 ca-ses of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using ELISA.Results The positive rate of GADA was 21.78%,the positive rate of ZnT8A was 17.82%,and the common positive rate of GADA and ZnT8A was 8.91%.There were no corre-lations between GADA or ZnT8A autoantibodies and the patient’s sex (t=-0.724,-0.550;0.903,1.359,P >0.05),age (t=-0.724,-0.550;0.903,1.359,P >0.05),blood glucose (r=0.290,0.110;-0.264,-0.047,P >0.05),cholesterol (r=-0.047,0.004;0.154,-0.138,P >0.05),triglyceride (r=-0.092,-0.054;-0.217,-0.023,P >0.05),and low density lipoprotein (r= - 0.045,- 0.027;0.202,- 0.025,P > 0.05).Conclusion It should be screened autoantibodies timely for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients in order to diagnosis the Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults early.