A prognostic classification of proximal humerus fractures: the cephalic extension staging.

PURPOSE: Recent publications emphasized the role of dorsomedial metaphyseal extension of humeral head as predictor of ischemia after complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). We evaluated on preoperative 3D CT scan of PHFs the surface of this metaphyseal extension and its prognostic value on the occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN). METHODS: We followed a series of 25 fixations of complex PHF which had a preoperative 3D CT scan and measured the surface area of the posterior metaphyseal extension (PME) of the head. Using approximations, we calculated the ratio between the PME surface area (PMS) and the articular surface area of the head (HS). The PMS/HS ratio was analyzed against the risk of AVN. RESULTS: The measurement of the PMS/HS ratio emphasizes the significance of PME. The incidence of AVN is correlated with the magnitude of PME. Therefore, we include the PME as a fifth element in the characterization of complex PHFs and we propose a 4-stage prognostic classification based on the number of extensions of the humeral head. The head may have 3 extensions: posteromedial (PME), lesser tuberosity (LTE) and greater tuberosity (GTE). The risk of AVN decreases with the number of extensions of the head. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a correlation between the occurrence of AVN and the size of PME in complex PHF cases. We propose a four-stage classification system to facilitate treatment decision-making between fixation and prosthesis.

Therapy preference of 131 parents confronted with a pediatric femoral fracture.

Background: The management of femoral fractures in children between 3 and 5 years of age is still vividly debated. Therefore, we aimed to assess the basic attitude of parents if confronted with a hypothetical femoral fracture of their toddler. Materials and methods: Parents of children aged between 12 and 36 months were asked for their preference after receiving detailed information on conservative and surgical treatment of femoral shaft fractures. Furthermore, we obtained information regarding the parents' gender, marital status, medical background, highest level of education and profession in a leading or non-leading position and if any of their children already had undergone any operations. The Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI-R) questionnaire was used to assess parents' personality traits. Results: In total, 131 participants were included in this study. The vast majority (n = 116, 88.5%) preferred surgical treatment. The most frequently mentioned reasons for this decision were lack of acceptance, followed by faster reconvalescence, shorter hospital stay, less deformity or growth disorders and less stress on the child. The only reason stated against surgical treatment was the need of general anesthesia. A significantly higher rate of conservative procedures was noticed in self-employed participants and stress was found to significantly influence the treatment decision of the parents toward conservative treatment. Conclusion: The majority of parents confronted with a hypothetical femoral fracture of their child questioned in this study opted for a surgical approach with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). This corresponds with trends toward surgery in these cases in major trauma centers in Europe.

Protective and Risk Factors for Humerus Head Necrosis After Proximal Humerus Fracture Treated with Internal Locking Plate.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common and lead to post-traumatic humerus head necrosis (HHN) in 3-35% after ORIF with an internal locking plate. Few studies focus on this condition and risk factors remain a discussion topic. Hertel's criteria for initial head ischemia right after fracture (fracture complexity, medial hinge displacement and short metaphyseal head extension) have recently been correlated to HHN, but there is still a clear lack of evidence on the topic. Due to its anatomical similarities to the proximal femur, some authors argue that PHF may as well benefit from early surgery to avoid head necrosis. METHODS: In this 10-year retrospective study, we assessed 305 patients from a single center. All cases were treated with a PHILOS plate through a deltopectoral approach. The mean follow-up time was 467 days. The primary endpoint was HHN. RESULTS: HHN was diagnosed in 12 patients (4%), 10 of which were diagnosed within the first year and one case 4 years after surgery. A positive correlation (p < 0.04) was found between HHN and fracture type (both in AO and Neer's classification), initial neck-shaft-angle (NSA) and metaphyseal head extension (MHE). Medial hinge displacement (MHD) occurred in all HHN cases. Achieving perfect reduction (< 2 mm dislocation) was relevant to avoiding HHN (p = 0.035). Although HHN developed in 32% of the high risk cases (four-part fractures with a short MHE), it was completely avoided (0%) when perfect reduction was achieved. Time until surgery after admission was neither a protective nor a risk factor for HHN. CONCLUSION: We conclude that fracture complexity (four-part and C-fractures) as well as disruption of the medial hinge with a metaphyseal head extension smaller than 8 mm are relevant risk factors for humerus head necrosis. A combination of these criteria generated an high risk pattern with a 32% rate of HHN. Though often difficult to achieve, perfect reduction was a clear protective factor and reduced HHN to 0%. Perfect reduction may be key to inosculation and, therefore, salvage of the humerus head, especially in high risk cases. Surgery timing did not correlate with HHN. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

Principles of Subglottic and Tracheal Visualization with Transnasal Flexible Laryngoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The subglottic area and trachea are important parts of the upper airway, and can be visualized easily using transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TFL). The aim of this study was to develop a clinical grading system to assist in documentation of the subglottic area and trachea with TFL, and to demonstrate the basic principles of visualization of these anatomic areas as a laryngology practice. METHODS: The TFL videos of 100 randomized patients were evaluated by three laryngologists. The simple head extension (SHE) position and flexion position (FP) were applied to the patients during the visualization of the subglottic area and trachea. A paired t test was used to compare the grades of the subglottic and tracheal view according to the SHE and FP scores. RESULTS: This study examined 50 male and 50 female patients ranging in age from 28 to 83 years (mean age: 50.09 ± 13.05 years). For the SHE and FP, the numbers of patients constituting grade 1 were 2 and 35, grade 2 were 2 and 37, grade 3 were 30 and 19, and grade 4 were 41 and 9, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between SHE and FP (P  <  0.05). The k score was 0.785 between the ratings of observer 1 and observer 2; 0.771 between observer 1 and observer 3; and 0.757 between observer 2 and observer 3 (P  <  0.001). CONCLUSION: This new grading system for the visualization of the subglottis and trachea can help physicians assess and identify the upper airways, and FP provides a better subglottic and tracheal view than SHE.

Optimal Position for Transnasal Flexible Laryngoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TFL) is a simple, safe, and cost-effective procedure. TFL is routinely performed to awake patients in a sitting position but there is no a definite data about ideal head and neck position to be applied. The aim of this study is to determine which position is most appropriate to obtain the best laryngeal view during the TFL. METHODS: The TFL videos of 132 randomized patients were evaluated by three blind observers experienced with laryngology. Three basic head positions; simple head extension (SHE), sniffing position (SP), and neutral position (NP) were performed during the TFL-Interobserver agreements for the grading system scores were assessed by using the kappa (k) statistic. RESULTS: For the SHE and SP, the numbers of patients constituting grade 1 were 127 (96.2%) and 126 (95.5%), respectively, while grade 2a were 5 (3.8%) and 6 (4.5%), respectively. In NP, the number of patients constituting grade 1 was 5 (3.8%), while grade 2a was 83 (62.9%), grade 2b was 37 (28%), and grade 3 was 7 (5.3%). The k score of the SHE was 0.826 (P < 0.001) between the ratings of observer 1 and observer 2, 0.905 (P < 0.001) between observer 1 and observer 3, and 0.919 (P < 0.001) between observer 2 and observer 3. These values denote nearly perfect agreement. A complete agreement was seen in 130 of the 132 (98.48%) videos. CONCLUSION: SHE and SP both provide a better glottic view than the NP and demonstrate the same success.

A Randomized Study Comparing the Sniffing Position with Simple Head Extension for Glottis Visualization and Difficulty in Intubation during Direct Laryngoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Proper positioning of the head and neck is important for an optimal laryngeal visualization. Traditionally, sniffing position (SP) is recommended to provide a superior glottic visualization, during direct laryngoscopy, enhancing the ease of intubation. Various studies in the last decade of this belief have challenged the need for sniffing position during intubation. We conducted a prospective study comparing the sniffing head position with simple head extension to study the laryngoscopic view and intubation difficulty during direct laryngoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five-hundred patients were included in this study and randomly distributed to SP or simple head extension. In the sniffing group, an incompressible head ring was placed under the head to raise its height by 7 cm from the neutral plane followed by maximal extension of the head. In the simple extension group, no headrest was placed under the head; however, maximal head extension was given at the time of laryngoscopy. Various factors as ability to mask ventilate, laryngoscopic visualization, intubation difficulty, and posture of the anesthesiologist during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were noted. In the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack Grade III and IV), Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS score) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between two groups in Cormack grades. The IDS score differed significantly between sniffing group and simple extension group (P = 0.000) with an increased difficulty during intubation in the simple head extension. Patients with simple head extension needed more lifting force, increased use of external laryngeal manipulation, and an increased use of alternate techniques during intubation when compared to SP. CONCLUSION: We conclude that compared to the simple head extension position, the SP should be used as a standard head position for intubation attempts under general anesthesia.

Age and gender are important considerations in choosing the sniffing position for laryngoscopic view.

AIMS: The sniffing position is considered to be the standard position for direct laryngoscopic viewing. This crossover study evaluated age and gender as variables in comparing the benefits of the sniffing position over simple head extension for laryngeal view during direct laryngoscopy. METHODS: Laryngoscopy with a curved blade was performed on 200 anesthetized adults (100 males, 100 females) presenting for routine elective surgery. Glottic visualization was assessed by using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score in both simple extension and sniffing positions without the aid of the assistant or external laryngeal manipulation. Each gender group was divided into a younger group (< 50 years) and an older group (≥ 50 years). POGO scores were compared between both positions within each group. RESULTS: Mean (SD) POGO scores increased significantly only in younger male patients from 43% (39%) in the head extension position to 76% (30%) in the sniffing position. CONCLUSION: The sniffing position seems to be advantageous for getting a better laryngeal view during laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in adult male patients less than 50 years old.

Sniffing Position Improves the Laryngeal View Regardless of Body Mass Index / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Most anesthesiologists universally recommend the sniffing position and consider it to be essential for improving the performance of orotracheal intubation. However, a recent investigation reported that the sniffing position does not aid the laryngoscope except under specific circumstances (i.e., obesity). Therefore, this study examined the impact of the BMI (body mass index) on the effectiveness of the sniffing position in improving the laryngeal view. METHODS: A video laryngoscopy imaging system and POGO (the percentage of glottic opening) scoring system were used to assess the laryngeal view in 79 adult patients undergoing a laryngoscopy. In each patient, the laryngeal view was videotaped continuously from simple head extension to the sniffing position by inflating a pressure bag as a pillow to obtain approximately 15o of flexion of the lower cervical spine on the chest. The variables assessed included the BMI, the POGO score in each position and the change in the POGO score. RESULTS: The POGO scores improved with the sniffing position (18.1 +/- 14.3%). However, the sniffing position did not improve the POGO score in 16/79 (20.3%) patients. The sniffing position did not worsen the POGO score in any patient. No significant correlation was found between the BMI and the change in the POGO score in the sniffing position (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: The sniffing position has the potential to improve the laryngeal view in all intubations without needing to consider the BMI. Therefore, the sniffing position appears to be advantageous for orotracheal intubation compared with a simple head extension.