Unlocking the Potential of Secondary Data for Public Health Research: Retrospective Study With a Novel Clinical Platform.

BACKGROUND: Clinical routine data derived from university hospitals hold immense value for health-related research on large cohorts. However, using secondary data for hypothesis testing necessitates adherence to scientific, legal (such as the General Data Protection Regulation, federal and state protection legislations), technical, and administrative requirements. This process is intricate, time-consuming, and susceptible to errors. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a platform that enables clinicians to use current real-world data for testing research and evaluate advantages and limitations at a large university medical center (542,944 patients in 2022). METHODS: We identified requirements from clinical practitioners, conceptualized and implemented a platform based on the existing components, and assessed its applicability in clinical reality quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: The proposed platform was established at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and made 639 forms encompassing 10,629 data elements accessible to all resident scientists and clinicians. Every day, the number of patients rises, and parts of their electronic health records are made accessible through the platform. Qualitatively, we were able to conduct a retrospective analysis of Parkinson disease over 777 patients, where we provide additional evidence for a significantly higher proportion of action tremors in patients with rest tremors (340/777, 43.8%) compared with those without rest tremors (255/777, 32.8%), as determined by a chi-square test (P<.001). Quantitatively, our findings demonstrate increased user engagement within the last 90 days, underscoring clinicians' increasing adoption of the platform in their regular research activities. Notably, the platform facilitated the retrieval of clinical data from 600,000 patients, emphasizing its substantial added value. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of simplifying the use of clinical data to enhance exploration and sustainability in scientific research. The proposed platform emerges as a potential technological and legal framework for other medical centers, providing them with the means to unlock untapped potential within their routine data.

Ethical Governance of Human Health Related Research / 中国医学伦理学

The frequent several ethical events in recent years suggested carry out the construction of ethical governance system involving human health-related research under the background of national governance. The subjects of ethical governance include the government, medical institutions, universities, scientific research institutes, enterprise, ethics committees, researchers, the public, etc., the multiple subjects are interrelated and interact with each other to restrict and standardize ethics through different governance tools. However, there are some problems in China’s ethical governance, such as the relative lag in the construction of ethical governance concept and system, insufficient multi-party participation, the difficulty in sole legislation to solve risk and ethical problems, the specification cannot be met, inadequate supervision, insufficient accountability for violations, researchers lack ethical awareness, ethical education lags behind and insufficient information disclosure to the public. It should be taken such as countermeasures as paying attention to the theoretical research of ethical governance system, strengthening the construction of ethical governance system, pluralistic co governance, agile governance, strengthening legislation, improving norms, implementing supervision, strengthening the construction of ethics committee, talent training, training researchers, ethical education, popular science public, academic self-discipline, information disclosure and public participation, so as to build a scientific and technological ethics governance system in line with China’s national conditions and in line with international standards, and contribute China’s wisdom for world ethical governance.

Acreditación de los comités de ética en investigación en el Paraguay: un imperativo ético / Acreditació dels comitès d'ètica en investigació al Paraguai: un imperatiu ètic / Accreditation of research ethics committees in Paraguay: An ethical imperative

En la última década, el Paraguay ha presentado avances en el desarrollo de la investigación relacionada con la salud con seres humanos.Sin embargo, existe una obligación estatal de asegurar que las investigaciones sean realizadas éticamente: protegiendo la dignidad, los derechos y el bienestar de los participantes, la integridad científica y la adherencia a pautas éticas locales e internacionales. Los comités de ética de la investigación institucionales constituyen la instancia o recurso principal para garantizar la mencionada obligación. Ante lo expuesto y el contexto carente de adecuada regulación en el cual actualmente se desarrollan las investigaciones en el país, en el presente artículo defenderemos el imperativo ético de establecer un sistema de acreditación de los comités de ética de la investigación. Para ello, expondremos y justificaremos su necesidad y buscaremos responder algunas objeciones relativas al imperativo ético defendido, como, por ejemplo, el valor per se de la acreditación de los comités de ética en investigación en la protección de los participantes, la inversión de tiempo y burocracia que implican los procesos de acreditación y el marco regulatorio incipiente para las investigaciones en seres humanos en el Paraguay. Finalmente, propondremos el fortalecimiento de la gobernanza de la ética de la investigación en el país, como medio principal para establecer, implementar y supervisar un sistema de acreditación de los comités de ética de la investigación.(AU)

A l'última dècada, el Paraguai ha presentat avençosen el desenvolupament de la recerca relacionada amb la salut amb éssers humans. Tot i això, hi ha una obligació estatal d'assegurar que les investigacions siguin realitzades èticament: protegint la dignitat, els drets i el benestar dels participants, la integritat científica i l'adherència a pautes ètiques locals i internacionals. Els comitès d'ètica de la investigació institucionals constitueixen la instància o el recurs principal per garantir l'obligació esmentada. Davant del que s'ha exposat i el context sense regulació adequada en el qual actualment es desenvolupen les investigacions al país, en aquest article defensarem l'imperatiu ètic d'establir un sistema d'acreditació dels comitès d'ètica de la investigació. Per això, exposarem i justificarem la seva necessitat i buscarem respondre algunes objeccions relatives a l'imperatiu ètic defensat, com, per exemple, el valor perseguit de l'acreditació dels comitès d'ètica en recerca en la protecció dels participants, la inversió de temps i burocràcia que impliquen els processos d'acreditació i el marc regulador incipient per a les investigacions en éssers humans al Paraguai. Finalment, proposarem l'enfortiment de la governança de l'ètica de la investigació al país com a mitjà principal per establir, implementar i supervisar un sistema d'acreditació dels comitès d'ètica de la investigació.(AU)

In the last decade, Paraguay has made progress in the development of health-related research involving human subjects. This entails the obligation of the State to ensure that research is conducted ethically: protecting the dignity, rights and welfare of the participants, scientific integrity and adherence to international ethical guidelines. Research Ethics Committees are the main instance or resource to guarantee the aforementioned obligation. In view of the above and the context lacking adequate regulation in which research is currently carried out in the country, this article will defend the ethical imperative of establishing an accreditation system for research ethics committees. To this end, its necessity will be presented and justified and some objections related to the ethical imperative defended will be answered, such as the per se value of the accreditation of research ethics committees in the protection of participants, the investment of time and bureaucracy involved in the accreditation processes and the incipient regulatory framework for research on human beings in Paraguay. Finally, it will be proposed to strengthen the governance of research ethics in the country, as the main means to establish, implement and supervise an accreditation system for research ethics committees.(AU)

Women Participation in Health Research of Iran: Analysis of Challenges and Strategies with Literature of Review.

Background: Recent evidence provides the facts behind the perceptions about women researchers participating in health research (HR). Women scientists as almost half of active researchers in HR fields have important and fundamental role. The present study aimed to analyses the situation of women participation in HR of Iran. Methods: The present study comprised three complementary phases intended to identify and analysis challenges and problems of women participation in health research in Iran (2021-22). Following a review phase, using the content analysis approach through semi-structured interviews data gathered from key stakeholders of health research. At final step, aimed to aggregate and conclude the main key findings, through an expert panel all of the results analyzed to clarify the main messages of the study, focus on reflection to the target group. Results: The results reveal considerable gender differences in research contribution between Iranian men and women. The need for legal infrastructure and support for the active participation of women in HR was the main extracted point of study. The need for transparent documentation and implementation of related research that demonstrates the necessary challenges and gaps was another major point. Conclusion: Findings may help illuminate policy makings to promote participation of women in the country research. The optimal management of HR require facilities can play an important role in improving the quality and quantity of health studies and achieving scientific competitive positions at the regional and global levels.

Accreditation of research ethics committees in Paraguay: An ethical imperative.

In the last decade, Paraguay has made progress in the development of health-related research involving human subjects. This entails the obligation of the State to ensure that research is conducted ethically: protecting the dignity, rights and welfare of the participants, scientific integrity and adherence to international ethical guidelines. Research Ethics Committees are the main instance or resource to guarantee the aforementioned obligation. In view of the above and the context lacking adequate regulation in which research is currently carried out in the country, this article will defend the ethical imperative of establishing an accreditation system for research ethics committees. To this end, its necessity will be presented and justified and some objections related to the ethical imperative defended will be answered, such as the per se value of the accreditation of research ethics committees in the protection of participants, the investment of time and bureaucracy involved in the accreditation processes and the incipient regulatory framework for research on human beings in Paraguay. Finally, it will be proposed to strengthen the governance of research ethics in the country, as the main means to establish, implement and supervise an accreditation system for research ethics committees.

Resumen: En la última década, el Paraguay ha presentado avances en el desarrollo de la investigación relacionada con la salud con seres humanos. Sin embargo, existe una obligación estatal de asegurar que las investigaciones sean realizadas éticamente: protegiendo la dignidad, los derechos y el bienestar de los participantes, la integridad científica y la adherencia a pautas éticas locales e internacionales. Los comités de ética de la investigación institucionales constituyen la instancia o recurso principal para garantizar la mencionada obligación. Ante lo expuesto y el contexto carente de adecuada regulación en el cual actualmente se desarrollan las investigaciones en el país, en el presente artículo defenderemos el imperativo ético de establecer un sistema de acreditación de los comités de ética de la investigación. Para ello, expondremos y justificaremos su necesidad y buscaremos responder algunas objeciones relativas al imperativo ético defendido, como, por ejemplo, el valor per se de la acreditación de los comités de ética en investigación en la protección de los participantes, la inversión de tiempo y burocracia que implican los procesos de acreditación y el marco regulatorio incipiente para las investigaciones en seres humanos en el Paraguay. Finalmente, propondremos el fortalecimiento de la gobernanza de la ética de la investigación en el país, como medio principal para establecer, implementar y supervisar un sistema de acreditación de los comités de ética de la investigación. Palabras clave: comité de ética en investigación; acreditación de los comités de ética de la investigación; investigación relacionada con la salud con seres humanos; protección de los sujetos de estudio en las investigaciones; pautas éticas internacionales; gobernanza de la ética de la investigación. Resum: A l'última dècada, el Paraguai ha presentat avenços en el desenvolupament de la recerca relacionada amb la salut amb éssers humans. Tot i això, hi ha una obligació estatal d'assegurar que les investigacions siguin realitzades èticament: protegint la dignitat, els drets i el benestar dels participants, la integritat científica i l'adherència a pautes ètiques locals i internacionals. Els comitès d'ètica de la investigació institucionals constitueixen la instància o el recurs principal per garantir l'obligació esmentada. Davant del que s'ha exposat i el context sense regulació adequada en el qual actualment es desenvolupen les investigacions al país, en aquest article defensarem l'imperatiu ètic d'establir un sistema d'acreditació dels comitès d'ètica de la investigació. Per això, exposarem i justificarem la seva necessitat i buscarem respondre algunes objeccions relatives a l'imperatiu ètic defensat, com, per exemple, el valor perseguit de l'acreditació dels comitès d'ètica en recerca en la protecció dels participants, la inversió de temps i burocràcia que impliquen els processos d'acreditació i el marc regulador incipient per a les investigacions en éssers humans al Paraguai. Finalment, proposarem l'enfortiment de la governança de l'ètica de la investigació al país com a mitjà principal per establir, implementar i supervisar un sistema d'acreditació dels comitès d'ètica de la investigació. Paraules clau: comitè d'ètica en investigació; acreditació dels comitès d'ètica de la investigació; investigació relacionada amb la salut amb éssers humans; protecció dels subjectes d'estudi a les investigacions; pautes ètiques internacionals; governança de l'ètica de la investigació.

Developing and testing guidance to support researchers engaging patient partners in health-related research.

BACKGROUND: Although interest in Patient and Public Involvement in health-related research is growing, there seems to be a lack of guidance supporting researchers in deciding on methods and levels for Patient and Public Involvement in health-related research throughout the research process. Furthermore, the numerous definitions, methods, and frameworks make it challenging for researchers new to this field to decide on the most appropriate approach for their project. METHODS: This study aimed to develop and test guidance for researchers deciding on approaches, levels, and methods for engaging patient partners in health-related research. A group of 11 researchers in Patient and Public Involvement in health-related research participated in six workshops to develop the guidance. The feasibility and acceptability of the guidance were tested in a survey of 14 researchers using the System Usability Scale plus two elaborative questions. The guidance was also tested by five PhD students engaging patient partners in their projects. RESULTS: The guidance developed consisted of two resources: Resource I outlined five international approaches to Patient and Public Involvement in health-related research, and Resource II described the different levels and methods for engaging patient partners in research. The System Usability Scale score (at the 50th percentile) was 80, indicating excellent usability. Qualitative data showed that the two resources supported reflections regarding different approaches, levels, and methods. CONCLUSION: The researchers found the guidance to be supportive of their reflective thinking about engaging patient partners in their research. The testing provided knowledge about when and how to use the guidance but also raised questions about the usefulness of the guidance in communications with patients.

More and more patients are taking part in research as patient partners. However, researchers have little guidance on how to bring patient partners into research studies and at what levels. There are many ways to do this. It can be hard to choose the way most appropriate for a specific project, especially for newer researchers. We (11 researchers at different career levels) developed guidance through six workshops to help new researchers choosing the way to engage patient partners most appropriate for their project. The guidance resulted in two different resources. Resource I gives five international approaches for bringing patient partners into research. Resource II describes methods for engaging patient partners at different levels. Fourteen researchers and five PhD students tested the guidance and scored how usable it is. It had excellent usability. The two resources did help researchers to decide on the best ways to engage patient partners in research. We now need to test how the guidance can be used to talk to patients about taking part in specific research projects.

A chronological discourse analysis of ancillary care provision in guidance documents for research conduct in the global south.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous guidelines and policies for ethical research practice have evolved over time, how this translates to global health practice in resource-constrained settings is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to describe how the concept of ancillary care has evolved over time and how it is included in the ethics guidelines and policy documents that guide the conduct of research in the global south with both an international focus and providing a specific example of Malawi, where the first author lives and works, as a case study. METHODS: Discourse analysis was conducted on 34 international ethics guidelines and policy documents. Documents were purposively selected if they contained a set of key terms that reflect the concept of ancillary care. Following a process of inductive discourse analysis, five key interrelated text phrases relating to ancillary care were extracted from the documents. The evolution of these phrases over time was explored as they represented the development of the concept of ancillary care as a component of ethical health research guidance and practice. RESULTS: We found key interrelated phrases that represent discourses regarding the evolution of ancillary care including participant protection; provide care as appropriate; supererogation; patient needs prevail over science; and ancillary care as an obligation. Arguments for the provision of ancillary care were characterised by safeguarding the safety, health rights and well-being of study participants. However, despite the evolution of discourse around ethical obligations to provide ancillary care, this is rarely made explicit within guidance documents, leaving interpretive space for differential application in practice. CONCLUSION: While there have been major changes to the ethics guidance that reflect significant evolution in the ethical conduct of research, the specific vocabulary or language used to explain the ethics of researchers' ancillary care obligations to the health needs of their research participants, lacks clarity and consistency. As a result, the concept of ancillary care continues to be under-represented in local ethical guidelines and regulations, with no clear directives for country-level research ethics committees to apply in regulating ancillary care responsibilities.

Ethical Governance of Human Health Related Research / 中国医学伦理学

The frequent several ethical events in recent years suggested carry out the construction of ethical governance system involving human health-related research under the background of national governance. The subjects of ethical governance include the government, medical institutions, universities, scientific research institutes, enterprise, ethics committees, researchers, the public, etc., the multiple subjects are interrelated and interact with each other to restrict and standardize ethics through different governance tools. However, there are some problems in China’s ethical governance, such as the relative lag in the construction of ethical governance concept and system, insufficient multi-party participation, the difficulty in sole legislation to solve risk and ethical problems, the specification cannot be met, inadequate supervision, insufficient accountability for violations, researchers lack ethical awareness, ethical education lags behind and insufficient information disclosure to the public. It should be taken such as countermeasures as paying attention to the theoretical research of ethical governance system, strengthening the construction of ethical governance system, pluralistic co governance, agile governance, strengthening legislation, improving norms, implementing supervision, strengthening the construction of ethics committee, talent training, training researchers, ethical education, popular science public, academic self-discipline, information disclosure and public participation, so as to build a scientific and technological ethics governance system in line with China’s national conditions and in line with international standards, and contribute China’s wisdom for world ethical governance.

Intersection of Health Informatics Tools and Community Engagement in Health-Related Research to Reduce Health Inequities: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: The exponential growth of health information technology has the potential to facilitate community engagement in research. However, little is known about the use of health information technology in community-engaged research, such as which types of health information technology are used, which populations are engaged, and what are the research outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this scoping review were to examine studies that used health information technology for community engagement and to assess (1) the types of populations, (2) community engagement strategies, (3) types of health information technology tools, and (4) outcomes of interest. METHODS: We searched PubMed and PCORI Literature Explorer using terms related to health information technology, health informatics, community engagement, and stakeholder involvement. This search process yielded 967 papers for screening. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, a total of 37 papers were analyzed for key themes and for approaches relevant to health information technology and community engagement research. RESULTS: This analysis revealed that the communities engaged were generally underrepresented populations in health-related research, including racial or ethnic minority communities such as Black/African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Latino ethnicity, and communities from low socioeconomic backgrounds. The studies focused on various age groups, ranging from preschoolers to older adults. The studies were also geographically spread across the United States and the world. Community engagement strategies included collaborative development of health information technology tools and partnerships to promote use (encompassing collaborative development, use of community advisory boards, and focus groups for eliciting information needs) and use of health information technology to engage communities in research (eg, through citizen science). The types of technology varied across studies, with mobile or tablet-based apps being the most common platform. Outcomes measured included eliciting user needs and requirements, assessing health information technology tools and prototypes with participants, measuring knowledge, and advocating for community change. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the current landscape at the intersection of health information technology tools and community-engaged research approaches. It highlights studies in which various community-engaged research approaches were used to design culturally centered health information technology tools, to promote health information technology uptake, or for engagement in health research and advocacy. Our findings can serve as a platform for generating future research upon which to expand the scope of health information technology tools and their use for meaningful stakeholder engagement. Studies that incorporate community context and needs have a greater chance of cocreating culturally centered health information technology tools and better knowledge to promote action and improve health outcomes.

Nature and history of the CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines and implications for local implementation: A perspective from East Africa.

The theme of the 10th Annual Research Ethics Conference organized by the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (2018) was "Evolution of Research Ethics in Uganda and the Region: Past, Present and Future". We were asked to address the topic: "The History of CIOMS and the recent changes in the international ethics guidelines: implications for local research". The thrust of the conference was to track progress in ensuring ethical conduct of research, highlight challenges encountered, and to propose strategies for effective and meaningful implementation of international ethical guidelines in local contexts. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to comment on the implications of the history of CIOMS ethical guidelines and suggest strategies for their effective and meaningful implementation in the East African region, and perhaps the whole of Sub-Saharan Africa. Inferring from the 'evolutionary', 'flexible', and 'general' nature of the CIOMS guidelines, we proposed a six-point strategy for ensuring their effective and meaningful implementation in local contexts. This strategy is in the form of obligations for local research regulators and researchers, the fulfillment of which will go a long way towards their smooth and meaningful implementation in local contexts. These obligations are: ensuring evidence-based adaptation of each individual guideline; ensuring sufficiently judicious and motivated RECs membership; acting proactively to ensure harmony between bioethics and local legal regimes; cultivating a 'bioethics culture' among the public; moving towards regional bioethics governance; and playing an active and meaningful role in future revisions of these guidelines.

Patient participation in research funding: an overview of when, why and how amongst Dutch health funds.

BACKGROUND: Patient participation in decision-making on health-related research has gained ground. Nineteen Dutch health-related research-funding organisations (HFs) have taken up the challenge to include patients in their funding process. A 'Patient participation (PP) advisory team' was set-up, with HF-representatives and patient advocates, who together initiated this study. We provide an overview of when, why, and how PP activities take place in HFs' funding processes, share main challenges and identify possible solutions. METHODS: A qualitative research design was used. Data was gathered by questionnaires (n = 14) and semi-structured interviews (n = 18) with HF employees responsible for patient participation, followed by a workshop (n = 27) with involved employees of HFs and key players in PP from national patient organisations and research organisations. A descriptive analysis was used for the questionnaire. A semi-directed content analysis was used for the interviews and the workshop. RESULTS: Three stages can be identified in the funding process in which HFs carry out PP activities: (1) strategic decision-making about focus of research (e.g. shared research agendas); (2) call for and receipt of research proposals (e.g. mandatory inclusion of letter of recommendation from patient organisation); (3) decision-making about the funding of research proposals (e.g. patients reside in a patient panel to co-review research proposals). Main challenges identified to carry out PP activities include: how to accommodate diversity of the patient body (mainly encountered in stage 1 and 3); to what extent should patients receive training to successfully participate (mainly encountered in stage 1 and 3); and who is responsible for patient-researcher dialogues (mainly encountered in stage 1 and 2). All nineteen HFs agree that patients should be included in at least one stage of the funding process for health-related research. CONCLUSION: Further broadening and optimising patient involvement is still needed. The proposed solutions to the identified challenges could serve as inspiration for national and international research funding foundations that aim to structurally include patients in their funding process.

Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent: conceptual tools.

BACKGROUND: Despite existing international, regional and national guidance on how to obtain valid consent to health-related research, valid consent remains both a practical and normative challenge. This challenge persists despite additional evidence-based guidance obtained through conceptual and empirical research in specific localities on the same subject. The purpose of this paper is to provide an account for why, despite this guidance, this challenge still persist and suggest conceptual resources that can help make sense of this problem and eventually mitigate it'. MAIN BODY: This paper argues that despite the existence of detailed official guidance and prior conceptual and empirical research on how to obtain valid consent, the question of 'how to obtain and ascertain valid consent to participation in health-related research' cannot always be fully answered by exclusive reference to pre-determined criteria/guidance provided by the guidelines and prior research'. To make intelligible why this is so and how this challenge could be allayed, the paper proposes six concepts. The first five of these are intended to account for the persistent seeming inadequacies of existing guidelines. These are fact-skepticism; guideline insufficiency; generality; context-neutrality and presumptiveness. As an outcome of these five, the paper analyzes and recommends a sixth, called bioethical reflexivity. Bioethical reflexivity is reckoned as a handy tool, skill, and attitude by which, in addition to guidance from context-specific research, the persisting challenges can be further eased. CONCLUSIONS: Existing ethical guidelines on how to obtain valid consent to health-related research are what they ought to be - general, presumptive and context-neutral. This explains their seeming inadequacies whenever they are being applied in concrete situations. Hence, the challenges being encountered while obtaining valid consent can be significantly eased if we appreciate the guidelines' nature and what this means for their implementation. There is also a need to cultivate reflexive mindsets plus the relevant skills needed to judiciously close the unavoidable gaps between guidelines and their application in concrete cases. This equally applies to the gaps which cannot be filled by reference to additional guidance from prior conceptual and empirical research in specific contexts.