The Influence of Radiographic Parameter on the S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Virtual Trajectory in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients: A Computed Tomography Study.

OBJECTIVE: S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw had been widely used in the pelvic fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients. However, whether S2AI screw trajectory was influenced by sagittal profile in DLS patients had not been comprehensively investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the associations between the optimal S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw trajectory and sagittal spinopelvic parameters in DLS patients. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of pelvis were performed in 47 DLS patients for three-dimensional reconstruction of S2AI screw trajectory from September 2019 to November 2021. Five S2AI screw trajectory parameters were measured in CT reconstruction images, including: 1) angle in the transverse plane (Tsv angle); 2) angle in the sagittal plane (Sag angle); 3) maximal screw length; 4) screw width; and 5) skin distance. The lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar apical vertebral translation (AVT); global kyphosis (GK); thoracic kyphosis (TK); lumbar lordosis (LL); sagittal vertical axis (SVA); sacral slope (SS); pelvic tilt (PT); and pelvic incidence (PI) were measured in standing X-ray films of the whole spine and pelvis. RESULTS: Both Tsv angle and Sag angle had significant positive associations with SS (p < 0.05) but negative associations with both PT (p < 0.05) and LL (p < 0.05) in all cases. Patients with SS less than 15° had both smaller Tsv angle and Sag angle than those with SS equal to or more than 15° (p < 0.05). The decreased LL would lead to the backward rotation of the pelvis, resulting in a more cephalic and less divergent trajectory of S2AI screw in DLS patients. CONCLUSIONS: For DLS patients with lumbar kyphosis, spine surgeons should avoid both excessive Tsv and Sag angles for S2AI screw insertion, especially when using free-hand technique.

S2 alar-iliac screws are superior to traditional iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Spinopelvic fixation (SPF) using traditional iliac screws has provided biomechanical advantages compared to previous constructs, but common complications include screw prominence and wound complications. The newer S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw may provide a lower profile option with lower rates of complications and revisions for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The purpose of this study was to compare rates of complications and revision following SPF between S2AI and traditional iliac screws in patients with ASD. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review was conducted using Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed. Included studies reported primary data on adult patients undergoing S2AI screw fixation or traditional IS fixation for ASD. Primary outcomes of interest were rates of revision and complications, which included screw failure (fracture and loosening), symptomatic screw prominence, wound complications (dehiscence and infection), and L5-S1 pseudarthrosis. RESULTS: Fifteen retrospective studies with a total of 1502 patients (iliac screws: 889 [59.2%]; S2AI screws: 613 [40.8%]) were included. Pooled analysis indicated that iliac screws had significantly higher odds of revision (17.1% vs 9.1%, OR = 2.45 [1.25-4.77]), symptomatic screw prominence (9.9% vs 2.2%, OR = 6.26 [2.75-14.27]), and wound complications (20.1% vs 4.4%, OR = 5.94 [1.55-22.79]). S2AI screws also led to a larger preoperative to postoperative decrease in pain (SMD = - 0.26, 95% CI = -0.50, - 0.011). CONCLUSION: The findings from this review demonstrate higher rates of revision, symptomatic screw prominence, and wound complications with traditional iliac screws. Current data supports the use of S2AI screws specifically for ASD. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022336515. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A New Approach to the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain and First Patient-Reported Outcomes Using a Novel Arthrodesis Technique for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Purpose: To report the development of a new sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthrodesis system that can be used for isolated fusion of the SIJ and, unlike known implant systems, in combination with lumbar instrumentation or as an alternative to existing sacropelvic fixation (SPF) methods, and the patient-reported outcomes in two cases. Materials and Methods: After a comprehensive review of 207 pelvic computed tomography (CT) datasets, an implant body was designed. Its shape was modeled based on the SIJ recess. A screw anchored in the ilium secures the position of the implant and allows connection to lumbar instrumentation. Two patients with confirmed SIJ syndrome underwent surgery with the anatomically adapted implant. They were evaluated preoperatively, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Million Visual Analogue Scale (MVAS), Roland Morris Score (RMS), reduction of SIJ/leg pain, and work status were assessed. Bony fusion of the SIJ was evaluated by radiographs and CT 12 months after the procedure. Results: Analysis of pelvic CT data revealed a wedge-shaped implant body in four different sizes. In the two patients, VAS decreased from 88 to 33 points, ODI improved from 67 to 35%, MVAS decreased from 80 to 36%, and RMS decreased from 18 to 9 points 12 months after surgery. SIJ pain reduction was 80% and 90%, respectively. Follow-up CT and radiographs showed solid bony integration. Conclusion: The implant used takes into account the unique anatomy of the SIJ and also meets the requirements of a true arthrodesis. Initial results in two patients are promising. Biomechanical and clinical studies will have to show whether the considerable theoretical advantages of the new implant system over existing SIJ implants - in particular the possibility of connection to a lumbar stabilization system - and SPFs can be put into practice.

Incidence and Risk Factors of the Caudal Screw Loosening after Pelvic Fixation for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to assess the factors affecting caudal screw loosening after spinopelvic fixation for adult patients with spinal deformity. This meta-analysis calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using Review Manager ver. 5.3 (RevMan; Cochrane, London, UK). The loosening group was older than the control group (WMD, 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-3.87; p=0.01). The S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) could prevent the caudal screw from loosening (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94; p=0.03). However, gender distribution (p=0.36), the number of fusion segments (p=0.24), rod breakage (p=0.97), T-score (p=0.10), and proximal junctional kyphosis (p=0.75) demonstrated no difference. Preoperatively, only pelvic incidence (PI) in the loosening group was higher (WMD, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.71-7.45; p<0.01), while thoracic kyphosis (p=0.09), lumbar lordosis (LL) (p=0.69), pelvic tilt (PT) (p=0.31), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) (p=0.35), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p=0.27), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) demonstrated no difference (p=0.10). PI-LL (WMD, 6.05; 95% CI, 0.96-11.14; p=0.02), PT (WMD, 4.12; 95% CI, 0.99-7.26; p=0.01), TPA (WMD, 4.72; 95% CI, 2.35-7.09; p<0.01), and SVA (WMD, 13.35; 95% CI, 2.83-3.87; p=0.001) were higher in the screw loosening group immediately postoperatively. However, TK (p=0.24) and LL (p=0.44) demonstrated no difference. TPA (WMD, 8.38; 95% CI, 3.30-13.47; p<0.01), PT (WMD, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.47-10.55; p=0.01), and SVA (WMD, 23.13; 95% CI, 12.06-34.21; p<0.01) were higher in the screw loosening group at the final follow-up. However, PI-LL (p=0.17) demonstrated no significant difference. Elderly individuals were more susceptible to the caudal screw loosening, and the S2AI screw might better reduce the caudal screw loosening rate than the iliac screws. The lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment should be reconstructed properly to prevent the caudal screw from loosening. Measures to block sagittal alignment deterioration could also prevent the caudal screw from loosening.

Comparison of the operation safety and biomechanical stability of sacral alar-iliac vs. sacroiliac screws in the fixation of sacroiliac joint in simulated models of low bone density.

BACKGROUND: Sacral alar-iliac screws (SAISs) have been used for sacroiliac joint and are superiority to traditional sacroiliac screws (SISs) in patients with low bone density. The aim of this study was to investigate the operation safety and biomechanical stability of the SIS, transsacral-transiliac screw (TSTIS), S1AIS and S2AIS in the treatment of sacroiliac joint in simulated models of low bone density. METHODS: CT data from 80 normal pelvic structures were employed to measure the anatomical parameters, including the safety zones of the S1AIS and S2AIS at the insertion point and the trajectory lengths of the SIS, TSTIS, S1AIS and S2AIS. Sixteen synthetic pelvises with simulated osteoporotic bone structure were used to simulate type C Tile lesions and divided into 4 groups with an anterior plate and posterior fixation using one of the following: 1) one SIS on each side, 2) one TSTIS fixing both sides, 3) one S1AIS on each side, or 4) one S2AIS on each side. The stiffness and maximum load of the specimens were analyzed using a biomechanical machine under vertical loading. RESULTS: The safety zone of S1AIS was larger than that of S2AIS (p < 0.05). The TSTIS had the largest trajectory length, followed by the S1AIS and S2AIS, and the SIS had the smallest trajectory length (p < 0.05). However, the lengths of the TSTIS (26.1 ± 1.7 mm) and SIS (27.8 ± 1.8 mm) trajectories on the short side (the iliac side) were smaller than those of S1AIS (40.4 ± 3.8 mm) and S2AIS (39.1 ± 3.8 mm), thus indicating significant differences (p < 0.05). The stiffness and maximum load of S1AIS and S2AIS were similar and the greatest, followed by TSTIS and SIS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The stability of S1AIS and S2AIS is similar, both stronger than that of SIS and TSTIS, which have shorter lengths of the screw trajectories on the ilium side. However, the safety zone of S2AIS at the insertion point is smaller than that of S1AIS. Therefore, considering both safety and stability, S1AIS is the preferred choice for fixation of sacroiliac joint dislocation in simulated models of low bone density.

[Feasibility analysis and nail planning ofS2 iliac crest screw placement in children].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of S2 alar iliac screw insertion in Chinese children using computerized three-dimension reconstruction and simulated screw placement technique, and to optimize the measurement of screw parameters. METHODS: A total of 83 pelvic CT data of children who underwent pelvic CT scan December 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, excluding fractures, deformities, and tumors. There were 44 boys and 39 girls, with an average age of (10.66±3.52) years, and were divided into 4 groups based on age (group A:5 to 7 years old;group B:8 to 10 years old;group C:11-13 years old;group D:14 to 16 years old). The original CT data obtained were imported into Mimics software, and the bony structure of the pelvis was reconstructed, and the maximum and minimum cranial angles of the screws were simulated in the three-dimensional view with the placement of 6.5 mm diameter S2 alar iliac screws. Subsequently, the coronal angle, sagittal angle, transverse angle, total length of the screw, length of the screw in the sacrum, width of the iliac, and distance of the entry point from the skin were measured in 3-Matic software at the maximum and minimum head tilt angles, respectively. The differences among the screw parameters of S2 alar iliac screws in children of different ages and the differences between gender and side were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: In all 83 children, 6.5 mm diameter S2 iliac screws could be placed. There was no significant difference between the side of each screw placement parameter. The 5 to 7 years old children had a significantly smaller screw coronal angle than other age groups, but in the screw sagittal angle, the difference was more mixed. The 5 to 7 years old children could obtain a larger angle at the maximum head tilt angle of the screw, but at the minimum cranial angle, the larger angle was obtained in the age group of 11 to 13 years old. There were no significant differences among the age groups. The coronal angle and sagittal angle under maximum cephalic angle and minimum cranial angle of 5 to 7 years old male were (40.91±2.91)° and (51.85±3.75)° respectively, which were significantly greater than in female. The coronal angle under minimum cranial angle was significantly greater in girls aged 8-10 years old than in boys. For the remaining screw placement angle parameters, there were no significant differences between gender. The differences in the minimum iliac width, the screw length, and the length of the sacral screws showed an increasing trend with age in all age groups. The distance from the screw entry point to the skin in boys were significantly smaller than that of girls. The minimum width of the iliac in boys at 14 to 16 years of age were significantly wider than that in girls at the same stage. In contrast, in girls aged 5 to 7 years and 11 to 13 years, the screw length was significantly longer than that of boys at the same stage. CONCLUSION: The pelvis of children aged 5 to 16 years can safely accommodate the placement of 6.5 mm diameter S2 alar iliac screws, but the bony structures of the pelvis are developing and growing in children, precise assessment is needed to plan a reasonable screw trajectory and select the appropriate screw length.

A radiological analysis of pelvic fixation trajectories: patient series.

BACKGROUND: Three well-defined methods for pelvic fixation are used for biomechanical support in spine fusion constructs: iliac, recessed iliac, and S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws. The authors compared the maximum screw sizes that could be placed with these techniques by using image-guidance software and high-resolution computed tomography scans from 20 randomly selected patients. Six trajectories were plotted per side, beginning at recognized starting points (standard or recessed posterior superior iliac spine [PSIS] or S2AI screw) and ending at the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) or supra-acetabular notch (SAN). OBSERVATIONS: The mean maximum screw length and width ranged from 80.0 ± 32.2 mm to 140.8 ± 22.6 mm and from 8.25 ± 1.2 mm to 13.0 ± 2.7 mm, respectively, depending on the trajectory. Statistically significant differences in length were found between the standard and recessed PSIS trajectories to the AIIS (p < 0.001) and between the standard PSIS-to-AIIS trajectory and the S2AI-to-AIIS (p = 0.007) or S2AI-to-SAN (p < 0.001) trajectories. The most successful trajectory was the PSIS to SAN (95%, 38/40). LESSONS: The traditional iliac screw trajectory enabled the longest and widest screw trajectories and highest rate of successful screw placement with the fewest theoretical breaches more reliably than recessed and S2AI trajectories. These findings may help surgeons plan for maximum screw purchase for pelvic fixation.

Clinicoradiological Outcomes and Complication Profiles of Bilateral Dual Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screws versus Bilateral Single Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screws in Patients with Spinal Deformity Who Underwent Grade 3 or 4 Spinal Osteotomies: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term clinical and radiological outcomes and complication profiles between bilateral dual sacral-2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and bilateral single S2AI screw fixation techniques in patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 spinal osteotomies. METHODS: A retrospective review of 83 patients treated with bilateral dual S2AI screws and 32 patients treated with bilateral single S2AI screws was conducted between 2018 and 2020 with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes of patients and incidence of perioperative complications, including rod breakage, screw dislodgment, proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, need for reoperation, and systemic adverse effects, were collected and statistically compared between the groups. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 18.2 months, rod fracture (6.0% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.03), screw dislodgment (0 vs. 12.5%, P < 0.01), and S2AI screw loosening (1.2% vs. 18.7%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the dual S2AI screws group than in the single S2AI screws group. However, the reoperation rate was similar between the 2 groups (24.1% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.26). No significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes as well as proximal junctional kyphosis (10.8% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.25) and proximal junctional failure (9.6% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.18) were identified between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The dual S2AI screw fixation technique showed more advantages over the single S2AI screw fixation technique with reduced incidence of screw dislodgment, rod fractures, and sacral-alar-iliac screw loosening.

Assessment of two entry points for S2 alar-iliac screw in a Japanese cohort using three-dimensional computed tomography scan.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbosacral fusion supplemented with sacropelvic fusion has recently been increasingly employed for correcting spinal deformity and is associated with lower incidence of pseudarthrosis and implant failure. To date, few studies have evaluated anatomical parameters and technical feasibility between different entry points for S2 alar-iliac screws. PURPOSE: To compare anatomical parameters and technical feasibility of two entry points for the S2 alar-iliac screw (S2AIS) in a Japanese cohort using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifteen men and 15 women aged 50-79 years who underwent pelvic CT at our hospital in 2013. OUTCOME MEASURES: Screw length, lateral angulation, caudal angulation, angle range, distance from the entry point to the sacroiliac joint, distance from the S2AIS to the acetabular roof, distance from the S2AIS to the sciatic notch, and insertion difficulty. METHODS: We used 30 pelvic CT images (15 men and 15 women). We selected two entry points from previous studies: one was 1 mm distal and 1 mm lateral to the S1 dorsal foramen (A group) and the other was the midpoint between the S1 and S2 dorsal foramen (B group). We resliced the plane in which the pelvis was sectioned obliquely from these entry points to the anterior inferior iliac spine in the sagittal plane. We placed the shortest and longest virtual S2AISs bilaterally in this plane using a 4-mm margin. We measured screw length, lateral angulation, caudal angulation, angle range, distance from the entry point to the sacroiliac joint, distance from the S2AIS to the acetabular roof, distance from the S2AIS to the sciatic notch, and insertion difficulty. These measurements were compared between Groups A and B. RESULTS: In group A, the angle in the sagittal plane was significantly smaller and the distance from the entry point to the sciatic notch was significantly longer than in group B. Group B demonstrated a significantly longer screw length, longer distance from the entry point to the sacroiliac joint, and longer distance from the entry point to the acetabular roof than group A. The rate of insertion difficulty of S2AIS was much higher in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of S2AIS from the midpoint between the S1 and S2 dorsal foramen compared with the entry at distal and lateral to S1 foramen enables insertion of longer screws with low insertion difficulty.

Anatomic trajectory for iliac screw placement adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual than the S2 alar iliac screw: a radiological study.

PURPOSE: The iliac fixation (IF) through the S2 ala permits the minimization of implant prominence and tissue dissection. An alternative to this technique is the anatomic iliac screw fixation (AI), which considers the perpendicular axis to the narrowest width of the ileum and the width of the screw. The morphological accuracy of the iliac screw insertion of two low profile iliac fixation (IF) techniques is investigated in this study. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients operated on via low profile IF technique were divided into two groups, those treated using 28 screws with the starting point at S2, and those treated with 30 AI entry point. Radiological parameters (Tsv-angle, Sag-Angle, Max-length, sacral-distance, iliac-width, S2-midline, skin-distance, iliac-wing, and PSIS distance) and clinical outcomes (early and clinic complications) were evaluated by two blinded expert radiologists, and the results were compared in both groups with the real trajectory of the screws placed. RESULTS: Differences between ideal and real trajectories were observed in 6 of the 9 evaluated parameters in the S2AI group. In the AI group, these trajectories were similar, except for TSV-Angle, Max-length, Iliac-width, and distance to iliac-wing parameters. Moreover, compared with S2AI, AI provided better adaptation to the pelvic morphology in all parameters, except for sagittal plane angulation, skin distance, and iliac width. CONCLUSIONS: AI ensures the advantages of low profile pelvic fixation like S2AI, with a starting point in line with S1 pedicle anchors and low implant prominence, and moreover adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual.

Modified unilateral iliac screw fixation with partial reduction in the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis at L5/S1 in adult patients: introduction of key technique, report of clinical outcomes and analysis of spinopelvic parameters.

BACKGROUND: Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains challenging. Spinopelvic fixation such as iliac screw (IS) was developed to deal with HGS. However concerns regarding constructs prominence and increased infection-related revision surgery have complicated it's use. We aim to introduce the modified iliac screw (IS) technique in treating high-grade L5/S1 spondylolisthesis and it's clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: Patients with L5/S1 HGS who underwent modified IS fixation were enrolled. Pre- and postsurgical upright full spine radiographs were obtained to analyze sagittal imbalance, spinopelvic parameters, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), slip percentage, slip angle (SA), and lumbosacral angle (LSA). Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively for clinical outcomes assessment. Estimated blood loss, operating time, perioperative complications and revision surgery were documented. RESULTS: From Jan 2018 to March 2020, 32 patients (15 males) with mean age of 58.66 ± 7.77 years were included. The mean follow-up period was 49 months. The mean operation duration was 171.67 ± 36.66 min. At the last follow-up: (1) the VAS and ODI score were significantly improved (p < 0.05), (2) PI increased by an average of 4.3°, the slip percent, SA and LSA were significantly improved (p < 0.05), (3) four patients (16.7%) with global sagittal imbalance recovered a good sagittal alignment, PI-LL within ± 10° was observed in all patients. One patient experienced wound infection. One patient underwent a revision surgery due to pseudoarthrosis at L5/S1. CONCLUSION: The modified IS technique is safe and effective in treating L5/S1 HGS. Sparing use of offset connector could reduce hardware prominence, leading to lower wound infection rate and less revision surgery. The long-term clinical affection of increased PI value is unknown.

Complex surgical reconstruction for spinopelvic instability caused by a giant Tarlov cyst eroding the sacrum: A case report.

Background: Tarlov cysts (TC), also known as perineural cysts are meningeal dilations of the posterior nerve root sheath that typically affect sacral nerve roots. TC are usually asymptomatic and found incidentally. We present the case of a patient with an enlarging sacral TC causing pain from spinopelvic instability secondary to extensive bone erosion. Such illustrative case is intended to increase awareness of the potential need for complex spinopelvic reconstruction in atypical instances of large TC. Case Description: A 29-year-old female presented to clinic reporting progressive bilateral sacroiliac joint pain that was essentially mechanical in nature. The patient had a normal neurological exam except for a known left drop foot with numbness in the left sural nerve distribution, both attributed to a previously resected peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large multilobulated lesion with imaging characteristics consistent with TC adjacent to the left side of the sacrum, extending outward from the left S1 and S2 neural foramina and measuring 6.7 × 3.7 cm in the axial plane and and 5.6 cm in the sagittal plane. Six weeks of conservative management consisting of physical therapy and pain management was unsuccessful, and the patient reported worsening pain. Surgical reconstruction consisting of L5-S1 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, L4 to pelvis navigation-guided instrumentation and posterolateral fusion, and bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion was successfully performed. Outcomes: At 12 weeks follow-up appointment after surgery, the patient reported resolution of sacroiliac mechanical pain. Conclusions: Sacral TC are asymptomatic in their vast majority of cases but may occasionally cause neurological deficits secondary to mass effect. Rarely, however, giant TC can also lead to significant bone erosion or the sacrum with secondary spinopelvic instability. In this brief report, we describe a giant TC generating significant spinopelvic instability, which was successfully treated with complex spinopelvic reconstruction, leading to complete resolution of the reported axial mechanical pain.

Encountering pelvic tuberculosis in closed pelvic ring injury with distant wound - An intraoperative surprise: A case report.

Delayed presentation of closed APC type III pelvic ring injury with a healing wound on the medial thigh, in a twenty-six-year-old male, at four weeks. We planned Symphyseal plating and sacroiliac screw fixation surgery. After percutaneous screw fixation, subsequent pelvic exposure revealed whitish cheesy pus in the retropubic space. Hence, we changed surgery from internal fixation to a supra-acetabular external fixator. Subsequent molecular testing documented tuberculosis and regimen of antitubercular medications was started. Complete functional recovery was observed at 12 months. While managing pelvic injuries, alternative backup treatment plans should be kept ready in view of infective foci.

Finite element analysis of sacral-alar-iliac screw fixation for sacroiliac joint dislocation.

The percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screw is a common fixation option for posterior ring disruption in pelvic fractures. However, SI screw placement is difficult and can injure adjacent neurovascular structures. The sacral-alar-iliac screw (SAI) is a safe, reliable free-hand sacral pelvic fixation technique. To investigate the biomechanical stability of SAI for SI joint dislocation, finite element analysis was performed in unstable Tile-Type B and C pelvic ring injuries. The displacement in S1 (fixation of a unilateral S1 segment with one SI screw), TS1 (fixation of the S1 segment with a transsacra 1 screw), TS2 (fixation of the S2 segment with a transsacra 2 screw), S1AI, and S2AI exceeded the normal SI joint mobility. Sufficient stability after SI joint dislocation was obtained with (TS1 + TS2), (TS2 + S1), (S1AI + S2AI + rod), (S1AI + S2AI), and (S1 + S2AI + S1 pedicle) fixation. The TS1 + TS2 group had the smallest displacement and lowest peak screw stress, followed by (S1 + S2AI + S1 pedicle) placement. Our findings suggest that SAI screws are a valuable option for SI joint dislocation.

Is There a Difference in Screw Accuracy, Robot Time Per Screw, Robot Abandonment, and Radiation Exposure Between the Mazor X and the Renaissance? A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 1179 Robot-Assisted Screws.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective single-cohort analysis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes/complications of 2 robotic systems for spine surgery. METHODS: Adult patients (≥18-years-old) who underwent robot-assisted spine surgery from 2016-2019 were assessed. A propensity score matching (PSM) algorithm was used to match Mazor X to Renaissance cases. Preoperative CT scan for planning and an intraoperative O-arm for screw evaluation were preformed. Outcomes included screw accuracy, robot time/screw, robot abandonment, and radiation. Screw accuracy was measured using Vitrea Core software by 2 orthopedic surgeons. Screw breach was measured according to the Gertzbein/Robbins classification. RESULTS: After PSA, a total of 65 patients (Renaissance: 22 vs. X: 43) were included. Patient/operative factors were similar between robot systems (P > .05). The pedicle screw accuracy was similar between robots (Renaissance: 1.1%% vs. X: 1.3%, P = .786); however, the S2AI screw breach rate was significantly lower for the X (Renaissance: 9.5% vs. X: 1.2%, P = .025). Robot time per screw was not statistically different (Renaissance: 4.6 minutes vs. X: 3.9 minutes, P = .246). The X was more reliable with an abandonment rate of 2.3% vs. Renaissance:22.7%, P = .007. Radiation exposure were not different between robot systems. Non-robot related complications including dural tear, loss of motor/sensory function, and blood transfusion were similar between robot systems. CONCLUSION: This is the first comparative analyses of screw accuracy, robot time/screw, robot abandonment, and radiation exposure between the Mazor X and Renaissance systems. There are substantial improvements in the X robot, particularly in the perioperative planning processes, which likely contribute to the X's superiority in S2AI screw accuracy by nearly 8-fold and robot reliability by nearly 10-fold.

Safe Zones for Spinopelvic Screws in Patients With Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched-pair analysis. OBJECTIVES: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) have a reported prevalence of 4-36% in the population. The safe zones for screw placement for spinopelvic fusion in adult spinal deformity surgery for patients with LSTV have not been described in the literature. Our study aimed to assess the safety of S1-pedicle screw (S1PS), S2-alar screw (S2AS), S2-alar-iliac screw (S2AIS), and iliac screw (IS) placement in patients with LSTV. METHODS: Out of the 819 examined patients, 49 patients with LSTV were included in our retrospective analysis with a matched pair control group. We used the 3-dimensional planning tool mediCAD for screw placement of S1PS, S2AS, S2AIS, IS with different angles, length and diameters. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 10 192 screw trajectories. No serious complications occurred due to the trajectories used for S1PS. LSTV increased the risk of vessel injury for S2AS trajectories (P = .001) but not for S2AIS (P = .526). Besides the presence of an LSTV, the screw trajectory had a major influence on the frequency of serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral anchoring of long spinal constructions using S1PS, S2AS, S2AIS and IS is also possible in the presence of LSTV. For S2AS the trajectory with 30° lateral and caudal angulation of 10° showed the least vascular injuries and the least sacro-iliac-joint violations in patients with LSTV. S2AIS trajectories with 40° lateral and 0° sagittal angulation reduced the risk of serious complications in our patients collective with LSTV.

A Computed Tomography-Based Assessment of the Anatomical Parameters Concerning S2-Alar Iliac Screw Insertion Using "Safe Trajectory Method" in Indian Population.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based radiological analysis. PURPOSE: To obtain CT-based morphometric data for the S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screw in the Indian population presenting to School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, we used the concept of "safe trajectory" by Pontes and his colleagues in a recent study. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although previous CT-based morphometric studies on the S2AI screw have been published for a variety of ethnic groups, morphometric data specifically for the Indian population are scarce. METHODS: We used the three-dimensional multiplanar reformatting software to conduct a retrospective CT analysis of 112 consecutive patients who met our exclusion criteria for various abdominal and pelvic pathologies. CT imaging planes were rotated between the S1 and S2 foramen until they matched the ideal S2AI screw trajectory, which was represented by the longest and widest iliac osseous channel observed in the axial CT section. Following the concept of a safe trajectory, S2AI screw morphometric parameters were measured on both sides of the pelvis using corresponding axial and sagittal CT images. RESULTS: In the sagittal and transverse planes on both sides of the pelvis, females had significantly higher screw trajectory angulation than males (p<0.001). On both sides of the pelvis, males had significantly greater iliac width, maximum screw trajectory length, and intrascrotal length than females (p<0.001). On both sides of the pelvis, the S2AI screw entry point in females was significantly deeper than in males from the skin margin (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our methodology, we discovered that the S2AI screw trajectory is significantly more caudal and lateral in females, the maximum screw length is sufficient for use in clinical practice regardless of gender, and that 8.5 mm or even larger screw diameters are feasible in the majority of the Indian population.

Biomechanical investigation of S2 alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of Denis type II sacral fractures.

Although S2 alar-iliac screw technique has been widely used in spinal surgery, its applicability to pelvic fractures is largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of S2 alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of Denis II sacral fractures. Twenty-eight artificial pelvic fracture models were treated with unilateral lumbopelvic fixation, sacroiliac screw fixation, S2 alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation, and S2 alar-iliac screw and contralateral S1 pedicle screw fixation (Groups 1-4, respectively; N = 7 per group). Each model was cyclically tested under increasing axial compression. Optical motion-tracking was used to assess relative displacement and gap angle, and the number of failure cycles. Relative displacement was significantly smaller in Group 3 than in Groups 1 (p = 0.004) and 4 (p < 0.001) but not significantly different between Groups 3 and 2 (p = 0.290). The gap angle in Group 3 was significantly smaller than that in Group 1 (p = 0.009) on the sagittal plane but significantly larger than that in Group 4 (p = 0.006) on the horizontal plane. A number of failure cycles was significantly higher in Group 3 than in Groups 1 (p = 0.002) and 4 (p = 0.004) but not significantly different between Groups 3 and 2 (p = 0.910). From a biomechanical perspective, S2 alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation can provide good stability in the treatment of Denis II sacral fractures.