In situ laser fenestration of aortic septum to bridge false and true lumen during endovascular repair of aortic dissection.

Fenestration of the septum between the true and false lumen might be necessary after aortic dissection. We report the technical aspects of in situ laser fenestration of the aortic dissection septum. Two illustrative cases are provided: a 56-year-old man with false lumen deployment of a frozen elephant trunk graft, and a 67-year-old man who underwent fenestrated endovascular aortic repair with a target branch vessel off the false lumen. In both cases, the septum was crossed using in situ laser fenestration. This technique is a precise option to enable passage between true and false lumens during endovascular repair of an aortic dissection.

The Electrified Wire Technique in Complex Aortic Interventions: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: Electrosurgery has been long used in endovascular procedures, with only case reports in the aortic field. Our aim is to present a case series with the use of an electrified wire to perform catheter-based electrosurgery by applying external current through an electrocautery pen. METHODS: Single-center retrospective case series of all patients undergoing complex aortic surgery from October 2020 to August 2023, in whom the electrified wire technique was used: (1) Perforation of a dissection flap or left subclavian artery (LSA) in situ endograft fenestration-a 0.014" polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) insulated guidewire is detached from the insulation with a scalpel at the end and a cautery pen is here attached with a clamp. A curved tip catheter or sheath is positioned against the aortic flap or the endograft (through a left brachial access in this case) and the wire pushed, crossing the flap by activating the electrocautery pen and (2) slicing a dissection flap ("powered cheese-wire technique")-after same preparation as above, the middle section of the 0.014 guidewire is removed from the PTFE and bent into a V-shape. Once in the aorta, the guidewire crosses from the true lumen (TL) to the false lumen (FL) and a through-and-through access is obtained. Sheaths are positioned against the flap from both sides and moved up or down while the electricity is activated, slicing the flap and communicating both lumens. Technical success and technical-related complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven cases concerning aortic dissections and 1 case of aortic atresia were treated. Four patients presented urgently, whereas the rest were planned procedures. Seven cases underwent perforation of a dissection flap, 2 cases underwent the powered cheese-wire technique, in 2 cases for an LSA in situ fenestration, and in 1 case to cross an aortic atresia at the aortic isthmus. The technique was in all cases successfully applied. No complications related to the technique occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The "electrified wire" technique is a feasible and ready-available tool that can be safely used in complex aortic interventions, especially to perforate aortic tissue like dissection flaps or to perform in situ fenestrated repairs by perforation of the endograft fabric. CLINICAL IMPACT: The electrified wire technique described herein is a straightforward technique that uses readily available tools to perform electrosurgery. We present its use in complex aortic procedures. However, it could be envisioned for any vascular procedure that requires crossing of the vessel or even prosthetic material. As we have described in this series, when used along with an adequate properative planning, it can be a safe tool of great utility, as has already been demonstarted in the field of the interventional cardiology.

Endovascular repair combined with in situ fenestration for new-onset or residual arch dissection in patients underwent aortic replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Ascending aorta or hemi-arch replacement is a frequently used treatment for patients with acute type A thoracic aortic dissection, particularly those who are elderly or have multiple comorbidities. However, in cases where there are secondary entry tears in the aortic arch or descending aorta, this procedure may not fully resolve the issue. The true lumen may remain compressed due to perfusion of the false lumen and usually require reoperation. METHODS: Between January 2019 and July 2022, 18 patients underwent endovascular total aortic arch repair and fenestration technique without requiring median re-sternotomy. Aortic stent grafts were implanted via the femoral approach, utilizing prosthetic vessels as an appropriate proximal landing zone for aortic stent graft deployment. Based on the debranching conditions of the arch in previous surgery, single, double or triple in situ fenestrations (ISFs) were performed, respectively. RESULTS: All 18 cases were technically successful, with a median follow-up period of 20 months (range: 18-31 months). All patients had a favourable postoperative course, with no deaths within 30 days or during their hospital stay. There were no instances of disabling stroke, paraplegia, endo-leak, stent graft migration or stent graft-induced new entry. In addition, all patients exhibited complete thrombosis of the false lumen at the level of the aortic arch. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience suggests that endovascular total arch repair combined with ISF technique is a viable, effective and safe option for treatment. Our mid-term results have been promising, but we acknowledge the need for further evaluation to assess long-term outcomes and durability.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of laser, needle, and "quick fenestrater" in in situ fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Background: Special instruments are needed for the revascularization of aortic branches in in situ fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This prospective study compared the effectiveness and safety of three currently used fenestraters: laser, needle, and Quick Fenestrater (QF). Methods: In all, 101 patients who underwent TEVAR for aortic disease (dissection, n = 62; aneurysm, n = 16, or ulcer, n = 23) were enrolled. All patients were randomly assigned to three groups: 34 were assigned to laser fenestration, 36 to needle fenestration, and 31 to QF fenestration. The epidemiological data, treatment, imaging findings, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed using data from the medical records. Results: The technical success rates of the laser, needle, and QF fenestration groups were 94.1%, 94.4%, and 100% (p > 0.05). After correction of mixed factors such as age and gender, it was showed the average operative time (Laser group: 130.01 ± 9.36 min/ Needle group: 149.80 ± 10.18 min vs. QF group: 101.10 ± 6.75 min, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (Laser group: 30.16 ± 9.81 min/ Needle group: 40.20 ± 9.91 min vs. QF group: 19.91 ± 5.42 min, p < 0.001), fenestration time (Laser group 5.50 ± 3.10 min / Needle group 3.50 ± 1.50 min vs. QF group 0.67 ± 0.06 min, p < 0.001), and guide wire passage time after fenestration (Laser group 5.10 ± 1.70 min / Needle group 4.28 ± 1.60 min vs. QF group 0.07 ± 0.01 min, p < 0.001) were all shorter with QF fenestration than with the other two tools. The overall perioperative complication rates of the laser, needle, and QF fenestration groups were 5.9%, 5.6%, and 0% (p > 0.05): One case of sheath thermal injury and one case of vertebral artery ischemia occurred in the laser fenestration group; one case each of access site hematoma and brachial artery thrombosis were reported in the needle fenestration group. 89 (88.1%, 89/101) patients were followed for a median of 12.6 ± 1.6 months. The overall postoperative complication rates of the laser, needle, and QF fenestration groups were 3.3%, 6.5%, and 0% (p > 0.05): In the laser fenestration group, there was one death due to postoperative ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; in the needle fenestration group, one patient developed occlusion of the bridge stent; no complications occurred in the QF group. Conclusion: All three fenestration methods were effective in reconstructing supra-arch artery during TEVAR. QF fenestration required less contrast agent, with a shorter surgery duration and fewer complications than laser and needle fenestration.

Effects of Long Term Fatigue Cycling on In Situ Fenestrations of Polyethylene Terephthalate and Expanded Polytetrafluorethylene Thoracic Aortic Stent grafts: An Experimental Study.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the long term durability of fenestrations after in situ fenestration (ISF) of five commercial thoracic aortic stent grafts was evaluated in an in vitro experiment after a simulated 10 year period. METHODS: Five different thoracic aortic stent grafts (Relay, Valiant, Hercules, TAG, and Ankura, with a diameter of 34 mm) received both needle and laser ISF in vitro. A Viabahn (11 × 50 mm) was released in each fenestration as a bridging stent graft. Long term fatigue tests (simulating 10 years) of each of the fenestrated stent grafts were then conducted in a flow fatigue test system. The area, shape, margin, and the long and short axis of all the fenestrations were evaluated with light microscopy before and after the fatigue test. The leakage from the fenestration junction before and after the long term fatigue was also measured. RESULTS: The experimental results showed no obvious difference between needle and laser fenestrations. The long axes of all the fenestrations remained unchanged, while the short axes increased after the fatigue test, which was significant in Relay, Valiant, and Hercules polyethylene terephthalate stent grafts. The shape scores of fenestrations improved after the fatigue test in Valiant and Hercules, remained unchanged in Relay and Ankura, and worsened in the TAG. After the fatigue cycling, the average leakage from the fenestration junction decreased in all the stent grafts, and the Ankura had the maximum decline rate. CONCLUSION: The ISF technique was durable over a simulated 10 year period. The fenestrations were positively remodelled to be more circular, and the leakage from the junction decreased after long term fatigue testing.

Case report: Total arch replacement with a frozen elephant trunk utilizing open hybrid in-situ fenestration technique for thoracic aortic arch aneurysm.

Introduction: The frozen elephant trunk technique is a surgical procedure developed for concomitant repair of downstream descending thoracic aorta as a first stage operation for arch resections. Proximalization of the sutured anastomosis reduces technical difficulty of total arch replacement. In this procedure, an anastomosis is performed more proximally using a stent graft. Connect the head and neck vessels are created using in-situ fenestration method. Case presentation: This study presents the case of a 78-year-old woman with a large thoracic aortic arch aneurysm that was successfully treated with a modified frozen elephant trunk technique (open in situ fenestration). For this method, a hole was created in the neck branches (the left subclavian artery and left common carotid artery), and peripheral stent grafts were placed to simplify neck branch reconstruction. This minimized the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and bleeding and shortened the procedure time. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study showed a safe alternative total arch replacement procedure.

Novel TEVAR technique for thoracic aortic aneurysm repair: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: A thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is a life-threatening condition affecting 5-10 per 100,000 people per year. If not repaired, mortality rates are reported as high as 11.8 %, increasing to 97 %-100 % following a TAA rupture. Thoracic endovascular aortic repairs (TEVAR) are becoming more common, but currently face limitations due to complex vasculature. New techniques may provide a safer alternative. CASE PRESENTATION: 70-year-old male presenting with a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and previous replacement of ascending aorta and hemi arch with reimplantation of innominate artery done in 2020. A CT scan done during routine interval monitoring of previous TAA repair demonstrated a new aneurysm, which was confirmed with CT angiogram. A novel TEVAR technique was used for repair. The patient tolerated this procedure well and was discharged from the ICU after six days. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Open procedures and hybrid techniques for TAA repair are not always suitable for high-risk patients. Alternative parallel grafting techniques have shown promising early results but still lack clinical support and long-term data. Several small-scale studies and case reports have demonstrated the use of in-situ laser fenestrations in various settings, but none have demonstrated the ability to extend the landing zone as far as zone 0 for repair of a Type B TAA. CONCLUSION: The use of this novel technique may be considered suitable in high-risk patients with various subtypes of TAAs not suitable for open repair. More cases and clinical trials are needed to compare risks and long-term results to more commonly performed procedures.

Stent-Graft Fabrics Incorporating a Specific Corona Ready to Fenestrate.

In situ fenestration of endovascular stent-grafts has become a mainstream bailout technique to treat complex emergent aneurysms while maintaining native anatomical visceral and aortic arch blood supplies. Fabric tearing from creating the in situ fenestration using balloon angioplasty may extend beyond the intended diameter over time. Further tearing may result from the physiologic pulsatile motion at the branching site. A resultant endoleak at the fenestrated sites in stent-grafts could ultimately lead to re-pressurization of the aortic sac and, eventually, rupture. In an attempt to address this challenge, plain woven fabrics were designed. They hold a specific corona surrounding a square-shaped cluster with a plain weave fabric structure, a 2/2 twill, or a honeycomb. The corona was designed to stop potential further tearing of the fabric caused by the initial balloon angioplasty and stent or later post-implantation motion. The cluster within the corona was designed with relatively loose fabric structures (plain weave, 2/2 twill weave, and honeycomb) to facilitate the laser fenestration. Two commercial devices, Anaconda (Vascutek, Terumo Aortic) and Zenith TX2 (Cook), were selected as controls for comparison against this new design. All the specimens were characterized by morphology, thickness, and water permeability. The results demonstrated that all specimens with a low thickness and water permeability satisfied the requirements for a stent graft material that would be low profile and resistant to endoleaks. The in situ fenestrations were performed on all fabrics utilizing an Excimer laser followed by balloon angioplasty. The fabrics were further observed by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The dimension of the fenestrated apertures was smaller than the balloon's diameter. The tearing was effectively confined within the corona. The clinical acceptability of this concept deserves additional bench testing and animal experimentation.

Early and midterm outcomes of in situ fenestration via adjustable puncture needle for Ankura aortic stent graft: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: An analysis was conducted to demonstrate early and midterm outcomes of using adjustable puncture needle-based in situ fenestration (ISF) technique for Ankura aortic stent graft to reconstruct the supra-arch branch in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 68 cases of aortic lesions with insufficient proximal anchoring area admitted to our department from March 2017 to December 2021 was performed. In situ fenestration thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) was performed at the same time during the operation. Among them, there were fifty-eight cases of thoracic aortic dissection, seven cases of thoracic aortic aneurysm, and three cases of thoracic aortic ulcer. Intraoperative adjustable puncture with needle was used for the Ankura aorta stent graft to perform ISF and reconstruction of the supra-arch branch. RESULTS: The success rate of ISF was 94.1% (64/68). Only in four cases, attempts were made to create ISF in the left subclavian artery (LSA), and all the four were unsuccessful because of sharp and tortuosity angle. Among them, forty-four cases were only LSA fenestration, and one case was left common carotid artery (LCCA) fenestration + LSA embolism. LSA + left vertebral artery (LVA) fenestration was performed in two cases, LSA fenestration +LCCA chimney was performed in fourteen cases, LCCA + LSA fenestration + innominate artery (INA) chimney was performed in one case, and LCCA fenestration + INA chimney + LSA embolism was performed in two cases. The overall neurologic event rate was 3.1% (spinal cord ischemia 0, with stroke observed in two cases). Postoperatively, one patient (1.6%) died on the third day after TEVAR due to the retrograde dissections. There were four cases of endoleak (6.3%; three type I and one type II). The average follow-up was 29.2 ± 14.4 months, and no patient died during the follow-up period. Three cases of endoleak disappeared, and one case did not increase further. In addition, other two cases of retrograde dissections were observed at 3 and 5 months after TEVAR. Fortunately, they were scheduled for emergency surgery with ascending aorta replacement and improved well. There was only one case of LSA occlusion after ISF which was reconstructed by endovascular treatment. Two patients were found with distal stent graft-induced new entries (dSINE), and TEVAR was performed again during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Early and midterm outcomes demonstrated that ISF via the adjustable puncture needle device for the Ankura aorta stent graft is a feasible and effective treatment method, which can achieve high technical success and satisfactory short-term results.

Emergent endovascular treatment options for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

For a long time, parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, and, more recently, in situ fenestration were the only go-to endovascular options for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, offered mixed results, and depended mainly on the operator's and center's experience. As custom-made devices have become an established endovascular treatment option for elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, they are not a viable option in the emergency setting, as endograft production can take up to 4 months. The development of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranched devices with a standardized configuration has allowed the treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with emergent branched endovascular procedures. The Zenith t-Branch device (Cook Medical) was the first readily available graft outside the United States to receive the CE mark (in 2012) and is currently the most studied device for those indications. A new device, the E-nside thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (Artivion), has been made commercially available, and the GORE EXCLUDER thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates) is expected to be released in 2023. Due to the lack of guidelines on ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, this review summarizes the available treatment options (ie, parallel grafts, physician-modified endografts, in situ fenestrations, and OTS multibranched devices), compares the indications and contraindications, and points out the evidence gaps that should be filled in the next decade.

Physician-modified fenestration or in situ fenestration for preservation of isolated left vertebral artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Objective: To present our experience of preserving the isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) with physician-modified fenestration (PM-F) or in situ fenestration (ISF) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic pathologies involving aortic arch. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. Between June 2016 and December 2021, 9 patients (8 men; median age 60.0 years old) underwent TEVAR with ILVA reconstruction (PM-F, n = 6; ISF, n = 3) were identified and analyzed. Results: The technical success rate was 100%. No early (<30 days) death occurred. No aortic rupture, major stroke or spinal cord injury was observed. The median follow up was 38.0 (rang: 1.0-66.0) months. One death occurred at 56 months, while the reason cannot be identified. No aortic rupture, major stroke or spinal cord injury was observed during follow up. No patient required reintervention. Out of the 22 successfully revascularized target vessels, 2 ILVAs were found occluded in 2 patients at 6 months and 7 months, respectively. However, these two patients were asymptomatic. Conclusions: Our initial experience reveals that PM-F or ISF for ILVA preservation was feasible, safe, and effective during TEVAR for complex thoracic aortic pathologies. However, the patency of preserved ILVA should be improved.

Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair with quick fenestrater assisted in situ fenestration for type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: To report the long-term outcomes of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and quick fenestrated (QF)-assisted in situ fenestration (ISF). METHODS: Between October 2017 and December 2018, 15 patients with TBAD requiring revascularization of the supra-aortic trunks underwent TEVAR with QF-assisted ISF at our institution. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 15 patients were male, and the mean age was 52.87 ± 11.26. The technical success rate was 100%. Thirty-day mortality rate was 0. The median follow-up period was 41 months (range, 35-49). During follow-up, one non-aortic-related death was recorded, no fenestration lost its alignment, and no stroke or stent graft migration was observed. Two patients underwent another successful endovascular repair. One case of type Ib endoleak occurred 19 months postoperatively. This was caused by aortic progression distal to the stent graft. Another stent graft with a larger diameter was implanted in the descending aorta. One case of type Ic endoleak was observed 35 months postoperatively. The patient was diagnosed during the annual follow-up without any symptoms. Another bridging stent graft was implanted into the left subclavian artery distal to the already existing one, and the type Ic endoleak was successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR with QF-assisted ISF may be an effective treatment for ISF in type B aortic dissection.

Results of the in situ fenestration technique for preservation of the Left subclavian artery in the endovascular repair of acute aortic syndromes in a reference center.

INTRODUCTION: The in situ fenestration (ISF) technique consists of maintaining the patency of the aortic branch after the endoprosthesis is already in place as a viable, effective, and fast-performing alternative to revascularize the aortic arch arteries. OBJECTIVE: To report the experience with a series of cases of endovascular treatment of Acute Aortic Syndromes involving the aortic arch, using the ISF technique in a specialized center. METHODS: We analyzed data collected from patients treated with ISF during TEVAR for Acute Aortic Syndromes involving the aortic arch from June 2020 to January 2022, assessing perioperative outcomes, including immediate and late success rates, complications, morbidity and mortality, and short and medium term aortic branch patency. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients eligible for the ISF procedure, 9 were successful, with a technical success rate of 81%. No patient had a type 1A endoleak related to fenestration. There was complete thrombosis of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta in 77% cases. No death was related to the fenestration technique. CONCLUSION: ISF as feasible and with a high rate of technical success and good results in the short and medium term. Prospective studies with long-term clinical follow-up are still needed to fully assess the durability of these unreinforced fenestrations.

In Situ Fenestrated Thoracic Endovascular Repair Using the Upstream Peripheral Go BackTM Re-Entry Catheter.

PURPOSE: The aim is to present a case of in situ fenestrated thoracic endovascular repair, using a re-entry peripheral catheter, needing urgent repair due to recurrent episodes of hemoptysis because of an aorto-bronchial fistula after previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). TECHNIQUE: A 74-year-old male with a previous TEVAR presented with hemoptysis, fever, and cachexia. An aorto-bronchial fistula and type Ia endoleak were depicted on computed tomography angiography (CTA). Due to the patient's frail general condition, a proximal TEVAR extension was planned, prior to thoracotomy for debridement, and long-term antibiotics. An in situ fenestrated TEVAR was performed to provide proximal sealing and revascularize the left common carotid and subclavian arteries. For fenestration creation, an Upstream Peripheral Go Back catheter (Bentley, Hechingen, Germany) was used. The Go Back catheter has been approved as a re-entry tool for complex peripheral arterial revascularization. In this case, both fenestrations were successfully created. Proximal seal and target vessel patency were confirmed on CTA. Thoracotomy confirmed aortic exclusion. A wedge lobectomy was performed in combination with pediculated omentectomy to exclude the exposed endograft. CONCLUSION: In urgent cases, where custom-made thoracic devices are unavailable, in situ fenestrations with the Go Back catheter are an alternative to laser fenestrations. CLINICAL IMPACT: Fenestrations are often required in acute TEVAR to achieve a proximal seal in the arch. In situ fenestrations with the Go Back catheter are an alternative to laser fenestrations and PMEGs in this setting.

Enlarging Paravisceral Aortic Aneurysm Treated With In Situ Laser Fenestration of Physician-Modified Stent Graft for Preservation of Accessory Renal Arteries.

PURPOSE: In situ laser fenestration (LISF) was performed as a bailout procedure to ensure renal perfusion during complex aortic aneurysm repair. CASE REPORT: A 69 year-old male patient with previous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm who presented with increasing lower back pain and an enlarging, 6-cm, perivisceral aortic aneurysm that required urgent repair. Given potential complications and risks of redo open repair, we performed endovascular repair via deployment of a 5-vessel fenestrated physician modified stent graft (PMEG) with stent placement to the celiac, superior mesenteric, right renal, and 2 of the larger 3 left renal arteries. The renal artery planned for sacrifice was found intraoperatively to be perfusing a large portion of the kidney. Subsequently, LISF was used to cannulate and salvage perfusion to the third renal artery. Completion aortogram demonstrated patency of all renal visceral vessels with no vessel leak. Follow-up CT angiogram 1 year later demonstrated aortic graft with all visceral stents patent, no endoleak, and a reduction in residual aneurysm sac. CONCLUSION: Even with careful planning and design of a physician modified stent graft, in situ laser fenestration provides an option to successfully create additional stents intraoperatively in order to preserve perfusion to critical visceral organs. CLINICAL IMPACT: In situ laser fenestration will provide surgeons with a valuable intra-operative method to create additional stents when organ perfusion would otherwise be lost. As more surgeons develop this technical ability and more long-term outcomes are studied, this method has the possibility to not only be used for urgent and emergent cases but may one day be an acceptable variation to standard practice.

Internal iliac artery preservation during endovascular aortic repair using in situ laser fenestration.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the technical and short-term clinical outcomes of internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with in situ laser-assisted fenestration in cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in which the iliac artery is unfit for an internal branched device (IBD). METHODS: In the present single-institution retrospective study, we analyzed patients with AAAs who had undergone EVAR with in situ laser-assisted fenestration for IIA reconstruction between January 2018 and April 2021. The study included patients with iliac artery anatomy unfit for the use of commercial IBDs. The primary safety end point was freedom from major adverse events and unplanned reinterventions within 30 days. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from IIA restenosis, reintervention, and symptoms due to pelvic ischemia at 1 year after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients requiring IIA reconstruction but with anatomy unfit for IBD placement were treated with in situ laser-assisted fenestration during EVAR for aortoiliac aneurysms during the study period. The mean age of our patients was 72 years, and 90% were men. The technical success rate was 100%. No patient had died within 30 days after the procedure. A suspicious IIA perforation had occurred in one patient, which was treated with an additional covered stent, for a primary safety end point of 95.0%. After a mean follow-up of 11 months, all except for one of the reconstructed IIAs were patent. Three patients reported symptoms of buttock claudication on the IIA occluded side at their 3-month follow-up after the procedure. However, these symptoms had subsided in two of these patients at 6 months. Type II endoleaks without sac expansion had occurred in two patients owing to retrograde blood flow from the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery. Both patients were kept under close surveillance. The rate of freedom from major adverse events and unplanned reinterventions within 30 days (primary efficacy end point) was 86.3% at 1 year after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In situ laser-assisted fenestration was found to be a safe and effective alternative method for IIA reconstruction during EVAR for aortoiliac aneurysms in patients with anatomy unfit for IBD.

Anatomic Feasibility of In-Situ Fenestration for Isolate Left Subclavian Artery Preservation during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using an Adjustable Needle Puncturing System.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using the Ankura™ device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) with left subclavian artery (LSA) in-situ fenestration (ISF) using an adjustable puncture device system. METHODS: It is a single center, retrospective, financially unsupported cohort study of TEVAR performed from 16 February 2007 to 10 January 2023. Inclusion criteria were isolate LSA revascularization for elective or urgent/emergent "zone 2" TEVAR, and the availability of the preoperative computed tomography angiography. RESULTS: Post-hoc analysis identified 52 TEVARs. There were 39 (75.0%) males, and 13 (25.0%) females: median age was 74.5 years (IQR, 65.5-78). Index TEVAR was performed for atherosclerotic aneurysm in 27 (51.9%) cases, dissection-related diseases in 18 (34.6%), penetrating aortic ulcer in 5 (9.6%), and blunt traumatic aortic injury in 2 (3.8%). Access-vessel feasibility rate of TEVAR using the Ankura™ device would have been 98.1% (51/52). Considering the morphology of the aortic arch, ISF TEVAR feasibility would have been 61.5% (32/52). Binary logistic regression analysis identified LSA angulation (OR: 1.1, 95%CI: 1.03-1.14, p = 0.003) to be associated with ISF feasibility using this endograft and a self-centering adjustable needle-based puncture device. CONCLUSIONS: Potential feasibility of TEVAR using the Ankura™ endograft with ISF using a self-centering adjustable needle system was 61.5%. Left subclavian artery angulation seems to be the most important and limiting anatomical constraint.

A Case of Effective Zone 0 TEVAR Using Squid-Capture Assisted in situ Stent-Graft Fenestration, for Endoleak from the Fenestration of Najuta / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

We report the case of a 76-year-old man who developed type IA endoleak through the fenestration after 1-debranch TEVAR using a Najuta endograft. The patient was admitted with expansion of the aneurysm after TEVAR, for additional therapy. Type IA endoleak through a fenestration has remained a significant clinical concern and its treatment is challenging. We performed Zone 0 TEVAR using the “Squid-Capture” technique assisted in situ stent-graft fenestration. Cerebral vessels were perfused by a percutaneous cardiopulmonary support system during in situ stent-graft fenestration, and the cerebral branch was clamped at the proximal site. It is difficult to operate the catheter inside the endoskeleton structure of a Najuta endograft, but several innovations were effective. Test dilation of the balloon catheter was performed to ensure that the wire did not interfere with the endoskeleton. Avoiding interference with the endoskeleton is important. The Squid-Capture technique allows safe and secure puncture of the graft. The operation was completed successfully. After this procedure, the endoleak disappeared. It is considered to be a useful method for treatment of endoleak through the fenestration.

Endovascular surgery for thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch.

Background: Aortic arch pathologies are serious clinical conditions associated with a very dismal prognosis. Traditional open surgery has a high mortality and is not suitable for critically ill patients. Recently years, endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta has made rapid progress and has been gradually applied to the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. However, maintaining cerebral blood flow during endovascular treatment of aortic arch lesions remains a challenge at this time. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch, and to present initial experience with this technique. Methods: From October 2016 to December 2020, patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. All patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the proximal landing zone of the stent-graft in the aortic arch at Ishimaru zones 0-1, in which cerebral flow needs to be maintained during surgery, and the supra-aortic branches were reconstruction with either in situ fenestration or the chimney technique. Results: A total of 62 cases with lesions involving the arch were treated with endovascular surgery. Total supra-aortic branches reconstruction was successfully performed in 51 cases, the left carotid artery (LCA) and the innominate artery reconstruction were performed in eight cases, the left subclavian artery (LSA) and the LCA were reconstructed in three patients. Among them, the in situ fenestration or chimney repair technique for the LSA was successful performed in 42 and 12 cases. However, in 20 patients, attempts to reconstruction the LSA using the fenestration technique were unsuccessful due to tortuous and angulated vessels. Early mortality was 6.45%. No neurological complications related to surgery occurred. Computer tomography images at post-operative follow-up (mean 3.51 months) confirmed patency of all branch stents without any signs of endoleaks, migration, conversion to retrograde dissection or receive open-heart surgery. Conclusion: The endovascular technique is an effective, feasible, safe and repeatable method to reconstruct the aortic arch, which allows for the reconstruction of the supra-aortic branches.

Type 1A Endoleak after TEVAR in the Aortic Arch: A Review of the Literature.

Aortic arch repair is a challenging intervention. Open surgical repair is still considered the gold standard, but in high-risk patients, it is not always a reasonable option, making endovascular approaches an enticing, when not the only available, alternative for treatment. The strategies more commonly adopted are surgical supra-aortic trunk (SAT) rerouting followed by deployment of a standard thoracic endoprosthesis, chimney techniques, custom-made scalloped, fenestrated, and branched devices, and in situ or physician-modified fenestrations. If we excluded techniques involving SAT rerouting where the arch anatomy is surgically modified in order to make deployment in the aortic arch of a standard thoracic endoprosthesis possible, in the other techniques, one or more SATs are incorporated in the thoracic endoprosthesis. In these cases, no matter what solution is adopted, because of the morphology of the aorta at this level, achieving an ideal sealing is extremely difficult, and endovascular treatments of the arch are burdened by an increased risk of type IA endoleaks. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. We identified 1277 records. After reading titles, abstracts, and full texts, we excluded 1231 records. Exclusion criteria were low-quality evidence, abstracts, case reports, conference presentations, reviews, editorials, and expert opinions. A total of 48 studies were included, for a total of 3114 patients. A type IA endoleak occurred in 248 patients (7.7%) with a mean incidence of 18.8% in chimney procedures, 4.8% and 3%, respectively, in fenestrated and branched devices, and 2.2% in in situ fenestration. We excluded from our analysis scalloped technology that is used when the target vessel originates from a healthy landing zone and represents a different anatomical setting. Type IA endoleaks are a concern with all types of endovascular aortic arch repair, and they can compromise the outcomes of the procedure. The rate of type IA endoleaks appears to be significantly higher in chimney procedures. In order to maximize sealing, whenever possible, endovascular repair of the arch should be achieved with custom-made fenestrated devices. However, chimney configurations are still a valuable solution particularly in the emergency setting, although in such a procedure, to guarantee accurate postoperative management and follow-up, an imaging protocol could be useful.