Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 117: 109490, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484459

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Infection is one of the most feared complications of implant-based breast reconstruction and is difficult to manage in irradiated patients. We present the first case of bilateral breast reconstruction with infected expanders salvaged by performing a reverse abdominoplasty. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 64-year-old woman with a history of locally advanced bilateral breast cancer underwent modified bilateral radical mastectomy and postmastectomy radiotherapy. We performed two-stage breast reconstruction with implants. However, the patient developed a mild infection of the expanders, which was treated with targeted oral antibiotic therapy. The response to treatment was favorable, allowing us to salvage the reconstruction with a reverse abdominoplasty. DISCUSSION: Traditionally, the management of infected breast prostheses has consisted of removal of the infected implant, a complication that forces a delay in the reconstructive process. Successful reports of salvage of infected prostheses have been described in the literature. On the other hand, we were able to salvage the reconstruction by performing a reverse abdominoplasty, which allowed us to resect the irradiated tissue and provide adequate non-irradiated soft tissue coverage for the replaced implants. CONCLUSION: Reverse abdominoplasty offers an acceptable aesthetic result with much less donor site morbidity and represents a valid alternative to other complex reconstruction techniques.

2.
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers ; 26(2): 70-80, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225678

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The primary aims of this study were to determine if any correlation exists in cases of fracture fixation among: (1) bacterial profiles recovered from the instrumentation and adjacent tissues; (2) the type of orthopedic injury; and (3) the clinical outcome-union versus nonunion. A secondary goal was to compare culture and molecular diagnostics for identifying the bacterial species present following fracture fixation. Design: Single-institution, prospective case-control cohort study. Setting: Single level 1 trauma center. Patients: Forty-nine bony nonunion cases undergoing revision internal fixation and 45 healed fracture controls undergoing removal of hardware. Intervention: Bacterial infection was detected by standard microbial culture methods and by a pan-eubacterial domain, molecular diagnostic (MDx) assay. Confirmation of culture and MDx results was achieved with bacterial ribosomal 16S rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to visualize bacterial biofilms. Main Outcome Measurements: MDx and microbial culture methods results were the primary study outcomes. Results: Ninety-four percent of the nonunion cohort and 93% of the union cohort had bacteria detected by the MDx. Seventy-eight percent of the nonunion cases and 69% of the controls were culture negative, but MDx positive. Although no significant differences in bacterial composition were observed between the cases and controls, differences were observed when cases were divided by comorbidities. Conclusion: The MDx is more sensitive than microbial culture in detecting bacterial presence. The lack of significantly different findings with regard to bacterial profile identified between the cases and controls suggests that host factors and environmental conditions are largely responsible for determining if bony union will occur. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Ununited , Bacteria/genetics , Biofilms , Case-Control Studies , Fractures, Ununited/diagnosis , Fractures, Ununited/microbiology , Fractures, Ununited/surgery , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 32(6): 1081-1087, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34342731

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Gastrocnemius flaps provide reliable reconstructive solutions to soft-tissue loss of the knee and proximal tibia following orthopedic procedures. While this technique has been used and studied, little is known about its prophylactic application. Single-stage and delayed approaches were compared with respect to the timing of débridement, complications, and relationship between microorganisms and complications. METHODS: Gastrocnemius flaps for soft-tissue defects of the knee joint were retrospectively reviewed. Success of the flap procedure was defined as a healed soft-tissue envelope, no evidence of infection, a good blood supply to the flap, and adherence of the flap to its bed. Independent sample t test was used to compare the corresponding parameters (level of statistical significance was 0.05). RESULTS: Of 43 flaps (43 patients), 18 were performed during a single-stage procedure along with the orthopedic procedure and 25 were delayed. Success of the single-stage (100%) and delayed flaps (88%) was not significantly different (p = 0.083). Complication rate did not differ significantly for single-stage (11%) and delayed flaps (24%) (p = 0.272). We were unable to establish a relationship between complications and microorganisms. CONCLUSION: Results indicate both approaches are reliable. Single-stage gastrocnemius flaps may eliminate the need for a second surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Therapeutic, Retrospective cohort).


Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Soft Tissue Injuries , Humans , Knee/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Soft Tissue Injuries/etiology , Soft Tissue Injuries/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Tibia/surgery , Treatment Outcome
4.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 42(2): 362-368, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29362942

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The reinsertion of an infected implant when peri-prosthetic infection occurs early after breast augmentation or breast reconstruction remains controversial. In this experimental study, the authors tried to remove bacteria, and their biofilm, from the colonized surface of breast prostheses, without damaging their integrity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 112 shell samples of silicone breast prostheses, smooth (SPSS) and textured (TPSS), were colonized by S. epidermidis (SE) or S. aureus (SA) strains, all able to produce biofilms. After 15 days, all the samples were removed from the contaminated culture broth and constituted 4 groups of 20 contaminated samples: SPSS/SE (group I), SPSS/SA (group II), TPSS/SE (group III), TPSS/SE (group IV). In another group-group SEM-, 16 colonized samples were used for documentation with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The remaining 16 samples were used to test the limits of detection of the sterility test. All samples of groups I-IV and 8 samples of group SEM were « washed ¼ with a smooth brush in a povidone-iodine bath and rinsed with saline solution. A subset of the washed samples was sent for SEM and the others were immersed in sterile broth and were incubated at 35 °C for 3 weeks (groups I-IV). RESULTS: Fifteen days after contamination, all the samples in groups I-IV were colonized. In the SEM group, SEM images attested to the presence of bacteria in biofilm attached to the shells. After cleaning, SEM did not reveal any bacteria and there was no visible alteration in the outer structure of the shell. Sterility tests performed after decontamination in groups I-IV remained negative for all the samples. CONCLUSION: Breast prostheses recently contaminated with Staphylococci, frequently involved in peri-prosthetic breast implant infection and capable of producing biofilms, can be efficiently decontaminated by the procedure used in this study. Our decontamination procedure did not alter the surface structure of the prostheses. This decontamination procedure could allow reinsertion of an infected implant when peri-prosthetic infection occurs early after breast augmentation or breast reconstruction and when a salvage procedure is indicated. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Breast Implants/adverse effects , Decontamination/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Biofilms , Humans , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/methods , Risk Factors , Salvage Therapy/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Silicone Gels
6.
Eplasty ; 17: e13, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28405263

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Biofilms are recognized as a significant deterrent to wound healing and to the management of exposed or infected surgical implants. Biofilms can be disrupted by a variety of enzymatic and mechanical interventions. This experiment was designed to determine whether direct-contact low-frequency ultrasound has the ability to clear biofilms and what then happens to the released bacteria. Methods:Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm was grown on the surfaces of metallic discs composed of titanium and stainless steel, comparable with the alloys used in surgical implants. The discs were treated with a control of irrigation and no ultrasound, followed by the ultrasound for a 10 second of exposure at a mid-level power setting. The irrigation materials used was either normal saline or hypochlorous acid. The effluent was cultured to determine colony-forming units, and the discs were stained with crystal violet to determine whether there was a residual biofilm. Results: The biofilm was cleared completely from all discs when treated with direct-contact low-frequency ultrasound. However, the released bacteria were viable and could be cultured from the effluent when saline was used as the irrigation medium. When hypochlorous acid was used as the irrigation medium, there was complete killing of all planktonic bacteria. Conclusion: Direct-contact low-frequency ultrasound is effective when used to clear biofilms from metallic implant materials. By using hypochlorous acid as the irrigant during treatment, all of the bacteria released from the biofilm were killed as well. The implications for clinical application are important and need to be independently studied.

7.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-630928

ABSTRACT

Sternal metastasis from differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is rare and presents a conundrum for surgeons. We present a lady diagnosed with follicular thyroid carcinoma and sternal metastasis who underwent thyroidectomy, sternectomy and sternoplasty with titanium mesh and acrylic plate. She developed a surgical site infection, of which multiple conservative approaches were attempted. She eventually required removal of the implant. Closure of sternal defect was completed with bilateral pectoralis major advancement flaps. This article highlights a series of complications faced during the course of treatment and how they were managed in a tertiary healthcare centre.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Follicular
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...