Summary of the best evidence for the safe use of pneumatic tourniquet in limb surgery.

PURPOSE: To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best available evidence regarding the safe use of pneumatic tourniquet in patients undergoing Limb surgery, providing guidance for preoperative assessment, operation methods and precautions, complication prevention and treatment in clinical practice. METHODS: Using the PIPOST tool, we formulated an evidence-based question, conducted searches in relevant Chinese and international databases and websites for clinical decisions, guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and expert consensus on the use of limb surgical tourniquets. The search was limited to literature published until September 30, 2023. Quality assessment and evidence extraction were performed on eligible documents. RESULTS: This study included a total of 13 articles, including 2 clinical decision-making articles, 3 guidelines, 5 expert consensus articles, 1 standard and 2 systematic reviews. A total of 34 best pieces of evidence recommendations were summarized across 10 aspects, including indications and contraindications for the use of pneumatic tourniquets, preoperative evaluation of operators, selection and placement of tourniquet cuffs, tourniquet inflation, monitoring during inflation, tourniquet deflation, common complications and prevention, equipment safety, documentation, and training and education. CONCLUSION: The best evidence summarized in this study can provide reference for clinical medical staff to safely use pneumatic tourniquets, but in clinical practice, targeted selection and application of evidence should be combined with specific situations to improve the safety and hemostatic effect of pneumatic tourniquet use.

International expert opinion on the considerations for combining vosoritide and limb surgery: a modified delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Achondroplasia is the most common form of skeletal disorder with disproportionate short stature. Vosoritide is the first disease-specific, precision pharmacotherapy to increase growth velocity in children with achondroplasia. Limb surgery is a standard approach to increase height and arm span, improve proportionality and functionality, as well as correcting deformities. The aim of this study was to gain expert opinion on the combined use of vosoritide and limb surgery in children and adolescents with achondroplasia. METHODS: An international expert panel of 17 clinicians and orthopaedic surgeons was convened, and a modified Delphi process undertaken. The panel reviewed 120 statements for wording, removed any unnecessary statements, and added any that they felt were missing. There were 26 statements identified as facts that were not included in subsequent rounds of voting. A total of 97 statements were rated on a ten-point scale where 1 was 'Completely disagree' and 10 'Completely agree'. A score of ≥ 7 was identified as agreement, and ≤ 4 as disagreement. All experts who scored a statement ≤ 4 were invited to provide comments. RESULTS: There was 100% agreement with several statements including, "Achieve a target height, arm span or upper limb length to improve daily activities" (mean level of agreement [LoA] 9.47, range 8-10), the "Involvement of a multidisciplinary team in a specialist centre to follow up the patient" (mean LoA 9.67, range 7-10), "Planning a treatment strategy based on age and pubertal stage" (mean LoA 9.60, range 8-10), and "Identification of short- and long-term goals, based on individualised treatment planning" (mean LoA 9.27, range 7-10), among others. The sequence of a combined approach and potential impact on the physes caused disagreement, largely due to a lack of available data. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear from the range of responses that this modified Delphi process is only the beginning of new considerations, now that a medical therapy for achondroplasia is available. Until data on a combined treatment approach are available, sharing expert opinion is a vital way of providing support and guidance to the clinical community.

Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Compared with Other Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Distal Upper Limb Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Several regional anesthesia (RA) techniques have been described for distal upper limb surgery. However, the best approach in terms of RA block success rate and safety is not well recognized. Objective: To assess and compare the surgical anesthesia and efficacy of axillary brachial plexus block with other RA techniques for hand and wrist surgery. The attainment of adequate surgical anesthesia 30 min after block placement was considered a primary outcome measure. Additionally, successful block outcomes were required without the use of supplemental local anesthetic injection, systemic opioid analgesia, or the need to convert to general anesthesia. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CENTRAL. RCTs comparing axillary blocks with other brachial plexus block techniques, distal peripheral forearm nerve block, intravenous RA, and the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique were included. Results: In total, 3070 records were reviewed, of which 28 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of adequate surgical anesthesia showed no significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and supraclavicular block (RR: 0.94 [0.89, 1.00]; p = 0.06; I2 = 60.00%), but a statistically significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and infraclavicular block (RR: 0.92 [0.88, 0.97]; p < 0.01; I2 = 53.00%). Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks were performed faster than ultrasound-guided axillary blocks (SMD: 0.74 [0.30, 1.17]; p < 0.001; I2 = 85.00%). No differences in performance time between ultrasound-guided axillary and supraclavicular blocks were demonstrated. Additionally, adequate surgical anesthesia onset time was not significantly different between ultrasound-guided block approaches: ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided supraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.52 [-0.14, 1.17]; p = 0.12; I2 = 86.00%); ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.21 [-0.49, 0.91]; p = 0.55; I2 = 92.00%). Conclusions: The RA choice should be individualized depending on the patient, procedure, and operator-specific parameters. Compared to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular block, ultrasound-guided axillary block may be preferred for patients with significant concerns of block-related side effects/complications. High heterogeneity between studies shows the need for more robust RCTs.

Approaching the Humerus, Elbow, and Proximal Forearm Using the Trimano Arm Holder.

Upper limb surgeons frequently encounter complex cases involving the proximal humerus, elbow joint, and proximal forearm, both in trauma and elective practice. Given the diverse pathology in these areas, various surgical approaches have been described, each with its advantages, limitations, and specific patient positioning requirements. We describe an operative technique that modifies the use of an existing, commercially available, dynamic pneumatic limb positioner, the TRIMANO FORTIS® (Arthrex, Maquet GmbH), for open and arthroscopic procedures of the elbow, proximal forearm, midshaft, and distal humerus. This technique offers simplicity, reproducibility, and enhanced surgical efficiency.

A Giant, Neglected Leiomyosarcoma on the Left Shoulder.

This paper examines the impact of delayed diagnosis and treatment on the prognosis of patients with leiomyosarcomas (LMS). We present a case study highlighting the consequences of neglected LMS, focusing on vascular involvement and metastatic potential. Our findings underscore the importance of early detection and intervention in improving patient outcomes. Additionally, we discuss the challenges associated with diagnosing rare skin LMS and the implications of limited access to medical screening. Through a comprehensive analysis of the literature, we elucidate the critical role of routine surveillance in detecting these malignancies at an earlier stage, thus facilitating timely intervention and potentially curative treatment. This study underscores the urgency of raising awareness among both healthcare providers and the general population about the significance of early detection and prompt management in mitigating the adverse outcomes associated with neglected LMS.

A comparative study between single injection (corner pocket approach) and double injection costoclavicular block: A randomized parallel arm, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that ultrasound guided costoclavicular block may require a double shot to provide adequate, rapid sensory and motor blockade. In this trial, we hypothesized that if the corner pocket approach (between axillary artery and median cord) is used instead of the central approach (at the midpoint of the 3 cords) when performing single-shot costoclavicular block, the onset of blockade would be non-inferior to the double-shot technique. METHOD: Ninety patients undergoing upper limb surgery were randomized to 2 groups for ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block (CCB) at a tertiary hospital. One group received ultrasound guided single-shot CCB using the corner pocket approach and other received ultrasound guided double-shot - the first shot at the centre of the 3 cords and the second between the axillary artery and the median cord. An observer blinded to group assignment recorded blockade onset time (defined as the time required to achieve a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 out of 16 points). RESULTS: Of the 101 patients assessed for eligibility, 90 were recruited over period of 1 year (February 2022 to January 2023), with 45 in each group. Onset time was 22.1 ±â€¯3.1 min in the single-shot group and 22.4 ±â€¯2.9 min in the double-shot group. This difference was insignificant (P = .3). CONCLUSION: Time to onset of blockade and full anaesthesia are similar in single-shot corner pocket CCB vs double-shot CCB. Further studies are required to determine the minimum effective volume of local anaesthetic required for the described technique.

Effects of general and spinal anesthesia on postoperative rehabilitation in older adults after lower limb surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To investigate the effects of perioperative general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) on postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients with lower limb surgery. Methods: This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study included patients aged 65 years or older who underwent lower limb surgery between January 1, 2020, and May 31, 2023. The GA and SA were selected at the request of the orthopedic surgeon, patient, and their family members. The main outcomes included the incidence of the patient's inability to self-care at discharge, postoperative complications including pulmonary infection, thrombus of lower extremity veins, infection of incisional wound and delirium, length of hospital stay, and incidence of severe pain in the first 2 days postoperatively. Results: In total, 697 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 456 were included in the final analysis after propensity score matching. In the GA and SA groups, 27 (11.84%) and 26 (11.40%) patients, respectively, could not care for themselves at discharge. The incidence rates did not differ between the groups (p = 0.884). In contrast, the incidence of postoperative complications (GA: 10.53% and SA: 4.39%; p = 0.013) and the length of hospital stay (GA: 16.92 ± 10.65 days and SA: 12.75 ± 9.15 days; p < 0.001) significantly differed between the groups. Conclusion: The choice of anesthesia is independent of the loss of postoperative self-care ability in older patients (>65 years) and is not a key factor affecting postoperative rehabilitation after lower limb surgery. However, compared with GA, SA reduces the incidence of postoperative complications and a prolonged hospital stay. Thus, SA as the primary anesthetic method is a protective factor against a prolonged hospital stay.

La adición de midazolam intratecal al anestésico local mejora los bloqueos sensorial y motor y reduce la puntuación del dolor sin incrementar los efectos secundarios en la cirugía de miembros inferiores. Metaanálisis y revisión sistemática / Adding intrathecal midazolam to local anesthetics improves sensory and motor block and reduces pain score without increasing side effects in lower limb surgeries: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Este metaanálisis investiga el impacto de midazolam intratecal en la anestesia espinal, el control del dolor postoperatorio y los efectos secundarios relacionados con la anestesia en la cirugía de miembros inferiores. Realizamos una búsqueda en Medline, Science Direct, Google Scholar y Cochrane Library de los estudios que reportaron el inicio y la duración de los bloqueos sensorial y motor, el tiempo transcurrido hasta la primera solicitud de analgesia, el consumo de opioides durante 24h, el control del dolor postoperatorio y los efectos secundarios tras la administración de midazolam intratecal en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de miembros inferiores. Se identificaron 10 estudios, que se incluyeron en el metaanálisis. La revisión fue realizada siguiendo las directrices PRISMA, registrándose en la base de datos PROSPERO (ID-CRD42022346361) en agosto de 2022. Nuestros resultados muestran que los pacientes que reciben 1mg de midazolam intratecal reflejaron un tiempo de inicio de bloqueo significativamente más alto (p=0,001 [IC: −0,98, −0,31]), mayor duración de los bloqueos sensorial y motor (p<0,00001 [IC: 18,08, 39,12]; p=0,002 [IC: 0,45, 2]), y mayor tiempo transcurrido hasta la primera solicitud de analgesia de rescate (p=0,0003 [IC: 1,22, 4,14]). Las puntuaciones de dolor a las 4 y 12h postoperatorias fueron significativamente inferiores en los pacientes que recibieron midazolam intratecal (p=0,00001 [: −1,20, −0,47] y p=0,05 [IC: −0,52, −0,01] respectivamente). En conclusión, la adición de midazolam intratecal al anestésico local en la cirugía de miembros inferiores acorta el tiempo de inicio de los bloqueos sensorial y motor, incrementa la duración del bloqueo y prolonga el tiempo transcurrido hasta la primera solicitud de analgesia. Las puntuaciones del dolor a las 4 y 12horas postoperatorias fueron menores, no observándose efectos secundarios adicionales.(AU)

This meta-analysis was done to investigate the role of intrathecal midazolam in lower limb surgeries regarding prolongation of spinal block, postoperative pain control and associated side effects. The included studies reported onset and duration of sensory and motor block, time to first request analgesia, 24hours opioid consumption, postoperative pain control, and associated side effects following use of intrathecal midazolam for lower limb surgeries. This review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and using the online databases, Medline, Science Direct, Google scholar and Cochrane library. We registered this review with the PROSPERO database (ID-CRD42022346361) in August 2022. A total of 10 randomised controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed patients receiving 1mg intrathecal midazolam showed significantly faster onset of sensory block (P=.001 [CI: −0.98, −0.31]). Duration of sensory and motor block were also significantly prolonged in intrathecal midazolam group (P<.00001 [CI: 18.08, 39.12], P=.002 [CI: 0.45, 2]). Intrathecal midazolam also increased the time to first request analgesia (P=.0003 [CI: 1.22, 4.14]). Pain scores at 4 and 12hours postoperatively were significantly lower in patients receiving intrathecal midazolam (P=.00001[CI: −1.20, −0.47] and P=0.05 [CI: −0.52, −0.01] respectively). In conclusion, the addition of intrathecal midazolam to local anesthetics in lower limb surgeries results in early onset of sensory and motor block. It also increases the duration of sensory and motor block. The time to first request analgesia is increased. VAS pain scores at 4 and 12hours postoperatively were also lower without any increased side effects.(AU)

Effect of ankle versus thigh tourniquets on post-operative pain in foot and ankle surgery.

BACKGROUND: Tourniquets are commonly used in elective extremity orthopaedic surgery to reduce blood loss, improve visualization in the surgical field, and to potentially reduce surgical time. There is a lack of consensus in existing guidelines regarding the optimal tourniquet pressure, placement site, and duration of use. There is a paucity of data on the relationship between the site of a tourniquet and postoperative pain in foot and ankle surgery. AIM: To explore the relationship between tourniquet site and intensity of post-operative pain scores in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 201 patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery in a single institution was undertaken. Intraoperative tourniquet duration, tourniquet pressure and site, and postoperative pain scores using Visual Analogue Score were collected in immediate recovery, at six hours and at 24 h post-op. Scatter plots were used to analyse the data and to assess for the statistical correlation between tourniquet pressure, duration, site, and pain scores using Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: All patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery had tourniquet pressure of 250 mmHg for ankle tourniquet and 300 mmHg for thigh. There was no correlation between the site of the tourniquet and pain scores in recovery, at six hours and after 24 h. There was a weak correlation between tourniquet time and Visual Analogue Score immediately post-op (r = 0.14, P = 0.04) but not at six or 24 h post-operatively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that there was no statistically significant correlation between tourniquet pressure, site and post-op pain in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. The choice of using a tourniquet is based on the surgeon's preference, with the goal of minimizing the duration of its application at the operative site.

Adding intrathecal midazolam to local anesthetics improves sensory and motor block and reduces pain score without increasing side effects in lower limb surgeries: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

This meta-analysis was done to investigate the role of intrathecal midazolam in lower limb surgeries regarding prolongation of spinal block, postoperative pain control and associated side effects. The included studies reported onset and duration of sensory and motor block, time to first request analgesia, 24h opioid consumption, postoperative pain control, and associated side effects following use of intrathecal midazolam for lower limb surgeries. This review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and using the online databases, Medline, Science Direct, Google scholar and Cochrane library. We registered this review with the PROSPERO database (ID-CRD42022346361) in August 2022. A total of 10 randomised controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed patients receiving 1mg intrathecal midazolam showed significantly faster onset of sensory block [P=.001 (CI: -0.98, -0.31)]. Duration of sensory and motor block were also significantly prolonged in intrathecal midazolam group [P<.00001 (CI: 18.08, 39.12), P=.002 (CI: 0.45, 2). Intrathecal midazolam also increased the time to first request analgesia [P=.0003, (CI: 1.22, 4.14)]. Pain scores at 4 and 12h postoperatively were significantly lower in patients receiving intrathecal midazolam [P=.00001 (CI: -1.20, -0.47) and P=.05 (CI: -0.52, -0.01) respectively]. In conclusion, the addition of intrathecal midazolam to local anesthetics in lower limb surgeries results in early onset of sensory and motor block. It also increases the duration of sensory and motor block. The time to first request analgesia is increased. VAS pain scores at 4 and 12h postoperatively were also lower without any increased side effects.

Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition System for Preventing Wrong-Site Upper Limb Surgery.

Our image recognition system employs a deep learning model to differentiate between the left and right upper limbs in images, allowing doctors to determine the correct surgical position. From the experimental results, it was found that the precision rate and the recall rate of the intelligent image recognition system for preventing wrong-site upper limb surgery proposed in this paper could reach 98% and 93%, respectively. The results proved that our Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition System (AIIRS) could indeed assist orthopedic surgeons in preventing the occurrence of wrong-site left and right upper limb surgery. At the same time, in future, we will apply for an IRB based on our prototype experimental results and we will conduct the second phase of human trials. The results of this research paper are of great benefit and research value to upper limb orthopedic surgery.

Optimal concentration of ropivacaine for brachial plexus blocks in adult patients undergoing upper limb surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim of the Study: Brachial plexus block (BPB) is widely used for patients undergoing upper limb surgeries. Ropivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for BPB. This study aimed to identify the optimal ropivacaine concentration for BPB in adult patients undergoing upper limb surgeries. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine for BPB in adult patients undergoing upper limb surgeries. The primary outcomes were the onset time of sensory and motor block. RevMan 5.4 software was used for analysis. The GRADE approach was used to assess evidence quality. Results: Nine studies involving 504 patients were included. Compared to 0.5% ropivacaine, 0.75% ropivacaine shortened the onset time of sensory (WMD, -2.54; 95% CI; -4.84 to -0.24; <0.0001, moderate quality of evidence) and motor blockade (WMD, -2.46; 95% CI, -4.26 to -0.66; p = 0.01; moderate quality of evidence). However, 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine provided similar duration time of sensory (WMD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.88 to 0.74; p = 0.81; high quality of evidence) and motor blockade (WMD, -0.24; 95% CI, -1.12 to 0.65; p = 0.55; high quality of evidence), as well as time to first request for oral analgesia (WMD, -1.57; 95% CI, -3.14 to 0.01; p = 0.5; moderate quality of evidence). Conclusion: Moderate-quality evidence suggested that, in terms of the onset time of sensory and motor blockade, 0.75% ropivacaine is a preferred concentration for BPB in upper limb surgeries. Systematic Review Registration: identifier CRD42023392145.

A Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Approaches to Brachial Plexus Block for Elective Upper Limb Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Regional anaesthesia offers the anaesthesiologist, the surgeon, as well as the patient advantages over general anaesthesia such as being conscious through the surgery, avoiding multiple drugs, better haemodynamic stability, excellent postoperative analgesia, and faster per oral consumption post surgery. Compared with the axillary approach, the brachial plexus block at the level of the clavicle can anaesthetize all four distal upper extremity nerve territories without the requirement for a separate block of the musculocutaneous nerve. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of both supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in terms of time taken for onset, performance, and block success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing below-elbow upper limb surgeries were randomized into two groups: (i) supraclavicular (Group S) and (ii) infraclavicular (Group I). All patients received 30ml 0f 0.5% bupivacaine as the local anesthetic of choice. The block performance time, time taken for onset of sensory and motor blockade, total duration of block, and hemodynamic parameters were observed. The block performance times and the onset of the sensory blockade were the primary outcomes while the duration of the block and hemodynamic parameters were secondary outcomes. Two two-tailed independent sample t-tests will be used to compare the variables. RESULTS: We observed that the block performance time for the infraclavicular block (mean 14.833 minutes) was longer than the supraclavicular block (mean 10.37 minutes). This was statistically significant with p <0.001. In terms of onset of sensory blockade, the infraclavicular group (13.667 minutes) had a quicker onset compared to the supraclavicular group (17.333 minutes). This was also statistically significant with p <0.001. The mean total duration of sensory and motor blockade was similar in both groups (p-value of 0.341 and 0.791 respectively) and there was no statistical difference. There was no hemodynamic instability or complications in our study. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block is a relatively safer technique when compared to the supraclavicular technique with faster onset. The time taken for administering the infraclavicular block can be reduced by repeated exposure to the technique.

Functional recovery of wrist surgery with regional versus general anesthesia: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Regional anesthesia may favour postoperative rehabilitation by inhibiting peripheral sensitization and secondary hyperalgesia. The literature on this subject is limited. In the present FUNCTION study, we sought to compare the functional recovery post orthopedic wrist surgery with regional versus general anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre prospective observational cohort study in adult patients with a distal radial fracture. Functional recovery was assessed with validated psychometrics questionnaires (Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH] and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation [PRWE]), range of motion, and grip strength. We used a linear mixed regression model to assess the impact of the anesthesia technique on functional recovery. Postoperative pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: We recruited 76 patients. At 12 weeks post surgery, there was no difference between the type of anesthesia and functional recovery with the QuickDASH (higher scores worse; regional anesthesia [RA], 22.7 vs general anesthesia [GA], 19.3; adjusted mean difference [aMD], -0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.6 to 9.0; P = 0.9) and PRWE (higher scores worse; RA group, 21.0 vs GA group, 20.5; aMD, -3.3; 95% CI, -12.1 to 5.6; P = 0.93) questionnaires. Range of motion, satisfaction, and postoperative pain were similar between groups. Right-hand grip strength was higher in the GA group. CONCLUSION: Regional anesthesia was not associated with improved functional recovery compared with general anesthesia. The dominance of the operated limb was a confusion factor in all evaluation modalities. Further research taking into account the dominance of the hand is necessary to establish the effects of regional anesthesia on functional recovery. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04541745); registered 9 September 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'anesthésie régionale pourrait favoriser la rééducation postopératoire en inhibant la sensibilisation périphérique et l'hyperalgésie secondaire. La littérature à ce sujet est limitée. Dans la présente étude nommée FUNCTION, nous avons cherché à comparer la récupération fonctionnelle après une chirurgie orthopédique du poignet réalisée sous anesthésie régionale vs sous anesthésie générale. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte observationnelle prospective monocentrique auprès de patient·es adultes présentant une fracture radiale distale. La récupération fonctionnelle a été évaluée à l'aide de questionnaires psychométriques validés (questionnaires QuickDASH [Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand] et PRWE [Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation]), de l'amplitude des mouvements et de la force de préhension. Nous avons utilisé un modèle de régression linéaire mixte pour évaluer l'impact de la technique d'anesthésie sur la récupération fonctionnelle. La douleur postopératoire et la satisfaction des patient·es ont été évaluées à l'aide d'une échelle visuelle analogique. RéSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 76 personnes. Douze semaines après la chirurgie, il n'y avait aucune différence entre le type d'anesthésie et la récupération fonctionnelle selon le questionnaire QuickDASH (scores plus élevés les pires; anesthésie régionale [AR], 22,7 vs anesthésie générale [AG], 19,3; différence moyenne ajustée [DMa], −0,3; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, −9,6 à 9,0; P = 0,9) et PRWE (scores plus élevés les pires; groupe AR, 21,0 vs groupe AG, 20,5; DMa, −3,3; IC 95 %, −12,1 à 5,6; P = 0,93). L'amplitude des mouvements, la satisfaction et la douleur postopératoire étaient similaires entre les groupes. La force de préhension de la main droite était plus élevée dans le groupe AG. CONCLUSION: L'anesthésie régionale n'a pas été associée à une amélioration de la récupération fonctionnelle par rapport à l'anesthésie générale. La prédominance du membre opéré était un facteur de confusion dans toutes les modalités d'évaluation. D'autres recherches tenant compte du côté dominant au niveau des mains sont nécessaires pour déterminer les effets de l'anesthésie régionale sur la récupération fonctionnelle. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04541745); enregistrée le 9 septembre 2020.

Ultrasound-guided Retroclavicular Approach Versus Costoclavicular Approach of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia for an upper limb provides many advantages over general anesthesia, especially in orthopedic surgery. OBJECTIVES: This trial aimed to compare a retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus with a costoclavicular approach in term of needle time, image time, and procedure time, and comparing both with the classic technique for upper limb surgeries guided by ultrasound. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. SETTING: Minia University, Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department. METHODS: Sixty patients of both sees with an American Society of Anesthesiologists  Classification of I and II, a BMI (kg/m2) of 20-35, aged from 18-60 years who were scheduled for a forearm or hand surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block were divided into 3 parallel equal groups. Group I (RC) received a retroclavicular approach.  Group II (CC)received a costoclavicular approach.  Group III (CT) received the classic technique. Procedure time, the sum of the imaging and needling times, was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the motor and sensory block success rate 30 minutes postinjection of local anesthesia, duration of motor and sensory block, Visual Analog Score, first analgesic need, total analgesia requirements during the first postoperative 24 hours, and any complications. RESULTS: The procedure and needle times were significantly decreased in the retroclavicular group due to better needle visibility. There was no significant difference regarding sensory and motor block data. The VAS score in the first postoperative 24 hours showed no statistical significance. Regarding analgesic data and patient satisfaction, there was no statistical significance among the 3 studied groups. There were no complications in any of the used approaches. LIMITATION: Our trial did not include patients with a BMI > 35. CONCLUSIONS: The retroclavicular approach is superior because of its decreased procedure time and needle time than both the costoclavicular approach and classic approach.

Widening Access: Sterile Tourniquets for Surgery to the Distal Humerus.

Purpose of the study The use of tourniquets during surgery of the distal humerus can improve visibility and reduce surgical time. However, the available operating field can be limited due to the size and placement of the tourniquet. This proof-of-concept study aimed to determine if sterile tourniquets can provide a wider surgical field compared to non-sterile tourniquets for procedures around the distal humerus. Methods Volunteers (n = 5) were positioned to simulate access to the distal humerus. The distance from the posterior corner of the acromion to the tip of the olecranon was measured. Participants were draped according to the standard protocol for the use of a non-sterile or sterile tourniquet for distal humerus and humeral shaft fractures. Two non-sterile pneumatic tourniquets (standard and narrow) and two sterile tourniquets (pneumatic and elastic exsanguination) were tested. The surgical field was measured from the sterile drape or tourniquet proximally to the tip of the olecranon. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to examine the effect of each tourniquet on the surgical field. Results The sterile elastic exsanguination tourniquet had the largest available field with a mean of 24.4 cm (71% of arm available for incision after application), followed by the sterile pneumatic tourniquet of 20.0 cm (58%), narrow non-sterile pneumatic of 19.2 cm (55%), and standard non-sterile pneumatic of 17.0 cm (49%). Repeated measures ANOVA determined that mean surgical field length is statistically significant between tourniquet devices (F (1.729, 6.914) = 21.783, p = .001). The surgical field length was statistically significantly increased from a non-sterile standard tourniquet to a sterile elastic tourniquet (7.4 (95% CI, 2.9-11.9) cm, p = .008) but not the other two tourniquet devices tested. Conclusion The use of certain types of sterile tourniquets can provide a wider surgical field compared to non-sterile tourniquets for procedures around the distal humerus, specifically the sterile elastic exsanguination tourniquet providing a statistically significant mean gain of 7.4 cm from the non-sterile tourniquets. These findings suggest that the use of sterile tourniquets should be considered more frequently in surgery of the distal humerus, and a sterile exsanguinating tourniquet could be considered for midshaft humeral fractures, facilitating safer exposure of the radial nerve and reduced blood loss.

Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability.

Background. While nerve and tendon transfer surgery can restore upper extremity function and independence after midcervical spinal cord injury, few individuals (∼14%) undergo surgery. There is limited information regarding these complex and time-sensitive treatment options. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) convey complex health information and help individuals make informed, preference-consistent choices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a newly created PtDA for people with spinal cord injury who are considering options to optimize upper extremity function. Methods. The PtDA was developed by our multidisciplinary group based on clinical evidence and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A prospective pilot study enrolled adults with midcervical spinal cord injury to evaluate the PtDA. Participants completed surveys about knowledge and decisional conflict before and after viewing the PtDA. Acceptability measures and suggestions for further improvement were also solicited. Results. Forty-two individuals were enrolled and completed study procedures. Participants had a 20% increase in knowledge after using the PtDA (P < 0.001). The number of participants experiencing decisional conflict decreased after viewing the PtDA (33 v. 18, P = 0.001). Acceptability was high. To improve the PtDA, participants suggested adding details about specific surgeries and outcomes. Limitations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we used an entirely virtual study methodology and recruited participants from national networks and organizations. Most participants were older than the general population with a new spinal cord injury and may have different injury causes than typical surgical candidates. Conclusions. A de novo PtDA improved knowledge of treatment options and reduced decisional conflict about reconstructive surgery among people with cervical spinal cord injury. Future work should explore PtDA use for improving knowledge and decisional conflict in the nonresearch, clinical setting. Highlights: People with cervical spinal cord injury prioritize gaining upper extremity function after injury, but few individuals receive information about treatment options.A newly created patient decision aid (PtDA) provides information about recovery after spinal cord injury and the role of traditional tendon and newer nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity upper extremity function.The PtDA improved knowledge and decreased decisional conflict in this pilot study.Future work should focus on studying dissemination and implementation of the ptDA into clinical practice.

Uncommon configuration of intercostobrachial nerves, lateral roots, and absent medial cutaneous nerve of arm in a cadaveric study.

The intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) originates from the second intercostal nerve's lateral cutaneous branch, while the median nerve (MN) typically arises from the brachial plexus's lateral and medial roots. The medial cutaneous nerve of the arm, a branch of the medial cord of the brachial plexus, often connects with the ICBN. Variations were observed during the dissection of a 50-year-old male cadaver, including MN having two lateral roots (LR), LR1 and LR2, joining at different levels. Three ICBNs innervated the arm in this case, with the absence of the medial cutaneous nerve of the arm compensated by branches from the medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm. Understanding these anatomical variations is crucial for surgical procedures like brachioplasty, breast augmentation, axillary lymph node dissection, and orthopedic surgery. Surgeons and medical professionals must be aware of these variations to enhance preoperative planning, minimize complications, and improve patient outcomes in these procedures.

Beyond the Brachial Plexus: Reapplication of the Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Upper Arm Fistula Surgery.

Patients requiring complex upper arm arteriovenous fistulas or grafts may not be suitable candidates for a single regional anesthesia technique and monitored anesthesia care because the necessary thoracic (T2) dermatomal area of the medial, upper arm remains spared by any solitary brachial plexus (C5-T1) technique. An infiltrative intercostobrachial nerve block can often be used in conjunction with a brachial plexus block; however, coverage may still be incomplete. This case report describes the use of a high thoracic paravertebral block in conjunction with a brachial plexus block to achieve adequate anesthetic coverage for an upper arm arteriovenous fistula creation procedure extending into the axilla. The result of this technique showed adequate coverage of the upper arm and demonstrates that paravertebral blocks are a reasonable adjunct for proximal upper arm arteriovenous fistula procedures.

A Unique Presentation of the Glenoid, Coracoid, and Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Fractures of the proximal humerus are common injuries with a bimodal age distribution. They usually present in younger patients after high-energy trauma and in elderly patients after lower-energy trauma. Fractures of the proximal humerus are rarely associated with concomitant fractures of the glenoid, and this is a complex injury pattern that indicates the presence of significant instability. Such injuries are usually treated surgically. Even more rarely, patients may present with proximal humerus fractures and fractures of the coracoid process. A male patient presented to our emergency department (ED) after a fall off the loading platform of his heavy goods vehicle (HGV), resulting in a right shoulder injury. During his initial assessment in ED, a computerised tomography (CT) scan demonstrated the presence of a comminuted proximal humerus fracture, a comminuted anterior glenoid wall fracture, and a coracoid process displaced fracture. Surgical fixation of all three fractures was undertaken in the same sitting. This is the first case described in the literature with a combination of the above injuries and serves as a reminder that as trauma complexity and incidence continue to increase, we should maintain a high index of diagnostic suspicion when dealing with such patients. Furthermore, we present our treatment approach for this case and the rationale behind it.