Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate-exposition in male rats during the peripubertal period impairs inflammatory mechanisms, antioxidant activity, and apoptosis process in kidneys of male pubertal rats.

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug of dextroamphetamine, which has been widely recommended for the treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). There are still no data in the literature relating the possible toxic effects of LDX in the kidney. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the effects of LDX exposure on morphological, oxidative stress, cell death and inflammation parameters in the kidneys of male pubertal Wistar rats, since the kidneys are organs related to the excretion of most drugs. For this, twenty male Wistar rats were distributed randomly into two experimental groups: LDX group-received 11,3 mg/kg/day of LDX; and Control group-received tap water. Animals were treated by gavage from postnatal day (PND) 25 to 65. At PND 66, plasma was collected to the biochemical dosage, and the kidneys were collected for determinations of the inflammatory profile, oxidative status, cell death, and for histochemical, and morphometric analyses. Our results show that there was an increase in the number of cells marked for cell death, and a reduction of proximal and distal convoluted tubules mean diameter in the group that received LDX. In addition, our results also showed an increase in MPO and NAG activity, indicating an inflammatory response. The oxidative status showed that the antioxidant system is working undisrupted and avoiding oxidative stress. Therefore, LDX-exposition in male rats during the peripubertal period causes renal changes in pubertal age involving inflammatory mechanisms, antioxidant activity and apoptosis process.

Can exposure to lisdexamfetamine dimesylate from juvenile period to peripubertal compromise male reproductive parameters in adult rats?

Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a d-amphetamine prodrug used to treat attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children and adolescents. Due to its action mediated by elevated levels of catecholamines, mainly dopamine and noradrenaline, which influence hormonal regulation and directly affect the gonads, this drug may potentially disrupt reproductive performance. This study evaluated the effects of exposure to LDX from the juvenile to peripubertal period (critical stages of development) on systemic and reproductive toxicity parameters in male rats. Male Wistar rats (23 days old) were treated with 0; 5.2; 8.6 or 12.1 mg/kg/day of LDX from post-natal day (PND) 23 to 53, by gavage. LDX treatment led to reduced daily food and water consumption, as well as a decrease in social behaviors. The day of preputial separation remained unaltered, although the treated animals exhibited reduced weight. At PND 54, the treated animals presented signs of systemic toxicity, evidenced by a reduction in body weight gain, increase in the relative weight of the liver, spleen, and seminal gland, reduction in erythrocyte and leukocyte counts, reduced total protein levels, and disruptions in oxidative parameters. In adulthood, there was an increase in immobile sperm, reduced sperm count, morphometric changes in the testis, and altered oxidative parameters, without compromising male sexual behavior and fertility. These findings showed that LDX-treatment during the juvenile and peripubertal periods induced immediate systemic toxicity and adversely influenced reproductive function in adult life, indicating that caution is necessary when prescribing this drug during the peripubertal phase.

Andrographolide blocks 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations, hyperlocomotion and oxidative stress in an animal model of mania.

In rats, lisdexamfetamine (LDX) induces manic-like behaviors such as hyperlocomotion and increases in appetitive 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USV), which are prevented by antimanic drugs, such as lithium. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3ß) and antioxidant activity have been associated with antimanic effects. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible antimanic-like effects of andrographolide (ANDRO), a GSK3ß inhibitor, on LDX-induced hyperlocomotion and 50-kHz USV increases. In addition, the effect of ANDRO was studied on LDX-induced oxidative stress. Lithium was used as positive control. Adult Wistar rats were treated with vehicle, lithium (100 mg/kg i.p., daily) or ANDRO (2 mg/kg i.p., 3 times a week) for 21 days. On the test day, either 10 mg/kg LDX or saline was administered i.p. and USV and locomotor activity were recorded. LDX administration increased the number of 50-kHz calls, as well as locomotor activity. Repeated treatment with lithium or ANDRO prevented these effects of LDX on 50-kHz USV and locomotor activity. LDX increased lipid peroxidation (LPO) levels in rat striatum and both lithium and ANDRO prevented this effect. LPO levels in rat striatum were positively correlated with increases in 50-kHz USV emission as well as hyperlocomotion. In conclusion, the present results indicate that ANDRO has antimanic-like effects, which may be mediated by its antioxidant properties.

Lisdexamfetamine and amphetamine pharmacokinetics in oral fluid, plasma, and urine after controlled oral administration of lisdexamfetamine.

Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a long-acting prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and binge-eating disorder (BED) symptoms. In vivo hydrolysis of the LDX amide bond releases the therapeutically active d-amphetamine (d-AMPH). This study aims to describe the pharmacokinetics of LDX and its major metabolite d-AMPH in human oral fluid, urine and plasma after a single 70 mg oral dose of LDX dimesylate. Six volunteers participated in the study. Oral fluid and blood samples were collected for up to 72 h and urine for up to 120 h post-drug administration for the pharmacokinetic evaluation of intact LDX and d-AMPH. Samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Regarding noncompartmental analysis, d-AMPH reached the maximum concentration at 3.8 and 4 h post-administration in plasma and oral fluid, respectively, with a mean peak concentration value almost six-fold higher in oral fluid. LDX reached maximum concentration at 1.2 and 1.8 h post-administration in plasma and oral fluid, respectively, with a mean peak concentration value almost three-fold higher in plasma. Intact LDX and d-AMPH were detected in the three matrices. The best fit of compartmental analysis was found in the one-compartment model for both analytes in plasma and oral fluid. There was a correlation between oral fluid and plasma d-AMPH concentrations and between parent to metabolite concentration ratios over time in plasma as well as in oral fluid.

Trastorno por déficit de atención con o sin hiperactividad aislado en consulta de Neuropediatría. Serie de casos / Isolated attention deficit disorder with/without hyperactivity in clinical practice. Series of cases

El trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad afecta al 5 % de los niños en edad escolar. Se presenta una serie de 82 niños con este trastorno no asociado a enfermedades neurológicas ni a discapacidad intelectual o trastorno del espectro autista, atendidos durante un período de 8 meses en Neuropediatría: 57 casos de tipo combinado, 23 de tipo inatento y 2 de predominio hiperactivo. Tiempo medio de seguimiento: 7 ± 2,8 años (rango: 4-14,6). Compartían seguimiento con Psiquiatría 16 pacientes. Nunca recibieron tratamiento por decisión parental 12 pacientes. De los 70 que recibieron, en 20, hubo demora en el inicio del tratamiento. Tiempo medio de demora: 20 meses ± 1,6 años (rango: 1 mes y 6 años). Tiempo medio de tratamiento: 44 meses ± 2,6 años (rango: 1 mes y 10,5 años). El 90 % de los pacientes (63) que iniciaron tratamiento continuaban tomándolo en la última revisión

Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity has a high prevalence affecting 5 % of school-age children. We present a case series of 82 children with said disorder not associated with neurological diseases or intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder, treated during a period of 8 months in a neuropediatrics clinic: 57 cases of combined type, 23 of inattentive type and 2 of overactive predominance. Average follow-up time: 7 ± 2.8 years (range: 4-14.6); 16 patients shared follow-up with Psychiatry; 12 patients never received treatment by parental decision. Of the 70 who received it, in 20 there was a delay in the start of treatment. Average delay time: 20 months ± 1.6 years (range: 1 month and 6 years). Average treatment time: 44 months ± 2.6 years (range: 1 month and 10.5 years); 90 % of the patients (63) who started treatment were under treatment at the last control

[Isolated attention deficit disorder with/without hyperactivity in clinical practice. Series of cases]. / Trastorno por déficit de atención con o sin hiperactividad aislado en consulta de Neuropediatría. Serie de casos.

Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity has a high prevalence affecting 5 % of school-age children. We present a case series of 82 children with said disorder not associated with neurological diseases or intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder, treated during a period of 8 months in a neuropediatrics clinic: 57 cases of combined type, 23 of inattentive type and 2 of overactive predominance. Average follow-up time: 7 ± 2.8 years (range: 4-14.6); 16 patients shared follow-up with Psychiatry; 12 patients never received treatment by parental decision. Of the 70 who received it, in 20 there was a delay in the start of treatment. Average delay time: 20 months ±1.6 years (range: 1 month and 6 years). Average treatment time: 44 months ± 2.6 years (range: 1 month and 10.5 years); 90 % of the patients (63) who started treatment were under treatment at the last control.

El trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad afecta al 5 % de los niños en edad escolar. Se presenta una serie de 82 niños con este trastorno no asociado a enfermedades neurológicas ni a discapacidad intelectual o trastorno del espectro autista, atendidos durante un período de 8 meses en Neuropediatría: 57 casos de tipo combinado, 23 de tipo inatento y 2 de predominio hiperactivo. Tiempo medio de seguimiento: 7 ± 2,8 años (rango: 4-14,6). Compartían seguimiento con Psiquiatría 16 pacientes. Nunca recibieron tratamiento por decisión parental 12 pacientes. De los 70 que recibieron, en 20, hubo demora en el inicio del tratamiento. Tiempo medio de demora: 20 meses ± 1,6 años (rango: 1 mes y 6 años). Tiempo medio de tratamiento: 44 meses ± 2,6 años (rango: 1 mes y 10,5 años). El 90 % de los pacientes (63) que iniciaron tratamiento continuaban tomándolo en la última revisión.

Lisdexamfetamine Alters BOLD-fMRI Activations Induced by Odor Cues in Impulsive Children.

INTRODUCTION: Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a drug used to treat ADHD/impulsive patients. Impulsivity is known to affect inhibitory, emotional and cognitive function. On the other hand, smell and odor processing are known to be affected by neurological disorders, as they are modulators of addictive and impulsive behaviors specifically. We hypothesize that, after LDX ingestion, inhibitory pathways of the brain would change, and complementary behavioral regulation mechanisms would appear to regulate decision-making and impulsivity. METHODS: 20 children were studied in an aleatory crossover study. Imaging of BOLD-fMRI activity, elicited by olfactory stimulation in impulsive children, was performed after either LDX or placebo ingestion. RESULTS: Findings showed that all subjects who underwent odor stimulation presented activations of similar intensities in the olfactory centers of the brain. This contrasted with inhibitory regions of the brain such as the cingulate cortex and frontal lobe regions, which demonstrated changed activity patterns and intensities. While some differences between the placebo and medicated states were found in motor areas, precuneus, cuneus, calcarine, supramarginal, cerebellum and posterior cingulate cortex, the main changes were found in frontal, temporal and parietal cortices. When comparing olfactory cues separately, pleasant food smells like chocolate seemed not to present large differences between the medicated and placebo scenarios, when compared to non-food-related smells. CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that LDX, first, altered the inhibitory pathways of the brain, secondly it increased activity in several brain regions which were not activated by smell in drug-naïve patients, and thirdly, it facilitated a complementary behavioral regulation mechanism, run by the cerebellum, which regulated decision-making and impulsivity in motor and frontal structures.

Lisdexamfetamine to improve excessive daytime sleepiness and weight management in narcolepsy: a case series

Objective: To report the successful use of lisdexamfetamine in the management of narcolepsy. Methods: Five narcoleptic patients received lisdexamfetamine, at different dosages and for different periods, for management of excessive daytime sleepiness and weight control. Results: All patients experienced improvement of excessive daytime sleepiness and lost weight without side effects. Conclusion: Lisdexamfetamine appears promising for the treatment of two of the most common symptoms of narcolepsy: excessive daytime sleepiness and weight gain.

Effects of lithium on inflammatory and neurotrophic factors after an immune challenge in a lisdexamfetamine animal model of mania

Objective: To evaluate whether an animal model of mania induced by lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) has an inflammatory profile and whether immune activation by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) has a cumulative effect on subsequent stimuli in this model. We also evaluated the action of lithium (Li) on inflammatory and neurotrophic factors. Methods: Adult male Wistar rats were subjected to an animal model of mania. After the open-field test, they were given LPS to induce systemic immune activation. Subsequently, the animals' blood was collected, and their serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1β, IL-10, and inducible nitric oxide synthase [iNOS]) were measured. Results: LDX induced hyperactivity in the animals, but no inflammatory marker levels increased except brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Li had no effect on serum BDNF levels but prevented iNOS levels from increasing in animals subjected to immune activation. Conclusion: Although Li prevented an LPS-induced increase in serum iNOS levels, its potential anti-inflammatory effects in this animal model of mania were conflicting.

Assessment of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate stability and identification of its degradation product by NMR spectroscopy.

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a long-acting prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), was subjected to forced degradation studies by acid and alkaline hydrolysis and the degradation profile was studied. To obtain between 10-30% of degraded product, acid and alkaline conditions were assessed with solutions of 0.01 M, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, and 1 M of DCl and NaOD. These solutions were analyzed through 1 H NMR spectra. Acid hydrolysis produced no degradation in 0.01 M and 0.1 M DCl and 4.38%, 9.69%, and 17.75% of degradation LDX, respectively, in 0.5 M, 1 M (4h) and 1 M (4 + 12 h) DCl. And alkaline hydrolysis produced no degradation in 0.01 M and 0.1 M DCl and a degradation LDX extension of 8.5%, 14.30%, and 22.91%, respectively, in 0.5 M, 1 M (4h) and 1 M (4 + 12 h) NaOD. LDX solutions subjected to 1 M (4 + 12 h) acid and alkaline hydrolysis were evaluated by NMR spectra (1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, HSQC and HMBC). LDX degradation product (DP) was identified and its structure elucidated as a diastereoisomer of LDX: (2R)-2,6-diamino-N-[(2S)-1-phenylpropan-2-yl] hexanamide without their physical separation.

Evaluation of the response of lisdexamfetamine in children and adolescents with ADHD: quasi-experimental study / Evaluación de la respuesta de la lisdexanfetamina en niños y adolescentes con TDAH: estudio cuasiexperimental

Abstract Introduction Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders. Although lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) offers a treatment alternative, clinical evidence of LDX for ADHD has not been explored in Latin American pediatric population. Objective To evaluate the LDX response in Mexican pediatric patients with ADHD. Method We designed a quasi-experimental, uncontrolled before and after study to evaluate the LDX response in patients with severe ADHD. We established a diagnosis of ADHD according to DSM-5 criteria. We formed three groups: without previous treatment (group A), in treatment with stimulant drugs (group B) or in treatment with non-stimulant drugs (group C). Prior to the start of the study, letters of consent and informed consent were signed. We evaluated the effect of LDX based on the difference between ADHD-RS scores at the beginning and after six months. Results We recruited a total of 144 patients (group A: 48 patients, group B: 57 patients, group C: 39 patients). All the groups showed a significant decrease in the mean score of ADHD-RS (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale) at six months (group A 37.57 vs. 22.34, p <.01), (group B 36.72 vs. 24.45; p <. 01), (group C 38.54 vs. 24.3, p <.01). Fewer than 30% of the subjects showed a significant adverse reaction, the most frequent ones being: sleep disturbance (primary insomnia) 24% and decreased appetite in 20%. Discussion and conclusion Treatment with LDX is an effective, well-tolerated pharmacological option for Mexican pediatric patients with ADHD.

Resumen Introducción El trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH) es uno de los trastornos del neurodesarrollo más comunes. Aunque el dimesilato de lisdexanfetamina (LDX) ofrece una alternativa de tratamiento, la evidencia clínica de LDX para TDAH no se ha explorado en población pediátrica latinoamericana. Objetivo Evaluar la respuesta de LDX en pacientes pediátricos mexicanos con TDAH. Método Diseñamos un estudio cuasiexperimental no controlado de antes y después para evaluar la respuesta de LDX en pacientes con TDAH grave. Establecimos el diagnóstico de TDAH de acuerdo con criterios del DSM-5. Conformamos tres grupos: sin tratamiento previo (grupo A), en tratamiento con fármacos estimulantes (grupo B) o en tratamiento con fármacos no estimulantes (grupo C). Previo al inicio del estudio se firmaron las cartas de consentimiento y asentimiento informado. Evaluamos el efecto de LDX con base en la diferencia de los puntajes de ADHD-RS al inicio y posterior a seis meses. Resultados Reclutamos un total de 144 pacientes (grupo A: 48 pacientes, grupo B: 57 pacientes, grupo C: 39 pacientes). Todos los grupos mostraron una disminución significativa en la media de puntaje de ADHD-RS (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale) a los seis meses (grupo A 37.57 vs. 22.34; p < .01), (grupo B 36.72 vs. 24.45; p < .01), (grupo C 38.54 vs. 24.3; p < .01). Menos del 30% de los sujetos presentó alguna reacción adversa importante, siendo las más frecuentes: alteraciones del sueño (insomnio primario) 24% y disminución del apetito en 20%. Discusión y conclusión El tratamiento con LDX es una opción farmacológica efectiva y bien tolerada para pacientes pediátricos mexicanos con TDAH.

Method validation and determination of lisdexamfetamine and amphetamine in oral fluid, plasma and urine by LC-MS/MS.

Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a long-acting prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and binge-eating disorder symptoms. In vivo hydrolysis of LDX amide bond releases the therapeutically active d-amphetamine (d-AMPH). Since toxicological tests in biological samples can detect AMPH from the use of some legal medications, efficient methods are needed in order to correctly interpret the results. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of LDX and its main biotransformation product AMPH in human oral fluid, plasma and urine. Calibration curve range for both analytes was 1-128 ng/mL in oral fluid and plasma and 4-256 ng/mL in urine, being the lowest concentration the limit of quantification. Accuracy of the determined values of the target analytes for the five control levels ranged from 94.8 to 111.7% for oral fluid, from 91.3 to 100.2% for plasma and from 94.8 to 109.8% for urine. Imprecision for the five control levels did not exceeded 12.8% for oral fluid, 16.2% for plasma and 17.1% for urine. The method developed for the three matrices was validated and was also successfully applied to assess real samples, showing for the first time the detection of LDX in oral fluid.

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety in children and adolescents / Dimesilato de lisdexanfetamina no tratamento do transtorno do déficit de atenção e hiperatividade: farmacocinética, eficácia e segurança em crianças e adolescentes

Background: Psychostimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamines) are considered first-line therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a new psychostimulant approved for the treatment of ADHD in Brazil. The pharmacologically active fraction, d-amphetamine, is gradually released by hydrolysis of the LDX prodrug. Objectives: To perform a systematic review of the literature of the efficacy and safety of LDX in the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. Methods: Medline/PubMed searches for “d-amfetamine”, “lisdexamfetamine” and “lisdexamfetamine dimesylate” were conducted including articles available from January 2000 to November 2013. Additional references were identified using references listed in those articles. Further data on LDX were requested from its manufacturer. Results: Thirty-one papers were found related to ADHD treatment in children and adolescents. Discussion: The therapeutic benefits of LDX in children with ADHD are achieved as early as 1.5 hours after its administration and last for up to 13 hours, with efficacy comparable or superior to that of other available psychostimulants. The literature also reports efficacy in long-term treatment, with safety and tolerability profiles comparable to those of other stimulants used for the treatment of ADHD. Most of the adverse events associated with LDX are considered to be mild or moderate in severity, with the most common being loss of appetite and insomnia...

Contexto: Psicoestimulantes (metilfenidato e anfetaminas) são considerados como tratamento farmacológico de primeira linha no tratamento do transtorno do déficit de atenção e hiperatividade (TDAH). O dimesilato de anfetamina é um novo psicoestimulante aprovado para uso no Brasil, cuja fração farmacologicamente ativa, a d-anfetamina, é gradualmente liberada por hidrólise da pró-droga. Objetivos Realizar uma revisão sistemática de literatura sobre eficácia e segurança da LDX no tratamento de TDAH de crianças e adolescentes. Métodos: Busca na base Medline/PubMed com os termos “d-amfetamine”, “lisdexamfetamine” e “lisdexamfetamine dimesilate”, de janeiro de 2000 até novembro de 2013. Referências adicionais foram retiradas das referências dos artigos obtidos; dados também foram obtidos do fabricante. Resultados: Trinta e um artigos foram encontrados, relacionados ao tratamento de TDAH em crianças e adolescentes. Conclusões: Os benefícios terapêuticos da LDX são obtidos em até 1,5 hora após administração e se estendem até 13 horas, com eficácia comparável ou superior à dos demais psicoestimulantes disponíveis. A literatura também documenta eficácia em longo prazo, com perfis de segurança e tolerabilidade comparáveis aos dos demais estimulantes usados no tratamento do TDAH. A maioria dos eventos adversos associados à LDX é considerada leve ou moderada quanto à gravidade, sendo os eventos mais comuns perda de apetite e insônia...

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover trial to examine the pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in healthy older adults.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic and safety data on stimulants in older adults are limited. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a d-amphetamine prodrug, in older adults. METHODS: In this two-period crossover trial, healthy adults (n = 47) stratified by age (55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years) and gender received randomized, double-blind, single doses of LDX 50 mg or placebo. Baseline creatinine clearance, d-amphetamine and intact LDX pharmacokinetics, and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Mean (±standard deviation) baseline creatinine clearance in participants aged 55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years was 102.5 ± 26.1, 105.3 ± 23.1, and 94.9 ± 27.3 mL per minute, respectively. In the groups aged 55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years, the mean maximum plasma d-amphetamine concentration in men was 44.2 ± 11.1, 47.7 ± 7.0, and 53.4 ± 19.4 ng/mL, respectively; area under the concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-inf)) was 915.0 ± 164.9, 1123.0 ± 227.0, and 1325.0 ± 464.4 nghour/mL; median time to reach peak plasma concentration was 4.5, 3.5, and 5.5 hours; in women, mean maximum plasma d-amphetamine concentration was 51.0 ± 6.7, 50.2 ± 6.8, and 64.3 ± 12.1 ng/mL, AUC(0-inf) was 1034.5 ± 154.6, 988.4 ± 80.5, and 1347.8 ± 198.9 ng hour/mL, and median time to reach peak plasma concentration was 3.5, 4.1, and 5.5 hours, respectively. d-Amphetamine clearance was unrelated to baseline creatinine clearance. Five participants aged 55-64 years reported treatment-emergent adverse events (versus one each aged 65-74 and ≥ 75 years), and as did six women (versus one man). No trends in blood pressure or pulse changes were seen with LDX according to age. In participants aged 55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years, the mean change from time-matched baseline pulse ranged from -5.0 to 14.7, -4.3 to 9.5, and -3.0 to 14.7 beats per minute; for systolic blood pressure, from -3.9 to 18.5 mmHg, -2.1 to 14.5 mmHg, and -5.9 to 16.0 mmHg; for diastolic blood pressure from -2.5 to 8.3 mmHg, from -0.8 to 9.4 mmHg, and -0.6 to 9.5 mmHg. Vital sign changes were similar between men and women. CONCLUSION: Clearance of d-amphetamine decreased with age and was unrelated to creatinine clearance. No trends in pulse or blood pressure changes with LDX were seen according to age. The safety profile of LDX was consistent with prior observations in younger adult study participants.