Case report: A case of unilateral combined central retinal vein occlusion, incomplete central retinal artery occlusion, and papillitis following a third dose of COVID-19 vaccination.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present a case of severe visual loss due to retinal arteriovenous occlusion and papillitis in one eye following vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: A 45-year-old man undergoing treatment for hypertension had severely reduced visual acuity in the right eye 1 day after receiving a third dose of a COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by Moderna. Clinical examination showed that the best-corrected visual acuity in the right eye was counting fingers. Other findings included circumferential retinal hemorrhage, perimacular ischemic color, severe macular edema, and severe optic disc swelling, indicating the presence of central retinal vein occlusion, incomplete central retinal artery occlusion, and papillitis. Based on the possibility of post-vaccination inflammation and/or abnormal immune response, three courses of steroid pulse therapy were administered, and the visual acuity slightly improved to 20/1,000. Results: Three months after the onset of symptoms, macular edema disappeared; conversely, retinal thinning of the macula and extensive non-perfusion areas mainly on the nasal side were noted. Conclusion: The findings in this case suggest that inflammation and abnormal immune response after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination may lead to combined retinal arteriovenous occlusion and papillitis.

Aflibercept or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the primary substance involved in retinal barrier breach. VEGF overexpression may cause diabetic macular edema (DME). Laser photocoagulation of the macula is the standard treatment for DME; however, recently, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have surpassed laser treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of aflibercept or ranibizumab for managing treatment-naive DME. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, interventional, comparative study included eyes with visual impairment due to treatment-naive DME that underwent intravitreal injection of either aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL or ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 mL at Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt between March 2023 and January 2024. Demographic data and full ophthalmological examination results at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months post-injection were collected, including the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notation, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundoscopy, and central subfield thickness (CST) measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Results: Overall, the 96 eyes of 96 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 57 (10) (range: 20-74) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:2.7 were allocated to one of two groups with comparable age, sex, diabetes mellitus duration, and presence of other comorbidities (all P >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in baseline diabetic retinopathy status or DME type between groups (both P >0.05). In both groups, the median (IQR) BCDVA significantly improved from 0.7 (0.8) logMAR at baseline to 0.4 (0.1) logMAR at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). The median (IQR) CST significantly decreased in the aflibercept group from 347 (166) µm at baseline to 180 (233) µm at 6 months post-injection, and it decreased in the ranibizumab group from 360 (180) µm at baseline to 190 (224) µm at 6 months post-injection (both P = 0.001), with no statistically significant differences between groups at all follow-up visits (all P >0.05). No serious adverse effects were documented in either group. Conclusions: Ranibizumab and aflibercept were equally effective in achieving the desired anatomical and functional results in patients with treatment-naïve DME in short-term follow-up without significant differences in injection counts between both drugs. Larger prospective, randomized, double-blinded trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

A health economic pilot study comparing two diabetic retinopathy screening strategies.

To compare two screening strategies for diabetic retinopathy (DR), and to determine the health-economic impact of including optical coherence tomography (OCT) in a regular DR screening. This cross-sectional study included a cohort of patients (≥ 18 years) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus (T1D or T2D) from a pilot DR screening program at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. A combined screening strategy where OCT was performed in addition to fundus photography for all patients, was conducted on this cohort and compared to our existing sequential screening strategy. In the sequential screening strategy, OCT was performed on a separate day only if fundus photography indicated diabetic macular edema (DME). The presence of diabetic maculopathy on fundus photography and DME on OCT was determined by two medical retina specialists. Based on the prevalence rate of diabetic maculopathy and DME from the pilot, we determined the health-economic impact of the two screening strategies. The study included 180 eyes of 90 patients. Twenty-seven eyes of 18 patients had diabetic maculopathy, and of these, 7 eyes of 6 patients revealed DME on OCT. When diabetic maculopathy was absent on fundus photographs, OCT could not reveal DME. Accordingly, 18 patients (20%) with diabetic maculopathy would have needed an additional examination with OCT in the sequential screening strategy, 6 (33%) of whom would have had DME on OCT. In an extended healthcare perspective analysis, the cost of the sequential screening strategy was higher than the cost of the combined screening strategy. There was a weak association between diabetic maculopathy on fundus photography and DME on OCT. The health economic analysis suggests that including OCT as a standard test in DR screening could potentially be cost-saving.

Anti-VEGF therapy for the long-term management of diabetic macular edema: a treat-to-target strategy based on macular morphology.

In an aging population, the prevalence and burden of diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and vision-threatening diabetic macular edema (DME) are only expected to rise around the world. Similarly to other complications of diabetes mellitus, DME requires long-term management. This article aims to review the current challenges associated with the long-term management of DME, opportunities to improve outcomes for patients, and to develop a treat-to-target strategy based on macular morphology. At present, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for the management of DME; however, best-achievable vision outcomes with treatment are reliant on frequent injections and close monitoring, which are difficult to maintain in current clinical practice because of the burden this imposes on patients. Achieving and maintaining good vision with treatment are the most important factors for patients with DME. Landmark trials have shown that vision gains with anti-VEGF therapy are typically accompanied by anatomical improvements (e.g., reductions in retinal thickness); therefore, multimodal imaging measures of macular morphology are often used in patients with DME to guide real-world treatment decisions. We would like to propose a hypothetical treat-to-target algorithm to guide physicians on treatment strategies for the long-term management of DME. Alternative measures of retinal fluid (e.g., persistence, stability, location) may be stronger predictors of visual acuity in DME, although further research is required to confirm whether alternate quantifiable biomarkers such as subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid volumes can be used as a biomarker of clinical improvement. Identifying novel biomarkers and treatments that target neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, improving patient-physician communication around treatment adherence, and using treat-to-target measures may help to ensure that the long-term benefits of treatment are realized.

A case of accidental into-the-lens dexamethasone implant: watching or removing?

BACKGROUND: To report a case of cataract surgery in unintentional Ozurdex (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California, USA) injection into the lens. CASE PRESENTATION: A 82-years old man reporting decreased visual acuity in his right eye came to our Ophthalmology service. Due to the clinical history, and on the basis of ophthalmoscopic and imaging examinations diabetic macular edema was diagnosed. Thus, intravitreal dexamethasone implant was scheduled and therefore performed. The following day Ozurdex appeared to be located into the lens. After careful evaluation and strict follow up examinations, due to the risks associated with the presence of the implant into the lens, phacoemulsification with Ozurdex removal and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was scheduled and performed. CONCLUSIONS: In this case report we reported the surgical management of accidental into-the lens dexamethasone implant carefully taking into account the dexamethasone pharmacokinetic.

Intravitreal Injection of Conbercept Combined with Dexamethasone for Macular Edema Following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Background: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injections of Conbercept combined with dexamethasone (DEX) for macular edema (ME) following central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods: This was a prospective, single-masked, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Patients with ME following CRVO were randomised into groups to receive intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg Conbercept plus 0.2 mg DEX or 0.5 mg Conbercept alone on day 0 followed by repeat injections as indicated. The primary outcome measure was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12. Secondary outcome measures included decrease in central retinal thickness (CRT), injection frequency and interval and percentage of patients who gained more than 15 ETDRS letters or achieved a CRT of < 250 µm at month 12. Results: 33 males (51%) and 32 females (49%) were initially recruited with an average age of 56.64 ± 13.88 years. Patients in the Conbercept and Conbercept + DEX groups gained an average of 14.55 ± 19.19 and 14.88 ± 17.68 ETDRS letters, respectively, at months 12 (t = 4.221, P = 0.000; and t = 4.834, P = 0.000) with no significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.071, P = 0.943). In the Conbercept group, the mean reduction in CRT from baseline to month 12 was 435.26 ± 293.37 µm (t = 8.261, P = 0.000) compared to 431.36 ± 294.55 (t = 8.413, P = 0.000) in the Conbercept + DEX group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t = 0.053, P = 0.958). The Conbercept + DEX group received fewer intravitreal injections. No major complications occurred. Conclusion: Conbercept, alone or with DEX, can improve BCVA and reduce CRT in ME following CRVO without serious adverse events. The treatment interval was longer in the Conbercept + DEX group. Trial Registration: The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 5 July 2017. (http://www.chictr.org.cn, 05/07/2017 Registration Number: ChiCTR-INR-17011877).

Effect of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Objective: To explore the clinical effect of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation (LP) in treating diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 118 patients with DME admitted to The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2021 to March 2023. Among them, 38 patients received LP alone (Laser-group), 39 patients received ranibizumab alone (Ranibizumab-group), and 41 patients received LP combined with ranibizumab (Combined-group). The improvement of macular edema (ME), visual acuity, and complications between the groups were compared. Results: The time of ME regression, exudation absorption and fundus hemorrhage absorption in the Combined-group was shorter than in the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). After treatment, the CMT and RNV of the three groups decreased compared to pretreatment levels and were lower in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). BCVA increased after the treatment in all groups, and was markedly higher in the Combined-group than in the Laser and the Ranibizumab-groups (P<0.05). NO were higher in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group. The post-treatment VEGF levels decreased in all groups, and were significantly lower in the Combined-group compared to the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the Combined-group was lower than in the Laser-group and the Ranibizumab-group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared to ranibizumab or LP alone, ranibizumab combined with LP is more effective in reducing ME in patients with DEM, and is associated with fewer complications.

Central retinal vein occlusion in patients with metastatic solid tumors on tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a report of case series and literature review.

Background: Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a rare adverse effect related to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic malignancies, which has only been reported in several case reports. Case presentation: We reported the case series of three CRVO patients on regular regimens of TKIs as part of targeted therapies for metastatic malignancies, all of whom were otherwise healthy with no or well-controlled systemic conditions. All these patients received injections of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) and achieved a fluid-free macula at the end of the visit. In addition, we reviewed the existing literature on this subject and present here an updated analysis of the related TKIs, ocular presentation, treatment, and prognosis. Conclusion: All patients diagnosed with CRVO on TKIs received dexamethasone implant treatment and obtained a fluid-free macula. We would like to raise awareness among our colleague oncologists about the possibility of CRVO related to TKI use and the necessity for patients to be screened regularly by a retinal specialist.

[Aflibercept in a real-world setting: the AURIGA study : 24-month results of the German cohort of treatment-naïve patients with macular edema following retinal vein occlusion receiving intravitreal aflibercept]. / Aflibercept im klinischen Alltag: die AURIGA-Studie : 24-Monats-Ergebnisse der deutschen Kohorte behandlungsnaiver Patienten mit Makulaödem bei retinalem Venenverschluss unter Therapie mit intravitrealem Aflibercept.

BACKGROUND: AURIGA is the largest prospective real-world study to evaluate intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (IVT-AFL) treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and diabetic macular edema. Here we present the 24-month data from the German cohort of treatment-naïve patients with ME due to RVO. METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with ME secondary to RVO were treated with IVT-AFL 2 mg in the routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA, early treatment diabetic retinopathy, ETDRS, letters) at month 12 compared to baseline. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Analysis included 130 patients with RVO (n = 61, 46.9% with central RVO, n = 69, 53.1% with branch RVO). The mean (± SD) time the RVO patients remained in the study was 18.4 ± 7.4 months. The mean VA gain (95% confidence interval) in the overall cohort was +10.9 (7.5-14.2) letters at month 12 and +9.7 (6.1-13.3) at month 24 (baseline VA 56.5 ± 18.9 letters). At 24 months, 67% of RVO patients gained ≥5 letters and 40% gained ≥15 letters. The mean number of injections was 4.4 ± 1.3 up to month 6, 6.2 ± 2.7 up to month 12 and 8.2 ± 4.5 up to month 24. The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction was -206µm (-252 to -160µm) at 12 months and -219µm (-263 to -175µm) at 24 months (baseline CRT 507 ± 177 µm). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous studies. DISCUSSION: In the German AURIGA cohort of treatment-naïve patients with ME secondary to RVO, IVT-AFL 2 mg treatment in clinical practice resulted in rapid and clinically relevant VA gains and a reduction in CRT. These results were largely maintained over 24 months despite the low injection frequency from month 6.

Evaluation of combined epiretinal membrane removal with intravitreal triamcinolone injection utilizing ectopic inner foveal layer staging scheme.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the macular morphological and visual outcomes of combined idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) removal with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection based on consideration of the ectopic inner foveal layer (EIFL) staging scheme. METHODS: Retrospective case-control study. The clinical data of 84 eyes of 84 patients who underwent vitrectomy for iERM between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed. The enrolled subjects were divided into the TA and non-TA groups. Fifty-one eyes received intravitreal TA injection following vitrectomy and ERM peeling (TA group), and 33 were only treated by standard vitrectomy and ERM peeling (non-TA group). Preoperative and postoperative EIFL stages, central foveal thickness (CFT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared between both groups. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 7.69 ± 3.68 months, both groups exhibited significant improvement in EIFL stages (P < 0.01), with no discernible advantage observed in the TA group. The TA and non-TA groups demonstrated improvement in the EIFL stages in 56.86 and 63.64% of eyes, respectively (P = 0.43). The CFT and BCVA significantly improved in both groups at the final visit (P < 0.01). However, CFT in the non-TA group displayed a more significant reduction during the follow-up (P < 0.03). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in postoperative CFT and BCVA between the two groups in cases with or without continuous EIFL (P > 0.10). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that combined intravitreal TA injection following ERM removal conferred no significant benefits in alleviating macular thickening or improving visual acuity in iERM.

Retinal vascular morphological characteristics in diabetic retinopathy: an artificial intelligence study using a transfer learning system to analyze ultra-wide field images.

AIM: To investigate the morphological characteristics of retinal vessels in patients with different severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and in patients with or without diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: The 239 eyes of DR patients and 100 eyes of healthy individuals were recruited for the study. The severity of DR patients was graded as mild, moderate and severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) according to the international clinical diabetic retinopathy (ICDR) disease severity scale classification, and retinal vascular morphology was quantitatively analyzed in ultra-wide field images using RU-net and transfer learning methods. The presence of DME was determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and differences in vascular morphological characteristics were compared between patients with and without DME. RESULTS: Retinal vessel segmentation using RU-net and transfer learning system had an accuracy of 99% and a Dice metric of 0.76. Compared with the healthy group, the DR group had smaller vessel angles (33.68±3.01 vs 37.78±1.60), smaller fractal dimension (Df) values (1.33±0.05 vs 1.41±0.03), less vessel density (1.12±0.44 vs 2.09±0.36) and fewer vascular branches (206.1±88.8 vs 396.5±91.3), all P<0.001. As the severity of DR increased, Df values decreased, P=0.031. No significant difference between the DME and non-DME groups were observed in vascular morphological characteristics. CONCLUSION: In this study, an artificial intelligence retinal vessel segmentation system is used with 99% accuracy, thus providing with relatively satisfactory performance in the evaluation of quantitative vascular morphology. DR patients have a tendency of vascular occlusion and dropout. The presence of DME does not compromise the integral retinal vascular pattern.

The Association of Systemic Endothelial Dysfunction With Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema.

Our aim was to assess whether systemic endothelial dysfunction, evaluated non-invasively by flow mediated dilation (FMD), is associated with diabetic macular edema (DME) and to determine if it is further impaired in patients with diffuse-DME. Consecutive patients (n = 84) with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic retinopathy were enrolled. DME was not present in 38 (non-DME) and present in 46 patients; 25 with focal and 21 with diffuse-DME. No differences were detected between DME and non-DME groups regarding the clinical and demographic characteristics, except for the age of T2DM initiation (lower in non-DME). FMD values were significantly impaired in DME compared with non-DME patients, even after adjustment for multiple covariates (3.56 ± 1.03 vs 4.57 ± 1.25%, P = .003). Among DME patients, no differences were found concerning the clinical and demographic data, while FMD levels were significantly lower in diffuse-DME patients, compared with the focal-DME ones, regardless of the impact several confounders (2.88 ± 0.65 vs 4.08 ± 0.95%, P = .002). It is noteworthy that FMD values of non-DME and focal-DME patients did not differ significantly (4.52 ± 1.24 vs 4.21 ± 1.06%, P = .307). Moreover, among DME patients, impaired FMD was an independent predictor of diffuse-DME (odds ratio: 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.47, P = .007).

Nonlinear Relationship Between Low Density Lipoprotein and the Probability of Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose: Previous studies simply linearized the relationship between low density lipoprotein (LDL) and diabetic macular edema's (DME) probability, ignoring the possibility of a nonlinear relationship between them. We aimed to investigate the nonlinear relationship between LDL and DME probability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients and methods: The study recruited 431 T2DM patients who attended Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from December 2017 to November 2018. A multivariate logistic regression model was conducted to evaluate the association between LDL and DME probability. The nonlinear relationship was identified by generalized additive model. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the consistency of the association in different subgroups. Results: LDL was positively associated with DME probability (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.10~2.34, P=0.0145) after adjusting for covariates. A nonlinear relationship between LDL and DME probability was discovered, with an inflection point for LDL around 4.85 mmol/L (95% CI: 4.18~4.93, P=0.037). The effect sizes and the confidence intervals on the left and right sides of inflection point were 2.17 (1.31 to 3.58) and 0.26 (0.04 to 1.77), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed other variables had no effect on the association between them. Conclusion: Our finding suggested LDL was positively correlated with DME probability in T2DM patients. And the relationship between LDL and DME probability was nonlinear. Our findings need to be confirmed by further causal researches.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of conbercept for moderate to severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) in treating moderate to severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), with or without accompanying diabetic macular edema. Methods: In this longitudinal retrospective study, 35 patients (50 eyes) with moderate to severe NPDR and Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores between 43 and 53 were treated at the Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, from October 2018 to January 2023. Treatment protocol included three monthly IVC injections followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen over a two-year follow-up period. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, central macular thickness (CMT), extent of hard exudate (HE), and changes in DRSS scores. DRSS scores before and after treatment were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Both systemic and ocular adverse events were meticulously documented to ascertain safety. Results: From baseline to the final follow-up, the mean BCVA improved from 0.41 ± 0.39 to 0.23 ± 0.20 logMAR (p<0.05). The mean CMT decreased from 306.22 ± 77.40 to 297.97 ± 88.15 µm (p = 0.385). At 24 months, DRSS scores improved by ≥1 stage in 40 eyes (80%), ≥ 2 stages in 28 eyes (56%), ≥3 stages in 10 eyes (20%), and remained stable in 6 eyes (12%). The DRSS scores at each follow-up interval demonstrated statistically significant improvement from baseline (p<0.05). In 15 of 27 eyes (55.56%) with diabetic macular edema (DME), there was a significant reduction in the mean area of HE from baseline (p<0.05). No serious systemic adverse events were observed. Conclusion: IVC is an effective and safe treatment for moderate to severe NPDR, demonstrating significant improvements in DRSS scores.

[Anatomical and functional outcomes of the "3+PRN" therapeutic protocol in the treatment of diabetic macular edema]. / Résultats anatomiques et fonctionnels du protocole thérapeutique « 3+PRN ¼ dans le traitement de l'œdème maculaire diabétique.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomical and functional results of the "3+PRN" protocol in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), determine the predictive factors for good final visual acuity, and compare it to other protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study of patients with DME, which we dubbed HTSM. All patients were treated with three monthly initial intravitreal injections (IVT) of 1.25mg bevacizumab and followed according to the pro re nata (PRN) protocol for a period of 3years. The protocol was based on a monthly monitoring schedule for the first 3months, then increasingly spaced out over time. "On-demand" treatment was indicated with resumption of bevacizumab IVT in the event of worsening of DME. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included. The mean age was 65years. Type 2 was the most frequently observed type of diabetes. The mean duration of the PRN protocol was 6months, and the mean number of injections was 6. The mean visual acuity (VA), initially 1/10, improved to 3/10 by the conclusion of the 3+PRN protocol, with an improvement of more than 5 letters in 77.6% of cases. The mean initial central macular thickness (CMT) was 451.5µm. The final mean EMC decreased to 298.5µm, which corresponds to a reduction of 153µm compared to the initial value. The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness, initially 304.2µm, decreased to a mean of 284.5µm at completion. Comparative analysis of the results before and after the PRN protocol confirmed the existence of a statistically significant correlation between VA and CMT (P<0.05). No correlation was observed between age and visual acuity or between initial and final VA. The analysis of the various tomographic parameters and VA revealed a significantly better visual improvement in the group in whom the external limiting membrane (MLE) and ellipsoid zone (ZE) were intact (P=0.04), as well as in the group in whom serous retinal detachment (SRD) was absent (P<0.001). Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was the most frequently observed vitreomacular anomaly. The final VA was similar in the groups with and without PVD (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: The 3+PRN protocol is effective both functionally and tomographically in the treatment of DME. Various tomographic parameters might influence therapeutic efficacy. However, further in-depth studies are needed to better investigate these parameters.

Association between choroidal thickness and diabetic macular edema: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: To evaluate the association between subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective or prospective study comparing SFCT in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients with and without DME was included. The data were collected from published studies retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Library. The final search was conducted on July 2, 2023. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and a random-effects model was used for the meta analysis. This study calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for SFCT. RESULTS: A total of 26 relevant studies were identified, involving a combined sample size of 3201 eyes (1302 DR-DME eyes and 1899 DR-no DME eyes). The results showed no significance between DR-DME and DR-no DME (WMD = - 3.57 µm; 95% CI -26.54 to 19.41 µm; P = 0.76). Sub-analysis based on nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) subgroups showed that the SFCT of NPDR-DME was significantly thinner than that of NPDR-no DME eyes (WMD = - 19.80 µm; 95% CI - 34.55 to - 5.04 µm; P = 0.009), while there was no significance in SFCT between PDR-DME and PDR-no DME (WMD = - 26.45 µm; 95% CI - 104.00 to 51.11 µm; P = 0.50). CONCLUSION: The SFCT was thinner in NPDR-DME eyes compared to NPDR-no DME eyes. Thinning SFCT might cause retinal hypoxia, and play an important role in DME occurrence. Additionally, this study highlights the importance of considering DR grades and treatment history when evaluating SFCT between DME and no DME.

Woman with vigorexia experiencing severe bilateral vision loss.

We describe a 28-year-old Caucasian female with vigorexy, who had no previous ocular history. She presented with bilateral gradual painless reduction in vision over the past 3 weeks. She had been taking niacin supplements, averaging 500 mg daily, for 7 years. Fundus examination revealed bilateral CME, which was confirmed by ocular coherence tomography scan. Fundus fluorescein angiography did not reveal any fluid leakage. Niacin supplementation was discontinued, and after 2 months, the CME had completely resolved, and the best corrected visual acuities improved to 1 in both eyes.

Macular Ischemia Changes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept and Ranibizumab.

Τhis study aims to assess changes in the fovea avascular zone (FAZ) in treatment naïve patients receiving aflibercept or ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular edema (DME). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, OCT, and OCT-angiography imaging were performed at baseline and 1 month after each injection. Injections of either aflibercept or ranibizumab were administered monthly for 6 consecutive months. FAZ in the superficial (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) using OCT angiography was recorded for each visit. Fifty eyes from fifty patients with a mean age of 67.0 ± 10.7 years were included in the study. Twenty-five patients received aflibercept and twenty-five received ranibizumab. BCVA was 40.8 ± 10.0 and increased to 52.1 ± 7.9 ETDRS letters at the last visit (p < 0.001). CRT was 295.6 ± 34.0 at baseline and 247.9 ± 29.7 at the last study visit (p < 0.001). SCP FAZ was 350.6 ± 79.5 µm2 at baseline and 339.0 ± 71.3 µm2 after sox monthly injections (p = 0.132). DCP FAZ was 558.6 ± 199.0 µm2 at baseline and 459.5 ± 156.1 µm2 after six monthly injections (p < 0.001). There was no effect of the choice of ranibizumab or aflibercept on DCP FAZ change (p = 0.277). In conclusion, treatment with 6 monthly injections of ranibizumab and aflibercept led to an increase in BCVA and a decrease in CRT and DCP FAZ area. Both drugs led to an improvement in DCP ischemia.

Gene Therapy for Non-Hereditary Retinal Disease: Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy, and Beyond.

Gene therapy holds promise as a transformative approach in the treatment landscape of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic macular edema (DME), aiming to address the challenges of frequent intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. This manuscript reviews ongoing gene therapy clinical trials for these disorders, including ABBV-RGX-314, ixoberogene soroparvovec (ixo-vec), and 4D-150. ABBV-RGX-314 utilizes an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector to deliver a transgene encoding a ranibizumab-like anti-VEGF antibody fragment, demonstrating promising results in Phase 1/2a and ongoing Phase 2b/3 trials. Ixo-vec employs an AAV2.7m8 capsid for intravitreal delivery of a transgene expressing aflibercept, showing encouraging outcomes in Phase 1 and ongoing Phase 2 trials. 4D-150 utilizes an evolved vector to express both aflibercept and a VEGF-C inhibitory RNAi, exhibiting positive interim results in Phase 1/2 studies. Other therapies reviewed include EXG102-031, FT-003, KH631, OLX10212, JNJ-1887, 4D-175, and OCU410. These therapies offer potential advantages of reduced treatment frequency and enhanced safety profiles, representing a paradigm shift in management towards durable and efficacious cellular-based biofactories. These advancements in gene therapy hold promise for improving outcomes in AMD and addressing the complex challenges of DME and DR, providing new avenues for the treatment of diabetic eye diseases.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Focusing on the Role of OCT Biomarkers

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of Ozurdex® (DEX) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in real-world clinical practice, and to determine the correlation between known OCT biomarkers and the effect of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (16 women, 17 men) treated with DEX at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc for DME indication between 2020 and 2023. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after the first DEX application. The main assessed parameters were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT), OCT biomarkers. The results were subsequently statistically evaluated. RESULTS: At the first follow-up after DEX application, there was an average decrease in CRT of 186 ±146µm and a gain of 3 ±7 letters. Positive morphological and functional responses were observed in 39 eyes (92.9%) and 23 eyes (54.8%) respectively. The disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) biomarker was initially present in 41 eyes (97.6%), with reduction or disappearance observed in 13 eyes (31%) post-application. Eyes with ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) had an average initial BCVA of 49.6 letters, compared to 57.8 letters in the group without this biomarker. The mean gain in BCVA was +8.7 letters in treatment-naive eyes and +2.1 letters in previously treated eyes. Chronic DME was less frequent in treatment-naive (n = 1, 14.3%) compared to previously treated eyes (n = 28, 84.8%). All these results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). An increase in IOP post-DEX application occurred in 9 patients (21.4%). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm DEX as a safe and effective treatment option for DME. Treatment-naive patients achieved better functional outcomes. We confirmed ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) as a negative biomarker. Additionally, we demonstrated the capacity of DEX to reduce disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL).