Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(10): 1270-1279, 2024 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38596501

ABSTRACT

In 2000, the small bowel capsule revolutionized the management of patients with small bowel disorders. Currently, the technological development achieved by the new models of double-headed endoscopic capsules, as miniaturized devices to evaluate the small bowel and colon [pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy (PCE)], makes this non-invasive procedure a disruptive concept for the management of patients with digestive disorders. This technology is expected to identify which patients will require conventional invasive endoscopic procedures (colonoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy), based on the lesions detected by the capsule, i.e., those with an indication for biopsies or endoscopic treatment. The use of PCE in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, namely Crohn's disease, as well as in patients with iron deficiency anaemia and/or overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, after a non-diagnostic upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy), enables an effective, safe and comfortable way to identify patients with relevant lesions, who should undergo subsequent invasive endoscopic procedures. The recent development of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy to evaluate the upper GI tract, is a further step towards the possibility of an entirely non-invasive assessment of all the segments of the digestive tract, from mouth-to-anus, meeting the expectations of the early developers of capsule endoscopy.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Crohn Disease , Intestinal Diseases , Humans , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects , Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Intestinal Diseases/pathology , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/surgery , Intestine, Small/pathology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(9): 1121-1131, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), an invasive examination method, can cause discomfort and pain in patients. In contrast, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE), a noninvasive method, is being applied for the detection of stomach and small intestinal diseases, but its application in treating esophageal diseases is not widespread. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of detachable string MCE (ds-MCE) for the diagnosis of esophageal diseases. METHODS: Fifty patients who had been diagnosed with esophageal diseases were prospectively recruited for this clinical study and underwent ds-MCE and conventional EGD. The primary endpoints included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for patients with esophageal diseases. The secondary endpoints consisted of visualizing the esophageal and dentate lines, as well as the subjects' tolerance of the procedure. RESULTS: Using EGD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for esophageal disease detection were 85.71%, 86.21%, 81.82%, 89.29%, and 86%, respectively. ds-MCE was more comfortable and convenient than EGD was, with 80% of patients feeling that ds-MCE examination was very comfortable or comfortable and 50% of patients believing that detachable string v examination was very convenient. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that ds-MCE has the same diagnostic effects as traditional EGD for esophageal diseases and is more comfortable and convenient than EGD, providing a novel noninvasive method for treating esophageal diseases.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Esophageal Diseases , Humans , Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Prospective Studies , Esophageal Diseases/diagnosis , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol ; 16: 17562848231206991, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900007

ABSTRACT

Background: Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) is a non-invasive, painless, comfortable, and safe equipment to diagnose gastrointestinal diseases (GID), partially overcoming the shortcomings of conventional endoscopy and wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE). With advancements in technology, the main technical parameters of MCCE have continuously been improved, and MCCE has become more intelligent. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the research progress of MCCE and artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis and treatment of GID. Data Sources and Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE for published studies on GID detection of MCCE, physical factors related to MCCE imaging quality, the application of AI in aiding MCCE, and its additional functions. We synergistically reviewed the included studies, extracted relevant data, and made comparisons. Results: MCCE was confirmed to have the same performance as conventional gastroscopy and WCE in detecting common GID, while it lacks research in detecting early gastric cancer (EGC). The body position and cleanliness of the gastrointestinal tract are the main factors affecting imaging quality. The applications of AI in screening intestinal diseases have been comprehensive, while in the detection of common gastric diseases such as ulcers, it has been developed. MCCE can perform some additional functions, such as observations of drug behavior in the stomach and drug damage to the gastric mucosa. Furthermore, it can be improved to perform a biopsy. Conclusion: This comprehensive review showed that the MCCE technology has made great progress, but studies on GID detection and treatment by MCCE are in the primary stage. Further studies are required to confirm the performance of MCCE.

4.
Front Pharmacol ; 14: 1184754, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37701026

ABSTRACT

Goals: To explore factors associated with inadequate gastric preparation for MCE. Background: Factors associated with inadequate gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) remains unclear. Study: Data of patients who underwent MCE from June 2021 to July 2022 were prospectively collected. The gastric cleanliness score (GCS) of the six stomach regions (gastric cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum, and pylorus) was recorded. Patients with GCS score ≥18 were defined as the adequate preparation. Factors related to inadequate gastric preparation were analyzed using a logistic regression model with estimated odds ratios (OR). Results: The mean GCS score of 211 patients was 17.01 ± 2.82. In the multivariable analysis, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use (OR 3.57; 95% CI 1.69-7.95; p < 0.01) and premedication time after administering simethicone <30 min (OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.10-7.39; p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for inadequate gastric preparation. Comparing the gastric cleanliness of different locations, the median GCS of the lower stomach [10.00, IQR (9.50, 11.00)] was significantly higher than that of the upper stomach [7.00, IQR (6.00, 8.00)] (p <0.001). Conclusion: PPI use and inadequate premedication time (<30 min) may reduce the quality of gastric preparation for MCE. The type, dose, duration of medication, and discontinuation time of PPIs was well worth further exploration. Appropriate control of the type and time of premedication may be the key to improving overall gastric cleanliness.

5.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 23(1): 76, 2023 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36927462

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Complete and consecutive observation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract continues to present challenges for current endoscopy systems. We developed a novel upper and mid gastrointestinal (UMGI) capsule endoscopy using the modified detachable string magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (DS-MCE) and inspection method and aimed to assess the clinical application. METHODS: Patients were recruited to undergo UMGI capsule endoscopy followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. All capsule procedures in the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract were conducted under the control of magnet and string. The main outcome was technical success, and the secondary outcomes included visualization of the UMGI tract, examination time, diagnostic yield, compliance, and safety evaluation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled and all UMGI capsule procedures realized repeated observation of the esophagus and duodenum with detection rates of 100.0%, 80.0%, and 86.7% of Z-line, duodenal papilla, and reverse side of pylorus, respectively. String detachment was succeeded in 29 patients (96.7%) and the complete examination rate of UMGI tract was 95.45% (21/22). All UMGI capsule procedures were well tolerated with low discomfort score, and had a good diagnostic yield with per-lesion sensitivity of 96.2% in UGI diseases. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This new capsule endoscopy system provides an alternative screening modality for the UMGI tract, and might be indicated in cases of suspected upper and small bowel GI bleeding. Trial registration DS-MCE-UGI and SB, NCT04329468. Registered 27 March 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04329468 .


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract , Humans , Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Esophagus , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology
6.
Gastroenterology ; 164(6): e30-e31, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30981792
7.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 11(1): 42-50, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36416805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remote endoscopy can improve diagnostic efficiency of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases for patients in remote areas. A novel remote magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system based on a 5G network was developed for real-time remote GI examinations. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the 5G-based remote MCE for examination of the stomach and small bowel. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study. Consecutive participants enrolled in the First People's Hospital of Yinchuan underwent remote MCE examinations performed by an endoscopist located in Changhai Hospital. Consecutive participants enrolled in Changhai Hospital underwent conventional MCE examinations performed by the same endoscopist. The main outcomes included the complete visualization rate of the stomach and small bowel, safety assessment and network latency time of remote MCE examinations. RESULTS: From March 2021 to June 2021, 20 participants in each group were enrolled. The complete visualization rate of the stomach and small bowel was 100% in both groups (p > 0.999) without any adverse event. The median network latency time of remote MCE group was 19.948 ms. Gastric examination time (8.96 vs. 8.92 min, p = 0.234), maneuverability (15.00 vs. 15.00, p = 0.317), image quality (1.00 vs. 1.00, p > 0.999) and diagnostic yields in the stomach and small bowel (55% vs. 30%, 5% vs. 0%, both p > 0.05) were comparable between remote and conventional MCE groups. All participants in remote MCE group considered remote MCE acceptable and necessary. CONCLUSIONS: 5G-based remote MCE was a feasible and safe method for viewing the stomach and small bowel.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Humans , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Stomach/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology
8.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J ; 20: 5524-5534, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249561

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal diseases are complex diseases that occur in the gastrointestinal tract. Common gastrointestinal diseases include chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, inflammatory bowel disease, and gastrointestinal tumors. These diseases may manifest a long course, difficult treatment, and repeated attacks. Gastroscopy and mucosal biopsy are the gold standard methods for diagnosing gastric and duodenal diseases, but they are invasive procedures and carry risks due to the necessity of sedation and anesthesia. Recently, several new approaches have been developed, including serological examination and magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MGCE). However, serological markers lack lesion information, while MGCE images lack molecular information. This study proposes combining these two technologies in a collaborative noninvasive diagnostic scheme as an alternative to the standard procedures. We introduce an interpretable framework for the clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases. Based on collected blood samples and MGCE records of patients with gastrointestinal diseases and comparisons with normal individuals, we selected serum metabolite signatures by bioinformatic analysis, captured image embedding signatures by convolutional neural networks, and inferred the location-specific associations between these signatures. Our study successfully identified five key metabolite signatures with functional relevance to gastrointestinal disease. The combined signatures achieved discrimination AUC of 0.88. Meanwhile, the image embedding signatures showed different levels of validation and testing accuracy ranging from 0.7 to 0.9 according to different locations in the gastrointestinal tract as explained by their specific associations with metabolite signatures. Overall, our work provides a new collaborative noninvasive identification pipeline and candidate metabolite biomarkers for image auxiliary diagnosis. This method should be valuable for the noninvasive detection and interpretation of gastrointestinal and other complex diseases.

9.
Surg Endosc ; 36(12): 9454-9461, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36112221

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) has recently increasingly been used for gastric examination. However, the image quality and esophageal observation is suboptimal. We developed a novel wired transmission magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (WT-MCCE) system and evaluated its feasibility through in vitro and in vivo experiments. METHODS: A plastic stomach model and a pathological upper gastrointestinal model were used to evaluate the performance of WT-MCCE in vitro experiments. Twice of examination in the two in vitro models by WT-MCCE were performed by 5 endoscopists who were experienced in performing wireless capsule endoscopy. The examination of traditional gastroscopy (Olympus, GIF-HQ290) in the pathological upper gastrointestinal model was set as the control. In vivo experiments were performed in a live canine model by 3 endoscopists, in which WT-MCCE was inserted with the assistance of gastroscopy. Measurements included maneuverability, examination time, visualization of gastric mucosa, image quality and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: WT-MCCE showed good performance in both in vitro and in vivo experiments with excellent visualization of mucosa (75-100%). The mean operation time is 17.6 ± 2.7 min, 22.3 ± 1.9 min and 29.3 ± 3.4 min in three models, respectively. In pathological upper gastrointestinal model, all lesions, including esophageal varices, one polyp, one foreign body, two gastric ulcers and one duodenal ulcer, were detected by both WT-MCCE and traditional gastroscopy by all endoscopists. For the observation of esophagus and stomach in the canine model, WT-MCCE also showed excellent maneuverability and good image quality. CONCLUSIONS: The novel WT-MCCE system performed well in evaluating upper gastrointestinal landmarks and lesions in two in vitro models, and showed good performance in a canine model. WT-MCCE may be potentially useful for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric diseases.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Stomach Ulcer , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract , Dogs , Animals , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Gastroscopy/methods , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/diagnostic imaging
10.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 22(1): 222, 2022 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35509022

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The lesions of certain diseases are widely distributed in both stomach and small intestine, while the step-by-step strategy of gastroscopy followed by enteroscopy can be burdensome and costly. We aimed to determine if magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) could be used in one-time gastro-small intestine (GSI) joint examination. METHODS: In this study, data of patients in Chinese PLA General Hospital and Changhai Hospital who underwent MCE GSI examination from January 2020 to August 2021 were retrospectively analysed. The primary outcome of this study was the success rate of one-time GSI joint examination, and secondary outcomes included visualization and cleanliness of gastrointestinal tract, gastrointestinal transit times, diagnostic yield and safety of MCE examination. RESULTS: A total of 768 patients were included. The success rate of one-time GSI joint examination was 92.58%. There were 94.92% MCEs observed > 90% gastric mucosa in the 6 anatomic landmarks. The rate of complete small bowel examination was 97.40%. The median gastric examination time, gastric transit time and small intestine transit time were 8.18 min, 63.89 min and 4.89 h, respectively. Magnetic steering of MCE significantly decreased gastric transit time (8.92 min vs. 79.68 min, P = 0.001) and increased duodenal lesion detection rate (13.47% vs. 6.26%, P = 0.001) when compared with non-magnetic steering group. Two capsules were retained and were removed by enteroscopy or spontaneously excreted. CONCLUSIONS: MCE is feasible to complete GSI joint examination and the detection of both gastric and small intestinal diseases can be achieved simultaneously. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05069233.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Gastroscopy , Humans , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Stomach/diagnostic imaging
11.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 57(10): 1195-1201, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35534443

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Aspirin can reduce cardiovascular disease risk; however, it can increase the risk of gastrointestinal injury. Lactobacilli have some protective effects; however, there are few studies on their effects on humans. This study investigates the effects of Lactobacillus complex capsule treatment on the aspirin-related small intestinal mucosal injury. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial included 69 patients using enteric-coated aspirin for >1 month between May and December 2019. After baseline magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE), patients with aspirin-related small intestinal mucosal injury were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive enteric-coated aspirin and Lactobacillus complex capsules containing a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus I, Lactobacillus rhamnosus II, and Enterococcus faecium (probiotics group) or enteric-coated aspirin only (control group) for 2 months. After treatment, the patient underwent MCCE again. The primary outcome was the change in small intestinal mucosal injury scores from baseline to post-intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients in the probiotics group and 28 in the control group completed the trial. The decrease in small intestinal mucosal injury scores from baseline to post-intervention was significantly greater in the probiotics group than that in the control group (p < .001). The improvement rates of red spots and erosions in the probiotics group were higher compared with the control group (p = .027 and .022, respectively), and the improvement rate of small intestinal ulcers in the probiotics group was 75.0%; however, there was no improvement in the control group. CONCLUSION: Lactobacillus complex capsules can ameliorate aspirin-related small intestinal mucosal injury.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Probiotics , Aspirin/adverse effects , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa , Intestine, Small , Lactobacillus , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies
12.
Chinese Journal of Digestion ; (12): 764-769, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-958357

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the value of detachable string-magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (DS-MCE) in the evaluation of post-endoscopic treatment of liver cirrhosis patients with gastroesophageal varices during follow-up, and conventional electronic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was used as the gold standard.Methods:From July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021, 50 follow-up patients with gastroesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis and had a past medical history of endoscopic treatment in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were selected. DS-MCE and EGD were performed in turn. The 2 endoscopic examination methods were compared and analyzed in the assessment of detecting gastroesophageal varices, grading of diameter of esophageal varices and classification of bleeding risk factors (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value), diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy and its severity, and the patients′ satisfaction (pre-procedural perceptual and post-procedural satisfaction). Kruskal-Wallis test and Kappa test were used for statistical analysis.Results:The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of esophageal varices were 100.0% (43/43), 85.7%(6/7), 97.7% (43/44) and 100.0%(6/6), respectively.The accuracy of DS-MCE in evaluating the grading of esophageal varices was 86.0% (43/50), with good consistency of EGD, and the Kappa value was 0.797 ( P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of esophageal varices with bleeding risk factors were 94.4% (34/36), 100.0%(14/14), 100.0% (34/34) and 87.5%(14/16), respectively. The accuracy of DS-MCE in evaluating esophageal varices with bleeding risk factors was 94.0% (47/50), with good consistency of EGD, and the Kappa value was 0.862 ( P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of gastric varices were 85.7% (18/21), 93.1% (27/29), 90.0% (18/20) and 90.0% (27/30), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy were all 100.0% (50/50). The consistency of DS-MCE and EGD in the severity grading of portal hypertensive gastropathy was good, the Kappa value was 0.962 ( P<0.001). The results of pre-procedural perceptual analysis showed that patients′ psychological tension before examination and expected pain before examination of DS-MCE were better than those of EGD ( H=16.04 and 23.74, both P<0.001). The results of satisfactory analysis after examination indicated that DS-MCE was better than EGD in the degree of difficulty in swallowing, pain and discomfort during examination, pain and discomfort after examination, comfort degree during examination, convenience of the procedure and willingness of receiving such examination again as gastric examination method ( H=17.28, 30.88, 44.68, 34.66, 48.05, 22.74, 13.03 and 17.19, all P<0.001). Conclusions:With EGD as the gold standard, DS-MCE can accurately evaluate gastroesophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastroenteropathy after endoscopic treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices, and it is a safe and comfortable method. DS-MCE can be an efficient alternative method in endoscopic follow-up of such patients.

13.
VideoGIE ; 6(7): 333-338, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278100

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Actual behaviors of drugs in the upper GI tract are not well elucidated. We assess the feasibility of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) in direct and real-time visualization of oral drug behaviors in the stomach. METHODS: From November 2019 to December 2019, 9 patients with a recent history of upper GI symptoms and 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Participants swallowed magnetically controlled capsules to examine the whole stomach. After baseline examination, participants ingested dyed sucralfate gel, and MCE recorded the adhesion time, retention time, and distribution area of sucralfate gel. Outcomes included behaviors of sucralfate gel, safety, and satisfaction assessment of the procedures. RESULTS: Adhesion time of sucralfate gel in the abdominal symptoms group was significantly shorter than in the healthy control group (23.76 ± 1.37 minutes vs 31.96 ± 3.09 minutes; P = .032), whereas retention time was longer (98.85 ± 13.94 minutes vs 63.93 ± 8.57 minutes; P = .043). The distribution area of sucralfate gel in the abdominal symptoms group was significantly larger than in healthy control group in cardia (24.29 ± 7.39 vs 9.18 ± 4.06; P < .0001), fundus (18.90 ± 7.08 vs 8.49 ± 4.10; P = .0015), and pylorus (4.64 ± 2.72 vs 0.94 ± 0.90; P = .0019). No adverse events were observed. All participants had a high degree of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: MCE is a feasible and noninvasive tool for direct and real-time visualization of drug behaviors (eg, sucralfate gel) in the stomach. (ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT04327869.).

14.
Chin J Integr Med ; 27(8): 621-625, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34105097

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Weikang Capsule (, WKC) on aspirin-related gastric and small intestinal mucosal injury by magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE). METHODS: Patients taking enteric-coated aspirin aged 40-75 years were enrolled in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2019 to December 2019. The patients continued taking aspirin Tablet (100 mg per day) and underwent MCCE before and after 1-month combined treatment with WKC (0.9 g per time orally, 3 times per day). The gastrointestinal symptom score, gastric Lanza score, the duodenal, jejunal and ileal mucosal injury scores were used to evaluate the gastrointestinal injury before and after treatment. Adverse events including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, abdominal discomfort, dizziness, or headache during MCCE and combined treatment were observed and recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (male/female, 13/9) taking enteric-coated aspirin aged 59.5 ± 11.3 years with a duration of aspirin use of 28.0 (1.0, 48.0) months were recruited. Compared with pre-treatment, the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale scores, gastric Lanza scores, and duodenal mucosal injury scores were significantly reduced after 1-month WKC treatment (P<0.05), and jejunal and ileal mucosal injury scores showed no obvious change. No adverse events occurred during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: WKC can alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as gastric and duodenal mucosal injuries, in patients taking enteric-coated aspirin; it does not aggravate jejunal or ileal mucosal injury, which may be an effective alternative for these patients (Clinical trial registry No. ChiCTR1900025451).


Subject(s)
Gastric Mucosa , Intestinal Mucosa , Aged , Aspirin/adverse effects , Capsule Endoscopy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stomach
15.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-888679

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the effects of Weikang Capsule (, WKC) on aspirin-related gastric and small intestinal mucosal injury by magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE).@*METHODS@#Patients taking enteric-coated aspirin aged 40-75 years were enrolled in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2019 to December 2019. The patients continued taking aspirin Tablet (100 mg per day) and underwent MCCE before and after 1-month combined treatment with WKC (0.9 g per time orally, 3 times per day). The gastrointestinal symptom score, gastric Lanza score, the duodenal, jejunal and ileal mucosal injury scores were used to evaluate the gastrointestinal injury before and after treatment. Adverse events including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, abdominal discomfort, dizziness, or headache during MCCE and combined treatment were observed and recorded.@*RESULTS@#Twenty-two patients (male/female, 13/9) taking enteric-coated aspirin aged 59.5 ± 11.3 years with a duration of aspirin use of 28.0 (1.0, 48.0) months were recruited. Compared with pre-treatment, the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale scores, gastric Lanza scores, and duodenal mucosal injury scores were significantly reduced after 1-month WKC treatment (P<0.05), and jejunal and ileal mucosal injury scores showed no obvious change. No adverse events occurred during the trial.@*CONCLUSIONS@#WKC can alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as gastric and duodenal mucosal injuries, in patients taking enteric-coated aspirin; it does not aggravate jejunal or ileal mucosal injury, which may be an effective alternative for these patients (Clinical trial registry No. ChiCTR1900025451).

17.
Dis Esophagus ; 33(4)2020 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32008045

ABSTRACT

Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system has been used to screen gastric lesions. However, the visualization performance of MCE in the esophagus has not been investigated systematically. String method improved the ability of capsule endoscopy (CE) for esophageal observing; however, the string attachment is complicated and cannot be detached with the CE inside the esophagus. We used a modified string, called detachable string attached to MCE. The aim of the study was to compare the observation performance of MCE with and without the detachable string. A total of 238 participants with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and a healthy check who refused esophagogastroduodenoscopy examination were retrospectively divided into the detachable string MCE group and the MCE alone group from June 2016 to May 2018. A suction cap with a thin, hollow string was attached to the MCE system in the detachable string group. Circumferential visualization of the esophagus including the upper, middle, and lower esophagus and Z-line, and esophageal focal lesion, as well as the recording time, safety and tolerability of the procedure, were assessed. The circumferential visualization of the upper, middle, and lower esophagus and Z-line was more efficient in the detachable string MCE group than in the MCE alone group (P < 0.001). In all, 31 esophageal lesions were detected in the detachable string MCE group, which was more than that in the MCE alone group (10, P < 0.001). The mean recording time was 305 seconds in the string MCE group, which was longer than that in the MCE alone group (48.5 seconds, P < 0.001). In seven participants (6.1%) in the detachable string MCE group, the capsule could not be separated from the string. Detachable string MCE showed better performance in terms of observation of the esophagus. Detachable string MCE can be used to screen for esophageal diseases as an alternative method in the future.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Esophageal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Magnetics/methods , Adult , Aged , Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation , Esophagoscopy/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
18.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 54(7): 934-937, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31328998

ABSTRACT

Background: Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) has emerged as a feasible and efficient diagnostic modality for gastric diseases. In a special group of patients, MCE may have an advantage over standard gastroscopy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of MCE in high-risk patients for standard gastroscopy. Methods: In this study, patients with high-risk factors for standard gastroscopy were examined by MCE between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017. The examination time, results, adverse events and clinical outcome were recorded. Results: Forty-two patients with high-risk factors for standard gastroscopy were enrolled in the present study. All patients successfully underwent MCE without any adverse events. Based on the findings from MCE, the patients were successfully treated. Conclusions: For patients with high-risk factors for standard gastroscopy, MCE could be the perfect alternative examination for gastric diseases. We recommend MCE as the first-line examination for high-risk patients, but its utility should be confirmed in further clinical studies.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Gastroscopy/methods , Stomach Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China , Female , Humans , Magnetics , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tertiary Care Centers
20.
Sci China Life Sci ; 61(11): 1304-1309, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30367341

ABSTRACT

Magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (MCCG) is a novel system primarily used for the diagnosis of gastric disease. It consists of an endoscopic capsule with magnetic material inside, external guidance magnet equipment, data recorder and computer workstation. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that MCCG is comparable in accuracy in diagnosing gastric focal disease when compared to conventional gastroscopy. Further clinical studies are needed to test the diagnostic accuracy and improve the functioning of MCCG. This novel MCCG system could be a promising alternative for screening for gastric diseases, with the advantages of no anesthesia required, comfort and high acceptance across populations.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy/trends , Stomach Diseases/diagnosis , Capsule Endoscopes/classification , Capsule Endoscopes/trends , Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation , Gastroscopy/trends , Humans , Magnetics , Safety , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...