Biomechanical study of injectable hollow pedicle screws for PMMA augmentation in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: effect of PMMA distribution and volume on screw stability.

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to compare stability of injectable hollow pedicle screws with different numbers of holes using different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae and analyze the relationship between screw stability and distribution and volume of PMMA.METHODSForty-eight severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into 3 groups-groups A, B, and C (16 vertebrae per group). The screws used in group A had 4 holes (2 pairs of holes, with the second hole of each pair placed 180° further along the thread than the first). The screws used in group B had 6 holes (3 pairs of holes, placed with the same 180° difference in position). Unmodified conventional screws were used in group C. Each group was randomly divided into subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3, with different volumes of PMMA used in each subgroup. Type A and B pedicle screws were directly inserted into the vertebrae in groups A and B, respectively, and then different volumes of PMMA were injected through the screws into the vertebrae in subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3. The pilot hole was filled with different volumes of PMMA followed by insertion of screws in groups C0, C1, C2, and C3. Distributions of PMMA were evaluated radiographically, and axial pull-out tests were performed to measure the maximum axial pullout strength (Fmax).RESULTSRadiographic examination revealed that PMMA surrounded the anterior third of the screws in the vertebral bodies (VBs) in groups A1, A2, and A3; the middle third of screws in the junction area of the vertebral body (VB) and pedicle in groups B1, B2, and B3; and the full length of screws evenly in both VB and pedicle in groups C1, C2, and C3. In addition, in groups A3 and B3, PMMA from each of the screws (left and right) was in contact with PMMA from the other screw and the PMMA was closer to the posterior wall and pedicle than in groups A1, A2, B1, and B2. One instance of PMMA leakage was found (in group B3). Two-way analysis of variance revealed that 2 factors-distribution and volume of PMMA-significantly influenced Fmax (p < 0.05) but that they were not significantly correlated (p = 0.078). The Fmax values in groups in which screws were augmented with PMMA were significantly better than those in groups in which no PMMA was used (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSPMMA can significantly improve stability of different injectable pedicle screws in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, and screw stability is significantly correlated with distribution and volume of PMMA. The closer the PMMA is to the pedicle and the greater the quantity of injected PMMA used, the greater the pedicle screw stability is. Injection of 3.0 mL PMMA through screws with 4 holes (2 pair of holes, with the screws in each pair placed on opposite sides of the screw) produces optimal stability in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.

Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is widely used for pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporosis. Until now, there had been no studies of the relationship between screw stability and the distribution and volume of PMMA. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between screw stability and the distribution pattern and injected volume of PMMA. STUDY DESIGN: This is a biomechanical comparison of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of PMMA in cadaveric osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae. METHODS: Forty-eight osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into Groups A, B, and C with different pedicle screws (16 vertebrae in each group), and then each group was randomly divided into Subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3 with different volumes of PMMA (four vertebra with eight pedicles in each subgroup). A pilot hole was prepared in advance using the same method in all samples. Type A and type B pedicle screws were directly inserted into vertebrae in Groups A and B, respectively, and then different volumes of PMMA (0, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mL) were injected through the screws and into vertebrae in Subgroups 0, 1, 2, and 3. The pilot holes were filled with different volumes of PMMA (0, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mL), and then the screws were inserted in Groups C0, C1, C2, and C3. Screw position and distribution of PMMA were evaluated radiographically, and axial pullout tests were performed to measure maximum axial pullout strength (Fmax). RESULTS: Polymethylmethacrylate surrounded the anterior one-third of screws in the vertebral body in Groups A1, A2, and A3; the middle one-third of screws in the junction area of the vertebral body and the pedicle in Groups B1, B2, and B3; and the full length of screws evenly in both the vertebral body and the pedicle in Groups C1, C2, and C3. There was no malpositioning of screws or leakage of PMMA in any sample. Two-way analysis of variance revealed that two factors-distribution and volume of PMMA-significantly influenced Fmax (p<.05) but that they were not significantly correlated (p=.088). Fmax values in groups using augmentation with PMMA values significantly improved compared with those in groups without PMMA (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Polymethylmethacrylate can significantly enhance the stability of different injectable pedicle screws in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, and screw stability is significantly correlated with the distribution pattern and the injected volume of PMMA. The closer the PMMA to the pedicle and the greater the quantity of injected PMMA, the greater is the pedicle screw stability. Injection of 2.0 mL of PMMA through screws with four lateral 180° holes or of 1.0 mL of PMMA through screws with six lateral 180° holes increases the stability of pedicle screws.

Effect on pedicle screw stability of polymethylmethacrylate volume and distribution in synthetic bone block for patients with osteoporosis / 解放军医学杂志

Objective To compare the stability of injectable pedicle screw with different lateral holes augmented with different volume of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in synthetic bone block used for patients with osteoporosis,and analyze the relationship between screw stability and injected volume and distribution pattern of PMMA.Methods The synthetic bone blocks used for patients with osteoporosis were randomly divided into groups A,B,C and D according to the screw difference,and the blocks in each group were then randomly divided again into subgroups 0,1,2 and 3 according to the difference of PMMA volume.A pilot hole was prepared in advance using the same method in all samples.Pedicle screws of type A-C were directly inserted into vertebrae of groups A-C respectively,and then different volumes of PMMA (0,1.0,1.5 and 2.0ml) were injected through screw into the blocks of subgroups 0,1,2 and 3 respectively.The pilot hole was filled with different volumes of PMMA (0,1.0,1.5 and 2.0ml) followed by insertion of screw in groups D0,D1,D2 and D3 respectively.X-ray examination was performed to evaluate the screw position and PMMA distribution,and axial pull-out test was performed to measure the maximum axial pullout strength (Fmax).Results X-ray examination revealed that PMMA wrapt the anterior 1/3 part of screw in groups A1-A3,wrapt the middle 1/3 part of screw in groups B1-B3 and groups C1-C3,and evenly wrapt the full length of screw in groups D1-D3.Two factor ANOVA showed that both volume and distribution of PMMA significantly influenced Fmax (P＜0.05),but no marked interaction existed between the two factors (P=0.877).Among groups with the same screw,no significant difference of Fmax was found between the groups injected of 1.0ml and 1.5ml PMMA and those of 1.5ml and 2.0ml PMMA (P＞0.05),but the Fmax was significantly higher in groups with injection of 2.0ml PMMA than that in groups with injection of 1.0ml PMMA (P＜0.05).Among the groups injected with same volume of PMMA,no significant differences on Fmax were found among the groups A0-D0,A2-D2 and A3-D3 (P＞0.05).The Fmax was significantly lower in group A1 than in group DI (P=0.026),and no significant differences existed between the other two groups injected with the same volume of PMMA (P＞0.05).Conclusion PMMA can significantly enhance the stability of different injectable pedicle screws in synthetic bone block used for patients with osteoporosis,and the stability is significantly correlated with injected volume and distribution pattern of PMMA.

Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is widely used for pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporosis. Intriguingly, there have been no biomechanical comparisons of the stability of pedicle screws augmented with different volumes of PMMA or studies of the relationship between screw stability and volume of PMMA, especially in different degrees of osteoporosis. PURPOSE: The purposes of the study reported here were to compare screw stability by different volumes of PMMA augmentation, to analyze the relationship between screw stability and PMMA volume, and to make a preliminary determination of the optimum volume of PMMA augmentation for different degrees of osteoporosis. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws augmented with various volumes of PMMA in cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. METHODS: Thirty-six pedicles from 18 osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into groups A0 through A5, and 36 pedicles from 18 severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae were randomly divided into groups B0 through B5. A different volume of PMMA was injected into each one of groups A0 through A5 (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mL, respectively) and into each one of groups B0 through B5 (0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mL, respectively), and then pedicle screws were inserted in all vertebrae. After complete solidification of the PMMA, we examined pedicle X-rays, performed axial pullout tests, and determined the maximum axial pullout strength (Fmax) for all samples. RESULTS: No PMMA was found around the screws in groups A0 and B0. In groups A1 to A5 and B1 to B5, screws were wrapped by gradually increasing amounts of PMMA. There was no PMMA leakage or screw malpositioning in any samples. The Fmax in groups A1 through A5 increased by 32.40%, 64.42%, 116.02%, 174.07%, and 207.42%, respectively, compared with that in group A0. There were no significant differences in Fmax between groups A0 and A1, A1 and A2, A2 and A3, A3 and A4, and A4 and A5 (p>.05), but there were significant differences in Fmax between any other two groups (p<.05). The Fmax in groups B1 through B5 increased by 23.48%, 48.40%, 106.60%, 134.73%, and 210.04%, respectively, compared with that in group B0. There were no significant differences in Fmax between groups B0 and B1, B0 and B2, B1 and B2, B2 and B3, B3 and B4 (p>.05), but there were significant differences in Fmax between any other two groups (p<.05). There was a significant positive correlation between Fmax and volume of PMMA in both osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Polymethylmethacrylate can significantly enhance stability of pedicle screws in both osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae. There is a significant positive correlation between screw stability and volume of PMMA. Within a certain range, nevertheless, increasing the volume of PMMA does not significantly improve screw stability. We suggest that 1.5 and 3 mL, respectively, are the volumes of injected PMMA that will optimize pedicle screw stability in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.