What Surrogates Understand (and Don't Understand) About Patients' Wishes After Engaging Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The goal of advance care planning (ACP) is to improve end-of-life decision-making for patients and their spokespersons, but multiple studies have failed to show substantial or consistent benefit from ACP. Understanding how and why ACP under-performs in the setting of complex medical decision-making is key to optimizing current, or designing new, ACP interventions. AIM: To explore how ACP did or did not contribute to a spokespersons' understanding of patient wishes after engaging in ACP. DESIGN: Thematic analysis of 200 purposively sampled interviews from a randomized control trial of an ACP decision aid. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: 200 dyads consisting of patients 18 years or older with advanced serious illness and their spokesperson at 2 tertiary care centers in Hershey, PA and Boston, MA. Participants were interviewed 1 month after completing ACP. RESULTS: ACP helped participants: 1) express clear end-of-life wishes, 2) clarify values, and 3) recognize challenges associated with applying those wishes in complex situations. Shortcomings of ACP included 1) unknown prognostic information or quality-of-life outcomes to inform decision-making, 2) skepticism about patients' wishes, and 3) complicated emotions impacting end-of-life discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Helping patients and their spokespersons better anticipate decision-making in the face of prognostic and informational uncertainty as well as the emotional complexities of making medical decisions may improve the efficacy of ACP interventions.

Questioning Capacity in an Elderly Jamaican Man with Terminal Cancer Exhibiting Near-Death Awareness: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Background: Near-death awareness (NDA) refers to visions and dreams commonly experienced by terminally ill individuals within months to hours before death. Methods: A case report of a 68-year-old Jamaican male diagnosed with advanced cholangiocarcinoma, who experienced visions of his deceased mother during hospitalization. Results: This article discusses how to differentiate NDA from delirium, core components for determining decisional capacity, and how clinicians can use a cultural guide to optimize patient-centered care. Conclusion: Improved recognition of NDA may promote cultural humility/competency and help to differentiate NDA from an underlying medical/psychiatric condition. It may assist the clinician in understanding the significance of NDA and the comfort and meaning these experiences may hold for both the individual and their family.

Erdheim-Chester Disease With Concurrent Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare type of blood cancer characterized by infiltration of the body tissues by pathologic histiocytes, leading to widespread inflammation and damage. Clinical presentations range widely, from asymptomatic infiltration of bone to multiple organ system damage and resultant dysfunction. This report describes a case of a patient with several unusual imaging findings that led to a differential diagnosis of ECD; however, a biopsy of a mediastinal mass suspected to be due to histiocyte infiltration instead revealed primary lung cancer. Ultimately, ECD could not be ruled out, and the patient was referred to dermatology for a superficial facial xanthelasma biopsy, results of which were consistent with ECD. Concurrent ECD and adenocarcinoma is highly unusual; this case demonstrates the importance of a thorough investigation and the consideration that not all findings may be attributable to a single disease process, even when the alternative is very unlikely.

On the data to know the prioritization and vulnerability of patients on surgical waiting lists.

The data presented in this article are complementary material to our work entitled "A decision support system for prioritization of patients on surgical waiting lists: A biopsychosocial approach". We prepared, together with physicians, a survey was used in the otorhinolaryngology unit of the Hospital of Talca for a period of five months, between February 05, 2018 and June 29, 2018. Two hundred and five surveys were collected through 20 biopsychosocial criteria, which allowed measuring the priority and vulnerability of patients on the surgical waiting list. The data allow choosing and preparing patients for surgery according to both a dynamic score and a vulnerability level.

Opinions of Argentinean neonatologists on the initiation of life-sustaining treatment in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: In June 2014, the Argentinean Ministry of Health published guidelines for the management of neonates born at the limit of viability (≤25 weeks of gestation). We explored the opinion of neonatologists in Buenos Aires, Argentina, regarding the initiation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) in critically ill neonates, focusing on the effect of sociocultural factors on their opinion. METHODS: An anonymous survey was designed to explore the opinions of Argentinean neonatologists on whether or not to initiate LST in newborns born prematurely. Five hundred eighty neonatologists from 36 neonatal units were invited to participate, and 315 specialists from 34 neonatal units completed the survey (response rate 54%). The survey was conducted between June 2014 and February 2015. RESULTS: 9.5% (30/315) of the neonatologists answered they would begin LST on neonates born at 22 weeks, 42.5% (134/315) at 23 weeks, 37% (117/315) at 24 weeks, 7% (22/315) at 25 weeks, and 4% (12/315) at ≥26 weeks. Cumulatively then, 96% of participants stated they would start LST at 25 weeks of gestation or less. On multivariate analysis, a "transcendent" value of life and lack of consideration of the local legal framework for making medical decisions in the delivery room were statistically associated with an opinion in favor of initiation of LST in neonates born at the limit of viability. More than 50% of the Argentinean neonatologists surveyed answered they would initiate treatment at a gestational age of less than 23 weeks, despite the fact that the recommendations of the Argentinean Ministry of Health are to only give comfort care for these neonates. The opinion of most Argentinean neonatologists surveyed thus differs from that recommended by the guidelines of Argentina. CONCLUSION: The most frequent opinion of Argentinean neonatologists was to initiate LST in neonates at the limit of viability. Certain factors, in particular the sense of a transcendent meaning to life and lack of consideration of the local legal framework for making medical decisions in the delivery room, seem to influence the decision to start LST.

Ethical dilemmas associated with clinicians' decisions about treatment in critically ill infants born in Córdoba, Argentina.

The objective of this article is to examine end of life decisions made by neonatologists of Córdoba, Argentina. An anonymous questionnaire was designed to investigate neonatologists' decisions on when to initiate or withdraw treatment in critical neonates. All neonatologists who take care of critically ill neonates in Córdoba participated in the survey. More than 75% of them would initiate treatment in preterm infants with uncertain prognosis based on the viability of the newborn. Because it is common to find that critically ill neonates lack sufficient diagnostic information at birth, this attitude seems to manifest a certain therapeutic activism. However, more than 80% of physicians withdraw futile treatments that do not produce benefits. Cordoban neonatologists initiate medical treatment based on the current clinical conditions of neonates, applying a certain degree of therapeutic activism. Doctors withdraw neonatal treatment when it is considered futile.

A Statistical Classifier to Support Diagnose Meningitis in Less Developed Areas of Brazil.

This paper describes the development of statistical classifiers to help diagnose meningococcal meningitis, i.e. the most sever, infectious and deadliest type of this disease. The goal is to find a mechanism able to determine whether a patient has this type of meningitis from a set of symptoms that can be directly observed in the earliest stages of this pathology. Currently, in Brazil, a country that is heavily affected by meningitis, all suspected cases require immediate hospitalization and the beginning of a treatment with invasive tests and medicines. This procedure, therefore, entails expensive treatments unaffordable in less developed regions. For this purpose, we have gathered together a dataset of 22,602 records of suspected meningitis cases from the Brazilian state of Bahia. Seven classification techniques have been applied from input data of nine symptoms and other information about the patient such as age, sex and the area they live in, and a 10 cross-fold validation has been performed. Results show that the techniques applied are suitable for diagnosing the meningococcal meningitis. Several indexes, such as precision, recall or ROC area, have been computed to show the accuracy of the models. All of them provide good results, but the best corresponds to the J48 classifier with a precision of 0.942 and a ROC area over 0.95. These results indicate that our model can indeed help lead to a non-invasive and early diagnosis of this pathology. This is especially useful in less developed areas, where the epidemiologic risk is usually high and medical expenses, sometimes, unaffordable.

Habilidades numéricas y salud: una revisión crítica / Numeracy and health: A critical review

A la hora de realizar juicios y tomar decisiones sobre la salud, debemos procesar y comprender información numérica. Por ejemplo, habitualmente recibimos información sobre el riesgo de padecer una enfermedad en probabilidades, porcentajes o fracciones. Sin embargo, muchas personas presentan deficiencias a la hora de comprender esta información. En este trabajo, presentamos una revisión crítica de la evidencia empírica sobre los efectos que tienen las habilidades numéricas en diversos aspectos del proceso que acontece cuando un paciente acude al médico, más concretamente en la percepción de los riesgos médicos y la eficacia de los tratamientos. También describimos los distintos marcos teóricos que pretenden explicar estos efectos y resaltamos algunas de sus limitaciones. Por último, discutimos las ventajas y los inconvenientes de los instrumentos de medida de las habilidades numéricas, y destacamos entre ellos el Berlin Numeracy Test. Concluimos que este test puede evaluar las habilidades numéricas satisfactoriamente en diversos contextos, y planteamos diversas cuestiones que permanecen abiertas, como la relación entre las habilidades numéricas y diversos constructos psicológicos como la inteligencia o la reflexión cognitiva.

When we make judgments and decisions about our health, we are frequently faced with numerical information. For example, we often receive information concerning the risk of suffering an illness in terms of probabilities, percentages or fractions. However, many people have difficulties in understanding this type of information. In this paper, we present a critical review of the existing empirical evidence that documents the influence of numeracy on various aspects of the process that occurs when patients visit their doctor, focusing on perceptions of medical risks and treatment efficacy. We also outline different theoretical frameworks that have attempted to explain the impact of numeracy, highlighting some of their limitations. Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing tools for measuring numeracy, drawing attention to the Berlin Numeracy Test. We concluded that this test can satisfactorily assess numeracy in a wide range of contexts. We also discuss a number of open questions, including the relationship between numeracy and other psychological constructs, such as intelligence or cognitive reflection.