Has China's hierarchical medical system improved doctor-patient relationships?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Developing harmonious doctor-patient relationships is a powerful way to promote the construction of a new pattern of medical reform in developing countries. We aim to analyze the effects of China's hierarchical medical system on doctor-patient relationships, thus contributing to China's medical and health system reform. METHODS: With panel data on prefectural-level cities in China from 2012 to 2019, we used a time-varying difference-in-differences model to evaluate the effect of hierarchical medical treatment policy. RESULTS: Hierarchical medical treatment policies can significantly improve doctor-patient relationships, and this conclusion is supported by various robustness tests. And improving doctor-patient relationships can be indirectly realized by the optimization of resource allocation and saving of medical costs. In addition, the marginal effect of the pilot policy on doctor-patient relationships decreased with age within the city population. In focal cities and cities with high levels of fiscal spending on health care, the effect of the pilot policy on doctor-patient relationships was stronger. CONCLUSION: While reinforcing the literature on the doctor-patient relationship, this study also provides a reference for further exploration of the pilot policy of hierarchical medical treatment and the development of new medical and health system reform in developing countries.

The impact of the implementation of hierarchical medical system on population health: evidence from China.

Introduction: The implementation of a hierarchical medical system holds significant practical importance in advancing the Healthy China strategy and elevating the overall health status of the population of China. Methods: This article empirically examines the influence of the implementation of a hierarchical medical system on the health of the population using the latest 2020 China Family Panel Studies database. Furthermore, it investigates the variability of this impact across distinct health insurance participation statuses and literacy groups. Results: The findings of the study demonstrate that the implementation of the hierarchical medical system substantially enhances the health of the population, not only in terms of self-assessed health but also through a notable positive effect on alleviating chronic diseases. These results maintain their validity even after conducting robustness tests utilizing a replacement estimation model. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the impact of the hierarchical medical system on the population's health status exhibits significant variation concerning health insurance participation and literacy. Specifically, regarding health insurance participation, the hierarchical medical system effectively improves both self-assessed health and chronic disease status among the insured population. However, for those not enrolled in health insurance, the hierarchical medical system only demonstrates improvement in chronic disease status, with insignificant results observed in enhancing self-assessed health status. Moreover, propensity score matching (PSM) was also used to address endogeneity problems resulting from sample selectivity bias. The findings demonstrate that endogeneity issues can be suitably addressed by the PSM model. Additionally, they point out that an overestimation of the impact of the hierarchical medical system on the population's self-assessed health state would result from failing to take sample selectivity bias into account. On the other hand, it will lead to the underestimation of the effect of the hierarchical medical system on the status of chronic diseases. Discussion: Moving forward, steadfast efforts should be directed toward further enhancing the implementation of the hierarchical medical system. This includes the comprehensive promotion and using the pivotal role of the hierarchical medical system in improving the health of the population.

Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a hilly area: Utstein Registry data from the Nagasaki Medical Region, Japan.

Aim: To analyze characteristics and investigate prognostic indicators of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a hilly area in Japan. Methods: A retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Utstein Registry for 4280 OHCA patients in the Nagasaki Medical Region (NMR) registered over the 10-year period from 2011 to 2020. The main outcome measure was a favorable cerebral performance category (CPC 1-2). Sites at which OHCA occurred were classified into "sloped places (SPs)" (not easily accessible by emergency medical services [EMS] personnel due to slopes) and "accessible places (APs)" (EMS personnel could park an ambulance close to the site). The characteristics and prognosis based on CPC were compared between SPs and APs, and multivariable analysis was performed. Results: No significant improvement in prognosis occurred in the NMR from 2011 to 2020. Prognosis in SPs was significantly worse than that in APs. However, multivariable analysis did not identify SP as a prognostic indicator. The following factors were associated with survival and CPC 1-2: age group, witness status, first documented rhythm, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, use of mechanical CPR (m-CPR) device or esophageal obturator airway (EOA), and year. Both m-CPR and EOA use were associated with a poor prognosis. Conclusion: In a hilly area, OHCA patients in SPs had a worse prognosis than those in APs, but SPs was not significantly associated with prognosis by multivariable analysis. Interventions to increase bystander-initiated CPR and AED use could potentially improve outcomes of OHCA in the NMR.

Healthcare preferences of chronic disease patients under China's hierarchical medical system: an empirical study of Tianjin's reform practice.

To alleviate the contradiction in healthcare resources, the Chinese government formally established the framework of a hierarchical medical system in 2015, which contains the following brief generalities: " separate treatment of emergencies and slows, first-contact care at the primary, two-way referral, and upper and lower linkage, ". This study systematically summarizes and models the connotations of China's hierarchical medical system and a sample of 11,200 chronic disease patients in Tianjin, the largest port city in northern China, was selected for the empirical study to investigate the relationship between chronic disease patients' policy perceptions of the hierarchical medical system and their preference for healthcare. We found that under the strategy of separate treatment, improving the healthcare accessibility, drug supply, and lowering the cost of medical care would have a positive impact on increasing the preference of patients with chronic diseases to go to the primary hospitals. Under the two-way triage strategy, improving the level of physician services, referral convenience and treatment Standards have a positive impact on chronic disease patients' preference for primary care; The impact of the hierarchical medical system on the preference for healthcare differed between groups, focusing on differences in health literacy level, age and household type; The role of " upper and lower linkage " is crucial in the hierarchical medical system and it plays a part in mediating the influence of the " separate treatment of emergencies and slows" design and the "two-way referral " order on the treatment preferences of chronic disease patients. The results of the study provide a reference for the further development of a scientific and rational hierarchical medical system in the future.

Effectiveness of hierarchical medical system and economic growth: based on China's urban vs. rural health perspectives.

Background: The hierarchical medical system is an important measure to promote equitable healthcare and sustain economic development. As the population's consumption level rises, the demand for healthcare services also increases. Based on urban and rural perspectives in China, this study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the hierarchical medical system and its relationship with economic development in China. Materials and methods: The study analyses panel data collected from Chinese government authorities, covering the period from 2009 to 2022. According to China's regional development policy, China is divided into the following regions: Eastern, Middle, Western, and Northeastern. Urban and rural component factors were downscaled using principal component analysis (PCA). The factor score formula combined with Urban-rural disparity rate (ΔD) were utilized to construct models for evaluating the effectiveness of the hierarchical medical system from an urban-rural perspective. A Vector Autoregression model is then constructed to analyze the dynamic relationship between the effects of the hierarchical medical system and economic growth, and to predict potential future changes. Results: Three principal factors were extracted. The contributions of the three principal factors were 38.132, 27.662, and 23.028%. In 2021, the hierarchical medical systems worked well in Henan (F = 47245.887), Shandong (F = 45999.640), and Guangdong (F = 42856.163). The Northeast (ΔDmax = 18.77%) and Eastern region (ΔDmax = 26.04%) had smaller disparities than the Middle (ΔDmax = 49.25%) and Western region (ΔDmax = 56.70%). Vector autoregression model reveals a long-term cointegration relationship between economic development and the healthcare burden for both urban and rural residents (ßurban = 3.09, ßrural = 3.66), as well as the number of individuals receiving health education (ß = -0.3492). Both the Granger causality test and impulse response analysis validate the existence of a substantial time lag between the impact of the hierarchical medical system and economic growth. Conclusion: Residents in urban areas are more affected by economic factors, while those in rural areas are more influenced by time considerations. The urban rural disparity in the hierarchical medical system is associated with the level of economic development of the region. When formulating policies for economically relevant hierarchical medical systems, it is important to consider the impact of longer lags.

Centralization as the key survival benefit in acute neonatal surgery.

Introduction: Centralization of neonatal surgical care for congenital malformations is already under discussion. Acute care of neonatal emergencies in perinatal centers with affiliated hospitals is not uniformly regulated in Germany. Materials and methods: Analyses are based on acute pediatric surgical care at four affiliated hospitals of a perinatal center. Epidemiologic data and outcome parameters "survival", "intracerebral hemorrhage", and "revision of surgical indication" are assessed. Comparison is made between patients receiving surgical treatment at affiliated hospitals (group A) and patients with transfer to the university center for therapy in case of surgical indication for gastrointestinal diseases (group B). Results: 17 group A-patients are compared to 40 group B-patients. Comparison of epidemiological data reveals no significant differences. There is a survival advantage with transfer to the university center (mortality of 29% in group A vs. 2% in group B, p = 0.007). Intracerebral hemorrhage occurred more frequently in externally treated patients (group A 24% vs. group B 2%, p = 0.024). Surgical indication was revised in 30% of group B at the university center (p = 0.011) with consecutive successful conservative treatment. Conclusion: Transfer of patients at the beginning of the acute phase of gastrointestinal diseases is key to optimize the quality of neonatal surgical care. However, larger population studies should confirm the presented results, discuss restricting factors of real care structures and should rule out bias in triage of patients.

Factors influencing contracting of residents with family doctors in China: a national cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Family doctor contract services (FDCS) have been introduced in China in 2009 [1] and rapidly expanded recently. This study sought to investigate factors that influenced the willingness of Chinese residents to use FDCS. METHODS: We employed multistage stratified and convenience sampling to administer questionnaires to 1455 Beijing, Qinghai, and Fujian residents. The willingness of residents in each province to contract family doctors was analyzed using the chi-square test and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The analysis in this study found that the signing rate of family doctors in China was about 27.77%, with differences in the signing up levels in Beijing (13.68%), Fujian (64.49%) and Qinghai (11.22%). In addition, the binary logistic regression results emphasized the relative importance of age, education, medical preference and policy knowledge on the willingness to sign up. Distrust of family doctors' medical skills (65.7%), not knowing how to contract (47.8%), and not knowing what medical problems can be solved (41.1%) were the top three reasons accounting for the reluctance of residents to contract with family doctors. CONCLUSION: Residents from different backgrounds have different willingness to sign up, so the specific circumstances and needs of different groups should be taken into account. In order to increase the signing-up rate, consideration can be given to promoting the family doctor model in Fujian throughout the country. Individual hesitation can be eliminated by increasing the reimbursement rate of health insurance, reducing the out-of-pocket expenses of contracted patients, and providing incentives of certain discounts for consecutive contracted patients.

Knowledge, attitude, and utilization of traditional medicine within the plural medical system in West Java, Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: The concept of 'medical pluralism' has become more popular among scholars in applied health science and prevalent in societies where one medical system alone cannot adequately meet the health care needs of the entire population. METHODS: The data collection is focused on the knowledge-belief-practice and the utilization of three medical systems in Kabupaten Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Participants were purposively selected from households with at least one member experienced one of the listed diseases in the questionnaire. The extensive survey using a structured questionnaire has been undertaken to collect data on people's health care utilization behaviour. The dataset is further analyzed using multivariate analysis through non-canonical correlation, with the analytical data provided by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: With regards to the total utilization by patients, the traditional medical system presents as the dominant medical system in the research area, accounting for 59.3% (n = 419) of total utilization, followed by the modern medical system (33.0%, n = 233), and transitional medical system (7.7%, n = 54). This study identified that village category, illness, illness duration, occupation, belief in traditional medicine, knowledge of modern medicine, accessibility, cost, proximity to the medical service, and insurance have significant (χ2 = 0.000) relationship with the utilization of medical systems. The results of the multivariate analysis show that the block of the predisposing socio-demographic factors and the block of the predisposing psycho-social factors correlate strongly with the utilization of medical systems. CONCLUSIONS: In general, people in Kabupaten Bandung, West Java, Indonesia seeks treatment from various sources, which in the context of the medical system, consists of the traditional, transitional, and modern medical system; therefore, it adopts the patterns of transcultural health care utilization. In terms of the knowledge, beliefs, and practices of traditional medicine in West Java, the inhabitants of the five research villages were commonly familiar with medicinal plants and speak profoundly about their knowledge of traditional medicine, which in the research area is perceived as accessible, efficacious, affordable and culturally appropriate with Sundanese community.

Experiences of Spanish out-of-hospital emergency workers with high levels of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic had a major psychological impact on health care workers (HCWs). This study was embedded in a larger quantitative study on the mental health care of out-of-hospital HCWs in Spain. To better understand this, a qualitative study was conducted to explore the experiences, coping strategies, and influencing factors of out-of-hospital HCWs who scored high (> 25 points) on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) in a previous quantitative mental health study. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using six in-depth interviews with individuals who scored high on the depression scale and agreed to be contacted by email between May and June 2021, using the phenomenological approach. The data were analysed using Brawn and Clare's method. RESULTS: The main results findings related to four themes. The emotional impact of assuming a professional role with high self-demands and responsibilities; Factors influencing the development of negative emotions such as the cruelty of the pandemic, the helplessness in relation to health management and policy, the changing role of the professional and the relationship with society; Personal protection through coping strategies to manage negative emotions such as support from colleagues and family; Good practices for the future looking for different management strategies that can influence individuals and their personal, professional, and social relationships. CONCLUSION: The strong impact of the circumstances experienced points to the need to develop psychological support programmes that can protect people's mental health from depression during a crisis and improve the relationship between workers and their managers.

RESUMEN: ANTECEDENTES: La pandemia de COVID-19 tuvo un gran impacto psicológico en el personal sanitario. Este estudio forma parte de un estudio cuantitativo más amplio sobre la atención a la salud mental de los trabajadores sanitarios extrahospitalarios en España. Para comprenderlo mejor, se llevó a cabo un estudio cualitativo para explorar las experiencias, estrategias de afrontamiento y factores de influencia de los trabajadores extrahospitalarios que obtuvieron puntuaciones altas (> 25 puntos) en la Escala de Depresión, Ansiedad y Estrés (DASS-21) en un estudio cuantitativo previo sobre salud mental. MéTODOS: Se realizó un estudio cualitativo mediante seis entrevistas en profundidad con individuos que puntuaron alto en la escala de depresión y aceptaron ser contactados por correo electrónico entre mayo y junio de 2021, utilizando el enfoque fenomenológico. Los datos se analizaron utilizando el método de Brawn y Clare. RESULTADOS: Los principales hallazgos de los resultados se relacionaron con cuatro temas. El impacto emocional de asumir un rol profesional con altas autoexigencias y responsabilidades; Factores que influyen en el desarrollo de emociones negativas como la crueldad de la pandemia, la impotencia en relación con la gestión y la política sanitaria, el papel cambiante del profesional y la relación con la sociedad; Protección personal a través de estrategias de afrontamiento para gestionar las emociones negativas como el apoyo de los compañeros y la familia; Buenas prácticas para el futuro buscando diferentes estrategias de gestión que puedan influir en los individuos y en sus relaciones personales, profesionales y sociales. CONCLUSIóN: El fuerte impacto de las circunstancias vividas apunta a la necesidad de desarrollar programas de apoyo psicológico que puedan proteger la salud mental de las personas durante una crisis y mejorar la relación entre los trabajadores y sus jefes.

The nature and timing of coagulation dysfunction in a cohort of trauma patients in the Australian pre-hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy (ATC) is a complex pathological process that is associated with patient mortality and increased blood transfusion requirements. It is evident on hospital arrival, but there is a paucity of information about the nature of ATC and the characteristics of patients that develop ATC in the pre-hospital setting. The objective of this study was to describe the nature and timing of coagulation dysfunction in a cohort of injured patients and to report on patient and pre-hospital factors associated with the development of ATC in the field. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of trauma patients. Patients had blood taken during the pre-hospital phase of care and evaluated for derangements in Conventional Coagulation Assays (CCA) and Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Associations between coagulation derangement and pre-hospital factors and patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients who had either a complete CCA or ROTEM were included in the analysis. One hundred and eighty (83 %) of patients were male, with a median injury severity score of 17 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-27] and median age of 34 years [IQR = 25.0-52.0]. Hypofibrinogenemia was the predominant abnormality seen, (CCA Hypofibrinogenemia: 51/193, 26 %; ROTEM hypofibrinogenemia: 65/204, 32 %). Increased CCA derangement, the presence of ROTEM coagulopathy, worsening INR, worsening FibTEM and decreasing fibrinogen concentration, were all associated with both mortality and early massive transfusion. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant, multifaceted coagulopathy develops early in the clinical course, with hypofibrinogenemia being the predominant coagulopathy. In keeping with the ED literature, pre-hospital coagulation dysfunction was associated with mortality and early massive transfusion. Further work is required to identify strategies to identify and guide the pre-hospital management of the coagulation dysfunction seen in trauma.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadian emergency medical system management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: We sought to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care provided by Canadian emergency medical system (EMS) clinicians to patients suffering out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and whether any observed changes persisted beyond the initial phase of the pandemic. METHODS: We analysed cases of adult, non-traumatic, OHCA from the Canadian Resuscitation Outcome Consortium (CanROC) registry who were treated between January 27th, 2018, and December 31st, 2021. We used adjusted regression models and interrupted time series analysis to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (January 27th, 2020 - December 31st, 2021)on the care provided to patients with OHCA by EMS clinicians. RESULTS: There were 12,947 cases of OHCA recorded in the CanROC registry in the pre-COVID-19 period and 17,488 during the COVID-19 period. We observed a reduction in the cumulative number of defibrillations provided by EMS (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.89 - 0.93, p < 0.01), a reduction in the odds of attempts at intubation (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31 - 0.34, p < 0.01), higher rates of supraglottic airway use (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.16-1.30, p < 0.01), a reduction in vascular access (aOR for intravenous access 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 - 0.89, p < 0.01; aOR for intraosseous access 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 - 0.96, p < 0.01), a reduction in the odds of epinephrine administration (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 - 0.94, p < 0.01), and higher odds of resuscitation termination on scene (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.31 - 1.46, p < 0.01). Delays to initiation of chest compressions (2 min. vs. 3 min., p < 0.01), intubation (16 min. vs. 19 min., p = 0.01), and epinephrine administration (11 min. vs. 13 min., p < 0.01) were observed, whilst supraglottic airways were inserted earlier (11 min. vs. 10 min., p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial changes in EMS management of OHCA. EMS leaders should consider these findings to optimise current OHCA management and prepare for future pandemics.

Características clínicas en pacientes atendidos en una unidad de psiquiatría de emergencia en un hospital general de Perú

Introducción. En los últimos 10 a 20 años, la psiquiatría de emergencia ha experimentado un progreso constante en cuanto a la prestación de servicios altamente especializados y enfocados en el paciente. Este aumento global refleja desafíos en accesibilidad y calidad de atención. En el contexto peruano, la legislación de salud mental y múltiples directrices clínicas orientan la prestación de servicios, no obstante, la insuficiencia de datos representa una barrera significativa para la toma de decisiones informadas. Objetivo. Examinar y reportar las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de los pacientes evaluados en la Unidad de Psiquiatría de Emergencia del Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen (HNGAI), de Lima, Perú, y analizar la naturaleza de los cuadros sintomatológicos y sindrómicos. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo, transversal. Se estudiaron las interconsultas recibidas por la Unidad de Psiquiatría de Emergencia del HNGAI, entre julio y diciembre del 2022. Se aplicó un análisis factorial de los síntomas. Resultados. En 1037 pacientes vistos en interconsulta, la edad promedio fue 41,15 ± 23,52 años. El 65,2 % fueron mujeres. La tasa de derivación fue de 1,18 %. Los trastornos más frecuentes fueron los del humor (27,8 %); los síntomas más frecuentes fueron el afecto ansioso (47,3 %), insomnio (38,8 %) y ánimo depresivo (32,6 %). Con respecto al tratamiento, el más usado fueron los antipsicóticos (50,4 %). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los síntomas mostró siete factores o componentes sindrómicos importantes: psicótico, delirium, depresivo-suicida, obsesivo-compulsivo, negativo, apático, ansioso. Conclusión. El paciente típico de esta muestra fue mujer al inicio de su cuarta década de vida. Los trastornos del humor y los síntomas ansiosos fueron los más comunes. El análisis factorial exploratorio mostró la presencia de siete síndromes. Es necesario incrementar la recopilación sistemática de datos e inversión en investigación en psiquiatría de emergencia, todo con la finalidad de mejorar la atención que se brinda a estos pacientes.

Introduction. In the last 10 to 20 years, emergency psychiatry has undergone consistent progress in providing highly specialized and patient-focused services. This global advancement reflects challenges in accessibility and quality of care. In the Peruvian context, mental health legislation and various clinical guidelines guide service provision; however, the lack of data constitutes a significant barrier to informed decision-making. Objective. The objective of this study was to examine and report the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients evaluated at the Emergency Psychiatry Unit of the National Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen Hospital (HNGAI) in Lima, Peru, and analyze the nature of the symptomatic and syndromic profiles present. Methods. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Interconsultations received by the Emergency Psychiatry Unit of HNGAI between July and December 2022 were analyzed. A factorial analysis of symptoms was conducted. Results. Out of a total of 1037 patients seen in interconsultation, the mean age was 41.15 ± 23.52 years. 65.2% of the patients were female. The referral rate was 1.18%. Mood disorders (27.8%) were the most frequent diagnoses, with anxious affect (47.3%), insomnia (38.8%), and depressive mood (32.6%) being the most common symptoms. Antipsychotics (50.4%) were the most used treatment modality. Exploratory factor analysis of symptoms revealed the presence of seven important syndromic factors: psychotic, delirium, depressive-suicidal, obsessive-compulsive, negative, apathetic, and anxious. Conclusion. The typical patient in this sample was a female in the early forties. Mood disorders and anxious symptoms were the most prevalent. Exploratory factor analysis identified the presence of seven syndromes. There is a need to increase systematic data collection and investment in emergency psychiatry research to enhance the care provided to these patients.

Revolutionizing Patient Monitoring in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Study on the Necessity and Efficiency of the AMD VIEWER.

(1) Background: Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is a critical condition leading to blindness, necessitating lifelong clinic visits for management, albeit with existing challenges in monitoring its long-term progression. This study introduced and assessed an innovative tool, the AMD long-term Information Viewer (AMD VIEWER), designed to offer a comprehensive display of crucial medical data-including visual acuity, central retinal thickness, macular volume, vitreous injection treatment history, and Optical Coherent Tomography (OCT) images-across an individual eye's entire treatment course. (2) Methods: By analyzing visit frequencies of patients with a history of invasive AMD treatment, a comparative examination between a Dropout group and an Active group underscored the clinical importance of regular visits, particularly highlighting better treatment outcomes and maintained visual acuity in the Active group. (3) Results: The efficiency of AMD VIEWER was proven by comparing it to manual data input by optometrists, showing significantly faster data display with no errors, unlike the time-consuming and error-prone manual entries. Furthermore, an elicited Net Promoter Score (NPS) of 70 from 10 ophthalmologists strongly endorsed AMD VIEWER's practical utility. (4) Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of regular clinic visits for AMD patients. It suggests the AMD VIEWER as an effective tool for improving treatment data management and display.

[e-MUST Registry - Evaluation of prehospital medical management of STEMI in Île-de-France]. / Registre e-MUST - Évaluation de la prise en charge médicale préhospitalière du SCA ST+ en Île-de-France.

The e-MUST registry has continuously and comprehensively documented ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) managed in the prehospital setting by the 39 Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Services (SMUR) of the 8 Emergency Medical Assistance System (SAMU) and subsequently managed in the 36 interventional cardiology services in Île-de-France since 2000. This encompasses a population of over 12 million residents. To date, nearly 44,000 patients have been enrolled. The analysis of these findings reflects the real-world management of these patients and the evolution of their care. The results are shared annually with the investigators' teams and have led to around twenty publications. The latest acquired results have demonstrated, in a series of over 630 patients aged over 90, that nonagenarians particularly benefit from prehospital coronary reperfusion decisions, resulting in a nearly 60% reduction in mortality.

Small money, big change: The distributional impact of differentiated doctor's visit fee on healthcare utilization.

A prominent issue in China's healthcare sector is the overcrowding of high-tier hospitals, whereas low-tier hospitals and community health centers are severely underutilized. This study aims to examine whether doctor's visit fee and copay differentiated by the level of healthcare providers can change the distribution of outpatient visits across different levels of healthcare providers. By leveraging the exogeneity of the policy change implemented in a megacity in China in 2017, we apply a parametric discontinuity regression model to study the causal impact of differentiated pricing on patients' health-seeking behavior, using a large-scale insurance claim database. We find that the reform of differentiated doctor's visit fee schedule effectively increases the proportion of visits to primary care facilities among all outpatient visits. This effect is driven by a decline in visits to the highest-tier hospitals and an increase in visits to community healthcare centers. Furthermore, the policy effects are more pronounced among the elderly and people with chronic diseases. Our results suggest that shifting the focus of pricing policies from coinsurance to copays while continuing to improve the capacity of primary care facilities is an effective way to facilitate triaging patients into different levels of care without triggering moral hazard.

Geographic Disparity in Distance to Trauma Care in Secondary Schools across the United States.

CONTEXT: Geographic disparities exist in trauma care (i.e., "trauma center desert") within the United States. An athletic trainer (AT) on-site at secondary schools (SSs) may help enhance collaboration with emergency medical systems and potentially lead to better outcomes following catastrophic injuries. However, access to AT services relative to the location of Level I or II (i.e., tertiary) trauma centers remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To visualize and describe SSs distance to trauma centers and compare access to AT services across the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Public and private secondary schools with interscholastic athletics program in the United States. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Survey data obtained through the Athletic Training Locations and Services (ATLAS) project database between September 2019 and April 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The minimum distance from each SS to tertiary trauma centers was calculated on Tableau Desktop by geocoding with longitude and latitude. The status and level of AT employment were obtained from ATLAS project database. The odds and percentage of access to AT services were examined by distance ranges. RESULTS: A total of 18,244 SSs were included in the analyses. Seventy-five percent of SSs (n=13,613) were located within 50 miles from tertiary trauma center. The odds of access to AT services were 2.74 [CI: 2.56-2.93] times greater in SSs located within 50 miles from tertiary trauma center (P<0.001). Additionally, SSs located > 60 miles from tertiary trauma center have decreased access to AT services (R2= 0.9192). CONCLUSION: This study highlights geographic disparity in distance to trauma care for SSs in the United States. SSs located > 60 miles from trauma centers were at reduced odds of access to AT services. Identification of geographic trends of AT services relative to the location of tertiary trauma centers is a critical first step to prevent fatal consequences of catastrophic injuries.

The end-of-life needs of Aboriginal and immigrant communities: a challenge to conventional medical models.

Introduction: Concerns have been raised internationally about the palliative care needs of migrants and First Nations people. This article presents insights from research investigating the end-of-life needs of Aboriginal and culturally and linguistically diverse people living in Western Sydney, Australia. This region has a large rapidly growing, and highly diverse population and on average low socioeconomic status. The research was guided by an advisory panel made up of representatives of supportive and palliative medicine, bereavement support, Aboriginal health, and multicultural health facilities. It aimed to generate findings to support the delivery of culturally sensitive services in the public health system. Method: The multi-method design and the conduct of the research were informed by the literature on researching with marginalized groups which highlights the ethical considerations needed to avoid replicating past injustices. Qualitative data was generated from key informants and community focus groups. Results: The analysis revealed seven themes and some suggested solutions which were relevant across several themes. The seven themes were: the Need for trusted relationships; Talking about death and dying; Knowledge of key services; Decision-making and obtaining consent from the patient; Appropriate physical spaces; Cultural practices around EOL; and Language barriers. Discussion: Within each theme a variety of cultural beliefs and practices were revealed that conflicted with mainstream medical systems, indicating the need for changes in such systems. 'Compassionate Communities' was identified as a model to support the necessary changes.

A Multisite Investigation of Areas for Improvement in COVID-19 Surge Capacity Management.

The congressionally authorized National Disaster Medical System Pilot Program was created in December 2019 to strengthen the medical surge capability, capacity, and interoperability of affiliated healthcare facilities in 5 regions across the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic provided an unprecedented opportunity to learn how participating healthcare facilities handled medical surge events during an active public health emergency. We applied a modified version of the Barbisch and Koenig 4-S framework (staff, stuff, space, systems) to analyze COVID-19 surge management practices implemented by healthcare stakeholders at 5 pilot sites. In total, 32 notable practices were identified to increase surge capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic that have potential applications for other healthcare facilities. We found that systems was the most prevalent domain of surge capacity among the identified practices. Systems and staff were discussed across all 5 pilot sites and were the 2 domains co-occurring most often within each surge management practice. These results can inform strategies for scaling up and optimizing medical surge capability, capacity, and interoperability of healthcare facilities nationwide. This study also specifies areas of surge capacity worthy of strategic focus in the pilot's planning and implementation efforts while more broadly informing the US healthcare system's response to future large-scale, medical surge events.

The effect of recognition on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and implications for biosensor technologies.

BACKGROUND: Biosensor technologies have been proposed as a solution to provide recognition and facilitate earlier responses to unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. We sought to estimate the effect of recognition on survival and modelled the potential incremental impact of increased recognition of unwitnessed cases on survival to hospital discharge, to demonstrate the potential benefit of biosensor technologies. METHODS: We included cases from the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry (2019-2020), which includes Emergency Medical Services (EMS)-assessed OHCAs. We excluded cases that would not have benefitted from early recognition (EMS-witnessed, terminal illness, or do-not-resuscitate). Using a mediation analysis, we estimated the relative benefits on survival of a witness recognizing vs. intervening in an OHCA; and estimated the expected additional number of survivors resulting from increasing recognition alone using a bootstrap logistic regression framework. RESULTS: Of 13,655 EMS-assessed cases, 11,412 were included (6314 EMS-treated, 5098 EMS-untreated). Survival to hospital discharge was 191/8879 (2.2%) in unwitnessed cases and 429/2533 (17%) in bystander-witnessed cases. Of the total effect attributable to a bystander witness, recognition accounted for 84% (95% CI: 72, 86) of the benefit. If all previously unwitnessed cases had been bystander witnessed, we would expect 1198 additional survivors. If these cases had been recognized, but no interventions performed, we would expect 912 additional survivors. CONCLUSION: Unwitnessed OHCA account for the majority of OHCAs, yet survival is dismal. Methods to improve recognition, such as with biosensor technologies, may lead to substantial improvements in overall survival.

Validation of Opportunities to Strengthen the National Disaster Medical System: The Military-Civilian NDMS Interoperability Study Quantitative Step.

The National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) Pilot Program was authorized by Congress to improve the interoperability, capabilities, and capacity of the NDMS. To develop a roadmap for planning and research, the mixed methods Military-Civilian NDMS Interoperability Study (MCNIS) was conducted in 2020-2021. The initial qualitative phase of the study identified critical themes for improvement: (1) coordination, collaboration, and communication; (2) funding and incentives to increase private sector preparedness; (3) staffing capacity and competencies; (4) clinical and support surge capacity; (5) training, education, and exercises between federal and private sector partners; and (6) metrics, benchmarks, and modeling to track NDMS performance. These qualitative findings were subsequently refined, validated, and prioritized through a quantitative survey. Expert respondents ranked 64 statements based on weaknesses and opportunities identified during the qualitative phase. Data were collected using Likert scales, and multivariate proportions and confidence intervals were estimated to compare and prioritize each statement's level of support. Pairwise tests were conducted for each item-to-item pair to determine statistically significant differences. The survey results corroborated the earlier qualitative findings, with all weaknesses and opportunities ranked as important by a majority of respondents. Survey results also pointed to specific priorities for interventions within the 6 previously identified themes. As with the qualitative study, the survey found that the most common weaknesses and opportunities were related to coordination, collaboration, and communication, especially regarding information technology and planning at the federal and regional levels. These priority interventions are now being developed, implemented, and validated at 5 pilot partner sites.