Why does maxillary skeletal expansion work with some adults and fail with Others?: A narrative review.

Maxillary skeletal expansion is considered a challenging treatment modality in adult ages. Mini-screw-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) is considered a pioneer in providing a solution for maxillary deficiency in adults away from any surgical interventions. If we consider patient cooperation and motivation, together with operator skills, as constant factors during MARPE, and exclude all hygiene and soft tissue complications that jeopardise the appliance's stability, there is a percentage of expansion failure recorded in different studies with no emphasis on what makes mid-facial diastema appear in some, rather than others. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, were searched for literature published in English till 2023. Failure was related in some literature to different criteria, as of yet, no verifiable indicators would allow us to determine success or failure in advance. This review highlighted the most common reasons for failure discussed in different literature: Chronological Age, Mid-palatal suture maturation, Bone density, Sex, Race, Appliance design, and Expansion technique used. This study could be considered an attempt to make candidate selection for non-surgical maxillary skeletal expansion at this old age easier, time-saving, and cost less.

The Influence of the Diameter of Orthodontic Mini-Implants on Primary Stability: Bending Tests-An In Vitro Study.

Orthodontic Mini-Implants have a high success rate, but it is crucial to assess the load that they bear in order to maintain their primary stability. Increasing the diameter can improve this stability, but there are limitations due to the proximity of the tooth roots. To avoid damage, smaller diameters are used, which can decrease resistance and cause permanent deformations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of the diameter of Mini-Implants through bending force tests, taking into account primary stability after one and two insertions. METHODS: Here, 40 Ti6AI4V alloy Mini-Implants of two different brands and diameters were divided into eight groups, half of which received one insertion in the artificial bone, and the rest received two. All were subjected to a constant bending force using an INSTRON-Electropuls E10000LT (Norwood, MA, USA) until fracture. RESULTS: The smaller-diameter Mini-Implants were less resistant to fracture, but both were able to withstand the necessary loads produced by orthodontic movements. As for the inserts, there were no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: There is an advantage to using 1.6 mm Mini-Implants over 2.0 mm ones, as a smaller diameter does not lead to fracture due to the forces used in orthodontic treatment. Having one or two inserts did not have a statistically significant effect.

Stress distribution of four implant supported overdentures with tilted standard-sized implants and mini implants.

Purpose: The goal of the current study is to evaluate the stress distribution when tilted implants and mini-implants are used to support a mandibular overdenture. Materials and methods: Three-dimensional (3D) finite element models of mandibular overdentures were established using four, axial, standard-sized implants (SA model), four standard-sized implants with the mesial ones axial and the distal ones tilted (ST model) and four mini-implants (MA model) with Locator attachments. On each model, a 100 N load was applied to the overdenture in four different directions; bilateral vertical, unilateral vertical and oblique load on the posterior region, and a vertical load on the incisors. The stresses distributed at the peri-implant bone, implants, the prosthetic components, and the overdentures were evaluated. Results: Non-axial posterior loading caused higher stress values in the implant and the prosthetic component than axial posterior loading. Lower stress values of the implant and the prosthetic component were observed in the ST model than SA model. The stress distribution in the overdenture at posterior loads were mostly observed around the implants. Conclusion: Less prosthetic complications may be expected when the treatment option in the ST model is used. Fatigue fractures may occur around the implants in the overdentures, precautions are advised.

Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of three versus four mini-implants for simultaneous intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: A 3D FEM study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the displacement pattern of maxillary anterior teeth in the sagittal and vertical planes and evaluate the stress distribution in pdl, bone, teeth of the maxillary anterior region, and around the mini-implants during simultaneous en-masse retraction and intrusion using two, three, and four mini-implants combinations. METHODS: A three-dimensional FEM model of maxillary teeth and periodontal ligament housed in the alveolar bone with extracted first premolarswasgenerated. The models were broadly divided into three groups according to the number of mini-implants. Mini-implants were placed bilaterally between the second premolar and molar in group I, and along with bilateral implants, an additional mid-implant was placed between the central incisors as in group II, whereas in group III, anterior mini-implants were placed in between lateral incisors and canine bilaterally. RESULTS: The two mini-implant model showed the maximum amount of retraction in the sagittal plane followed by three and four mini-implant models. In the vertical plane, all six anterior teeth showed intrusion only in the four mini-implant model. The stress in cortical bone, cancellous bone, PDL, around the mini-implants, and in lateral incisor was maximum in the three mini-implant model, followed by four mini-implants with the least stress in the two mini-implant model. CONCLUSION: The four mini-implant model is better than the three and two mini-implants model as there is a more even distribution of force in the four mini-implants model as compared to the three mini-implants model.

Heat Treatment's Vital Role: Elevating Orthodontic Mini-Implants for Superior Performance and Longevity-Pilot Study.

Orthodontic mini-implants are devices used for anchorage in various orthodontic treatments. We conducted a pilot study which aimed to observe preliminary trends regarding the impact of heat treatment on the elastic modulus of Ti6Al4V alloy and stainless steel 316L mini-implants. The initial phase involved testing the impact of heat treatment on the mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V alloy and stainless steel 316L mini-implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten self-drilling mini-implants sourced from two distinct manufacturers (Jeil Medical Corporation® and Leone®) with dimensions of 2.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length were tested. They were separated into two material groups: Ti6Al4V and 316L. Using the CETRUMT-2 microtribometer equipment, indentation testing was conducted employing a diamond-tipped Rockwell penetrator at a constant force of 4.5 N. RESULTS: Slight differences were observed in the elastic modulus of the Ti6Al4V alloy (103.99 GPa) and stainless steel 316L (203.20 GPa) compared to natural bone. The higher elastic moduli of these materials indicate that they are stiffer, which could potentially lead to stress-shielding phenomena and bone resorption. Heat treatment resulted in significant changes in mechanical properties, including elastic modulus reductions of approximately 26.14% for Ti6Al4V and 24.82% for 316L, impacting their performance in orthodontic applications. CONCLUSION: Understanding the effects of heat treatment on these alloys is crucial for optimizing their biomechanical compatibility and longevity in orthodontic treatment. To fully evaluate the effects of heat treatment on mini-implants and to refine their design and efficacy in clinical practice, further research is needed.

Influence of the maxillary third molars and the surrounding cortical plate during maxillary tooth movement with TADS- A CBCT Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of the presence/absence of third molars and intact/loss of cortical plate of the maxillary tuberosity on the amount of distal movement of the maxillary first permanent molar during distal movement of the maxillary dentition with mini-implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty six maxillary tuberosity sites were evaluated in eighteen young adult patients. The distal movement of the entire maxillary dentition was performed with mini-implants with 200 g of distalising force applied from the mini-implant placed in the maxillary posterior buccal region to attachments placed on the arch wire between the maxillary lateral incisor and canine bilaterally. The distal movement of the maxillary first permanent molars was measured on lateral cephalograms. The maxillary tuberosity sites with intact cortical plate due to congenitally missing third molars or atraumatic extraction of third molars (G1), partial loss of cortical plate due to surgical removal of third molars (G2), fully erupted third molars (G4), third molars located at (G3), and below the cementoenamel junction (G5) were evaluated with cone beam computed tomography. One way Anova and Fisher LSD test was done. RESULTS: The order of greater to lesser amount of distal movement of the maxillary first permanent molar depending on the integrity of maxillary of tuberosity was partial loss of cortical plate, third molars at the cementoenamel junction, third molars below the cementoenamel junction, intact cortical plate and fully erupted third molars. CONCLUSION: The integrity of the cortical plate and the relative position of the maxillary third molar to the second molar influence the amount of distal movement of the maxillary first permanent molar during distal movement of the maxillary teeth with TADS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The amount of distal movement of the maxillary dentition appears to depend on the presence or absence of the third molars and the condition of the cortical plate in the region of the maxillary tuberosity and thereby greatly influence the outcome of treatment.

Comparison of posttreatment stability after total mandibular arch distalization with mini-implants and mandibular setback surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To compare posttreatment stability in skeletal Class III patients between those treated by total mandibular arch distalization (TMAD) with buccal mini-implants and those by mandibular setback surgery (MSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The samples included 40 Class III adults, 20 treated by TMAD using buccal interradicular mini-implants and 20 treated with MSS. Lateral cephalograms were taken at pretreatment, posttreatment, and at least 1-year follow-up, and 24 variables were compared using statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mandibular first molars moved distally 1.9 mm with intrusion of 1.1 mm after treatment in the TMAD group. The mandibular incisors moved distally by 2.3 mm. The MSS group exhibited a significant skeletal change of the mandible, whereas the TMAD group did not. During retention, there were no skeletal or dental changes other than 0.6 mm labial movement of the mandibular incisors (P < .05) in the MSS group. There was 1.4° of mesial tipping (P < .01) and 0.4 mm of mesial movement of the mandibular molars and 1.9° of labial tipping (P < .001) and 0.8 mm of mesial movement of the mandibular incisors in the TMAD group. These dental changes were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The TMAD group showed a slightly decreased overjet with labial tipping of the mandibular incisors and mesial tipping of the first molars during retention. Posttreatment stability of the mandibular dentition was not significantly different between the groups. It can be useful to plan camouflage treatment by TMAD with mini-implants in mild-to-moderate Class III patients.

Maxillary molar distalization treated with clear aligners combined with mini-implants and angel button using different traction force: a finite element study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biomechanical system of molar distalization with clear aligner therapy (CAT) combined with angel button using interradicular mini-implants (IRMIs) with varying elastic forces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FE models including maxilla, complete maxillary dentition, periodontal ligaments (PDL), composite attachments, mini-implants (MI), and dedicated orthodontic aligner, were constructed. Three groups were created in accordance with the sagittal position of MI. Elastic forces (0 N,1 N,1.5 N,2 N) were applied. RESULTS: CAT without elastics caused labial tipping and intrusion of the anterior teeth. Initial labial tipping and the von Mises stress of the maxillary anterior teeth decreased as the elastic forces increased.

Comparison of treatment effects during en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth placed using mini-implants placed at infrazygomatic crest and interradicular sites: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this prospective study was to examine the efficacy of posterior interradicular and infrazygomatic crest mini-implants for en-masse anterior retraction. METHODS: The 22 patients were divided into two groups. In group 1 (IZC n = 11), mini-implants were placed in the infrazygomatic crests and in group 2 (IR, n = 11), mini-implants were placed in the molar-premolar interradicular sites. Soft tissue, skeletal, and dental treatment effects between two groups were compared using lateral cephalometric measurements. RESULTS: The average angle between the cranial base and A point was 1.01 degrees (P = .004), and the linear distance between the upper incisor and A point was 2.67 to 5.2 millimetres (P = .00). In IZC group the maxillary incisor to the palatal plane moved upward by a mean of -5.20 mm (P = .059), whereas in IR group the incisor movement changed by -2.67 mm (P = .068). There was no significant difference between groups IZC and IR while comparing overall treatment changes on upper incisor position change, angle, and overjet. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-implants placed in between the molar and premolar as well as the infrazygomatic crest can withstand the deepening of the bite during retraction. Mini-implants in IZC are capable of causing intrusion of the anterior teeth and preventing intrusion of the molars, thereby providing absolute anchoring in all planes. Placement of the mini-implants in the infrazygomatic crest resulted in more linear retraction.

Patients' perception of orthodontic mini implants at different sites: anterior vs posterior maxilla.

The aim of this study was to compare patients' overall perception of treatment with orthodontic mini implants placed in the maxillary anterior or posterior region. Twenty young adult patients were divided into 2 groups (n = 10). In group 1 (G1), mini implants were placed in the maxillary anterior midline just below the labial frenum. In group 2 (G2), mini implants were placed bilaterally in the maxillary posterior region, between the maxillary second premolar and first molar at the mucogingival junction. Questionnaires were used to record patient experiences with the mini implants at 3 time points: immediately after placement, 1 week after placement, and immediately after removal. Patients were offered 3 choices representing different levels of intensity. The patients were also asked to record their responses on a scale of 0 to 10 for each parameter evaluated. Each unit was subdivided into units of 10. A score of 0 indicated the best response and 10 indicated the worst response. Statistical analyses included the Student t and chi-square tests. Patients in G2 reported greater discomfort during mini implant placement than did patients in G1 (P = 0.036). During the following week, some patients experienced a bad taste at the site, rated significantly worse in G2 than in G1 (P = 0.043). There was also a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.032) in response to a question about the overall experience of the procedure, with G2 rating it better than G1; in the anterior region, the patients had a mean score of 2.00 (SD, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.22 to 3.78); and in the posterior region, they had a mean score of 0.00 (SD, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.81 to 3.19). There were no statistically significant differences in the distributions of responses for any measured outcome between G1 and G2. At mini implant removal, a greater number of patients in G2 than in G1 found the entire procedure to be somewhat different (unfamiliar) compared with other routine orthodontic procedures (P = 0.004). Despite the scores for the question on overall experience, the responses to questions about individual aspects of treatment indicated that patients with mini implants placed in the anterior region had a better experience than did patients with mini implants placed in the posterior region.

Use of mini implants for the two-implant retained mandibular overdenture: A prospective study.

Background: The two-implant retained mandibular overdenture utilizing nonsplinted implants is a proven treatment modality for completely edentulous patients. However, a lacuna still exists regarding the suitability of mini dental implants for this purpose. The purpose of the study was to evaluate implant stability and crestal bone loss in single-piece mini dental implants loaded with immediate or conventional loading protocols to retain a mandibular overdenture. Method: Twenty-four completely edentulous patients were rehabilitated using conventional maxillary complete denture and a mandibular two-implant retained overdenture utilizing nonsplinted single piece mini implants. The implants were loaded with immediate or conventional loading protocols. Implant stability (with Periotest TM) and crestal bone loss (with radiovisiograph and radiographic grid) were evaluated at the time of loading and at one, two, and six months after loading. Statistical analysis was done with the Independent Samples "t" test and One-Way ANOVA. Results: Mean Periotest Values observed were significantly more negative in implants loaded with the conventional loading protocol. Crestal bone loss was significantly lesser in the immediate loading protocol but was still higher than the requisite 1.5 mm postulated by established criteria. Conclusion: Two single-piece nonsplinted mini implants may be sufficient to retain a mandibular overdenture utilizing the immediate loading protocol. Further studies with a longer duration of observation and larger sample size are required.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Flapless Corticotomy with Low-Level Laser Therapy in En Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

(1) Background: This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures when accelerating en masse retraction between the piezocision procedure and the subsequent application of low-level laser therapy (FC+LLLT), with the piezocision alone (FC), and in a control group. (2) Methods: A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted involving 60 patients (41 females and 19 males) with Class II division I malocclusion. The en masse retraction was performed using NiTi closed coil springs attached to miniscrews. The LLLT was performed using an 808 nm Ga-Al-As diode laser. Patient responses regarding pain, discomfort, swelling, and chewing difficulties were reported at ten assessment points. (3) Results: The greatest pain levels were observed 24 h after the application of force during the first and third months of retraction. The mean pain, discomfort, swelling, and chewing difficulties were significantly smaller in the control group than in the FC and FC+LLLT groups. High satisfaction levels were reported in all three groups (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: The accelerated en masse retraction via piezocision, followed by a small course of LLLT, was accompanied by significantly fewer pain, discomfort, and chewing difficulties than the control group. LLLT is a valuable addition to piezocision, with an improved patient experience.

Survival analysis of temporary anchorage devices: A retrospective analysis in a Nigerian orthodontic patient population.

OBJECTIVES: Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) are skeletal anchorage devices. They are minimally invasive and placed by the orthodontist to prevent unwanted tooth movement. This study evaluated the survival rate of orthodontic TADs at 6 months. This study also assessed the effect of age, gender, side, site, dental arch of placement, and length of the TADs on its survival rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of the hospital. The study sample comprised orthodontic patients who required the placement of TADs during treatment at a private dental facility in Lagos. Data for the study were obtained from the case files of the study subjects and included the subjects' age, gender, date of placement of the TADs, the site, side and arch of placement, the length of the TADs, and the survival rate of 6 months after placement. RESULTS: We reviewed 90 placed TADs and observed a survival rate of 88.9%. Most TAD failures occurred in the first month of placement (p = 001). There was no observable statistically significant effect of all other variables assessed (age, gender, arch, site, side, or implant length) on the survival rate of the TADs. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate of TADs was high. Most TAD failures significantly occurred within one month of placement. There was no significant association between all other clinical variables and orthodontic mini-implant survival.

Quantitative assessment of root resorption in TAD-aided anchorage with and without RAP: A CBCT study on en masse retraction cases.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of root resorption with mini implant-aided anchorage, with and without inducing the regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP) in en masse retraction cases using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: Thirty patients requiring therapeutic extraction of all first premolars were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups of fifteen patients each (groups I and II). Patients of both groups underwent retraction using mini implants. In patients of group II, the RAP was initiated before starting retraction. For each patient, CBCT of the maxillary and mandibular anterior region was taken before treatment and after retraction to evaluate root length changes. RESULTS: The amount of root resorption post-retraction was lesser in group II as compared to group I for the maxillary canine, mandibular canines, and mandibular lateral incisors. When the amount of root resorption was scored according to the Malmgren index, a greater percentage of teeth in group I (17.8%) showed root resorption of score of 3 as compared to group II (6.1%). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that the RAP caused reduced root resorption, but its effect was localized to the area where it was induced. When mini implants are used for absolute anchorage during en masse retraction, the RAP can be induced to reduce the root resorption that results from increased treatment time associated with implant-aided retraction.

Insertion of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices with free gingival grafting for phenotype modification of the peri-implant mucosa.

Background: Mini Implants are widely used in contemporary orthodontics, they provide skeletal anchorage even in non-compliant patients, facilitate orthodontic tooth movement, are easy to place and are relatively inexpensive. Their failure is multifactorial, and the quality of the soft tissue can present a risk limitation for the insertion of TADS. Orthodontic Mini Implants inserted in keratinized gingiva present fewer tissue-related complications and higher survival rate, than those inserted in non-keratinized mucosa. The purpose of this report is to present and describe this novel technique to modify and enhance the peri-implant mucosa of Orthodontic Mini Implants inserted in nonkeratinized gingiva. Methods: A free gingival graft was harvested from the palate in combination with a buccal recipient site preparation in the alveolar mucosa and a TAD insertion procedure. Results: After twenty-one days of healing, graft integration was observed. One hundred and eighty days after insertion and twelve weeks of loading, none to mild signs of clinical inflammation were documented, and the patient reported no pain or discomfort. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this report, free gingival grafting for phenotype modification of the peri-implant mucosa, can benefit patients who need insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in non-keratinized mucosa for orthodontic tooth movement.

A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Around the Bone Mini-Implant Interface Based on the Mini-Implant Angle of Insertion, Diameter, and Length.

Background: Temporary anchorage devices or mini implants have gained great attraction due to their capability to provide absolute anchorage, low cost, versatility, and can be loaded immediately after placement. Material and Methods: Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the distribution of stress at the bone mini implant interface based on different angles of insertion (30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°) mini implant diameter (1.3 mm, 1.6 mm, and 2 mm) and mini implant length (6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm). A retraction force of 2 N was applied. Results: Areas of maximum stress concentration were the head and neck of the mini implant and cortical bone around the mini implant. A very minimal amount of stress was found in the cancellous bone. The maximum stress found in the cortical bone was 5.1301 MPa and in the mini implant was 26.355 MPa with an angle of insertion of 30°, a 1.3 mm diameter, and a 6 mm length. The minimum stress found in the cortical bone was 1.4702 MPa and that in the mini implant was 5.3895 MPa with an angle of insertion of 90°, a 2 mm diameter, and a 10 mm length. Conclusion: For maximum stability, mini implants should be placed at a perpendicular angle of insertion with sufficient diameter and length.

Ridge mini-implants, a versatile biomechanical anchorage device whose success is significantly enhanced by splinting: a clinical report.

OBJECTIVES: This clinical report aims to highlight the factors affecting the clinical success of alveolar ridge mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage and provide an overview of the biomechanical versatility of this miniscrew and steps involving the proper technique of its placement. METHODS: For this clinical report, charts for 295 patients who had temporary anchorage devices (TADs) were screened. Twenty patients [15 females and 5 males: mean age = 38.15 ± 15.10 years] with 50 alveolar ridge mini-screws were assessed. A descriptive summary of the main factors affecting their clinical success and the technique employed for their placement was comprehensively discussed and illustrated, in addition to the presentation of some clinical cases illustrating their potential clinical uses. RESULTS: The survival duration (7.32 ± 9.01 months) and clinical success of the alveolar ridge mini-implants that failed (19/50) seem to be affected primarily by 2 factors: splinting; none of the splinted mini-implants failed (0/10) compared to (19/40) of the single mini-implants that failed, and the length of the used mini-implant; the average length of the mini-implants that did not fail was 9.23 mm. Additionally, it appears that these mini-implants are biomechanically robust and durable, those that did not fail had an average survival duration of 35.97 ± 19.79 months. CONCLUSION: Ridge mini-implants offer significant biomechanical versatility in patients with partially edentulous ridges needing complex pre-prosthetic orthodontic movements. The presence of splinting and the length of the used mini-implants are factors that might affect the clinical success of the alveolar ridge mini-implants.

Skeletal Anchorage Augmentation in Extraction/Nonextraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Study.

AIM: To evaluate and compare skeletal, dental, and soft tissue parameters by therapeutic extraction of first premolar and nonextraction distalization of maxillary and mandibular arches in bimaxillary proclination using the skeletal anchorage system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 40 orthodontic patients undergoing extraction or nonextraction treatment are enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Participants are randomly assigned to either the extraction or nonextraction group and receive treatment augmented with skeletal anchorage. Mini implants were placed in the extraction group for retraction and infra-zygomatic crest (IZC) and buccal shelf screws were placed in the nonextraction group for distalization. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS: Comparison between the ages of the patients among both Groups showed no significant difference. A significant difference is observed in dental and soft tissue parameters before and after the treatment in group A, whereas skeletal parameters also showed significant changes along with dental and soft tissue parameters in group B. CONCLUSION: There is a significant change in the position of incisors by retraction and facial profile improves gradually in group A while for group B, a marked change in lower facial height was even seen. On comparing both the groups, a highly significant difference can be seen with respect to the amount of incisor retraction and change in molar inclination. The time taken for retraction of incisors is less in comparison to distalization. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: With this, we can easily avoid premolar extraction, and in cases of impacted third molars distalization as when indicated can be helpful as a part of the nonextraction treatment plan.

Comparative analysis of two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology for the orthodontic mini-implants placement.

To analyze and compare the accuracy and root contact prevalence, comparing a conventional freehand technique and two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology for the orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement. Methods Two hundred and seven orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants were placed using either a conventional freehand technique (FHT) and two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology (AR TOOTH and AR SCREWS). Accuracy across different dental sectors was also analyzed. CBCT and intraoral scans were taken both prior to and following orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement. The deviation angle and horizontal were then analyzed; these measurements were taken at the coronal entry point and apical endpoint between the planned and performed orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants. In addition, any complications resulting from mini-implant placement, such as spot perforations, were also analyzed across all dental sectors.Results The statistical analysis showed significant differences between study groups with regard to the coronal entry-point (p < 0.001), apical end-point(p < 0.001) and angular deviations (p < 0.001). Furthermore, statistically significant differences were shown between the orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement site at the coronal entry-point (p < 0.0001) and apical end-point (p < 0.001). Additionally, eight root perforations were observed in the FHT group, while there were no root perforations in the two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology.Conclusions The navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology has an effect on the accuracy of orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement and results in fewer intraoperative complications, comparing to the conventional free-hand technique. The AR TOOTH augmented reality technique showed more accurate results between planned and placed orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants, comparing to the AR SCREWS and conventional free-hand techniques. The navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology showed fewer intraoperative complications, comparing to the conventional free-hand technique.

Success rate of infrazygomatic crest mini-implants used for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in first premolar extraction cases: A three-dimensional comparative prospective clinical trial between adolescents and young adults.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of infrazygomatic mini-implants between adolescents and young adults. METHODS: A total of 60 subjects of different age groups ie, (group I [adolescents]: 12-18 years, mean age: 14.9 ± 2.9 years; group II [young adults]: 19-25 years, mean age = 21.9 ± 3.1 years) were assessed in the study. En-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth was carried out with extraction of upper first premolars with infrazygomatic crest (IZC) mini-implants as anchorage units. Clinical parameters such as success rate, soft tissue thickness, maximum insertion torque, maximum removal torque, pain response, soft tissue response, and cone-beam computed tomography parameters such as embedded angulation, penetration depth, thickness of bone on buccal and palatal aspect of mini-implant, and peri-implant bone density were evaluated. RESULTS: The success rate of IZC mini-implants in adolescents was found to be 96.6% and 98.3% in young adults respectively. There was no significant difference in success rate between the two groups. Intergroup comparison showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in terms of maximum insertion torque, maximum removal torque, soft tissue thickness, cortical bone thickness, and peri-implant bone density values. Comparison between right and left side revealed a significant difference (P < 0.05) with regards to soft tissue response, soft tissue thickness, total bone thickness, cortical bone thickness, and peri-implant bone density. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the success rate of IZC mini-implants between adolescents and young adults. Thus, the use of IZC mini-implants can be recommended in adolescents for successful orthodontic treatment.