Optimizing The Timing of Stereotactic Minimally Invasive Drainage for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Intracerebral hemorrhage is a high-risk pathological event that is associated with formidable morality rates. Here, our objective was to perform a retrospective study to determine the best timing for drainage using physiological data on patients who received drainage at different timings. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 198 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who underwent stereotactic drainage at the conventional timing (surgery within 12 h of admission; control group) and 216 patients who underwent stereotactic drainage at a customized surgical timing (elective group). Follow-ups were performed at 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The clinical indicators, including prognosis, hematoma clearance, recurrent hemorrhage, intracerebral infection, pulmonary infection, deep venous thrombosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and matrix metallopeptidase 2 and 9 levels, were compared between the control and elective groups. Our data indicated that the elective group had significantly better prognosis compared to the control group (p = 0.021), with a higher rate of hematoma clearance (p = 0.004) and a lower rate of recurrent hemorrhage (p = 0.018). The total occurrence rate of post-surgery complications was also lower for the elective group (p = 0.026). NIHSS scores and serum MMP2/9 levels of the elective group were lower than those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Customized timing of stereotactic drainage may be superior to conventional fixed timing (within 12 h post-hemorrhage) in reducing post-surgery complications and promoting recovery, which supports the potential use of customized timing of stereotactic minimally invasive drainage as a new convention in clinics.

Minimally Invasive Drainage of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. A South American Experience with the MISTIE Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the second most common subtype of stroke but is associated with greater rates of disability or mortality. One of the factors of a poor prognosis is large hematoma volume. The MISTIE III trial with the aim of decreasing clot size showed that the greater the ICH reduction, the higher likelihood of lower mortality without a net increase in the proportion of patients with severe disability. Our aim is to describe our experience with treating selective patients with ICH per the MISTIE trial protocol in a university hospital in Argentina during 4 years. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients with ICH treated at a single university tertiary-care center from 2017 to 2021 with the MISTIE protocol. RESULTS: We deployed this procedure in 7 patients with a median age of 61 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 14, an ICH volume of 35 mL and median ICH score of 2. Five of 7 patients achieved the target goal of hematoma reduction; 4 of the patients had a total independence level and 1 needed minimal help at 12 months after discharge. Five patients had a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3 and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score 4-8) and 2 patients had died but neither because of consequences of thrombolysis of the intracerebral hemorrhage. We did not find bleeding complications during catheter placement, alteplase infusion, or after catheter removal. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure can be carried out safely in Latin American centers that have experience in managing neurocritical patients.

Quality of life after surgical and endoscopic management of severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for severe acute severe pancreatitis (SAP) can significantly affect Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The effects of different treatment strategies such as endoscopic and surgical necrosectomy on HR-QoL in patients with SAP remain poorly investigated. AIM: To critically appraise the available evidence on HR-QoL following surgical or endoscopic necrosectomy in patient with SAP. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Google™ Scholar, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Reference Citation Analysis databases for studies that investigated HR-QoL following surgical or endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with SAP. Data collected included patient characteristics, outcomes of interventions and HR-QoL-related details. RESULTS: Eleven studies were found to have evaluated HR-QoL following treatment for severe acute pancreatitis including 756 patients. Three studies were randomized trials, four were prospective cohort studies and four were retrospective cohort studies with prospective follow-up. Four studies compared HR-QoL following surgical and endoscopic necrosectomy. Several metrics of HR-QoL were used including Short Form (SF)-36 and EuroQol. One randomized trial and one cohort study demonstrated significantly improved physical scores at three months in patients who underwent endoscopic necrosectomy compared to surgical necrosectomy. One prospective study that examined HR-QoL following surgical necrosectomy reported some deterioration in the functional status of the patients. On the other hand, a cohort study that assessed the long-term HR-QoL following sequential surgical necrosectomy stated that all patients had SF-36 > 60%. In the only study that examined patients following endoscopic necrosectomy, the HR-QoL was also very good. Three studies investigated the quality adjusted life years suggesting that endoscopic and surgical approaches to management of pancreatic necrosis were comparable in cost effectiveness. Finally, regarding HR-QoL between open necrosectomy and minimally invasive approaches, patients who underwent the later had a significantly better overall quality of life, vitality and mental health. CONCLUSION: This review would suggest that the endoscopic approach might offer better HR-QoL compared to surgical necrosectomy. However, the available comparative literature was very limited. More randomized trials powered to detect differences in HR-QoL are required.

Comparison of pancreatic function and quality of life between patients with infected pancreatitis necrosis undergoing open necrosectomy and minimally invasive drainage: A long-term study.

The present study aimed to determine whether a difference in pancreatic function and quality of life (QoL) is present between patients with infected pancreatitis necrosis (IPN) undergoing open necrosectomy (ON) and minimally invasive drainage (MID). The medical records of patients with IPN discharged from Jinling Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Pancreatic function and QoL were compared between patients treated with ON and MID. Pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function were assessed using the oral glucose tolerance test and fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) test, respectively. The standard Short Form 36 health questionnaire was used to evaluate the QoL of patients. The analysis included 101 patients who underwent either ON (n=40, 39.6%) or MID (n=61, 60.4%). There were no significant differences in exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function between the two groups evaluated based on FE-1, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin and 2-h plasma glucose (P<0.05). The scores of the QoL questionnaire were significantly higher in patients treated with MID than in patients treated with ON, including the scores of general health perception (19.39±3.07 vs. 17.37±3.63, P=0.003), vitality (18.93±2.88 vs. 17.57±3.47, P=0.035), social role functioning (8.85±1.43 vs. 8.15±1.98, P=0.042), emotional role functioning (5.33±1.07 vs. 4.82±1.25, P=0.034), mental health (24.21±3.31 vs. 22.57±3.91, P=0.026) and the total QoL score (125.12±13.16 vs. 116.50±16.94, P=0.005). In conclusion, although the initial health of the patient may have influenced the treatment provided, patients with IPN who received MID achieved a better post-treatment QoL than those treated with ON. No significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding the endocrine and exocrine functions of the pancreas.

Escalation surgical therapy approaches for complicated intra-abdominal infection / 中国实用外科杂志

Complicated intra-abdominal infections(cIAIs)is always associated with high mortality,invasive open surgery cannot improve patients' prognosis.With the spread of the concept of minimally invasive surgery(MIS)and damage control surgery(DCS),the authors propose the escalation surgical therapy approaches to better manage cIAIs with less operative damange.These approaches include minimally invasive drainage(percutaneous drainage,endoscopic drainage),MIS(minimally invasive operative drainage,enterostomy)and open surgery(relaparotomy on demand,planned relaparotomy,open abdomen).These treatments cause increasing trauma stress,longer recovery period and higher morbidity rates to patients successively.Due to the increased use of planned relaparotomy in treating cIAIs,abdominal packing and open abdomen were applied more frequently.However,the prevention of open abdomen-associated morbidies,including enterocutaneous fistula and abdominal wall defect,should be paid attention to.In clinical practice,use of escalation surgical therapy approaches to treat cIAIs is not fixed,doctors should choose appropriate management according to patients' conditions.Meanwhile,good resuscitation,appropriate choice of antibiotics and nutritional support are essential to improve the outcome of patients with cIAIs.

[Surgical resolutions determining outcomes of infected pancreatic necrosis]. / Khirurgicheskie resheniia, opredeliaiushchie iskhod lecheniia infitsirovannogo pankreonekroza.

AIM: To evaluate technology, indications and time of minimally invasive semi-closed and laparotomic sanations for infected pancreatic necrosis (IP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Initially it was used sonography-assisted minimally invasive semi-closed drainage of IP with gradual augmentation of catheters' diameter. In 462 patients with IP liquid pus prevailed over sequesters in epigastric localized pancreatonecrotic phlegmon (ELPF) and pancreatonecrotic abscesses. So, minimally invasive approach may be definitive. Epigastric advanced pancreatonecrotic phlegmon with predominant sequesters is often followed by conversion to transverse omentobursopancreatostomy (OBPS) to open all purulent accumulations. RESULTS: Surgical treatment immediately after parapancreatic infiltrate suppuration (i.e. within 3-4 weeks after onset of the disease) is associated with reduced mortality. Absent result of minimally invasive drainage is followed by mortality from the 11th day and maximum in 14 days after treatment onset. Therefore, focal IP resistant to minimally invasive drainage requires conversion to transverse OBPS or video-assisted sequestrectomy after 10-13 days. The lowest mortality (14.8±2.5%) was observed in patients who underwent minimally invasive drainage or transverse OBPS within 10-13 days. Ineffective prolonged minimally invasive drainage was accompanied by high mortality rate (60.7±3.2%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Conversion to transverse OBPS or video-assisted sequestrectomy are required if minimally invasive drainage of IP is ineffective after 10-13 days. Clear understanding of indications for closed and open drainage of PI helps to avoid tactical and technological errors.

Evaluation and Experience of Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Drainage and Craniotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Epidural Hematoma / 现代生物医学进展

Objective:To analyse the evaluation and experience of clinical effect of minimally invasive drainage and craniotomy in the treatment of patient with epidural hematoa.Methods:100 cases of patients who were diagnosed as epidural hematoma from January 2015 to January 2016 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,where the control group were given craniotomy,and the observation group were given minimal invasive drainage.The effect of the surgery and the life qualities before and after treatment of the two groups were compared.Results:The effect of observation group is better than that of control group (P ＜ 0.05);craniocerebral defect and the re-hemorrhage incidence occurrence in the observation group were obviously lower than those in the control group,(0 ％,6 ％ vs 12 ％,20 ％) (P＜0.05).Conclusion:Compared with craniotomy,minimal invasive drainage in clinical treatment of epidural hematoma showed advantage in at smaller trauma,faster recovery,and better effect,thus deserving further promotion of clinic application.

Minimally invasive drainage tube placement and tee-junctions irrigation for chronic subdural hematoma / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To discuss the feasibility of minimally invasive drainage tube placement and tee-junctions irrigation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Methods Transcranial drainage and closed tee-junctions irrigation was carried out under local anesthesia in 31 cases of chronic subdural hematoma by using self-made trocar and osteotome. Results All the patients had been completely freed of the disease, without pneumocephalus. Follow-up for 3～6 months revealed no recurrence. Conclusions Minimally invasive tube placement and tee-junctions irrigation for chronic subdural hematoma is feasible. It not only clears away the lesions thoroughly, but also prevents the pneumocephalus effectively.