The Outcomes of Preterm Infants with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated by Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation.

In recent years, the utilization of minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) and Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as the primary respiratory assistance has become increasingly prevalent among preterm infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). This study aims to compare the outcomes between MIST administered with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), with the objective of exploring the respiratory therapeutic benefits of these two approaches. This retrospective study collected data from the neonatal intensive care unit of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital spanning from January 2016 to June 2021. Infants were divided into two groups based on the type of NIV utilized. The NCPAP group comprised 32 infants, while the NIPPV group comprised 22 infants. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences: the NIPPV group had a smaller gestational age, lower birth weight, higher proportion of female infants, and earlier initiation of MIST. Additionally, the NIPPV group exhibited higher incidence rates of retinopathy of prematurity, longer respiratory support duration, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality. However, upon adjustment, these differences were not statistically significant. Analysis of venous blood gas and respiratory parameter changes indicated that both the NCPAP and NIPPV groups experienced improvements in oxygenation and ventilation following MIST.

Severe Pneumonia Caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Adenovirus in Children from 2 to 24 Months at Children's Hospital 1 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

In Vietnam, due to the lack of facilities to detect respiratory viruses from patients' specimens, there are only a few studies on the detection of viral pathogens causing pneumonia in children, especially respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and adenovirus (Adv). Here, we performed a cross-sectional descriptive prospective study on 138 children patients from 2 to 24 months old diagnosed with severe pneumonia hospitalized at the Respiratory Department of Children's Hospital 1 from November 2021 to August 2022. The number of patients selected in this study was based on the formula n = ([Z(1 - α/2)]2 × P [1 - P])/d2, with α = 0.05, p = 0.5, and d = 9%, and the sampling technique was convenient sampling until the sample size was met. A rapid test was used to detect RSV and Adv from the nasopharyngeal swabs and was conducted immediately after the patient's hospitalization. Laboratory tests were performed, medical history interviews were conducted, and nasotracheal aspirates were collected for multiplex real-time PCR (MPL-rPCR) to detect viral and bacterial pathogens. The results of the rapid test and the MPL-rPCR in the detection of both pathogens were the same at 31.9% (44/138) for RSV and 8.7% (7/138) for Adv, respectively. Using MPL-rPCR, the detection rate was 21% (29/138) for bacterial pathogens, 68.8% (95/138) for bacterial-viral co-infections, and 6.5% (9/138) for viral pathogens. The results showed few distinctive traits between RSV-associated and Adv-associated groups, and the Adv group children were more prone to bacterial infection than those in the RSV group. In addition, the Adv group experienced a longer duration of treatment and a higher frequency of re-hospitalizations compared to the RSV group. A total of 100% of Adv infections were co-infected with bacteria, while 81.82% of RSV co-infected with bacterial pathogens (p = 0.000009). This study might be one of the few conducted in Vietnam aimed at identifying viral pathogens causing severe pneumonia in children.

Comparison of Two Methods for Weaning from Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure via the Cyclic Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula or Room Air in Preterm Infants.

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is extensively used for preterm infants experiencing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Weaning from NCPAP includes direct weaning or gradually extending room air exposure. However, a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an alternative weaning method. Therefore, this study evaluated the clinical outcomes of HFNC and progressively increasing room air duration as weaning strategies. This study enrolled 46 preterm infants with RDS receiving NCPAP support who underwent the cyclic use of NCPAP and HFNC weaning protocol as the HFNC group; a retrospective analysis included 87 preterm infants weaned from NCPAP by gradually extending room air duration as the room air group. Differences in clinical conditions, complications, and short-term outcomes between the weaning methods were compared. The mean post-menstrual age at initiating NCPAP weaning was lower in the room air group than in the HFNC group (mean ± SD, 35.2 ± 2.3 weeks vs. 33.2 ± 2.5 weeks, p < 0.001). Hospital stay duration and total respiratory therapy days were longer in the HFNC group (96 ± 38 days and 80 ± 37 days, respectively) than in the room air group (78 ± 28 days and 56 ± 25 days, respectively), with p-values of 0.006 and <0.001. In conclusion, employing HFNC for weaning from NCPAP resulted in longer hospital admissions and respiratory therapy days than the room air method. However, further studies with a larger sample size are warranted for a more comprehensive evaluation, given the limited number of enrolled patients.

Noninvasive Ventilation.

Systematic Reviews and Randomized clinical trials have shown that the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared to invasive mechanical ventilation reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and or mortality. Most commonly used NIV modes include nasal continuous positive airway pressure, bi-phasic modes, such as, bi-level positive airway pressure, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation, high flow nasal cannula, noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, and nasal high frequency ventilation are discussed in this review.

Effect of Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure With and Without Surfactant Administration for the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates.

Background Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome is a common cause of respiratory distress in newborns, often resulting from a lack of surfactant production or premature lung breakdown. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of nasal continuous airway pressure with and without surfactant administration for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates. Methodology A comparative analytical study was conducted on 100 neonates (group A continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with surfactant = 50 vs. group B CPAP only= 50 ). The group was allocated to the patient according to sequence. In group A, the neonates were given surfactant by the INSURE (intubation, surfactant, extubation) technique via an endotracheal tube with a single dose of 100 mg/kg/dose within the first hours of life followed by CPAP. In group B, the neonates were given only CPAP after birth. At follow-up after 24 hours, pH, pCO2, pO2, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and FiO2 were documented. All information was recorded on a predesigned questionnaire and results were subjected to statistical analysis to determine the significance of observed differences. Collected data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Both groups were compared for mean pH, pCO2, pO2, PEEP, and FiO2 using an independent-sample t-test and effectiveness using a chi-square test. A significant difference was considered when the p-value was ≤0.05. Results Group A had a mean age of 4.84 ± 0.95 hours, while group B had a mean age of 5.5 ± 1.26 hours (p = 0.04). Gender distribution was similar in both groups, with 46.0% males and 54.0% females in group A, and 48.0% males and 52.0% females in group B (p = 0.841). Regarding post-treatment blood gas analysis, group A had a mean pH of 7.30 ± 0.05, and group B had a mean pH of 7.302 ± 0.07. While there was no significant difference in pO2 levels (p = 0.38), there was a substantial difference in pCO2 levels, with group A at 38.26 ± 4.35 and group B at 35.45 ± 4.36 (p = 0.02).CPAP parameters also showed a statistically significant difference in PEEP pCO2, with group A at 4.5 ± 0.73 and group B at 4.16 ± 0.37 (p = 0.004). After treatment, group A exhibited significant improvements in blood gas analysis and CPAP parameters compared to group B. Conclusions The study revealed that both CPAP with and without surfactant treatment effectively treat respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants, with both being safe, effective, secure, and reducing side effects. However, CPAP treatment without surfactant is a non-invasive and cost-effective option.

Efficay of high-flow nasal cannula in the paediatric population: A systematic evidence map.

PROBLEM: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been widely used in paediatric medicine as a non-invasive ventilation mode for respiratory support. However, the differences in its efficacy across different diseases and intervention types remain poorly understood. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: An extensive literature search was performed across multiple academic databases to investigate the systematic reviews and meta-analyses of HFNC. SAMPLE: This study included 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which collectively examined 355 randomised controlled trials and assessed 51 outcome indicators. RESULTS: The findings suggest that the existing clinical research evidence predominantly supports the therapeutic efficacy of HFNC. Notably, there is a significant focus on treating acute lower respiratory infection, hypoxaemia, bronchiolitis, and respiratory distress syndrome following extubation. However, concerning the respiratory status, the existing clinical research evidence mainly demonstrates the therapeutic benefits in post-extubation respiratory support and primary respiratory support. CONCLUSIONS: The research on HFNC has witnessed significant expansion, primarily focusing on respiratory disorders, post-extubation respiratory support, conscious sedation, and related fields. The evidence mapping provides a systematic and comprehensive overview of the available evidence on HFNC therapy in paediatric patients. IMPLICATIONS: This study systematically and comprehensively assessed the clinical subjects and populations involved in HFNC therapy. Notably, this study analyzed the trends, current status, and evidence gaps of research, and furnished decision-makers and relevant researchers with a more comprehensive reference basis.

The effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the duration of non-invasive respiratory support in late preterm and term infants with transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial.

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is one of the most commonly used non-invasive respiratory support modes in neonates with transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN). Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) is a non-invasive respiratory support mode that has been increasingly used in neonatal respiratory disorders. This prospective randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of nHFOV and nCPAP in reducing the duration of non-invasive respiratory support. Late preterm and term infants > 34 weeks' gestation were included in the study. The infants were randomly assigned to receive either nHFOV or nCPAP. Treatment was started with standard settings in both groups. Infants who met treatment failure criteria were switched to nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation for further positive-pressure support. A total of 60 infants were included in the study. Thirty of these infants were included in the nHFOV group and 30 were included in the nCPAP group. The median duration of non-invasive respiratory support was not significantly different between the two groups (21 h [IQR: 16-68] for nHFOV vs 15 h [IQR: 11-33] for nCPAP; p = 0.09). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, nHFOV was associated with a shorter duration of non-invasive respiratory support than nCPAP (adjusted mean difference: 16.3 h; 95% CI: 0.7 to 31.9; p = 0.04). nHFOV was well tolerated and did not increase the risk of complications.    Conclusion: Our findings suggest that nHFOV is an effective and safe ventilation mode for late preterm and term neonates with TTN.   Trial registry: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03006354). Date of registration: December 30, 2016. What is Known: • nHFOV is a ventilation model that has been increasingly used for the management of RDS. • TTN is one of the most common causes of neonatal respiratory distress. What is New: • nHFOV is associated with shorter duration of non-invasive respiratory support and duration of oxygen support. • nHFOV may be a safe and effective alternative to nCPAP for neonates with TTN.

Nasal continuous positive pressure versus simple face mask oxygenation for adult obese and obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing colonoscopy under propofol-based general anesthesia without tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if a nasal positive airway pressure (nasal CPAP) mask would decrease the number of hypoxemic events in obese and obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing colonoscopy. DESIGN: Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: We enrolled 109 patients with diagnosis of obesity and/or obstructive sleep apnea scheduled to undergo colonoscopy under propofol general anesthesia without planned tracheal intubation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive supplementary oxygen at a flow of 10 L/min, either through a nasal CPAP or a simple facemask. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the difference in the mean percentage of time spent with oxygen saturation below 90% between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included the need for airway maneuvers/interventions, average SpO2 during the case, duration and severity of oxygen desaturation, incidence and duration of procedural interruptions, and satisfaction and tolerance scores. MAIN RESULTS: 54 were allocated to the simple face mask and 55 to the nasal CPAP mask arms, respectively. A total of 6 patients experienced a hypoxemic event. Among these patients, the difference in the percentage of time spent with oxygen saturation below 90% was not clinically relevant (p = 1.0). However, patients in the nasal CPAP group required less chin lift (20% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.01) and oral cannula insertion (12.7% vs.29.6%; p = 0.03). The percentage of patients with at least one airway maneuver was higher in the simple face mask arm (68.5% vs. 41.8%; p = 0.005). Patient tolerance to device score was lower in the nasal CPAP group (8.85 vs. 9.56; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A nasal CPAP did not prevent hypoxemia and should not be used routinely for colonoscopy in obese or OSA patients if a simple face mask is an alternative therapy. However, potential advantages of its use include fewer airway maneuvers or interventions, which may be desirable in certain clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05175573.

Effect of different ventilation modalities on the early prognosis of patients with sleep apnea after acute ischemic stroke---protocol for a prospective, open-label and randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sleep apnea is highly prevalent after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and has increased stroke-related mortality and morbidity. The conventional sleep apnea treatment is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation. However, it is poorly tolerated by patients and is not used in all stroke patients. This protocol describes the impact of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) ventilation or usual care on the early prognosis of patients with sleep apnea after AIS. METHODS: This randomised controlled study will be conducted in the intensive care unit of the Department of Neurology at the Wuhan Union Hospital. According to the study plan, 150 patients with sleep apnea after AIS will be recruited. All patients are randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: the nasal catheter group (standard oxygen group), the HFNC group, and the nCPAP group. Patients receive different types of ventilation after admission to the group, and their tolerance while using the different ventilation is recorded. Patients will be followed up by telephone three months after discharge, and stroke recovery is recorded. The primary outcomes were 28-day mortality, the incidence of pulmonary infection and endotracheal intubation. DISCUSSION: This study analyses different ventilation modalities for early interventions in patients with sleep apnea after AIS. We will investigate whether nCPAP and HFNC reduce early mortality and endotracheal intubation rates and improve distant neurological recovery in patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05323266; 25 March 2022).

Efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure as a preferred airway management during intravenous sedation of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Background: As the incidence of aortic stenosis is increasing in correlation with the aging population, symptomatic patients commonly require valve replacement procedures. If left untreated, symptomatic aortic stenosis can lead to death in 2 to 3 years. Often, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures are performed with the assistance of oxygenation via nasal cannula. However, oxygenation achieved through a nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) device could be a more optimized strategy for patients without any sacrifice in efficacy compared to nasal cannula. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 28 patients at Baylor University Medical Center who presented to the operating room for a TAVR between January and October 2021. Fourteen patients received oxygenation via nasal cannula (control group) and 14 received oxygenation with nCPAP. Information gathered included method of oxygenation, length of stay, episodes of hypoxia (defined as sustained oxygen saturation <92% for at least 1 minute), paravalvular leak, pacemaker placement, and mean atrial valve (AV) gradient before and after the procedure. Results: In the nCPAP group, the average length of stay was 2.79 days vs 2.71 days in the nasal cannula group. In the nCPAP group, no patient required a permanent pacemaker, while the nasal cannula group had a 40% rate of permanent pacemaker placement. The average preprocedure AV gradient was 51.14 in the nCPAP group and 42.57 in the nasal cannula group. The average postprocedure AV gradient was 8.5 in the nCPAP group and 5.36 in the nasal cannula group. Both groups had an intensive care unit admission rate of 0%. The rate of paravalvular leak was 35.7% in the nCPAP group and 28.6% in the nasal cannula group. The nCPAP group had an average of 0 episodes of hypoxia and the nasal cannula group had an average of 0.93 episodes of hypoxia. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the viability of nCPAP as an effective method of oxygenation during intravenous sedation of TAVR patients when compared to oxygenation achieved via nasal cannula during TAVRs.

Effect of Yakson touch and mother's voice on pain and comfort level during nasal CPAP application in Turkey: A randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of Yakson touch and mother's voice on pain and comfort levels of preterm infants during nasal CPAP application. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a randomized experimental study with a control group. It included 124 premature infants (mother's voice group = 31, Yakson touch group = 31, mother's voice+ Yakson touch group= 31, control group = 31) of 28-37 weeks of age who had nasal CPAP application in the NICU of a state hospital in souteastern Turkey between April 2019 and August 2020. While the infants in the experimental group received mother's voice, Yakson touch, and mother's voice+ Yakson touch procedures before, during and after nasal CPAP application, the infants in the control group received nasal CPAP application without extra intervention. "Newborn Infant Pain Scale (NIPS)" and "Premature Infant Comfort Scale (PICS)" were used to collect data. RESULTS: Further analysis revealed that the Yakson Touch was the most beneficial intervention for reducing NIPS scores and PICS scores during and after nasal CPAP application in the experimental groups, followed by mother's voice + Yakson touch and lastly mother's voice. CONCLUSION: Yakson touch and mother's voice+Yakson touch methods, are effective in neonatal pain and comfort management during and after the nasal CPAP application.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in neonates with perinatal acute respiratory distress syndrome in China: A national, multicentre, cross-sectional study.

Background: Neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) was defined in 2017 and the epidemiological data remain unknown. Our objective was to explore aetiological factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with perinatal NARDS. Methods: A multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study was performed in 58 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China from Jan 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Neonates diagnosed with NARDS were included. Primary outcomes were aetiological factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes. Binary logistic regression and multivariate cox proportional regression were performed to identify independent predictors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and/or death or single death. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03311165. Findings: Among 70,013 admitted neonates, the incidence of NARDS was 1.44% (1005). The cumulative incidences were 65.6%, 86.7%, 94.1% within one, two and three days after birth. The median gestational age and birth weight were 36.4 weeks and 2700 g. Three main aetiological triggers included pneumonia (58.1%), asphyxia (24.3%) and early-onset sepsis (EOS) (21.3%). BPD and/or death was observed in 213 (21.2%) infants, consisting 104 (10.3%) BPD and 126 (12.6%) deaths. The numbers of mild, moderate and severe NARDS were 537 (53.4%), 286 (28.4%) and 182 (18.2%). Two or more doses of surfactant was associated with increased mortality as compared with one or less doses of surfactant (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-3.10, P = 0.006). Similarity also appeared in the comparison between EOS and non-EOS triggers (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.06-2.33, P = 0.023). Interpretation: NARDS incidence was 1.44% and the three main aetiologies were pneumonia, asphyxia and EOS. The cumulative incidences were 65.6%, 86.7%, and 94.1% within one, two and three days after birth. Our results suggested that two or more doses of surfactant increased mortality compared with one or less doses of surfactant. Funding: The National Clinical Research Center of China and Clinical Medical Study Program of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (NCRC-2019-GP-13) and Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0197).

Measures to improve in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing surgical repair for anomalous origin of left coronary artery from pulmonary artery.

Background: Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) is a rare congenital anomaly leading to progressive left ventricular dysfunction and mitral regurgitation. We conducted this study to investigate various measures to optimize the outcomes of surgical correction for ALCAPA. Materials And Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational study including consecutive patients operated for ALCAPA. The main outcomes evaluated were in-hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Independent sample t- test and Fisher's exact test were used for the analysis of continuous and categorical variables respectively. Results: 31 patients underwent surgical correction for ALCAPA during the study duration. The median age was 7.3 months with a range of 21 days to 25 months. All patients underwent coronary re-implantation with the coronary button transfer technique. There was no in-hospital mortality, the mean duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay was 117.6 hours and 10.7 days respectively. Age at admission, development of acute kidney injury after surgery, lactate levels at 12- and 24-hours post-surgery, and heart rate at ICU admission and 12-hours post-surgery were significantly associated with mechanical ventilation duration longer than 48 hours. Use of a combination of levosimendan and milrinone and elective intermittent nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation after extubation in all patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction were helpful in preventing low cardiac output and need for reintubation post-surgery respectively. Conclusion: Surgical correction for ALCAPA by coronary re-implantation has an excellent short-term outcome. Optimal postoperative management is of utmost importance for achieving the best results.

Perception of neonatology staff regarding the availability of equipment and supplies for the care of patients in need of nCPAP.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is Mexico's second leading cause of neonatal mortality. The 75% reduction in mortality due to RDS has been attributed to the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). A survey was conducted to determine the perception of the medical staff regarding the availability of nCPAP equipment and supplies in Mexican hospitals with neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS: We sent a survey via e-mail to several neonatologists in each state of the country, requesting only one response per hospital. We performed statistical analysis with SPSS software. RESULTS: We received 195 surveys from private (HPri) and public (HPub) hospitals with NICUs nationwide: 100% of HPri and 39% of HPub. More than 75% of the nursing and medical staff had received formal training in nCPAP in 11% of HPri and 5% of HPub. The perceived availability of CPAP equipment was 83.7% vs. 52.1%; nasal cannula supply, 75.5% vs. 36.3%; air/oxygen blender availability, 51.0% vs. 32.9%, in HPri and HPub, respectively. The observed differences were statistically significant. Significant differences were also found among healthcare institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of CPAP equipment and consumables between HPub and HPri is unbalanced and is lower in public institutions. Bubble CPAP is not included essential equipment in the national catalog of instruments and equipment for public hospitals, and its request is complicated. The training of CPAP staff and the availability of bubble CPAP and supplies in public hospitals should be improved.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El síndrome de dificultad respiratoria (SDR) es la segunda causa de mortalidad neonatal en México. La reducción del 75% de la mortalidad por SDR se le ha atribuido al uso de la presión positiva nasal continua de las vías respiratorias (nCPAP). Se realizó una encuesta con el objetivo de conocer la percepción del personal médico acerca de la disponibilidad del equipo e insumos para nCPAP en hospitales de México que cuenten con unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales (UCIN). MÉTODOS: La encuesta se envió por correo electrónico a varios neonatólogos de cada estado del país y se solicitó una sola respuesta por cada hospital. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el software SPSS. RESULTADOS: Se recibieron 195 encuestas respondidas tanto de hospitales privados (HPri) como públicos (HPub) que cuentan con UCIN a escala nacional: el 100% de HPri y el 39% de HPub. Más del 75% del personal de enfermería y médico recibió una capacitación formal en nCPAP en el 11% de HPri y el 5% de HPub. La percepción de disponibilidad de equipos de presión positiva continua de las vías respiratorias (CPAP) fue del 83.7% vs. el 52.1%; el abasto de cánulas nasales, del 75.5% vs. el 36.3%; la disponibilidad del mezclador aire/oxígeno, del 51.0 % vs. el 32.9%, en HPri y HPub, respectivamente. Las diferencias fueron estadísticamente significativas. También se encontraron diferencias significativas entre las instituciones de salud. CONCLUSIONES: La disponibilidad de equipo y material de consumo para CPAP entre HPub y HPri es desequilibrada, y es menor en las instituciones públicas. El CPAP burbuja no se encuentra incluido en el cuadro básico de equipo médico y se dificulta su solicitud. Debe mejorarse la capacitación del personal en CPAP y la disponibilidad de CPAP burbuja e insumos en los hospitales públicos.

A multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary support before minimally invasive surfactant administration for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (the NIV-MISA-RDS trial): Study protocol.

Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment has been developed to minimize lung damage and to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in preterm infants, especially in those with a gestational age of <30 weeks. Our hypothesis is that for preterm infants <30 weeks with potential to develop respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is non-inferior to the nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as primary respiratory support before minimal invasive surfactant administration (MISA). Methods and design: The NIV-MISA-RDS trial is planned as an unblinded, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial at 14 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China. Eligible infants are preterm infants of 24-29+6 weeks of gestational age who have spontaneous breaths at birth and require primary NIV support for RDS. Infants are randomized 1:1 to treatment with either NCPAP or NIPPV once admitted into NICUs. If an infant presents progressively aggravated respiratory distress and is clinically diagnosed as having RDS, pulmonary surfactant will be supplemented by MISA in the first 2 h of life. The primary outcome is NIV treatment failure within 72 h after birth. With a specified non-inferiority margin of 10%, using a two-sided 95% CI and 80% power, the study requires 480 infants per group (in total 960 infants). Discussion: Current evidence shows that NIV and MISA may be the most effective strategy for minimizing IMV in preterm infants with RDS. However, there are few large randomized controlled trials to compare the effectiveness of NCPAP and NIPPV as the primary respiratory support after birth and before surfactant administration. We will conduct this trial to test the hypothesis that NCPAP is not inferior to NIPPV as the initial respiratory support in reducing the use of IMV in premature infants who have spontaneous breaths after birth and who do not require intubation in the first 2 h after birth. The study will provide clinical data for the selection of the initial non-invasive ventilation mode in preterm infants with a gestational age of <30 weeks with spontaneous breaths after birth. Clinical trial registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05137340.

Efficacy and safety of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The efficacies of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) are controversial. The reasons for controversy may be the selection bias of research objects and the small sample size. Methods: Literature retrieval was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and China Science Digital Library (CSDL) databases. Inclusion criteria: (I) literatures involving subjects who were newborns with RDS; (II) studies that had established both experimental and control groups; (III) the intervention measures of the experimental and control groups were NIPPV and NCPAP, respectively; (IV) the results included the incidence of intubation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), or mortality; and (V) randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The chi-square test was applied for heterogeneity test. Publication bias assessment was conducted by funnel plot and Egger's test. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for individually randomized, parallel group trials (RoB2.0) was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCT research. Results: A total of 10 literatures were included for analysis, including 1,104 patients, 557 in the NIPPV group and 547 in the NCPAP group. Among the literatures, 2 literatures had low risk of bias, 2 literatures had high risk of bias, and the rest had uncertain risk of bias. Compared to NCPAP, NIPPV reduced the incidence of neonatal intubation in RDS [risk ratio (RR) =0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.71, Z=5.11, P<0.00001]. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity (P=0.13, I2=36%) or publication bias (P<0.05) among the studies. Compared with NCPAP, NIPPV reduced the incidence of BPD in RDS (RR =0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.91, Z=2.70, P=0.007). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity (P=0.10, I2=41%) or publication bias (P>0.05) among the studies. NIPPV reduced the neonatal mortality rate of RDS (RR =0.55, 95% CI: 0.31-0.97, Z=2.08, P=0.04). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity (P=0.20, I2=38%) or publication bias (P>0.05) among the studies. Discussion: Compared with NCPAP, NIPPV can reduce the incidence of intubation, BPD, and mortality. The conclusions need to be confirmed via high-quality RCTs.

Perception of neonatology staff regarding the availability of equipment and supplies for the care of patients in need of nCPAP / Percepción del personal de neonatología sobre la disponibilidad de equipo e insumos para la atención de pacientes con necesidad de nCPAP

Abstract Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is Mexico's second leading cause of neonatal mortality. The 75% reduction in mortality due to RDS has been attributed to the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). A survey was conducted to determine the perception of the medical staff regarding the availability of nCPAP equipment and supplies in Mexican hospitals with neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Methods: We sent a survey via e-mail to several neonatologists in each state of the country, requesting only one response per hospital. We performed statistical analysis with SPSS software. Results: We received 195 surveys from private (HPri) and public (HPub) hospitals with NICUs nationwide: 100% of HPri and 39% of HPub. More than 75% of the nursing and medical staff had received formal training in nCPAP in 11% of HPri and 5% of HPub. The perceived availability of CPAP equipment was 83.7% vs. 52.1%; nasal cannula supply, 75.5% vs. 36.3%; air/oxygen blender availability, 51.0% vs. 32.9%, in HPri and HPub, respectively. The observed differences were statistically significant. Significant differences were also found among healthcare institutions. Conclusions: The availability of CPAP equipment and consumables between HPub and HPri is unbalanced and is lower in public institutions. Bubble CPAP is not included essential equipment in the national catalog of instruments and equipment for public hospitals, and its request is complicated. The training of CPAP staff and the availability of bubble CPAP and supplies in public hospitals should be improved.

Resumen Introducción: El síndrome de dificultad respiratoria (SDR) es la segunda causa de mortalidad neonatal en México. La reducción del 75% de la mortalidad por SDR se le ha atribuido al uso de la presión positiva nasal continua de las vías respiratorias (nCPAP). Se realizó una encuesta con el objetivo de conocer la percepción del personal médico acerca de la disponibilidad del equipo e insumos para nCPAP en hospitales de México que cuenten con unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales (UCIN). Métodos: La encuesta se envió por correo electrónico a varios neonatólogos de cada estado del país y se solicitó una sola respuesta por cada hospital. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el software SPSS. Resultados: Se recibieron 195 encuestas respondidas tanto de hospitales privados (HPri) como públicos (HPub) que cuentan con UCIN a escala nacional: el 100% de HPri y el 39% de HPub. Más del 75% del personal de enfermería y médico recibió una capacitación formal en nCPAP en el 11% de HPri y el 5% de HPub. La percepción de disponibilidad de equipos de presión positiva continua de las vías respiratorias (CPAP) fue del 83.7% vs. el 52.1%; el abasto de cánulas nasales, del 75.5% vs. el 36.3%; la disponibilidad del mezclador aire/oxígeno, del 51.0 % vs. el 32.9%, en HPri y HPub, respectivamente. Las diferencias fueron estadísticamente significativas. También se encontraron diferencias significativas entre las instituciones de salud. Conclusiones: La disponibilidad de equipo y material de consumo para CPAP entre HPub y HPri es desequilibrada, y es menor en las instituciones públicas. El CPAP burbuja no se encuentra incluido en el cuadro básico de equipo médico y se dificulta su solicitud. Debe mejorarse la capacitación del personal en CPAP y la disponibilidad de CPAP burbuja e insumos en los hospitales públicos.

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus bi-level positive pressure ventilation in premature infants with respiratory failure: A retrospective study.

Objectives: Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) is a novel respiratory support mode for premature infants. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effect of nHFOV and bi-level nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in premature infants with neonatal respiratory failure (NRF) as initial noninvasive ventilation (NIV) support mode. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of preterm infants admitted to the tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. Preterm infants with the gestational age of 25-34 weeks, diagnosed with NRF, used nHFOV or BiPAP as the initial respiratory support mode were analyzed. The rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within the first seven days after birth and adverse outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Two hundred fifty-five preterm infants were analyzed (128 in nHFOV group,127 in BiPAP group). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the BiPAP group, the nHFOV group had significantly lower need for IMV within the first seven days after birth (18/128 vs. 33/127, p = 0.01) and PCO2 at 12 and 24 hours post-treatment (46.34±5.24mmHg vs. 51.18±4.83mmHg, P<0.01; 40.72±4.02mmHg vs. 42.50±3.86mmHg, P<0.01). The incidence of BPD, ROP, air leak syndromes, IVH≥ grade 3, PVL, NEC≥II stage, abdominal distension, and nasal trauma were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: nHFOV significantly reduced the need for IMV and improved the elimination of CO2 compared with BiPAP in preterm infants with NRF without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.

Noninvasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilation in Postextubation Stabilization of Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in achieving successful extubation in preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled preterm infants born at <30 weeks of gestation who received invasive ventilation. Participants were assigned at random to either NIV-NAVA or NCPAP after their first extubation from invasive ventilation. The primary outcome of the study was extubation failure within 72 hours of extubation. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) values were collected before extubation and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours after extubation. RESULTS: A total of 78 infants were enrolled, including 35 infants in the NIV-NAVA group and 35 infants in the NCPAP group. Extubation failure within 72 hours of extubation was higher in the NCPAP group than in the NIV-NAVA group (28.6% vs 8.6%; P = .031). The duration of respiratory support and incidence of severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia were similar in the 2 groups. Peak and swing Edi values were comparable before and at 1 hour after extubation, but values at 4, 12, and 24 hours after extubation were lower in the NIV-NAVA group compared with the NCPAP group. CONCLUSIONS: In the present trial, NIV-NAVA was more effective than NCPAP in preventing extubation failure in preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02590757.

Delivery Room Respiratory Stabilization of Preterm Neonates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is noninferior to NCPAP to provide DR respiratory support to preterm neonates of gestational age (GA) 28-36 wk. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial included 124 spontaneously breathing preterm neonates who developed respiratory distress soon after birth and/or had a FiO2 requirement > 0.3. Primary outcome measure was treatment failure within 24 h. The absolute risk difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a noninferiority margin of 10%. Secondary outcome variables were temperature at admission, time to treatment failure, treatment failure at 72 h, need for surfactant, intubation, duration of respiratory support, and incidences of adverse events including mortality. Intention-to-treat analysis was done in Stata software. RESULTS: Both the groups were similar in baseline characteristics. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment failure rates with HHHFNC (13.1%, n = 61) and NCPAP (11.1%, n = 63) (risk difference 2.0%, 95% CI - 9.9% to 14.07%, p = 0.73). However, noninferiority of HHHFNC to NCPAP could not be conclusively proved as the 95% CI crossed both 0 and the noninferiority margin of 10%. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: HHHFNC showed similar efficacy and safety as NCPAP irrespective of gestational age, though its noninferiority to NCPAP remained inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India, Registration no: CTRI/2019/10/021633, https://ctri.icmr.org.in/.