Single-Center Randomized Trial Comparing Feeding Jejunostomy with Nasojejunal Tube Placement in Patients Undergoing Transhiatal Esophagectomy Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition is the preferred mode of nutrition following esophagectomy. However, the preferred mode of enteral nutrition (feeding jejunostomy (FJ) vs. nasojejunal (NJ) tube) remains contentious. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we compared FJ with NJ tube feeding in terms of safety, feasibility, efficacy, and quality-of-life (QOL) parameters in Indian patients undergoing trans-hiatal esophagectomy (THE) for carcinoma esophagus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, two-armed (FJ and NJ tube), non-inferiority RCT was conducted from March 2020 to January 2024. Forty-eight patients underwent THE with posterior-mediastinal-gastric pull-up and were randomized to NJ and FJ arms (24 in each group). The postoperative complications, catheter efficacy, and QOL parameters were compared between the two groups till the 6-week follow-up. RESULTS: In this RCT, we found no significant difference in the occurrence of catheter-related complications, postoperative complication rate, catheter efficacy, and visual analog pain scores between patients with NJ tube and FJ, following THE for esophageal cancer. There was a significantly better self-reported physical domain QOL score noted in the NJ group, both at the time of discharge (44.7 ± 6.2 vs 39.8 + 5.6; p value, 0.005) and at the 6-week follow-up (55.4 ± 5.2 vs 48.6 ± 4.5; p value, < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of our RCT, we conclude that both enteral access methods (NJ vs. FJ) exhibit comparable incidences of catheter-related complications. The use of NJ tube is a viable alternative to a surgical FJ, has the benefit of early removal, and saves the distress associated with a tube per abdomen.

Comparison of the use of a spiral nasojejunal tube and transendoscopic enteral tubing in washed microbiota transplantation via the mid-gut route.

Background: Methods for washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) through the mid-gut include transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET) and manual spiral nasojejunal tube (SNT) placement have not been studied. Methods: This prospective interventional study was performed at a single centre. Patients were divided into the SNT and mid-gut TET groups based on their conditions and wishes. In the SNT group, an SNT was passively inserted into the stomach, and abdominal X-rays were taken within 24 h to confirm tube placement in the small intestine. In the mid-gut TET group, mid-gut TET was placed in the small intestine for gastroscopy. Data on the clinical efficacy of WMT, intubation time, cost, overall comfort score, adverse reactions, etc., were collected from the two groups. Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the study (SNT group (n = 40) and mid-gut TET group (n = 23)). The clinical efficacy of WMT in the SNT and mid-gut TET groups was 90 % and 95.7 %, respectively (P = 0.644). Compared with the mid-gut TET group, the SNT group showed a shorter operation time (120 s vs. 258 s, P = 0.001) and a lower average cost (641.7 yuan vs. 1702.1 yuan, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the overall comfort score or the incidence of common discomfort symptoms between the two groups. Conclusion: The different implantation methods have different advantages; compared with mid-gut TET placement, manual SNT placement provides some benefits.

Application of a downward tract adherence method in the manual bedside placement of post-pyloric tubes in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: At present, there are few studies on the technical requirements of manual bedside placement of post-pyloric tube in Intensive Care Unit patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application value of downward tract adherence method in the manual bedside placement of jejunal tubes. METHODS: In the downward group, 160 patients underwent manual bedside placement of jejunal tubes by a downward tract adherence method. In the conventional group, 144 patients were treated with conventional gas injection during the placement. The success rate, average time, and adverse reactions of the placement in the two groups were investigated and compared. RESULTS: The success rate of the placement in the downward group was significantly higher (95% vs. 75%, P< 0.001) and the average time for the successful placement was shortened (23 ± 5.91 min vs. 26 ± 5.49 min, P= 0.025) than that in the conventional group. No treatment-related adverse reactions occurred in either group, and there were also no significant differences in vital sign changes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the downward tract adherence method in the manual bedside placement of postpyloric tubes for the intensive care patients at the bedside has a higher success rate, effectivity and safety.

Efficacy and safety of enteral nutrition with jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal tube after radical resection of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Objective    To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal tube for enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer. Methods    PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM databases were searched to collect the clinical effects of jejunostomy tube versus nasojejunal nutrition tube after radical resection of esophageal cancer from inception to October 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results    Twenty-six articles were included, including 17 randomized controlled studies and 9 cohort studies, with a total of 35 808 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that: in the jejunostomy tube group, the postoperative exhaust time (MD=–4.27, 95%CI –5.87 to –2.66, P=0.001), the incidence of pulmonary infection (OR=1.39, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.82, P=0.02), incidence of tube removal (OR=0.11, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.30, P=0.001), incidence of tube blockage (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.97, P=0.04), incidence of nasopharyngeal discomfort (OR=0.04, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.13, P=0.001), the incidence of nasopharyngeal mucosal damage (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.42, P=0.008), the incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR=0.20, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.47, P=0.003) were significantly shorter or lower than those of the nasojejunal tube group. The postoperative serum albumin level (MD=5.75, 95%CI 5.34 to 6.16, P=0.001) was significantly better than that of the nasojejunal tube group. However, the intraoperative operation time of the jejunostomy tube group (MD=13.65, 95%CI 2.32 to 24.98, P=0.02) and the indent time of the postoperative nutrition tube (MD=17.81, 95%CI 12.71 to 22.91, P=0.001) were longer than those of the nasojejunal nutrition tube. At the same time, the incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction (OR=6.08, 95%CI 2.55 to 14.50, P=0.001) was significantly higher than that of the nasojejunal tube group. There were no statistical differences in the length of postoperative hospital stay or the occurrence of anastomotic fistula between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion    In the process of enteral nutrition after radical resection of esophageal cancer, jejunostomy tube has better clinical treatment effect and is more comfortable during catheterization, but the incidence of intestinal obstruction is higher than that of traditional nasojejunal tube.

Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector.

Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in length of time of NJT placement and dosage of radiation exposure using a portable imaging device with FPD versus fluoroscopy. Pediatric patients who underwent NJT placement between April 2016 and December 2018 were identified retrospectively from the clinical records. The age, sex, body weight, and height of each child at the time of the procedure as well as the procedure time, outcomes of the procedure, and dosage of radiation exposure was compared between the two groups. In 76 cases of NJT placement (41 patients), there was no significant difference in the success rate of NJT placement between the FPD (90%) and fluoroscopy groups (95%). However, the NJT placement time was significantly longer in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (488 s vs 291 s). According to our calculations, the radiation dosage was lower in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (136 µGy per procedure vs 2819 µGy per procedure). These results suggest that NJT placement using a portable imaging device with an FPD can be an effective method for children who are difficult to transport with an equal success rate and lower dosage of radiation exposure compared with conventional fluoroscopy.

Endoscopic- versus x-ray-guidance for placement of nasojejunal tubes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Nasojejunal tubes (NJTs) are increasingly used in critically ill patients. NJT insertion with endoscopic- or x-ray-guidance can be achieved with success rates above 90%. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compares the efficiency and safety of these two methods in critically ill patients. We searched Chinese and English databases for RCTs comparing endoscopy- and x-ray-guided NJT placement published up to July 5, 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan5 software to compute mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs). Eleven RCTs (n=676) were included. The endoscopic group had a higher procedure success rate (OR=2.14, 95% CI [1.19, 3.85], Z=2.52, P=0.01) and shorter insertion time (MD=-3.70 min, 95% CI [-6.90, -0.50], Z=2.27, P=0.02) than the x-ray group. NJT indwelling time and post-insertion complications were similar between groups. The x-ray group had fewer complications during placement (OR=8.08, 95% CI [3.58, 18.22], Z=5.03, P<0.00001]; on subgroup analysis, only gastrointestinal non-bleeding adverse events differed significantly between groups (OR=2.78, 95% CI [1.43, 5.39], Z=3.03, P=0.002). Visual analog scale discomfort scores were better in the x-ray group (MD=4.10, 95% CI [3.57, 4.63], Z=15.07, P<0.00001). Compared with x-ray-guided NJT placement, endoscopy-guided placement was faster, had a higher success rate, and was associated with fewer gastrointestinal non-bleeding adverse events and less discomfort during insertion. Endoscopic guidance is recommended for NJT placement in critically ill patients to improve placement efficiency. X-ray guidance is a good alternative, depending on the hospital setting, as it is convenient, economical, and potentially safer.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nasojejunal tube feeding for the prevention of pneumonia in adults who are critically ill.

BACKGROUND: Nasojejunal tube (NJT) feeding has demonstrated value in reducing pneumonia in adults who are critically ill who require enteral nutrition (EN) support. This study discusses whether EN support via NJT feeding is more cost-effective than nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding in reducing pneumonia. METHODS: A decision-tree model was created. The analysis was based on data from a health care provider in China. Model inputs were derived from published data. The end points included incremental cost per pneumonia infection avoided, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), net monetary benefit (NMB), and incremental NMB (INMB) associated with prevention of pneumonia. The uncertainty was assessed through one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The base case analysis showed that EN support via NJT feeding resulted in 0.7453 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of $3018.83 compared with NGT feeding, which resulted in 0.7354 QALYs at a cost of $4788.76. NJT feeding was better than NGT feeding, providing an INMB of $2075.09 and an ICER of -$178,813.96 per QALY gained, and the cost per pneumonia infection prevented was $16,808.51. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that NJT feeding was more cost-effective in 83.4% of the cases, with a cost below the WTP threshold. The NMB and INMB estimation for different WTP thresholds also indicated that NJT feeding is the optimal strategy. CONCLUSIONS: EN support via NJT feeding was a more cost-effective strategy than NGT feeding in preventing pneumonia in adults who are critically ill.

The effectiveness and safety of nasojejunal tube placement by gastroscopic wire drawing in children / 中国小儿急救医学

Objective:To investigate the effectiveness and safety of nasojejunal tube placement in children by gastroscopic drafting method.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of children with nasojejunal tube placement from January 2016 to December 2021 in our hospital, and compared the operation time, successful rate and complications of nasojejunal tube placement in the gastroscopic wire drawing method retraction group(observation group)and the gastroscopic foreign body clamp placement method placement group(control group).Results:All of the 167 cases, 65 cases were in observation group and 102 cases in control group.There were no significant differences in sex and age between two groups( P>0.05). The operation time was(6.7±0.8)min in observation group and(8.2±1.3)min in control group, and the difference was statistically significant( t=8.312, P<0.001). The successful rate was 100% in observation group and 96% in control group.One child in control group complicated with the mucosal erosion and bleeding in the duodenal bulb, while the observation group with no erosion, bleeding, perforation, and other complications. Conclusion:The gastroscopic wire drawing method of nasojejunal tube placement has a shorter operation time, higher successful rates, and lower complication rates, which is significantly superior to the gastroscopic foreign body clamp placement method.

Efficacy of different nutritional therapentic methods on nutritional improvement for pancreatitis patients intolerant to oral feeding / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of providing nasogastric (NG), nasojejunal (NJ), and parenteral nutrition (PN) support to pancreatitis patients who were intolerant to oral feeding.Methods:One hundred pancreatitis patients who were intolerant to oral feeding treated at the Xuanwu Hospital of the Capital Medical University from October 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively studied. They were divided into three groups based on the nutritional support given to them: the NG group, NJ group, and PN group. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ), nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002), hemoglobin, albumin, pre-albumin and other clinical data were recorded and compared among the three groups.Results:After nutrition support treatments, the hemoglobin, albumin and pre-albumin levels were significantly better than before giving nutrition support, and the APACHE Ⅱ scores were significantly improved in all the groups. The NRS2002 scores were significantly better in the NJ group ( Z=2.28, P=0.023) and the NG group ( Z=1.99, P=0.046). With compared to the PN group, the albumin and pre-albumin levels were significantly higher in the NG and NJ groups, and the NRS2002 score after giving nutrition support treatment was significantly lower ( P<0.05). Compared with the PN group, the APACHE Ⅱ score ( t=2.18) and the hemoglobin levels ( t=2.04) were significantly better in the NJ group ( P<0.05). The overall incidence of complications in the NJ group was 41.2% (14/34), which was significantly lower than the NG group [78.8%(26/33), χ 2=5.41, P=0.020] and the PN group [66.7% (22/33), χ 2=4.35, P=0.037]. Conclusion:Enteral nutrition support through NG and NJ are better than PN in acute pancreatitis patients who were intolerant to oral feeding.

Nursing effect of Nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the nursing effect of nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement. METHODS: 94 patients who need to place nasogastric tube and nasojejunal tube to establish enteral nutrition were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n=49) and control group (n=45). The patients in the observation group received nasogastric tube placement and jejunal nutrition tube placement, and the patients in the control group received general gastroscope and placed gastric tube and jejunal nutrition tube through mouth. Success rate of catheterization, catheter pain score, satisfaction score, vital signs, completion time of catheterization, and complication were collected. RESULTS: the fluctuation of vital signs in control group was significantly higher than that in observation group. There was statistical significance between two groups in vital signs after intervention (P<0.05), mainly manifested in the heart rate, breathing and pulse pressure difference. On the other hand, there was no statistical significance between two groups in pulse oxygen after nursing intervention (P>0.05). The catheter pain score is obviously improved in the observation group compared with control group after intervention. The improvement score of satisfaction in the observation group was 91.47±7.65 points, and that in the control group was 83.64±5.24 points. The completion time of catheterization was improved in the observation group compared with control group. There was statistical significance between two groups in satisfaction score and completion time of catheterization (P<0.05). The rate of abdominal distention and diarrhea in the control group was higher than that in the observation group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement has the advantages of simple and fast, short operation time, high success rate and few complications. It is the first choice of intubation method for enteral nutrition support treatment.

Life-Threatening Malnutrition in Very Severe ME/CFS.

Very severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), (also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) can lead to problems with nutrition and hydration. The reasons can be an inability to swallow, severe gastrointestinal problems tolerating food or the patient being too debilitated to eat and drink. Some patients with very severe ME will require tube feeding, either enterally or parenterally. There can often be a significant delay in implementing this, due to professional opinion, allowing the patient to become severely malnourished. Healthcare professionals may fail to recognize that the problems are a direct consequence of very severe ME, preferring to postulate psychological theories rather than addressing the primary clinical need. We present five case reports in which delay in instigating tube feeding led to severe malnutrition of a life-threatening degree. This case study aims to alert healthcare professionals to these realities.

Nutrición en pancreatitis aguda: nuevos conceptos para un viejo problema / Nutrition in acute pancreatitis: new concepts for an old problem

Resumen El manejo de la nutrición en pancreatitis aguda ha sido cuestión de debate. Durante muchos años el concepto de reposo pancreático fue generalizado y aceptado en el manejo de la pancreatitis aguda. Actualmente se conoce que la nutrición temprana permite mantener la integridad de la barrera intestinal, que previene la aparición de complicaciones infeccionas y se asocia con una menor estancia hospitalaria, menos complicaciones y un mejor pronóstico. En esta revisión se discuten las principales ventajas de la nutrición temprana en pancreatitis aguda, la seguridad de la misma y la vía de administración.

Abstract Nutrition management in acute pancreatitis has been a matter of debate worldwide. For many years, the concept of pancreatic rest was widespread and accepted to treat acute pancreatitis. However, current knowledge of early nutrition allows maintaining the intestinal barrier's integrity, preventing the occurrence of infectious complications, which is associated with a shorter hospital stay, fewer complications, and better prognosis. This review presents the main advantages of early nutrition in acute pancreatitis, its safety, and the route of administration.

The "Silk Road": A novel method for inserting transpyloric feeding tubes in low resource settings.

INTRODUCTION: Transpyloric tube (TPT) feeding is used in a multitude of conditions including gastroesophageal reflux disease. We here describe a new simple method to insert TPTs. METHODS: 6 French feeding tube is premeasured nose to xiphisternum, and then another 7cm of length is added and 3-5 silk (4-0) ties are applied to the end of the tube spaced 0.5-1cm apart. The knots are placed in different radial directions, and multiple throws are placed on each knot so as to add bulkiness. The tube is then inserted transnasally to the premeasured length and secured. The child is given a single dose of metoclopramide and placed on his right side for 4h. A plain abdominal x-ray is then performed to confirm adequate TP placement. Following correct placement the patient is tube fed with small volumes every 15-20min. Descriptive data was prospectively collected. RESULTS: 34 patients were recruited, median age 3.5months. All presented with vomiting, and 26 had failure to thrive. 24had successful TP tube placement from the first attempt, 6 from the second attempt, 2 on third attempt, and in 2 placement was unsuccessful. In 28 patients vomiting almost stopped completely. 9 patients had fundoplication, and 1 had gastrostomy placement. 3 patients died during the study because of unknown reasons. CONCLUSION: The silk tie technique is a safe and simple way to treat persistent vomiting and may prove useful in low resourced environments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Endoscopic Insertion of Nasojejunal Feeding Tube at Bedside for Critically Ill Patients: Relationship between Tube Position and Intragastric Countercurrent of Contrast Medium.

Background and Oblectives: We evaluated the success rate of endoscopically positioned nasojejunal feeding tubes and the intragastric countercurrent of contrast medium thereafter. METHOD: This retrospective observational study investigated patients who were admitted to a single intensive care unit and required endoscopic placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube between January 2010 and June 2016. The feeding tube was grasped with forceps via a transoral endoscope and inserted into the duodenum or jejunum. Thereafter, we assessed the position of the tube and the intragastric countercurrent using abdominal radiography with contrast medium. RESULTS: The tube tip was inserted at the jejunum and the duodenal fourth portion in 55.8 and 33.6% of patients, respectively. The tip of the inserted tube had moved into the jejunum of 71.7% of patients by the following day. The countercurrent rate was significantly lower among patients with a tube inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal than among those with tubes inserted more proximally (8.4 vs. 45.4%, p = 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic insertion and positioning of a nasojejunal feeding tube seemed effective because the rate of tube insertion into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal was about 90%. The findings of intragastric countercurrents indicated that feeding tubes should be inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or beyond to prevent vomiting and the aspiration of enteral nutrients.

The learning curve in blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tubes: data from a multicentre, prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to quantify the learning curve for the blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube in critically ill patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 127 consecutive experiences of three intensivists who performed comparable procedures of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube subsequent to failed self-propelled transpyloric migration in a multicentre study. Each intensivist's cases were divided chronologically into two groups for analysis. The assessment of the learning curve was based on efficiency and safety outcomes. RESULTS: All intensivists achieved postpyloric placement for over 80% of their patients. The junior intensivist showed major improvement in both efficiency and safety outcomes, and the learning curve for both outcomes was approximately 20 cases. The junior intensivist showed a significant increase in the success rate of proximal jejunum placement and demonstrated a substantial decrease in the major adverse tube-associated events rate. The time to insertion significantly decreased in each intensivist as case experience accumulated. CONCLUSIONS: Blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube involves a significant learning curve, indicating that this technique could be readily acquired by intensivists with no previous experience using an adequate professional training programme.

Experiences with fecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infections via upper gastrointestinal tract.

Dramatic changes in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections have been reported from the western world in the past decade. The proportion of severe cases is significantly elevating and clinicians now have to contend with the problem of additional and more frequent episodes of recurrences including an upward trend in the mortality rate. This situation led us to investigate the possibility of the fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). An amount of 100 ml of fecal microbiota solution was instilled into a nasojejunal (NJ) tube in 16 cases and into a nasogastric (NG) tube in 44 cases. In all of the cases, where the solution was instilled via nasojejunal tubes, the symptoms resolved within 24 h. We did not note any recurrences in this group. When the material was flushed in through nasogastric tubes, the symptoms resolved in 39 (88.64%) cases within 24 h. In this group, we have experienced a recurrent episode of C. difficile infection in five (11.36%) cases. Three of them were cured with a second transplantation. We have found that in our practice the upper gastrointestinal tract methods had the primary cure rate of 91.67%, whereas the secondary cure rate is 96.67%. When we compared the NJ and NG methods, we have found that the differences in the outcomes are not significant statistically (p = 0.3113 using Fisher's exact probability test). In conclusion, FMT proved to be very effective, particularly in recurrent infections and in cases where conventional treatment had failed.

Establishing Decision Trees for Predicting Successful Postpyloric Nasoenteric Tube Placement in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of prokinetic agents, the overall success rate for postpyloric placement via a self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube is quite low. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in the intensive care units of 11 university hospitals from 2006 to 2016 among adult patients who underwent self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube insertion. Success was defined as postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement confirmed by abdominal x-ray scan 24 hours after tube insertion. Chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), simple classification and regression trees (SimpleCart), and J48 methodologies were used to develop decision tree models, and multiple logistic regression (LR) methodology was used to develop an LR model for predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of these models. RESULTS: Successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement was confirmed in 427 of 939 patients enrolled. For predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement, the performance of the 3 decision trees was similar in terms of the AUCs: 0.715 for the CHAID model, 0.682 for the SimpleCart model, and 0.671 for the J48 model. The AUC of the LR model was 0.729, which outperformed the J48 model. CONCLUSION: Both the CHAID and LR models achieved an acceptable discrimination for predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement and were useful for intensivists in the setting of self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube insertion.

Transgastric decompression using a newly developed nasojejunal tube in a postgastrostomy patient with adhesive small bowel obstruction.

For postgastrostomy patients suffering from adhesive small bowel obstruction, transgastric decompression with a multiluminal nasojejunal tube is an effective and more comfortable alternative to conventional nasal tubing using an ileus tube.

Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients. METHODS: This prospective, tricentric, observational study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three tertiary hospitals. A total of 127 consecutive patients with failed spontaneous transpyloric spiral tube migration despite using prokinetic agents and still required enteral nutrition for more than 3 days were included. The spiral tube was inserted postpylorically using the blind bedside technique. All patients received metoclopramide intravenously prior to tube insertion. The exact tube tip position was determined by radiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of postpyloric spiral tube placement. Secondary efficacy endpoints were success rate of a spiral tube placed in the third portion of the duodenum (D3) or beyond, success rate of placement in the proximal jejunum, time to insertion, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Safety endpoints were metoclopramide-related and major adverse tube-associated events. RESULTS: In 81.9% of patients, the spiral feeding tubes were placed postpylorically; of these, 55.1% were placed in D3 or beyond and 33.9% were placed in the proximal jejunum, with a median time to insertion of 14 min and an average number of attempts of 1.4. The mean length of insertion was 95.6 cm. The adverse event incidence was 26.0%, and no serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube, as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients, is safe and effective. This technique may facilitate the early initiation of postpyloric feeding in the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPN-16008206 . Registered on 1 April 2016.