Comparison of clevidipine vs nicardipine in the treatment of hypertensive urgency and emergency in critically ill patients.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Evidence has suggested that clevidipine may provide faster blood pressure (BP) reduction with less volume than nicardipine in stroke and cardiothoracic surgery patients, but its use in hypertensive crises has not been well established. The primary objective of this study was to compare the treatment success of clevidipine and nicardipine in hypertensive crisis. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients who received either clevidipine or nicardipine for treatment of hypertensive crisis. The primary outcome was the time from infusion start to attainment of goal BP, defined as the higher value of the guideline-directed 25% reduction in BP or the physician-ordered goal. Secondary outcomes were the time from infusion start to guideline-directed 25% reduction in BP, drug and total volume intake, the time from order entry to BP goal attainment, the number of BP and heart rate excursions, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and study medication cost. RESULTS: In total, 182 patients were included in the study (103 receiving nicardipine and 79 receiving clevidipine). Time to goal BP was similar between the groups (35 vs 33 minutes for clevidipine vs nicardipine, respectively; P = 0.37). Time to guideline-directed 25% reduction was also similar (P = 0.42). Volume from study drug was significantly less with clevidipine (222 vs 518 mL; P = 0.01); however, the total volume received in the ICU was similar (3,370 vs 3,383 mL; P = 0.43). Percent time in the goal BP range was similar (43.1% vs 42.3%). The cost of clevidipine was $199.37 per vial (based on the average wholesale price as of June 2023). This cost was 682% higher than that for a bag of nicardipine. CONCLUSION: Time to goal BP was similar for clevidipine and nicardipine in this population. Any decreases in medication-associated volume with clevidipine were no longer evident when all volume sources were considered. These results show that clevidipine may not provide meaningful benefit in this heterogenous population. The difference in cost does not seem justified given the lack of improvement in clinically relevant outcomes.

Optimizing nicardipine dosage for effective control of pituitrin-induced hypertension in laparoscopic myomectomy undergoing total intravenous anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of nicardipine for treating pituitrin-induced hypertension during laparoscopic myomectomy, providing guidance for the management of intraoperative blood pressure in such patients. METHODS: Among the initial 40 participants assessed, 24 underwent elective laparoscopic myomectomy. A sequential up-and-down method was employed to ascertain the ED50 of nicardipine based on its antihypertensive efficacy. Nicardipine was initially administered at 6 µg/kg following the diagnosis of pituitrin-induced hypertension in the first patient. Dosing adjustments were made to achieve the desired antihypertensive effect, restoring systolic blood pressure and heart rate to within ± 20% of baseline within 120 s. The dosing increment or reduction was set at 0.5 µg/kg for effective or ineffective responses, respectively. The ED50 and ED95 of nicardipine were calculated using Probit regression by Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) to establish dose-response curves and confidence intervals. RESULTS: 24 patients were included for analysis finally. The ED50 and ED95 of nicardipine for blood pressure control after pituitrin injection were determined. The study found that the ED50 of nicardipine for treating pituitrin-induced hypertension was 4.839 µg/kg (95% CI: 4.569-5.099 µg/kg), and the ED95 was estimated at 5.308 µg/kg (95% CI: 5.065-6.496 µg/kg). Nicardipine effectively mitigated the hypertensive response caused by pituitrin without inducing significant tachycardia or hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Nicardipine effectively controlled blood pressure after pituitrin injection during laparoscopic myomectomy, with ED50 and ED95 values established. This research highlights the potential utility of nicardipine in addressing hypertensive responses induced by pituitrin, particularly in clinical settings where pituitrin is routinely administered.

Nicardipine constant rate infusion alleviates the cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine infusions without affecting the minimal alveolar concentration in sevoflurane-anesthetized dogs.

Two randomized crossover trials evaluated the effects of nicardipine constant rate infusion (CRI) on 1) the anesthetic potency of sevoflurane and 2) the ability to attenuate dexmedetomidine-induced cardiovascular depression in anesthetized dogs. First, six healthy Beagle dogs weighing 11.7 ± 0.9 kg were allocated to one of three treatments that administered a CRI of carrier (saline) or dexmedetomidine 0.5 or 3.0 µg/kg/h following a loading dose. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane was determined utilizing electric stimuli before and after the loading dose of nicardipine (20 µg/kg intravenously for 10 min), followed by CRI at 40 µg/kg/h with 60 min of equilibration. Subsequently, cardiovascular and blood gas variables were evaluated in another trial under sevoflurane anesthesia at the individual 1.5 MAC. After baseline measurements, the dogs were assigned to two treatments (dexmedetomidine CRI at 0.5 or 3.0 µg/kg/h following a loading dose) with sevoflurane doses adjusted to 1.5 times of MAC equivalent, and the measurements were repeated every 15 min for 120 min. After 60 min, nicardipine CRI at 40 µg/kg/h with a loading dose was added to the dexmedetomidine CRI. Dexmedetomidine infusions significantly decreased the sevoflurane MAC but nicardipine did not significantly alter the MAC either with or without dexmedetomidine CRI in dogs. Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently decreased the cardiac index and increased the systemic vascular resistance index; these effects were fully counteracted by concomitant nicardipine CRI. Nicardipine CRI can be useful for controlling the cardiovascular depression elicited by dexmedetomidine in anesthetized dogs without affecting the anesthetic potency of sevoflurane.

First use of intraventricular nicardipine in a pediatric patient with vasospasm secondary to meningitis: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral vasospasm is commonly associated with adult aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage but can develop in children. The standard vasospasm treatment includes induced hypertension, avoidance of hypovolemia, systemic use of the calcium channel blocker (CCB) nimodipine, and cerebral angiography for intraarterial therapy. Emerging treatments in adults, such as intraventricular CCB administration, have not been investigated in children. This study demonstrates the successful use of an intraventricular CCB in a pediatric patient with refractory vasospasm secondary to meningitis. OBSERVATIONS: A 12-year-old female presented with Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis and ventriculitis with refractory symptomatic cerebral vasospasm. She received a 5-day course of intrathecal nicardipine through an existing external ventricular drain. Her clinical status, transcranial Doppler studies, and radiography improved. Treatment was well tolerated. LESSONS: Pediatric vasospasm is uncommon and potentially devastating. The management of vasospasm in adults occurs frequently. Principles of this management are adapted to pediatric care given the rarity of vasospasm in children. The use of intraventricular nicardipine has been reported in the care of adults with level 3 evidence. It has not been adequately reported in children with refractory vasospasm. Here, the first use of intraventricular nicardipine in treating pediatric cerebral vasospasm in the setting of meningitis is described and highlighted.

Cisternal nicardipine for prevention of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comparative retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Intrathecal vasoactive drugs have been proposed in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) to manage cerebral vasospasm (CV). We analyzed the efficacy of intracisternal nicardipine compared to intraventricular administration to a control group (CG) to determine its impact on delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and functional outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the need for intra-arterial angioplasties and the safety profile. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all adult patients admitted for a high modified Fisher grade aSAH between January 2015 and April 2022. All patients with significant radiological CV were included. Three groups of patients were defined based on the CV management: cisternal nicardipine (CN), ventricular nicardipine (VN), and no intrathecal nicardipine (control group). RESULTS: Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria. Eleven patients received intracisternal nicardipine, 18 intraventricular nicardipine, and 41 belonged to the control group. No cases of DCI were observed in the CN group (p = 0.02). Patients with intracisternal nicardipine had a reduced number of intra-arterial angioplasties when compared to the control group (p = 0.03). The safety profile analysis showed no difference in complications across the three groups. Intrathecal (ventricular or cisternal) nicardipine therapy improved functional outcomes at 6 months (p = 0.04) when compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Administration of intrathecal nicardipine for moderate to severe CV reduces the rate of DCI and improved long-term functional outcomes in patients with high modified Fisher grade aSAH. This study also showed a relative benefit of cisternal over intraventricular nicardipine, thereby reducing the number of angioplasties performed in the post-treatment phase. However, these preliminary results should be confirmed with future prospective studies.

Direct investigations of the effects of nicardipine on calcium channels of astrocytes by Atomic Force Microscopy.

Calcium channel blockers (CCB) of astrocytes can blockade the calcium ions entry through the voltage gated calcium channels (VGCC), and is widely used in the diseases related with VGCC of astrocytes. But many aspects of the interaction mechanisms between the CCB and VGCC of astrocytes still remain unclear due to the limited resolution of the approaches. Herein the effects of the nicardipine (a type of CCB) on VGCC of astrocytes were investigated at very high spatial, force and electrical resolution by multiple modes of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) directly. The results reveal that after the addition of nicardipine, the recognition signals of VGCC disappeared; the specific unbinding forces vanished; the conductivity of the astrocytes decreased (the current decreased about 2.9 pA and the capacitance was doubled); the surface potential of the astrocytes reduced about 14.2 mV. The results of electrical properties investigations are consistent with the simulation experiments. The relations between these biophysical and biochemical properties of VGCC have been discussed. All these demonstrate that the interactions between nicardipine and VGCC have been studied at nanometer spatial resolution, at picoNewton force resolution and very high electrical signal resolution (pA in current, pF in capacitance and 0.1 mV in surface potential) level. The approaches are considered to be high resolution and high sensitivity, and will be helpful and useful in the further investigations of the effects of other types of CCB on ion channels, and will also be helpful in the investigations of mechanisms and therapy of ion channelopathies.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling to Predict CYP3A-Mediated Drug Interaction between Saxagliptin and Nicardipine: Bridging Rat-to-Human Extrapolation.

The aim of this study was to predict the cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A)-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between saxagliptin and nicardipine using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Initially, in silico and in vitro parameters were gathered from experiments or the literature to construct PBPK models for each drug in rats. These models were integrated to predict the DDIs between saxagliptin, metabolized via CYP3A2, and nicardipine, exhibiting CYP3A inhibitory activity. The rat DDI PBPK model was completed by optimizing parameters using experimental rat plasma concentrations after co-administration of both drugs. Following co-administration in Sprague-Dawley rats, saxagliptin plasma concentration significantly increased, resulting in a 2.60-fold rise in AUC, accurately predicted by the rat PBPK model. Subsequently, the workflow of the rat PBPK model was applied to humans, creating a model capable of predicting DDIs between the two drugs in humans. Simulation from the human PBPK model indicated that nicardipine co-administration in humans resulted in a nearly unchanged AUC of saxagliptin, with an approximate 1.05-fold change, indicating no clinically significant changes and revealing a lack of direct translation of animal interaction results to humans. The animal-to-human PBPK model extrapolation used in this study could enhance the reliability of predicting drug interactions in clinical settings where DDI studies are challenging.

Effects of intravenous nicardipine followed by oral labetalol in combination with nifedipine controlled-release tablet on severe peripartum hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of intravenous nicardipine as initial therapy and oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet as subsequent treatment of severe peripartum hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intravenous nicardipine was delivered as the initial treatment, after the target blood pressure (BP) had been achieved, oral labetalol was used to maintain the target BP. If oral labetalol failed to maintain the target BP, oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet was used. RESULTS: A total number of 131 patients were enrolled. The target BP (BP < 140/90 mmHg) was achieved in all patients within 60 minutes by intravenous nicardipine. After receiving labetalol orally, the target BP was maintained in nine patients. However, in 104 patients, we had to combine oral labetalol and nifedipine controlled-release tablet due to re-elevation of their systolic BP to 140-159 mmHg. In 18 patients, we restarted intravenous nicardipine because their systolic BP re-elevated above 160 mm Hg. Among the 104 patients who received oral labetalol and nifedipine controlled-release tablet, the target BP was achieved and maintained in 96 patients, and eight patients had to restart nicardipine. Of the total number of 26 patients in whom intravenous nicardipine was resumed, the target BP was successfully maintained in 22 patients with oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous nicardipine rapidly and safely lowered severe peripartum hypertension. As subsequent therapy, oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet protocol may be applied to effectively maintain a target BP.

In vitro models for neuropathic pain phenotypic screening in brain therapeutics.

The discovery of brain therapeutics faces a significant challenge due to the low translatability of preclinical results into clinical success. To address this gap, several efforts have been made to obtain more translatable neuronal models for phenotypic screening. These models allow the selection of active compounds without predetermined knowledge of drug targets. In this review, we present an overview of various existing models within the field, examining their strengths and limitations, particularly in the context of neuropathic pain research. We illustrate the usefulness of these models through a comparative review in three crucial areas: i) the development of novel phenotypic screening strategies specifically for neuropathic pain, ii) the validation of the models for both primary and secondary screening assays, and iii) the use of the models in target deconvolution processes.

Naphazoline intoxication managed with minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring.

Naphazoline, a nonspecific alpha-adrenoceptor stimulant, is a potent vasoconstrictor used in nasal sprays, eye drops, and over-the-counter antiseptics. Naphazoline intoxication increases afterload by constricting the peripheral arteries, which can lead to complications including multiple organ failure. Although phentolamine, a nonselective alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, and nicardipine, a calcium channel blocker, are used for the treatment of naphazoline intoxication, no established administration protocols currently exist. We present the case of a 32-year-old male with depression who ingested 150 mL of an antiseptic containing 0.1% naphazoline (equivalent to 150 mg of naphazoline). Five hours after ingestion, the patient was admitted to hospital exhibiting signs of naphazoline intoxication, such as bradycardia (46 beats/min), blood pressure of 166/122 mmHg, and peripheral cyanosis. We used the FloTrac™/EV1000™ system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA), a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system, to monitor systemic vascular resistance. The systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) was elevated (4457 dyne.s/cm5/m2; nomal range: 1970-2390 dyne.s/cm5/m2) upon admission and initial treatment with continuous intravenous infusion of phentolamine led to SVRI normalization within 2 h. With the goal of maintaining SVRI normalization, continuous infusion with nicardipine was then started. At 10 h after treatment initiation, the nicardipine dose peaked at 9 mg/h (1.9 µg/kg/min). Treatment was discontinued 8 h later, and the patient was discharged on the fourth day without sequelae. In conclusion, the use of a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system to track vascular resistance can effectively guide the dosing of phentolamine or nicardipine in the treatment of naphazoline intoxication.

Utility of nicardipine in the management of hypertensive crises in adults with reduced ejection fractions.

BACKGROUND: Nicardipine is commonly used in the management of hypertensive crises, except those involving cardiac contractility defects despite its ability to reduce afterload and pulmonary congestion. Consequently, there is limited literature evaluating nicardipine's role for this indication. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nicardipine in adults with reduced ejection fractions presenting with acute heart failure with hypertension (AHF-H). METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at an academic Level 1 trauma center with an annual Emergency Department (ED) volume surpassing 100,000. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of nicardipine in adults with reduced ejection fractions presenting to the ED with AHF-H. Efficacy was determined by achievement of the physician prescribed blood pressure target range. The primary safety endpoints included the number of individuals who experienced bradycardia (< 60 beats per minute, bpm) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure, SBP, < 90 mmHg) while receiving nicardipine and for up to 15 min after its discontinuation. Patients were included if they were ≥ 18 years of age, received a continuous intravenous nicardipine infusion within six hours of presenting to the ED, and had an ejection fraction ≤ 40% per an echocardiogram obtained within three months of the study visit. Pregnant and incarcerated patients were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 500 patient charts reviewed, 38 met inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile, IQR) ejection fraction and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were 35% (25-40) and 731 pg/nL (418-3277), respectively. The median baseline heart rate and SBP were 90 bpm and 193 mmHg, respectively. The median physician specified SBP goal was 160 mmHg and all patients met this endpoint in a median time of 18 min. One (2.6%) patient in the total population developed both hypotension and bradycardia. This patient had an ejection fraction of 20%, was intubated, and received nicardipine in addition to esmolol for an aortic dissection without experiencing an adverse event until 30 min after dexmedetomidine was initiated. CONCLUSION: In this non-interventional study evaluating the use of nicardipine in patients with reduced ejection fractions presenting to the ED with AHF-H, nicardipine was found to be safe and effective. To our knowledge this is the largest study to date evaluating nicardipine in this patient population and positively contributes to the existing literature.

A randomized controlled trial: Comparing blood pressure reduction in hyperacute phase of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage by continuous nicardipine infusion with or without a preceding nicardipine bolus dose.

Objectives: To determine whether addition of an intravenous bolus dose before continuous nicardipine infusion would improve blood pressure reduction in the hyperacute phase in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: One academic emergency department (ED) in Bangkok, Thailand. Participants: Adult patients with spontaneous ICH presented to the ED between June 30, 2022, and July 15, 2023. Interventions: The bolus group (n = 31) received an intravenous bolus dose of nicardipine before nicardipine continuous infusion, whereas the non-bolus group (n = 31) was given a placebo and nicardipine continuous infusion. Main outcomes: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) within the first hour (being measured every 5 min), neurological deterioration, and infusion dosage at 60 min were assessed. Results: Basic characteristic features including the mean baseline SBP were not significantly different between the two groups. At 10 min after treatment initiation, the bolus group had a significant decrease in SBP (32.1 ± 13.6 vs 22.3 ± 18.5 mmHg; p-value = 0.020). Moreover, the target SBP of 180 mmHg could be achieved within 10 min in the bolus group compared with 15 min in the non-bolus group. However, the overall mean SBPs were not significantly different, with 152 ± 12 mmHg in the bolus group compared with 150 ± 15 mmHg in the non-bolus group (p-value = 0.564). None of the patients in both groups had neurological deterioration over the first hour of the treatment. The infusion dosages of nicardipine at 1 h were 6.2 mg/h (5.9, 7.7 mg/h) and 6.8 mg/h (5.9, 8.4 mg/h) in the bolus and non-bolus groups, respectively (p-value = 0.618). Conclusions: Administering a 1-mg bolus dose of nicardipine before continuous nicardipine infusion notably reduces SBP at 10 min. However, the overall SBP does not exhibit a significant decline during the hyperacute phase of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

A randomized, single ascending dose safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics study of NicaPlant® in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients undergoing clipping.

Introduction: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Post-hemorrhagic vasospasm with neurological deterioration is a major concern in this context. NicaPlant®, a modified release formulation of the calcium channel blocker nicardipine, has shown vasodilator efficacy preclinically and a similar formulation known as NPRI has shown anti-vasospasm activity in aSAH patients under compassionate use. Research question: The study aimed to assess pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NicaPlant® pellets to prevent vasospasm after clip ligation in aSAH. Material and methods: In this multicenter, controlled, randomized, dose escalation trial we assessed the safety and tolerability of NicaPlant®. aSAH patients treated by clipping were randomized to receive up to 13 NicaPlant® implants, similarly to the dose of NPRIs previous used, or standard of care treatment. Results: Ten patients across four dose groups were treated with NicaPlant® (3-13 implants) while four patients received standard of care. 45 non-serious and 13 serious adverse events were reported, 4 non-serious adverse events and 5 serious adverse events assessed a probable or possible causal relationship to the investigational medical product. Across the NicaPlant® groups there was 1 case of moderate vasospasm, while in the standard of care group there were 2 cases of severe vasospasm. Discussion and conclusion: The placement of NicaPlant® during clip ligation of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm raised no safety concern. The dose of 10 NicaPlant® implants was selected for further clinical studies.

Real world single center experience with saphenous vein grafts interventions: should filters be filtered out?

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) can be challenging due to no reflow phenomenon from distal embolization of debris and microvascular vasoconstriction, resulting in myocardial injury post-procedure. Guidelines promote the use of distal embolic protection devices (EPD) to protect the distal arterial bed during SVG PCI. However, this approach has shown less-than-optimal results in many studies. We report our data using the Borgess protocol [prophylactic intracoronary (IC) nicardipine injection and direct stenting], as an alternative to EPDs in a large series of SVG interventions. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cohort study of our single center experience with SVG interventions between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [a composite of death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 30 days post-procedure. RESULTS: There were 424 consecutive SVG interventions performed during the study period, and 76% of cases presented with acute coronary syndrome. Full adherence to the Borgess protocol was observed in 36% of cases; IC nicardipine was utilized in 72% of cases. MACE rate was 3.5% at 30 days driven primarily by MI (2.6%). CONCLUSION: The Borgess protocol approach to vein graft interventions proved good outcomes when compared to SVG PCI in randomized trials utilizing EPDs. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature and single center experience.

New medicines for spontaneous preterm birth prevention and preterm labour management: landscape analysis of the medicine development pipeline.

BACKGROUND: There are few medicines in clinical use for managing preterm labor or preventing spontaneous preterm birth from occurring. We previously developed two target product profiles (TPPs) for medicines to prevent spontaneous preterm birth and manage preterm labor. The objectives of this study were to 1) analyse the research and development pipeline of medicines for preterm birth and 2) compare these medicines to target product profiles for spontaneous preterm birth to identify the most promising candidates. METHODS: Adis Insight, Pharmaprojects, WHO international clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP), PubMed and grant databases were searched to identify candidate medicines (including drugs, dietary supplements and biologics) and populate the Accelerating Innovations for Mothers (AIM) database. This database was screened for all candidates that have been investigated for preterm birth. Candidates in clinical development were ranked against criteria from TPPs, and classified as high, medium or low potential. Preclinical candidates were categorised by product type, archetype and medicine subclass. RESULTS: The AIM database identified 178 candidates. Of the 71 candidates in clinical development, ten were deemed high potential (Prevention: Omega-3 fatty acid, aspirin, vaginal progesterone, oral progesterone, L-arginine, and selenium; Treatment: nicorandil, isosorbide dinitrate, nicardipine and celecoxib) and seven were medium potential (Prevention: pravastatin and lactoferrin; Treatment: glyceryl trinitrate, retosiban, relcovaptan, human chorionic gonadotropin and Bryophyllum pinnatum extract). 107 candidates were in preclinical development. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides a drug-agnostic approach to assessing the potential of candidate medicines for spontaneous preterm birth. Research should be prioritised for high-potential candidates that are most likely to meet the real world needs of women, babies, and health care professionals.

Therapeutic and safety outcomes of intracoronary nicardipine in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review.

Aim: This systematic review aimed to shed light on the efficacy of intracoronary (IC) nicardipine in treating no reflow with CAD undergoing revascularization. Methods: Literature search was performed on databases with following eligibility criteria: adult patients with CAD; clinical trials or observational studies; IC nicardipine as intervention; therapeutic and safety outcome reported. Results: A total of 1249 papers were yielded during the literature search. Of these, 11 studies were finalized for this systematic review. Complete restoration of TIMI 3 flow was observed in 98.6% of the patients receiving IC nicardipine. A significant increase in the CBF after infusion of IC nicardipine (p < 0.05) was also observed. Conclusion: IC nicardipine significantly increases CBF and decreases coronary vascular resistance.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a condition that results in the narrowing or blockage of heart arteries. Arteries are blood vessels that bring oxygen-rich blood from your heart to the rest of your body's cells. We aimed to evaluate the effects of intracoronary (IC) nicardipine, a drug that blocks calcium from entering the muscle cells and blood vessels of the heart, which causes the vessels to relax and widen, allowing for blood to flow more easily, on a phenomenon known as coronary slow flow (CSF). CSF is defined as a delayed widening of the blood vessels of the heart. CSF or the no reflow phenomenon is a major negative complication associated with surgical procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), both of which are used to open up blocked arteries. The systematic search identified studies that evaluated the effect of IC nicardipine in patient during CAD treatment, undergoing PCI, CABG, or having confirmed or suspected narrowing of the aortic valve or one of the four valves of the heart, which results in restricted blood flow from the heart to the body. From the results of studies discussed in the review, it can be concluded that IC nicardipine significantly increases blood flow to the heart and can help prevent the no reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing PCI. Nicardipine proved to be a safe and effective option in the management of complications such as no reflow in patients receiving therapies to restore blood flow following CAD.

Precipitation of sugammadex with nicardipine and labetalol: A laboratory research.

There is a paucity of clinical data about whether sugammadex forms precipitates with other medications. This laboratory experimental study was performed to determine the drugs that produce precipitates with sugammadex. Samples of 1 ml of sugammadex were prepared in transparent cylinders, to which 1 ml of test drugs (rocuronium, neostigmine, glycopyrrolate, atropine, nitroglycerin, dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, ephedrine, esmolol, nicardipine, and labetalol) was added. The precipitation reaction was observed visually and via light microscope. The pH of each drugs before and after mixing with sugammadex was measured. White crystals were formed when sugammadex was mixed with nicardipine or labetalol. Sugammadex formed precipitate when mixed with nicardipine or labetalol. Sufficient fluid flushing is required between injections of each drug to prevent these reactions.

Oral nifedipine and phytosterol, intravenous nicardipine, and oral nifedipine only: Three-arm, retrospective, cohort study for management of severe preeclampsia.

The treatment of preeclampsia is delivering women and extracting the placenta, but the Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines do not recommend the delivery of babies without severe features. The objectives of the study were to compare the effectiveness and safety of nifedipine and phytosterol in combination with nicardipine for the management of severe preeclampsia. Women (19-32 years; gestation age ≥ 30 weeks) with the complication of severe preeclampsia have received 10 mg of oral nifedipine (pregnant women received 10 mg of oralnifedipine, n = 112) or 1 mg/h intravenous nicardipine (pregnant women received 1 mg/h intravenous nicardipine (ND cohort), n = 115) or oral 10 mg nifedipine and 500 mg phytosterol (pregnant women received oral 10 mg nifedipine and 500 mg phytosterol (np cohort), n = 111) until 150/100 mmHg blood pressure was achieved. The time required to achieve the desired blood pressure control was 13 minutes shorter in the NP cohort compared to the NF (p < 0.0001, t = 11.605), and 3 minutes shorter compared to the ND (p < 0.0001, t = 2.79) cohorts. Stillbirths were reported in 14 (13%), 28 (24%), and 10 (9%) infants, and 13 (12%), 26 (23%), and 10 (9%) infants died from the NF, ND, and NP cohorts, respectively. The undesirable tocolytic effect was reported in 17 (15%) women of the ND cohort. Phytosterol with nifedipine has a synergistic or additive effect on the management of preeclampsia with fewer adverse outcomes.

Effects of drug-drug interactions and CYP3A4 variants on alectinib metabolism.

In this study, the effects of 17 CYP3A4 variants and drug-drug interactions (DDI) with its mechanism on alectinib metabolism were investigated. In vitro incubation systems of rat liver microsomes (RLM), human liver microsomes (HLM) and recombinant human CYP3A4 variants were established. The formers were used to screen potential drugs that inhibited alectinib metabolism and study the underlying mechanism, and the latter was used to determine the dynamic characteristics of CYP3A4 variants. Alectinib and its main metabolite M4 were quantitatively determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The results showed that compared with CYP3A4.1, only CYP3A4.29 showed higher catalytic activity, while the catalytic activity of CYP3A4.4, .7, .8, .12, .14, .16, .17, .18, .19, .20, .23, and .24 decreased significantly. Among them, the catalytic activity of CYP3A4.20 is the lowest, only 2.63% of that of CYP3A4.1. Based on the RLM incubation system in vitro, 81 drugs that may be combined with alectinib were screened, among which 18 drugs had an inhibition rate higher than 80%. In addition, nicardipine had an inhibition rate of 95.09% with a half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 3.54 ± 0.96 µM in RLM and 1.52 ± 0.038 µM in HLM, respectively. There was a mixture of non-competitive and anti-competitive inhibition of alectinib metabolism in both RLM and HLM. In vivo experiments of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, compared with the control group (30 mg/kg alectinib alone), the AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), Tmax and Cmax of alectinib administered in combination with 6 mg/kg nicardipine were significantly increased in the experimental group. In conclusion, the metabolism of alectinib was affected by polymorphisms of the CYP3A4 gene and nicardipine. This study provides reference data for clinical individualized administration of alectinib in the future.