Nasal high frequency oscillatory highflow therapy in preterm infants: A randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and potential physiological mechanisms of highflow therapy with superimposed high frequency oscillations ("osciflow"). STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, single center crossover trial, 30 preterm infants were randomized to receive osciflow or highflow therapy first, each for 180 min. During osciflow, an oscillatory amplitude of 20 mbar and a frequency of 6 Hz were set. The flow rate was 4 L/min during both interventions. Primary outcome was the paired difference in the combined number of desaturations (SpO2 < 80%) and bradycardia (heart rate <80 beats per min) between interventions. Safety outcomes included nasal trauma, pneumothorax and treatment failure, and a pain score was assessed. In 20 infants, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) recordings were performed to evaluate oscillatory (VOsc ) and tidal volumes (VT ) at the lung level. RESULTS: Infants with a mean (SD) postnatal age of 33.1 ± 1.2 weeks were included. The median (IQR) number of episodes of desaturation and bradycardia was 19.5 (6-49) during osciflow and 26 (6-44) during highflow therapy (paired difference -2; IQR -10 to 9; p = .37). There were no differences in safety outcomes and pain scores. During osciflow, EIT recordings showed a signal at 6 Hz, which was not detectable during highflow. Corresponding mean (SD) VOsc /VT ratio was 9% (±5%). CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants, osciflow did not reduce the number of desaturations and bradycardia compared with highflow therapy. Although VOsc were transmitted to the lung during osciflow, their magnitude was small. Osciflow was safe and well tolerated.

Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates after extubation: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a challenging phase of neonatal respiratory support [1]. Choosing efficient and safe noninvasive modality to prevent re-intubation and choosing the optimal time for weaning are key points for weaning success. The aim of the study is to compare the efficiency and safety of noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) versus noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as respiratory support after extubation in preterms with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Also, the study compared the lung ultrasound findings between these 2 modalities and assessed the use of lung ultrasound score (LUS) as predictor for extubation outcome. METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted on 60 preterm neonates with RDS. Patients were allocated into one of 2 groups: NIPPV or NHFOV as post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support. The 2 groups were compared regarding the incidence of extubation failure within 72 hours from extubation, oxygen needs, duration of application of the noninvasive modality, duration of admission, safety and mortality rate. LUS was assessed pre-extubation and 2 hours post-extubation. RESULTS: The study did not show a statistically significant difference in re-ventilation rate in NHFOV group (23.3%) compared to NIPPV group (30.0%), p = 0.56. Oxygen needs were significantly lower in NHFOV group compared to NIPPV groups (mean FiO2 31.8±6.09 vs 38±0.55, p = 0.007). The duration of the used noninvasive modality, CO2 concentration, LUS, and mortality rate showed statistically insignificant difference between both groups. There was a significant correlation between LUS and extubation outcome. CONCLUSION: NHFOV is a feasible noninvasive modality for respiratory support post-extubation in premature infants. LUS is a good predictor of extubation outcome in neonates.

[Efficacy of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a Meta analysis]. / æ— åˆ›é«˜é¢‘æŒ¯è¡é€šæ°”ä¸Žç»é¼»é—´æ­‡æ­£åŽ‹é€šæ°”ä½œä¸ºæ—©äº§å„¿æ‹”ç®¡åŽå‘¼å¸æ”¯æŒç–—æ•ˆæ¯”è¾ƒçš„Meta分析.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants. METHODS: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles on NHFOV and NIPPV as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants published up to August 31, 2022. RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 17.0 software were used for a Meta analysis to compare related indices between the NHFOV and NIPPV groups, including reintubation rate within 72 hours after extubation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) at 6-24 hours after switch to noninvasive assisted ventilation, and the incidence rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), air leak, nasal damage, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). RESULTS: A total of 9 randomized controlled trials were included. The Meta analysis showed that compared with the NIPPV group, the NHFOV group had significantly lower reintubation rate within 72 hours after extubation (RR=0.67, 95%CI: 0.52-0.88, P=0.003) and PCO2 at 6-24 hours after switch to noninvasive assisted ventilation (MD=-4.12, 95%CI: -6.12 to -2.13, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rates of complications such as BPD, air leak, nasal damage, PVL, IVH, and ROP (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NIPPV, NHFOV can effectively remove CO2 and reduce the risk of reintubation, without increasing the incidence of complications such as BPD, air leak, nasal damage, PVL, and IVH, and therefore, it can be used as a sequential respiratory support mode for preterm infants after extubation.

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm infants as an extubation support: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore whether noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) could reduce the incidence of reintubation compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in the postextubation phase of preterm infants. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of NHFOV versus NIPPV were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and MEDLINE. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials including 1138 preterm infants were included in this study. Compared with NIPPV, NHFOV reduced the incidence of reintubation in the post-extubation phase of preterm infants (p = 0.01, RR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56∼0.94), and no heterogeneity was found in the four studies (p = 0.55, I2 = 0%). In the sensitivity analysis, the result showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of reintubation between NHFOV and NIPPV after excluding one study (p = 0. 05, RR = 0.76 95% CI: 0.58∼1.00), and no heterogeneity was found in the other three studies (p = 0.95, I2 = 0%). There was no statistical difference between NHFOV and NIPPV in BPD, air leak, IVH (≥Grade III) and mortality. CONCLUSION: Among mechanically ventilated preterm infants, compared with NIPPV, NHFOV was potentially beneficial to reduce the incidence of reintubation after extubation and did not increase the risk of complications.

Efficacy and safety of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants : a Meta-analysis / 中国新生儿科杂志

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) as the initial ventilation mode for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in premature infants.Methods:From the establishment of the databases [(PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang database, CQVIP and CBM (SinoMed)] to March 1, 2022, literature on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using nHFOV and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) as the initial ventilation modes for RDS in premature infants were searched. The qualities of the included literature were evaluated according to Cochrane Evaluation Manual. RevMan 5.4 software was used for Meta-analysis.Results:Seven RCTs involving 786 children were included for the final Meta-analysis, with 395 cases in the nHFOV group and 391 cases in the NCPAP group. The results showed that the nHFOV group had lower intubation rates than the NCPAP group ( OR=0.34, 95% CI 0.22~0.51, P<0.001). No significant differences existed in mortality rates and complication rates between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:nHFOV as the initial treatment for RDS in premature infants may reduce the incidence of early treatment failure without increasing complications.

Efficacy of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a Meta analysis / 中国当代儿科杂志

OBJECTIVES@#To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants.@*METHODS@#China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles on NHFOV and NIPPV as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants published up to August 31, 2022. RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 17.0 software were used for a Meta analysis to compare related indices between the NHFOV and NIPPV groups, including reintubation rate within 72 hours after extubation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) at 6-24 hours after switch to noninvasive assisted ventilation, and the incidence rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), air leak, nasal damage, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).@*RESULTS@#A total of 9 randomized controlled trials were included. The Meta analysis showed that compared with the NIPPV group, the NHFOV group had significantly lower reintubation rate within 72 hours after extubation (RR=0.67, 95%CI: 0.52-0.88, P=0.003) and PCO2 at 6-24 hours after switch to noninvasive assisted ventilation (MD=-4.12, 95%CI: -6.12 to -2.13, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rates of complications such as BPD, air leak, nasal damage, PVL, IVH, and ROP (P>0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Compared with NIPPV, NHFOV can effectively remove CO2 and reduce the risk of reintubation, without increasing the incidence of complications such as BPD, air leak, nasal damage, PVL, and IVH, and therefore, it can be used as a sequential respiratory support mode for preterm infants after extubation.

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus bi-level positive pressure ventilation in premature infants with respiratory failure: A retrospective study.

Objectives: Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) is a novel respiratory support mode for premature infants. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effect of nHFOV and bi-level nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in premature infants with neonatal respiratory failure (NRF) as initial noninvasive ventilation (NIV) support mode. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of preterm infants admitted to the tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. Preterm infants with the gestational age of 25-34 weeks, diagnosed with NRF, used nHFOV or BiPAP as the initial respiratory support mode were analyzed. The rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within the first seven days after birth and adverse outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Two hundred fifty-five preterm infants were analyzed (128 in nHFOV group,127 in BiPAP group). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the BiPAP group, the nHFOV group had significantly lower need for IMV within the first seven days after birth (18/128 vs. 33/127, p = 0.01) and PCO2 at 12 and 24 hours post-treatment (46.34±5.24mmHg vs. 51.18±4.83mmHg, P<0.01; 40.72±4.02mmHg vs. 42.50±3.86mmHg, P<0.01). The incidence of BPD, ROP, air leak syndromes, IVH≥ grade 3, PVL, NEC≥II stage, abdominal distension, and nasal trauma were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: nHFOV significantly reduced the need for IMV and improved the elimination of CO2 compared with BiPAP in preterm infants with NRF without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.

Use of NHFOV vs. NIPPV for the respiratory support of preterm newborns after extubation: A meta-analysis.

Objectives: This meta-analysis evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for preterm newborns after extubation. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases from inception to August 28, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of NHFOV and NIPPV in newborns were included in the review and meta-analysis, which followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Results: Eight studies involving 1,603 patients were included. Compared with NIPPV, NHFOV could reduce the reintubation rates (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53, 0.86, P = 0.002). Subgroup analysis showed that the significant difference was found in reintubation rates within 72 h (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.32, 0.73, P = 0.0005). NHFOV also could decrease the duration of non-invasive ventilation (standard mean difference (SMD) = -1.52, 95% CI -2.58, -0.45, P = 0.005). However, all included studies had a high risk of bias, and the overall quality of the evidence of the outcomes was low or very low. Conclusion: In our study, compared with NIPPV, NHFOV seems to reduce the reintubation rates without increasing adverse outcomes. Nevertheless, definite recommendations cannot be made based on the quality of the published evidence.

Non-invasive high flow oscillatory ventilation in comparison with nasal continuous positive pressure ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome, a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) keeps the lung open with add-on effective rhythmic oscillations in addition to allowing spontaneous breathing. This review aims at reconstructing the different pieces of available research articles and evidence into a more solid collective evidence for NHFOV in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). METHODS: A thorough systemic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on preterm infants with RDS comparing NHFOV with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in terms of PCO2 change, need for ventilation, duration of respiratory support, mortality air leak, or BPD were included. Data quality assessment and meta-analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Five RCTs involving 270 preterm infants included in the review. PCO2 relatively decreased on NHFOV (MD = 3.84, confidence interval (CI) 7.32-0.35, p = .03). On the other hand, relative risk (RR) of intubation was unquestionably decreased with NHFOV in comparison with NCPAP (RR = 0.43, CI 0.25-0.75, p = .003) without statistical heterogeneity I2 = 0%. Although the risk of mortality was less in NHFOV, the difference was statistically insignificant (RR = 0.72, CI 0.24-2.18, p = .56). Other outcomes reported in single studies only. Duration of respiratory support was significantly shorter in NHFOV compared with NCPAP (37.35 ± 8.96 versus 49.77 ± 10.33, p = .009), whereas air leak and BPD were reported in very few cases without a significant difference between the two interventions. CONCLUSIONS: NHFOV improved the PCO2 elimination and decreased the risk of intubation without a significant change in mortality compared with NCPAP.

Transmission of Oscillatory Volumes into the Preterm Lung during Noninvasive High-Frequency Ventilation.

Rationale: There is increasing evidence for a clinical benefit of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) in preterm infants. However, it is still unknown whether the generated oscillations are effectively transmitted to the alveoli.Objectives: To assess magnitude and regional distribution of oscillatory volumes (VOsc) at the lung level.Methods: In 30 prone preterm infants enrolled in a randomized crossover trial comparing nHFOV with nasal continuous positive airway pressure, electrical impedance tomography recordings were performed. During nHFOV, the smallest amplitude to achieve visible chest wall vibration was used, and the frequency was set at 8 hertz.Measurements and Main Results: Thirty consecutive breaths during artifact-free tidal ventilation were extracted for each of the 228 electrical impedance tomography recordings. After application of corresponding frequency filters, Vt and VOsc were calculated. There was a signal at 8 and 16 Hz during nHFOV, which was not detectable during nasal continuous positive airway pressure, corresponding to the set oscillatory frequency and its second harmonic. During nHFOV, the mean (SD) VOsc/Vt ratio was 0.20 (0.13). Oscillations were more likely to be transmitted to the non-gravity-dependent (mean difference [95% confidence interval], 0.041 [0.025-0.058]; P < 0.001) and right-sided lung (mean difference [95% confidence interval], 0.040 [0.019-0.061]; P < 0.001) when compared with spontaneous Vt.Conclusions: In preterm infants, VOsc during nHFOV are transmitted to the lung. Compared with the regional distribution of tidal breaths, oscillations preferentially reach the right and non-gravity-dependent lung. These data increase our understanding of the physiological processes underpinning nHFOV and may lead to further refinement of this novel technique.

Three non-invasive ventilation strategies for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The present study was designed and conducted to compare the efficacy between nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) as the primary noninvasive ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed using data from four tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China between 2016 and 2018. 512 preterm infants with RDS who received early non-invasive ventilation (NIV) were analyzed. Propensity score analysis with 1 : 1 matching was performed with the nearest neighbor matching method using calipers of width equal to 0.1 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score. The primary outcome was the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within the first 7 days after birth. Secondary outcomes were days of hospitalization, predischarge mortality, rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) > stage II, rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks post-menstrual age, rate of air leaks, rate of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) ≥ grade 3, and rate of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) ≥ stage II. RESULTS: Propensity score matching identified 126 infants in each cohort (NHFOV vs. NIPPV), 96 infants in each cohort (NHFOV vs. NCPAP), 134 infants in each cohort (NIPPV vs. NCPAP) respectively. The need for IMV was significantly lower in the NHFOV as compared with NCPAP and NIPPV groups respectively (13/126 vs. 27/126, p = 0.016; 9/96 vs. 20/96, p = 0.027), while no difference was observed between NIPPV and NCPAP groups (25/134 vs. 25/134, p = 0.805). However, the number of days of hospitalization in NIPPV was significantly lower than that of the NCPAP group (24.8 ±14.6 days vs. 33.2 ±20.2 days p = 0.002). In subgroup analyses, the need for IMV was significantly lower in the NHFOV group than in the NCPAP and NIPPV group (7 : 79 vs. 15 : 74; 95% CI: 1.00-6.836; p = 0.044 and 11 : 102 vs. 22 : 98; 95% CI: 1.092-5.251; p = 0.026), and there was no difference between NIPPV and NCPAP in the preterm infants at ≤ 32 weeks' gestational age. There were no significant differences among three groups (p > 0.05 respectively) regarding secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, NHFOV significantly reduced the need for IMV within the first 7 days as compared to NCPAP and NIPPV in the treatment of preterm infants with RDS without increasing the incidence of adverse events. However, NIPPV was not found to be superior to NCPAP for decreasing the need for IMV in the treatment of preterm infants with RDS.

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is one of the main causes of mortality in premature neonates. Treatment of these neonates with invasive mechanical ventilation has side effects such as chronic pulmonary diseases. Noninvasive ventilation, such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal high-frequency oscillation ventilation (NHFOV), has shown to reduce the burden of chronic lung disease. NHFOV is a promising new mode of noninvasive ventilation and may reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and reduce possible complications. In this study, we hypothesized that early NHFOV would reduce the need for invasive respiratory support in comparison to NCPAP in preterm neonates with RDS.Methods: One hundred twenty-four neonates between 28 to 34 weeks of gestational age (GA) with RDS hospitalized at Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz in 2016 were included in this randomized controlled study. The primary outcomes were the failure of NHFOV and NCPAP within 72 h after birth. The secondary outcomes were the duration of invasive ventilation and possible side effects.Results: Out of 124 neonates in this study, 63 and 61 neonates were studied in the NHFOV and NCPAP groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between NHFOV (6.5%) and NCPAP (14.1%) groups in terms of rates of primary consequences (p = .13). However, the duration of noninvasive ventilation in NHFOV was significantly less than that of NCPAP group (p = .01).Conclusion: In our study group, preterm infants from 28 to 34 weeks of GA, NHFOV did not reduce the need for mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h after birth compared to NCPAP; however, the duration of noninvasive ventilation in the NHFOV group was significantly shorter.

Carbon dioxide diffusion coefficient in noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: The carbon dioxide (CO2 ) diffusion coefficient (DCO 2 ) reflects CO 2 removal during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). We hypothesized that despite leak flow during noninvasive HFOV (nHFOV) DCO 2 continues to indicate ventilation efficacy. METHODS: A neonatal airway model including CO2 production and an adjustable oropharyngeal leak was connected to a ventilator via bi-nasal prongs. Pressures and gas flows were measured at prongs, trachea, and leak. Oscillatory tidal volumes below (V T trachea ) and above the leak (V T prong ) were calculated from tracheal and leak flows. DCO 2 was calculated using V T trachea (DCO 2 trachea ) and V T prong (DCO 2 prong ) and compared with CO 2 partial pressure (pCO 2 ). Effects of leak flow (0, 5, or 10 L/min) on DCO 2 were assessed at fixed pressure amplitudes or predefined oscillatory volumes under steady-state pCO 2 conditions in the modeled lung. RESULTS: DCO2 trachea correlated strongly with pCO 2 , independent of the leak flow level (P < 0.0001). DCO 2 prong correlated with pCO 2 without and with moderate leak (P < 0.0001) but not with maximum leak (P = 0.1432). V T trachea correlated with the quotient of tracheal pressure amplitude and frequency irrespective of the leak (P < 0.0001). Based on the pressure amplitude at prong level (A prong ) V T trachea continued to follow a linear model of which the slopes decreased with increasing leak flow. V T prong correlated with the quotient of A prong and frequency, irrespective of the leak (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: DCO2 obtained at the airway opening at prong level reflects ventilation efficacy during nHFOV even in the presence of moderate oropharyngeal leak.

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV), a relatively new modality, is gaining popularity despite scarce evidence. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nHFOV as respiratory support in premature infants. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception of the database to January 2019. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of nHFOV therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or biphasic nCPAP (BP-CPAP) in newborns for respiratory support were included. All meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 8 RCTs involving 463 patients were included. The meta-analysis estimated a lower risk of intubation (relative risk = 0.50, 95% confidence interval of 0.36 to 0.70) and more effective clearance of carbon dioxide (weighted mean difference = - 4.61, 95% confidence interval of - 7.94 to - 1.28) in the nHFOV group than in the nCPAP/BP-CPAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that nHFOV, as respiratory support in preterm infants, significantly remove carbon dioxide and reduce the risk of intubation compared with nCPAP/BP-CPAP. The appropriate parameter settings for different types of noninvasive high-frequency ventilators, the effect of nHFOV in extremely preterm infants, and the long-term safety of nHFOV need to be assessed in large trials.

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome: A preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) after surfactant administration via INSURE (intubation, surfactant, extubation) method on the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS: A total of 81 infants with a gestational age (GA) of 28-34 weeks were eligible and were randomized to nCPAP (n = 42) or to nHFOV (n = 39). The need for IMV was the primary outcome. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and air leaks, and mortality were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULT: A total 76 infants finally completed the study. The need for IMV was significantlylower in the nHFOV group compared with the nCPAP group(24.3% vs 56.4%, P < 0.01). The incidence of IVH, air leaks or BPD was similar between the two groups. In addition, the mortality rate was not statistically different. CONCLUSION: In this prospective, randomized controlled study, nHFOV significantly reduced the need for IMV as compared with nCPAP in preterm infants with moderate-severe RDS without increase in adverse effects.

Application of noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates with meconium aspiration syn-drome with pulmonary hypertension after extubation / 实用医学杂志

Objective To investigate the clinical value of nasal noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ven-tilation(NHFOV)as a respiratory support after exbutation by comparing it with nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP)in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome(MAS)and persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN).Methods Infants of MAS with PPHN after exbutation from intensive care unit were randomly divided in-to NHFOV and NCPAP groups. The value of blood oxygen Pressure(PaO2),carbon dioxide partial pressure(Pa-CO2)and PaO2/FiO2at 1 h,12 h,24 h after exbutation were monitored.Results The NHFOV group showed low-er PaCO2than the NCPAP group at 1 h,12 h and 24 h after noninvasive respiratory support[1 h:(41.1 ± 7.2)vs. (45.4 ± 6.7),P=0.000;12 h:(38.9 ± 3.1)vs.(44.6 ± 5.2),P=0.000;24 h:(35.1 ± 8.2)vs.(43.2 ± 7.1),P=0.000].There were no statistically significant difference of both PaO2and PaO2/FiO2at 1 h,12 h,24 h between the two groups(P>0.05).11.43% infants were failed to be extubated in NHFOV group,but 35.29% in NCPAP group, and there was significant difference between the two groups(P=0.021). Conclusion Compared with NCPAP, NHFOV can better reduce carbon dioxide retention in the sequential therapy for neonates after extubation,and it can also decrease the rate of extubation failure.

Oscillation transmission and volume delivery during face mask-delivered HFOV in infants: Bench and in vivo study.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) has not been studied beyond neonatal age and with interfaces other than nasal prongs. We set up a preliminary study to investigate feasibility, oscillation transmission, and volume delivery of face mask-delivered NHFOV in a bench model mimicking a normal 1-year infant without any lung disease and then in vivo in a series of infants with same characteristics. DESIGN: A mannequin with upper airways was connected to an electronic active lung simulator ventilated through NHFOV with varying parameters. Volume delivered by oscillations (oTv), oscillatory pressure ratio, and estimation of ventilation (DCO2) were measured at the lung simulator. Four infants were ventilated with face mask-delivered NHFOV for 2 hr and monitored with respiratory inductance plethismography. Vital parameters, oscillatory pressure ratio, oscillatory (RIPo), and spontaneous cage/abdomen displacement (RIPs) were recorded. RESULTS: There was a dampening of oscillation amplitude both on the bench model and in vivo: oscillatory pressure ratios at the mask were 80% and 17%, respectively. Significant correlations exist between oscillatory pressure ratio (only when this latter was <0.038) and oTv (r = 0.48; P < 0.001) or DCO2 (r = 0.47; P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, oscillatory pressure ratio was a main determinant of oTv and DCO2. Oscillations were slightly visible on the chest in vivo and RIPo was about 5% of RIPs. NHFOV did not change vital parameters and did not cause discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Face mask-delivered NHFOV is feasible in a model of 1-year infant. No major complications occurred in vivo. Oscillations are superimposed to the spontaneous breathing and are significantly dampened. Pediatr Pulmonol. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:705-712. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.