Analyzing the changing trend of corneal biomechanical properties under different influencing factors in T2DM patients.

To analyze the changing trend of CH and CRF values under different influencing factors in T2DM patients. A total of 650 patients with T2DM were included. We discovered that the course of T2DM, smoking history, BMI, and FBG, DR, HbA1c, TC, TG, and LDL-C levels were common risk factors for T2DM, while HDL-C levels were a protective factor. Analyzing the CH and CRF values according to the course of diabetes, we discovered that as T2DM continued to persist, the values of CH and CRF gradually decreased. Moreover, with the increase in FBG levels and the accumulation of HbA1c, the values of CH and CRF gradually decreased. In addition, in patients with HbA1c (%) > 12, the values of CH and CRF decreased the most, falling by 1.85 ± 0.33 mmHg and 1.28 ± 0.69 mmHg, respectively. Compared with the non-DR group, the CH and CRF values gradually decreased in the mild-NPDR, moderate-NPDR, severe-NPDR and PDR groups, with the lowest CH and CRF values in the PDR group. In patients with T2DM, early measurement of corneal biomechanical properties to evaluate the change trend of CH and CRF values in different situations will help to identify and prevent diabetic keratopathy in a timely manner.

[Structural and functional features of the eye in Marfan syndrome. Report 1. Changes in the fibrous tunic of the eye]. / Strukturno-funktsional'nye osobennosti glaza pri sindrome Marfana. Soobshchenie 1. Izmeneniya fibroznoi obolochki.

Marfan syndrome (MS) is an orphan hereditary connective tissue disease associated with a mutation in the FBN1 gene, which pathological manifestations are characterized by polysystemic involvement. The fibrillin-1 protein is an integral component of the sclera and cornea of the eye, and in MS its structure is distrubed. PURPOSE: This study assesses potential structural and functional changes in the cornea and sclera of a patient with MS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two groups were formed, comparable in the axial length of the eye and age: the main group - 19 patients (38 eyes) with a verified diagnosis of MS, and the control group - 24 patients (48 eyes) with myopia of varying degrees. The results obtained from MS patients were analyzed depending on the absence or presence of ectopia lentis. In addition to measuring the basic ophthalmological parameters (refraction, axial length, visual acuity), topographic keratometry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and ocular response analyzer were used for structural and functional assessment of the cornea and sclera. RESULTS: In MS there was a statistically significant increase in the radius of curvature and a decrease in corneal refraction in the central zone compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in central corneal thickness, but there was a significant decrease in the thickness of the sclera in the limbal zone compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant changes in corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in MS. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the previously obtained data on the tendency of the optical power to reliably decrease in MS (flattening of the cornea). This symptom can be considered as a compensatory factor affecting clinical refraction, while the decrease in the thickness of the sclera - as the main reason for aaxial length elongation in MS. There were no clear patterns of dependence of the changes in the cornea and sclera analyzed in this study on the presence or absence of ectopia lentis. Changes in the lens, perhaps, should be regarded only as one of the potential components of the ocular symptom complex in MS.

Mendelian Randomisation Analysis of Causal Association between Lifestyle, Health Factors, and Keratoconus.

Keratoconus (KC), a leading cause of vision impairment, has an unclear aetiology. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore the causal links between various factors (smoking, asthma, Down syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, atopic dermatitis, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels) and KC. A two-sample MR design, grounded in genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, was adopted using data from FinnGen, UK Biobank, and other GWAS-related articles. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was employed, complemented by the Wald ratio method for factors with only one single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Sensitivity and stability were assessed through Cochrane's Q test, the MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO outlier test, and the leave-one-out analysis. The IVW results for the ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer) biomechanical parameters indicated significant associations between tobacco smoking (CH: p < 0.001; CRF: p = 0.009) and inflammatory bowel disease (CH: p = 0.032; CRF: p = 0.001) and corneal biomechanics. The Wald ratio method showed tobacco smoking was associated with a lower risk of KC (p = 0.024). Conversely, asthma (p = 0.009), atopic dermatitis (p = 0.012), inflammatory bowel disease (p = 0.017), and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (p = 0.039) were associated with a higher risk of KC by IVW, and the same applied to Down syndrome (p = 0.004) using the Wald ratio. These results underscore the role of corneal biomechanics as potential mediators in KC risk, warranting further investigation using Corvis ST and Brillouin microscopy. The findings emphasise the importance of timely screening for specific populations in KC prevention and management.

Corneal Hysteresis as a Marker for Patients with Secondary Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the association of corneal hysteresis (CH) in patients with secondary glaucoma to control patients and patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Additionally, to determine the consistency of CH measurements in patients with secondary glaucoma. METHODS: A total of 84 patients (121 eyes) were prospectively included in this study. Twenty-three patients (46 eyes) were healthy controls, 24 patients (40 eyes) were diagnosed with POAG, and 27 patients (35 eyes) were diagnosed with a form of secondary glaucoma. CH and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Three measurements per eye were performed and used for the analysis and to determine fluctuations in CH data. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis and Chi-Squared testing was done to determine differences between groups. RESULTS: All patients were matched for age. Patients in both POAG and secondary glaucoma groups were matched for age and IOP. All groups had similar sex and racial compositions as well as similar proportions of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. CH was lower (p < .05) in patients with POAG (9.32 ± 1.64) and secondary glaucoma (7.89 ± 3.18) when compared to healthy controls (11.16 ± 1.60). Fluctuations in CH measurements were minimal in all groups. Further analysis of the secondary glaucoma group revealed no differences in CH between different types of secondary glaucoma (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with secondary glaucoma have lower CH when compared to POAG or control groups. The ORA exhibits precision of CH measurements for control, POAG, and secondary glaucoma groups, making it a reliable tool in management of secondary forms of glaucoma.

In vivo assessment of the ocular biomechanical properties in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

PURPOSE: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is associated with an increased prevalence of open-angle glaucoma, attributed to variations of the pressure gradient between intraocular and intracranial compartments at the level of the lamina cribrosa (LC). As ocular biomechanics influence the behavior of the LC, and a lower corneal hysteresis (CH) has been associated to a higher risk of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, in this study we compared ocular biomechanics of iNPH patients with healthy subjects. METHODS:  Twenty-four eyes of 24 non-shunted iNPH patients were prospectively recruited. Ocular biomechanical properties were investigated using the ocular response analyzer (Reichert Instruments) for the calculation of the CH, corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Results were compared with those of 25 eyes of 25 healthy subjects. RESULTS:  In iNPH eyes, the median CH value and interquartile range (IQR) were 9.7 mmHg (7.8-10) and 10.6 mmHg (9.3-11.3) in healthy controls (p = 0.015). No significant differences were found in IOPcc [18.1 mmHg (14.72-19.92) vs. 16.4 mmHg (13.05-19.6)], IOPg [15.4 mmHg (12.82-19.7) vs. 15.3 mmHg (12.55-17.35)], and CRF [9.65 mmHg (8.07-11.65) vs. 10.3 mmHg (9.3-11.5)] between iNPH patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS:  In iNPH patients, the CH was significantly lower compared to healthy subjects. This result suggests that ocular biomechanical properties may potentially contribute to the risk of development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage in iNPH patients.

Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach.

Over the last two decades, there has been growing interest in assessing corneal biomechanics in different diseases, such as keratoconus, glaucoma, and corneal disorders. Given the interaction and structural continuity between the cornea and sclera, evaluating corneal biomechanics may give us further insights into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, progression, and management of glaucoma. Therefore, some authorities have recommended baseline evaluations of corneal biomechanics in all glaucoma and glaucoma suspects patients. Currently, two devices (Ocular Response Analyzer and Corneal Visualization Schiempflug Technology) are commercially available for evaluating corneal biomechanics; however, each device reports different parameters, and there is a weak to moderate agreement between the reported parameters. Studies are further limited by the inclusion of glaucoma subjects taking topical prostaglandin analogues, which may alter corneal biomechanics and contribute to contradicting results, lack of proper stratification of patients, and misinterpretation of the results based on factors that are confounded by intraocular pressure changes. This review aims to summarize the recent evidence on corneal biomechanics in glaucoma patients and insights for future studies to address the current limitations of the literature studying corneal biomechanics.

Estudio comparativo entre tonómetros Goldmann y ORA en pacientes recién diagnosticados de GPAA o HTO, sin tratamiento / Comparison of Goldmann and ORA tonometers in newly diagnosed, untreated, POAG and OHT eyes

Antecedentes y objetivo Las propiedades biomecánicas corneales en ojos de pacientes recién diagnosticados de glaucoma e hipertensión oculares (HTO) y que no han recibido tratamiento previo son de gran interés, porque pueden suponer una fuente de error en la medida de la presión intraocular (PIO) medida mediante tonometría de aplanación Goldmann (TAG) y Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA). El principal objetivo de este estudio es evaluar los valores de la PIO obtenidos con la TAG y el ORA, en pacientes con glaucoma primario de ángulo abierto (GPAA) e HTO que no han recibido tratamiento antiglaucomatoso previo. Materiales y métodos Estudio transversal, observacional con observador enmascarado. Se incluyeron pacientes recién diagnosticados de GPAA e HTO, que no habían recibido tratamiento tópico hipotensor previo. Resultados Se incluyeron 51 pacientes con GPAA y 34 pacientes con HTO. Se encontró un valor de la PIO corneo compensada (PIOcc) significativamente mayor que el de la PIO TAG en el grupo de GPAA (p=0,0002), mientras que no se encontraron diferencias significativas entre ambos tonómetros en el grupo de HTO (p=0,1). Conclusiones La TAG parece infraestimar la PIO «real» en pacientes con GPAA sin tratamiento hipotensor previo, mientras que parece ser más exacta en pacientes con HTO (AU)

Background and objective The corneal biomechanical properties in naïve, untreated glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT) eyes is interesting, because it may be a source of error in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and ocular response analyzer (ORA). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the IOP values obtained using GAT and the ORA, in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and in OHT untreated eyes. Material and methods Observational, masked, cross sectional observational study. Newly diagnosed, untreated POAG and OHT eyes were included. Results Fifty-one POAG and 34 OHT eyes were analyzed. We found that IOPcc (IOP corneal-compensated) was significantly higher than GAT IOP in POAG (P=.0002) while we did not find any significant difference between both tonometers in OHT (P=.1). Conclusions GAT seems to underestimate the real IOP in untreated POAG eyes and it seems to be quite accurate in OHT eyes (AU)

Comparison of Goldmann and ORA tonometers in newly diagnosed, untreated, POAG and OHT eyes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The corneal biomechanical properties in naïve, untreated glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT) eyes is interesting, because it may be a source of error in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) The main objective of this study was to evaluate the IOP values obtained using GAT and the ORA, in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and in OHT untreated eyes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, masked, cross sectional observational study. Newly diagnosed, untreated POAG and OHT eyes were included. RESULTS: 51 POAG and 34 OHT eyes were analyzed. We found that IOPcc (IOP corneal-compensated) was significantly higher than GAT IOP in POAG (p = 0.0002) while we did not find any significant difference between both tonometers in OHT (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: GAT seems to underestimate the real IOP in untreated POAG eyes and it seems to be quite accurate in OHT eyes.

In vivo corneal elastography: A topical review of challenges and opportunities.

Clinical measurement of corneal biomechanics can aid in the early diagnosis, progression tracking, and treatment evaluation of ocular diseases. Over the past two decades, interdisciplinary collaborations between investigators in optical engineering, analytical biomechanical modeling, and clinical research has expanded our knowledge of corneal biomechanics. These advances have led to innovations in testing methods (ex vivo, and recently, in vivo) across multiple spatial and strain scales. However, in vivo measurement of corneal biomechanics remains a long-standing challenge and is currently an active area of research. Here, we review the existing and emerging approaches for in vivo corneal biomechanics evaluation, which include corneal applanation methods, such as ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST), Brillouin microscopy, and elastography methods, and the emerging field of optical coherence elastography (OCE). We describe the fundamental concepts, analytical methods, and current clinical status for each of these methods. Finally, we discuss open questions for the current state of in vivo biomechanics assessment techniques and requirements for wider use that will further broaden our understanding of corneal biomechanics for the detection and management of ocular diseases, and improve the safety and efficacy of future clinical practice.

Dependence of corneal hysteresis on non-central corneal thickness in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dependence of corneal hysteresis (CH) on non-central corneal thickness. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 1561 eyes of 1561 healthy volunteers with IOP less than 21mmHg, open angles on gonioscopy and no prior eye surgeries or local or systemic diseases. Pentacam-Scheimpflug technology was employed to segment the cornea into 6 circular zones centered on the apex (zones 1-6) and to determine the mean corneal thickness of these areas. CH was measured with ORA. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models adjusted for age and sex were created to model the dependence of CH on corneal thickness in zones 1 to 6. RESULTS: In the univariate linear regression models, we found that CH was dependent on mean corneal thickness of zone 1 (B=0,004; R2=0.95%; P<0.001), zone 2 (B=0,004; R2=0.57%; P=0.002), zone 4 (B=0,005; R2=1.50%; P<0.001) and zone 6 (B=0,003; R2=0.92%; P<0.001). Similar results were obtained in the multivariate model (R2=3.46%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a significant dependence of CH on non-central corneal thickness. The model of corneal thickness segmentation into circular zones centered on the corneal apex is able to explain 3.47% of the variation in CH measurements.

Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.

INTRODUCTION: Corneal biomechanical properties could affect intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in corneal biomechanical properties of various types of glaucoma, assess their effect on IOP measurements. METHODS: This is an observational clinical study of 486 subjects including 102 normal subjects, 104 ocular hypertension (OHT), 89 normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and 191 high tension glaucoma (HTG). Corneal biomechanical parameters were measured using an ocular response analyzer. The main parameters assessed were corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated pressure measurement (IOPg), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Ultrasound pachymetry was used to measure central corneal thickness (CCT). IOP was measured by a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and a noncontact tonometer (NCT). Visual field (VF) and refractive status were also recorded. Results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Multiple comparison by analysis of variance showed significantly lower CH and CRF in NTG compared to HTG, OHT, and normal subjects (CH: 0.011, 0.015, and 0.033; CRF: 0.001, <0.001, and 0.042, respectively). CRF and CH associated with IOP were measured using either GAT, NCT and IOPcc-GAT, IOPcc-NCT, yet CCT was not. GAT correlated strongly with IOPg (r = 0.79; p < 0.001) and IOPcc (r = 0.77; p < 0.001), but limits of agreement between the measurements were poor. CH and CRF were both negatively correlated with VF change (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CH and CRF affect the measurement of IOP and were related to types of glaucoma or severity of glaucoma. Pure CCT should not be used to correct IOP values or estimate the risk of disease.

Corneal Hysteresis for the Diagnosis of Glaucoma and Assessment of Progression Risk: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the current published literature on the utility of corneal hysteresis (CH) to assist the clinician in the diagnosis of glaucoma or in the assessment of risk for disease progression in existing glaucoma patients. METHODS: Searches of the peer-reviewed literature in the PubMed database were performed through July 2022. The abstracts of 423 identified articles were examined to exclude reviews and non-English articles. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 articles were selected, and the panel methodologist rated them for level of evidence. Eight articles were rated level I, and 5 articles were rated level II. The 6 articles rated level III were excluded. RESULTS: Corneal hysteresis is lower in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, primary angle-closure glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, and pseudoexfoliation syndrome compared with normal subjects. Interpretation of low CH in patients with high intraocular pressure (IOP) or on topical hypotensive medications is complicated by the influence of these parameters on CH measurements. However, CH is also lower in treatment-naïve, normal-tension glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects who have a similar IOP. In addition, lower CH is associated with an increased risk of progression of glaucoma based on visual fields or structural markers in open-angle glaucoma patients, including those with apparently well-controlled IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal hysteresis is lower in glaucoma patients compared with normal subjects, and lower CH is associated with an increased risk of disease progression. However, a causal relationship remains to be demonstrated. Nevertheless, measurement of CH complements current structural and functional assessments in determining disease risk in glaucoma suspects and patients. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Evaluation of the corneal biomechanical properties and corneal thickness in patients with Graves' orbitopathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties and central corneal thickness in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO). METHOD: A total of 132 eyes of 66 patients with GO and 108 eyes of 54 healthy subjects were enrolled. Eyes with GO were classified as high score clinical activity score (CAS, ≥ 3) (Group 1, n = 64) and low CAS score (< 3) (Group 2, n = 68). Corneal biomechanical parameters [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF)], Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) levels were measured with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) and compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean CH values were found as 9.6 ± 1 mmHg in Group 1, 10.2 ± 0.9 mmHg in Group 2, and 11.4 ± 1.7 mmHg in the Control Group (p < 0.001). In post hoc analysis the mean CH was significantly lower in Group 1 than Group 2 and Control Group (Group 1-Group 2, p < 0.001; Group 1-Control Group, p < 0.001). The mean CRF was found as 10.5 ± 2.1 in Group 1, 10.4 ± 2.2 in Group 2, and 10.43 ± 2.0 in the Control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in CRF measurements (p = 0.959). The mean IOPcc values were found as 17.1 ± 3.6 mmHg in Group 1, 15.8 ± 4.0 mmHg in Group 2 and 15.2 ± 4.1 mmHg in the Control Group. The IOPcc and IOPg measurements between all groups were statistically significant (p = 0.009, p = 0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biomechanical measurements were different in the GO patients with varying CAS scores compared to healthy individuals.

A Review of Corneal Biomechanics and Scleral Stiffness in Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy for Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The mechanism of action underlying prostaglandin analog (PGA) therapy involves changes in the expression of different metalloproteases to increase permeability of the sclera and allow increased aqueous humor outflow through this alternative drainage pathway. This alteration of structure impacts cornea/scleral biomechanics and may introduce artifact into the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the clinical setting. METHODS: A literature search reviewing the impact of PGA therapy on corneal and scleral biomechanics was conducted including basic studies, clinical studies with treatment naïve patients, and a clinical study examining the cessation of PGA therapy. Additional literature including engineering texts was added for greater clarity of the concepts underlying ocular biomechanics. RESULTS: One study with an animal model reported significant corneal stiffening with PGA treatment. Most longitudinal clinical studies examining the effects of initiation of PGA therapy in PGA naïve subjects failed to report biomechanical parameters associated with stiffness using the Corvis ST and only included those parameters strongly influenced by IOP. One study reported a significant reduction in scleral stiffness with IOP as a co-variate, highlighting the need to account for the effects of IOP lowering when assessing clinical biomechanics. The report of cessation of PGA therapy on corneal biomechanics showed no change in corneal compensated IOP after 6 weeks, raising the question of reversibility of the PGA-induced structural alteration. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the findings in several clinical studies may merely reflect a reduction in IOP, further studies are warranted using Corvis ST parameters associated with corneal and scleral stiffness. The gold standard for IOP measurement in the clinical setting is Goldmann applanation tonometry, a technique previously shown to be affected by corneal stiffness. Since PGA therapy has been reported to alter not only scleral biomechanics, but also corneal biomechanics, it is essential to consider alternative tonometry technologies in the clinic.

Predictive models for IOPs measured with NCT, GAT, and ORA among patients undergoing SMILE.

Purpose: To develop predictive models for the intraocular pressure (IOP) of patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures, measured with a noncontact tonometer (NCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and an ocular response analyzer (ORA). Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 104 eyes (-6.23 ± 2.06 diopters) of 52 patients (24.38 ± 4.76 years) undergoing SMILE procedures were included. The intraocular pressure was measured (IOPNCT with NCT, IOPGAT with GAT, and IOPcc and IOPg with ORA) before surgery and at postoperative 6 months. Information on age, preoperative and attempted spherical equivalent (SE), ablation depth, preoperative values and postoperative changes in central corneal thickness (CCT), K1, K2, Km, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) values was collected in order to predict IOPs. Results: All surgeries were uneventful. At postoperative 6 months, the efficacy and safety index were 1.04 ± 0.15 and 1.08 ± 0.18, respectively. Significant decreases were detected in postoperative IOPNCT, IOPGAT, IOPcc, and IOPg compared to preoperative values (all p < 0.001). No relationship was found between any IOP and ablation depth, attempted SE, and preoperative SE, as well as CCTdifference (all p > 0.05). Predictive models for IOPs were constructed to predict preoperative values, and R 2 values were 67.5% (IOPNCT), 64.5% (IOPGAT), 78.7% (IOPcc), and 82.0% (IOPg). The prediction band of IOPNCT and IOPGAT was 7.4-15.1 mmHg and 8-16 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: Predictive models for IOP measurements after SMILE procedures can be helpful in clinical practice.

The Effect of Thyroid Eye Disease on Corneal Biomechanical Properties.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify corneal biomechanical parameters measured by ORA in patients with TED compared to the healthy group. The NOSPECS classification of patients is used to assess the relation between biomechanical changes and disease severity. Methods: We included 22 TED patients, diagnosed with TED for more than five years, and 43 healthy participants. The NOSPECS classification was assessed as mild (grade 1-3) and severe (grade 4-6) disease. For each group, corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), central corneal thickness (CCT), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) parameters were measured by ORA. Results: The mean age was 38.8±11.6 years for the TED patients and 42.9±15.58 years for the control group. For TED patients and healthy volunteers, the mean levels of CRF, CH, and CCT were measured as follows: 10.43±2.04 vs 10.28±1.91mmHg, p=0.67; 10.18±1.81 vs 10.21±1.68 mmHg, p=0.90; 550.31±35.73 vs 545.23±37.91 µm, p=0.47, respectively. These values were not significant between groups, but they were significantly higher in females compared to males in TED patients [CRF;10.68 (IQR: 9.49-12.14) vs 8.96 (IQR: 8.04-9.92) mmHg, p=0.002, CH; 10.43 (IQR: 9.48-11.25) vs 8.58 (IQR: 7.90-9.95) mmHg, p=0.003 and CCT; 554.25 (IQR: 536.05-579.52) vs 527.40 (IQR: 492.25-545.90) µm, p=0.014]. CRF values were negatively correlated with NOSPECS score (r=-0.317, p=0.036) and significantly higher CRF was observed in mild patients compared to severe disease (11.43 (IQR: 10.14-12.87) vs 9.46 (IQR: 8.75-10.28) mmHg, p=0.008). Conclusion: We found a significant gender effect on corneal biomechanical parameters of TED patients. CRF, CH and CCT values were significantly higher in females compared to males with TED. The clinical severity score of TED showed negative correlation with CRF. CRF value might be a useful parameter in follow-up of TED patients in clinical practice.

Corneal epithelial remodeling after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis combined with intraoperative accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking for myopia: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed regional corneal thickness remodeling, biomechanical properties, and visual outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis combined with intraoperative accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (LASIK Xtra) for myopia. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 21 consecutive patients (18 women, three men; 42 eyes) who were treated with LASIK Xtra. All treatments were performed with ultraviolet-A (energy, 2.7 J/cm2; irradiance, 30 mW/cm2), using continuous (90 s) illumination. Postoperative values of corneal biometrics and visual outcomes were compared with preoperative values. Corneal thickness changes were evaluated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. All patients were followed up for 12-month postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared statistically using the paired t-test for normally distributed parameters and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Friedman analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for non-normally distributed data. RESULTS: Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) significantly improved at 6-month after surgery (P < 0.001). The central and inner regional corneal epithelial thickness significantly increased after LASIK Xtra (P < 0.05 for all), while the peripheral corneal epithelial thickness remained stable at 12-month after surgery. There was also a statistically significant decreased in the stromal thickness at most locations (P < 0.05 for all), except in the outer superior and outer superior-temporal regions. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK Xtra provided improvement in UDVA, corneal curvature, and corneal biomechanical stability. Because the results of this retrospective study results depended on the cohort members' past information, it was inferred and confirmed that regular corneal thickness remodeling occurred after treatment.

Determine Corneal Biomechanical Parameters by Finite Element Simulation and Parametric Analysis Based on ORA Measurements.

Purpose: The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) is one of the most commonly used devices to measure corneal biomechanics in vivo. Until now, the relationship between the output parameters and corneal typical biomechanical parameters was not clear. Hence, we defined the output parameters of ORA as ORA output parameters. This study aims to propose a method to determine corneal biomechanical parameters based on ORA measurements by finite element simulation and parametric analysis. Methods: Finite element analysis was used to simulate the mechanics process of ORA measurements with different intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal geometrical parameters and corneal biomechanical parameters. A simplified geometrical optics model was built to simulate the optical process of the measurements to extract ORA output parameters. After that, 70% of the simulated data was used to establish the quantitative relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and ORA output parameters by parametric analysis and 30% of the simulated data was used to validate the established model. Besides, ten normal subjects were included to evaluate the normal range of corneal biomechanical parameters calculated from ORA. Results: The quantitative relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and ORA output parameters is established by combining parametric analysis with finite element simulation. The elastic modulus (E) and relaxation limit (G ∞) of the ten normal subjects were 0.65 ± 0.07 MPa and 0.26 ± 0.15, respectively. Conclusions: A method was proposed to determine corneal biomechanical parameters based on the results of ORA measurements. The magnitude of the corneal biomechanical parameters calculated according to our method was reasonable.

Modification of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy.

Changes in the cornea can influence outcomes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients undergoing non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with the Esnoper V2000 implant® (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Gasteiz, Spain). We included 42 eyes of 42 patients with POAG scheduled for NPDS with the Esnoper V2000 implant. Biomechanical properties were measured by Ocular Response Analyzer® G3 (ORA; Reichert Inc., Depew, NY, USA). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) were measured the day before surgery and on day 1, 7, and 30 and 2 and 3 months after surgery. CH initially increased, fell below the presurgical value at 30 days after the surgery, and increased again at 2 and 3 months. CRF, IOPcc, and IOPg decreased on the first day after surgery, then followed a trend of increasing but stayed below pre-surgery levels. All values reached statistical significance. While observed changes in corneal biomechanics after NPDS and Esnoper V2000 implant were significant, more studies are needed if we are to understand their influence on corneal biomechanics and their clinical relevance in POAG.

Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible visual outcome for patients dealing with this feared complication. Although Goldmann applanation tonometry is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure, its limitations in postkeratoplasty eyes, due to postoperative modified corneal morphology, have led to the search for more suitable alternatives. This review is the result of a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE database that aims to present glaucoma in the context of perforating keratoplasty, the corneal properties with impact on ocular pressure measurement, and the results achieved with the most important tonometers that have been studied in this pathology. Goldmann applanation tonometry remains the reference for intraocular pressure assessment even in corneas after penetrating keratoplasty. However, some promising alternatives have emerged, the most important of which are the Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, the ocular response analyzer, and the iCare. All have advantages and disadvantages but have proved to be appropriate alternatives, especially in cases in which Goldmann applanation tonometry cannot be used.