Primary omental infarction - a benign cause of acute abdomen.

Objectives: Omental infarction (OI) is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain. A high index of clinical suspicion is required for diagnosis of OI as the incidence is less than 1 %, presenting with abdominal pain. We report primary OI's clinical and radiological profile from a single tertiary care hospital in India. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the electronic medical and radiology records of patients with abdominal pain were reviewed over seven years (2015-2022). Variables were systematically collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 22 patients diagnosed with primary OI were included in this study. Male preponderance (63.6 %) was noted with a mean age of 47.45 years (SD ± 13.84; range: 18-72 years). Most patients belonged to class I obesity (according to the Asia-Pacific body mass index classification) with a mean BMI of 26.56 kg/m2 (SD ± 3.21 kg/m2). All patients had abdominal pain as the primary symptom, with a mean duration of 8.64 days (SD ± 10.15; range: 1-42 days). The most common locations of pain were the right hypochondrium (27.3 %) and diffuse (27.3 %), followed by the right iliac fossa (18.1 %). Most (95.45 %, n=21/22) patients were treated conservatively, and only one required surgical intervention. Conclusions: Primary OI is a rare and benign cause of acute abdomen. Obesity is a risk factor but does not correlate with the size or severity of OI. Radiological imaging, like a computed tomography (CT) scan, is essential for diagnosis. A conservative management line should be the first approach in treating primary OI before considering surgical options.

Uncommon Etiologies of Acute Abdominal Pain: A Case Report on Omental Infarction.

Omental infarction is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain. The condition is often misdiagnosed due to its clinical similarity to more common abdominal pathologies like appendicitis and cholecystitis. This report presents the case of a 57-year-old female with a one-week history of left-sided abdominal pain, initially aggravated by eating and defecation. The patient, a long-term smoker with a complex medical history that includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, was hemodynamically stable on presentation. A CT scan revealed a nodular infiltration consistent with an omental infarct. Conservative management was pursued, resulting in symptom resolution by the third day of hospitalization. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges associated with omental infarction, particularly its differentiation from other causes of acute abdominal pain. It highlights the importance of considering rare etiologies in patients with atypical presentations and emphasizes the role of imaging, particularly CT scans, in accurate diagnosis. The patient's successful conservative management aligns with current recommendations, which advocate for non-surgical treatment in most cases. This approach avoids unnecessary surgical interventions and ensures a favorable prognosis with low complication rates in patients with prompt and appropriate management.

Primary Peritoneal Mesothelioma Affecting the Greater Omentum That Mimicked an Omental Infarction: A Case Report.

Introduction: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer that is associated with asbestos exposure. The diagnosis can be difficult given the nonspecific nature of presenting symptoms and the presence of concomitant confounding findings. Case Presentation: We report a 71-year-old male who presented with right lower quadrant pain and new-onset ascites. CT imaging of the abdomen/pelvis demonstrated omental stranding concerning for a possible omental infarction. Subsequent imaging showed persistent omental edema but no identifiable soft tissue mass. A biopsy of the omentum showed atypical mesothelial proliferation, but pathology was unable to determine if proliferation was a neoplastic versus reactive process. Surgical oncology performed a diagnostic laparoscopy that showed peritoneal studding of the omentum. Subsequent immunohistochemical staining of the omentum demonstrated preservation of BAP1 expression and loss of MTAP expression, consistent with peritoneal mesothelioma. Conclusion: MPM is a rare and aggressive cancer with an overall poor prognosis. The diagnosis of MPM can be difficult based on the nonspecific clinical presentation, insufficient imaging and laboratory testing, and the presence of concomitant confounding findings, such as with this patient and his admitting diagnosis of omental infarction. This case demonstrates the importance of developing a broad differential while maintaining an awareness of heuristics that can influence clinical decision-making.

Spontaneous omental infarction in an obese young female patient treated with laparoscopy: a case report.

Partial infarction of the great omentum is a rare cause of abdominal pain and may present as a surgical emergency. Omental infarction might occur due to its torsion, but cases without obvious cause are reported. Risk factors related to this condition are overweight, obesity, abdominal trauma, recent abdominal surgery, hypercoagulability, postprandial vascular congestion and an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. Because of the condition's rarity, most patients are treated with surgery and the diagnosis is established intraoperatively. Preoperative diagnosis allows successful conservative treatment with analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs. This case reports a young female patient with class III obesity presented with spontaneous partial infarction of the great omentum treated with laparoscopy.

M-mode ultrasound for assessment of the "tethered fat sign" in children: an easily performed way to certify a dynamic process as a still picture.

Background: Omental infarction is a rare pediatric disease. Ultrasound is a useful modality for a non-invasive pre-operative differential diagnosis between inflammatory conditions (as appendicitis) and omental infarction, especially by detecting immobility of the omentum adhered to the abdominal wall ("tetherd fat sign"). However, this is a dynamic sign that cannot be documented in a static image with B-mode technique. The goal of this work is to incorporate the versatile function of motion mode (M-mode) into omental infarction diagnosis to describe how the M-mode is useful in the evaluation of fat motion in children suspected of having omental infarction. In 2019 we suggested a new Ultrasound sign named "tethered fat sign" for an accurate non-invasive diagnosis of omental infarction in children. This finding was observed in 6 of the 234 seen children of our previous study with 4 laparoscopic confirmed diagnosis. Methods: From January 2019 to July 2021, we evaluated 195 children (91 boys and 104 girls, from 3 to 15 years) admitted to our Santobono-Pausilipon Children Hospital with acute right-sided abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound was performed to all the patients and the investigation of "tethered fat sign" was always included. Results: In 7 patients ultrasound showed the presence of a hyperechoic oval mass localized in the right upper abdominal quadrant and in 2 of these M-mode documented a normal subhepatic fat moving during respiratory movements in relation with the abdominal wall. The remaining 5 patients had an omental infarction showed as a subhepatic motionless mass tethered to the abdominal wall on M-mode. In these patients, a sonographic follow-up was performed every 15 d for 2 months showing a progressive reduction in size of the right-sided hyperechoic mass. Conclusions: In the evaluation of all children who showed the presence of the "tethered fat sign" the use of M-mode provide a certified image in diagnostic ultrasound.

Omental infarction following robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Omental infarction (OI) is a rare condition with an overall incidence of less than 0.3%. It can occur spontaneously or can be secondary to trauma, surgery, and inflammation. While previously a diagnosis of exclusion, due to development in imaging technology, OI can now be identified based on CT findings. OI symptoms can mimic an acute abdomen, prompting potentially unnecessary surgical exploration. Treatment options range from conservative management to interventional radiology or surgical resection of the infarcted omentum. We are presenting the first case of OI following robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair. This case highlights the importance of considering OI in differential diagnoses for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain, the utility of imaging workup in identifying OI, and guidance for conservative treatment approaches to reduce unnecessary surgical intervention.

Efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization of omental artery aneurysm: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Omental artery aneurysm (OAA) is an extremely rare visceral artery aneurysm. Ruptured OAAs are associated with a high mortality rate. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has been used to treat OAA in recent years. However, the risk of omental ischemia due to TAE remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAE of OAA as a first-line treatment. METHODS: Fifteen patients with true aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms who underwent OAA-TAE between 1 April 2010 and 31 December 2022 were included in this study. The technical and clinical outcomes, the incidence of omental infarction after TAE as a major complication, OAA-TAE techniques, radiological findings on computed tomography angiography and angiogram, and patient characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (nine men, six women; age, 69.8 ± 18.59 years) underwent TAE of OAAs (mean aneurysm size of 9.30 ± 6.10 mm) located in the right gastroepiploic (n = 9), left gastroepiploic (n = 1), and epiploic (n = 5) arteries. All patients with ruptured (n = 6) and unruptured (n = 9) OAA successfully underwent TAEs using coils, n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, or gelatin sponges. Hepatic artery thrombosis and coil migration were observed during the procedure; however, these adverse events were manageable. Transfusion of red blood cell units (4.66 ± 1.63 units) was required only in cases with ruptured OAAs after TAE. Additional surgery or TAE due to rupture or rerupture of OAA and omental infarction was not required during the postoperative and follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: The OAA-TAE can effectively treat ruptured and unruptured OAAs, and the risk of omental infarction after OAA-TAE may not be high.

Omental Abscess after Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Drainage.

We report the case details of a 65-year-old Japanese man with an omental abscess that was discovered 43 days after he underwent a laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. His chief complaint was mild abdominal pain that had persisted for several days. The abscess was diagnosed as a rare postoperative complication. We hesitated to perform a reoperation given the invasiveness of general anesthesia and surgery, plus the possibility of postoperative adhesions and because the patient's general condition was stable and he had only mild abdominal pain. Percutaneous drainage using a 10.2-F catheter was performed with the patient under conscious sedation and computed tomography-fluoroscopy guidance, with no complications. After the procedure, the size of the abscess cavity was remarkably reduced, and 23 days later the catheter was withdrawn.

Omental Infarction Mimicking Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report.

Acute abdominal pain is a common presentation in emergency departments, often attributed to a myriad of potential causes. Among these, acute appendicitis remains a frequently diagnosed culprit. However, this case report presents a 32-year-old male who arrived at the emergency department with severe right lower quadrant abdominal pain, characterized by localized tenderness and guarding. The initial clinical diagnosis pointed to acute appendicitis. Before surgical intervention, a computed tomography scan was conducted and revealed a focal area of fat stranding, consistent with omental infarction, while the appendix appeared normal. The patient's management involved pain control and supportive care, leading to a complete resolution of abdominal pain at a two-week follow-up. This case emphasizes the significance of including omental infarction in the spectrum of diagnoses for acute abdominal pain, underlining the potential to prevent unnecessary surgical interventions.

Omental torsion - A mimicker of the acute appendicitis - A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Omental torsion is due to the twisting of the omentum along its axis and is observed in young male patients. The first description of omental torsion was first made by Eitel in 1899. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old male presented with right iliac fossa pain, nausea, occasional vomiting and loss of appetite for four days. His clinical and radiological findings were suggestive of acute appendicitis. However, he was diagnosed with greater omental torsion intraoperatively and successfully managed with laparoscopic omentectomy. DISCUSSION: Omental torsion is a rare condition with a low incidence. Preoperative diagnosis of omental torsion continues to be a challenge as the symptoms reported in the literature are usually confused with other abdominal pathologies such as appendicitis or cholecystitis etc. Preoperative US or CT scans are mandatory, and these procedures can accurately accomplish the pre-operative diagnosis. In search for the treatment of choice, laparoscopy proved its effectiveness as a diagnostic tool since it allows for confirming the diagnosis, evaluating the severity of the ischemia, and ruling out other surgical pathologies and therapeutic tools. At the same time, the open surgery approach can be described in many cases as being too invasive. CONCLUSION: Greater omental torsion should be considered a differential diagnosis in all patients with acute abdominal emergencies.

Peri-gastric appendagitis with lesser omentum hemorrhagic infarction: US, CT, and MRI findings of a rare entity.

Peri-gastric appendagitis followed associated with gastro-hepatic ligament/lesser omentum hemorrhagic infarction has not been well investigated yet. With an accurate radiological diagnosis of peri-gastric appendagitis, even in case of hemorrhagic infarction, the patient can receive supportive measures for the self-limited pain and can forgo surgery, endoscopy, and further invasive testing.

Case Report: A Child With Omental Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Omental infarction (OI) is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, which is benign and self-limited. It is diagnosed by imaging. The etiology of OI is either idiopathic or secondary and due to torsion, trauma, hypercoagulability, vasculitis, or pancreatitis. CASE REPORT: Here, we present a case of OI in a child with acute severe right upper quadrant pain. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Correct diagnosis of OI via imaging can prevent unnecessary surgery.

Omental infarction diagnosed by computed tomography, missed with ultrasonography: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Omental infarction (OI) is a surgical abdominal disease that is not common in adults and is very rare in children. Similar to various acute abdominal pain diseases including appendicitis, diagnosis was previously achieved by diagnostic laparotomy but more recently, ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) examination has been used. CASE SUMMARY: A 6-year-old healthy boy with no specific medical history visited the emergency room with right lower abdominal pain. He underwent abdominal ultrasonography by a radiologist to rule out acute appendicitis. He was discharged with no significant sonographic finding and symptom relief. However, the symptoms persisted for 2 more days and an outpatient visit was made. An outpatient abdominal CT was used to make a diagnosis of OI. After laparoscopic operation, his symptoms resolved. CONCLUSION: In children's acute abdominal pain, imaging studies should be performed for appendicitis and OI.

Idiopathic Omental Infarction Presenting With Recurrent Abdominal Pain.

Omental infarction is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, and its rarity is mainly due to its relatively rich blood supply by multiple collateral vessels. It usually presents with right lower quadrant pain, as left-sided torsion is infrequent and is usually diagnosed intraoperatively. Since omental infarction is frequently diagnosed by CT scan, conservative management should be considered in most patients to avoid subjecting the patients to unnecessary surgical intervention. We present a rare case of idiopathic omental infarction in which the patient was initially radiologically diagnosed with Meckel's diverticulitis but was later found to have omental infarction on diagnostic laparoscopy.

Omental infarction found incidentally during metastatic workup: A report of 2 cases.

Omental infarction is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain that can occur in different several locations. We report 2 cases of omental infarction diagnosed at computed tomography (CT) scan performed as part of routine oncological surveillance, one right-sided and the other left sided. This paper illustrates the range of CT scan findings and highlights the important clinical implications of this radiological diagnosis.

Spontaneous omental infarction: A rare case of acute abdomen.

Omental infarction is a rare but a sinister cause of acute abdomen. Preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to its rare nature. It poses nonspecific abdominal signs that can be easily mistaken with other more common intra-abdominal pathologies. We report a case of a 37-year-old male patient presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain with an elevation of inflammatory markers. His cross-sectional imaging did not a reveal specific diagnosis; therefore, a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed which revealed a non-inflamed appendix and an inflammatory mass formed by the ischemic omentum attached to the ascending colon. Diagnostic laparoscopy and subsequent laparotomy revealed spontaneous omental infarction. The histology of the resected specimen was in keeping with the omental necrosis. This case reflects the importance of considering omental infarction in patients presenting with abdominal pain and raised inflammatory markers. He made an uneventful recovery following surgery.

A Rare Complication of Perforated Appendicitis: A Case of Necrotizing Fasciitis.

Acute appendicitis is considered one of the most common surgical emergencies with low morbidity and mortality. However, delay in the diagnosis may lead to perforation of the appendix. Hence, complications may arise, including necrotizing fasciitis, a rare complication of a perforated appendix. We present a case of perforated appendicitis complicated by necrotizing fasciitis leading to rapid deterioration. A 75-year-old male patient presented to our emergency room with a three-day history of right lower quadrant abdominal pain and abdominal distention. On admission, computed tomography (CT) scan showed a perforated appendix and peri-appendicular abscess. An exploratory laparotomy was performed. The appendix was resected and the wound closed. The patient was recovering well and tolerating food after the procedure. However, the patient developed progressive erythema/swelling over the right flank with new-onset leukocytosis. The diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis was suspected and confirmed by careful evaluation and laboratory/radiological tests. Antibiotics were changed to clindamycin and piperacillin/tazobactam, and the patient was taken back to the operation room (OR) for surgical debridement. Postoperatively, the patient was shifted to the intensive care unit (ICU). He developed hearing impairment, which improved after the cessation of clindamycin. He was discharged in good condition after three weeks of hospital stay. This case report highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for necrotizing soft tissue infection in immunocompromised patients with perforated appendicitis and being cautious when prescribing clindamycin to patients at risk of hearing loss.

Imaging of Mischievous Intra-abdominal Fat Presenting with Abdominal Pain: A Pictorial Review.

Aim: To briefly discuss the imaging features of different types of intra-abdominal fat necrosis. Background: Trauma and ischemic insult may result in intra-abdominal fat necrosis. Fat necrosis may present with acute abdomen, clinically simulating with other etiologies, such as acute diverticulitis and acute appendicitis. Main body: Imaging plays a crucial role in making the exact diagnosis and differentiating it from other pathologies that may require surgical intervention. Computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly used imaging modality. A small fat attenuation lesion with a hyperattenuating rim in contact with the ventral surface of the sigmoid colon indicates epiploic appendagitis while a larger fat-attenuation lesion on the right side of the abdomen in between the colon and anterior abdominal wall indicates omental infarction. Fat stranding at the root of the mesentery with fat ring sign represents inflammatory mesenteric panniculitis while retractile or sclerosing mesenteritis appears as a fibrotic spiculated mass with or without calcification, mimicking mesenteric carcinoid. In patients with acute pancreatitis, the amount of inflamed fat correlates with clinical severity and outcome. Conclusions: Familiarity with the imaging features of different types of intraabdominal fat necrosis helps in establishing an accurate diagnosis, thus avoiding unnecessary intervention. How to cite this article: Patel RK, Mittal S, Singh S. Imaging of Mischievous Intra-abdominal Fat Presenting with Abdominal Pain: A Pictorial Review. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2022;12(1):45-49.

Omental infarction in mild Covid-19 infection.

COVID-19 is an infection which can present with various clinical manifestations. While it affects respiratory tract primarily, several other manifestations including gastrointestinal involvements have been reported. The prevalence of all gastrointestinal complaints is approximately 17 percent and diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and abdominal pain are the most common symptoms. In COVID-19, acute abdominal pain requiring surgical evaluation and abdominal imaging is uncommon and there is also a lack of knowledge about COVID-19 related gastrointestinal complications. Here, we report a case of mild COVID-19 infection complicated by omental infarction during the course of the illness.

Acute Omental Infarction Mimicking Acute Appendicitis.

Acute abdominal pain is a common cause of visits to the emergency department. Acute appendicitis remains the most common indication for abdominal surgical intervention in the pediatric age group. However, several conditions may present with a clinical picture similar to that of acute appendicitis. We report the case of a 7-year-old girl with a history of right lower quadrant abdominal pain of two days in duration. The pain was associated with vomiting and was exacerbated by movement. Abdominal examination revealed a localized tenderness in the right iliac fossa with guarding, giving the impression of acute appendicitis. After a thorough investigation, the patient was diagnosed as having acute omental infarction given the radiological findings seen in the computed tomography scan. The patient was successfully managed conservatively with analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs. Physicians should keep a high index of suspicion for this condition when encountering a patient presenting with an acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Imaging modalities play a pivotal role in making the diagnosis.