Effects of different surgical strategies and left ventricular remodelling on the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

Background: Ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) caused by coronary artery disease accounts for the largest proportion of heart failure cases with the worst prognosis. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most effective treatment for ischaemic HFrEF. On-pump and off-pump are the two surgical methods used for CABG. Whether patients with HFrEF should undergo on- or off-pump CABG is controversial in coronary heart disease surgery. The left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVSEVI) is the gold standard for evaluating the severity of left ventricular remodelling; however, its effect on the perioperative risk and long-term survival rate of patients with HFrEF undergoing CABG remains unclear. Methods: This single centre prospective cohort analysis included 118 coronary heart disease patients with symptoms and signs of heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40% who were enrolled consecutively from January 2019 to December 2023. Operative mortality, perioperative complications, and long-term survival were compared among patients treated with various LVESVIs and surgical methods. The primary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and revascularization, (percutaneous coronary intervention or redo CABG) with a median follow-up of 38 ± 10 months. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality of 118 patients was 6.8%. Patients in the off-pump group had significantly higher perioperative mortality than those in the on-pump group (12.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.03). In the off-pump group, a higher proportion of patients required perioperative mechanical assistance, such as intra-aortic artery balloon pump (IABP) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), compared to those in the on-pump group (IABP: 75% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.004; ECMO: 22.5% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.000). Patients in the off-pump group were more likely to have postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) (35% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.01). In the on-pump group, the incidence of postoperative AF (25% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.02) and IABP use (62.5% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients with more severe left ventricular remodelling than in those with less severe left ventricular remodelling. In the off-pump group, patients with more severe left ventricular remodelling had higher ECMO usage (38.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.04), incidence of postoperative AF (61.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.02), and perioperative mortality (22.2%). Major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival rate was significantly higher in the on-pump group than in the off-pump group, and there was no significant difference in MACE free survival rates between the two groups of patients with different degrees of left ventricular remodelling. Conclusion: On-pump bypass is a better surgical procedure for patients with ischaemic HFrEF, especially those with severe left ventricular remodelling. Left ventricular remodelling increases perioperative mortality but has no effect on long-term survival.

Comparison of adverse events after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with COPD / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the difference of adverse events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).Methods:The clinical data of COPD patients undergoing CABG surgery admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether they received cardiopulmonary bypass or not, they were divided into ONCABG group (64 cases) and OPCABG group (154 cases). The preoperative and postoperative clinical data were analyzed. The whole group was divided into 4 subgroups (ON1、ON2、OP1、OP2) according to whether receiving cardiopulmonary bypass or not and FEV160% as the cut-off point, to investigate the difference of postoperative adverse events.Results:A total of 218 patients were included, ranging in age from 45 to 76 years old, with a mean age of (63.81±7.72) years, including 149 males (68.35%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse events between the ONCABG and OPCABG groups ( P>0.05). In subgroup analysis, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection (72.73% vs. 45.65%, P<0.05) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (59.09% vs. 32.61%, P<0.05) was higher in ON1 (FEV1≤60% ONCABG, 22 cases) group than in OP1 (FEV1≤60% OPCABG, 46 cases) group. Conclusion:The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection and atrial fibrillation in COPD patients with FEV1≤60% was higher in ONCABG than in OPCABG.

Graft flow evaluation with intraoperative transit-time flow measurement in off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Objective: We aimed to compare transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) parameters for on-pump (ONCAB) and off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass procedures. Methods: The database of the Registry for Quality AssESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery (REQUEST) study was retrospectively reviewed. Only single grafts were included (ie, no sequential or Y/T grafts). Primary end points were mean graft flow (MGF), pulsatility index (PI), diastolic fraction (DF), and backflow (BF). Unadjusted and propensity score-matching comparisons were performed. Results: Of 1016 patients in the REQUEST registry, 846 had at least 1 graft for which TTFM was performed. Of these, 512 patients (60.6%) underwent ONCAB and 334 (39.4%) OPCAB procedures. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) during measurements was higher in the OPCAB group. After propensity score-matching, 312 well balanced pairs were left. In these matched patients, MGF was higher for the ONCAB versus the OPCAB group (32 vs 28 mL/min, respectively, for all grafts [P < .001]; 30 vs 27 mL/min for arterial grafts [P = .002]; and 35 vs 31 mL/min for venous grafts [P = .006], respectively). PI was lower in the ONCAB group (2.1 vs 2.3, for all grafts; P < .001). Diastolic fraction was slightly lower in the ONCAB group (65% vs 67.5%; P < .001). The backflow was also lower in the ONCAB group (0.6 vs 1.3; P < .001) with trends similar to MGF and PI for venous and arterial grafts. There were 21 (3.3%) revisions in the OPCAB group and 14 (2.1%) in the ONCAB group (P = .198). Conclusions: ONCAB surgery was associated with higher MGF and lower PI values, especially in venous grafts. Different TTFM cutoff values for ONCAB versus OPCAB surgery might be considered.

Comparison of Changes in Thoracic Fluid Content Between On-Pump and Off-Pump CABG by Use of Electrical Cardiometry.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the changes in thoracic fluid content, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, plateau pressure, compliance, and postoperative ventilation duration in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary-care cardiac center. PARTICIPANTS: Over an 18-month period, from December 2019 to May 2021, 111 patients who underwent CAB grafting were enrolled. Group I constituted OPCAB patients and Group II the ONCAB patients. INTERVENTIONS: After induction, the authors measured thoracic fluid content (TFC), pulmonary compliance, airway pressures, and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio before skin incision (T1) and after skin closure (T2). The input, output, as well as the duration of postoperative ventilation, also were recorded. RESULTS: At T2, the ONCAB group had a significantly higher change in TFC than the OPCAB group (5.4 ± 1.86 kOhm-1v 4.32 ± 1.84 kOhm-1, p = 0.012). The fluid balance was significantly higher in the OPCAB group compared with the ONCAB group (2,159.21 ± 108.73 mL v 1,792.50 ± 151.88 mL, p = 0.0001). The decrease in PaO2/FIO2 ratio was significantly lower in the OPCAB group compared with the ONCAB group (-71.34 ± 23.42 v -123.65 ± 36.81, p = 0.000). The increase in plateau pressure, decrease in compliance, and postoperative ventilation period were significantly higher in the patients who underwent ONCAB than the patients who underwent OPCAB (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The change in TFC was greater in the ONCAB group, despite the fact that the fluid balance was higher in the OPCAB group. A higher TFC in ONCAB led to lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio, lower compliance, higher plateau pressures, and longer postoperative ventilation.

Experience with porcine beating heart simulator for coronary artery bypass surgery residency training.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of our uniquely designed beating heart simulator for coronary artery bypass surgery residency training. METHODS: The balloon of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was inserted into the left ventricle of an isolated porcine heart to form a beating heart simulator. This model simulated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG), and the nonbeating heart model simulated the on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG) for training of surgeons. From 2017 to 2019, 60 trainees were randomly divided into nonbeating and beating heart simulator training groups. The training period was 3 months. The performance of anastomosis was evaluated at the beginning (after 1 month), midpoint (after 2 months), and at the end of the assessment (after 3 months). RESULTS: Trainees improved their performance of coronary artery anastomosis respectively after 3 months of training, whether they were trained on beating heart simulator or nonbeating heart simulator (P < .05). On both nonbeating and beating heart simulator test, trainees in the beating group performed better than those in the nonbeating group in the use of microsurgical instruments, anastomotic quality, and anastomotic speed after 3 months of training (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of our uniquely developed beating heart simulator training was better than those of nonbeating heart simulator for OPCABG and ONCABG training of surgeons during residency.

Effect of Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volumes on the Incidence of Intraoperative Conversion During Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Intraoperative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass with its subsequent high mortality is a major concern associated with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). The impact of procedure volume on the incidence of intraoperative conversion, however, is poorly defined. This study therefore evaluated the effect of procedure volume on the incidence of conversion in OPCAB using nationwide data. We analyzed 31,361 patients who underwent primary, nonemergent, isolated OPCAB during 2013-2016 reported in the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database. Hospitals (n = 548) and surgeons (n = 1315) were divided into tertile categories (low-, medium-, and high volumes) based on the total number of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Hierarchical logistic regression analysis, including 22 preoperative factors and hospital and surgeon CABG volumes, was used to assess the relation between procedure volume and the risk of conversion due to bleeding/hemodynamic instability. There were 797 (2.5%) intraoperative conversions due to bleeding/hemodynamic instability. Risk-adjusted odds ratios for conversion were significantly lower in some combined hospital/surgeon CABG volume categories than in the reference category. Hospital/surgeon volumes and their odds ratio (95% confidence interval) were as follows: low/low 1.00 (reference); medium/low 0.62 (0.39-0.96); high/low 0.47 (0.27-0.81); high/high 0.58 (0.38-0.89). There was a lower risk of conversion in medium- and high-volume than low-volume hospitals, especially among low-volume surgeons. Procedure volume is associated with the incidence of conversion during OPCAB. Among low-volume surgeons, hospital CABG volume significantly reduces conversion in a volume-dependent manner. These findings will be useful for safety training of OPCAB surgeons.

On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of multivessel diseases via left anterolateral minithoracotomy / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Objective    To analyze the safety and follow-up results of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of multivessel diseases via left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Methods    From January 2018 to March 2020, a total of 30 patients including 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 61.3±7.5 years having multivessel coronary heart diseases were treated in our hospital with on-pump CABG via left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Among them, 14 patients had three-vessel diseases and 16 patients had two-vessel diseases. Results    There were 29 internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending bypass grafts harvested in total while the rest were saphenous-vein bypass grafts. The average number of bypass vessels was 2.3±0.5. There was no perioperative death in the whole group, one patient underwent rethoracotomy due to hemorrhage, and one patient suffered acute renal insufficiency. The average time of postoperative tracheal intubation was 16.0±5.8 hours, and the postoperative ICU stay was 30.1±11.5 hours. Twenty five patients were followed up, including coronary CT angiography examinations at 6 months and 1 year after operation. Proximal anastomotic stenosis in one patient and distal anastomosis occlusion in one patient occurred. Conclusion    On-pump CABG via left anterolateral minithoracotomy is safe for appropriately selected patients.

Effect on myocardial injury between off-pump and modified perfusion on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A retrospective cohort study in 558 patients / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Objective    To explore the difference of myocardial injury between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) and modified perfusion on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB). Methods    A total of 558 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from 2017 to 2019 were included. According to whether or not they received modified perfusion cardiopulmonary bypass, all the 558 patients were divided into two groups including an OPCAB group (OP group) and an ONCAB group (ON group). There were 465 patients in the OP group including 282 males and 183 females with an average age of 63.58±7.87 years. In the ON group, there were 93 patients including 64 males and 29 females with an average age of 63.91±7.51 years. Creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) and cardiac specific troponin I (cTnI) were measured 24 hours before operation, 30 minutes after operation, 12 hours after operation, 36 hours after operation and 48 hours after operation. Results    No perioperative death occurred in all patients. CK-MB (5.00 ng/mL vs. 8.60 ng/mL, Z=–2.189, P=0.029) and cTnI (3.00 ng/mL vs. 7.80 ng/mL, Z=–5.307, P=0.000) in postoperative 12 hours in the ON group were less than those in the OP group. CK-MB (5.00 ng/mL vs. 5.60 ng/mL, Z=–2.280, P=0.023) and cTnI (0.10 ng/mL vs. 1.02 ng/mL, Z=–6.418, P=0.000) in postoperative 36 hours in the ON group were less than those in the OP group. cTnI (0.07 ng/mL vs. 0.81 ng/mL, Z=–1.946, P=0.032) in postoperative 48 hours in the ON group was less than that in the OP group. Conclusion    Compared with OPCAB, modified perfusion ONCAB has less myocardial damage. 

Meta-analysis of the benefit of beta-blockers for the reduction of isolated atrial fibrillation incidence after cardiac surgery.

Objectives: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common problem of cardiac surgery. Beta-blockers are recognized as effective prophylactic agents available for POAF management. To better understand its effect on isolated atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery, a meta-analysis was conducted. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched and filtered by comparing the efficacy of beta-blockers and control users in isolated POAF for cardiac surgery. Seventeen RCTs were identified and analyzed by typical meta-analysis methods. The search was performed from inception to May 31, 2020. Subgroup analyses were conducted for type of surgery and beta-blocker, starting time and route of administration of beta-blocker, and dosage of intravenous landiolol hydrochloride. Results: Beta-blockers were effective in reducing isolated POAF risk (risk ratio [RR], 0.52 [0.41, 0.66], P = .31, I2 = 12%). In subgroup analyses, beta-blocker administration during postoperative period (RR, 0.43 [0.29, 0.62], P = .84, I2 = 0%) and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (RR, 0.34 [0.04, 3.15], P = .56, I2 = 0%) had lowest risk of isolated POAF incidence. Intravenous landiolol hydrochloride at 2 µg/kg/min also had low risk of isolated POAF occurrence. Conclusions: Beta-blocker treatment helps to reduce isolated atrial fibrillation incidence after cardiac surgery. Our subgroup analyses also reveal postoperative beta-blocker administration after on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery is most effective in reducing isolated POAF risk. Intravenous landiolol hydrochloride at a dosage of 2 µg/kg/min has also displayed favorable results. Further trials may be required to explore these factors.

On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients needing at least two grafts: comparative outcomes at 20 years.

OBJECTIVES: Despite evidence from several randomized controlled trials and observational studies validating short-term safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), concerns persist regarding the impact of off-pump CABG on long-term survival and freedom from reintervention. This persistent scepticism regarding off-pump CABG prompted us to review our practice of CABG over the last 20 years with a view to comparing the impact of off-pump and on-pump CABG on short-term and long-term outcomes in a high-volume off-pump coronary surgery centre. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data from the Patients Analysis and Tracking System database (Dendrite Clinical Systems, Oxford, UK) for all isolated first-time CABG procedures with at least 2 grafts performed at our institution from January 1996 to September 2017. Over the study period, 5995 off-pump CABG and 4875 on-pump CABG were performed by surgeons with exclusive off-pump and on-pump practices, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression and the Cox model were used to investigate the effect of off-pump versus on-pump procedures on short-term outcomes and long-term survival. Propensity score matching was used to compare the 2 matched groups. RESULTS: Off-pump CABG was associated with a lower risk for 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.55; P < 0.001], reintubation/tracheostomy (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72; P < 0.001) and re-exploration for bleeding (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.37-0.62; P < 0.001). The benefit in terms of operative deaths from off-pump was significant in those with Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery logistic EuroSCORE >2 (interaction P = 0.04). When compared with on-pump CABG, off-pump CABG did not significantly reduce the risk of stroke (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.12; P = 0.20) and postoperative haemofiltration (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.20; P = 0.35). At the median follow-up of 12 years (interquartile range 6-17, max 21), off-pump CABG did not affect late survival [log rank P = 0.24; hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.02] or the need for reintervention (log rank P = 0.12; HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95-1.48). CONCLUSIONS: This large volume, single-centre study with the longest reported follow-up confirms that off-pump CABG performed by experienced surgeons, who perform only off-pump procedures in a high-volume off-pump coronary surgery centre, is associated with lower risk of operative deaths, fewer postoperative complications and similar 20-year survival and freedom from reintervention rates compared with on-pump CABG.

Current Status of Cardiovascular Surgery in Japan : A Report Based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database in 2017, 2018 2. Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

Data on isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed in 2017 and 2018, and registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database were reviewed for preoperative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and choice of graft material for the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Isolated CABG was performed off-pump in 54.6% (n＝14,684) of all CABG cases (n＝26,913), and graft material for the LAD was left internal thoracic artery in 76.4% and right internal thoracic artery in 19.0%. Operative mortality was 1.5% in elective cases (On-pump CABG : ONCAB 1.9%, off-pump CABG : OPCAB 1.2%, p＜0.001), 7.4% in emergency cases (ONCAB 10.2%, OPCAB 4.3%, p＜0.001), and 2.5% overall. Postoperative morbidity was low in almost all aspects in OPCAB, and average JapanSCORE II is elevating every year. Overall short-term operative results for isolated CABG is stable, and operative candidates are shifting to higher-risk patients.

Current Status of cardiovascular surgery in Japan, 2015 and 2016: a report based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database. 2-Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Data on isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed in 2015 and 2016, and registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database were reviewed for preoperative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and choice of graft material for the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Isolated CABG was performed off-pump in 55.0% (n = 16,173) of all CABG cases (n = 29,392), and graft material for the LAD was positioned at the internal thoracic artery in 72.1% and at the right internal thoracic artery in 17.4% of patients. Operative mortality was 1.7% in elective cases, 8.8% in emergency cases, and 3.0% overall, which was similar to our previous report. In elective cases, operative mortality was 1.1% for off-pump CABG compared with 2.5% for on-pump CABG, and all morbidities except for "readmission < 30 days" were significantly better in OPCAB cases.

Current Status of Cardiovascular Surgery in Japan : Analysis of Data from Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database in 2015, 2016 / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

We reviewed the data of the isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures performed in 2015 and 2016, as registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database, for preoperative characteristics, surgical outcomes, and the choice of graft material used for the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Isolated CABG was performed off-pump in 55.0% (n = 16,173) of all CABG cases (n = 29,392). The left internal thoracic artery and the right internal thoracic artery were used as the graft materials in 72.1 and 17.4% cases respectively. The operative mortality rates remained unchanged since the last report, with 1.7% for elective cases, 8.8% for emergency cases, and 3.0% overall. In elective cases, the operative mortality rate was 1.1% for off-pump CABG (OPCAB) compared with 2.5% for on-pump CABG. The morbidity rates for all OPCAB cases were significantly better except for those falling in the ‘readmission ＜30 days’ group.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have worse adverse cardiovascular outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the adverse cardiovascular outcomes between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) in these patients have been a subject of debate. METHODS: We undertook a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database to identify all relevant studies comparing techniques between OPCAB and ONCAB in CKD patients. We pooled the odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) from individual studies and conducted heterogeneity, quality assessment, and publication bias analyses. RESULTS: This meta-analysis includes 17 studies with 201,889 patients. In CKD patients, OPCAB was associated with significantly lower early mortality as compared to ONCAB (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.93; p < 0.0001). OPCAB was associated with decreased risk of atrial fibrillation (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.34-0.97; p = 0.04), cerebrovascular accident (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.95; p = 0.04), blood transfusion (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.08-0.49; p = 0.0005), pneumonia, prolonged ventilation, and shorter hospital stays. No difference was found regarding long-term survival (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.86-1.36; p = 0.51) or myocardial infarction (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.30-1.38; p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ONCAB, OPCAB is associated with superior postoperative morbidity and the early mortality in CKD patients. Long-term survival is comparable between the two surgical revascularizations.

Current status of cardiovascular surgery in Japan, 2013 and 2014: A report based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database 3. Coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Data on isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed in 2013 and 2014, and registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database were reviewed for preoperative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and choice of graft material for the left anterior descending artery (LAD). RESULTS: Isolated CABG was performed off-pump in 54.7% of cases, and graft material for the LAD was left internal thoracic artery in 74.3% and right internal thoracic artery in 15.6%. Operative mortality was 2.0% in elective cases, 8.2% in emergency cases, and 3.0% overall. In elective cases, operative mortality was 1.1% for off-pump CABG compared with 3.0% for on-pump CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical results of our isolated CABG were reasonable and acceptable.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Clinical Outcomes in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of 14 Randomized Controlled Trials.

The purpose of this article is to perform the first pooled analysis on remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) used for the improvement of clinical outcomes of patients only undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science to identify studies that described the effect of RIPC on postoperative mortality in patients only undergoing on-pump CABG. The outcomes included postoperative mortality, postoperative morbidity (including incidence of myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, stroke, acute kidney injury, and renal replacement therapy), mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and hospital length of stay (HLOS). A total of 14 RCTs (2830 participants) were included. Our meta-analysis found that RIPC failed to reduce the postoperative mortality in patients only undergoing on-pump CABG compared with control individuals (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, [0.40, 1.64]; P = 0.55; I2 = 25%). Moreover, there were no differences in postoperative morbidity, ICU LOS, and HLOS between the two groups. However, MV in the RIPC group was shorter than that in control individuals (standard mean difference, -0.41; 95% confidence interval, [-0.80, -0.01]; P = 0.04; I2 = 73%). The present meta-analysis found that RIPC failed to improve most of clinical outcomes in patients only undergoing on-pump CABG; however, MV was reduced. Adequately powered trials are warranted to provide more evidence in the future.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: The effects of off-pump CABG (OFF-CABG) versus on-pump CABG (ON-CABG) in diabetic patients remain controversial. The aim of our study was to compare mortality and postoperative morbidity between OFF-CABG and ON-CABG for diabetic patients. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for studies investigating clinical outcomes of OFF-CABG versus ON-CABG in diabetic patients were searched, collecting data from inception until June 2016. We pooled the odds ratios from individual studies and performed heterogeneity, quality assessment and publication bias analysis. RESULTS: A total of 543,220 diabetic patients in 10 studies were included. The overall mortality (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.58-1.31; p = 0.50) was comparable between the OFF-CABG and ON-CABG. OFF-CABG was associated with significantly fewer cerebrovascular accidents (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.65; p < 0.0001), bleeding complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43-0.80; p < 0.001) and pulmonary complications. However, no differences in myocardial infarction (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-1.12; p = 0.16), renal failure (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50-1.11; p = 0.14) and other postoperative morbidity outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS: OFF-CABG significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative cerebrovascular accidents and bleeding complications compared with ON-CABG in diabetic patients. No differences were found regarding mortality, myocardial infarction and renal failure between these two techniques. Our study suggests that OFF-CABG may be an optimal strategy for diabetic patients although adequately powered randomized trials are needed to further verify the finding.

A meta-analysis of randomized trials for long-term major complications following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting / 天津医药

Objective To compare the long-term complications of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of long-term complications of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. According to the Cochrane system evaluation method, the quality of the research literature was evaluated by the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the RevMan5.2 software was used for meta analysis. Results A total of 9 studies were included, including 11 660 patients, 5 794 patients in the OPCABG group and 5 866 cases in the ONCABG group. There was no significant difference in mortality between the OPCABG group and the ONCABG group (OR=1.10, 95%CI:0.94-1.30,P=0.22] and no significant difference in myocardial infarction (OR=0.90, 95%CI:0.76-1.06,P=0.21). However, the difference in revascularization was statistically significant between the two groups (OR=1.41, 95%CI:1.09-1.83,P=0.009). The long-term incidence of stroke was significantly lower in OPCABG group than that of ONCABG group (OR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.57-0.98,P=0.04]. Conclusion The on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting can effectively reduce the occurrence of long-term revascularization. However, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting can effectively reduce the risks of stroke.