Does selective intraoperative music reduce pain following abdominal wall reconstruction? A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR. METHODS: We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score). RESULTS: 178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Optimizing pain management in spinal surgery is crucial for preventing adverse events due to delayed mobilization. Magnesium sulfate has potential benefits in spinal surgery because of its analgesic properties and modulation of neurotransmitters and autonomic nervous system. Existing evidence regarding the use of magnesium sulfate is partial and controversial, necessitating a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in spinal surgery compared to other available options. This meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Patients undergoing spinal surgery were included, with the intervention group receiving intravenous magnesium sulfate (MS) at various doses or combinations, whereas the comparison group received other alternatives or a placebo. The efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed. Data were collected from multiple databases and analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed and fixed- or random-effects models were applied. The meta-analysis included eight studies (n = 541). Magnesium sulfate demonstrated significant reductions in pain at 24 h (MD -0.20, 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.02) and opioid consumption (SMD -0.66, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.38) compared to placebo. Additionally, a decrease in the use of muscle relaxants (SMD -0.91, 95% CI: -1.65 to -0.17) and remifentanil (SMD -1.52, 95% CI: -1.98 to -1.05) was observed. In contrast, an increase in extubation time (MD 2.42, 95% CI: 1.14 to 3.71) and verbal response (MD 1.85, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.58) was observed compared to dexmedetomidine. In conclusion, magnesium sulfate administration in spinal surgery reduced pain and opioid consumption, and prolonged orientation and verbal response. No significant differences in blood pressure or heart rate were observed between the groups.

Ultrasound-guided mid point-transverse process to pleura block versus thoracic paravertebral block in pediatric open-heart surgery: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The mid point-transverse process to pleura block (MTPB) is a new variant of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB). This study aimed to compare TPVB and MTPB with respect to intraoperative attenuation of the hemodynamic stress response to surgery and postoperative analgesia in pediatric open heart surgery with midline sternotomy. DESIGN: A single-center, randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority study. SETTING: Tertiary care children's university hospital. PATIENTS: We recruited 83 children aged 2-12 years of both sexes with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class II who were scheduled for elective open cardiac surgeries with midline sternotomy for the repair of simple noncyanotic congenital heart defects. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible participants were randomized into either the TPVB or MTPB groups at a ratio of 1:1. In the TPVB group, patients were bilaterally injected with 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine in the paravertebral space at T4 and T5. In the MTPB group, patients were bilaterally injected with 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine mid-transverse process and pleura just posterior to superior costotransverse ligament at the level of T4 and T5. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the hemodynamic responses to sternotomy incision, including heart rate (HR) and invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP), recorded before and after the induction of anesthesia, after skin incision, after sternotomy, 15 min after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and after the closure of the sternum. The secondary outcomes were time needed to perform the bilateral block, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative fentanyl consumption, modified objective pain score (MOPS) measured at 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after extubation, extubation time, intensive care unit (ICU) discharge time, and the incidence of non-surgical complications (postoperative pruritus, postoperative vomiting, pneumothorax, hematoma or local anesthetic toxicity). MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences in HR and MAP in the TPVB group compared with the MTPB group at the following time points: baseline, after induction, after skin incision, after sternotomy, 15 min after CPB, and after sternal closure. Intergroup comparisons of HR and MAP did not reveal significant differences between the groups. The median (IQR) time needed to perform bilateral MTPB (7[6-8] min) was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter than that of TPVB (12[10-13] min). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption and fentanyl consumption in the first postoperative 24 h after extubation were similar in the TPVB and MTPB groups (4[2-4] vs 4[2-4] and 4.66 ± 0.649 vs 4.88 ± 1.082 µg/kg), respectively. Extubation time and ICU discharge time were comparable in the TPVB and MTPB groups (2[1-3] vs 2[1-3] h and 21.2 ± 2.5 vs 20.8 ± 2.6 h), respectively. Measurements of MOPS pain scores at 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after extubation were similar in both groups. The incidence of nonsurgical complications was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: MTPB is non-inferior to TPVB in attenuating the intraoperative hemodynamic stress response to noxious surgical stimuli and in reducing perioperative opioid consumption, extubation time, and ICU discharge time. Moreover, MTPB is technically easier than TPVB and requires less time to perform. Clinical trial registration number The clinical trial registration was prospectively performed at the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202204901612169, approval date 01/04/2022, URL https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=22602).

Enhancing Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review of Mindfulness Therapies and Guided Imagery Interventions.

Background and Objectives: There has been an increasing interest in the use of non-pharmacological approaches for the multidimensional treatment of chronic pain. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of mindfulness-based therapies and Guided Imagery (GI) interventions in managing chronic non-cancer pain and related outcomes. Materials and Methods: Searching three electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed on Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and pilot RCTs investigating mindfulness or GI interventions in adult patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was utilized to assess the quality of the evidence, with outcomes encompassing pain intensity, opioid consumption, and non-sensorial dimensions of pain. Results: Twenty-six trials met the inclusion criteria, with most of them exhibiting a moderate to high risk of bias. A wide diversity of chronic pain types were under analysis. Amongst the mindfulness interventions, and besides the classical programs, Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) emerges as an approach that improves interoception. Six trials demonstrated that mindfulness techniques resulted in a significant reduction in pain intensity, and three trials also reported significant outcomes with GI. Evidence supports a significant improvement in non-sensory dimensions of pain in ten trials using mindfulness and in two trials involving GI. Significant effects on opioid consumption were reported in four mindfulness-based trials, whereas one study involving GI found a small effect with that variable. Conclusions: This study supports the evidence of benefits of both mindfulness techniques and GI interventions in the management of chronic non-cancer pain. Regarding the various mindfulness interventions, a specific emphasis on the positive results of MORE should be highlighted. Future studies should focus on specific pain types, explore different durations of the mindfulness and GI interventions, and evaluate emotion-related outcomes.

Narcotic prescribing practices in shoulder surgery before and after the institution of narcotic e-prescribing.

Background: Given the current opioid epidemic, it is crucial to highly regulate the prescription of narcotic medications for pain management. The use of electronic prescriptions (e-scripts) through the hospital's electronic medical record platform allows physicians to fill opioid prescriptions in smaller doses, potentially limiting the total quantity of analgesics patients have access to and decreasing the potential for substance misuse. The purpose of this study is to determine how the implementation of e-scripts changed the quantity of opioids prescribed following shoulder surgeries. Methods: For this single-center retrospective study, data were extracted for all patients aged 18 years or more who received a shoulder procedure between January 2015 and December 2020. Total milligrams of morphine equivalents (MMEs) of opioids prescribed within the 90 days following surgery were compared between 3 cohorts: preimplementation of the 2017 New Jersey Opioid laws (Pre-NJ opioid laws), post-NJ Opioid Laws but pre-escripting, and postimplementation of e-scripting in 2019 (postescripting). Any patient prescribed preoperative opioids, prescribed opioids by nonorthopedic physicians, under the care of a pain management physician, or had a simultaneous nonshoulder procedure was excluded from this study. Results: There were 1857 subjects included in this study; 796 pre-NJ opioid laws, 520 post-NJ opioid laws, pre-escripting, and 541 postescripting. Following implementation of e-scripting on July 1, 2019, there was a significant decrease in total MMEs prescribed (P < .001) from a median of 90 MME (interquartile range 65, 65-130) preimplementation to a median 45 MME (interquartile range 45, 45-90) MME postimplementation Additionally, there was a statistically significant decrease in opioids prescribed for all procedures (P < .001) and for 3 (P < .001) of the 4 orthopedic surgeons included in this study. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in total MMEs prescribed overall, for all shoulder surgeries, and for the majority of our institution's providers in the postoperative period following the e-scripting implementation in July 2019. E-scripting is a valuable tool in conjunction with education and awareness on the national, institutional, provider, and patient levels to combat the opioid epidemic.

Erector spinae plane block level does not impact analgesic efficacy in enhanced recovery for lumbar spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative pain control following spine surgery can be difficult. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs use multimodal approaches to manage postoperative pain. While an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is commonly utilized, the ideal distance for injection from the incision, referred to as the ES (ESPB to mid-surgical level) distance, remains undetermined. PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of varying ES distances for ESPB on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures of postoperative pain within the ERAS protocol. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients who underwent elective lumbar spine fusion surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures include the comparative postoperative NRS scores across groups at immediate (T1), 24 (T2), 48 (T3), and 72 (T4) hours postsurgery. For secondary outcomes, a propensity matching analysis compared these outcomes between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups, with opioid-related recovery metrics also assessed. METHODS: All included patients were assigned to one of three ERAS groups according to the ES distance: Group 1 (G1, ES > 3 segments), Group 2 (G2, ES = 2-3 segments), and Group 3 (G3, ES<2 segments). Each patient underwent a bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 60 mL of diluted ropivacaine or bupivacaine. RESULTS: Patients within the ERAS cohort reported mild pain (NRS < 3), with no significant NRS variation across G1 to G3 at any time. Sixty-five patients were matched across ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The ERAS group exhibited significantly lower NRS scores from T1 to T3 than the non-ERAS group. Total morphine consumption during hospitalization was 26.7 mg for ERAS and 41.5 mg for non-ERAS patients. The ERAS group resumed water and food intake sooner and had less postoperative nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: ESPBs can be effectively administered at or near the mid-surgical level to the low thoracic region for lumbar spine surgeries. Given challenges with sonovisualization, a lumbar ESPB may be preferred to minimize the risk of inadvertent pleural injury.

How low can we go? A randomized controlled trial of low-quantity initial opioid prescriptions for shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgeons are the third most frequent prescribers of opioid medications. Given the current opioid addiction crisis, it is critical to limit opioid prescriptions to the lowest effective dose. In this study, we investigated how the initial opioid prescription after shoulder surgery affects maximum possible opioid consumption. We hypothesized that fewer pills in the initial opioid prescription would lead to less opioid consumption, a lower refill request rate, and fewer post-surgery office contacts for pain. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, 74 adults who underwent shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, or other arthroscopic shoulder procedures were enrolled from December 2020 to July 2022. Follow-up was completed by February 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to receive postoperative prescriptions of seven 5-mg oxycodone pills (n = 20), 15 pills (n = 29), or 23 pills (n = 25). The primary outcome was maximum possible opioid consumption within 2 weeks after surgery, calculated by assuming consumption of all pills in the initial prescription, as well as any refills. Secondary outcomes were the opioid prescription refill request rates, post-surgery pain-related telephone calls or messages to the provider's office ("office contacts") within 2 weeks after surgery, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain scores 2 weeks after surgery. Baseline characteristics did not differ among groups except for mean age, which was younger in the 7-pill group (P = .047). RESULTS: Maximum possible opioid consumption increased with the number of pills initially prescribed, with means of 78 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for the 7-pill group, 118 MME for the 15-pill group, and 199 MME for the 23-pill group (P < .001). None of the secondary outcome measures differed among groups. Refill request rates were 20% for the 7-pill group, 3.4% for the 15-pill group, and 12% for the 23-pill group (P = .20). The proportions of patients with at least 1 office contact were 35% in the 7-pill group, 45% in the 15-pill group, and 28% in the 23-pill group (P = .43). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain scores were 49 in the 7-pill group, 44 in the 15-pill group, and 40 in the 23-pill group (P = .20). CONCLUSION: After shoulder surgery, an initial prescription of fewer opioid pills was associated with less maximum possible opioid consumption without an increase in the percentage of patients requesting opioid refills or contacting the provider's office for pain-related concerns. An initial postoperative prescription of fewer 5-mg oxycodone pills may be equally or more effective compared with larger quantities for most patients.

Ketamine intolerance in patients on enhanced recovery after surgery protocols undergoing colorectal operations.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine is used in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols because of its beneficial antihyperalgesic and antitolerance effects. However, adverse effects such as hallucinations, sedation, and diplopia could limit ketamine's utility. The main objective of this study was to identify rates of ketamine side effects in postoperative patients after colorectal surgery and, secondarily, to compare short-term outcomes between patients receiving ketamine analgesia and controls. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Subjects were adults who underwent ERAS protocol-guided colorectal surgery at a large, integrated health system. Patients were grouped into ketamine-receiving and preketamine cohorts. Patients receiving ketamine were divided into tolerant and intolerant groups. Propensity score-adjusted models tested multivariate associations of ketamine tolerance/intolerance vs control group. RESULTS: A total of 732 patients underwent colorectal surgery within the ERAS program before ketamine's introduction (control). After ketamine's introduction, 467 patients received the medication. Intolerance was seen in 29% of ketamine recipients, and the most common side effect was diplopia. Demographics and surgical variables did not differ between cohorts. Multivariate models revealed no significant differences in hospital stays. Pain scores in the first 24 hours after surgery were slightly higher in patients receiving ketamine. Opiate consumption after surgery was lower for both ketamine tolerant and ketamine intolerant cohorts than for controls. CONCLUSION: Rates of ketamine intolerance are high, which can limit its use and potential effectiveness. Ketamine analgesia significantly reduced opiate consumption without increasing hospital stays after colorectal surgery, regardless of whether it was tolerated.

Efficacy of Bilateral Erector Spinae Block in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spine Fusion Surgeries: A Comparative Randomised Controlled Trial.

Introduction During spine surgeries, various levels of tissue injury can result in varying hemodynamic responses and significant postoperative pain. Perioperative pain management is essential to controlling hemodynamic responses and postoperative pain management. Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks can help alleviate this pain by blocking the dorsal rami of the spinal nerve. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ESP by assessing the perioperative opioid requirement, hemodynamic parameters, and visual analogue score (VAS) during the postoperative period. Methods In this study, 56 patients underwent elective posterior spine fusion surgeries under conventional anaesthesia and were allocated into two groups: 28 patients were included in the conventional group (Group C) and 28 patients in the ESP group (Group E). Group C patients received 20 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) on each side, and Group E patients received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone on each side under ultrasound sonography guidance. Postoperative pain was assessed using the VAS score. The hemodynamic parameters during the intraoperative period, the time for the first opioid analgesia requirement until 24 hours in the postoperative period, and the amount of cumulative opioid consumption during the perioperative period were observed. Results Postoperative VAS was lower in Group E (P < 0.001). There were significant differences in hemodynamic parameters: heart rate (P < 0.045), systolic blood pressure (P < 0.002), diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.003), and mean arterial pressure (P < 0.002) at the time of incision in Group E. Intraoperative opioid requirements at the time of incision (P < 0.036), 60th minutes (P < 0.023), 120th minutes (P < 0.023), and postoperative opioid requirements at the first hour (P < 0.001), sixth hour (P < 0.004), 14th hour (P < 0.025), 20th hour (P < 0.009), and 24th hour (P < 0.025) had lower opioid requirements in Group E than Group C. Conclusion ESP block is a more site-specific dorsal rami block with a better perioperative hemodynamic profile, a part of multimodal analgesia intraoperatively, and excellent postoperative analgesia with fewer postoperative opioid requirements in multilevel spine fusion surgeries.

Enhancing Pain Management for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair With a Novel Long-Acting Bupivacaine Drug Device (Xaracoll®) in Multimodal Pain Control: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Post-Operative Opioid Prescribing.

Background Xaracoll® is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Type 1 Bovine collagen-based bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCl) implant developed to provide postoperative pain management for up to 24 hours after open inguinal hernia repair in adults. This retrospective review examined the efficacy of Xaracoll® in the management of postoperative pain compared to injectable Bupivacaine. Methods This retrospective study examines 54 patients who underwent unilateral open inguinal hernia repair by a single surgeon over three years. The control group consisted of 36 patients who received injectable Bupivacaine as the local anesthetic. Eighteen patients received the Xaracoll® drug device intra-operatively following the FDA-approved manufacturer's guidelines. Intra-operative analgesics administered and quantified by oral morphine equivalents (OME), opioid administration for pain control postoperatively, opioid prescriptions upon discharge, postoperative pain scores, and turnaround time (TAT) were compared. Results The use of Xaracoll® in inguinal hernia repair is associated with a decrease in the rate of opioid administration in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (22.2% vs. 52.8%; p = 0.043). In addition, patients requiring opioids in the outpatient setting needed significantly less OME in the Xaracoll® group compared to the control group (52.50 vs. 136.15; p < .001). Conclusion This study demonstrates compelling evidence that Xaracoll® is a useful analgesia adjuvant for inguinal hernia repair, significantly reducing the need for opioids in the PACU and decreasing doses of opioid medications upon discharge. Xaracoll® is effective in minimizing postoperative pain and opioid medication dosages upon discharge as part of a multimodal approach to pain and improving patient experience. Further research is warranted to evaluate Xaracoll®'s role in pain control in the PACU and on discharge.

Utilizing Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Pain Management in Pediatric Patients during Embolization and Sclerotherapy for Vascular Malformations.

Vascular anomalies are a diverse group of abnormal blood vessel developments that can occur at birth or shortly afterward. Embolization and sclerotherapy have been utilized as a treatment option for these malformations but may cause moderate-to-severe pain. This study aims to evaluate the utilization of peripheral nerve blocks in opioid consumption, pain scores, and length of stay. A retrospective chart review was conducted at the UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh for all patients who underwent embolization and sclerotherapy between 2011 and 2020. Patient data were collected to compare opioid consumption, pain scores, and length of stay. In total, 854 procedures were performed on 347 patients. The morphine milligram equivalent per kilogram mean difference between groups was 0.9 (0.86, 0.95) with a p-value of <0.001. The pain score mean ratio was -1.17 (-2.2, -0.1) with a p-value of 0.027. The length of stay had an incident rate ratio of 0.94 (0.4, 2) and a p-value of 0.875. By decreasing opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores, peripheral nerve blocks may have utility in patients undergoing embolization and sclerotherapy while not clinically increasing the length of stay for patients. Their use should be individualized and carefully discussed with the interventional radiologist.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Analgesic Effects of Lidocaine Administered Intravenously or Intraperitoneally Post-Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Reducing postoperative pain is still a tremendous challenge for perioperative clinicians. Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that belongs to the amide class and has anti-inflammatory, anti-hyperalgesic, and analgesic effects. Extensive research has been conducted to determine the optimal route for its administration. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine with that of intraperitoneal lidocaine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: EMBASE, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published through December 2022 that compared patients receiving perioperative intravenous lidocaine with those receiving intraperitoneal lidocaine. The primary outcome measures included the pain score, as evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale, and opioid analgesia requirements. The secondary outcome measures were hospitalization length, gastrointestinal function recovery, etc. The data were acquired and recorded in electronic spreadsheets that had been designed for this purpose. METHODS: This systematic review's design was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method was used to examine the certainty of the evidence. Furthermore, we examined the dependability of the calculated (favorable) treatment effects through considerations of information size and modified significance thresholds (trial sequential analysis). RESULTS: Seven trials including 478 patients were included. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that compared with intravenous lidocaine, patients who received intraperitoneal lidocaine had lower pain scores at 4 hours (mean difference [MD] 1.40; 95% CI, 0.22 to 2.59); 12 hours (MD 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.30); and 24 hours (MD -0.12; 95% CI -0.40 to 0.17) postsurgery. However, no obvious difference in opioid consumption (P > 0.05) was found. In addition, the intraperitoneal lidocaine group had a longer postsurgery hospital stay than the intravenous lidocaine group (95%CI, -0.17 to -0.00; I2 = 0%). Intravenous lidocaine was more beneficial for achieving gastrointestinal return than intraperitoneal lidocaine (95% CI, -0.26 to -0.10; I2 = 2%). LIMITATIONS: The sample size of enrolled RCTs was small, which could potentially result in an overestimation or underestimation of the treatment effect in the collected data. There was high heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that post-abdominal surgery intraperitoneal lidocaine administration has a better analgesic effect than intravenous lidocaine, with a lower pain score. However, intravenous lidocaine is more beneficial for gastrointestinal recovery after abdominal surgery.

The Role of Ketamine as a Component of Multimodal Analgesia in Burns: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: Burn wound dressing and debridement are excruciatingly painful procedures that call for appropriate analgesia-typically multimodal. Better post-procedural pain management, less opioid use, and consequently fewer side effects, which could prolong recovery and increase morbidity, are all benefits of this type of analgesia. Intravenously administered ketamine can be effective as monotherapy or in combination with opioids, especially with procedural sedation such as in burn wound dressing. Methods: This observational study investigated the effect of ketamine administered in subanesthetic doses combined with opioids during burn wound dressing. The study was conducted from October 2018 to October 2021. A total of 165 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 82 patients were in the ketamine group, while 83 patients were dressed without ketamine. The main outcome was the effect of ketamine on intraprocedural opioid consumption. The secondary outcome included the effect of ketamine on postprocedural pain control. Results: Patients dressed with ketamine were significantly older (p = 0.001), while the mean doses of intraoperatively administered propofol and fentanyl were significantly lower than in patients dressed without ketamine (150 vs. 220 mg, p < 0.001; and 0.075 vs. 0.150 mg, p < 0.001; respectively). Conclusions: Ketamine was an independent predictor of lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption, according to the multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.015). Contrarily, both groups of patients required postoperative tramadol treatment, while intraoperative ketamine administration had no beneficial effects on postoperative pain management.

Opioid Consumption After Discharge From Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pain is challenging after recovery from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures, and patients often receive prescription opioids. However, opioid consumption by patients remains unclear, and unused opioids may lead to risks including misuse and diversion. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare prescription size versus patient-reported consumption of opioids after discharge following TKA and THA. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for publications published between 2015 and 2022 on patient-reported consumption of opioids after TKA and THA. The primary outcome was opioid use in oxycodone 5-mg equivalents. Team members independently reviewed studies for screening, inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias. RESULTS: Among the 17 included studies (15 TKA and 11 THA), discharge opioid prescribing exceeded consumption for both TKA (88.4 versus 65.0 pills at 6 weeks) and THA (64.0 versus 29.8 pills at 12 weeks). For both TKA and THA, the range of opioids prescribed varied significantly, by 1.6-fold for TKA and 2.8-fold for THA. Most studies reported pain outcomes (89%) and the use of nonopioid medications (72%). Of the 4 studies offering prescribing recommendations, the amounts ranged from 50 to 104 pills for TKA and 30 to 45 pills for THA. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing exceeds the amount consumed following TKA and THA. These findings serve as a call to action to tailor prescribing guidelines to how much patients actually consume while emphasizing the use of nonopioid medications to better optimize recovery from surgery.

Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Alone in Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control of Posterior Lumbosacral Spine Fixation Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: As posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries are common spine procedures done nowadays due to different causes and mostly accompanied with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, so should find effective postoperative analgesia for these patients. This study aimed to observe analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine versus bupivacaine alone for erector spinae plane block ESPB for postoperative pain control of posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries. Methods: Double-blind randomized controlled study including 90 patients who were randomly allocated into 3 groups (30 patients for each): Dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine (DB group), bupivacaine (B group), and saline (control) (S group). US-guided ESPB was performed preoperatively bilaterally in all patients of the 3 groups. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled postoperative analgesia with morphine and 1 gm intravenous paracetamol every 8 hours. Primary clinical outcomes were active (while mobilization) and passive (at rest) visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at first 24 hours measured every 2 hours, opioid consumption (number of PCA presses), and need for rescue analgesia. Other clinical outcomes included active and passive VAS pain score at second 24 hours, measured every 4 hours, opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia, postoperative opioid side effects, and intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects as bradycardia and hypotension. Results: Active and passive VAS pain scores, postoperative opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia, and postoperative opioid side effects were significantly lower in DB group when compared to other groups (B and S groups). There were no additional intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects as bradycardia and hypotension. The estimated effect-size r was -0.58 and Cohen's d was -1.46. Conclusion: Addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine 0.25% in ESPB for postoperative pain control in patients of posterior lumbosacral spine fixation surgeries resulted in lower active and passive VAS pain scores, decreased postoperative opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesia and postoperative opioid side effects without additional intraoperative dexmedetomidine side effects. Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT05590234.

Perioperative analgesic efficacy of lumbar erector spinae plane block in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy: a randomized blinded clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative analgesic effect of the unilateral lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPBL) in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded clinical study. ANIMALS: A total of 30 client-owned dogs undergoing thoracolumbar or lumbar hemilaminectomy for intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE). METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned to receive a unilateral ESPBL, performed either with 0.4 mL kg-1 ropivacaine 0.5% [group ROPI (n = 15)] or with saline solution [CNT group (n = 15)]. Dogs were premedicated intravenously (IV) with acepromazine 5 µg kg-1 and methadone 0.2 mg kg-1, general anaesthesia was induced by administering IV midazolam 0.2 mg kg-1 and propofol to effect and maintained with isoflurane. Fentanyl was administered as rescue analgesia. Bradycardia [heart rate (HR) < 60 beats minute-1] with hypotension was treated with atropine IV. The Short-Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale was used pre- and postoperatively at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours after extubation, and methadone 0.2 mg kg-1 was administered IV when pain score was ≥ 5/20. HR and end-tidal concentration of isoflurane (Fe'Iso) were compared between groups with anova combined with a Dunnet's post hoc test. Time to the first rescue methadone and total dose of fentanyl (FENtot, µg kg-1 hour-1) and methadone (METtot, mg kg-1) in the first 24 postoperative hours were compared using unpaired Student's t test. Postoperative pain scores were compared with the Mann-Whitney test and atropine administration with a Fisher's exact test; p < 0.05. RESULTS: HR, Fe'Iso, FENtot, METtot and atropine administration were significantly lower in group ROPI compared to CNT. Postoperative analgesic effect was significantly longer, and pain scores were significantly lower in group ROPI for all time points. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Unilateral ESPBL with ropivacaine reduced perioperative opioid consumption and the occurrence of bradycardia in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy.

Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery with Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) emerging as potential techniques. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Outcomes included postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023445513). RESULTS: We included five RCTs encompassing 255 patients. QLB was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative pain (MD -0.45; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.14; and p = 0.004; I2  = 94%). However, we found no difference in 24-h opioid consumption between QLB and TAPB groups. CONCLUSION: QLB may offer superior pain reduction. However, its effect on opioid consumption remains unclear.

Effects of Gabapentin on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Examine the efficacy of gabapentin on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, EBSCO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and gray literature was used to search the literature. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes were reported using the risk ratio and mean difference (MD). Risk of bias and the grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system was used to the assessed quality of evidence. FINDINGS: Nineteen trials involving 2,068 patients were analyzed. Compared to placebo, gabapentin reduced the cumulative pain scores in the first 24 hours after surgery (MD, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.39-0.99; P < .00011), opioid consumption (MD, -3.51; 95% CI, -4.67 to -2.35; P < .00001), and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P < .00001) with prolonged time to first analgesic rescue (MD, 210.9; 95% CI, 76.90-344.91; P = .002). However, gabapentin has little to no effect on the incidence of sedation, somnolence, and respiratory depression. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin can be added as part of the multimodal pain management for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Extrapolation of these findings to clinical settings must take into consideration the limitations identified in this review.

Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the effectiveness of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block in lumbar spine surgeries. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and other gray literature were searched for eligible studies. Risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and standardized mean difference were used to estimate outcomes with suitable effect models. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Risk of Bias algorithm and the grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach. FINDINGS: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials involving 1,327 patients were included. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block demonstrated a lower cumulative pain score within the first 48 hours at rest (MD, -1.03; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.87; P < .00001) and during activity (MD, -1.16; 95% CI, -1.24 to -1.08; P < .00001). In addition, ESP block decreased opioid consumption (MD, -6.25; 95% CI, -8.33 to -4.17; P < .00001) and prolonged the time to first analgesic rescue (MD, 5.66; 95% CI, 3.11-8.20; P < .0001) resulting in fewer patients requesting rescue analgesic (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.83; P = .02), lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.79; P = .02) with improved patient satisfaction score (standardized mean difference, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.40-2.94; P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: ESP block can provide effective postoperative pain control for lumbar spine surgery, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce the amount of postoperative opioid use.