Association between hospital palliative care team intervention volume and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer are well established. However, the effect of the skills of the palliative care team (PCT) on patient outcomes remains unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the association between hospital PCT intervention volume and patient outcomes in patients with cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and PCT intervention from 2015 to 2020 were included. The outcomes were incidence of hyperactive delirium within 30 days of admission, mortality within 30 days of admission, and decline in activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge. The exposure of interest was hospital PCT intervention volume (annual number of new PCT interventions in a hospital), which was categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-volume groups according to tertiles. Multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic-spline regression were conducted. RESULTS: Of 29,076 patients, 1495 (5.1%), 562 (1.9%), and 3026 (10.4%) developed delirium, mortality, and decline in ADL, respectively. Compared with the low hospital PCT intervention volume group (1-103 cases/year, n = 9712), the intermediate (104-195, n = 9664) and high (196-679, n = 9700) volume groups showed significant association with lower odds ratios of 30-day delirium (odds ratio, 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91] and 0.80 [0.69-0.93], respectively), 30-day mortality (0.73 [0.60-0.90] and 0.59 [0.46-0.75], respectively), and decline in ADL (0.77 [0.70-0.84] and 0.52 [0.47-0.58], respectively). CONCLUSION: Hospital PCT intervention volume is inversely associated with the odds ratios of delirium, mortality, and decline in ADL among hospitalized patients with cancer.

The effect of palliative care team intervention and symptom improvement using patient-reported outcomes: a multicenter prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Hospital-based palliative care teams (HPCTs) are widespread internationally, but multicenter studies about their effectiveness, using patient-reported outcomes (PROs), are limited to Australia and a few other countries. We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study in Japan to explore the effectiveness of the HPCTs using PROs. METHODS: Nationwide, eight hospitals participated in the study. We included newly referred patients for one month in 2021 and followed them for one month. We asked the patients to complete the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale or the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as PROs at the time of the intervention, three days later, and weekly after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 318 participants were enrolled, of whom 86% were patients with cancer, 56% were undergoing cancer treatment, and 20% received the Best Supportive Care. After one week, the following 12 symptoms showed more than a 60% improvement from severe to moderate or less: vomiting (100%), shortness of breath (86%), nausea (83%), practical problems (80%), drowsiness (76%), pain (72%), poor sharing of feelings with family or friends (72%), weakness (71%), constipation (69%), not feeling at peace (64%), lack of information (63%), and sore or dry mouth (61%). Symptoms with improvement from severe/moderate to mild or less were vomiting (71%) and practical problems (68%). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study showed that HPCTs effectively improved symptoms in several severe conditions, as assessed by PROs. This study also demonstrated the difficulty of relieving symptoms in patients in palliative care and the need for improved care.

Sedation in pediatric palliative care: The role of pediatric palliative care teams.

OBJECTIVES: Palliative sedation (PS) consists of the use of drugs to alleviate the suffering of patients with refractory symptoms, through a reduction in consciousness. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence of and indications for PS in patients treated by pediatric palliative care teams (PPCT), and the relationship between PS, the place of death, and the characteristics of the care teams. METHODS: Ambispective study with the participation of 14 PPCT working in Spain. RESULTS: From January to December 2019, a total of 164 patients attended by these PPCT died. Of these, 83 (50.6%) received PS during their last 24 hours. The most frequent refractory symptoms were terminal suffering (n = 40, 48.2%), dyspnea (n = 9, 10.8%), pain (n = 8, 9.6%), and convulsive state (n = 7, 8.4%). Sedation in the last 24 hours of life was more likely if the patient died in hospital, rather than at home (62.9% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.01); if the parents had not expressed their preference regarding the place of death (69.2% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.009); and if the PPCT had less than 5 years' experience (66.7% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.018). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: PS is a real possibility in pediatric end-of-life care and relates to care planning and team expertise.

Outcomes of an Acute Palliative Care Unit at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Korea.

Background: The acute palliative care unit (APCU) bridges between active cancer treatment and hospice care. However, no study has proven the efficacy of APCU in Korea. Objective: To evaluate the first-year outcomes of the patients admitted to an APCU at a tertiary hospital in Korea. Design: The APCU admitted 205 patients between April 14, 2014, and April 30, 2015. Of these patients, 57 were evaluable for baseline and one-week follow-up Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Results: Of the 57 participants, 56.1% were male, with a median age of 60 years (range, 52.8-69.5 years). All patients had advanced cancer, and 42 out of 57 had terminal illnesses. The median APCU stay was 14 days (range, 10-17 days). The 42 (73.7%) patients were referred to the APCU after anticancer treatment was completed. Ten (17.5%) patients died during their stay, and 20 (35.1%) were discharged home. Among those who completed the ESAS, there were significant improvements in scores in the following symptoms: fatigue, depression, loss of appetite, and shortness of breath. Physical symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, drowsiness, appetite, and shortness of breath) and the total ESAS scores were significantly improved (p = 0.002 and p = 0.005, respectively). Each non-medical palliative care program, such as art and music therapy, yoga, foot massage, haircut, and body care, showed no significant differences between the group who received them and those who did not. Conclusion: During the APCU stay, the overall symptoms of inpatients were reduced. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary team approach is essential for patients who need palliative care.

Cachexia staging score predicts survival in patients with cancer who receive palliative care.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the cachexia staging score (CSS), a multidimensional, item-based diagnostic method of cachexia severity, for patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care. METHODS: Eligible patients were those with cancer who received palliative care during hospitalization between May 2019 and April 2020. All data were collected retrospectively from medical records. Cachexia was graded into four levels according to the CSS. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed with or without death as the outcome, comparing prognoses among different levels of cachexia with Bonferroni correction. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of the 196 patients was 65.8 ± 14 y. Men made up 42% of the study population. Lower body mass index, increased rate of weight loss, increased strength, assistance walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) points, decline in activities of daily living, appetite loss, and abnormal blood biomarkers were significantly more common with increasing severity of cachexia, and survival was shorter (P < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) increased with worsening severity of cachexia according to CSS classification (precachexia: HR, 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-12.46, P = 0.182; cachexia: HR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.09-20.80; P = 0.038; and refractory cachexia: HR, 11.00; 95% CI, 2.37-51.07; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The CSS predicted life expectancy in a population of patients receiving palliative care and had excellent prognostic discriminative power to classify patients at different stages of cachexia.

Changes in Pediatric Hospital Staff’s Sense of Difficulty Toward Palliative Care:A Single-pediatric Hospital Survey Report

The purpose of this study was to clarify the changes in the sense of difficulty hospital staff felt toward palliative care before and after a palliative care team of the pediatric hospital started in-hospital consultation. A self-administered questionnaire about the difficulty, consisting of 21 items in five areas, was used to conduct a survey in 2015 for the pre-consultation period, and in 2018 for the post-consultation period. Responses were obtained from 222 people in the pre-consultation period (response rate of 70.9%) and from 384 people in the post-consultation period (response rate of 87.3%). Over 70% of the respondents were nurses and midwives. A lower sense of difficulty was observed in three of the items including “relief of painful symptoms”, “family care during caregiving”, and “support when oneself and surrounding staff feeling inadequate and lost”. Further, a significant decrease was observed in the sense of difficulty in six items reported by nurses and midwives in departments receiving the interventions. Eleven of the 16 cases in which the palliative care team intervened involved multiple requests for intervention for 2 patients with pain control difficulties, suggesting that the consultation activities contributed to the decrease in the sense of difficulty experienced by nurses and midwives.

A Strategy for Inpatient Evaluation and Improvement of the Quality of Our Palliative Care Team: Iterative Evaluations of Changes in a Palliative Screening Tool

To introduce early palliative care to patients, we have proactively used a palliative care screening tool to identify needs. We have emphasized not doing work in a routine manner, rather seeking to improve by continuous reevaluations. Because of a lack of feedback regarding changes in screening scores and actionable solutions derived from it, we executed a retrospective study about the effectiveness of our palliative care team and the identification of problems. All 91 cases studied meaningfully ameliorated their focused symptoms. However, we could not verify our team’s effectiveness because the backgrounds of patients who were eligible but not involved with our team differed significantly. The current study suggested that some patients missed opportunities to receive palliative care. We need to strengthen the system used with our patients as a safety-net so as not to overlook care opportunities by utilizing more effective screening methodology.

Five Years of Activity in Our Palliative Care Team and Coronavirus Disease

Purpose: We investigated the activity of our palliative care team over the past five years and how the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) affects palliative care in our hospital. Methods: We retrospectively compared and analyzed patient data intervened by the Tokyo Medical University Hospital Palliative Care Team from April 2016 to March 2021. Results: There were no major differences in the total number of requests, patient background, reasons for request, and reasons for intervention from FY2016 to FY2020. In FY2020, the number of patients with PS0 at the time of request and who discharged from the hospital at home increased significantly compared to other years. Discussion and Conclusion: From the results of this survey, it was found that the introduction of palliative care from an early stage is progressing. On the other hand, because the outbreak of COVID-19 has restricted visits to inpatients at our hospital, it is possible that the proportion of patients who choose home care is increasing. Intervention requests to the palliative care team did not change significantly over the 5-year period without the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Strict visitation restrictions for inpatients have become barriers to the practice of palliative care.

Impact of interprofessional collaborative practice in palliative care on outcomes for advanced cancer inpatients in a resource-limited setting.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care for patients with advanced cancer improves suffering symptoms, and quality of life (QoL). However, routine implementation of palliative care by specialty palliative care consultation is still an unmet need among in-patients with advanced cancer. Our study aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based approach on QoLs and readmission rate when compared to routine practice by among medical oncologists. METHODS: This study was a prospective, Quasi-Experimental design. In-patients with advanced cancer were non-randomly assigned to receive palliative care service by team-based approach or medical oncologists only. The primary endpoint was QoL. The secondary endpoint was the readmission rate at 7 and 30 days of hospital discharge. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two in-patients were enrolled. In-patients who were assessed by a team-based approach had significantly improved change scores of subjective well-being (SWB) when compared to another group (∆ SWB: -1 [-19 - 11] vs 0 [-9 - 15], p-value = 0.043). Furthermore, patients who were assessed under a team-based approach had significantly decreased in terms of readmission rate at 7 days of hospital discharge (4.92% in the team-based approach group vs. 19.67% in the medical oncologist group, p-value = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary collaboration is the key to success in establishing goals of care, which are supporting the best possible QoL and relieving suffering symptoms for those in-patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, the readmission rate at 7 days of hospital discharge was significantly reduced by a team-based approach. Therefore, comprehensive palliative care assessment by interprofessional collaborative practice is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR): number 20200312001. Date of first registration on 09/03/2020.

A Retrospective Review of the Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients through an Integrated Palliative Care Model during the First Wave of the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created surges of rapidly deteriorating patients straining health care necessitating the evaluation of novel models of palliative care (PC) integration to reduce patient suffering and hospital strain. Objective: To evaluate an integrated PC model's effect on code status change. Design: This is an observational retrospective study. Setting: Urban quaternary referral center in the southeastern United States from April 6th to August 20th, 2020. Patients: All patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit and stepdown unit were diagnosed with COVID-19. Measurements: Code status change, multivariate regression on patient characteristics. Results: In total, 79.7% (98/123) patients were full code at admission. After PC consultation, 33.3% (41/123) patients remained full code, 13.0% (16/123) were do not resuscitate (DNR), and 53.6% (66/123) changed to DNR/do not intubate (DNI). An ordinal logistic model determined that consultation location (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, p = 0.017) and patient age (OR 1.09, p < 0.001) were predictive of code status change to DNR/DNI. Conclusion: Within an integrated PC model, PC consultation was associated with code status change. The effect of an integrated PC model warrants further study in comparison with a traditional PC model in a similar patient cohort.

[Specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) : Basics, indications and prescription in clinical practice]. / Spezialisierte ambulante Palliativversorgung (SAPV) : Grundlagen, Indikation und Verordnung in der klinischen Praxis.

Specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) was introduced by the legislature in 2007 in § 37b of the German Social Code Book V (SGBV) as a form of care for people with a life-limiting illness and an increased complexity of care. It is therefore only required by some of the palliative patients. It is intended to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions and to enable those affected to remain in their home environment in a dignified manner despite a complex illness and to be accompanied there until death. Initially introduced as a form of care for adults, the need for expansion to children and adolescents with life-limiting illnesses soon became apparent, so that care was supplemented in 2011 with specialized pediatric palliative care (SAPPV). Both SAPV and SAPPV involve the use of a specialized and multiprofessional palliative care team (PCT), which is characterized by 24­h accessibility and special qualifications, thus providing comprehensive support. This is provided in addition to general outpatient palliative care (AAPV) and aims to maintain, promote and, if possible, improve the quality of life and self-determination at the end of life as much as possible. The SAPV is a health insurance benefit and requires a prescription via form 63 by a physician.

Caring for Patients in Need of Palliative Care: Is This a Mission for Acute Care Hospitals? Key Questions for Healthcare Professionals.

The prevalence of patients affected by end-stage diseases or advanced cancer is increasing due to an aging population and progression in medicine and public healthcare. The burden of symptoms these people suffer in the last months of life often forces them to seek aid in an emergency department. In developed countries, acute care hospital-based services are often better designed to treat acute clinical conditions than to manage the needs of patients with serious chronic diseases. Thus, the palliative care (PC) population poses very real clinical challenges to healthcare professionals who care for them in hospital settings. The authors have formulated four key questions (who, why, when, and how) to address in order to identify a model for providing the best care for these PC patients. The questions are related to: (1) defining people living with serious chronic diseases; (2) managing the challenge of unplanned hospital admission of these people; (3) identifying PC patients among people with serious chronic diseases; and (4) determining the appropriate work of caring for this inpatient PC population. Clinicians need the knowledge, tools, and services to care for these PC patients, and acute care hospitals should plan the work of caring for these inpatients.

Palliative surgery and the surgeon's role in the palliative care team: a review.

This review focuses on the role of palliative surgery in the care of the palliative care patient, and the appropriate role of the surgeon. The surgeon has much to bring to the palliative care team. The surgeon's role goes beyond the technical requirements of the palliative procedure, which itself must be strictly defined, and has recognized utility for improving quality of life in selected patients. These benefits may be substantial, but come at significant risk; requiring careful balancing of risks and benefits that is most completely understood by the surgeon. The surgeon's judgement can help determine which procedure best meets a patient's goals. The complex dialogue involved in the decision to undergo a palliative operation requires excellent communication between the palliative care team, the patient, and their family. Integrating the surgeon into the palliative care team could help with earlier initiation of those palliative discussions, and assist deliberation of palliative surgery. Surgeons also understand the importance of communication around palliative surgical interventions and have adapted several teaching models to the specifics of this crucial communication. A palliative team combining both surgeons and palliative care physicians may promote goal-concordant decision-making and remove barriers to communication and team engagement. The future of palliative surgery research will involve measures of success that go beyond physiology or mortality, to include more evaluations of communication and patient goals.

Development of a Patient Registry System for Specialized Palliative Care Quality Assessment Using Patient-reported Outcomes: A Multicenter Pilot Study

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a patient registry system for assessing PCT (palliative care team) by PRO (Patient-reported outcome) in Japan. Methods: We operated a patient registry system with electronic data collection at eight hospitals in 2021 in Japan. We consecutively included newly referred patients for a month and followed up with them for a month. IPOS or ESAS obtained as PRO at the start of the intervention, three days later, and every week after. The primary endpoint was the response rate to the symptom rating scale by patients and providers. Results: 318 patients were enrolled. The patient response rate was 59.1% at intervention and 37.0% after intervention, and the medical provider response rate was 98.4% at intervention and 70.3% after intervention. Interviews with PCT members indicated that participants required support to input PRO responses required support and paper questionnaire was better and that managing the survey date and overall management was burdensome. Discussion: Although only about half of the patients were able to respond to the PRO, this was the same level as in previous studies. The system and its operation method have many problems. We found that improvements such as reducing items and making the patient interviews paper-based are necessary to expand the system nationwide.

Seguimiento de pacientes con esclerosis lateral amiotrófica por un equipo de cuidados paliativos domiciliario / Follow-up of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by a home palliative care team

Antecedentes y objetivo: Pocos estudios describen el final de la vida de los pacientes con esclerosis lateral amiotrófica (ELA). Nuestro objetivo principal fue describir la trayectoria final de vidade pacientes con ELA seguidos por un equipo de soporte cuidados paliativos domiciliario (equipode soporte de atención paliativa domiciliaria [ESAPD]). El objetivo secundario fue examinar losfactores asociados con el lugar de muerte y supervivencia.Ámbito y diseño: Estudio observacional retrospectivo en una cohorte de pacientes diagnosticadoscon ELA y seguido por un ESAPD. Se analizaron variables sociodemográficas, la supervivenciadesde el inicio de la ventilación, supervivencia desde el inicio de la gastrostomía, consumode recursos sanitarios, uso de opioides, planificación anticipada de decisiones (PAD), lugar demuerte y causa de muerte.Resultados: Se incluyeron 60 pacientes. Los principales síntomas fueron disnea y disfagia. LaPAD fue trabajada en el 83 % de los pacientes. Cincuenta y dos (83 %) pacientes murieron endomicilio o en una unidad de cuidados paliativos. Se requirieron opioides durante las últimas24 h en el 47 % de los pacientes. La causa de muerte fue por insuficiencia respiratoria, infección respiratoria, muerte durante el sueño y rechazo del tratamiento para el 47, 16, 15 y 15 %respectivamente. El 25 % requirieron sedación paliativa. La supervivencia media desde el iniciode la alimentación enteral, la ventilación mecánica no invasiva y la ventilación invasiva fue de 7, 13 y 12 meses, respectivamente. El número promedio de visitas del ESADP fue de 14 (DE:12). Haber recibido información y no haber sido ingresado en el hospital durante el periodode estudio se asoció con un aumento significativo de la probabilidad de morir en el domicilio.Conclusiones: La causa de muerte más frecuente fue la insuficiencia respiratoria, que en la mayoría de los casos requirió tratamiento con opioides. Uno de cada 4 pacientes requirió sedación paliativa. (AU)

Background and objectives: Few studies have reported end of life for patients with amyotrophiclateral sclerosis (ALS). Our main objective was to describe the end-of-life trajectory of patientsmonitored by a palliative home care team (PHTC). The secondary objective was to examinefactors associated with place of death and survival.Setting and design: A retrospective, observational study in a cohort of patients diagnosed withALS followed by a PHCT. Sociodemographic variables, survival from start of ventilation andgastrostomy, use of health resources, opioid use, care planning, place of death, and cause ofdeath were analyzed.Results: Sixty patients were included. Main symptoms included dyspnea and dysphagia. Advancecare planning was possible for 83 %. Fifty-two (83 %) died at home or in a palliative care unit.The cause of death was respiratory failure, respiratory infection, death during sleep, and refusalof treatment for 47 %, 16 %, 15 % and 15 %, respectively. Opioids were required in 47 %, and 25 %needed palliative sedation. Average survival from start of enteral feeding, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and invasive ventilation was 7, 13 and 12 months, respectively. Average of visitswas 14 (SD 12). Having received informal support and not having been admitted to hospitalduring the study period were associated with a significantly increased rate of dying at home.Conclusions: The most frequent cause of death was respiratory failure, most cases requiredopioids, and one out of every four needed palliative sedation. Most died at home. (AU)

Percepciones de un equipo de cuidados paliativos pediátricos acerca del clown de hospital / Pediatric palliative care team perceptions' about hospital clowns / Percepções de uma equipe de cuidados paliativos pediátricos sobre o clown de hospital

Resumen La presente es una síntesis de resultados de una investigación mayor, cuyo objetivo principal fue conocer las perspectivas de familias y equipo de salud respecto de la presencia de clowns de hospital trabajando en cuidados paliativos pediátricos en una unidad en Chile. Guiado por un paradigma interpretativo, estrictos criterios de calidad y éticos, la metodología utilizada fue de tipo cualitativo, aplicando las técnicas de recolección de datos de entrevistas en profundidad, análisis de documentos y grupos de discusión. La sección de datos sobre el equipo aquí presentados, se analizó a través de las técnicas análisis de contenido y análisis crítico del discurso. Los resultados indican que la figura del clown es percibida como un mediador y valorada como terapia complementaria, especialmente por las competencias socioemocionales de esos profesionales y el juego que se utiliza como herramienta de intervención. Las conclusiones señalan que las competencias socioemocionales que promueve el clown de hospital son fundamentales para el trabajo en cuidados paliativos.

Abstract This is a synthesis of results of a major research which main objective was to know the perspectives of families and the health team regarding the presence of hospital clowns working in pediatric palliative care in a unit in Chile. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, strict quality and ethical criteria, the methodology used was qualitative, applying in-depth interviews, document analysis and discussion groups as data collection techniques. The data section presented here about the health team was analyzed through content analysis and critical discourse analysis techniques. The results indicate that the figure of the clown is perceived as a mediator, valued as complementary therapy, especially due to the socio-emotional competences of these professionals and play used as an intervention tool. The conclusions indicate that the socio-emotional competences promoted by the hospital clown are fundamental to work in palliative care.

Resumo A presente é uma síntese de resultados de uma investigação maior, cujo objetivo principal foi conhecer as perspectivas de famílias e equipe de saúde a respeito da presença de clowns de hospital trabalhando em cuidados paliativos pediátricos em uma unidade no Chile. Guiado por um paradigma interpretativo, critérios estritos de qualidade e éticos, a metodologia utilizada foi de tipo qualitativo, aplicando as técnicas de coleta de dados de entrevistas em profundidade, análise de documentos e grupos de discussão. Os dados sobre a equipe aqui apresentados, foram analisados através das técnicas de análise de conteúdo e análise crítica do discurso. Os resultados indicam que a figura do clown é percebida como um mediador e valorizada como terapia complementar, especialmente pelas capacidades sócio-emocionais desses profissionais e o jogo que se utiliza como ferramenta de intervenção. As conclusões apontam que as capacidades sócio-emocionais que promovem o clown de hospital são fundamentais para o trabalho em cuidados paliativos.

Development of the Dutch Structure for Integrated Children's Palliative Care.

Children's palliative care (CPC) is gaining attention worldwide, facilitated by the exchange of knowledge during regular specialised congresses. This article describes the developments in the Netherlands over the past 15 years. The Foundation for Children's Palliative Expertise (PAL) was established as a nationwide initiative committed to improving palliative care for children countrywide. This led to the development of the first hospital-based CPC team in 2012, which expanded to a total of seven teams adjacent to children's university hospitals. Regional networks for CPC were developed in parallel to these teams from 2014 onwards. The networks are a collaboration of professionals from different disciplines and organisations, from hospital to homecare, and have covered the aspects of CPC nationally from 2019 onwards. They are connected through the Dutch Knowledge Centre for CPC. This centre was established in 2018 by the PAL Foundation in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Pediatrics. In 2013, the first evidence-based guideline, 'palliative care for children', provided access to knowledge for parents and healthcare providers, and in 2017, a format for an individual palliative care plan was established. Within the Knowledge Centre for CPC, a physician's support centre for dilemma's regarding the end of life of children was set up. The efforts to have children's palliative care embedded in the regular Dutch health care insurance are ongoing.

Specialist palliative and end-of-life care for patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection: a European perspective.

BACKGROUND: Specialist palliative care team (SPCT) involvement has been shown to improve symptom control and end-of-life care for patients with cancer, but little is known as to how these have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report SPCT involvement during the first wave of the pandemic and compare outcomes for patients with cancer who received and did not receive SPCT input from multiple European cancer centres. METHODS: From the OnCovid repository (N = 1318), we analysed cancer patients aged ⩾18 diagnosed with COVID-19 between 26 February and 22 June 2020 who had complete specialist palliative care team data (SPCT+ referred; SPCT- not referred). RESULTS: Of 555 eligible patients, 317 were male (57.1%), with a median age of 70 years (IQR 20). At COVID-19 diagnosis, 44.7% were on anti-cancer therapy and 53.3% had ⩾1 co-morbidity. Two hundred and six patients received SPCT input for symptom control (80.1%), psychological support (54.4%) and/or advance care planning (51%). SPCT+ patients had more 'Do not attempt cardio-pulmonary resuscitation' orders completed prior to (12.6% versus 3.7%) and during admission (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001), with more SPCT+ patients deemed suitable for treatment escalation (50% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001). SPCT involvement was associated with higher discharge rates from hospital for end-of-life care (9.7% versus 0%, p < 0.001). End-of-life anticipatory prescribing was higher in SPCT+ patients, with opioids (96.3% versus 47.1%) and benzodiazepines (82.9% versus 41.2%) being used frequently for symptom control. CONCLUSION: SPCT referral facilitated symptom control, emergency care and discharge planning, as well as high rates of referral for psychological support than previously reported. Our study highlighted the critical need of SPCTs for patients with cancer during the pandemic and should inform service planning for this population.

Chemotherapy use in end-of-life digestive cancer patients: a retrospective AGEO observational study.

BACKGROUND: The use of chemotherapy (CT) near the end-of-life (EOL) is an important issue in oncology since it could degrade quality of life. CT near EOL is still poorly studied, with no dedicated study in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients. AIM: To analyze in GI cancer patients the factors associated with the use of CT within 3- and 1-month before patients' death. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: All consecutive patients who died from a GI cancer in 10 French tertiary care hospitals during 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Clinical, demographical and biological data were collected and compared between patients receiving or not CT within 3- and 1-month before death. Variables associated with overall survival (OS) was also determined using of univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox model. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-seven patients with a metastatic GI cancer were included in this study. Among them, 293 pts (67.0%) received CT within 3-months before death, and 121 pts (27.7%) received CT within 1-month before death. Patients receiving CT within 3-months before death were significantly younger (median age: 65.5 vs 72.8 years, p < 0.0001), with a better PS (PS 0 or 1: 53.9 vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) and a higher albumin level (median: 32.8 vs 31.0 g/L, p = 0.048). Similar results were found for CT within 1 month before death. Palliative care team intervention was less frequent in patients who received CT in their last month of life (39.7% vs 51.3%, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, median OS from diagnosis was shorter in the group receiving CT within 1-month before death (HR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.48-0.74]). CONCLUSION: In GI-cancer patients, CT is administered within 3- and 1-month before death, in two and one third of patients, respectively. Patients receiving CT within 1-month before death, had more aggressive disease with poor OS. Palliative care team intervention was associated with less administration of CT in the last month of life. These results highlight the need to better anticipate the time to stop CT treatment in the end-of-life and the importance of an active collaboration between oncology and palliative care teams.

Screening for Distress and Its Impact on Palliative Care Referral at a General Medical Center: Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose: Distress screening is mandated by Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, however there is few data available on its effect in actual practice. We examined the impact of distress screening on palliative care referral at Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center in Japan. Materials and Methods: We implemented distress screening on cancer patients who were given chemotherapy from February 2018. Patients were referred to the palliative care team when the physicians judged the need on the basis of the screening results or when the patients themselves wanted to receive the palliative care service. We examined the number of the patients referred to the palliative care team, then we researched the changes of the number after implementation of the screening, using the regression discontinuity analysis. Results: The distress screening didn’t increase the number of the patients who were referred to the palliative care team: the estimated difference of the number was 3.32 (95% confidence interval: −3.19〜9.82). Conclusion: We implemented distress screening at our hospital but it didn’t increase palliative care referral. Only a few studies have examined how routine screening impacts clinical outcomes. We expect our study helps to research the effectiveness of screening in each healthcare facility.