Pituitary gigantism due to a novel AIP germline splice-site variant.

Pituitary gigantism is a rare pediatric disorder caused by excess growth hormone (GH) secretion. In almost 50% of cases, a genetic cause can be identified, with pathogenic variants in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene being the most common. We present a case of an 11-year-old boy who exhibited progressive vision loss, associated with accelerated linear growth, and weight gain. On physical examination, he had enlarged hands, right eye amaurosis, and was already above his target height. Increased GH and IGF-I concentrations confirmed the diagnosis of pituitary gigantism. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a giant sellar lesion with supra- and para-sellar extensions. He underwent two surgeries which did not achieve a cure or visual improvement. Histopathological analysis revealed a sparsely granulated tumor, negative for somatostatin receptor type 2 (SST2) and an immunoreactivity score of 6 for somatostatin receptor type 5 (SST5). Our published artificial intelligence prediction model predicted an 83% chance of not responding to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands. Pasireotide was therefore prescribed, and afterward cabergoline was added on. IGF-I concentrations decreased but did not normalize. We discovered a novel germline single nucleotide variant in the splicing donor region of intron 2 of the AIP gene (NM_003977.4:c.279+1 G>A), classified as likely pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide in Patients With Acromegaly: 14 Years of Single-Center Real-World Experience.

CONTEXT: Acromegaly is a rare, chronic, debilitating disorder caused by prolonged hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) and overproduction of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Medical therapies, including the somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) pasireotide, are frequently used to restore biochemical control. OBJECTIVE: As patients often receive therapy over prolonged periods, long-term data from real-life settings are needed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using a prospectively maintained database of all patients with acromegaly from our primary care center who were enrolled in clinical studies with pasireotide (first visit November 2008). The main outcome measures were safety and biochemical control (age-adjusted IGF-I ≤ upper limit of normal). RESULTS: Patients (n = 50) entered 4 parental studies and 30 continued in the rollover; at data cutoff (June 2022), 27 were still receiving pasireotide. Overall, median (range) exposure was 58 (3-137) months. Normal IGF-I was achieved in 54%, and acromegaly symptoms and quality of life were improved with treatment. No predictors of pasireotide response were identified; however, controlled patients had smaller tumors and lower GH at baseline. Tumor volume reduction occurred in 63% of evaluable patients (n = 10/16). Most patients presented hyperglycemic events, including 63.2% of patients with normal glucose before treatment. Older patients and those with higher IGF-I, glucose, and HbA1c at baseline had higher glucose and HbA1c during pasireotide treatment. CONCLUSION: Pasireotide provided clinical benefit and was well tolerated for more than 11 years of treatment in acromegaly patients, most of whom were resistant to first-generation SRLs.

Refractory somatotroph adenomas.

Somatotroph adenomas are usually controlled with standard therapy, which can include surgery, medical treatment and radiotherapy. Some tumors have a more aggressive behavior and are refractory to standard therapy. In this review, we summarize the phenotype of these tumors and the current options for their management.

Pituitary acting drugs: cabergoline and pasireotide.

First-line treatment for Cushing´s disease is transsphenoidal surgery. But in cases of persistent or recurrent disease after surgery, contraindications to surgery, severe hypercortisolism control before surgery, or for patients waiting for radiotherapy effects, medical therapy may be indicated. Pituitary-directed agents include cabergoline and pasireotide. Both drugs present similar potential for biochemical control and pasireotide has additionally been proved to reduce tumor volume. Moreover, pasireotide was evaluated in high quality studies. In respect to safety, both drugs are well tolerated and safe, but special attention should be given for cardiac valve disease and psychiatric disorder for cabergoline, and hyperglycemia for pasireotide.

Resolution of Cyclicity After Pasireotide LAR in a Patient With Cushing Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The cyclicity (CIC) of cortisol spontaneously occurs in a minority of patients with Cushing syndrome (CS). When it arises, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches become more challenging. This study aimed to report a patient with Cushing disease (CD) who achieved normalization of cortisol and CIC pattern with pasireotide long-acting release (pasi/LAR). METHODS: A 43-year-old female patient related an 8-month history of CS. An 8-mm pituitary nodule depicted by magnetic resonance imaging, serum cortisol suppression of >50% after 8 mg of dexamethasone therapy, and the absence of other lesions were compatible with a CD diagnosis. The patient presented with a CIC pattern with 1 episode before and 17 episodes after an unsuccessful pituitary surgery. RESULTS: Medical treatment with cabergoline alone up to 3.5 mg/wk and a combined treatment with ketoconazole 400 mg/d did not improve CIC CS. Pasi/LAR was initiated at a dose of 20 mg/mo. A few days after the first dose, the patient experienced symptoms suggestive of adrenal insufficiency. The medication and dose were maintained for 24 months. During this period, there was a normalization of UFC levels and progressive clinical improvement. Additionally, new episodes of CIC were not observed. CONCLUSION: A CD patient with a challenging issue of CIC was reported. The condition was not controlled after pituitary surgery and by the combined treatment with cabergoline and ketoconazole, although hypercortisolism was abated by the continuous use of pasi/LAR. To our knowledge, this is the first report as regards the use of this medication to control CIC in a patient with CD.

Risk factors and management of pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia in acromegaly.

Pasireotide, a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog with highest affinity for somatostatin receptor subtype (SST) 5, has demonstrated superior efficacy over the SST2-preferential somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide. The safety profile is similar to those of octreotide and lanreotide, except for a higher frequency and degree of hyperglycemia. This analysis investigated baseline characteristics and occurrence and management of hyperglycemia during pasireotide treatment in patients with acromegaly treated in two prospective clinical studies, SOM230C2305 (C2305) and SOM230C2402 (C2402; PAOLA). One hundred and seventy-eight patients naïve to medical therapy at baseline (C2305) and 125 uncontrolled on first-generation somatostatin analogs at baseline (C2402) received long-acting pasireotide in these studies. Of patients treated with pasireotide in studies C2305 and C2402, respectively, 75.3 (134/178) and 65.6% (82/125) developed hyperglycemia or experienced worsening of existing hyperglycemia. Occurrence of hyperglycemia during pasireotide treatment was less frequent in patients with lower age (<40 years, C2402; <30 years, C2305), normal glucose tolerance, and no history of hypertension or dyslipidemia at baseline. Thirteen (4%) patients discontinued pasireotide because of hyperglycemia-related adverse events. Metformin alone or in combination with other oral antidiabetic medications controlled elevations in glucose levels in most pasireotide-treated patients; 78% of C2305 patients and 73 (pasireotide 40 mg) and 60% (pasireotide 60 mg) of C2402 patients achieved the ADA/EASD goal of HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) at the end of the core phase. Not all patients develop hyperglycemia, and it is reversible upon pasireotide withdrawal. Close monitoring, patient education and prompt action remain key elements in addressing hyperglycemia during pasireotide treatment.

The position of combined medical treatment in acromegaly

ABSTRACT Advances in combination medical treatment have offer new perspectives for acromegaly patients with persistent disease activity despite receiving the available medical monotherapies. The outcomes of combination medical treatment may reflect both additive and synergistic effects. This review focuses on combination medical treatment and its current position in acromegaly, based on clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined medical treatment(s) and our own experiences with combination therapy. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):646-52

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Pasireotide in Patients With Acromegaly Inadequately Controlled With First-Generation Somatostatin Analogs.

Introduction: Acromegaly is a rare, serious endocrine disorder characterized by excess growth hormone (GH) secretion by a pituitary adenoma and overproduction of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of choice, although many patients require additional interventions. First-generation somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the current standard of medical therapy; however, not all patients achieve control of GH and IGF-I. Outcomes from a Phase IIIb open-label study of patients with uncontrolled acromegaly on first-generation SSAs switching to pasireotide are reported. Methods: Adults with uncontrolled acromegaly (mean GH [mGH] ≥1 µg/L from a five-point profile over 2 h, and IGF-I >1.3× upper limit of normal [ULN]) despite ≥3 months' treatment with maximal approved doses of long-acting octreotide/lanreotide received open-label long-acting pasireotide 40 mg/28 days. Pasireotide dose could be increased (maximum: 60 mg/28 days) after week 12 if biochemical control was not achieved, or decreased (minimum: 10 mg/28 days) for tolerability. Patients who completed 36 weeks' treatment could continue receiving pasireotide during an extension (weeks 36-72) when concomitant medication for acromegaly was permitted. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with mGH <1 µg/L and IGF-I 2.5 µg/L. For patients who entered the extension, 14.8% (95% CI: 8.1-23.9), 12.5% (95% CI: 6.4-21.3), 14.8% (95% CI: 8.1-23.9) and 11.4% (95% CI: 5.6-19.9) had mGH <1 µg/L and IGF-I

Cost-effectiveness of acromegaly treatments: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Acromegaly is a rare disease that results in the enlargement of body extremities and in organomegaly. Treatments include surgery, drugs, and radiotherapy, which are all onerous. Therefore, well-conducted cost-analyses are crucial in the decision-making process. METHODS: A systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies on acromegaly therapies was performed following PRISMA and Cochrane recommendations. The search for records was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (May 2018). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joana Briggs Institute Tool. RESULTS: From initial 547 records, 16 studies were included in the review. The studies could present more than one economic evaluation, and encompassed cost-effectiveness (n = 13), cost-utility (n = 5), and cost-consequence (n = 1) analyses. All studies were model-based and evaluated only direct medical costs. Eleven records did not mention discounting and only 10 performed sensitivity analyses. The characteristic of the studies, the cost-effectiveness results and the studies' conclusions are described and commented upon. The main limitation of the studies was discussed and aspects to improve in future studies were pointed out. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effectiveness studies on acromegaly have been performed in several scenarios, evaluating different phases of treatment. However, the studies present limitations and, overall, were considered of moderate quality. Further economic models should be developed following health economics guidelines recommendations, and must improve transparency.

Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug treatments have been conducted. OBJECTIVES: To conduct the first network meta-analysis simultaneously comparing all available drugs used in acromegaly treatment so as to provide more robust evidence in this field. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations (PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42017059880). The electronic searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing any drug for the treatment of acromegaly head-to-head or versus placebo were included. Outcomes concerning the efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated. The statistical analyses were performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16.8 (drugis.org, Groningen, The Netherlands). RESULTS: The initial search retrieved 2059 articles. Of these, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in a qualitative analysis and 7 in a quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis for the efficacy outcome (number of patients achieving insulinlike growth factor 1 control) showed that pegvisomant and lanreotide autogel were statistically superior to placebo (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 0.06 [0.00-0.55] and 0.09 [0.01-0.88]). No further differences were found. The probability rank indicated that pegvisomant and pasireotide have the highest probabilities (33% and 34%, respectively) of being the best therapeutic options. No major side effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Pegvisomant is still a good option for acromegaly treatment, but pasireotide seems to be a promising alternative. Nevertheless, other important key factors such as drug costs and effectiveness (real-world results) should be taken into account when selecting acromegaly treatment.

Pasireotide treatment does not modify hyperglycemic and corticosterone acute restraint stress responses in rats.

Pasireotide is a new-generation somatostatin analog that acts through binding to multiple somatostatin receptor subtypes. Studies have shown that pasireotide induces hyperglycemia, reduces glucocorticoid secretion, alters neurotransmission, and potentially affects stress responses typically manifested as hyperglycemia and increased corticosterone secretion. This study specifically aimed to evaluate whether pasireotide treatment modifies glucose and costicosterone secretion in response to acute restraint stress. Male Holtzman rats of 150-200 g were treated with pasireotide (10 µg/kg/day) twice-daily for two weeks or vehicle for the same period. Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 5, 10, 30, and 60 min of restraint stress. The three experimental groups comprised of vehicle + restraint (VEHR), pasireotide + restraint (PASR), and pasireotide + saline (PASNR). Following pasireotide treatment, no significant differences in baseline glucose and corticosterone levels were observed among the three groups. During restraint, hyperglycemia was observed at 10 min (p < .01 for both comparisons), peaked at 30 min (p < .01 for both comparisons) and showed higher 60 min areas under glucose curves in the VEHR and PASR stressed groups when compared to the non-stressed PASNR group (p < .05 for both comparisons). Restraint also increased corticosterone secretion in the VEHR and PASR stressed groups at 5 min (p < .01 for both comparisons), and peaked at 30 min (p < .01 for both comparisons) with corresponding higher 60 min areas under corticosterone curves when compared to the non-stressed PASNR group (p < .01 for both comparisons). In conclusion, pasireotide treatment does not modify hyperglycemic- and corticosterone-restraint stress responses, thus preserving acute stress regulation.

Somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly.

First-generation somatostatin receptors ligands (SRL) are the mainstay in the medical treatment of acromegaly, however the percentage of patients controlled with these drugs significantly varies in the different studies. Many factors are involved in the resistance to SRL. In this review, we update the physiology of somatostatin and its receptors (sst), the use of SRL in the treatment of acromegaly and the factors involved in the response to these drugs. The SRL act through interaction with the sst, which up to now have been characterized as five subtypes. The first-generation SRL, octreotide and lanreotide, are considered sst2 specific and have biochemical response rates varying from 20 to 70%. Tumor volume reduction can be found in 36-75% of patients. Several factors may determine the response to these drugs, such as sst, AIP, E-cadherin, ZAC1, filamin A and ß-arrestin expression in the somatotropinomas. In patients resistant to first-generation SRL, alternative medical treatment options include: SRL high dose regimens, SRL in combination with cabergoline or pegvisomant, or the use of pasireotide. Pasireotide is a next-generation SRL with a broader pattern of interaction with sst. In the light of the recent increase of treatment options in acromegaly and the deeper knowledge of the determinants of response to the current first-line therapy, a shift from a trial-and-error treatment to a personalized one could be possible.

Switching patients with acromegaly from octreotide to pasireotide improves biochemical control: crossover extension to a randomized, double-blind, Phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with acromegaly do not achieve biochemical control with first-generation somatostatin analogues. A large, multicenter, randomized, Phase III core study demonstrated that pasireotide LAR had significantly superior efficacy over octreotide LAR. This analysis explores the efficacy and safety of switching therapeutic arms in inadequately controlled patients during a 12-month crossover extension. METHODS: Patients with inadequate biochemical control (GH ≥2.5 µg/L and/or IGF-1 > ULN) at end of core study (month 12) were eligible to switch to pasireotide LAR 40 mg/28 days (n = 81) or octreotide LAR 20 mg/28 days (n = 38). One dose escalation to pasireotide LAR 60 mg/28 days or octreotide LAR 30 mg/28 days was permitted, but not mandatory, at month 17 or 20. RESULTS: Twelve months after crossover, 17.3 % of pasireotide LAR and 0 % of octreotide LAR patients achieved GH <2.5 µg/L and normal IGF-1 (main outcome measure); 27.2 and 5.3 % of pasireotide LAR and octreotide LAR patients achieved normal IGF-1, respectively; 44.4 and 23.7 % of pasireotide LAR and octreotide LAR patients achieved GH <2.5 µg/L, respectively. Mean (±SD) tumor volume further decreased from the end of the core study by 25 % (±25) and 18 % (±28); 54.3 % of pasireotide LAR and 42.3 % of octreotide LAR patients achieved significant (≥20 %) tumor volume reduction during the extension. The safety profile of pasireotide LAR was similar to that of octreotide LAR, with the exception of the frequency and degree of hyperglycemia-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Pasireotide LAR is a promising treatment option for patients with acromegaly inadequately controlled with the first-generation somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00600886 . Registered 14 January 2008.

Pasireotide for the treatment of acromegaly.

INTRODUCTION: Acromegaly is a chronic disease with high morbidity and enhanced mortality if left untreated. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy (somatostatin analogues (SA), dopamine agonists (DA) and growth hormone receptor antagonists) and radiotherapy. Despite these treatment options, "real-life" studies have shown that approximately 50% of patients are not controlled. In this scenario, a next-generation SA, pasireotide, has recently been approved for the treatment of acromegaly. AREAS COVERED: 1) pasireotide's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; 2) pasireotide's anti-secretory and anti-proliferative effects, from preclinical studies up to phase III clinical trials; and 3) the adverse effects of pasireotide, focusing on hyperglycemia; 4) biomarkers of response to SA treatment. EXPERT OPINION: surgery is the primary treatment for most patients with acromegaly; however, approximately half of them will need adjuvant therapy. At present, the decision of this adjuvant treatment is made on a "trial-and-error" fashion. Nevertheless, in recent years, efforts have been made to establish biomarkers for the response to drugs involved in the treatment of acromegaly, which will change the treatment of acromegaly towards a more personalized therapeutic decision-making process. In the near future, the establishment of pasireotide response biomarkers will allow us to identify good candidates for first-line medical monotherapy with pasireotide.

Pasireotide: a novel treatment for patients with acromegaly.

Morbidity and mortality rates in patients with active acromegaly are higher than the general population. Adequate biochemical control restores mortality to normal rates. Now, medical therapy has an increasingly important role in the treatment of patients with acromegaly. Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are considered the standard medical therapy, either after surgery or as a first-line therapy when surgery is deemed ineffective or is contraindicated. Overall, octreotide and lanreotide are first-generation SRLs and are effective in ~20%-70% of patients. Pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist, controls insulin-like growth factor 1 in 65%-90% of cases. Consequently, a subset of patients (nonresponders) requires other treatment options. Drug combination therapy offers the potential for more efficacious disease control. However, the development of new medical therapies remains essential. Here, emphasis is placed on new medical therapies to control acromegaly. There is a focus on pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) (Signifor LAR®), which was approved in 2014 by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency for the treatment of acromegaly. Pasireotide LAR is a long-acting somatostatin multireceptor ligand. In a Phase III clinical trial in patients with acromegaly (naïve to medical therapy or uncontrolled on a maximum dose of first-generation SRLs), 40 and 60 mg of intramuscular pasireotide LAR achieved better biochemical disease control than octreotide LAR, and tumor shrinkage was noted in both pasireotide groups. Pasireotide LAR tolerability was similar to other SRLs, except for a greater frequency and degree of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus. Baseline glucose may predict hyperglycemia occurrence after treatment, and careful monitoring of glycemic status and appropriate treatment is required. A precise definition of patients with acromegaly who will derive the greatest therapeutic benefit from pasireotide LAR remains to be established. Lastly, novel therapies and new potential delivery modalities (oral octreotide) are summarized.