Falls in people with mobility limitations: a cross-sectional analysis of a US registry of assistive device users.

Purpose of the Article: To (1) summarise the personal and clinical characteristics of persons with disabilities (PwDs) in the US who were evaluated for mobility assistive equipment (MAE) in the functional mobility assessment and uniform dataset (FMA/UDS) and (2) stratify subpopulations of PwD who reported falling versus those who do not report a fall.Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective, descriptive cohort analysis of adults with disabilities using the FMA/UDS. Data are collected during a user's initial evaluation for a new mobility device. The sample is intentionally general to be inclusive of all mobility device users. The primary variable of interest was a patient-reported fall within the 3 months leading up to their evaluation for a new mobility device. Subpopulation characteristics were stratified by this binary fall variable.Results and Conclusions: This study provides descriptions of PwDs being evaluated for a new mobility device. There were 11,084 PwDs with 31 different primary diagnoses. During their new mobility device evaluation, 52.2% of PwDs reported at least one fall in the last 3 months. For those who reported a fall, 46.6% of PwDs were using a walking aid or no device at all before the new mobility device evaluation. Additionally, persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida). These findings will influence future studies comparing different types of devices and their influence on falls and user satisfaction.

52.2% of persons with disabilities (PwDs) seeking a new wheelchair evaluation reported at least one fall in the last 3 months.Persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida).Earlier interventions for fall prevention including professional wheelchair evaluations may be warranted, but further research is necessary to explore long-term effectiveness.

Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus: an expert Delphi consensus to guide implementation in routine care.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may result in great impact on patients' quality of life, social relationships, and work productivity. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care could help capture disease burden to guide SLE management and optimize disease control. We aimed to explore the current situation, appropriateness, and feasibility of PROMs to monitor patients with SLE in routine care, from healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives. METHODS: A scientific committee developed a Delphi questionnaire, based on a focus group with patients and a literature review, including 22 statements concerning: 1) Use of PROMs in routine care (n = 2); 2) PROMs in SLE management (n = 13); 3) Multidisciplinary management of patients with SLE (n = 4), and 4) Aspects on patient empowerment (n = 3). Statements included in Sects. 2-4 were assessed from three perspectives: current use, appropriateness, and feasibility (with currently available resources). For each statement, panellists specified their level of agreement using a 7-point Likert scale. A consensus was reached when ≥ 70% of the panellists agreed (6,7) or disagreed (1,2) on each statement. RESULTS: Fifty-nine healthcare professionals and 16 patients with SLE participated in the Delphi-rounds. A consensus was reached on the value of PROMs to improve SLE management (83%) and the key role of healthcare professionals (77%) and the need for a digital tool connected to the electronic medical record (85%) to promote and facilitate PROMs collection. PROMs most frequently used in clinical practice are pain (56%), patient's global assessment (44%) and fatigue (39%), all on visual analogue scales. Panellists agreed on the need to implement multidisciplinary consultation (79%), unify complementary tests (88%), incorporate pharmacists into the healthcare team (70%), and develop home medication dispensing and informed telepharmacy programmes (72%) to improve quality of care in patients with SLE. According to panellists, patient associations (82%) and nurses (80%) are critical to educate and train patients on PROMs to enhance patient empowerment. CONCLUSIONS: Although pain, fatigue, and global assessment were identified as the most feasible, PROMs are not widely used in routine care in Spain. The present Delphi consensus can provide a road map for their implementation being key for SLE management.

Donor site morbidity after scapula free flap surgery of head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The scapula free flap is becoming increasingly more utilized in head and neck reconstruction due to its natural geometry and soft tissue versatility. This study reviews the incidence rate, risk factors, and treatments of complications of scapula donor site morbidity. METHODS: A review was performed for articles published between October 1990 and November 2022 in Medline (OVID), PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. After screening, 24 articles meeting the criteria were included. RESULTS: Overall, 660 head and neck surgeries with the scapula donor bone across 24 studies were included. Twenty studies of 612 scapula free flaps reported a pooled postoperative complication rate of 10.7%, with no major complications. Seven studies of 199 scapula reconstructions showed a mean Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score of 14.39/100. CONCLUSION: With its low rate of morbidity, the scapula flap presents itself as a good alternative for patients at risk for poor healing.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Japan: The REMIND Study.

INTRODUCTION: Symptom status and treatment changes among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using inhaler treatment in real-world clinical settings are not well understood, particularly according to class of treatment. We investigated the proportion of symptomatic patients among those with COPD using inhaler treatment, based on COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in clinical practice, and changes in inhaler treatments and symptoms at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study conducted at medical institutions with respiratory specialists in Japan. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CAT scores ≥ 10 or < 10 in each inhaler treatment group at registration. RESULTS: Of 414 patients in the full analysis set, 76 (18.4%), 261 (63.0%), and 77 (18.6%) were using long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), LAMA + long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) + LABA, respectively, at registration. The proportions of patients with CAT scores ≥ 10 or < 10 per inhaler treatment group at registration, respectively, were 32.9% and 67.1% in the LAMA group, 55.0% and 45.0% in the LAMA + LABA group, and 50.0% and 50.0% in the ICS + LABA group. Most patients (> 75%) in each inhaler treatment group showed no change in inhaler treatment at 1 year, regardless of their CAT score at registration. Approximately 70-80% of patients with CAT scores ≥ 10 at registration still had CAT scores ≥ 10 at 1 year; 10-30% of patients with CAT scores < 10 at registration had CAT scores ≥ 10 at 1 year. CONCLUSION: In real-world Japanese clinical practice, a considerable proportion of patients have persistent symptoms (CAT score ≥ 10) despite using mono or dual inhaler treatment; > 75% of symptomatic patients with COPD using inhaler treatment did not undergo treatment escalation at 1-year follow-up and remained symptomatic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05903989.

Sleep-loss related to itch in atopic dermatitis: assessing content validity and psychometric properties of a patient-reported sleep-loss rating scale.

BACKGROUND: Sleep loss is a key factor contributing to disease burden in people with atopic dermatitis (AD). Mitigating itch to improve sleep is an important outcome of AD treatment. This study explored the content validity and measurement properties of the Sleep-Loss Scale, a single-item rating scale for assessing itch interference with sleep in clinical trials of AD treatments. METHODS: Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 21 adults and adolescents (12-17 years of age) with moderate-to-severe AD to develop a conceptual model of patient experience in AD and explore the content validity of the scale. Data collected from adults with moderate-to-severe AD enrolled in a phase 2b study (NCT03443024) were used to assess Sleep-Loss Scale's psychometric performance, including reliability, construct validity, and ability to detect change. Meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were also determined using anchor-based methods. RESULTS: Qualitative findings from concept elicitation highlighted the importance of sleep-loss related to itch in AD. Debriefing analysis of the Sleep-Loss Scale indicated that the scale was relevant, appropriate, and interpreted as intended. Trial data supported good reliability, construct validity and ability to detect improvement. MWPC was defined as a 1-point improvement using trial data, a finding supported by qualitative data. CONCLUSIONS: The Sleep-Loss Scale provides a valid and reliable patient-reported measure of the impact of itch on sleep in patients with AD, and can detect change, indicating it is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the efficacy of AD treatments in moderate-to-severe patients.

Discrepancy between global- and disease-specific outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between patient-perceived changes in health and commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar decompression, or lumbar fusion at a single academic institution from 2017 to 2023. Correlation between the global rating of change (GRC) questionnaire, a 5-item Likert scale (much better, slightly better, about the same, slightly worse, and much worse), and PROMs (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale for back and leg pain, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary, and PROMIS physical function) was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 1871 patients (397 microdiscectomies, 965 decompressions, and 509 fusions) were included. A majority of patients in each group rated their lumbar condition as much better at each postoperative time point compared with preoperatively and reported improved health status at each postoperative time point compared with the previous follow-up visit. Statistically significant but weak to moderate correlations were found between GRC and change in PROM scores from the preoperative time point. Correlation between GRC and change in PROM scores from the prior visit showed some statistically significant correlations, but the strengths ranged from very weak to weak. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy, decompression, or fusion endorsed notable improvements in health status in the early postoperative period and continued to improve at late follow-up. However, commonly used PROMs demonstrated very weak to moderate correlations with patient-perceived changes in overall lumbar spine-related health status as determined by GRC. Therefore, currently used PROMs may not be as sensitive at detecting these changes or may not be adequately reflecting changes in health conditions that are meaningful to patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Changes in quality of life 1 year after intensive care: a multicenter prospective cohort of ICU survivors.

BACKGROUND: With survival rates of critical illness increasing, quality of life measures are becoming an important outcome of ICU treatment. Therefore, to study the impact of critical illness on quality of life, we explored quality of life before and 1 year after ICU admission in different subgroups of ICU survivors. METHODS: Data from an ongoing prospective multicenter cohort study, the MONITOR-IC, were used. Patients admitted to the ICU in one of eleven participating hospitals between July 2016 and June 2021 were included. Outcome was defined as change in quality of life, measured using the EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, and calculated by subtracting the EQ-5D-5L score 1 day before hospital admission from the EQ-5D-5L score 1 year post-ICU. Based on the minimal clinically important difference, a change in quality of life was defined as a change in EQ-5D-5L score of ≥ 0.08. Subgroups of patients were based on admission diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 3913 (50.6%) included patients completed both baseline and follow-up questionnaires. 1 year post-ICU, patients admitted after a cerebrovascular accident, intracerebral hemorrhage, or (neuro)trauma, on average experienced a significant decrease in quality of life. Conversely, 11 other subgroups of ICU survivors reported improvements in quality of life. The largest average increase in quality of life was seen in patients admitted due to respiratory disease (mean 0.17, SD 0.38), whereas the largest average decrease was observed in trauma patients (mean -0.13, SD 0.28). However, in each of the studied 22 subgroups there were survivors who reported a significant increase in QoL and survivors who reported a significant decrease in QoL. CONCLUSIONS:  This large prospective multicenter cohort study demonstrated the diversity in long-term quality of life between, and even within, subgroups of ICU survivors. These findings emphasize the need for personalized information and post-ICU care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The MONITOR-IC study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03246334 on August 2nd 2017.

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®) in breast cancer patients: The prospective observational multicenter VIP study.

Patients' self-reporting is increasingly considered essential to measure quality-of-life and treatment-related side-effects. However, if multiple patient-reported instruments are used, redundancy may represent an overload for patients. Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) are a tool allowing direct patients' reporting of side-effects. We tested psychometric properties of a selected list of PRO-CTCAE items, in a cohort of 303 breast cancer patients, using validated instruments for quality of life assessment as anchors. The analysis of convergent validity with HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and EORTC BR-23 sub-scales, and the analysis of responsiveness with the PGIC (Patients Global Impression of Change) score supported that a selected list of PRO-CTCAE symptoms might represent a standardized, agile tool for both research and practice settings to reduce patient burden without missing relevant information on patient perceptions. Among patients using digital devices, those with a higher education levels required shorter time to fulfil questionnaires. In conclusion, a selected list of PRO-CTCAE items can be considered as a standardized, agile tool for capturing crucial domains of side-effects and quality of life in patients with breast cancer. The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04416672).

Developing the EPI Symptom Questionnaire (EPI-SQ): a qualitative study to understand the symptom experience of patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI).

BACKGROUND: Symptom assessment is the key factor in determining disease status and optimal management of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). There is a need for a standardized patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire to assess symptoms in patients diagnosed with EPI. The purpose of this qualitative study was to increase understanding of the EPI symptom experience from the patients' perspective, and to develop and evaluate the content validity of the EPI Symptom Questionnaire (EPI-SQ) in US patients with EPI. METHODS: Concept elicitation interviews (Phase I) were conducted to understand the symptom experience in patients with a clinical diagnosis of EPI (i.e., fecal pancreatic elastase value of ≤ 200 mcg/g based on most recent value) due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatectomy. The EPI-SQ was developed based on the data extracted from Phase I interviews and feedback from clinical experts. Next, separate cognitive interviews (Phase II) were conducted to evaluate participants' understanding of the instructions, items, response scales, and recall periods of the instrument. RESULTS: During Phase I interviews (n = 21), 19 participants (90%) reported abdominal pain as the most frequent EPI symptom and lifestyle changes were the most frequently endorsed impacts (n = 18; 86%). Phase II results indicated that all participants (n = 7) felt the 12-item EPI-SQ was relevant to their symptom experience and that they understood the items, instructions, and response options as intended. CONCLUSION: The qualitative data from this study support the content validity of the EPI-SQ in measuring EPI symptom severity in US patient populations diagnosed with EPI.

Appraising mandibular prognathism in class III malocclusion following orthognathic surgery: Patient-reported and cephalometry-based outcomes.

Patients with class III malocclusion often exhibit mandibular prognathism and complain of "prognathic appearance". The overall positive effects of orthognathic surgery on facial appearance have been demonstrated using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), but studies investigating the correlation between subjective PROMs results and objective measurements of imaging studies are sparse in the literature. This study recruited consecutive patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery between January 2016 and January 2021. The PROMs survey was conducted focusing on subjective perception of mandibular appearance. Lateral cephalometric images were measured to examine the correlation with the PROMs results. A total of 96 patients were eligible for this study. Of these, 74 patients (77.1%) reported complete correction of prognathic appearance postoperatively, whereas 22 patients (22.9%) perceived residual prognathic appearance. In a comparison of postoperative measurements between completely and incompletely satisfied patients, there were significant differences in SNB, ANB, convexity, facial angle, Nv-B, Nv-Pog, SN'B', soft tissue facial angle, lip-chin-throat angle, N'v-B', and N'v-Pog'. The PROM results were significantly associated with the objective measurements of imaging studies. Investigating the correlation between PROMs and objective measurements enables integration of patients' perception of the outcomes into future therapeutic strategy and surgical planning, contributing to the enhancement of patient satisfaction.

Limited correlation between physical performance and patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose: The majority of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) patients wish to return to sport. Clinical evaluations after ACLr often do not include physical testing, making it difficult to determine the patient's readiness to return to sport. Thus, it would be helpful to identify easily assessable factors associated with physical function in ACLr patients that could inform planning of patients' return to sport. This study sought to evaluate the associations between physical test performance in ACLr patients and known ACL injury risk factors, knee laxity and patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Methods: The cohort included isolated primary ACLr patients operated between 2009 and 2014. Patients were invited to a 1-year visit to clarify their readiness to return to sport. A test battery was performed, including clinical evaluation, patient-reported outcomes and three physical tests, from which the Leg Symmetry Index (LSI) was calculated. Multivariate regression analyses were performed for each of the physical tests, including known risk factors, clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. Laxity <3 mm, pivot shift = 0, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sport >75, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) >75.9, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) >92.7 were applied as cut-off values for good versus poor status. Results: A total of 480 ACLr patients were included in the study. Laxity <3 mm had a negative impact on the single-hop LSI, whereas a pivot shift = 0 or IKDC >75.9 had a positive impact on the single-hop LSI. Age <20, a pivot shift grade of 0 and KOOSsport >75 were positively associated with the triple-hop LSI. Finally, age <20 and IKDC >75.9 were positively associated with the leg extension strength LSI. Conclusions: Age, sagittal laxity, pivot shift and patient-reported outcomes were associated with physical test performance 1 year after ACLr. However, the associations were not completely uniform and strong, so information on age, sagittal laxity, pivot shift and patient-reported outcomes cannot replace a return-to-sport functional test battery in determining when it is safe to return to sport after ACLr. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Confirmation of the Unidimensionality of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index Among Those With Various Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Background A semistructured patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) wherein patients rate the importance of structured items and the magnitude of the psychometric properties to be investigated (e.g., disability and satisfaction) facilitates patient engagement in their treatment and patient-centered clinical practice. The Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) is one such semistructured PROM that was originally developed to measure recovery from a whiplash injury. Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor structure among ambulatory community-dwelling people with traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. However, a confirmatory factor analysis has not been conducted among patients with various musculoskeletal disorders, and the internal structure of the SRI has not been established yet. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the internal structure of the SRI among patients with diverse musculoskeletal disorders. Methodology An anonymous survey was performed for patients who were referred for physical therapy for musculoskeletal disorders at a local orthopedic clinic. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. The goodness-of-fit criteria were as follows: chi-square/degree of freedom < 3, goodness-of-fit index > 0.90, adjusted goodness-of-fit index > 0.95, and root mean square error of approximation < 0.08. Results Data from 217 participants were analyzed. All goodness-of-fit criteria were satisfied. Conclusion This study confirmed the acceptable internal structure of the SRI among patients with diverse musculoskeletal disorders.

Survival and patient-reported outcomes of real-world high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer patients after reduction of adjuvant CAPOX duration from 6 to 3 months.

AIM: Adjuvant chemotherapy has been advised for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer since 2004. After the IDEA study showed no clinically relevant difference in outcome, reduction of adjuvant CAPOX duration from 6 to 3 months was rapidly adopted in the Dutch treatment guideline in 2017. This study investigates the real-world impact of the guideline change on overall survival (OS) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: Patients with high-risk stage II (pT4 +) and III (pN+) colon cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, based on surgical resection and adjuvant CAPOX before (2015-2016) versus after (2018-2019) the guideline change. Both groups were compared on OS, using multivariable Cox regression, and on PROs. RESULTS: Patients treated before (n = 2330) and after (n = 2108) the guideline change showed similar OS (HR 1.02; 95 %CI [0.89-1.16]), also in high-risk stage III (pT4/N2, HR 1.06 [0.89-1.26]). After the guideline change, 90 % of patients were treated for 3 months with no inferior OS to those still receiving 6 months (HR 0.89 [0.66-1.20]). PROs 2 years after CAPOX completion, available for a subset of patients, suggest a lower neuropathy (n = 366; 26.2 [21.3-31.1] to 16.5 [14.4-18.6]) and better quality of life (n = 396; 80.9 [78.6-83.2] to 83.9 [82.8-84.9]), but no significant difference in workability (n = 120; 31.5 [27.9-35.1]) to 35.3 [33.8-36.7]), with reduction from 6 to 3 months of CAPOX. CONCLUSION: This real-world study confirmed that shorter adjuvant CAPOX did not compromise OS and may improve PROs, complementing the IDEA study and supporting 3 months of adjuvant CAPOX in daily clinical practice.

Functional Improvement and Patient Satisfaction following Conversion of Fused Hip to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes, predictors of suboptimal functional improvement, and factors influencing patient satisfaction following conversion of a fused hip to total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic data was performed on 83 patients (83 hips) who underwent fused hip conversion to THA. Implant survival and predictors of poor functional outcome (Harris Hip Score [HHS] < 70) were analyzed. In addition, factors associated with patient dissatisfaction (visual analogue scale [VAS] < 25th percentile) were analyzed in 63 patients (63 hips) who completed a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaire. RESULTS: The median HHS improved from 55 (range, 18 to 77) to 78 (range, 36 to 100) at a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 4.8 years (P < 0.001). Implant survival was 97.4% at 10 years and 91.3% at 20 years, with any revision as the endpoint. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative reliance on mobility aids as an independent predictor of poor functional outcome (P = 0.021). There were 48 of 63 patients (76%) satisfied (satisfaction VAS ≥ 80) with the operated hip. Demographics and pre-/post-operative clinical data did not differ between satisfied and unsatisfied patients. Among the PROMs, the Forgotten Joint Score-12 emerged as an independent discriminator of patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion of a fused hip to THA provides functional improvement, favorable implant survival, and high patient satisfaction. However, patients dependent on mobility aids may experience suboptimal functional recovery, underscoring the need for careful preoperative counseling and patient selection.

Long-term follow-up after incisional hernia repair: Dynamics of recurrence and patient-reported outcome.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is common and recurrence rates remain high. Although the goal of treatment should be to improve quality of life, studies addressing this aspect are notably absent. We aimed to evaluate the long-term recurrence rate of open mesh repair of IH, investigate the burden of persisting discomfort, explore patient satisfaction, and identify risk factors for negative outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted on all open mesh repairs of IH performed between January 2002 and October 2013. Clinical data were gathered from medical records and operative reports, while patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained through telephone interviews. Risk factors for recurrence were assessed by survival analysis. PROMs were analyzed across patient subgroups by clinical and demographic variables. RESULTS: This study included 271 patients undergoing medical record review, with 136 patients completing the telephone interview. Recurrence rates at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years were 6%, 8%, 11%, and 12%, respectively. Risk factors for recurrence were obesity and an estimated mesh-defect overlap <7 cm. Bridged repair posed no increased risk. For PROMs, the median follow-up time was 13.6 years after which 78.7% of the patients reported no discomfort, and 89.0% were satisfied with their surgery. Patients <65 years and females experienced more long-term discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates were higher in obese patients and when the estimated mesh-defect overlap was <7 cm, but not in bridged repairs. Young patients and females are at increased risk for long-term discomfort. High satisfaction levels were reported.

Socioeconomic Differences in Patient Reported Outcome Measures 3 Months After Stroke: A Nationwide Swedish Register-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a well-known association between low socioeconomic status (SES), poor survival, and clinician-reported outcomes after stroke. We aimed to assess socioeconomic differences in Patient Reported Outcome Measures 3 months after stroke. METHODS: This nationwide cohort study included patients registered with acute stroke in the Swedish Stroke Register 2015-2017. Patient Reported Outcome Measures included activities of daily living (mobility, toileting, and dressing), and poststroke symptoms (low mood, fatigue, pain, and poor general health). Information on SES prestroke was retrieved from Statistics Sweden and defined by a composite measure based on education and income tertiles. Associations between SES and Patient Reported Outcome Measures were analyzed using logistic regression adjusting for confounders (sex and age) and additionally for potential mediators (stroke type, severity, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and living alone). Subgroup analyses were performed for stroke type, men and women, and younger and older patients. RESULTS: The study included 44 511 patients. Of these, 31.1% required assistance with mobility, 18% with toileting, and 22.2% with dressing 3 months after stroke. For poststroke symptoms, 12.3% reported low mood, 39.1% fatigue, and 22.7% pain often/constantly, while 21.4% rated their general health as poor/very poor. Adjusted for confounders, the odds of needing assistance with activities of daily living were highest for patients with low income and primary school education, for example, for mobility, odds ratio was 2.06 (95% CI, 1.89-2.24) compared with patients with high income and university education. For poststroke symptoms, odds of poor outcome were highest for patients with low income and university education (eg, odds ratio, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.49-2.15] for low mood). Adjustments for potential mediators attenuated but did not remove associations. The associations were similar in ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and more pronounced in men and patients <65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial SES-related differences in Patient Reported Outcome Measures poststroke. The more severe outcome associated with low SES is more pronounced in men and in patients of working age.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures used in Surgical Evaluation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to measure adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)-related quality of life in sleep surgery and analyze key psychometric properties in the original design and development of each PROM. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Disease-specific instruments assessing sleep-related quality of life that were used in sleep surgery studies and validated in patients with sleep disorders were included. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria were used to evaluate methodological quality. RESULTS: A total of 2494 abstracts were retrieved, and 216 underwent full-text review. Seven PROMs assessing sleep-related quality of life were identified. Only one (14%) PROM (SAQLI) was developed using both patient and physician input, and none were rated as "adequate" for content validity. Two PROMs utilized patients with sleep-disordered breathing during content development and none specifically queried patients considering surgery. Six (86%) PROMs demonstrated "very good" analysis of internal consistency per COSMIN criteria, and six (86%) included data on test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: Several PROMs are utilized in sleep-related quality-of-life assessments for patients treated with OSA surgery. The measurement properties of these PROMs are of variable quality, and notably, no PROMs meet adequate quality measurements for content validity. New and updated PROMs for OSA-related quality of life should consider input from sleep surgery patients and providers. Laryngoscope, 2024.

A cross-sectional survey assessing clinicians' perspectives towards redesigning the surveillance model for head and neck cancer: can we do better?

BACKGROUND: Service delivery of post-treatment surveillance in head and neck cancer (HNC) varies across institutions in Australia. To better understand current practices and develop protocols that maximize service capacity or incorporate emerging technologies, especially in under-resourced regional and remote communities, it is important to obtain the perspectives of clinicians that regularly manage patients with HNC. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study utilized an online survey distributed via email to specialists recruited from HNC-associated networks across Australia. The survey captured information on current practices and explored clinician perspectives towards re-designing the current surveillance model to incorporate telehealth or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics while open-ended survey comments were analyzed using a content analysis approach. RESULTS: Forty participants completed the survey (25 surgeons, 9 medical oncologists, 5 radiation oncologists and 1 oral medicine specialist). Most clinicians used either institution-specific guidelines (44%) or National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (39%), with the remaining 17% using surveillance intervals based on patient symptoms. Following treatment, 53% of participants imaged patients only when there was clinical suspicion of recurrence or new symptoms. Planned surveillance imaging was conducted at 6 or 12-monthly intervals based on the HNC subtype. Fifty-seven percent of clinicians were open to redesigning the surveillance model, specifically in low-risk patients who did not require nasoendoscopic examination. Seventy-one percent had concerns regarding the feasibility of telehealth appointments, citing disparities in digital health equity. Additionally, 61% felt PROMs are currently underutilized and were open to incorporating HNC-specific PROMS into surveillance. Open-ended responses indicated that within the current surveillance model, "fragmented service provision" and "administration issues" were significantly impacting on timing of care. CONCLUSION: Surveyed HNC clinicians feel that current post-treatment surveillance can be fragmented and potentially lead to delayed care. They are open to incorporating PROMS to assist in surveillance scheduling, especially in low-risk patients.

Three and twelve-month analysis of the PROM-Q study: comparison of patient-reported outcome measures using the BREAST-Q questionnaire in pre- vs. sub-pectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is being increasingly performed with implant placed above the pectoral muscle (pre-pectoral), instead of below the pectoral muscle (sub-pectoral). Currently, there is a lack of comparative data on clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- vs. sub-pectoral IBR. We investigated whether this difference in surgical approach influenced clinical or patient-perceived outcomes. METHODS: This prospective non-randomised longitudinal cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04842240) recruited patients undergoing immediate IBR at the Leeds Breast Unit (Sep 2019-Sep 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics and post-operative complications. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were collected using the BREAST-Q questionnaire at baseline, 2 weeks, 3- and 12-months post-surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients underwent IBR (46 patients pre-pectoral; 59% vs. 32 patients sub-pectoral; 41%). Similar complication rates were observed (15.2% pre-pectoral vs. 9.4% sub-pectoral; p = 0.44). Overall implant loss rate was 3.8% (6.5% pre-pectoral vs. 0% sub-pectoral; p = 0.13). Respective median Breast-Q scores for pre- and sub-pectoral IBR at 3 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 48; p = 0.01), psychosocial well-being (60 vs. 57; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 76; p = 0.53), and Animation Q scores (73 vs. 76; p = 0.45). Respective Breast-Q scores at 12 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 53; p = 0.3), psychosocial well-being (59 vs. 60; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 78; p = 0.18), and Animation Q scores (69 vs. 73; p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates equivalent clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- and sub-pectoral IBR. The study findings can be utilised to aid informed decision making regarding either surgical option.

Effect of Residual Pain After Posterior Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disorders on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Two-Year Follow-Up Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of residual pain after fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases on quality of life (QOL). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Residual symptoms after spinal surgery often restrict patients' activities of daily living and reduce their QOL. However, few studies have comprehensively addressed physical, psychological, and social factors. METHODS: The study population included a cohort of 208 patients (mean age: 67.9 years) who had undergone posterior interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease between 2012 and 2019. We asked the patients to complete the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) preoperatively, as well as at six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The presence of residual postoperative pain (RPP) was determined using the low back pain score of the JOABPEQ at six months postoperatively, and patients with an improvement of < 20 points compared to preoperative assessment were classified as RPP+ based on a previous study. RESULTS: In all patients, there was a notable postoperative improvement in all JOABPEQ and SF-36 domains compared to preoperative scores. The RPP+ group comprised 60 patients (69.6 years), while the RPP- group comprised 148 patients (67.2 years). In the RPP+ group, the lumbar function in the JOABPEQ and general health in the SF-36 showed limited postoperative enhancement. The pace of improvement in the role-emotional, role-physical, social functioning, vitality, and mental health scores was slower in the RPP+ group compared to the RPP- group. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we found that the presence of residual pain at six months postoperatively affected QOL improvement up to 24 months after surgery. Lingering postoperative pain substantially impacted functional incapacity, social engagement, and psychological well-being. Notably, the lumbar function in the JOABPEQ and general health in the SF-36 showed distinct progression patterns in the RPP+ group.