Biomechanical Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Finite Element Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of 6 pedicle screw internal fixation strategies for the treatment of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine using finite element (FE) analysis. METHODS: A finite element model of the T11-L3 thoracolumbar segment was established to simulate L1 vertebral burst fractures, and 6 models were conducted under multidirectional loading conditions: P2-D2, P1-D1, P2-D1,P1-D, P1-BF-D1, and P1-UF-D1. The range of motion (ROM) in the T12-L2 region and the von Mises stresses of pedicle screws and rods under the 6 internal fixation models were mainly analyzed. RESULTS: The maximum ROM and von Mises stress were obtained under flexion motion in all models. The P1-BF-D1 model had the least ROM and screw stress. However, when the injured vertebra was not nailed bilaterally, the P1-UF-D1 model had the smallest ROM; the maximum von Mises stress on the screw and rod was remarkably higher than that recorded in the other models. Moreover, the P2-D1 model had a ROM similar to that of the P1-D2 model, but with lower screw stress. The 2 models outperformed the P1-D1 model in all 6 conditions. The P2-D2 model had a similar ROM with the P2-D1 model; nevertheless, the maximum von Mises stress was not substantially reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The P1-BF-D1 model exhibited better stability and less von Mises stress on the pedicle screws and rods, thereby reducing the risk of screw loosening and fracture. The P2-D1 internal fixation approach is recommended when the fractured vertebrae are not nailed bilaterally.

Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical stability of OLIF, OLIF including posterior pedicle screw and rod (PSR), and OLIF including cortical screw and rod (CSR) instrumentation through finite element analysis. METHODS: A complete L2-L5 finite element model of the lumbar spine was constructed. Surgical models of OLIF, such as stand-alone, OLIF combined with PSR, and OLIF combined with CSR were created in the L3-L4 surgical segments. Range of motion (ROM), end plate stress, and internal fixation peak stress were compared between different models under the same loading conditions. RESULTS: Compared to the intact model, ROM was reduced in the OLIF model under all loading conditions. The surgical models in order of increasing ROM were PSR, CSR, and stand-alone; however, the difference in ROM between BPS and CSR was less than 0.4° and was not significant under any loading conditions. The stand-alone model had the highest stress on the superior L4 vertebral body endplate under all loading conditions, whereas the end plate stress was relatively low in the BPS and CSR models. The CSR model had the highest internal fixation stress, concentrated primarily at the end of the screw. CONCLUSIONS: OLIF alone significantly reduces ROM but does not provide sufficient stability. Addition of posterior PSR or CSR internal fixation instrumentation to OLIF surgery can significantly improve biomechanical stability of the segment undergoing surgery.

Finite Element Analysis of an Improved Correction System for Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Surgical treatment for spinal deformity aims to correct malformation, release the nerves, and reconstruct spinal stability. To explore and develop a new improved spinal correction system (ISCS) for clinical application, we studied the stability and biomechanical characteristics of the ISCS through finite element analysis and comparison of the ISCS with the pedicle screw and rod system (PSRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using L1-L3 CT image data of a normal adult male lumbar spine for establishment of L1-L3 finite element model, we established posterior internal fixation models for a comparative finite element analysis of PSRS and ISCS. An axial load of 500 N and a moment of 10 N•m were applied to L1 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Stress distribution characteristics, load sharing, strain bending stiffness and strain angle change of the models were measured. RESULTS: In flection and extension directions, the maximum stress of the L2 vertebral body and the L1/2 and L2/3 discs in PSRS was less than that of ISCS. In lateral bending and axial rotation directions, the maximum stress between PSRS and ISCS was similar. However, the stress shielding rate of L2, L1/2, and L2/3 intervertebral discs in ISCS was significantly lower than that of PSRS. We also found that both models had similar angular displacement and maximum displacement in lateral bending direction, but PSRS had a lower angular displacement and maximum displacement in flection and extension directions. Finally, we showed that PSRS had similar angular displacement and a lower maximum displacement compared with ISCS in axial rotation, whereas ISCS had lower bending stiffness than PSRS in different directions. CONCLUSION: ISCS can effectively fix spinal deformities compared to PSRS. ISCS provides a new option for orthopedic surgery treatment of scoliosis and, therefore, warrants further clinical studies in patients with other spinal deformities.

Comparison of Posterior Fixation Strategies for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Finite Element Study.

The management of thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures remained challenging. Due to the complex nature of the fractured vertebrae and the lack of clinical and biomechanical evidence, currently, there was still no guideline to select the optimal posterior fixation strategy for TL burst fracture. We utilized a T10-L3 TL finite element model to simulate L1 burst fracture and four surgical constructs with one- or two-level suprajacent and infrajacent instrumentation (U1L1, U1L2, U2L1, and U2L2). This study was aimed to compare the biomechanical properties and find an optimal fixation strategy for TL burst fracture in order to minimize motion in the fractured level without exerting significant burden in the construct. Our result showed that two-level infrajacent fixation (U1L2 and U2L2) resulted in greater global motion reduction ranging from 66.0 to 87.3% compared to 32.0 to 47.3% in one-level infrajacent fixation (U1L1 and U2L1). Flexion produced the largest pathological motion in the fractured level but the differences between the constructs were small, all within 0.26 deg. Comparisons in implant stress showed that U2L1 and U2L2 had an average 25.3 and 24.8% less von Mises stress in the pedicle screws compared to U1L1 and U1L2, respectively. The construct of U2L1 had better preservation of the physiological spinal motion while providing sufficient range of motion reduction at the fractured level. We suggested that U2L1 is a good alternative to the standard long-segment fixation with better preservation of physiological motion and without an increased risk of implant failure.

Effect of a titanium cage as a stand-alone device on biomechanical stability in the lumbosacral spine of canine cadavers.

Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis is a common disease in dogs characterised by intervertebral disc herniation, loss of disc height and stenosis. Decompressive dorsal laminectomy and partial discectomy can cause spinal instability and worsen foraminal stenosis. Pedicle screw and rod fixation (PSRF) with an intervertebral body cage allows for distraction and restoration of disc height and restores foraminal apertures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ex vivo biomechanical properties of a titanium intervertebral cage alone and in combination with PSRF in the lumbosacral spine of dogs. The range of motion, neutral zone, neutral zone stiffness and elastic zone stiffness of the lumbosacral joint (L7-S1) of nine canine cadavers were determined in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation for four conditions: (1) native (unmodified) spine; (2) dorsal laminectomy and discectomy; (3) stand-alone cage; and (4) cage in combination with PSRF. The intervertebral disc height decreased after dorsal laminectomy, but increased after insertion of the cage. Insertion of the stand-alone cage decreased the range of motion and neutral zone compared to the laminectomy-discectomy and increased neutral zone stiffness in all directions. The range of motion further decreased after PSRF. From a biomechanical point of view, the use of a stand-alone intervertebral cage is a potential alternative to dorsal fixation of the lumbosacral junction, since it increases spinal stability and restores disc height.

Influence on postoperative axial symptom by unilateral laminoplasty combined with different fixations / 医疗卫生装备

Objective To observe the influence of preoperatively physical curvature abnormality and different fixation systems on postoperative axial symptom (PAS) and union rate of hinge groove after unilateral expansive laminoplasty for the patient with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).Methods The study reviewed 106 CSM patients who underwent unilateral laminoplasty supplemented by lateral mass or pedicle screw/rod fixation with a minimum of 36 months of follow-up.According to being complicated with physical curvature abnormality or not,the incidence,initial onset,severity,duration of PAS and union rate of hinge groove at postoperative 6 months were respectively compared to analyze the influences of two internal methods on the features of PAS.Results For 50 cases without physical curvature abnormality,fusion rates of hinge groove in pedicle placement group was higher than that in lateral mass fixation group,the P value reached statistical difference (t=142.2,P=0.032).Duration of PAS in pedicle group was shorter than that in lateral mass group,the difference reached statistic significance (t=147.2,P=0.019).For 56 cases of with physical curvature abnormality,incidence of PAS in pedicle group presented was lower than that in lateral mass group,the difference achieved statistic significance (x2=3.89,P=-0.042).Conclusion Whether concomitant with physical curvature abnormality or not,pedicle fixation would be beneficial to promoting bony fusion of hinge groove,shortening duration of PAS and reducing incidence of PAS in contrast to lateral mass fixation to some extent after unilateral laminoplasty for treating CSM patients.

Biomechanics of transvertebral screw fixation in the thoracic spine: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE Transvertebral screws provide stability in thoracic spinal fixation surgeries, with their use mainly limited to patients who require a pedicle screw salvage technique. However, the biomechanical impact of transvertebral screws alone, when they are inserted across 2 vertebral bodies, has not been studied. In this study, the authors assessed the stability offered by a transvertebral screw construct for posterior instrumentation and compared its biomechanical performance to that of standard bilateral pedicle screw and rod (PSR) fixation. METHODS Fourteen fresh human cadaveric thoracic spine segments from T-6 to T-11 were divided into 2 groups with similar ages and bone quality. Group 1 received transvertebral screws across 2 levels without rods and subsequently with interconnecting bilateral rods at 3 levels (T8-10). Group 2 received bilateral PSR fixation and were sequentially tested with interconnecting rods at T7-8 and T9-10, at T8-9, and at T8-10. Flexibility tests were performed on intact and instrumented specimens in both groups. Presurgical and postsurgical O-arm 3D images were obtained to verify screw placement. RESULTS The mean range of motion (ROM) per motion segment with transvertebral screws spanning 2 levels compared with the intact condition was 66% of the mean intact ROM during flexion-extension (p = 0.013), 69% during lateral bending (p = 0.015), and 47% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). The mean ROM per motion segment with PSR spanning 2 levels compared with the intact condition was 38% of the mean intact ROM during flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 57% during lateral bending (p = 0.007), and 27% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). Adding bilateral rods to the 3 levels with transvertebral screws decreased the mean ROM per motion segment to 28% of intact ROM during flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 37% during lateral bending (p < 0.001), and 30% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). The mean ROM per motion segment for PSR spanning 3 levels was 21% of intact ROM during flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 33% during lateral bending (p < 0.001), and 22% during axial rotation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Biomechanically, fixation with a novel technique in the thoracic spine involving transvertebral screws showed restoration of stability to well within the stability provided by PSR fixation.

Management of unstable thoracolumbar spinal fractures by pedicle screws and rods fixation.

BACKGROUND: The thoracolumbar junction is the most common area of injury to the axial skeleton. Forces along the long stiff kyphotic thoracic spine switch abruptly into the mobile lordotic lumbar spine at the thoracolumbar junction. Goals of treatment are to obtain a painless, balanced, stable spine with optimum neurological function and maximum spine mobility. The present prospective study has evaluated the effectiveness of pedicle screw instrumentation in various fractures around the TL spine to overcome the complications encountered in the conservative line of management of these fractures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Thirty cases of fractures around the TL spine were operated with posterior pedicle screw fixation one or two level above and below the fracture. The cases were followed up for a mean of 9.5 months with radiological and neurological evaluation. RESULTS: The average age groups of the patients studied were 21 to 53 years majority were males, fall from height being the predominant mode of injury involving the T12 and L1 vertebral body. The unstable burst fractures the most common type of fracture, radiological parameters sagittal angle and index were recorded pre and post-operatively. The neurological grading was done using the ASIA score. Follow-up was done for a minimum of 5 months where sagittal angle reduction achieved was 10.75 at final follow-up from 23.5 pre-operative. The sagittal index achieved at final follow-up was 72% compared to the pre-operative mean of 53%. The neurological improvement was regarded to be fair enough for the type of injury sustained and fixation achieved. CONCLUSION: We found that the application of posterior instrumentation using pedicle screw and rod resulted in a reasonable correction of the deformity with a significant reduction in recumbency-associated complications; the limiting factor being the small study group and short follow-up period.